Difficulty in selecting between HV segmentation and classical(LV) segmentat

Hi All,
I am in a dilema to select between the HV seg. or the old LV one. Can anyone tell me is it feasable to work on LV segmentation with 20million plus BPs.We need it only for BP segmentation.Will the performance be affected drastically if we use LV seg.I am just trying to understand the pros and cons of both the solutions(i.e, hv and lv seg). It would be great if someone can give me more clarity on this so that we can choos ethe right solution for our client.
thanks!

Hi,
starting with CRM 7.0 EhP1 there will be one single UI for HV and LV. You decide via the usage which one is used. However, if you want to use HV segmentation, you must have a TREX server up and running, whereas LV runs without. I dont know exactly what you mean by "Is there any such capacity for LV seg to be used". HV segmentation will always be faster.
Best Regards
--klaus

Similar Messages

How do I get my 8600 premium printer to auto select between tray 1 and tray 2?

How do I get my 8600 premium printer to auto select between tray 1 and tray 2? Right now, i have to pull out tray 1 to get the printer to feed tray 2.

Hi Retrotriker,
Follow the steps below to properly configure your paper trays.
1. Touch (right arrow), touch Setup, touch Preferences, and then select Default Tray
2. Select Tray 2 as the Default tray
3. Open Printers and Faxes
4. Right click on printer, and then select Printer Properties
5. Click on Device Settings tab
6. On this screen set the media type you have assigned to each tray (Example: tray 1 - Envelopes & Tray 2 - Letter)
7. Click Apply, and then Ok
8. When you have an envelope you are printing it will pull from Tray 1
9. When you have a letter you are printing it will pull from Tray 2
I am an HP employee.
Say Thanks by clicking the Kudos Star in the post that helped you.
Please mark the post that solves your problem as "Accepted Solution"

Difference Between Rollback Segments and UNDO Tablespace

Hi guys,
Can you tell difference between Rollabck segments and UNDO Tablespaces.
I think that rollback Segemnts and UNDO tablespaces are similar both are used for storing before imags of data, which is going to be modified.
but my question still both the rollback abck segments and UNDO tablespaces exists.
why and what is the reason of both existing and at what time, we can use..them at which scenarios's
Regards,
Pavan Kumar N

Undo segments in undo tablespaces, introduced in 9i, are the successor of rollback segments.
They are automatically managed by Oracle.
Rollback segments exist for reasons of backwards compatibility.
That said, you should switch to undo segments and stop using rollback segments.
Other than that: could you please avoid rehearsing the complete documentation in this forum?
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA

Determining which PCA to use between new-GL and classic EC-PCA

I tried to use 1kek to transfer AR and AP from FI to PCA but failed with message saying "Document Splitting is Activated".
We are considering using PCA to make B/S and P/L of several business unit in a company. We are using SAP 6.0. After looking for the references, I understood that I can use new-GL or EC-PCA(classic PCA) for Profit Center Accounting. I wonder which way is the best and easiest one to achieve my company's object.
As I understood if I activate document splitting, it means I use new-GL for PCA, and I should use table FAGLFLEXA of FI instead of GLPCA of EC-PCA.
I'd like to use new-GL because it's "new" and convenient, hopefully. But I found several problems using new-GL to make financial reports.
The first problem was that I couldn't make allocation with accounts which cannot be manually input like AA accounts(Building, Machine, etc.), AR/AP or materials. When I operate transaction FAGLGA35, no effect occurs on those accounts.
And the second problem is that I couldn't find a way to make a report which has accounts list on its first column and profit center list on its first row. It's surely because I'm a newbie in SAP
I think everybody trying to use new_GL encounter this problem and it's wired because I couldn't find any thread about this.
And If I decide to use EC-PCA and make allocation on GLPCA, I think I should make some CBO to transfer AR/AP to EC-PCA. Is there any other possible solution?
I have a lot of things to ask but I'm not even sure what I know and don't.
Thanks for you guru's great help.

The following notes will help you in understanding the set up of PCA in New GL with Classic PCA (EC-PCA): <b>OSS Norte no 826357</b>
You want to know
For release SAP ERP, the Profit Center Accounting was integrated into the new G/L accounting. The solution is as follows:
SAP delivers the 'Profit Center' and the 'Partner Profit Center' as fixed characteristics that are posted on the original FI postings. The data is not updated in another ledger as in the classic Profit Center Accounting.
As a result of integration of the Profit Center Accounting into the new G/L accounting, new functions such as 'Document Splitting' are available. Using the function 'Document Splitting' (online document split), you can create balance sheets for company codes as well as for other entities such as the profit center. The balance is then set to 0 for each document for the profit center.
Integrating the G/L accounting and the Profit Center Accounting into the one application also removes the time and effort needed to reconcile G/L accounting and PCA.
When implementing the new G/L accounting in Release SAP ERP, we recommend that all new customers map the Profit Center within the new G/L accounting by activating the scenario FIN_PCA (profit center update). It is not advisable to activate the classic Profit Center Accounting in parallel and consequently update parallel data volumes.
Detailed information about setting Profit Center Accounting in the New General Ledger:
Define the update of the characteristics 'Profit Center' and 'Partner Profit Center' in the ledger by selecting the scenario 'Profit center update' (Customizing: Financial Accounting (New) -> Financial Accounting Basic Settings (New) -> Ledgers -> Ledger -> Assign Scenarios and Customer-Defined Fields to Ledgers).
If you want to use the document splitting, you can define the field 'Profit center' as a splitting characteristic in the document splitting (Customizing: Financial Accounting (New) -> General Ledger Accounting (New) -> Business Transactions -> Document Splitting -> Define Document Splitting Characteristics for General Ledger Accounting). Set the 'Zero balance' indicator again for the added field 'Profit Center'. You can now create balance sheets on the profit center. You must also activate the Mandatory Field check to ensure that the profit center is set in all postings. If you want to display balance sheet items at profit center level (for example, receivables and payables) but you do not require complete balance sheets, we recommend that you do not set the indicator 'Zero balance' and 'Mandatory Field check'.
If you already used classic Profit Center Accounting as an SAP R/3 customer but you now want to use Profit Center Accounting in the new general ledger, you can continue to use classic Profit Center Accounting in parallel to the profit center update scenario in the new G/L accounting in the interim. However, we do not recommend you do this on a long-term basis due to the increased data volume and the increased time and effort required.
However, if the classic Profit Center Accounting continues to play a leading role for you, we recommend that you do not activate the document splitting in the new G/L accounting, and not for other entities such as the segment either. This is because the classic Profit Center Accounting uses certain functions of the classic general ledger that are no longer available with active document splitting (for example, transaction F.5D, Calculate Balance Sheet Adjustment).
See the following information for details about the differences between the function of PCA in new G/L accounting and in classic PCA and for details about the effects of new G/L accounting on the posting behavior in classic PCA. Even if mapped into new G/L accounting, PCA always occurs within a controlling area. SAP does not support cross-controlling area PCA. The derivation of profit center and partner profit center with the different business processes when you use the new G/L Accounting is identical to the classic Profit Center Accounting. Details about the differences are available in the following.
1. Set the proposal profit center for additional balance sheet and P&L accounts.
Release SAP ERP 2004:
           Profit center scenario in the new G/L accounting is active, classic Profit Center Accounting is not active: If you have to set a profit center on balance sheet and P&L accounts, make entries manually, use FI substitution or implement the BADI AC_DOCUMENT. Note that the system calls the BADI AC_DOCUMENT only for postings using the accounting interface (for example, MM and SD postings), but it is not called for FI postings.
           Profit center scenario in new G/L accounting and classic PCA is active: Transactions 3KEH and 3KEI are available in the classic Profit Center Accounting for maintaining a proposal profit center for balance sheet accounts and P&L accounts. Transactions 3KEH and 3KEI also exist in SAP ERP2004 and function in the same way as in R/3: In other words, you can use the settings in transaction 3KEH to control the update in classic Profit Center Accounting, and the transactions set a proposal profit center where necessary. Keep in mind that the profit center information is therefore affected in new G/L accounting by settings in classic Profit Center Accounting.
Release SAP ERP 2005:
           Transactions 3KEH and 3KEI (from classic Profit Center Accounting) for maintaining proposal profit centers for balance sheet and P&L accounts are no longer used to set the profit center.
           Profit center scenario in the new G/L accounting is active, classic Profit Center Accounting is not active: If you have to set a profit center on balance sheet and P&L accounts, make entries manually, use FI substitution or implement the BADI AC_DOCUMENT. Note that the system calls the BADI AC_DOCUMENT only for postings using the accounting interface (for example, MM and SD postings), but it is not called for FI postings. In addition, the new transaction FAGL3KEH and the BAdI FAGL_3KEH_DEFPRCTR are available for maintaining proposal profit centers. You can use these new functions to determine a proposal profit center depending on the company code and the account. Note that this proposal profit center does not appear on the input screen; it is derived only when you post the document. The proposal profit center is used if the line item does not contain a CO account assignment and if the profit center was not already determined elsewhere.
           Profit center scenario in new G/L accounting and classic Profit Center Accounting are active: The entries of transaction 3KEH control ONLY the transfer of line items to classic Profit Center Accounting. Transaction 3KEI is no longer relevant. To set the profit center, use the options which are available in the new G/L accounting (make entries manually, use FI substitution, or implement the BADI AC_DOCUMENT).
2. Derivation of the partner profit center
Release SAP ERP 2004:
           Profit center scenario in the new G/L accounting is active, classic Profit Center Accounting is not active: Transactions 8KER/8KES are no longer available. Notes 997925 and 1087350 provide the functions from transaction OCCL. Alternatively, you can use the BAdI AC_DOCUMENT to set the partner profit center.
           Profit center scenario in new G/L accounting and classic PCA is active: Transactions 8KER/8KES and OCCL (reading purchase order/sales order for affiliated companies) are active. However, we recommend that you no longer use transaction 8KER or 8KES. Partner profit centers derived using these transactions are available in both classic Profit Center Accounting and in New General Ledger Accounting only if the line is relevant in classic Profit Center Accounting.
Release SAP ERP 2005:
           Profit center scenario in the new G/L accounting is active, classic Profit Center Accounting is not active: Transactions 8KER/8KES are no longer available. Notes 997925 and 1087350 provide the functions from transaction OCCL. Alternatively, you can use the BAdI AC_DOCUMENT or the new BAdI FAGL_DEFPPRCTR (enhancement spot FAGL_LEDGER_CUST_DEFPRCTR) with the method SET_DEFAULT_PART_PRCTR to set the partner profit center.
           Profit center scenario in new G/L accounting and classic PCA is active: Transactions 8KER/8KES and OCCL are active. However, we recommend that you no longer use transaction 8KER or 8KES because partner profit centers derived using these transactions are available in both classic Profit Center Accounting and in New General Ledger Accounting only if the line is relevant in classic Profit Center Accounting. Instead, if required, you should use the BAdI FAGL_DEFPPRCTR to set the partner profit center. A partner profit center determined in this way is always updated both in new G/L accounting and in classic Profit Center Accounting.
3. Displaying receivables and payables for each profit center
Document splitting is active
           The detailed information from the general ledger view about receivables and payables split online from the document splitting is NOT available for classic Profit Center Accounting. In this case, you CANNOT split receivables/payables nor follow-up costs subsequently (Transaction F.5D - report SAPF180A, Transaction F.50 - report SAPF181, Transaction F.05 - report SAPF100). This means that you CANNOT use transaction 1KEK to transfer receivables and payables to classic Profit Center Accounting. Follow-up costs split according to source can be transferred online to the classic Profit Center Accounting because these are already available in the data entry view.
           Read the documentation of the document splitting carefully. Analyze in which cases you have to set default account assignments because the document splitting is sometimes prevented by default account assignments.
Document splitting is not active
           In this case, you CANNOT display the receivables and payables according to source at profit center level within the new G/L accounting. However, you can use the old split of the receivables and payables within the classic Profit Center Accounting (transaction F.5D) as well as of the follow-up costs (transaction F.50), and you can use the periodic transfer of receivables and payables using transaction 1KEK. However, you can execute the new report for the foreign currency valuation of the open items (report FAGL_FC_VALUATION) with depreciation areas only, which means that the documents are no longer updated (valuation difference not updated in BSEG-BDIFF). As a result, transaction 1KEK copies only the original receivables/payables, independently of transaction 2KEM 'Account Valuation Differences'; in other words, the original data is not corrected by the valuation differences.
           You can use the standard report groups 8A98 and 8A99 to display the open receivables and payables in classic Profit Center Accounting.
4. Periodic transfers of asset portfolios to classic Profit Center Accounting
              As of Release 4. 7, it is possible to map a parallel reporting mapped in FI (for example, parallel accounts) for parallel depreciation areas in Asset Accounting by using particular settings (defining an accounting principle). You must stop the execution of transaction 1KEI because it would result in duplicated data in PCA because of postings to the same accounts. You must also stop transaction 1KEI with a 'different company code' or a 'different depreciation area in the different company code' because the data cannot be transferred correctly. Transaction 1KEI terminates with the error message KM 764. As of Release SAP ERP, if the new general ledger accounting is active, the system issues the message FAGL_LEDGER_CUST 076.
5. Dummy profit center on P&L accounts
              You use transactions 3KEH and 3KEI to firstly try to determine a proposal profit center in classic Profit Center Accounting for document line items with a P&L account (no cost element) and without a profit center account assignment. If the system does not find a proposal profit center, the dummy profit center is set for some activities (primarily from Logistics). If the new G/L accounting is active AND if at least one of the two characteristics 'Profit Center' and 'Segment' is used in the document splitting, the routine for setting the dummy profit center will no longer run (see Note 820121 and 832776). Otherwise the document splitting would not split a document, or not split it correctly. The system must then find the profit center that is valid for the process using the document splitting or another derivation. If this is not the case, the document line item will not be updated in the classic Profit Center (document line items with Profit Center initial are not allowed in the classic Profit Center Accounting).
6. PCA additional rows
              If you map Profit Center Accounting in new General Ledger Accounting in SAP ERP, you can use consulting note 937872 to update PCA additional lines recognized from classic Profit Center Accounting in new General Ledger Accounting.
              If you use the transfer price functions, you do not require Note 937872 because the structure of the PCA additional lines are technically "true" and are automatically posted in new General Ledger Accounting when maintained in transaction 0KEK.
7. Substitution of profit centers in sales orders
              Transactions 0KEL and 0KEM are available both in the classic Profit Center Accounting and in the new G/L accounting (Customizing: Financial Accounting (New) -> General Ledger Accounting (New) -> Tools -> Validation/Substitution)
8. Reporting
Line item reporting within the new G/L accounting
           Release SAP ERP 2004: Even if document splitting is set with the characteristic Profit Center, only one restricted line item reporting to profit centers is available in this release at present. When you use the G/L account line item list of FI, you can limit profit centers for line item settlement G/L accounts that are not relevant for the document splitting. As of Support Package 10, line item reporting to profit centers and segments is available.
           Release SAP ERP 2005: Line item reporting according to profit centers and segments is available.
Ledger reporting within the new G/L accounting
           Release SAP ERP 2004: Even if the document splitting is set with the characteristic profit center or segment, no current account reporting to profit centers and segments is available up to Support Package 10. With Support Package 10, current account reporting according to profit centers and segments is available. Also see the detailed explanations for Release SAP ERP 2005.
           Release SAP ERP 2005: Current account reporting according to profit centers and segments is available. It replaces the standard report groups 8A98/8A99 in earlier releases. However, the difference is that the foreign currency valuation correction is no longer displayed for each item because no update of the valuation in items occurs through the foreign currency valuation in the new general ledger (no BDIFF/BDIFF2 update). It is a key date-related valuation (mostly for the period end).
9. Transfer prices
              The transfer price functions (multiple valuations) are available for new General Ledger Accounting as of SAP ERP 2005. For SAP ERP 2004, see the release restrictions in Note 741821. In SAP ERP 2004, you can use the transfer price functions or multiple valuation functions only if you have activated the classic General Ledger and classic Profit Center Accounting.
10. Creating the profit center standard hierarchy
Release SAP ERP 2004: You must create the highest node of the standard hierarchy in the Customizing of the classic Profit Center Accounting (transaction 0KE5), even if you are not using classic Profit Center Accounting.
Release SAP ERP 2005: To create the highest node of the standard hierarchy, use transaction SM30 with the maintenance view V_FAGL_PC_STHR.
11. Creating the dummy profit center
Classic Profit Center Accounting is active (regardless of whether classic G/L accounting or new G/L accounting is active):
           If the classic Profit Center Accounting is active, you must create a dummy profit center to avoid postings with an initial profit center in the database tables of the classic PCA.
           If the new G/L accounting is also active AND if you are using at least one of the two characteristics 'Profit Center' and 'Segment' in the document splitting, you have to ensure in Release SAP ERP 2004 that Notes 820121 and 832776 are included. In Release SAP ERP 2005, the changed posting logic is included from the beginning. Note that the update of document line items in classic Profit Center Accounting is omitted because of this.
Classic Profit Center Accounting is not active, New G/L Accounting is active and you are using at least one of the two characteristics 'Profit Center' and 'Segment' in the document splitting:
           You do not have to create and use a dummy profit center. Using the dummy profit center can cause situations you want to avoid: For example, the system splits receivables/payables to the dummy profit center because of the document splitting (you cannot transfer them manually), or a document line item with dummy profit center account assignment is not split by the document splitting. To ensure that a profit center is assigned in all rows, set the profit center as mandatory field in the Customizing of the document splitting. However, note that this can also lead to terminations while posting, if a profit center assignment is missing.
12. Compare G/L Accounts in FI with Profit Center Accounting (Transaction KE5T)
              In classic Profit Center Accounting, transaction KE5T is used to compare account balances. In this transaction, the ledgers to be compare are fixed. If you use Profit Center Accounting in new General Ledger Accounting, use the general transaction GCAC. You can enter any base ledger and any comparison ledger.

Selecting between java.io and java.nio

Hi,
I'm a bit confused between java.io and java.nio. What sre the major differences between these two?
In areas are these best applicable?

The java.nio package improves on the basic Java I/O that was available prior to JDK 1.4.
It is designed to interoperate more natively with the underlying file handles (sockets, open files etc) to achieve better performance.
The improvements include true non-blocking I/O, better buffer management, character-set support, channels (similar to Occam's channels) and selectors, and some other ancillery stuff. Most of these classes are designed to be inherently threadsafe.
There are some examples here:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/nio/example/index.html
However, if you are still a beginner with file or network I/O, its better if you start with the simple I/O first. You'll appreciate the NIO improvements better afterwards.

Difference between defining segment and maintaining segment for GL items

Hello All,
Can someone tell me the difference between 'Defining a Segment' (in enterprise structure) and 'Maintaining Segment for general ledger Items' (tcode FQ0300) and when is the later used?

Hi,
Segment reporting is part of functional reporting in sap. Segment reporting is required as per International Accounting Standard 14 for listed companies thats why it is defined in Enterprise structure .
Segment is maintained in profit
center master data from where it is derived, When you post to a GL account containing segment it gets posted to profit center. This is the basis purpose of maintaining segment at Gl account level. Segment reporting is gradually being replaced by business area. This is for you information.
Regards

Link between profitability segment and profit center

Hi
Could you please let me know where we link the profit center to profitability segment. Please let me know the path and complete steps
Regards,
Krishna

Hi,
These two are independent entities; there is no link between them.
Regards,
Eli

Option to select between windows 10 and windows 7 no longer showing at boot

Hello all, I have windows 10 installed on the same drive as my windows 7 install. When I first set this up upon starting the PC I recieved the windows 10 boot manager GUI that asked me which one I wanted to boot to as well as a few other options. I have
made no changes but now when I restart it takes me directly into windows 10. How can I get this menu back as my wife still needs to be able to access the other OS. Thanks in advance for the assistance.

This is resolved. Probably obvious for most but coming from windows 7 I didn't know. For anyone who finds this on a search if you will go to windows update and on the left select recovery, then under advanced setup click on restart now. When this menu
finally loads you will have the option to change this here. Somehow mine was set from a 30 second menu to 0. I didn't change it or if I did I don't remember it. Any, Cheers!

Assignment between profitability segment and operating concern

Hi,
When i get error like, Profitability segment (with some number say 002345) does not exist in operating concern. Then what are the Tcodes i should check in controlling?
Thanks
Swetha

use se16,
enter the table name ce3****
- Operating concern.
In this table u can view all the profitability segments.
assign points if it is useful.
guru

What's the difference setting autoextend between on segment and on device?

suppose I have name segment with is on device mydevice in mydb. Then I try to set autoextend for the the database when segment is full.
The final reason for full is the device is full.
Then I could have 2 option to set this autoextend: on segment or on device:
sp_dbextend ’set’, ’database’, mydb, myseg, ’10%’
sp_dbextend ’set’, ’device’, mydev, ’10%’
So question: if set on segment, ase will extend the device automatically for that segment? about both are same or not?

802.11a gives you 802.11g speeds but using 5GHz (54mbps
802.11n gives you 144Mbps (600 peak) at 2.4GHz or 5GHz

How do I select between a PCI and a PXI device

I want to contrast the specifications and usage of PCI 6025E/PXI 6025 E.

These cards are functionally equivalent. The only difference is the form factor. The PCI-6025E is a standard PCI card designed to be used in a standard PC or workstation. The PXI-6025E is a 3U CompactPCI card designed to be used in a PXI chassis. PXI systems are functionally very similar to a standard PCs, however they do offer some high performance timing features, and are designed to be used when durability and reliability are paramount. Instead of deciding which card to get, you should first decide which platform you want to use and then choose the appropriate card.
If you want to take measurements across all 4 cylinders or take multiple measurements from one cylinder and synchronizatio
n of the samples is important (closer than 5us or so), then you may want to look into one of the simultaneous sampling DAQ cards instead of the 6025. If exact synchronization of measurements across multiple sensors is not critical, then the 6025 would work well.
Regards,
Brent R.
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

Difference between abap object and function

hi all,
i read the book on abap object of the difference between abap object and classical abap.
i know that there is only 1 instance of a specific function group but somehow i still not so clear why subsequent vehicle cannot use the same function. i also can use the do and loop to call the function? if cannot then why?
hope can get the advice.
thanks
using function *********
function-pool vehicle.
data speed type i value 0.
function accelerate.
speed = speed + 1.
endfunction.
function show_speed.
write speed.
endfunction.
report xx.
start-of-selection.
*vehicle 1
call function 'accelerate'.
call function 'accelerate'.
call function 'show_speed'.
*vehicle 2
*vehicle 3
*****abap object*******
report xx.
data: ov type ref to vehicle,
         ov_tab type table of ref to vehicle.
start-of-selection.
do 5 times.
create object ov.
append ov to ov_tab.
enddo.
loop at ov_tab into ov.
do sy-tabix times.
call method ov->accelerate.
enddo.
call method ov->show_speed.
endloop.

Hi
Now try this:
REPORT ZTEST_VEHICLEOO .
PARAMETERS: P_CAR   TYPE I,
            P_READ TYPE I.
*       CLASS vehicle DEFINITION
CLASS VEHICLE DEFINITION.
PUBLIC SECTION.
    CLASS-DATA: MAX_SPEED   TYPE I,
                MAX_VEHICLE TYPE I,
                NR_VEHICLES TYPE I.
    CLASS-METHODS CLASS_CONSTRUCTOR.
    METHODS CONSTRUCTOR.
    METHODS ACCELERATE.
    METHODS SHOW_SPEED.
    METHODS GET_SPEED EXPORTING E_SPEED TYPE I.
PRIVATE SECTION.
    DATA: SPEED      TYPE I,
          NR_VEHICLE TYPE I..
ENDCLASS.
*       CLASS vehicle IMPLEMENTATION
CLASS VEHICLE IMPLEMENTATION.
METHOD CLASS_CONSTRUCTOR.
    NR_VEHICLES = 0.
ENDMETHOD.
METHOD CONSTRUCTOR.
    NR_VEHICLES = NR_VEHICLES + 1.
    NR_VEHICLE = NR_VEHICLES.
ENDMETHOD.
METHOD ACCELERATE.
    SPEED = SPEED + 1.
    IF MAX_SPEED < SPEED.
      MAX_SPEED   = SPEED.
      MAX_VEHICLE = NR_VEHICLE.
    ENDIF.
ENDMETHOD.
METHOD SHOW_SPEED.
    WRITE: / 'Speed of vehicle nr.', NR_VEHICLE, ':', SPEED.
ENDMETHOD.
METHOD GET_SPEED.
    E_SPEED = SPEED.
ENDMETHOD.
ENDCLASS.
DATA: OV     TYPE REF TO VEHICLE,
      OV_TAB TYPE TABLE OF REF TO VEHICLE.
DATA: V_TIMES TYPE I,
      FL_ACTION.
DATA: V_SPEED TYPE I.
START-OF-SELECTION.
DO P_CAR TIMES.
    CREATE OBJECT OV.
    APPEND OV TO OV_TAB.
ENDDO.
LOOP AT OV_TAB INTO OV.
    IF FL_ACTION = SPACE.
      FL_ACTION = 'X'.
      V_TIMES = SY-TABIX * 2.
    ELSE.
      FL_ACTION = SPACE.
      V_TIMES = SY-TABIX - 2.
    ENDIF.
    DO V_TIMES TIMES.
      CALL METHOD OV->ACCELERATE.
    ENDDO.
    CALL METHOD OV->SHOW_SPEED.
ENDLOOP.
SKIP.
WRITE: / 'Higher speed', VEHICLE=>MAX_SPEED, 'for vehicle nr.',
            VEHICLE=>MAX_VEHICLE.
SKIP.
READ TABLE OV_TAB INTO OV INDEX P_READ.
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
    WRITE: 'No vehicle', P_READ.
ELSE.
    CALL METHOD OV->GET_SPEED IMPORTING E_SPEED = V_SPEED.
    WRITE: 'Speed of vehicle', P_READ, V_SPEED.
ENDIF.
Try to repeat this using a function group and I think you'll undestand because it'll be very hard to do it.
By only one function group how can u read the data of a certain vehicle?
Yes you can create in the function group an internal table where u store the data of every car: in this way u use the internal table like it was an instance, but you should consider here the example is very simple. Here we have only the speed as characteristic, but really we can have many complex characteristics.
Max

What is the difference between Total RMS and Average RMS?

There is a difference I am seeing between Average RMS in Audition 1.5 & Audition CS6. I inserted the same track into each version and selected the same segment and below are my results. Thanks!

Thanks for your response. Both versions have square wave setting, 50ms window and account for dc box checked. Any other thoughts? Kind of a mystery.

Issue with valuation segment and gl in MB5l

Hi gurus
I have an issue with a couple of materials in a report in MM MB5L list of stock values. The materials they are reporting with the issue have no costing screen extended in MM and I think this maybe the issue. The message I am getting is:
Account 121160 does not exist in company code 0010 G/L accnt is missing for val. segment 000005 1400.
I have checked the account and it does exist in the company code, is there any other config between the segment and gl account.
regards

The transaction is MB5L which is stock values balances. The message is:
Account 121160 does not exist in company code 0010
G/L accnt is missing for val. segment 000005 1400,
There is no message number, no question mark(help) to check the message number either, as it is just text at the bottom of the report showing the error.
I thought it might just be because the costing view was not setup, however not sure why the gl account is coming up as cannot see any postings to this account? It maybe that they have not done the relevant MM configuration. The gl account is a material management account.
thanks

AirDrop not working between MacBook Pro and iPad/iPhone 5

AirDrop isn't working with new operating system between iOS devices and MacBook Pro. Not sure what to do now. There are no options below on my AirDrop that can select between older Macs and iOS devices

First change airdrop setting from contacts to anyone for testing.
The default level is that contacts only. That means your iPhone contact app has to have the apple id that your iPad currently use, to show the iPad in airdrop of the iPhone.
If above is not your problem, try logout your iCloud account, in Settings-iCloud, then login again. Turn off your iOS devices and re-open it. This can fix problems potentially in iCloud account. My iPhone 5 has that potential problem in iCloud account which asks me many times a day to re-entery my apple id's password, which leads to contacts syncing, which affects airdrop's contact setting, I think.

Difficulty in selecting between HV segmentation and classical(LV) segmentat

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for