Difference between COPA-PCA

HI Guru's,
What are the major differences between COPA and PCA..
regards
JK

Hi,
this is a pure consulting issue and cannot be dealt within a few sentences.
PCA and COPA can be used simultaneously.
Please have a look on http:// help.sap.com --> ERP (english documentation) --> SAP ERP Central Component --> Financials --> Enterprise Controlling (EC) (for information regarding PCA) or follow the path Controlling (CO) --> Profitability Analysis (COPA) regarding information of COPA.
For a brief comparison between COPA and PCA follow the path:
Enterprise Controlling --> Profitcenter Accounting --> The Concept of Profit Center Accounting --> Role of Profit Center Accounting in the SAP System --> The Distinction Between Profit Center Accounting and Profitability Analysis (CO‑PA):
Profitability Analysis (CO‑PA), like Profit Center Accounting, is another form of profitability accounting. However, it is incorporated in operative cost accounting. That means that the profitability segments in CO‑PA are accounting assignment objects and are thus directly integrated in the flow of data in cost accounting.
In contrast to EC-PCA, where profits are found for areas of responsibility within the company, CO-PA lets you analyze the profitability of different segments of your operative business -- defined according to products, customers, orders, or any combinations or groups of these -- or organizational units, such as company codes or business areas. The aim of CO-PA is to provide the accounting department and decision-makers in sales, marketing, product management and corporate planning with information about the market.
You can define the master data and basic structures in CO‑PA flexibly to meet your company’s specific requirements. By choosing just the objects for evaluation (characteristics) and key figures you require, you can create a company‑specific multidimensional structure for analysis.
Unlike EC‑PCA, CO‑PA lets you use an account‑based or a costing‑based approach. In the costing‑based approach, you can define your own value fields for analysis. In account‑based CO‑PA, the values are represented in accounts.
EC‑PCA and CO‑PA should not be regarded as alternative components. On the contrary, they complement one another and jointly provide you with a flexible and comprehensive profitability accounting tool, allowing you both a market‑oriented viewpoint as well as a responsibility‑ and person‑oriented one.
Best regards,
Andreas

Similar Messages

  • Difference between COPA and COPA cube

    Hello,
    We have recently implemented COPA. There is a difference between COPA R3 and COPA BW. What can be the reason. Can it be internal orders if so how can we check and correct that.
    thanks

    Hi,
    Where can you find the difference ? In the data being pulled into BW ?
    First check for a sample data in R/3 RSA3 and see data for the same selections in BW PSA or any staging layers.
    Reconciliation Analysis in Financial Accounting
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/03/fb58a20d9611d3b65e0000e82d962e/content.htm
    ECC FI and BW Reconciliation
    R/3 - BW reconcilation
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/968dab90-0201-0010-c093-9d2a326969f1
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    JituK

  • Difference between COPA and BW

    Hi,
    I want to know what are the difference between COPA and BW. Some one already implemented COPA for our client and now the client is asking what are the advantages of implementing of BW and Why they are going for BW? Because already COPA was already implemented.
    Sateesh

    Hi,
    BW is a business warehouse of OLAP-type for SAP. BW has several standard 'cubes' for every component in SAP; GL, FM, etc. Amongst them there is also CO-PA. CO-PA by itself is sort of OLAP-cube, so putting it to BW could be only from technical reasons (perfomance, for example) or customer-specific definitions. In BW, like every modern OLAP tool, you can build your own cubes, merge several cubes, define additional key figures, build sophisticated reports, etc. Thus, it's more powerful tool in terms of BI analysis. Therefore, situation where you need BW only for CO-PA is possible and potentially justified.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Difference between COPA and Logistic Delta Mechanisam

    Dear All,
    May i knw the difference between the COPA and Logistic Delta Mechanisam h it works.
    In our Production system, when ever a logistic delta fails we take action and repeat it then it will featch the delta on the same day,
    where as in COPA delta, when it fails we take action and when we repeat it will fetch zero records and in the next day the delta will come.
    What is the difference in both
    What exactly is happeing in R/3 for these both delta mechanisam.
    Thanks in advance,
    K Janardhan Kumar

    Hi Guru,
    I will explain about  delta extraction with timestamp in general with an example:
    timestamp is generally in  yyyymmddhhmmss format
    let's assume delta runs daily at 09:00 morning.Last delta ran at 09.00 yestreday.And today when delta runs it picks the data ranges between
    09:01 (yesterday's) to  09:00(today).
    if one record is posted at 09:10 today,then it will not be picked by today's delta(coz' it is posted after 09:00)
    Hope now you are clear about timestamp.........
    In case of COPA ,we are using timestamp as a tool to identify delta
    now COPA delta mechanism has one more concept "saftey delta ":let's put a question to ourselves ,why we should use this;
    SAP answer is "The reason for the selection of the safety delta is that there are possible level differences of the clocks on different application servers. If the delta is selected on a level that is too low, it is possible that records
    are not taken into account when uploading into the BW."
    'Safety delta' usually will be set to 30 mins during the initialization /delta upload(default).
    This means that only records that are already half an hour old at the starting point of the upload are loaded into BW
    Ex:
    we have made following settings for copa
    timestamp=09:00
    safety delta=30 mins
    now when you run daily delta,it picks data ranges between (current timestamp-safety delta) i.e 08:30 instead of 09:00(yesterday's)
    to 09:00 today
    check this oss notes  502380 for better understanding on COPA delta mechanism
    Symptom
    There is some confusion about how the delta process works with CO-PA DataSources and the old logic (time stamp administration in the Profitability Analysis) or there are data inconsistencies between the BW and OLTP systems.
    As of PlugIn Release PI2004.1 (Release 4.0 and higher), a new logic (generic delta) is used during the delta process. Old DataSources can be converted to the new logic. New DataSources automatically use the new logic. With the new logic, the time stamp administration is located in the Service-API and no longer in the Profitability Analysis.
    This note refers only to DataSources with the old logic.
    Reason and Prerequisites
    Administration of the delta process for CO-PA DataSources partly occurs in the OLTP system. In particular, the time up to which the data was already extracted is stored in the DataSource control tables (old logic).
    Solution
    Since the control tables for the delta process for the extractor are managed in the OLTP, the following restrictions apply:
    1. There should only ever be one valid initialization package for a DataSource. Data inconsistencies may occur between BW and OLTP if, for example, you schedule an Init for various selections for the same DataSource and data is posted between the individual initializations to the Profitability Analysis. The reason for this is that each time the time stamp for the DataSource is initialized in the OLTP, the current value (minus the safety delta, see note 392876) is reset. Records from a previous selection are therefore no longer selected with the next delta upload if they were posted before the last initialization run with another selection.
    2. Initialization can always only be carried out from one system. Inconsistencies may occur if the same DataSource is used from several BW systems and if data is posted between the initialization runs. This is because the time stamp for the replication status is reset for every initialization or delta upload in the OLTP. Records may therefore be missing in the system that was first updated if updates were made in the result area before the Init or delta run. In the system that was the second one to be updated, the records that were loaded into the first system are missing for a delta upload.
    In the case of large datasets, you should therefore perform initialization either using several DataSources or with a combination of one or more full uploads and an init upload. Full uploads without errors are possible for closed periods/fiscal years because no additional changes are made to this data. Initialization should be performed, for example, from the current fiscal year. The full updates for the closed periods can also be split in time. If required, more characteristics, for example, the action type, can also be used for the selection. For information on the period selection, see note 425844
    Hope you are clear now!!!!!!!!!
    Cheers
    Swapna.G
    Message was edited by:
            swapna gollakota

  • Difference in Price per unit and Standard cost between COPA and PCA

    Hi
    I did a comparison between COPA and PCA for January. For few products,there is a difference in the Standard cost and PPU between the two reports(product wise). What might possibly be the reason for the difference. And how to analyze the root cause of this difference.
    Thanks
    Jaswanth

    Hi
    By PPU - Do you mean PUP i.e. Per Unit Price of Material Ledger??
    If yes, then you are not comparing apple to apple.. Std cost is bound to be diff than actual cost
    br, Ajay M

  • 1KEK and 1KEI Difference between FI and PCA KE5U

    Hello All,
    We have a difference between our FI and PCA and that is shown when we run the Transaction KE5U.
    we have a calendar year with 4 special periods as our fiscal year and 12 2010 was the last normal period
    The business made some postings in period 13 during their year end close.
    These postings in periof 13 2010 are not shown in PCA.
    I have tried the following
    Ran 1KEK and 1KEI for period 13 => System response: You cannot run these transactions for special periods
    Ran 1KEK and 1KEI for Period 12 => The difference still exist.
    I dont think we can open period 12 2010 again as the fiscal year 2010 is closed.
    Is there a different way to run these transactions and reconcile the balance?
    Please advice
    Subhani

    We figured it out.
    we had to perform the following steps in sequence to resolve the issue
    1KEK and 1KEH should be run periodically, every time we run the previous month we have to run it for all the proceesing months
    1. Ran 1KEH and 1KEK for Dec 2010 => this will transfer all the postings made in the special periods of 2010
    2. PCA balance carry forward 2KES
    3. 1KEH and 1KEK for Jan 2011 and Feb 2011 in sequence.
    Thanks

  • GR/IR account clearing using MR11 causing differences between FI and COPA

    Hi All,
    We have Costing based Profitability Analysis enabled. We are facing an issue in 3rd party drop ship orders and COPA. Cost of Goods Sold Drop Ship GL account is being charged when we use MR11 to clear GR/IR account. This is causing reconciliation issues between COPA and the General Ledger.
    Does anybody know how to update COPA when we carry out GR/IR clearing using MR11. Is there a workaround?
    Any clues will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks.
    Ram

    Hi ram
    I have a couple of questions
    1. Is the 100 USD of Sales order amount, the sale order value to be billed to the customer or the value of the goods to be delivered to the customer
    2. You said that Gr is done for 99, but MIRO is done for 100... Is this a case of price difference?
    3. you said upon customer billing, 100 is posted to COGS in COPA....How does the system gets this value, Is this the VPRS value or any thiing else?
    Also, when you reply back, I would need one more info from you... Follow the following steps
    1. Take the GRIR clearing document (material doc no), where in the 1 USD is posted to COGS
    2. Go to table ACCTIT and enter this doc no
    3. You will find the line items posted in this doc... Just check against this 1 USD line item, what is the transaction key i.e. GBB or PRD or what else?
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Difference between work bench request and transport of copies

    hi-- what is the difference between wrokbench request and transport of copies. when it comes to overwrite originals etc. thanks
    i am transporting from production to development and i need to make transport of copies of that workbench request, why i need to do this?

    Workbench request - created in the 'source system' where the object was first created. Each object has a 'source system' attribute (table TADIR).
    Copies - When transporting from a system other than the 'source system'.
    The basic idea is that the 'source system' is the place where an object shall be changed (using a workbench request), while copies can be moved from other systems as well. You can ofcourse override this check.

  • Difference Between Cost and Account Based COPA

    Hi
    What is the difference between Cost and Account based COPA from a BI perspective ( both functionally and technically)
    Thanks
    Rashmi.

    Hi Rashmi,
    Greetings.
    There is lot of reading material available on forums and help.sap.com
    For start you can try with this:
    Link:[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/7a/4c37ef4a0111d1894c0000e829fbbd/content.htm]
    Thanks
    Sachin

  • Difference between G/L Account Balance and PCA Balance

    Friends,
    After executing KE5T for the period 6 we are seeing a difference in the G/L a/c balance figures and the profit center figures for 2 balance sheet accounts. In one case the PCA balance figures are greater than the G/L a/c balance figures and vice versa in the 2nd case.
    What is the procedure to be followed in such cases? Is there any standard program that can identify the postings that are causing the differences?
    Please confirm at your earliest.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sameer S. Gupte

    Eli,
    Thanks for the reply.
    However, the note 126910 specifically mentions that it is not to be used for balance sheet account balances transferred to PCA using 1KEK.
    Can you please advise about reconciling differences between PCA and balance sheet accounts.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sameer S. Gupte

  • Difference between LO and COPA Extraction and Steps

    Hello All,
    Can you please share the COPA extraction steps and also advise why COPA is differnt from other extraction (e.g.LIS/LO etc.) mechanisms?
    And also advise what should be my aproach for any COPA extraction related reporting projects.
    Thanks,
    Mainak

    Hi Mainak,
    COPA Extraction -steps
    R/3 System
    1. KEB0
    2. Select Datasource 1_CO_PA_CCA
    3. Select Field Name for Partitioning (Eg, Ccode)
    4. Initialise
    5. Select characteristics & Value Fields & Key Figures
    6. Select Development Class/Local Object
    7. Workbench Request
    8. Edit your Data Source to Select/Hide Fields
    9. Extract Checker at RSA3 & Extract
    BW
    1. Replicate Data Source
    2. Assign Info Source
    3. Transfer all Data Source elements to Info Source
    4. Activate Info Source
    5. Create Cube on Infoprovider (Copy str from Infosource)
    6. Go to Dimensions and create dimensions, Define & Assign
    7. Check & Activate
    8. Create Update Rules
    9. Insert/Modify KF and write routines (const, formula, abap)
    10. Activate
    11. Create InfoPackage for Initialization
    12. Maintain Infopackage
    13. Under Update Tab Select Initialize delta on Infopackage
    14. Schedule/Monitor
    15. Create Another InfoPackage for Delta
    16. Check on DELTA OptionPls r
    17. Ready for Delta Load
    LIS, CO/PA, and FI/SL are Customer Generated Generic Extractors, and LO is BW Content Extractors.
    LIS is a cross application component LIS of SAP R/3 , which includes, Sales Information System, Purchasing Information System, Inventory Controlling....
    Similarly CO/PA and FI/SL are used for specific Application Component of SAP R/3.
    CO/PA collects all the OLTP data for calculating contribution margins (sales, cost of sales, overhead costs).
    FI/SL collects all the OLTP data for financial accounting, special ledger
    Difference: CO-PA / LIS / LO / FI-SL
    1)Method for Delta: Time Stamp / LIS InfoStructure / Change Log / PseudoDelta
    2) Application Specific: All are
    3) Extractors: Customer Generated (CG) / SAP BW Content / CG / CG
    4) Tables Used: Line item tables / 1 structure (s5nn). 2 tables (BWl1 and 2) and control change log (TMCBIW) / V3 update(asynchronous) and two tables: VBDATA and ARCFC (change log from SAP R-3 / Three types of tables - Line Item Tables- ZZP(plan) & ZZA(actual), - Total Table ZZT, - Objects Tables ZZO & ZZC
    Pls refer:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ee/cd143c5db89b00e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sapportals.km.docs/documents/a1-8-4/how%20to%20set%20up%20connection%20co-pa%20-%20extraction
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sapportals.km.docs/documents/a1-8-4/how%20to%20set%20up%20connection%20co-pa%20-%20retraction
    Differences between LIS,LO,CO/PA and FI-SL extractors
    *Pls   Assign points if  info is useful*
    Regards
    CSM Reddy

  • Differences between Costing based COPA and Account based COPA

    Hi,
    I wanted to know the main differences between Costing based COPA and Account based COPA?
    For which scenarios account based COPA used and for which scenarios costing based copa used.
    please guide me
    sateesh

    HI
    Costing-based Profitability Analysis is the form of profitability analysis that groups costs and revenues according to value fields and costing-based valuation approaches, both of which you can define yourself. It guarantees you access at all times to a complete, short-term profitability report.
    Account-based Profitability Analysis is a form of profitability analysis organized in accounts and using an account-based valuation approach. The distinguishing characteristic of this form is its use of cost and revenue elements. It provides you with a profitability report that is permanently reconciled with financial accounting
    Regards,
    Vijayanand Sankaran

  • What is CoPA , what is the difference between Cost based, Account based

    Hi
    what is Copa, what is the difference between cost based , Account based copa,  where we can use. 
    can you send me please related document.
    Thank you
    Anil

    Hello
    Profitability Analysis (CO-PA) enables you to evaluate market segments, which can be classified according to products, customers, orders or any combination of these, or strategic business units, such as sales organizations or business areas, with respect to your company's profit or contribution margin.
    The aim of the system is to provide your sales, marketing, product management and corporate planning departments with information to support internal accounting and decision‑making.
    Two forms of Profitability Analysis are supported: costing-based and account-based.
    ·        Costing-based Profitability Analysis is the form of profitability analysis that groups costs and revenues according to value fields and costing-based valuation approaches, both of which you can define yourself. It guarantees you access at all times to a complete, short-term profitability report.
    ·        Account-based Profitability Analysis is a form of profitability analysis organized in accounts and using an account-based valuation approach. The distinguishing characteristic of this form is its use of cost and revenue elements. It provides you with a profitability report that is permanently reconciled with financial accounting.
    You can also use both of these types of CO‑PA simultaneously.
    Check this link for more help
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/7a/4c48c64a0111d1894c0000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
    reg
    *assign points if useful

  • Difference between classic and ECC pca

    Hi All,
    Could someone please tell me what is the difference between Classic and ECC PCA?
    Regards
    Suresh

    Hi
                Enhancement of new general ledger flexibility, that is you can enter user-defined fields  and update the corresponding totals (Profit Center / Segment / Region). Many standard reports can evaluate the information from the user-defined fields.
    Due to the new document splitting function  (Online Split) you can create financial statements, if required, at the company code level as well as for entities, such as the Profit centers / Segment.
    Using the u201CDocument splittingu201D function (online document split), you can create balance sheets for company codes as well as for further entities such as the profit center . The balance is then set to 0 for each document for the profit center.
    There are no longer any time-consuming reconciliation tasks between FI and CO  for the end of period, since in real-time in Controlling, the system transfers cross entity processes into the new general ledger.
    Transactions 3KEH and 3KEI  from the classic Profit Center Accounting for maintaining proposal profit centers for balance sheet and P&L accounts are no longer used to set the profit center.
    Display of receivables and payable's per profit center real time ( if document splitting is active).
    Detailed information for the setting the Profit Center accounting in the New General Ledger:
    Define the update of the characteristics u201CProfit Centeru201D and u201CPartner Profit Centeru201D in the ledger by selecting the scenario u201CProfit center updateu201D.
    Define the field u201CProfit centeru201D as a splitting characteristic in the document splitting.
    Set the u201CZero balanceu201D indicator again for the added field u201CProfit centeru201D and you therefore have to create balance sheets on the profit center.
    Activate the required entry field check to ensure that the profit center is set in all postings.
    EC-PCA Profit Center Accounting u2013 Profit center accounting forms an interface between the operative controlling (CO) applications and the Enterprise Controlling (EC) module It reflects the actual and plan postings from operative controlling and settlements components with which it is in targeted in real-time. It then summarizes this data according to profit centers, which reflect the internal structure of areas of responsibility within the company code
    Regards
    Edited by: Dublin on Oct 26, 2009 12:17 PM

  • Difference/pctr-copa

    What is the difference between profit center accounting and Profitability analysis ?

    Hi Ameer,
    - Profit Center is particular division,branch/product line for which you want to find out the financial result.
    - COPA is more to do with specific business segments like, for a particular product line in a sales area how much is the profit?
    Profitability Analysis allows Management the ability to review information with respect to the company’s profit or contribution margin by business segment. Profitability Analysis can be obtained by the following methods:
    - Account-Based Analysis which uses an account-based valuation approach. In this analysis, cost and revenue element accounts are used. These accounts can be reconciled with FI (Financial Accounting).
    - Cost-Based Analysis uses a costing based valuation approach as defined by the User.
    Profit Center Accounting provides visibility of an organization’s profit and losses by profit center. The methods which can be utilized for EC-PCA (Profit Center Accounting) are period accounting or by  the cost-of-sales approach.
    Profit Centers can be set-up to identify product lines, divisions, geographical regions, offices, production sites or by functions. Profit Centers are used for Internal Control purposes enabling management  the ability to review areas of responsibility within their organization.
    profit center accounting is basicaly done for internal controlling purposes. It lets you determine the profit and loss using the cost of sale approach or period accounting approach. Here you can find the profit from an "area of reponsibility or pserson" point of view.this is accound based costing
    Whereas in Profitability analysis, market segments based on product , cutomer,order aor any comobination of these are studied to find wots the profit. PA provides information to the marketing,sales and planning department so that they can make decisions. PA has two forms account based and CO based.
    Assign points if useful
    Regards
    Genie

Maybe you are looking for