Different useful life in depreciation area - same depreciation

Hello,
I have the same depreciation key but different useful life for some assets master data, but when I calculate the depreciation, in the second depreciation area I have the same depreciation amounts like in the first depreciation area. The second depreciation area posts depreciation only...
Can you help me please?
Regards,
Mike

Hi Mike,
to answer this question you should at least provide detailed information about the depreciation key used. For instance depreciating with a stated percentage rate wouldn´t consider the useful life, same depreciation amount would be the result. And there are several other possibilities.
Regards,
Markus

Similar Messages

  • Are the Tcodes which we use for work flow are same in ecc and crm

    Are the Tcodes which we use for work flow are same in ecc and crm

    Yes they are! the same enjoy!
    Regards
    Tatenda I H Chaibva!

  • FI-AA new depreciation area - treatment depreciation previous years

    Hi,
    In the FI-AA module , next to the already existing depreciation area 01 for Fiscal reporting with full integration of postings to FI-GL, I have created a new depreciation area 20 for te purpose of Management reporting which takes over its APC values from depreciation area 01 and does only post different Depreciation values to FI-GL.
    Subsequently I updated the data for the new depreciation area in teh already existing asset master data records ( different depreciation keys).
    The depreciation calculation and resulting postings for the current year are correct.
    However I wonder what will happen with the data for the previous years;
    when i look in the asset explorer i do see for the new depr area in the "posted values" tab that it reports for the previous years planned depreciation amounts . However we do not want to post these amounts in the previous years because these years have already been closed and audited.
    Will we be able at the end of this fiscal year to changeover FI-AA to the new fiscalyear ( transactions AJAB, AJRW) without the system complaining with error messages that we first need to also perform the depreciation postings for all the previous years in this new depreciation area ?
    Many thanks in advance for your much appreciated help.
    Kind Regards,
    Arjan

    Can you please tell me how you added the new depreciaton area to the existing asset masters in those classes ?  To get the new depreciation area to show up?  We just did the same thing and we're only working with assets that were acquired this year - but we can't get the new depreciation area added to the assets that already existed in those classes.  If you figured out how to do that it would sure help us out.  I look forward to your response.  We're in 4.7.
    Thanks
    Karla
    Never mind found it from reading other posts.  I used AFBN and it worked.  Thanks
    Edited by: Karla Trevithick on Sep 17, 2009 12:39 AM

  • Depreciation area wise depreciation posting

    Hi Experts,
    We are using PARALLEL LEDGER for USGAAP reporting requirement. The client has weekly posting period under USGAAP reporting and thus they will perform all the month end activities as "weekend activity" in this non-leading ledger.
    This will also require WEEKLY posting of depreciation run for USGAAP ledger only.
    Is there any standard way wherein we can do posting only for PARALLEL LEDGER by select the weekly posting period and USGAAP depreciation area. Or can it be done through a development??
    Thanks in advance
    Sourabh

    This scenario is not possible

  • Non-leading ledger depreciation area posting depreciation expense at current exchange rate - need to be historical

    Hi all,
    We are facing an issue where we have a depreciation area "02" posting to our non-leading ledger. It is set to post depreciation only.
    I noticed the depreciation expense is hitting the non-leading ledger and translating (CAD) into group currency (USD) at the current exchange rate. But in the leading ledger, the rate is historical.
    How can we have the non-leading ledger post at historical exchange rates for depreciation postings?
    thx..

    Hi Jay,
    Check the exchange rate type & translation date maintained for the non leading ledger in OB22.
    Regards,
    Mukthar

  • Change in Useful life of asset in mid year, but the previous posted depreciation should not be changed

    Dear Experts,
    I have a requirement in one of my client, We need to extend the useful life of asset in mid of an asset fiscal year and the depreciation which was posted in the previous should not be changed.
    Requirement:
    Useful life of asset  is to be extended after completing depreciation for 4 years and in-between the current asset fiscal year. Provided the present asset value has to be taken as the new book value of the asset and the depreciation posted henceforth to be posted based on the new asset value till the remaining useful life.
    Previously posted depreciation should be unchanged.
    Analysis:
    1.      The fiscal Year followed - October to September.
    2.      The useful life of asset will be changed, and the depreciated value posted till 31/mar 2014 will have the old depreciation value ( based on the original acquisition value)
    3.      The Depreciation key used in of type LINR (linear), depreciation value will be calculated based on the Book value till the asset value becomes ZERO at the end of useful life of the asset.
    4.      We can change the useful life of the asset at the end of a Asset fiscal year say FY- 2014, if this is done the existing configuration will take the Book value of the asset at the end of the Fiscal as the asset value and the new depreciation will be calculated based on the new useful life of the asset. The asset value will become ZERO at the end of the newly changed Useful Life.
    5.      But the requirement is that the useful life of the asset will be changed exactly half way in between existing Asset fiscal (i.e., 31/03/2014), if this is done system will change the depreciation value based on the new useful life ( since the Dep Key is LINR), but the depreciation value will change from the fiscal start say October 2013 to September 2014 ), which will not satisfy the requirement of the client. Since the depreciation which is already posted from October 2013 to March 2014 should not be changed.
    Note:
    1. We are not willing to retire the asset and create a new asset with the remaining book value as asset value and start depreciation.
    Kindly let me know if the requirement can be fulfilled without retiring the asset.

    Dear All,
    This requirement has been completed.
    1. I created New Multi level valuation method with base 26 ( Net book value w/o Revaluation ).
    2. New depreciation key was created and the above method was assigned to it. I never changed the Base method.
    3. new interval was created in the depreciation area, with this created dep key and extended the useful life of the asset. The depreciation was calculated according to the requirement.
    Originally the asset had useful life of  5 Years, I changed the asset useful life to 8 years now with new Depreciation key 2001.
    Depreciation was already posted to the asset till 04- 2013 for an amount of 148.27 SAR.
    Net Book value carried forward to 2013 = 1575.56 SAR
    Depreciation already posted till 4th period =   148.27 SAR
    Current Net book value after useful life extension           = 1427.29 SAR .
    Now the new depreciation key 2001 with Multilevel method 201, will take this Net-book value as Asset value and will depreciate along the useful life of the asset till it becomes zero.
    Planned depreciation of 2013 ( remaining 6 months) = 166.24 SAR
    Planned depreciation of 2014 = 225.96 SAR
    Planned depreciation of 2015 = 225.96 SAR
    Planned depreciation of 2016 = 225.96 SAR
    Planned depreciation of 2017 = 225.96 SAR
    Planned depreciation of 2018 = 225.96 SAR
    Planned depreciation of 2019 = 131.25 SAR
    Total      = 1427.29 SAR ( the Asset value becomes zero at the end of its remaining useful life.
    The previously posted depreciation from 01.01.2013 to 30.04.2013 was untouched.

  • Complete Depreciation in the Last Year of Useful life

    I am trying to create following scenario in SAP using declining balance method where the percentage is calculated from the useful life...example below;
    A printer has APC of 100 TRY and itu2019s useful life is 3 years,
    The depreciation percentage is calculated as 1/3 = 0.33 * 2 = 0.66
    However if the percentage rate is greater than 50% than 50% is the maximum taken as the annual percentage rate.
    2010u2019s depreciation = 100*50%=50 TRY (NBV balance 50 TRY)
    2011u2019s depreciation = 50*50%=25 TRY (balance 25 TRY)
    2012u2019s depreciation =25 TRY (last yearu2019s depreciation = net book value u2013 accumulated depreciation)
    When trying to replicate this scenario in the system; it does the following;
    2010u2019s depreciation = 100*50%=50 TRY (NBV balance 50 TRY)
    2011u2019s depreciation = 50*50%=25 TRY (balance 25 TRY)
    2012u2019s depreciation =12.5 TRY
    2013u2019s depreciation = 12.5 TRY
    Even though the useful life of the asset is only 3 years u2013 it carries forward the remaining depreciation to the next fiscal year...this is not what I want. Do you know if there is a parameter in the depreciation key that forces the final year of useful life to take the remaining depreciation amount.

    Hi Bernard,
    Yes  - I  have a changeover applied in my first phase to "changeover at end of useful life" then in the next phase I have "changeover in planned life" with immediate depreciation.
    The problem with this is that the remaining depreciation is only applied in the next year...however I need it to be applied in the last year fo useful life. The changeover options do not allow for "changover within planned life" unless a percentage is supplied for when net book value reaches a certain percentage.
    However, I cannot determine a percentage as the useful life of my assets will always change...resulting in the NBV percentage to be different by asset class..
    If there is a way to do this without activating the BADI that would be great.
    Regards
    S.Vekaria

  • Asset Depreciation - Depreciation to the date + Percentage from useful life

    Hi Asset Accounting Experts,
    I have a business requirement for depreciation as follows in depreciation calculation.
    Aquisition Month    : Depreciation to the date
    remaining Months   : Straight Line Depreciation - Ordinary: percentage from useful life
    Retirement Month   : Depreciation To the date
    Eg: Aquisition value = 12000     Useful Life 10 years  i.e Depreciation per month 100
    Asset Aquired in 20.01.2009 (Period 1)
    Retired in 12.04.2009 (Period 4)
    Depreciation should post as follows
    Period 1 - 100*11/31 =   35.48
    Period 2 -                      100.00
    Period 3 -                      100.00
    Period 4 -  100*12/30 =   40.00
    I would really greatful if someone can help me on this.
    Thanks in advance.
    Chandimal

    Hi,
    You can define this in your depreciation key.
    Check depreciation to day check box. System will calculate the depreciation from date of capitalization if you have define multilevel method , depreciation from capitalisation date. Also choose base method depreciation from useful life. Define life in Asset master , post the entry and check the depreciation behaviour.
    Check with this system will post the depreciation as per your requirement.
    Regards
    pankaj Pandey

  • Error: Parallel depreciation area 31 is not posted

    Hi experts,
    Hi have customized 5 depreciation areas:
    01 book depreciation in local currency
    30 deferred balance sheet in local currency (for different useful life)
    31 deferred balance sheet in group currency
    32 book depreciation in group currency
    60 derived depreciation area
    I specified that 30 will get values from 01; 31 will get from 30; 32 will get from 01; plus one derived for 01 and 30 difference.
    Then when I entered asset values in F-02 using transaction type 100, I get this error. Please help. Thank you.
    Parallel depreciation area 31 is not posted
    Message no. AA565
    Diagnosis
    The asset to be posted does not manage parallel depreciation area 31, or transaction type  that you are using is limited to certain depreciation areas, and does not contain depreciation area 31. This is incorrect.
    System Response
    Posting is rejected.
    Procedure
    Check the asset and the transaction type.

    Hi John.
    In "Specify use of Parallel Currency" setup your currencies type/Valuation view.
    In Currency Type/Valuation View, against area 31 maintain it for 31 (Group Currency Group Valuation) and against area 40 maintain 40 (Hard Currency). Transfer of Deprecation terms setup from Deprecation
    area “01”.  Setup like below.
    Now go to below
    Maintain your currency as per requirement and see if changes are updated as per above configuration (I mean valuation id is "01" for your depreciation area, try to execute your transaction and let me know if it’s working.
    After that go to define depreciation area and see if your depreciation area setting for 01, 31 and 40 is same. Please try to check in Sandbox first.
    Please mark it as correct if your problem resolves, so it would be useful for other as well.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Sudhir Harale

  • Parallel Depreciation area

    Hi Fi gurus!
    Two Depreciation Area is required, one for Local Reporting and one for Group reporting. Depreciation area 1 has a minimum of 5000USD while Depreciation area 2 has only 500USD minimum amount acceptable for capitalization. In addition, they have different useful life. Any idea how to handle this in SAP?
    Please throw some light.
    Rose

    this t. ype do work in COD USD but not in USD2. Please advise what are i am missing here
    Regards
    Bali
    I checked the answer provide by yourself and
    1) your first reply - it look exactly same as you advise
    2) Also check the T.code OAXE and maintain the t.type 700 to dep area 99
         The T. Type 700 is assigned to COD GBP2 and only 01 is there with display selection.
    When I try to assigned Dep area 99 and error popped stated Transaction type 600: parallel depreciation area 98 is missing
    Please advise
    Regards
    Bali
    Edited by: Bali1972 on May 27, 2008 5:17 PM

  • Decimal places are not permitted for asset useful life

    Dear SAP experts,
    I need to post a new net book value on a new depreciation area 50 for fixed assets. The new deprecation for depreciation area 50 will start in July 2011 on all existing (also fully depreciated or to be disposed) assets with a different useful life unlike the book deprecation for depreciation area 01. The depreciation method for depreciation area 50 is straight line.
    I have a requirement to assign the new useful life for the depreciation area 50 which may contain decimals, for example 5.5 years. Basically, I need to depreciate the asset for the remaining 6 months of 2011 and the entire 2012 to 2016.
    SAP does not allow decimals on asset useful life (Decimal places are not permitted, Message no. 00011).
    Have you come accross a similar situation? How can that be managed via depreciation methods and keys?
    Please advise.
    Thank you in advance,
    Inna

    Hi Inna,
    You can define your useful life of 5.5 years for the depreciation area 50 as follows:
    Useful life : 5
    period : 6
    here, useful life(5) represents 5 years and period(6) as 6 months which gives you 5.5 years starting depreciation from Depreciation calculation start date.
    Kind Regards,
    Mehul

  • Parallel depreciation area not posted  when trying to settle an order.

    Hi,
    We have requirement of using parallel currencies in one of the cocode.So I havee set up parallel currencies in AA as well.
    We have three currencies EUR as Local currency, USD as Group Currency and CHF as Index-based Curremcy.
    I have set up Depreciation areas
    01 Book depreciation areau2014posts in real timeu2014leading ledger 0L
    02 Book depreciation area for CHFu2014posts Dep only u2013Z1 european ledger
    10u2014Statutory Depreciation areau2014Do not post
    19u2014Derived Dep area (01-10)
    29u2014Dervied dep area (02-01) Posts APC onlyu2014Z1 european leading ledger
    30-Consolidated Balancesheet in local currencyu2014do not post
    31u2014consolidated balance sheet in group currencyu2014do not post
    32u2014Book dep in Group currency u2013do not post--assigned USD in OABT
    42-Book dep in Group currency-do not post --assigned CHF in OABT
    I have selected Indentical and TTr check box for dep areas 02,31,32, & 42.
    I have done the consistency check and it shows no errors in depreciation area set up.
    When Trying to settle an internal order in KO88 to a fixed asset I am getting the below error message.
    *Data inconsistency: Parallel depr. area is not posted Message no. AAPO104*
    Diagnosis
    For chart of depreciation ZCH, you defined this area (or these areas) as parallel depreciation areas for depreciation area 01. In the current transaction, however, not all of these areas are posted. This is not allowed.
    Procedure
    Check if the transaction type is limited to certain depreciation areas. If there is such a limitation, add the missing depreciation areas for the transaction type.
    Check if the asset that is being posted manages all these depreciation areas.
    I have checked the transaction types and they are not limited to any depreciation areas. I have activated depreciatio areas in the asset class and maintained the account determination nad assigned g/l accounts.
    Please help me if I have missed any settings.
    Thanks & Regards
    Nirmala

    Hi,
    AAPO104 is generally a customizing error:  the check points to consider are generally the following regarding parallel currencies: I think you have checked most of them already...
    * The parall. dep. area must have the same settings as the original area (e.g. allowing APC).
    * The parall. dep. area must set for identical values take over.
    * The parall. dep. area must set for identical parameter take over.
    * The parall. dep. area must be assigned to the currency type which is defined as parallel in FI in trx. OB22 (e.g. 30).
    * The parall. dep. area must be activated in the asset class (transaction OAYZ)
    Furthermore, a problem can also be that in OABT you have a parallel area customized, taking value from another area, which is customized and seen in T093. If for example this parall.area is missing on your Asset Under Construction but is there on the final asset this obviously will create the error AAPO104, too.
    In any case check your settings are correct in regards to parallel depreciation areas. They must manage same values as original areas. If they don't it cannot be a parallel area.
    Maybe you also need to consider the information in SAP note 317806.
    Also, looking at your different depreciation areas above, it looks that you have set up a ledger scenario (areas 01 , 02 and 29). I wonder, do you have a correct set up for the parallel currency for your ledger scenario? If I am not mistaken, I don't see a derived parallel currency area. Could this be the problem?
    Regards,
    Brigitte

  • Difference between Groups books/IFRS and Local Stats Depreciation Areas

    Hi
    We created assets with difference useful life between Groups and Stats of which the asset depreciation difference between two dep areas is posted in to seperate GL account starts with "S" used for local stats purpose. Any idea how to avoid this difference getting posted to other stats GL account.
    We also tried to have same useful life between dep areas. But still i can see depreciation difference is getting posted in dep area 30.
    Kindly help.
    REgards,
    Hari

    Hi Hari
    Welcome to SDN.. This is standard behaviour....
    If you have 2 dep areas posting to FI, then you need to create a 3rd depre area as Delta Dep Area which manages the differential posting between Dep Area 01 and Parallel Dep area
    Only solution to avoid this is to have the Parallel Dep Area as STatistical Dep Area i.e. It should not post to FI (Indicator 0 in OADB)
    br, Ajay M

  • Useful life different bewteen straight line and declining balance

    Have any one used different useful life between straight line and declining balance ?
    Does it work correctly?
    Thanks

    HI,
    Please check in the given path:
    Financial Accounting ->Asset Accounting - Valuation- Determine Depreciation Areas in the Asset Class
    Check here for your asset class, any value maintained in the fields useful life.
    Mostly you enter default Useful life for each asset class.

  • Creating depreciation area for non leading ledger

    Hi,
    I want to configurate a depreciation area for a non-leading ledger. This is my scenario:
    01-Accounting area leading ledger. Group legder: 0L (on line)
    02- Accounintg area non leading ledger. Group ledger N1 (Area posts APC only directly)
    03-Depreciation non leading ledger. Grouo ledger N1 (Area posts depreciation only)
    Is it correct to created this 2 areas for non leading ledger?
    Thanks,
    Cecilia

    Hi Cecilia,
    additionally to my colleagues:
    For each additional set of accounting principles, you create one real  and one derived depreciation area.                                                                               
    Real Depreciation Area:                                                                               
    1. In Customizing for Financial Accounting (New), choose Asset Accounting  - Valuation  - Depreciation Areas  -Define Depreciation  Areas.                                                                               
    2.  Assign both depreciation areas to the same ledger group.                                                                               
    The ledger group you assign them to is not allowed to contain the leading ledger.                                                                               
    3.  In the Posting in G/L field, choose Area Posts Depreciation Only.                                                                               
    Derived Depreciation Area:                                                                               
    It is easiest to create the derived depreciation area using the Wizard.                                                                               
    4. In Customizing for Financial Accounting (New), choose Asset Accounting - Valuation - Depreciation Areas - Set Up Areas for Parallel Valuation.                                                                               
    5. In the Posting in G/L field, choose Area Posts APC Only.  Specify that this derived depreciation area represents the difference between the real depreciation area for parallel accounting and the        
    master depreciation area.                                                                               
    You do not have to set up a separate account set for these new depreciation areas. Instead you use the account set of the master depreciation area. In this scenario, you do not have to create any new  accounts in the chart of accounts or in the company code. You also do  not have to create a new financial statement version.                                                                               
    So a typical dep.area setting for a parallel ledger at you is like: 
    T093
    AFABER ABVOR1 AFABE1 ABVOR2 AFABE2 BUHBKT LDGRP_GL
    01...............................00...........................00............1.............0L
    02...............................00...........................00............3.............N1
    03..................+...........01............ - ............02............6.............N1
    Regards Bernhard

Maybe you are looking for

  • Urgent, compilation problem in Unix

    SET JSRCPATH=D:\app\a\*.java D:\app\b\*.java D:\app\c\*.java D:\d\*.java D:\app\e javac %JSRCPATH%\*.java My makefile script above is OK in WinNT environment. But when I use it in Unix (of course I have changed the directory path), it has problems: I

  • Java.sql.SQLException: Invalid column type when extending VO

    Hi, I'm getting java.sql.SQLException: Invalid column type when I'm extending a VO. The VO is the base query for a LOV. I'm not adding any columns, I'm just changing the from and the where. I'm not touching any java code. When I click on the LOV torc

  • BO XIR2 SP3 FP3.3 - vertical alignment of 1st column of 2nd page ignored

    We have webi reports that have all cells set to vertical alignment bottom. If the report spans more than one page, the first column of the second page reverts to vertical alignment center for all cells in the column. All other columns remain with bot

  • Capture Debit Memo in J1iin

    Can somebody tell me how to capture Debit Memo in J1iin ?

  • Defining Distribution Functions

    Dear, In SOP base planning i define "Dstribution Functions". Can any one help what its and how functionally it works? I define this thing under path : Production - Basic Data - Bill of Material - Item Data- Item Data from Related Application Areas -