Different kernel between systems

Hi,
Is there a problem with working on different kernels (32bit and 64bit) on different system.
for example working with ECC5 and BI7 on 64bit kernel and XI 3.0 and EP7 on 32bit.
does it hurts communicating between the different systems?
Thanks in advance,
Roey

I simply assumed that you ment two different system when you where writing BI7 and EP7.
When you install a BI7-system with both the ABAP and the Java-stack you automatically get an EP7 included in the Java-stack.
That portal installation must have the same SP-level as the rest of the Java-stack.

Similar Messages

Can i do client export import between systems with different patch levels

we want to do a client export import between two systems. As I understand the patch levels should be the same in both for this to happen..
But right now I am in a situation where time is a big constrant. The basis patch level is on par. But the rest are not. Can I do client import successfully at this stage.

The only thing that may stop it working could be additional functionality between the systems.
I work on XI and there is a huge difference between SP12 and SP15. We were able to do the transports between systems, but as Dev was patched before QA, and the transport was reliant on standard settings not being available, it still went though, but we had to transport it again after applying SP15 to QA.
Again, it probably depends on what System you have running on Netweaver...

Different CUOBJ between sales order item and production order

Hi gurus,
Our SAP solution is IS Mill & Variant configuration based, we're using ECC6 as OLTP system mapped to APO PP/DS from which module we trigger the planned order into production order conversion. We're exclusively using the 2 different production type : MTO & MTS. When Sales order based (MTO), it was not possible so far to change the configuration of the production order since following Message no. CO661 was advising the data for the configuration was taken from the allocated SO:
Here is an old thread we'd posted where we were requesting further details about above message: Message CO 661 - Characteristics values were copied - you can only display
We recently upgraded SP level (SAP_BASIS) from 15 to 30 on ECC6 side, SAP Basis Component on SCM side has been remaining unchanged with release 700 level 016.
We now observe the message is unexpectively NOT raising anymore so-that the configuration can be freely adjusted; reason seem to be a different CUOBJ between the SO and its production order; please not the issue do not take place when creating the production order directly from ECC6 through CO08.
Would you please help to clarify the reason of such a behaviour? Thanks in advance.
Remark: snote 1326891 has been patched but w/o any added value as it do not really apply (= CTP not used)
BR,
Pascal.

UP
Below as an illustration CUOBJ from VBAP versus CUOBJ from AFPO
Both WO have been created from APO, difference is the first one was created prior our SP level upgrade. I have to admitt CUOBJ mechanism between ECC & APO is quite unclear, below CUOBJ found when reading planned order data with FM /SAPAPO/RRP_LC_ORDER_GET_DATA (reading executed prior conversion, same outcome when reading prior its creation)
BR,
Pascal.

Work flow Version Different in Q system

Hi ,
Work flow Version in the development version 9 and when transport to quality it should be 16 , but in Q system version is activated for 4 . how can I change to 16 Version in Quality system .

Hi,
It is not a problem if there are different versions between your Development, Test & Production. The versions do NOT have to be aligned...and should not be really.
The way transportation of workflows operates is as folows:
- Create or make a change to a workflow in your development system and transport it to Test.
- If the workflow already exists in Test and it has running instances then a new version of the workflow is created automatically in Test. This is done so that the existing instances (work items) can use the old version and new instances created after the transport can use the new version. If the workflow already exists but had no existing instances (In Test) then it would simply be overwritten with the new transport.
- The same applies when you transport from Test to Production.
You do NOT need to have versions synchronized between systems.
Regards,
Eddie

Transports between systems after support package application

Hi gurus, we need to apply a lot of support packages into the development system and I wanna know if in the meantime we need to "freeze" all transports between systems.
This because the systems (DEV - QA - PRD) are in differente support package level. This until we apply the support packages into the others systems
Thanks in advance.
Ronald.

Yes, any transport which is taking SAP standard code from DEV to QA to PRD should not move if the systems in landscape are on different support pack level. Because it can happen that SAP has done some modification to that standard code in new support pack.
However, anything which is isolated Z-development (like some z-output report or smartforms) can proceed.
But, I suggest , stop moving transports until all systems have same support pack level.
G@urav.

The procedure to change kernel of system with database of one MT and dia. i

Hello
I wander what is procedure to change kernel of system with database instance of one machine type(i.e. HP-UX) and dialog instance of other MT type (i.e. Linux).
I usually change kernel on path /usr/sap/<SID>/SYS/exe/run
But in this case there will be two kernels(where I should copy them

Hi,
As I understand, Your CI/DB on Hp-UX and dialog instance on Linux.. For kernel upgrade check below link:
SAP Kernel update on different Operating System
Thanks
Sunny

Difference between System.err and System.out

Hi Everyone !!!
I could see that System.err is printing an output on the screen as like the System.out.
I can't understand what is System.err.
Can anyone explain me the difference between System.out and System.err

System.out.println -> Sends the output to a standard output stream. Generally monitor.
System.err.println -> Sends the output to a standard error stream. Generally monitor.
To find the difference execute the following program and see the output. You will see how those streams can be handled differently.
public class test
public static void main(String args[])
System.out.println("Standard output Stream message");
System.err.println("Standard error stream message");
Compile the class.
Run the class
First Execution -
java test
Standard output Stream message
Standard error stream message
Second Execution -
java test >op.txt
Standard error stream message
In second execution we diverted only the std output stream and std err stream remained unchanged. i.e., by this way, we can handle error stream separately.
Another typical use of this stream is to produce log or debug messages at runtime and are diverted them to a file where they are archived for later use.<img class="emoticon" src="images/emoticons/shocked.gif" border="0" alt="" width="16" height="16" />

Difference between System.out.println() and out.println()

Hi,
In JSP we want to write the JNLP file contents to a ouput stream using "out.printl()".
The content of the JNLP file i am having in a String.
The "System.out.println()" is printing the correct JNLP file contents but "out.println()" writing wrong contents which are taken from Server JNLP file.
How to solve this problem?
Please guide me in this.
Thanks and Regards:
Dheeraj

Where is the "System.out.println()" running from? I don't think your problem has anything to do with the difference between System.out.println and out.println. Both methods print what is passed to them. It sounds like you are printing two different files because you are running in two different environments.
JSPs run on a server and only have access to files on the server or on a network the server is on. If you are trying to print a file on a user's system, JSP can't do it.

Difference between system copy and Remote Client copy?

Hi,
Can any body suggest me , What are the major difference between System copy and Remote Client Copy.
As per my knowledge , Both are different
1.In system copy entire data recovered mean copy from Source to target
2.In Remote client copy All Client data can't me import if you choose SAP_ALL profile also
I hope Transaction data and user data can't copied
Anybody share this Question and Give me some idea about this
If anybody give brief explanation that is very gratefull.
regards,
Balaram

Hi,
System copy will replicate all database from source to target system.
In remote copy only client in which you are performing the copy will get refresh. Also, remote client copy will be done between systems on same patch level. with SAP_ALL profile you can bring all data in target system including your transactional data.
Thanks
Sunny

The difference between system restore and last good known configuration

hi,
what is the difference between system restore and last good known configuration.
in which situation you use system restore ,and in which situation you use last good known configuration.
very short answer wil be enough.
thanks
johan
h.david

Last Known Good Configuration deals only with Starting Windows eg. a bad registry or incorrect driver is preventing Windows to start.It recovers the registry settings of HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet
While System Restore uses restore points to return your system files and settings to an earlier point in time without affecting personal files. Restore points are created automatically every week, and just before significant system events, such as the installation
of a program or device driver. You can also create a restore point manually.You can undone system restore but there is no such option in Last Known Good Configuration.
Last Known Good Configuration is disabled in Windows 8 or,Windows 8.1 by default.
Try using Last Known Good Configuration if you can't start Windows, but it started correctly the last time you turned on the computer.
Try using System Restore to return the system to an earlier point in time when things worked correctly.
S.Sengupta, Windows Entertainment and Connected Home MVP

What is the difference between "System" buttons and boolean buttons?

I'm writing a VI with an event structure that allows me to push different buttons to control external instruments, but I found two types of buttons worked: "System" buttons and "Boolean" buttons. On the surface, the functionality seems the same: I can write the VI so that either one works, and they work in the same way, but which one is right?
Here is a little more info on what I'm doing. I have a case structure that has one "timeout" case, which just measures the position of a movable stage. Another case, if a "system"-type button is pressed, moves the stage to an absolute position. Another case activated by a "boolean"-type button moves the stage to the zero point. I could switch these and it would still work, but I don't understand how the buttons are different.
Also, right now I'm using the "run continuously" function so that the loop just repeats. Is this the right way to do it? I could put everything inside a loop, and make my own stop button for it. Would that be better? Worse? --> I think I found the answer to my own question: run continuously will stop and start the code at each instance, so a while loop will be better because it doesn't start and stop repeatedly. (True?)
Thanks,
Karl
Message Edited by Karl T. on 03-31-2008 05:43 PM

Karl,
You never want to design your program to have to use the run continuously button. It is more for debugging than anything else. Using a while loop with your own stop button is the preferred method of doing things.
The System, 3-D, and Classic Booleans all basically work the same. The appearance is different. The System buttons look like your OS buttons that you see on all your other programs. The 3-D were introduced in LV6 and remain standard across different OS's and are not affected by System color changes or System theme changes. The classics behave similarly to the 3-D, but they are the older controls that existed prior to LV6 and have been kept for legacy's sake.
There are arguments for using system controls vs. 3-D controls (I don't think most people use the classic controls much anymore). So, you really have to make a personal decision as to which you prefer to use. NI pushes the system controls, but you'll notice there is a large number of controls which are not available in the system pallette. I have made versions that look like system controls, but they do not automatically update for theme or system color changes.

Can two different SRM clients systems connect to one R/3 Back-end system?

Hello,
Trying to developing SRM Co-Exist/Global strategy, based on the following scenario:
1. Two different SRM client systems, each at DIFFERENT SRM Version/Release Level. SRM system "A" runs in Stand-Alone and Extend Classic Scenario mode. SRM system "B" runs in Classic Scenario mode
2. Two different R/3 back-end systems, each with SAME R/3 4.7 Version/Release Level.
Question 1: Can the two (2) different SRM client systems be connected to one (1) of the R/3 back-end systems?
Question 2: Are there any Basis Plug-In (PI_BASIS) issues/difficulties to consider from either the SRM client or R/3 back-end side?
Question 3: Does each SRM client need it own unique transaction document type(s) and number range(s) definitions?
Question 4: Are there any other difficulties, for example, with RFC and Partner Profile related definitions and what are the steps to address/resolve difficulties?
Please advise and thanks in advance for your feedback!
Regards,
Ed
Edited by: Ed Shigo on Mar 16, 2009 6:40 AM

Question 1: Can the two (2) different SRM client systems be connected to one (1) of the R/3 back-end systems?
They can be connected
Question 2: Are there any Basis Plug-In (PI_BASIS) issues/difficulties to consider from either the SRM client or R/3 back-end side?
Make sure that you have unique consumer entries for Middleware for Material replication, RFCs etc
Question 3: Does each SRM client need it own unique transaction document type(s) and number range(s) definitions?
Yes you need to have them.
Question 4: Are there any other difficulties, for example, with RFC and Partner Profile related definitions and what are the steps to address/resolve difficulties?
Don't see any difficulties as long as the a structured approach is followed.

Differences between System.gc() and Runtime.gc() ?

differences between System.gc() and Runtime.gc() ?

None!
P.S. I have only found one reason to use System.gc(). For some obscure reason it seems that if one invokes System.gc() when a Swing application is about to be iconized it substantially reduces the delay experienced when de-iconizing the application!
Several reasons for this have been suggested but I have found none that really explain why it works but it does work!
Edited by: sabre150 on Sep 28, 2007 10:23 AM

Loading two different SAP BW system from one SAP R/3

Hi all,
is it possible to load the data from one SAP R/3 4.7 to two different SAP BW systems in parallel?:
A) BW 2.1C
B) BW 3.5
I mean not because R/3 has for example version of R/3 Plug-In which is compatible only to one R/3 Plug-In installed on BW side.
Are there any other restrictions? Ar there any workarounds how to hande this situation?
Thanks,
m./

Hi dear,
I think you shouldn't have any problem!
Look at OSS Note 775568 'Two and more BW systems against one OLTP system' to have more details...
"R/3 has for example version of R/3 Plug-In which is compatible only to one R/3 Plug-In installed on BW side"...what's your plug-in version in R/3 ? I can't understand what do you mean with "R/3 Plug-In installed on BW side" !!!
Hope it helps!
Bye,
Roberto
...and please don't forget to reward the answers...it's THE way to say thanks here, my dear colleague !

Can we have different products between B2B and B2C

Hi Experts,
I have one basic question. Can we maintain the different products between B2B and B2C users. Because we have requirement is B2B users should get all the products, but B2C users should get limited products. Is there way we can setup like this to meet the requirements. Please let me know. Thank you very much in advance.
With Regards,
Sudheer.

You do this by creating two Product Catalogs (PCAT_B2C and PCAT_B2B, for example) Then, in ShopAdmin you assign the B2C site to PCAT_B2C and the B2B to the PCAT_B2B.
Another possibility, although not very user friendly is to use one PCAT and allow B2B users to add items to their cart directly, even thought they're not in the PCAT. The drawback here is that they MUST know the exact number and they can not search for them. I can give more info on this if you feel it might work for you, but it is not a very good option as a general rule.

Different kernel between systems

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for