Difference in F.07 & FBL1n
Dear Experts,
I have a problem in F.07.
There is some vendors have the balance in INR (company Code Currencty) and USD ( Transaction Currency). While running the F.07 its showing the balance xxxxxx. after run the F.07 we are corss checking the balance in FBL1n for that vendor but here its showing some other balance.
how F.07 will work and why the difference is showing FBL1n.
we are doing year end closing.
regards,
Gopi.P
There shouldn't be difference between F.07 & FBL1N.
Please run again F.07, this time actiavte detail log option in the main screen of the F.07
It'll show you the balance transfer process.
No harm to run this again.
Rgds
Murali. N
Similar Messages
-
Withholding Tax(TDS) on Advance(F-48) and On Final Payment-F-53
Hi Expert,
I am facing an issue related to TDS, on vendor advance. Its little different scenario, However rule is whichever is early.
Requirement is like this, generally they deduct TDS on down payment and in case of final Payment. No TDS at the time of invoice booking.
For example- Down payment made to Contractor Rs 200 @ 2%, Total invoice value was Rs 1000. TDS to be deducted on advance will be Rs 4. Invoice booked for Rs 1000.
Hence at the time of payment F-53, system should deduct TDS Rs 16 on Rs (1000-200) Rs 800. How can we achieve same while making payment F-53?
If I have to do same thing in case of invoice (FB60) then I can change TDS base value manually and put Rs 800 then system will calculate automatically.
From configuration point of view I have ticked on-
Change view “Withholding tax type definition-posting at time of paym. Under this ticked both option one by one even its not working.
No centre invoice
Central inv.prop
Regards,
K.PrasadDear Mukthar,
I tried but its not working.During Payment system is adjusting TDS automatically which we paid on Advance but during payment,TDS on final payment is not clearing and not assigned amount is not getting zero.
Step 1: Advance Amount Rs 1000@ 2%
Step 2:Invoice Booked of Rs 5000,no TDS during Invoice booking but payment withholding Tax code was ticked during Invoice booking,as you suggested.
Note:Total Invoice value is Rs 5000 out of which Rs 1000 made as an advance.Please see-step 1.
Step 3:F-54 advance clearing against above Invoice
Step 4: Payment of Rs.4000 subject to TDS
Here is problem,system is calculating TDS on Rs 4000@2% which is correct but not assigned amount is not getting zero.
How to clear this?
Once you click on INR net 4,900 blue line,then amount entered gets 5000.
Now click on WH tax tab,which is showing everything correct. but question is how to clear Rs 80 and not assigned field make Zero.Which is our requirement. If not assigned become zero then issue resolved.
Hope you understand my problem.
If i click on difference posting and simulate then -Not assigned tab gets Zero but it create one open item with Document types-KZ, which again is a issue to clear and you cannot clear.And if you simulate it then system is reversing TDS on advance and final total TDS is crediting this time.Till here no issue. Here is simulation entry-
This you are able to get only once you click on difference posting but in FBL1N with document type KZ Rs 80 would be appear and that you cannot clear anyway.
Vendor Master detail:
Hope you understand my problem,if you run this scenario then you would have more clarity however I covered all process.
Regards,
Prasad -
Recon Acct and Vendor Acct not tele.
Hi Experts
My report in FBL3N and FBL1N not same.
In FBL3N I only key in the;
G/L Code : 1234
Company Code : MY01
Open Item date : 30.06.2009
In FBL1N I key in the;
Recon account in dynamic selection : 1234
Company code; : MY01
Open item date same as FBL3N : 30.06.2009
If I extract the report for normal item then the report is same. If I check the noted item and special G/L transactions then the report is not same. I guess the FBL3N is not capturing the noted items and special G/L transactions.
Is the any table to get the report same as in FBL1N?
Thanks
Edited by: krishmenth on Nov 12, 2009 4:04 AMHi,
All the special GL Transactions are stored in Altenate Reconciliation Account.
Example:
If you posted down payment to vendor this transaction getting stored initially in alternate recon account. Once you transfer this from alt recon to normal recon account the recon account will get updated with this transaction.
Until there is a difference between Vendor Report(FBL1N) and GL Report(FBL3N).
Regards,
Krishna Kishore -
Withholding Tax (TDS) on provisions
Dear all,
Can you please let me know the procedure for reversing the TDS on provisions which is based on the provisions outstanding as on the year end.
We are able to achieve the dedution of TDS on provisions through the T-Code of J1INPR.
Afterwards, we normally book the vendors bill and deduct TDS on the same.
However as per the standard method we should run J1INUT to reverse the TDS payable which is credited at the time of booking the invoice.
But when we run the J1INUT in test run, system is giving the correct reference of the original entry of TDS on provision. But when we remove the tick of test run and then run J1INUT, system is giving the error of select the valid function.
Can you please guide how to handle such situation.
Regards
Dhirav ShahDear Mukthar,
I tried but its not working.During Payment system is adjusting TDS automatically which we paid on Advance but during payment,TDS on final payment is not clearing and not assigned amount is not getting zero.
Step 1: Advance Amount Rs 1000@ 2%
Step 2:Invoice Booked of Rs 5000,no TDS during Invoice booking but payment withholding Tax code was ticked during Invoice booking,as you suggested.
Note:Total Invoice value is Rs 5000 out of which Rs 1000 made as an advance.Please see-step 1.
Step 3:F-54 advance clearing against above Invoice
Step 4: Payment of Rs.4000 subject to TDS
Here is problem,system is calculating TDS on Rs 4000@2% which is correct but not assigned amount is not getting zero.
How to clear this?
Once you click on INR net 4,900 blue line,then amount entered gets 5000.
Now click on WH tax tab,which is showing everything correct. but question is how to clear Rs 80 and not assigned field make Zero.Which is our requirement. If not assigned become zero then issue resolved.
Hope you understand my problem.
If i click on difference posting and simulate then -Not assigned tab gets Zero but it create one open item with Document types-KZ, which again is a issue to clear and you cannot clear.And if you simulate it then system is reversing TDS on advance and final total TDS is crediting this time.Till here no issue. Here is simulation entry-
This you are able to get only once you click on difference posting but in FBL1N with document type KZ Rs 80 would be appear and that you cannot clear anyway.
Vendor Master detail:
Hope you understand my problem,if you run this scenario then you would have more clarity however I covered all process.
Regards,
Prasad -
Difference In Reports FBL1N & FK10N
Hi,
There is a typical thing happening with reports FBL1N & FK10N.
When I am displaying the Report FBL1N on a end of November it is showing 8 Open items out of which four items have been cleared in next month.
209,483.99
175,443.99
184,644.00-
153,898.24
315,989.99
175,443.99
175,443.99-
450,180.02-
219,992.19
When I display the report in FK10N at the end of Novemebr it is displaying only 4 open items only
209,483.99
175,443.99
184,644.00-
153,898.24
354,182.22
it is not showing the cleared items which were cleared next month.
So why is this difference between these reports to display the open items.
All the reports should show same open items list but this is not the case with these two reports.
Any ideas?Srinivasa
FK10N is for Vendor balances, not for "Open" Vendor items.
When you said, you ran FBL1n at end of November, I am assuming that your open item key date is end of November. So, there were 8 items which were open by November end and by December there were only 4.
Now, in FK10n..you have buckets by period. So, the November bucket will have the balance for all the 8 items (provided all these documents were posted in November) and your December bucket will have all the documents that were posted in December.
Also, please note that when you click in the Debit's column of FK10N report, only debit transactions will be displayed and so is the case for Credit's column. If you want the list of the all the transactions posted in a given period , you need to double click in the "Balance" column of the respective period.
Hope this helps. -
Difference between FBL1N and FB03
Hi Gurus,
Need some clarification on the System Behavior between the difference FBL1N and FB03.
I raised the invoice in USD and my local currency is INR and the same is configured in Additional currencies with the option 1.
For instance:
Expenses a/c DR: 1000
TDS deduction CR: 25.00
Vendor a/c CR:975.00
The system is rounding the amount UP as per the configuration. The problem is Vendor liability is showing as INR 975.00. But when i am clearing the invoice with the reflected liability in the vendor it is throwing the Error Message With Account determination not defined for transaction ZDI
But will it suffice if i clear the document in the USD currency. Please shed some light on this..
BR
Rohit raj.Hi,
Please check
1. Tax procedure TAXINN through transaction code and check account key ZDI and see whether G/L account is maintained against that key. OR
2. If not found in TAXINN procedure go to transaction code OBYC and check account key ZDI and see whether G/L account is maintained against that key.
3. In addition to it define G/L accounts for foreign exchange gain or loss in OB09.
Hope, this solves your issue else revert.
Regards,
Tejas -
Difference between FBL1N and S_ALR_87012082
Hello forum members,
I have the following problem: In the actual fiscal year I get different results when I execute the FBL1N and the S_ALR_87012082. When I compare the results of the FK10N for a single vendor with the S_ALR_87012082 I get the same results. When I compare the FK10N with the FBL1N I get different results, but only for the actual year. In the previous years everythings seems ok.
I also executed the report "TFC_COMPARE_VZ" and it says that there are no inconsistencies.
Is there sth. that I don`t understand?
Thank`s in advance.
Best regards.Hi Imer Sabani
Please check SAP OSS notes, seems like a program bugs.
Rahul Rana -
Difference balance between FK10N and FBL1N
Hi All,
In FK10N for a vendor for year 2012 there is a cumulative balance carried forward from previous year is 3711.80
When checked in FBL1N there is no items for 'Open items' and for 'all items' the balance is ZERO.
Will balance of FK10N has to match with FBL1N?
If it does not match, what is the reason?
Thanks,
VidyaOffcourse, it should tally.
FK10N displays only posted documents, but FBL1N can display parked documents also.
So while running FBL1N, select All Items and give END DATE only as 29.02.2012 and execute it.
Dont select spl gl tranxs, parked items, noted items, customer items,
Now run FK10N and execute for the same inputs and see.
You can also double click on ANY AMOUNT FIELD in FK10N, so system will drilldown to line item breakup for that amount. So for each amount field after doible clicking if you found the breakup for the same amount, then it is ok. -
Difference in amount figure between FBL1n and f-44
Hello All,
I am facing an issue wherein We have posted an Accounting Document of type SA against a vendor for 22582754.02 USD amount.
When we see this document using FBL1n t-code we see the invoiced amount of 22582754.02 USD in the Document.
But when we try to clear the document using F-44 the amount against the above mentioned document is showing as incorrect that is of 23,171,942.92 USD.
FBL1N:
Document number 1000 shows for 22,582,754.02
Docuemnt Number 1001 shows for 22,582,754.02
F-44:
Document number 1000 shows for 23,171,942.92 (different amount)**
Docuemnt Number 1001 shows for 22,582,754.02
I wnat to clear Document number 1000 and 1001 using F-44 tcode
Please suggest what could be the possible reason for this discrepancy in amountHi Nitin
Check for any partial payments already made for this document
the payment document would have 1000 in inv ref field
Also check this
go to t-code FB00 > Open items tab
uncheck "include invoice reference" if it is checked, then re-check your document in t-44
Regards
Sach!n -
Difference between cleared items,open items and all postings (FI).
Hi experts,
Can anybody tell me the difference between cleared items,open items and all postings for an account.
While running corresponding bapis and transaction FAGLL03 (for GL) or FBL1N (for accounts payable) i found that in some cases all postings is less than cleared items or open items for a time period. How could it happen.According to my knowledge all postings should contain cleared items and open items.
Please correct me..
Thanks and Regards
ArjunHi Arjun,
For every Billing Documnet created(VBRK/VBRP-VBELN) there will be an accounting document created in BSID/BSAD tables.
OPEN ITEMS means the Billed/Invoice Amounts that are pending from Customers, i.e which we have to receive from Customers.
CLOSED ITEMS means the AMOUNTS received from that customer.
OPEN ITEMS : fetch data from BSID table Only
CLOSED ITEMS : fetch data from BSAD only.
ALL POSTINGS : fetch data from both BSID and BSAD.
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Nitin. -
Hi Team,
When user compare the reports of vendor open item FBL1n and vendor aging report S_ALR_87012078, there is value difference in both of the reports .They try to compare the report on current date but system showing value difference more. What is the reason for this.it should be same in both reports right? please suggest on this..
Thank you
Regards
DharmaHello Dharma,
Check mentioned expalnation by SAP through note
1827228 - Difference between Drilldown report and Vendor Line Item Display - Transaction FBL1N -
Vendor and G/L line item are difference
Dear Gurus,
I have problem about FBL1N and FAGLL03 are difference
Example
period 3 : vendor A have Invoice # 1 with amount 100-
period 4 : Invoice # 1 was cleared with amount 100
When i run FBL1N as of period 4 the balance of Invoice # 1 is zero but the balance in FAGLL03 is 100-
The quesion is why clearing document does not disappear in FAGLL03
Thanks for the answerDear rohit aggrawal ,
I have already checked all posting. it is cerrect.
posting date for Invoice document is 31.08.2007
posting date and clearing date for clearing document is 31.08.2007
so when i execute FAGLL03 with open item as of 31.08.2007 the balance should be zero.
but it is show invoice document only, clearing document does not disapplear.
additional information, i check the clearing document does not have in table FAGLFLEXA
Edited by: runma ne on Jul 15, 2008 6:42 AM -
Exchange rate difference to be hit to desired GL account
Dear Experts,
While doing material IV the exchange rate is different and bill of entry figure for Exchange rate is different...so the difference is hitting say for ex.GL account A..(Foreign exc var-exp)...But the user wants it to be hit in GL account B..(RM Consumption).when we enter FBL1n i.e Vendor line item display..it is showing GL account A
In this case please guide me from where it needs to be changed...
Regards
NaineshHello,
See T.Code OMRW
SPRO-MM-LIV-Incoming invoices-Configure how exchange rate diff are treated.
Regards -
Open item amt different between the FBL1N screen and the payment screen
Hi,
I have a vendor open item in foreign currency and the amt shown in the FBL1N screen and the payment screen F-53 is different for this open item. The difference is because the open item is shown as per the latest exchange rate in the payment screen. The open item is revaluated according to the latest exchange rate and shown in the payment screen.
Actually the open item should not be revaluated in the payment screen. Instead of that it should show the original invoice amount as per the invoice posting without revaluation. Is my understanding correct or the system will revaluate the open item as per the latest exchange rate and display it in the payment screen?Hi Raja,
I think that the items will be revaluated while clearing.If you donot want the system to consider the same while clearing open items in local currency,in Company code global parameters select checkbox No ex.rate difference when clearing in local crcy.
Thnaks
Aravind -
Vendor Balance Diff. FBL1N & FK10N
Hi Expert,
We have an issue regarding Vendor Balance Display account Showing Debit Balance Rs.7500/-
while FBL1N Vendor Line item showing Credit Balance Rs. 85600- .
why difference for same Report for Vendor. its urgent kindly help me.
Kind Regards
Pranav Kr. Gupta
SAP FICO Consultant.Hi,
there is no different between FK10N and FBL1N for balances
example :
1. first FBL1N - give vendor and select all items - give date 01.04.2013 to 31.03.2014
and select - Normal items & Spl Gl indicator then execute -
2. FK10N - same vendor code , company code & year 2013 - execute - go to Special GL tab and select Total row and Press F2
then system will show all line items , pls check all line item should be same in both reports
Thanking you
Regards
Mahesh
Maybe you are looking for
-
The niFPui.mxx plug-in caused an exception in the CmxAggregateItemUI::InvokeCommand function in the NIMax process. When saving *.iak file in MAX4.6 Hi There, The subject header just about says it all. This is the first action I took with MAX - it is
-
How to add icon in front of Send To menu in context menu?
Is it possible to add icon to the Send To entry in the windows explorer context menu?
-
After effects color corrected clip not showing correctly in Premiere
Hello all, I have recently made a short film with a few effects in Premiere and After effects CS4. I have used the Dynamic Link to accomplish this. I have added color correction with Color Finesse in After effects. The problem is I some of the col
-
Custom controller context value attribute
Hello, I have a custom controller with one value attribute. In the wdDoInit() method of the custom controller I can not access this attribute using: wdContext.currentContextElement().setAttrib() Why? The same works without any problems using the comp
-
WCF rest services STS and JavaScript
Hello I want to have rest services that are claims enabled, the token should be issued by the STS after the user log in to the web app. This token shall be saved and used by JavaScript calls to the rest services. Is this possible? if so kindly provid