Determining wheather the o/p type is processed sucessfully

Hi all,
I am calling RSNAST00 through a program , using submit statement.
I want to handle the error in the calling program,.
How can I proceed for the same.
I am using
CALL FUNCTION 'JOB_open'
submit statement calling RSNAST00
CALL FUNCTION 'JOB_CLOSE'.
How can I trace in the calling program...
wheather the o/p type is processed sucessfully or not?
Regards
Rudra

Hi
Answer is pure assumption you can try following 3 options
(1) After submit try to incorporate the following statements
field-symbols: <STATUS> type any.
assign '(RSNAST00)NAST-VSTAT' TO <STATUS>.
if <STATUS> is assigned.
You can write your code, you will get the status value
endif.
(2) Implement Implicit Enhancement point in the program RSNAST00 in the last of FORM OBJEKT_ENTSPERREN, You can write a simple write statement Write : 'The Status is- ', NAST-VSTAT
It is better to add more conditions like if SY-BATCH = 'X' etc, since you are touching the standard SAP program.
(3) It is same of 2 option, but instead of write statement, you can pass to memory id and use it later
Regards
Madhan D

Similar Messages

How can one determine the nice level of running processes?

Renice is a wonderful and easy way to change CPU priority of processes. (If you are working in Final Cut Pro while rendering in After Effects in the background, you can set After Effects to only use leftover computing power that you are not needing in Final Cut Pro, thus not hanging up your work in Final Cut) Google renice to learn more). However.... how do you determine what the current nice levels of processes are?
Thank you, somebody!

Thank you! A total mystery language to me ("comm,nice"?) but works just dandy!

IDoc type could not be determined for the IDoc in F110

Dear All,
The below mentioned error is encountered by us in F110.We have check all the setiing and not able to find the solution for this error.
Now our heads has gone for a toss....can anyone kindly suggest what and where we have missed out.
The system is not creating the IDOC file.....
IDoc type could not be determined for the IDoc
Message no. B1090
Diagnosis
The IDoc passed to the ALE layer could not be processed. The specifications passed in the control record were not correct.
The basic IDoc type (field EDIDC-IDOCTP on the outbound side or EDI_DC-IDOCTYP on the inbound side)has not been specified for this IDoc.
The attempt to read the basic IDoc type from table EDIDO also failed. No table entry was found for IDoc type from field DOCTYP.
Procedure
Possible error sources:
- The calling program did not provide values for the fields specified above correctly. Make a note of the transaction in which this error occurred and consult your ALE administrator.
- The IDoc type is not known in your system and must be maintained.
Kindly do the needful.
Regards

If you want to create IDocs from the proposal run, outbound parameters (we20) with the 'Test' flag are required in addition.
see OSS note 504230 : Message EUPEXR forms the logical unit around the individual payment messages (PAYEXT IDocs). The E1IDRD1 segments contain the IDoc numbers of the payment messages in field DOCNUM. Segment E1IDRS1 contains check sums (total of all amounts, account numbers, bank numbers, number of payment messages). This information is provided for the EDI subsystem. Set up EUPEXR In Transaction WE20 for the partner profile for the house bank, create the outbound parameters for message type EUPEXR with IDoc type IDCREF01. If you want to create IDocs from the proposal run, outbound parameters with the 'Test' flag are required in addition.

Condition type not flown(not determined) into the sales order

Hello Experts,
There is one discount condition type which is having proper condition records, validity date.However, it is not getting determined properly and is not flown into the sales order. the user wants to know why this may happen.I tried to reason it may be the sales order date and the conditon record date may be different or the condition record is changed after the creation of the sales order.neither of the reasons seem to hold good. any ideas?
Regards,
Raj

Hello,
I have looked into the analysis and asked him to update the condition by clicking on that.also, I found that the condition record is having a proper valid date. now the user would update only after knowing the exact reason why it did not flow into the sales order,he knows he has to update the condition but would not do so till he knows the right reason why condition is not determined in the sales order. now this is the situation.
the probable reasons as per analysis of the conditon type are as follows(for your information). can it be one ofThere are different reasons for this:
1)The condition was deleted manually in the item condition screen.
2)The condition record was created later. Please note that order processing and pricing have buffer mechanisms. This means that a newly added condition record might only be found after order processing has been left completely and then started again. them?
Regards,
Raj.

IDoc type could not be determined for the IDoc

I am trying to Post the payment run through the transaction F110.
In the payment run log i get the following message:
"IDoc type could not be determined for the IDoc"
But in fact the IDoc is generated and it is displayed in We05.
I have configured the Message type PAYEXT-PEXR2002 and EUPEXR-IDCREF01 both for the partner.
Has anybody Idea about why this error is coming and how i can resolve this?
This is important because in Payment run log, they need to know the IDoc number generated for that run, else it may become difficult for user to identify which IDoc was created for a particular payment run.
Would appreciate if anyone can please help on the same.
Thanks & Regards,
Narayanan

Hi,
If you are paying the payment through F110, if the payment exceeds the limit what you are spefied in available amounts in FI12 screen. First Please check this screen.
still if you are having any problem
Check in the below path:
IMG- Financial Accounting (New) - Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable - Business Transactions - Release for Payment - 1. Create Workflow Variant for Release for Payment
2. Assign Release Approval Procedure for Release for Payment
3. Define Users with Authorization to Payment Release
Thanks
Chandra

VA00 condition type not getting determined for the returns order

Hi All,
I have a case where VA00 condition type not getting determined for the returns order that has been created with respect to the billing document.
When the pricing conditions are being copied from invoice it is getting copied but later it is getting deleted in the include LV61AA42.
Note:VA00 condition type is getting deleted from the internal table tkomv[].
If any one came across this scenario can you please help me.
Request your valuable inputs

Hi,
Please check the copy control setting in VTAA.
Maintain the pricing type as "D" at item category level for the respective document type .
Hope this will resolve your issue.
Regards,
Krishna O

[SOLVED] ERROR: Unable to determine the file system type of /dev/root:

:: Running Hook [udev]
:: Triggering uevents...done
Root device '804' doesn't exist.
Creating root device /dev/root with major 8 and minor 4.
error: /dev/root: No such device or address
ERROR: Unable to determine the file system type of /dev/root:
Either it contains no filesystem, an unknown filesystem,
or more than one valid file system signature was found.
Try adding
rootfstype=your_filesystem_type
to the kernelcommand line.
You are now being dropped into an emergency shell.
/bin/sh: can't access tty; job control turned off
[ramfs /]# [ 1.376738] Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3013.000 MHz.
[ 1.376775] Switching to clocksource tsc
That's what I get when I boot my Arch system. It worked fine for quite a while, but suddenly it ran into an error where the SCSI driver module was corrupt. I fixed it by reinstalling util-linux-ng and kernel26, however, I run into this issue now. http://www.pastie.org/2163181 < Link to /var/log/pacman.log for the month of July, just in case. Yes, I bought a new ATI/AMD Radeon HD 5450 this Saturday, but it seemed to work fine till this broke and it works fine on Ubuntu too, so I suppose we can rule it out.
Last edited by SgrA (2011-07-05 20:45:36)

Autodetection failed on your first image, in both your previous kernel installs:
[2011-07-04 16:14] find: `/sys/devices': No such file or directory
Which means that sysfs was not mounted. You should be able to boot from the fallback image, which does not use autodetect. Figure out why /sys isn't mounted, as well, and fix that.
This is also a somewhat crappy bug in mkinitcpio that lets you create an autodetect image that's useless. It'll be fixed in the next version of mkinitcpio that makes it to core.
Last edited by falconindy (2011-07-04 17:41:19)

What is the purpose of using return process sales doc type?

what is the purpose of using return process sales doc type?

hi,
There is the standard process
1)Order type( RE) VA01
2)Delivery( LR)Vl01n with reference to return order
i)if the movement is 651then system will not generate accounting document upon doing Post goods Receipt ,the stock will be in the return location
then you use movement type 453 to get the stock in UN restricted
ii)if the movement type 653 the system generates accounting document and stock posts in unrestricted use
3)With reference to Delivery raise Credit memo (RE) with transaction VF01
CHAN

What is the purpose of using credit process sales doc type?

what is the purpose of using credit process sales doc type?

hi,
A transaction that reduces Amounts Receivable from a customer is a credit memo.
Credit memo request is a sales document used in complaints processing to request a credit memo for a customer. If the price calculated for the customer is too high, for example, because the wrong scale prices were used or a discount was forgotten, you can create a credit memo request. The credit memo request is blocked for further processing so that it can be checked. If the request is approved, you can remove the block. The system uses the credit memo request to create a credit memo.
CHAN

What is the purpose of using debit process sales doc type?

what is the purpose of using debit process sales doc type?

hi,
A debit memo is a transaction that reduces Amounts Payable to a vendor because; you send damaged goods back to your vendor.
Debit memo request is a sales document used in complaints processing to request a debit memo for a customer. If the prices calculated for the customer were too low, for example, calculated with the wrong scaled prices, you can create a debit memo request. The debit memo request can be blocked so that it can be checked. When it has been approved, you can remove the block. It is like a standard order. The system uses the debit memo request to create a debit memo.
CHAN

What are the varoius type of process chain errors how we can solve them.

Hi,
I need to work with process chains maintainace , Can any body tell me what are the different type of process chain errors generelly we used to get ,how we can solve them . IF possible please provide me any document also so that i can solve my
abnormal problems for process chain errors.
Thanks in advance .

Hi,
1) Invalid characters while loading: When you are loading data then you may get some special characters like @#$%...e.t.c.then BW will throw an error like Invalid characters then you need to go through this RSKC transaction and enter all the Invalid chars and execute. It will store this data in RSALLOWEDCHAR table. Then reload the data. You won't get any error because now these are eligible chars done by RSKC.
2) IDOC Or TRFC Error: We can see the following error at u201CStatusu201D Screen:Sending packages from OLTP to BW lead to errorsDiagnosisNo IDocs could be sent to the SAP BW using RFC.System responseThere are IDocs in the source system ALE outbox that did not arrive in the ALE inbox of the SAP BW.Further analysis:Check the TRFC log.You can get to this log using the wizard or the menu path "Environment -> Transact. RFC -> In source system".Removing errors:If the TRFC is incorrect, check whether the source system is completely connected to the SAP BW. Check especially the authorizations of the background user in the source system.Action to be taken:If Source System connection is OK Reload the Data.
For more errors and solutions go thorugh the link below
http://indelasap.blogspot.com/2009/04/sap-bi-production-support-issues.html
Regards,
Marasa.

Failed to start worker process: Logon failure: the user has not been granted the requested logon type at this computer. (0x80070569

We just rebuilt our machine with server 2012, and it was working flawlessly and then randomly it started giving me this error if i would try to start up a machine. At first this was just an annoyance but now it is worrying me greatly. I have tried
everything from logging on as the domain admin account to the actual server administrator account. Nothing seems to start these machines up, and I need them to start.
'Computer1' failed to start worker process: Logon failure: the user has not been granted the requested logon type at this computer. (0x80070569).

Hi,
As this thread has been quiet for a while, we assume that the issue has been resolved. At this time, we will mark it as 'Answered' as the previous steps should be helpful for many similar scenarios.
If the issue still persists and you want to return to this question, please reply this post directly so we will be notified to follow it up. You can also choose to unmark the answer as you wish.
In addition, we'd love to hear your feedback about the solution. By sharing your experience you can help other community members facing similar problems.
Thanks!
Lawrence
TechNet Community Support

Upgraded to 5.0, then 5.0.1. In the process the various calendar "types" disappeared, but at least all entries showed in Ical, with entries made after the upgrade showing pinkish/red. Yesterday all formerly made entries, disappeared. any tips?

Upgraded to 5.0, then 5.0.1. In the process the various calendar "types" disappeared, but at least all entries showed in Ical, with entries made after the upgrade showing pinkish/red. Yesterday all formerly made entries, both old and in the future, disappeared, only recently made ones in pink/red are shown. any tips?
I did switch off and on, did a sync with itunes, etc, but no luck.

RIM doesn't push the upgrades -- your service provider does so, once they have certified and approved the operating system upgrade for their devices.
But, .973 does work on the 9520 in the manner you wish it would, I've used it myself on that model.
1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

How to handle the cost in third party process

Hi experts,
As the request, my client has some trading goods. the customer buy them from my client. but there is no stock in my client. for this transaction, my client send PO to the vendor and the vendor delivers the products to the customer directly. After my client recieve the shipping notification, they create the invoice to end customer. So i want to use the Third-Party Function.
But i have a confuse. How dose sap process the cost of trading goods(HAWA) in standard? you know, there is no stock for the trading goods, how to get the condition value of cost(VPRS)? Is there any special setting for the trading goods master data or some parameters in other place?
can anyone give some supports? Thank you very much.

Hi Dave,
You can capture vendor price in billing document as a cost.
Check the following settings.
1) select the determine cost field in third party item category.
2) Billing relevance F
3) check the VPRS condition type in pricing procedure. It will come after total amount.
VPRS statistical
Subtotal = B
Requirement = 4
Now create a sales order with third party material and maintain price E.g 500 USD
system will take VPRS value from material master in sales order level. E.g 300 USD. ( In billing level only system copies vendor price as a cost )
Do the following transactions after sales order.
Create a purchase order ME21N with reference to PR( take the PR number from Sales order)
In purchase order maintain price in item conditions tab E.g 320 USD.
Goods receipt MIGO
Vendor invoice MIRO
Now create a Billing document with reference to sales order number.
Here system takes VPRS cost 320 USD(PO price) instead of 300 USD which we maintained in Material master.
Regards,
Chandra

Batch determination based on WM storage type stock positions

Hello experts,
I am hoping the get some advise on the best method to achieve this:
We have batch determination turned on for select customers and the system is proposing stock that is mainly in our each or lose pick storage types (110), the issue with that is the fact that we do not pick in less then case qty for those customers so if the stock doesn't exist in our general storage the user must re-determinthe batch codes before delivery release.
This process is becoming very time consuming so I would like to improve it.
My first thought is to create a custom check in the batch search strategy that will only propose batch codes that exist in our general storage (search strategy based on WM stock positions)
Are there any other options to achieve a batch search strategy based in WM stock positions other then the one above and does that solution sound practical?

I'm not referring to the type of picking either (i'm not referring to picking strategies at all). I'm referring to storage type search criteria defined in OMLY.
"We need batch determination based on WM storage type stock positions" -> you are running BD at delivery level and therefore, there is nothing from a standard perspective that we can do to run BD based on WM storage type again. Since the BD has already occurred, we need to find other venues to direct the pick to the appropriate storage types.
This is what I'm understanding but I reckon there's something that I'm missing and so let's take the below example and then you can get back with corrections:
R001 plant
ZM01 storage location
Z01 WH
110, 120, 130, 140 storage types (110, 120, 130 are case/lose pick, and 140 is general)
Since you had mentioned earlier that the BD is running at plant level, I'd assume the storage location ZM01 is automatically determined (since the batch resides in ZM01). Since the batch is already determined, based on your 'storage search strategy' (110, 120, 130) the system tries to pick this batch in these storage types. Now, when there is no full case, you have to manually change the storage type to 140 to pick and this is where the problem is. So, I was recommending that since there is no standard way to automatically pick the full case from 140, use the enhancement.

Determining wheather the o/p type is processed sucessfully

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for