Difference Between  files in FCE -

I have the option to export in FCE to quicktime movie or export as quicktime format..... what is the difference and why?
I want to be able to play the finished project on a dvd for TV or mac/pc
is one better for quality?
Does one compress it too much?
thanks

Did you even take a look at the article I linked to?
From FCE, do this:
1. Export -> QuickTime Movie (uncheck self-contained)
2. Bring that QT movie into iDVD
3. Make your DVD and burn it
iDVD will encode the QT movie (reference movie) to DVD for you. Read more about the difference between reference movies and self-contained movies in the article by Larry Jordan. You don't have to worry about fitting the file on the DVD your self. As long as the video duration is under two hours (160 minutes), iDVD will take care of the compression.
In iDVD you can choose between Best Performance and Best Quality. I would go for Best Quality. In iDVD, choose the Project-menu -> Project Info. Make sure you select the right Video Mode (NTSC for the US, PAL for Europe), and choose between the two quality options.

Similar Messages

  • What are the differences between file vault and legacy file vault?

    what are the differences between file vault and legacy file vault?

    Legacy is an encrypted disk image of your Home folder, FileVault2 is whole disk encryption

  • Difference between file interface Idoc & Structure Interface Idoc?

    Hi,
    an any one tell me Difference between file interface Idoc & Structure Interface Idoc?
    Thanks In Advance.

    Hi
    [IDOC Structure|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/dc/6b824843d711d1893e0000e8323c4f/content.htm]
    [File Interface|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_di46c2/helpdata/EN/dc/6b7f6343d711d1893e0000e8323c4f/content.htm]
    Regards
    Pavan

  • Difference between File adapter and FTP adapter

    hi,
    I would like to know what is the difference between File adapter and FTP adapter
    thanks
    Yatan

    Both file and ftp adapters are non-concurrent jca adaps, however we go for file adapters mostly when you have files on your local environment and do not need to wait for someone to FTP the files on a timely basis. In case of FTP Adapter, we would need an FTP Server, a remote location with access where in files pitch in for polling.
    Also, File adapter is dependent on the local folder and OS, however FTP adapter is dependent on the local as well as the remote file system/OS/folder permissions/user access.

  • Difference between file structure; iTunes, XP and Vista

    I've noticed if I use iTunes to keep my music file organized that there's a difference between the way it organizes the file structure on XP vs Vista. In Vista it puts a Music folder in the iTunes Media folder whereas on XP it puts all the music directly into the iTunes Media folder.
    The reason this is a concern for me is that I'm using an online sync service to sync my music folders between my laptop and my desktop, but with different paths on two different OSes (XP and Vista) this is causing issues.
    Does anyone know if Apple is going to keep things consistent or if there's a reason for the differences? In the meantime I'll have to un-sync the folders and find a workaround.

    I've noticed if I use iTunes to keep my music file organized that there's a difference between the way it organizes the file structure on XP vs Vista. In Vista it puts a Music folder in the iTunes Media folder whereas on XP it puts all the music directly into the iTunes Media folder.
    The reason this is a concern for me is that I'm using an online sync service to sync my music folders between my laptop and my desktop, but with different paths on two different OSes (XP and Vista) this is causing issues.
    Does anyone know if Apple is going to keep things consistent or if there's a reason for the differences? In the meantime I'll have to un-sync the folders and find a workaround.

  • Difference between File Sharing, Dropbox, and Public Folder?

    I have this MBP out front & my Mac Mini in back. I'm comparatively new to networking, altho I've used File Sharing (FS) & Dropbox (Db). It seems now, there are a myriad of ways to sync my two computers. (ICloud is also used, just for Mail & iCal, since those are the only two I have that Apple allows on iCloud. I have the computers networked w/ an Airport Extreme. That all works flawlessly.)
    I'm aware of Apple's Drop Box, but it doesn't work since the two computers are over 30' apart.
    The three subject features all do the same thing, I believe, so along with this question, I'm asking which of the 3 is preferable. Dropbox confuses me because it refers to the Public Folder, when it seems only necessary to drag a file to the Db folder, rather than the Public Folder. Anyone know where the Public Folder fits into the Db scheme of things? Or even into the FS scheme of things? Or even into the total file sharing/snycing landscape? My hunch is to ignore the Public Folder.
    As to File Sharing, if I opt for this, then I don't need Db or the Public Folder. Right? The problem w/ FS is that both machines need to be up & running (and not in a Sleep mode). Also, FS is irrelevant when it comes to the Web. On top of all this, most apps come w/ the capability to upload files, photos, etc., for the Web. I'm in a situation where I need to keep track of what I'm sharing, whether it be through FS, Dropbox, or the Public Folder.
    I would really like to simplify my workflow by settling on just one means of syncing my two computers. I'm aware that Db is good for sharing files not only between my 2 Macs, but putting stuff on the Web.
    How do some of you share data between computers? What do you go with? All 3, 2, or just one? How do you keep things straight?

    I'm aware of Apple's Drop Box...
    You mean AirDrop.
    The three subject features all do the same thing, I believe...
    No, they're entirely different.
    File Sharing is a file service that works over a local network.
    Dropbox, which I've never used, is a cloud-based storage and file-synchronization service.
    The Public Folder is the subfolder of your home folder that's accessible to other users of the same computer, and also to other users on the network if File Sharing is active. (The term "Public Folder" may have another meaning in the context of Dropbox.)
    How do some of you share data between computers?
    There are many ways to do that, in addition to the ones you mentioned. It's not really clear what your requirements are.

  • Difference between files generated by converter

    hi to all
    can anybody plz tell me the diff between the .cap ,.ijc & .jca file generated by converter & use of those files while loading the SIM toolkit applet on the java card?
    thanks in advance
    Regards
    Divyesh.

    i but i think that will also not work .as Java Card
    2.1 development kit uses the same jar file as java
    card 2.1.2 kit.I think that the converter is different...you should try it.
    and one more thing Axalto views internally uses java
    card development kit 2.1.2 as a converter ,so how can
    i try with java card kit 2.1?Call the converter process directly using the command line with the jar. See the Java Card Development Kit documentation for details.
    -OR-
    Create a converter configuration for the Views tool by editing the Views converter configuration:
    VIEWS-Professional-1.8.X\config\converter\converter_globalconfig.xml
    - Add the Java Card 2.1 converter to the converter defintions at the top of the file
    - Add a custom <CardType> entry to your Views converter configuration file by copying an existing <CardType> entry. Change the CardType name value to something unique. Change the converter to match the converter definition you specified above. If you like, you can change the ATR to match your card.
    Now start Views, on the converter page, you will see that you can select the newly created card type, and based on the specified "Sun Java Card Converter" version will be selected.
    Now attempt to convert and load! Good luck - this is a possible solution. I hope it works...
    When the tools limit you, find an alternate path!

  • The difference between FCP and FCE...

    What does FCE not have that makes it "express"

    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1150384&tstart=0

  • Difference between system dsn and file dsn

    what is the difference between file dsn and system dsn

    System dsn will always be available in the system (it is saved in the system registry) and it's not depends on who created the dsn, but file dsn will depends on a file, so if somebody else use the system, the file dsn might not be available for this person.

  • What's the difference between masters, modified & original in iPhoto?

    Could someone please explain the difference between masters, modified and originals in the iPhoto Library? I am trying to make a backup online and want to cut out unnecessary transfer of data.
    I've recently installed an online backup service (with LiveDrive) and my MacBook Pro is slowly uploading over 50gb of data. This is frustratingly slow and I suspect unnecessary. I've instructed the program to not back up thumbnails and previews, but don't know whether to limit the backup to, say, masters. What are they?
    I've read quite a number of discussions from which I've learnt a lot - for example that iPhoto library is where the files are kept containg the data for photos, and that iPhoto is an ap that draws on those files. I can guess the difference between files containing original data and those with modified. But what are masters? And could I safely restrict the backup to masters?
    Please advise me!
    John

    Here's what I do:
    My Library lives on my iMac. It’s Backed up to  two external hard disks every day. These disks are permanently attached to the iMac. These back ups run automatically. One is done by Time Machine, one is a bootable back up done by SuperDuper
    It’s also backed up to a portable hard disk when ever new photos are added. This hard disk lives in my car. For security, this disk is password protected.
    I have a second off-site back up at a relative’s house across town. That’s updated every 3 or 4 months.
    My Photos are backed up online. There are many options: Flickr, Picasa, SmugMug etc. However, check the terms of your account carefully. While most sites have free uploading, you will often find that these uploads are limited in terms of the file size or the bandwidth you can use per month. For access that allows you to upload full size pics with no restrictions you may need to pay. Only some will upload and store Raws etc.
    The added advantage of using a site like SmugMug / Flickr is that the images are available to share and can be viewed from any computer. And for the ones you don't others to see, many of these sites also have password protection. It's for reasons like these I chose SmugMug, but YMMV
    Every couple of months I test the back ups to make sure they are working correctly. It’s very easy to mis-configure a back up application, and the only way to protect against that is to do a trial restore.
    So, if you look at my set up:
    I have daily protection against the Mac going down, I have a recent version in my car, and a 3 month version across town. That's all protection of my entire library - imges, database and so on.
    Then online, I have my photos, so that at least I have them if the Mac crashes, the house burns down, the car is stolen and my sister's house collapses...

  • Is there a difference between Creative Suite CS6 & Creative Cloud?

    Is there a difference between Creative Suite CS6 & Creative Cloud?

    Poorly executed? May be. No native and still learning.
    Not living in the country, where it´s easy to become a company owner.
    So, keep cool... There will be the day I learned. I try my best.
    The terrible syntax is mostly based on google translate..
    Narrow minded? Hm, may be.
    The difference between file access AFTER subscription only my problem?
    Hm, hm, hm?
    My business dependent on Adobes layers? Did I say/write that?
    Upps.
    And you think, I don´t have to care about these (my) layers? Hm.
    And on the other hand telling me about Quality (which is better than quantity)?
    May be I did something wrong till today.
    And I have to be glad, that there still are clients...
    Thank God.
    If someone has a legitimate question...
    And the answer has to come from professionals...
    Sorry, I just thought, the staff-answer didn´t describe the differences between CS and CC completely. Thought, there is missing a bit & want to help.
    But if you think it wasn´t necessary... And the difference between the both was perfectly and completely given, in a professional way, like you want,...
    Then Sorry, ... excuse.
    I don´t want to confuse with useless information...

  • What is the difference between Topic Keywords and Index File Keywords?

    What is the difference between Topic Keywords and Index File Keywords? Any advantages to using one over the other? Do they appear differently in the generated index?
    RH9.0.2.271
    I'm using Webhelp

    Hi there
    When you create a RoboHelp project you end up with many different ancillary files that are used to store different bits of information. Many of these files bear the name you assigned to the project at the time you created it. The index file has the project name and it ends with a .HHK file extension. (HHK meaning HTML Help Keywords)
    Generally, unless you change RoboHelp's settings, you add keywords to this file and associate topics to the keywords via the Index pod. At the time you compile a CHM or generate other types of output, the file is consulted and the index is built.
    As I said earlier, the default is to add keywords to the Index file until you configure RoboHelp to add the keywords to the topics themselves. Once you change this, any keyword added will become a META tag in the topic code. If your keyword is BOFFO, the META tag would look like this:
    <meta name="MS-HKWD" content="BOFFO" />
    When the help is compiled or generated, the Index (.HHK) file is consulted as normal, but any topics containing keywords added in this manner are also added to the Index you end up with. From the appearance perspective, the end user woudn't know the difference or be able to tell. Heck, if all you ever did was interact with the Index pod, you, as an author wouldn't know either. Well, other than the fact that the icons appear differently.
    Operationally, keywords added to the topics themselves may hold an advantage in that if you were to import these topics into other projects, the Index keywords would already be present.
    Hopefully this helps... Rick

  • What is the difference between: "Place..." or "Add files for Upload..."?

    Where can I get information about the detailed differences between the commands "Place..." and "Add Files for Upload..." of the Files menu?
    Understand that in both cases the files are linked and not embedded. But what further differences are there?
    I came across this issue because widget 039 (Animated Image Rollovers) from MuseThemes works only if you use the "Add Files for Upload..." option.
    Thanks,
    Daniel

    Hi Daniel,
    There are a few differences in both the options-
    Place is used to add content to page (rendered) while Add Files for Upload... is used to upload files to your site but not on page (not rendered).
    Placed images are published to /images folder on the server while images added using Add Files for Upload... option are published to the /assets folder on the server.
    Placed images have a chance of getting renamed (if resized/interpolated in Muse) upon publish while images added using Add Files for Upload... retain their names.
    Place can be used to add limited file formats like jpg/png/psd/swf/oam etc while you can upload almost any type of file using Add Files for Upload...
    You don't see Placed content in the Hyperlinks dropdown for linking while files added using Add Files for Upload... show up in the Hyperlinks dropdown so that you may link to them and allow download.
    Both serve different purposes and Add Files for Upload... is preferred by Widget Developers because it gives more control over uploaded content and assurance that file location and name will be as expected.
    Hope the above give you clarity on the basic difference.
    Cheers,
    Vikas

  • Difference between the way of login with ip address and SAProuter when checkin original file

    Hi, experts
    We found out:
    ① Login with ip address, check in a file with file name less than 22 Chinese character, OK.
    ② Login with ip address, check in a file with file name more than 22 Chinese character, error message 26253 appeares: Error while checking in and storing: &
    ③ Login with SAProuter, check in a file with file name more than 22 Chinese character, OK.
    What casues error in condition ②? The only difference between ② and ③ is the way of logining to SAP system.
    Best Regards
    Yemi

    Hi Yemi,
    based on your description I would kindly ask you to check the application log transaction SLG1 after getting the error message with your userID. Here normally further background information is listed that might help to get a hint what is going wrong.
    Best regards,
    Christoph

  • Difference between ASM Disk Group, ADVM Volume and ACFS File system

    Q1. What is the difference between an ASM Disk Group and an ADVM Volume ?
    To my mind, an ASM Disk Group is effectively a logical volume for Database files ( including FRA files ).
    11gR2 seems to have introduced the concepts of ADVM volumes and ACFS File Systems.
    An 11gR2 ASM Disk Group can contain :
    ASM Disks
    ADVM volumes
    ACFS file systems
    Q2. ADVM volumes appear to be dynamic volumes.
    However is this therefore not effectively layering a logical volume ( the ADVM volume ) beneath an ASM Disk Group ( conceptually a logical volume as well ) ?
    Worse still if you have left ASM Disk Group Redundancy to the hardware RAID / SAN level ( as Oracle recommend ), you could effectively have 3 layers of logical disk ? ( ASM on top of ADVM on top of RAID/SAN ) ?
    Q3. if it is 2 layers of logical disk ( i.e. ASM on top of ADVM ), what makes this better than 2 layers using a 3rd party volume manager ( eg ASM on top of 3rd party LVM ) - something Oracle encourages against ?
    Q4. ACFS File systems, seem to be clustered file systems for non database files including ORACLE_HOMEs, application exe's etc ( but NOT GRID_HOME, OS root, OCR's or Voting disks )
    Can you create / modify ACFS file systems using ASM.
    The oracle toplogy diagram for ASM in the 11gR2 ASM Admin guide, shows ACFS as part of ASM. I am not sure from this if ACFS is part of ASM or ASM sits on top of ACFS ?
    Q5. Connected to Q4. there seems to be a number of different ways, ACFS file systems can be created ? Which of the below are valid methods ?
    through ASM ?
    through native OS file system creation ?
    through OEM ?
    through acfsutil ?
    my head is exploding
    Any help and clarification greatly appreciated
    Jim

    Q1 - ADVM volume is a type of special file created in the ASM DG.  Once created, it creates a block device on the OS itself that can be used just like any other block device.  http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E16655_01/server.121/e17612/asmfilesystem.htm#OSTMG30000
    Q2 - the asm disk group is a disk group, not really a logical volume.  It combines attributes of both when used for database purposes, as the database and certain other applications know how to talk "ASM" protocol.  However, you won't find any general purpose applications that can do so.  In addition, some customers prefer to deal directly with file systems and volume devices, which ADVM is made to do.  In your way of thinking, you could have 3 layers of logical disk, but each of them provides different attributes and characteristics.  This is not a bad thing though, as each has a slightly different focus - os file system\device, database specific, and storage centric.
    Q3 - ADVM is specifically developed to extend the characteristics of ASM for use by general OS applications.  It understands the database performance characteristics and is tuned to work well in that situation.  Because it is developed in house, it takes advantage of the ASM design model.  Additionally, rather than having to contact multiple vendors for support, your support is limited to calling Oracle, a one-stop shop.
    Q4 - You can create and modify ACFS file systems using command line tools and ASMCA.  Creating and modifying logical volumes happens through SQL(ASM), asmcmd, and ASMCA.  EM can also be used for both items.  ACFS sits on top of ADVM, which is a file in an ASM disk group.  ACFS is aware of the characteristics of ASM\ADVM volumes, and tunes it's IO to make best use of those characteristics. 
    Q5 - several ways:
    1) Connect to ASM with SQL, use 'alter diskgroup add volume' as Mihael points out.  This creates an ADVM volume.  Then, format the volume using 'mkfs' (*nix) or acfsformat (windows).
    2) Use ASMCA - A gui to create a volume and format a file system.  Probably the easiest if your head is exploding.
    3) Use 'asmcmd' to create a volume, and 'mkfs' to format the ACFS file system.
    Here is information on ASMCA, with examples:
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E16655_01/server.121/e17612/asmca_acfs.htm#OSTMG94348
    Information on command line tools, with examples:
    Basic Steps to Manage Oracle ACFS Systems

Maybe you are looking for