Difference in GL balance and asset report

Hi Experts
The scenario is difference in the asset report and GL report for the year 2009. The year is not yet closed in asset accounting.I have run the ABST2 and it shows difference in the GL for AUC .The asset balance report S_alr_87011964 & s_alr_87012026 report shows a difference and also verified with the asset table. The opening balances in FS10N for 2010 is C/F correctly from 2009.The GL balance is more than the asset balance due to incorrect updation in 2009.I have referred the note 104567 and 69225.There are more than thousand line items in the transaction of this asset of either t type 100,105 or 130 .The history report does not show values for this asset also since this is AUC there is no chance of depreciation not being posted.
Since the GL balance is more than balance in the asset report I cannot pass any adjustment entry using ABF1. How can I identify which particular acquisition is not updated in the asset table and how can I fix to ensure that the asset and GL tally with each other.Kindly advice.
Thanks
Sunil

Please check the link [Reconciliation ABST2 & GL|Re: ABST2- FI-AA reconciliation posting;
It might help you.
Regards,
Sridevi

Similar Messages

What is difference between interactive list and interactive reports?

what is difference between interactive list and interactive reports?

hi check this..
interactive report/list means any input(double click or single click or user command ) on the screen will results a new screen with the corresponding fields....this is upto 20 levels only check this..
report .
start-of-selection.
write:/ 'this is the source list'.
at line-selection .
if sy-lsind = 1 .
write:/ ' this is the 1st list'.
elseif.
if sy-lsind = 2 .
write:/ ' this is the 2 list'.
if sy-lsind = 3 .
write:/ ' this is the 3 list'.
if sy-lsind = 4 .
write:/ ' this is the 4 list'.
if sy-lsind = 5 .
write:/ ' this is the 5 list'.
if sy-lsind = 6 .
write:/ ' this is the 6 list'.
if sy-lsind = 7 .
write:/ ' this is the 7 list'.
if sy-lsind = 8.
write:/ ' this is the 8 list'.
if sy-lsind = 9 .
write:/ ' this is the 9 list'.
if sy-lsind = 10 .
write:/ ' this is the 10 list'.
endif.
regards,
venkat

Difference in closind balance and opening balance of GL account

Hi,
There is a difference in Closing balance and opening balance of GL account, which is an realisation account, is there any way to find out the reason of the difference.
Previous year balance was transfered to this year by T f.16.
Please support.

HI Vikas,
If it is not too late..check the SAP note # 176067.
Atleast, it might help some one else working on a similar issue.
Hope this helps.
-Pradeep

Difference in Trial balance and Subledger of asset

Hi ,
After running the depreciation for the period 3 user come to know that there is difference in Accumulated deprecation (FS10n) and Asset balance in S_ALR_87011990 .The difference is 0.1 . How to find these difference ? Which asset is affecting wrong value ? how to resolve this issue. Please urgent.
These accumulated depreciation effected on the F.01.
Suggestions will be appreciate .
Thank you
Dharma

Hi
Thanks for your reply.
But the difference how can I adjust ?what is the entry?
Example :
F.01-Accumulated depreciation value =999
S_ALR_87011990-Asset total value=1000
Variance =1
Means accumulated depreciation less than asset value .
These variance where I have to adjust ? what is the t.code
for that ? What is entry (debit/Credit to be).After adding these value to
accumulated depreciation it should be show equal in F.01 and S_ALR_87011990.
Please let us know. Its urgent… your suggestion will be
highly appreciated

Difference between cumulative balance and line items total in FS10N

hi,
when I am executing FS10n, I observed that the cumulative balance amount is not equal to line items total . This is due to some amounts in previous years are varying from the line ltem totals in those periods of previous years.
This is not happening with QA server only Prdn server is facing this problem. Can anybody provide me a way to solve this..!?
Regards,
AJo
I have checked the master data for the GL and the check box for line item display is selected. It has not been changed for years.
Edited by: Anil Jonnalagadda on Oct 22, 2008 10:57 AM

Hi Anil,
The reason for the differences that you are viewing can be various. As the differences are found in the cummulative balance then it means that the differences might have occurred in previous fiscal years. The first stetp is to find when these differences were originated: You can run report SAPF190 (in se38) for previous fiscal years, and company code in question- This report should show the differences with message "Errors" in the log. If differences are found then you have to creeate a message and send it to SAP for further analysis and corrections.(only SAP experts can do this kind of corrections - component FI-GL-GL-X)
Also bear in mind that if you did archiving in previous fiscal years then this would not be an error:
If you already did archiving and secondary index deletion on this accounts with SAPF048I. So this explains why line items balance and GL summary balance differ ! There is no programm error.
See consulting note 81489 which describes this issue:
The balance of an account results from the balance of the open items. In
connection with an archiving that has been carried out, the line item
display - used with cleared items - must not therefore be interpreted as
a balance display. For the balance display, there are separate
correspond to the display balance of the open items from the line item
display.
Having archived and deleted secondary indexes ( with SAPF048I )
for an account you can not use line item drill down as a balance
display any more for a line item managed account.
( as not all line items are existing any more in table BSIS ! )
The transactions meant to display the binding balances are FS10N,
FK10N and FD10N.
They also give you the line items details, but only of those line
items not yet deleted ( by SAPF048I ).
kind regards,
Oscar Diaz

Quantity differences in MC.D and MRN9 report

Hi Experts,
Could you please help me in understanding when there could be a difference in the quantities for a materil in reports MC.D and MRN9.
Also, can you please explain briefly how the values are calculated in these reports.
Best regards,
Raghavendra.

Check your selection criteria...
Give a material and plant and period 01.2014 to 03.2014 in report MC.9.
Then execute
And in report MRN9,
Give the company code and key date 05.03.2014. Enter same material and same plant.
Then execute
You can see my both quantity and value are same in these two report..

Difference between google analytics and bc report?

When I compare GA and BC, BC shows me more than double number of visitors and pageviews than google.
For example June:
Visitors/Pageviews
BC: 1386/4087
GA: 492/1647
Thats so much difference, that I don't know which system I should trust. How can I interpret this data and how many visitors are visiting my site in reality?

Hi,
Our analytics work fundamentally differently like other services (Google, etc) so there can be discrepancies in the data between them.
For example, Google Analytics counts a page visit as a 30 minute session. If the person is inactive for 31 minutes and then clicks again, it counts as 2 visits.
As for BC individual visits are given a 1 hour session before they time out and are counted as a new visitor. Unique visitors are kept unique via a cookie for up to 1 year.
Every time a user interacts with the site this is refreshed (so if you view a page once and then 30 minutes later, the timeout would not occur until 1hr 30 min after you viewed the page the first time).
Google relies on JavaScript to record usage whilst BC does it each time it serves content. We use a number of methodologies to detect bots including user-agent string, repetitive hits from same IP or location amongst others. There's the reason why the numbers are different and cannot be compared. You can compare the results provided either by Business Catalyst for a long period or by Google Analytics, but not one method with the other.
Whilst there may be differences in the exact number of reported visits (as Google Analytics and BC have different ‘count’ processes and Bot handling mechanism’s) the main use for visitor statistics should be to view trends over time, which you should find are similar between GA and BC reporting.
If needing us to look into your report further please log a ticket and we'll advise.
Hope this helps!
-Sidney

Differences between New GL balances and Asset accounting

Hi
We just went live at a customer with a new reporting solution in the New General ledger. We have activated document splitting on the business area (Without mandatory BA) together with the business area scenario. The customer was already live with New GL with document splitting on profit center accounting.
After activation of the BA dimension we transfered all of our assets from the business area blank into their correponding business areas. This went fine for most of our assets except for 2 assets. When changing the business area Aquisition values and acc. depreciations where moved from blank to their target BA in the General ledger view of the documents and likewise in table FAGLFLEX. However for the 2 assets in question the same postings occured but the sending BA is equal to the target BA. The result is that the asset values are moved in AA but not in the general ledger. The asset master change log shows that the BA was changed from blank to 0099 on the conversion date.
This brings out several questions:
Why does these 2 assets behave like this while all the other 5000+ assets behave correctly?
How do we correct it if we can't find the cause? Is there a way to adjust values separately in the GL?
We do expect this inconsistency to cause problems at year-end
Thanks

Hi
How did you transfer the assets from Blank BA to BA 0099?? Was it just changing in AS02??
I believe you would have taken SAP's SLo service for making changes in DOc Splitting.. So, contact SAP for the same
In GL you can rectify using ABF1 i.e. you wil be able to post an entry directly in asset recon accounts... Refer note 69925 for more details
br, Ajay M

Write up postings not tallying between GL and Asset reports

Hi,
Asset details start of the year 1-1-2009
Useful life 10 months.
Acquisition - 1000
Monthly depreciation amount - 100 starting from 1-1-2009
Till March end the total depreciation posted is 300
In April 2009 a write up of 30 was posted with asset value date of 1-1-2009
Now the accumulated depreciation amount shown in the monthly asset balances report (S_ALR_87011963) from Jan to March is short of the write up value of 30 when compared with the Accum depreciation GL account balance report. I believe this is because the write up posting's asset value date is 1-1-2009 hence this write up amount is decreased from the depreciation posting of Jan to April.
However the problem is in the month of April, this difference of 30 between both reports should have been eliminated because the write up value of 30 is appearing in the debit side of GL account balance in april hence eventually should bring both reports in tandem in the month of April. But this is not happening. What happens is that the system takes the accum depreciation amount of 382 and deducting 30 from it and showing 352 in the asset balance report accum depreciation field. May i know the reason for this :-
Accum. Depreciation GL account balance :-
Jan = (CR) Monthly depreciation : 100, Accum. depreciation : 100
Feb = (CR) Monthly depreciation : 100, Accum. depreciation : 200
March = (CR) Monthly depreciation : 100, Accum. depreciation : 300
April = (DR) 30      (CR) Monthly depreciation : 112, Accum. depreciation : 382
The april's monthly depreciation posting includes the prorated depreciation for the write up amount as well which is 12 from Jan to April.
Monthly asset balances report (S_ALR_87011963)
Jan = Accum Depreciation : 70
Feb   = Accum Depreciation : 170
March   = Accum Depreciation : 270
April   = Accum Depreciation : 352

Hi Raja
Have you run T-code AFAR (recalculate depreciation ) for that asset?
Please let me know
Thanks
Sanjeev

Difference between Trail Balance and FBL3n

Hi Alll,
Is there any solution when FBL3N is not tallying with Trail Balance. After raising the billing some times the user want to reverse the transactions and later they will do corrections again rasing the billing.
I found the difference between becaz of cancelation billing.
Can u give some idea i will go through ur advices.
Thanx in advance,
Regs,
Bhaskar

In case of ECC 6.0, Documents are splitted on Profit center level on GL entry level. on this basis FBL3n is a report based on Entry View. There will be several cases that trial , balance sheet will not tally with FBL3n.
You should use FAGLL03 with will give you Gl line items on GL level with profit center and this will tally all you financial reports.
Hope this will be benefecial for you.
Assign point if found useful.
Cheers
Ashok kumar

Difference between enterprise metrics and interactive reporting

All, I am looking for a tool which can handle the KPIs, traffic signalling,digital cockpit etc. Which one is better either enterprise metrics or interactive reporting.I feel interactive reporting has has more scripting on this. Does enterprise metrics doesnt have scripting.will it be better option. Please clarify. Regards R.Prasanna

Check out the licensing doc:
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10464_04/core.904/b13696/toc.htm
Pavna

Difference between Drilldown report and Interactive report

There is no difference between drill down and interactive report, they are the same.
With drilldown reporting, SAP provides you with an interactive information system to let you evaluate the data collected in your application. This information system is capable of analyzing all the data according to any of the characteristics that describe the data. You can also use any key figures you wish to categorize your data. You can display a number of objects for a given key figure, or a number of key figures for a given object. In addition, the system lets you carry out any number of variance analyses (such as plan/actual comparisons, fiscal year comparisons, comparisons of different objects, and so on).
You can produce both simple, data-directed lists (basic reports) and complex, formatted lists in drilldown reporting (form reports).
Drilldown report provides you with comfortable functions for navigating through your data. For example, you can jump to the next level of detail or the next report object on the same level, hide individual levels and switch between the detail and drilldown lists. It also provides a number of additional functions which let you process lists interactively (sorting, conditions, ranking lists, and so on). SAP Graphics, SAPmail and the Excel List Viewer are also integrated into drilldown reporting.
The drilldown functions are divided into three groups which differ in the number of functions available. That way each user can choose the functional level most suited for his requirements.
In addition to the online functions for displaying reports, drilldown reporting also provides functions which let you print reports. A number of formatting functions are available to let you determine the look of your printed reports (page breaks, headers and footers, underscores, and so on).
The menus and the functions available directly on the drilldown report make it easy to use the information system.
What is an Interactive Report?
An interactive report generally works in the following fashion:
1. Basic list is displayed.
2. User double clicks on any valid line
    or
    User selects a line and presses as button on the tool bar.
3. The corresponding event is triggered
4. Then in the code, the line on which action was done, is read.
5. Depending on the values in that selected line, a secondary list is displayed.
6. Steps from 2-5 are repeated till the end.
From the above explanation, I believe, its clear that, the 20th list, will essentially depend on the "selected line" of 19th list. According to your question, you want to move to 20th list directly, without "a prior list". May I know the exact requirement so that, an appropriate solution can be suggested?
Again, your question was, how to move to 20th list directly on pressing of execute button. Its not possible to move to 20th list. You must cross over a basic list, before you can go to a different list level, using the code given by Pavan.
What are Drilldown reports?
The lines of basic list of a drilldown report when clicked, will take the user to the corresponding (standard) object's display.
For eg: Suppose your report's primary component is purchase requisition, (assume you are printing PR details), and the basic list displays details of many PRs.
Eg: when clicked on a particular line of the PR basic list, it takes you to std t-code me53 (display of purchase requisition). This is the 'Drill-down' functionality.
For this, in the at-line selection of your program, as per the above ex: you'll set the parameter ID of PR number BAN (that you can get from Data element) in memory (using set parameter id) and then calling the corresponding transaction (usually skipping initial screen of the std t-code).
Likewise, if it's Material Number (Matnr), you'll be displaying MM03 transaction w.r.t. the line's matnr.
AKSHAT..........

Good, information. But I think you should post these items in Wiki, in place of forum, as here we have Qns & Ans; problems and solutions.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki
[ABAP Development > ABAP General ]
Wiki is the right place for such knowledge base
Thanks!!
Regards,
Vishal.

Difference between class report and interactive report

please give me the differences between classical report and interactive report

Hi,read the following :
In ABAP, there are a total of 7 types of reports. They are:
Classical Reports
Interactive Reports
Logical Database Reports
ABAP query
ALV Reports (ALV stands for ABAP List Viewer)
Report Writer/Report Painter
Views (There are different types of views also)
Classical Reports
These are the most simple reports. It is just an output of data using the Write statement inside a loop.
Classical reports are normal reports. These reports are not having any sub reports. IT IS HAVING ONLY ONE SCREEN/LIST FOR OUTPUT
Interactive Reports
As the name suggests, the user can Interact with the report. We can have a drill down into the report data. For example, Column one of the report displays the material numbers, and the user feels that he needs some more specific data about the vendor for that material, he can HIDE that data under those material numbers.
And when the user clicks the material number, another report (actually sub report/secondary list) which displays the vendor details will be displayed.
We can have a basic list (number starts from 0) and 20 secondary lists (1 to 21).
Logical Database Reports
Logical database is another tool for ABAP reports. Using LDB we can provide extra features for ABAP reports.
While using LDB there is no need for us to declare Parameters.
Selection-screen as they will be generated automatically.
We have to use the statement NODES in ABAP report.
ABAP Query Reports
ABAP query is another tool for ABAP. It provides efficency for ABAP reports. These reports are very accurate.
Transaction Code : SQ01
Report Writer / Report painter
Super users and end users can use Report Painter/Report Writer tools to write their own reports.
Giving them the ability to report on additional fields at their discretion shifts the report maintenance burden to them, saving SAP support groups time and effort normally spent creating and maintaining the reports.
ALV reports
Sap provides a set of ALV (ABAP LIST VIEWER) function modules which can be put into use to embellish the output of a report. This set of ALV functions is used to enhance the readability and functionality of any report output. Cases arise in sap when the output of a report contains columns extending more than 255 characters in length.
In such cases, this set of ALV functions can help choose selected columns and arrange the different columns from a report output and also save different variants for report display. This is a very efficient tool for dynamically sorting and arranging the columns from a report output.
The report output can contain up to 90 columns in the display with the wide array of display options.
There is no difference between drill down and interactive report, they are the same.
With drilldown reporting, SAP provides you with an interactive information system to let you evaluate the data collected in your application. This information system is capable of analyzing all the data according to any of the characteristics that describe the data. You can also use any key figures you wish to categorize your data. You can display a number of objects for a given key figure, or a number of key figures for a given object. In addition, the system lets you carry out any number of variance analyses (such as plan/actual comparisons, fiscal year comparisons, comparisons of different objects, and so on).
*More on Classical Vs Interactive*
Classical Reports
These are the most simple reports. Programmers learn this one first. It is just an output of data using the Write statement inside a loop.
Classical reports are normal reports. These reports are not having any sub reports. IT IS HAVING ONLY ONE SCREEN/LIST FOR OUTPUT.
Events In Classical Reports.
INTIALIZATION: This event triggers before selection screen display.
AT-SELECTION-SCREEN: This event triggers after proccesing user input still selection screen is in active mode.
START OF SELECTION: Start of selection screen triggers after proceesing selection screen.
END-OF-SELECTION : It is for Logical Database Reporting.
Interactive Reports
As the name suggests, the user can Interact with the report. We can have a drill down into the report data. For example, Column one of the report displays the material numbers, and the user feels that he needs some more specific data about the vendor for that material, he can HIDE that data under those material numbers.
And when the user clicks the material number, another report (actually sub report/secondary list) which displays the vendor details will be displayed.
We can have a basic list (number starts from 0) and 20 secondary lists (1 to 21).
Events associated with Interactive Reports are:
1. AT LINE-SELECTION
2. AT USER-COMMAND
3. AT PF<key>
4. TOP-OF-PAGE DURING LINE-SELECTION.
HIDE statement holds the data to be displayed in the secondary list.
sy-lisel : contains data of the selected line.
sy-lsind : contains the level of report (from 0 to 21)
Interactive Report Events:
AT LINE-SELECTION : This Event triggers when we double click a line on the list, when the event is triggered a new sublist is going to be generated. Under this event what ever the statements that are been return will be displayed on newly generated sublist.
AT PFn: For predefined function keys...
AT USER-COMMAND : It provides user functions keys.
TOP-OF-PAGE DURING LINE-SELECTION :top of page event for secondary list.
Reward if found helpful

Reconcile GL account balance between Asset number

Hi Guru
I have a big problem , I have different between GL accont balance and Asset no such as GL account balance = 190,000 THB and Asset balance = 100,000. I want to know which the asset No. is wrong value ? How can I check?

Have a look when the value was correct and when it went wrong.
Run the asset list for the periods, start with one year old, when you have then differences 2 years back when no diffenrences half year later and so on.
When you found where it went wrong look on the G/L account to not normal postings like, document type is not AA or AF, document date is not the last day of the depreciation for depreciation (is not AF), there is a posting without asset number,..............

Diff in customer balance in the report S_ALR_87012172 & fbl5n

Dear Experts,
I have a problem where I am getting difference in customer balance in the report S_ALR_87012172 & fbl5n. I have completed f.07 for the required year, but the problem still exists for some customers.
Kindly help.
regards

Hello,
Refer SAP Note
Note 716640 - Balance display: Drilldown: Total of open items <> balance
Note 323813 - FV60/FB60: document created without secondary index
Note 327139 - Balance display FI: drilldown perfrmnce for balncs
Regards,
Ravi

Difference in GL balance and asset report

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for