Designing org structure and COA

Hi
We are in the process of implementing oracle financial modules in India and we are a construction company,so we do all type of construction activity and hence it is project based.we will be implementing projects as well.
We are having operations through out the country but do not have any outside the country .
so while implementing what would be the best idea to have org structure.
should we go for multiple OU cosidering each project as OU or should we go with considering each project as cost centre ?
management would like to have MIS for each project and transaction of each project accounted separately does not want other project accountant to see transaction of other projects.
any idea would be of help.
thanks
Jogendra

Hi Jogendra,
Have you considered of having a Project Segment in your Chart of Acounts?
In that case using your Balancing segment and the Project Sement as a secondary Tracking segment you can track all MIS based upon the Project segment and the Balancing segment.
Whether or not to have multiple OUs also poses questions like how are the Projects Managed?
Are separate Companies floated to own and manage each of the Projects? If separate companies are floated, for India Localization tds needs to be deducted and the Threshold limits will work at Operating Unit level. As such, you must use multiorg and crete multiple OUs to keep the threshold limits of TDS and other taxes in place.
Security rules will need to be used in any case - as there will only be one GL (is you are using single set of Books).
So you can create a group company,
create one Legal entity and under this legal entity create as many OUs each having its own TAN no. Ths will allow the TDS slabs to be effective for each OU.
Hope by now the sturcture is materialising in your mind. Happy Implementation!!
Cheers!
Edited by: SatyaApps on Sep 9, 2008 8:51 PM

Similar Messages

Integrate HR org structure and CUA?

We are considering a new design for our authorization management on our production ECC 6.0 system.
There will be 2 productive ECC 6.0 systems; which system you use will depend on your global location. We currently utilize the HR org structure to assist us with provisioning and deprovisioning accounts on our durrent single ECC 6.0 instance, and we hang composite roles off of positions in the org structure, so that a fair amount of authorization management is automated.
If we were to put a CUA client over the two productive ECC 6.0 clients, how might that be integrated with the HR organizational model? Does CUA integrate well with an org structure? Any experiences with this would be helpful.

Hi Mary,
Firstly, are the org structures in the two ECC clients identical - in sync with each other?
If the org structures are different then it would limit the options that you would have:
- CUA client would simply be used for the provisioning of the user id
- The role to position allocation would still take place locally in each of the ECC clients
- You would have to maintain the 105 relationships locally in the ECC clients
- You would have to set the role maintenance option in SCUM to local maintenance
If the org structure is the same on both ECC clients, then it would provide you with some additional options:
Option 1 - use the approach described above to allow for local maintenance
Option 2 - ALE the org structure to the CUA client, then allocate the composite roles to the positions on the org structure and maintain the 105 relationship on the CUA client.
- the roles will then be distributed to the correct child system when the org recon is run
Option 3 - Use one of the ECC systems as the CUA client (Which we are busy implementing at the moment)
I'm using my ECC system as my central CUA for the production system, I know that many people would disagree with this due to upgrade requirements and all the rest. However in the Netweaver environment the ECC client is typically on the highest basis release, which caters for the CUA requirement and CUA is far more stable these days which reduces the risk. The other reason we have chosen this route is also the capacity of the ECC production system which is suitable.
Also the HRORG is maintained on the same system, therefore less ALE requirements to move the org structure between systems etc. In the landscape we currently have BI and Portal, future applications/modules include ESS, MSS, APO and SEM.
To achieve the solution I create all roles for all applications in the landscape, in the ECC client - for non-ECC roles the role definition is only role name and description (the correct authorisations are then maintained in the relevant child system). These are then distributed via RFC to the various child systems, it requires a couple of small changes but does work fine. All roles are then inlcuded into a composite role, regardless of which child system the role belongs to. The composite role is then allocated to the position in the HR org and once the HR recon is run, the role allocations are distributed to the correct child system. An example of a Line Manager Composite role would include:
- HR Line Manager (ECC Client)
- Cost Centre Manager (ECC Client)
- BW Line Manager Menu role (Portal)
- BW Line Manager Data role (BI client)
- Purchasing Approval (ECC Client)
I'm not sure if this has helped you, but in short the CUA integration with HRORG does work reasonably well and depending on the approach you choose it could affect the amount of maintenance that takes place. Just remember that the structural profile allocations would always take place locally on the ECC clients and only the role allocations can be managed from the CUA.
Regards
Sujeet

Integrate the Org structure and employees SAP HR system to CRM via ALE

Hi All,
We want to integrate the organization structure and employees from mySAP HR system to mySAP CRM system. We are also aware that the same can be achieved through ALE Interface between both these systems.
In addition to the HR Organization Structure from HR system, can we also bring over the Sales Organization Structure from R/3 using transaction CRMC_R3_ORG_GENERATE?
1) Can someone , please let us the possible challenges which might occur when we download HR Org structure from SAP HR to SAP CRM.?
2) What is the implication of maintaining an HR org structure and CRM Sales Org structure within the SAP CRM 52 system?
3) Any _precautions) should we take before doing the download via ALE??
Please get back, suitable points will be awarded.
Regards
Ritvij

Hi Ritvij,
Couple of things that spring to mind are:
1) When you do the initial data load (PFAL) try to ensure that no one is amending the Org structure as Objects can be locked and therefore not transferred. (on one of our test loads the top level was locked and therfore all subsequent levels were just transfered and we didn't have a top level)
2) Keep the 'forms of address' in CRM the same as the R/3 ones
3) Keep the same Employee and Org Unit IDs but prefix with (for exmaple) EM and OU in CRM. (Through the HR integration config in CRM). This may also (apparantley) aid you if set up something like an Employee interaction centre in the future.
I will update when other stuff springs to mind.
Cheers
Gaz

What sap fi org structure . and co org structure .

what sap fi org structure . and co org structure .

hi subhash....
FI structure is
Client->Controlling Area>Company Code-->Business area...
The Co organization structure is

Operating concern [/b>- Controlling area > Comapny code--> Cost center

Thanks & Regards
ranjit
null

HR Org Structures and MSS

Hello Everyone,
We've been testing various scenarios in our QA system regarding the 'relationships' between teams and supervisors with and without the chief's top hat in the org structure. Then, we were left with some questions.
How does MSS work? How can a senior manager in another organisational unit see the records of a manager from another unit?
Eg:- "X" is not a manager in his Org unit, is a supervisor of 8 employees who are all Manager's within their own org unit. Then, when we assigned the chief's top hat to "X" he can only see the employees without top hat's in the same org unit of "X".
So, do we need to amend to include supervisors of managers? i.e. not supervisors of employees just supervisors of managers!
How easy is it to do that? Without this senior managers will have less functionality than individual team managers.
Please let me know if you require any clarification.
Please help me in resolving this issue. I would appreciate your help.
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
PG.

Below is the way to test:
1. Create two Org Units - A and B
2. Create employees in Org Unit A and Manager in Org Unit B
3. Make the Manager chief of Org Unit B
4. Create reporting relationship between the employee and the Manager
5. Also create relationship between the employees and the Org Unit
6. Maintain User IDs of all the employees and the Manager in IT0105 in PA30
Above steps are at ECC end
Portal steps:
1. Assign MSS role to Manager's User ID
2. Assign ESS role to employees' User ID
Assignment of roles will be done Portal Consultant.
Then login to portal as Manager and check the team Calendar whether you are able to view the employees
Regards,
Suhasini

Org structure and import purchase procedure

hi,
Can anybody clarify the scenerio?
company is importing the raw materials from overseas at Kolkata,Mumbai and Chennai port .From the port the material will be distributed to different mfg plants across India. The procurement is happening only from Head Office which is in Mumbai.
How the organisational structure can be configured for this process?
Also can anyone explain the detail process of Import purchase?
Thanks in advance,
abimanyu

Hi
You have to define the org structure as ur req with multiple plants
Now u can do the imports and transfer the material from docks to the desired plant
while creating the po in ur HO u have to give delivery add of ur plant
IMPORT PROCESS
in ur pricing u have to create following
JCDB IN: Basic Custom Duty
JCV1 IN : CVD
JECV IN : Ed Cess on CVD
J1CV IN : H&SECess on CVD
JEDB IN : Ed Cess on BCD
JSDB IN : H&SECess on BCD
JADC Additional Duty of Custom
JCV1, JECV, J1CV and JADC will go to Excise MODVAT Accounts and JCDB, JEDB and JSDB will get loaded on inventory.
In M/06, for all above conditions, keep following controls;
Cond. class A (Discount or surcharge) Plus/minus A (Positive)
Calculat.type A (Percentage)
Cond.category B (Delivery costs)
Activate "Currency Conversion" and "Accrual"
now for setoff
maintain the following conditions in excise default settings.
JCV1, JECV, JADC
path: spro>logistic general >tax on goods movements>india >basic settings>determination of excise duty >maintain excise defaults >
along with ur tax procedure maintain these conditions in the specified fields
JCV1 in CVD condition field.
JECV in ECS conditon field.
JADC in ACD conditon field.
in case of secess on CVD, no need to maintain.
it is hardcodded in the standard
Vendor in GR 2 (Entry always possible)
Import scenario
1.Create material master of import goods.
2.Create vendor master record of import vendor and Customs clearing vendor.
3.Maintain CIN settings.
4.Maintain J1id.
5.Maintain Pricing procedure SAP standard JIMPOR..,maintain required conditions..JCDB,JCV1...
6.Assign the schema to respective import vendor in Purchasing view of VMR.
7.Create import PO ,check in conditions of JCDB, JCV1 the customs clearing vendor(Indian vendor) and percentage is assigned..This can be done by In condition tab select condtion then click on display,then enter.
Save the PO.
8.MIRO --Capture Bill Of Entry.(Commercial Invoice No.,).Customs clearing first .Here CVD will b converted to BED.
9.Capture Excisse invoice--j1iex.
10.MIGO.
Regards
ksk
12.Post Excise Invoice.
13.MIRO...Payment to vendor(import vendor)

Rule 168 to work with org structure and not relationships

Hi,
I would like to use rule 168 to work with the organizartional structure and not the relationships maintained in PO10 organizational unit.
this is because i want the agent to be the person with the red hat and not the a002 relationship maintained in organizational unit. i tried using rule 157 but it does the same thing and determines agent based on relationships maintained in org unit.
basically i dont want the agent to be any of the line mangers which may have been set up, i want it to be the red hat of the org structure
does anyone know how i can do this, or will i need to delete the relationships between staffing?
Thanks
Forhad

Here is a code example to read from the tables in base to the personnel number emulating the SWE_GET_MANAGER function, I hope this helps. Regards.
Z GET MANAGER *******************
***Gets the position for the creator of the requisition
clear V_OBJID.
select single objid into V_OBJID from HRP1001
 where otype = 'S' and
 plvar = '01' and
 rsign = 'A' and
 relat = '008' and
 begda <= sy-datum and
 endda >= sy-datum and
 infty = '1001' and
 sclas = 'US' and
 sobid = pt_cont-VALUE+2.
if sy-subrc = 0.
 valid if the user has personnel number don't proceed to look for the chief
 clear V_OBJID2.
 select single objid into V_OBJID2 from HRP1001
 where otype = 'S' and
 objid = V_OBJID and
 plvar = '01' and
 rsign = 'A' and
 relat = '008' and
 begda <= sy-datum and
 endda >= sy-datum and
 infty = '1001' and
 sclas = 'P'.
 if sy-subrc <> 0.
 if the user exist in the correspondant date gets the chief position
 clear V_POS_SOBID_CH.
 select single sobid into V_POS_SOBID_CH from HRP1001
 where otype = 'S' and
 objid = V_OBJID and
 plvar = '01' and
 rsign = 'A' and
 relat = '002' and
 begda <= sy-datum and
 endda >= sy-datum and
 infty = '1001' and
 sclas = 'S'.
 if sy-subrc = 0.
 if the relationship with a chief position exist gets the chief user id
 clear V_US_SOBID_CH.
 select single sobid into V_US_SOBID_CH from HRP1001
 where otype = 'S' and
 objid = V_POS_SOBID_CH and
 plvar = '01' and
 rsign = 'A' and
 relat = '008' and
 begda <= sy-datum and
 endda >= sy-datum and
 infty = '1001' and
 sclas = 'US'.
 IF sy-subrc = 0.
 clear pt_actor.
 refresh pt_actor.
 pt_actor-otype = 'US'.
 pt_actor-objid = V_US_SOBID_CH.
 append pt_actor.
 endif.
 endif.
 endif.
endif.
***************End of Z GET MANAGER.*****************************

Designing database structure and SSAS Tabular Model cubes

Hi.
I need to design a database and SSAS tabular models for my clients but I am confused which way I should implement it.
Data for all the clients is stored into a single database with unique ClientId for each client, such 15 tables I have under a single database which stores information about all the clients.
Task is to create a SharePoint Site collection for each client which will display Power View Dashboard by taking data from above database.
Till now I have created a SSAS Tabular Model for each client, XClientModel, YModelClient using BIDS and using SQL Queries to extract data for respective clients(select * from Table1 where ClientID="X") and using Power View external connection
to this model, have created Dashboard and other SharePoint information.
I am not sure if creating different Model is suitable or I should first separate data for each client into separate database and then create Model based on respective client's database.
Can Some one highlight pros and cons on using
SINGLE database with Multiple Tabular Model (One with Many) AND Separate Database with it's Model(One to One) ?
This is understandable but just putting it here........Imp Note: Data for X client shouldn't be visible to Y client on SharePoint.
Please let me know if further information is required.

Hi Sgms,
In your description, you said that all the clients information were stored in a single database, now you want to know which method is better, single database with Multiple Tabular Model or separate database with it's Model?
In your scenario, all the information were stored in a single database, why do you want to separate it or create multiple tabular model? If you create multiple model, then you need change the data source to create PowerView dashboard for each client. As
per my understanding, you just need create one tabular to load all the information. And then use this model to create PowerView dashboard. Using filter to display the information for each client.
Reference:
Lesson 1: Create a New Tabular Model Project
Filtering, Highlighting, and Slicers in Power View
Regards,
Charlie Liao
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.
Charlie Liao
TechNet Community Support

Difference between SU01 ROLE and attribute ROLE in org.structure

HI,
In SU01 transaction ROLE tab employee role is assigned to the user.
In org. strucute attribute ROLE also contains the employee role.
what is the difference between ther two ?
we should mention employee role for the user in SUO1 and attribute ROLE both places to create shopping cart ?
please guide...points are alloted.
Thanks
mani

Hi SRM guys,
Just i want to know what is the perpose of the attribute - ROLE in Org.structure
and what is use of the ROLE tab in SU01 for user.
Both places ( attributes and in SUO1-ROLE tab ) need to give the sap_bbp_stal_employee role ??? to shop the user...
please confirm ..

Plan version and org structure

Dear all,
As the company is planing to change/expand it's org structure, they created a new org structure. Someone said that, we can do future planing in by creating a dummy org structure and once it's approved, we can make it as original and will keep the old org structure for reference. And to activate the new org structure, we need to create a new plan version.
So my question is,
1. How to assign/link the new org structure to the new plan version? How can we make sure that the new changes (eg. any new joinee) will effect only in the new org structure and not in the old org structure?.
2. How to transfer the old org structure details to the new org structure?
Regards
ET

Hi Thomas,
You can copy your active org structure through Tcode (RE_RHCOPL00 - Copy) then in Table T77S0 make the Plogi - Plogi switch as 02 that is your alternate plan version. Then through PSO0 you can set this plan version.
Hope this helps.
Shrikant

What is the basic difference between MM and SRM org structure

Hi
All,
What is the difference between MM org structure and SRM org structure?
to my understanding SRM org structure deals with BP concepts where as MM don't, please correct me if I am wrong
please give your inputs
Regards,
Srinivas

Hello Srinivas,
what do you call MM organizational structure? Which ECC transaction do you launch to access it?
Regards.
Laurent.

Org Structure chosen within HR report

I hope I have this question in the right forum. Within a HR report built using the Logical database PNP, you can choose a Report Category that will will allow you to choose 1) Further Selections 2) Search Helps, 3) Sort Order 4) Org Structure. These are buttons at the top of the selection screen.
My question relates to choosing the Org Structure and if the user selects multiple Org Units when clicking on the Org Structure button. The PNP logical will take care of selecting the correct employees based on the Org Units selected.
Is there a way, when the program is executing to determine what the user chose from this Org Structure tree? It's not the PNPORGEH parameter on the selection screen.
Thanks
John

Nevermind. I wasn't looking hard enough.

Org Structure - "No attribute found for scenario BBP"

SRM 7.0 Extended Classic Scenario
Hi, On the check tab for the Central Person (SRM 7.0 shows CP instead of BP in org structure) I have the message "No attribute found for scenario BBP". This is SAP message number 5AT103
Transaction BBP_BP_OM_INTEGRATE is not showing or clearing the issue.
I have this issue with one user that I created manually, I dragged him around a lot. Other users I created manually within the same organizational unit are fine.
Also, we replicated part of the R3 4.7 HR Org Structure into SRM and I dragged it into my manually created SRM org structure. All users (error on CP tab, as I mentioned) replicated over, have this error.
I took a manually created user that was OK and dragged him into the replicated part of the org structure and he is still OK.
Please help.
Thanks,
Matt

Hi Matt,
We are facing similar issues. Please let me know how u resolved this issue ?
Rgds
Siva

Short Dump while copying Org structure from ERP to CRM

Hello Experts:
We are trying to copy the Org structure from ECC to CRM.
We have a standard transaction 'CRMC_R3_ORG_GENERATE' to copy the the org structure from ECC or the IMG path:
SPRO->CRM->Master Data->Organization Management->Data Transfer->Coppy ECC Sales Structure
We have a multiple assignment scenario where each sales groups are assigned to multiple sales offices and likewise,each sales office is assigned to multiple sales org unit in ECC.
This can be achieved by turning on the enhanced version.
In our current business,even though the sales offices and groups are created,but are not having relavance in the business,hence while running in the sandbox system, we ran the program to copy the structures in the standard mode(default) and we could copy it without issues and create the org units for every entity in CRM based on how the number ranges are defined.
What happens when enhanced version switch is turned on ::
While we turn the mode to enhanced version, The system automatically::
- enhances the Function tab page in the ppoma_crm transaction to include a grid table, in which you maintain multiple assignments of organizational units
- generates an extra dialog box to the Organization tab page in business transactions for you to select the relevant assignment path for the organizational unit
- adapts the consistency check in business transactions to take into account organizational units that have been multiple assigned
Risk factor :
Once you have switched to the enhanced backend integration version of the organizational model you cannot return to the standard backend integration version. The system will also automatically make changes to the organizational model version in CRM Mobile Sales.
Also this structure will happen across all the clients in the system,so unfortunately cannot try in a sandbox client also of the new environment.
We are building our development box,so while running the above step in standard mode,the program gives a short dump due to long execution time even though we have the same amount of data as in our prototype system.
Also, we increased the idle time value to a very high value.
When I approached SAP OSS,I was told that it is due to the multiple assignment scenario,hence we need to switch to enhanced version in CRM before we run the copy program ( CRMC_ORG_R3_GENERATE )
I am not quite sure if the mismatch of the scenarios between CRM and ECC could be causing this short dump as we could run it in standard mode in our prototype/sandbox environment without issues even with the same data volume as in the new development system .
I am looking for help from all the experts if they have come across similar issue and your recommendations/feedback if this can be corrected.
Appreciate your guidance/recommendation on this issue.
thanks!!

In CRM Best Practices Building block C05 is the step by step description how to replicate Org. structure and some of employee's master data.
Follow link - http://help.sap.com/bp_crmv12007/CRM_DE/BBLibrary/html/C05_EN_DE.htm

Org Structure Maintenance -- Real Experiences

HR Experts,
There are two alternatives to maintaining Org Structures in any Company, like
Creating and maintaining Org Structure
and Creating, Editing and Deleting / Delimiting the following
Org Units
Jobs
Positions
Work Centers
Relationships
Assignment Features, etc
FIrst alternative is that an individual or a group takes care of these at Cororate Level, for the entire Organization
Second alternative is to make Unit Level / Business Level individual / group responsible to maintain Org Structure for their Unit / Business.
I am not looking for suggestions as to which alternative is better, but I am looking for feedback on how it is being managed in your Organization / at your Client
Thanks in advance for your input
Points will be rewarded promptly.
Message was edited by:
learn saphr

Hi,
As per my experience our client wants every process to be done in corporate office only.
So we are doing configuration based on their requirement & for each processess which includeds workflows.
For Example if employees request for leave then it has to be processed by his chief who will send the mail to corporate office HR and from there his leave will be sanctioned. So the Cheif of every department will directly report to Corporate office.
Regards
Pavani
Remainder: Points to be given on answers

Designing org structure and COA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for