Disable colour management?

I find myself needing to output a video signal from my Mac mini  that isn't tampered with in any way whatsoever.  The MP4 video files are precisely prepared, and are to be output over HDMI using a Thunderbolt to HDMI adapter.  They must reach the destination display without any colour management altering the video data.  I can't find a way of assigning no profile to the external display.
Is there some way of achieving my goal using OS X Mountain Lion?  I already believe it's possible with Windows 7.
Merry Christmas!

No way of doing this?

Similar Messages

  • When I try disabling colour management in the printer driver, it keeps turning back on

    I'm using Lightroom v2.4 and a Canon Pixma Pro 9500 printer with the latest driver.  I've just tried to print from Lightroom for the first time since moving to this latest version of Lightroom and when I go into print setup and turn off colour management, the driver doesn't keep the setting.  Nor does it allow me to do borderless printing.  My choice of print quality is also lost - this never used to be a problem.
    This is very frustrating and means I must use Photoshop to print which takes longer when there is much to do.  Please can someone offer some advice. I can print from Photoshop without this happening.
    Thanks
    Joanne

    Have you tried creating Print templates in LR? Available from the left panel
    in Print module. That's what I do to make sure the printer driver settings
    stay the same.
    Are you quite sure you have the latest 9500 driver?
    Eric
    I'm using Windows XP SP3, and I have just one button at the bottom left of the
    Lightroom print diaglogue window called 'Page settings', when you click this,
    you can select the printer and go into properties, which is where I normally
    disable colour management.  It is also refusing to print at standard quality,
    but it defaulting to high quality (which takes a lot longer).
    Thing is that I can print from Photoshop without problems and it's from
    Photoshop where I do much of my printing, but printing from Lightroom is good
    if I have a big load of prints to do as it's so much quicker to set up and it
    has the picture package facility.

  • Disable printer colour management

    Hi   
       I have just bought the above printer to replace a very simple Canon pixma.  I use Windows Live editing and Photoshop Elements too.   To get the results required its suggested by Photoshop that the printer colour management is disabled to use Photoshops.This didnt seem to be possible with  Pixma.     But expected a better printer to have this function
    However Iaam getting the same warning box.  Printing to non interpolative (spelling?) printer. The images iaren't printing asthey were when they left photoshop.
    Can I do this with this machine or have I made a mistak in buying this machine. Its options seem limited for a  machine worth around 60.00

    Hello @Jenny105,
    Welcome to the HP Support Forums!
    I would like to assist you today with resolving the Photoshop Elements error that you're receiving when printing from your Windows 7 computer to your HP Envy 4500 All-in-One. I did some research into this error and found that the message "Printing to non interpolated printer" is a postscript error. This indicates that rather than just a colour issue, you have a settings issue under Photoshop.  Apparently this message is just informing you that you have Postscript settings and you are using a non Postscript printer. Postscript is a printer language. Consumer printers, like your HP Envy, are only PCL 3 for their printing language capabilities. If you need to use Postscript settings (such as halftone patterns, transfer curves, interpolation . . .) than you will need a Postscript capable printer, like a Laserjet, or commerical Inkjet. Also, because you're finding that the colours aren't printing correctly, you may need to adjust the colour profile information under Photoshop.
    For instructions on how to adjust the colour profile settings, please click here. You can choose to either 'let Photoshop determine printed colours' or 'Let printer determine printed colours'.
    Once you have adjusted the colour profile settings, please test printing again.
    Please let me know if the colour profile adjustment resolves your issues. Best of luck!
    X-23
    I work on behalf of HP
    Please click "Accept as Solution" if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click the "Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the right to say "Thanks" for helping!

  • Disabling printer colour management

    Hi,
    my prints are coming out very dark on my Epson 4400 from photshop CS6 on my Mac OS X10.8.5
    In the print window it says to disable the printer colour management from the print settings dialogue box but I can't find this anywhere. I have seleceted Photoshop to manage the colours.
    Any advice much needed!

    It should be in your main Print window...Print > Color Handling.  I have mine set for "Let Printer Manage Colors" because the Epson driver has a lot of options I want to take advantage of and is engineered to interpret application color settings accurately.

  • ACPU disables printer driver colour management; how?

    Having developed a printing app for Mac Large Format Printers which uses its own CMM, I am finding it increasingly difficult to print natively, so without color management applied to it outside my App.
    Before, drivers had an option to set the simulation to None, which would make the printer use the entire gamut available.
    Now (I believe from OS 10.9.6 and up), this option has been taken out of the HP Designjet PCL drivers, and no longer works properly for RGB in HP designjet PS drivers.
    Adobe Color Printer Utility (ACPU) allows for targets to be printed correctly. It works great. But as my App has its own CMM, it needs to be able to print natively using the drivers.
    My question is; is there an API or documentation on how to make your mac App tell the driver not to do colour management, just like ACPU does?
    Or can you make Cups to this by setting a Cups option?
    Currently, only Adobe Apps like PhotoShop can do this.
    I understand that Adobe will suggest that using Adobe software is a good idea (which it is) but the App I made goes way beyond normal printing functionality offered in these applications and offers hot folders, automatic custom page size definition droplet actions, canvas border creation, nesting, printer load sharing etc. etc.
    Any help/information would be very very very much appreciated.
    Boudewijn Krijger
    ColorPlaza

    The behavior in screen capture two with the two radio buttons grayed out is correct. You cannot turn off color management anyway. The magenta cast is another problem.

  • Colour management

    I have now CS5 on a ProMac and noticed the prints are not the same as in Photoshop CS2 outputting from Epson 3880 printer. Can some advise how to print from the file and not from the printer. Yes I have profiles for paper and ink. 

    Are you saying that selection of any profile other than "printer"  automatically disables printer colour management?
    Yes.  I can't see your screenshots for some reason.  But, you should see both Colorsync and Canon Color Matching greyed out, regardless of which one seems to be "on".  Canon Colormatch should be on if you're using any of the Canon utilities such as DPP or Easy Photo Print.  That's probably what the Canon rep was telling you. Go ahead and give it a try.  I'm not sure exactly what you're printing to, but I assume if you want to turn off Printer color management, you know which profile you want to use, say, for printing to non-Canon paper or using a calibrated custom profile.  Just select the profile in Aperture, and Color Management should be turned off at the printer as long as you see the options greyed out.  Aperture is just reminding you to make sure it's turned off (actually when I try it with my IP5200 and Pro3800, I don't get the reminder- perhaps it's a bug).
    The options are available in Preview because Preview can't color manage.
    Hope this helps.

  • Disabling color management in canon driver

    Hello
    Can anyone tell me how to disable Color Management in the Printer Driver Dialogue Box for Canon (ip4000) printer?
    Other AI CS4 users must have needed to do this, in accordance with the instructions in the Color management print window when printing in AICS4, as otherwise the colors just dont work when printing.
    As most AI users will know the guidance says "Let Illustrator determine colors", and "dont forget to disable color management in printer driver dialogue box". How do you do that then?
    I have no idea how to find the Canon printer driver dialogue box, and Canon did not seem to know what I was talking about when I phoned them - they said contact Apple or Adobe.
    Grateful for any any advice.

    I don't think it is stupid at all. Even home or small office printers nowadays have the capacity to turn their own colour management on and off. That does not necessarily result in implementing custom profiles though. It is just saying "don't try and match the colours by yourself" basically (although probably a bit more sophisticated in the driver's kitchen).
    As for doing it on a Canon printer (make sure you follow the next steps with Illustrator closed so it can apply to all pictures you will print) :
    - Open the Printing Preferences control panel of your printer,
    - In the Color/Intensity section, select "Manual" and click on "Set...",
    - Check that all colour adjustment sliders are at 0,
    - Go to the "Matching" tab,
    - In the "Color correction" drop box menu, select "None",
    - Close all dialog boxes and you're done.
    It has made a huge difference on my prints with a Canon ip3600 printer. They were way too reddish before, now they are as close as they can be to what I want - provided I don't have nor need any calibration hardware to make highly precise colour calibration end to end.

  • Draft Mode Printing with Colour Management

    Hi
    A simple change to the print module that would improve matters for me.
    Draft Mode Printing disables all print enhancements, I can understand the reasoning behind this BUT for me the main advantage is the speed of generation using only the existing previews, I would still like to be able to print using the correct colours. Proofs don't have to be high quality or particularly sharp but if you present a client with proofs that have a colour cast or other colour fault they are going to think your final images are also suspect.
    Please consider re-enabling Colour Management in Draft Mode.
    Thanks
    Mike

    u are probably not getting much help on this unless you post screenshot of your process (starting with File> Print window)
    remember, Photoshop can print a document correct regardless of how it looks on the monitor (and vice versa: Photoshop can display a document correct regardless of how it prints)
    i recommend getting a known target like the WhackedRGB.jpg and see where the problem is occuring (in Photoshop color management settings, on the monitor, on the printer or both)...

  • Switch off printer colour management

    Hello,
    I am on a Mac Snow Leopard 10.6.8 and using IDCS5 to print to a Canon Pro 9500 printer.
    When I get to the print dialog, I can only select colour handling by indesign. There is no option for colour managed by printer which is fine because I would prefer to have indesign manage the colours.
    However when I go to printer settings dialog I cannot turn off the printer colour management. There are two radio buttons only in the colour matching section. One is canon colour matching and the other is Coloursync from which I can select from various colour profiles.
    I can't figure out how to disable colour mangement from the printer driver.
    Can someone help me with this please?
    Jach

    I can see what you are saying about objects with different profiles in one indesign document. But the output has to be just one profile - in my case my custom built profile for the type of paper and my inkjet printer.
    So if my understanding is right - Indesign takes the number colours from the various objects in the document and convert them to numbers that my printer will use for a particular type of paper. To do this conversion indesign needs a recipe, and that recipe is in the form of my custum built profile.
    However, what is happening so far, is that indesign is converting the colours using my profile but then the printer driver is also doing some form of conversion which is messing up the colours.
    What I did try is select the right profile in the indesign print dialogue and then went to printer settings and chose colour sync and the same profile from the drop down list. I was hoping that selecting the same profile in both indesign and printer driver would result in preventing double profiling. However the results were bad.
    I am not sure how choosing DocumentRGB is going to help. Because my colour setting across the adobe suite is ProPhoto RGB for the RGB settings.
    If I go to the drop down menu for printer profile, one of the options I get is "DocumentRGB - ProPhotoRGB". Wouldn't this be wrong if some of the images in my document are sRGB or some other colour space?

  • How do I turn off the printer colour management in printer drivers on my photosmart C7280

    photosmart C7280
    How do I turn off the printer colour management in printer drivers 

    HI whcotton,
    You can click here to go to a post for help with disabling the printer color management for your printer. This person was having the same issue as you and the accepted solution worked for them. Hope you find this helpful.
    If I helped you at all it would be great if you clicked the blue kudos star!
    If I solved your post please mark it as solved to help others.
    I'm a printer tech with HP.

  • My problem is that after printing the first photo or picture, when I come to print a second, both the Colour Management and Epson Colour Controls are greyed out and showing No Colour Management

    I have recently purchased a Mac computer (updated to Maverick) to go with my Epson Stylus Photo RX500 printer which has given excellent service with my old Windows computer. However, when trying to print pictures or photos via Photoshop Elements 11, the best results I can get are using the Colour Management and Epson Colour controls in the printing options box.
    My problem is that after printing the first photo or picture, when I come to print a second, both the Colour Management and Epson Colour Controls are greyed out and showing No Colour Management, The only way I can reset the controls is to shut down the printer and computer and restart.
    Could there may be a setting somewhere that I need to adjust please?  I have been in touch with Epson and they say that the Epson Colour controls are part of the Photoshop Elements software but a post on the Adobe forum brought no results and I am unable to contact Adobe.
    <Edited by Host>

    Hello Garry. Thanks for the reply. I guess I should have used a different title from "How do I post a question?" That should come after trying to resolved the colour settings first. However, to answer your question, after experimenting with all the different settings in Photoshop Elements and Epson software, I now start with PSE11 Colour settings then click "no colour management" then after clicking Print, I choose "More Options/Colour Management/Colour Handling/Printer Manages Colour" then I choose "Page Setup/Layout/Colour Matching" which then shows Epson Colour Controls but I also choose "Layout/Colour Management" which then shows "Colour Controls/Mode" I then of course choose an Epson printer profile depending on the paper I am using. I get good results but as I said, the Colour Matching and Colour Controls are then greyed out. Hope that makes sense.

  • Colour Management - who does what - Some thoughts now the smoke is clearing

    First up, thanks very much to everyone who contributed their ideas and expertise to my recent query here, when I was seeking help for a problem with colour management issues when printing a magazine I edit. I have a ton of suggestions  to work through and study but the smoke is slowly clearing and it raises some interesting points which I think are worth recounting.
    First of all, I have been editing short run magazines now for 25 years, at first part time and later on a professional contract basis.  I am not a trained graphic designer nor a trained printer. I did start out training as a graphic designer, many years ago but gave it up for a career in IT (as a networking specialist). That was full time until 10 years ago, although I did some freelance writing and editing in my spare time.
    And yes, I did start originally with scissors and cut and paste, and moved on through black and white with spot colour and Pagemaker software  to full colour and InDesign today. One thing which may be different about my experience to most of yours is that I am a PC user and always have been. All my editing and graphics work has always been done on a PC - Pagemaker was our DTP package of choice for a long time and we supplemented this with Corel-Draw (which has a range of graphics handling options). All my software is legal and I always register it and keep it up to date. I have used the same graphic designer for quite a few years now and whenever we upgrade our software he goes and gets trained on the latest release.
    Around 10 years ago I was offered the chance to edit a specialist short run magazine (not the current one). This was a chance I took and gave up the day job and became a full time freelance. Editing is not my main or only source of income. I am also  a freelance writer and photographer and heritage consultant and I have a specialist image library.   I sell my own sell my work - articles and pictures - to the national and local press. I also write books (non fiction) on commission. The magazine editing is really an extension of my interest in historic landscapes. I have never had any complaints, or problems, with the freelance work, photos and archived images I sell.  Clients include national newspapers here in the UK, national magazine groups and my books are available in national bookstore chains. I supply my work digitally, naturally, and it includes photos I have taken myself and items which I have scanned into my library of historical images and store on line. No reported colour management issues there.
    I have always enjoyed a good relationship with my publishers and printers because I seek to be as professional as possible, which means delivering my stuff on time, to the required standard so that minimum intervention is required from them. This does assume that I have a clear brief from them on what they need from me.
    Recently this approach has not been enough to avoid colour management issues with the short run magazine I currently edit. I have been wondering when  and where things went astray and date it back to the upgrade to InDesign two years ago. However it may have its roots in my earlier decision to use PCs not Macs for my work.
    Until 4 years ago I had used the same printers for magazine editing for many years. They were a well respected firm specialising in short run magazines. They were not far from where I live and work and if there was a problem I would go over and discuss it with them. They were happy, and competent, to handle Pagemaker files generated on a PC and convert my rgb images to cmyk if there was any concern about the colour balance. On a few occasions I paid them to scan a photo for me. However 4 years ago the owner decided to retire and shut up shop. I needed to find a new printers and it had to be someone who specialised in short run magazines and could meet the budget of the charity I edit for. Also someone who could handle copy generated using Pagemaker running on a PC. I chose a printers I had used briefly in the past  where I knew some of the staff and was promised PC based Pagemaker would not be a problem. I even got this in writing. I started to send them proofs generated using Pagemaker v7 on my PC.
    I soon found that although they had agreed they could handle Pagemaker on a PC in fact they had only a few PC based clients and were using a single ageing PC running Pagemaker to proof their work. In fact nearly all their jobs were Quark based. I was also told we had to supply CMYK images although not given any further requirement so I now did the conversions from rgb to CMYK using my PhotoPaint software. (There are quite a few settings in Corel for the conversion but there was no guidance  by the printer on which to use so to be honest it did not occur to me that it might be a problem).
    Now of course I understand that the drive to get customers to supply CMYK images was a Quark driven requirement back in the late 1990s. I did not and do not use Quark so knew nothing for this.  I did have some early colour problems and font incompatibilities with the new printers and was pressured by their senior Graphic Designer (who designed for their own contract clients) to upgrade to InDesign and provide them with a .pdf, which I was assured would solve all my problems. The .pdf would be the same as the final printed magazine because "it would not require any further intervention by the printers".
    I expect you are collectively throwing up your hands in horror at this point, but I think he was speaking genuinely. The creation of a .pdf  using InDesign, is widely promoted as the ultimate answer to all printing issues.   I have encountered it recently with a lot of printers' salesmen and my friend, who edits a learned journal, has just been told the same thing by her printers, to get her to upgrade to ID. Incidentally she also uses a PC.
    So we upgraded our design process in house to InDesign and our graphic designer went on a course, two courses in fact. When we came to produce our first .pdf using ID, the printers'  Senior Graphic designer came on the phone and talked our designer through the ID Export function. I think he may at that time have told him to create a preset profile with MPC and the defaults, but to be honest I don't recall. We were never sent anything in writing about what settings we needed to match theirs. I continued to have intermittant colour management problems but put this down to my photos. Things came to head with the most recent issue where the colours were badly out on the cover, supplied by a press agency and taken by a professional photographer. The printers seemed to have little or no idea about possible causes.
    Initially I thought that part of the underlying cause must lie in some mismatch between what I was sending the printers and what they expected to receive so I asked them to specify what I should send. All they said was use Profile preset as MPC setting and accept  the defaults which accompany it.
    So I came on here looking for a solution. A lot of people were keen to offer their own experience which I really appreciate. However the messages could be conflicting. Some of you suggested it was the underlying cover photo which was at fault, some that it was my monitor which needed better calibration.
    Many of you here said that part of the problem, if not the whole problem, was the way I was generating my CMYKs for the printer and I should use Photoshop to do this. You also mentioned a number of possible colour management settings which I should try.
    At times the advice seemed to change tack. There were suggestions that the colour management issues I had  were nothing to do with the printers, that it was up to me not them. Quite a lot of you said I needed to be better informed about Colour Management issues. I agree, but I had never had any previously (maybe good luck, maybe good support from my previous printer) so I was not even aware that I needed to be better informed.  Some of you mildly chastised me for not finding out more and doing more to manage my own colour management with the switch to ID. To which I can only say if I had needed to train up, I would have done. I did not realise I needed to.  Nor was my designer aware of the issues as colour management was not really covered on his ID courses which were about typesetting and design.
    Some of you even seemed to hint that unless I was prepared to use an expensive high end printer or effectively retrain as a print specialist or get my graphic designer to do so, then I probably shouldn't be in the magazine editing game at all. OK maybe that is a bit harsh but you get the drift.
    The fact is that printing is much more accessible these days to all sorts of people and in particular to people with PCs. My brother lives in a large village in an isolated area and produces a village magazine which has been a great success. It is in black and white with spot colour but he would like to move to an all colour issue. He is a bit nervous of the colour management issues as he has no experience of graphic design and is his own designer using a low end entry level design package. He too uses a PC. The printers reps all tell him the same thing they tell me, that all he needs to supply is a .pdf using InDesign.
    Somewhere I feel a black hole has developed, maybe back in the 1990s with Quark 4.11. A lot of printers standardised on that, and set up a work flow and prepress dependent on CMYK images as provided by the clients. They assumed the the clients would doing their own colour management. This approach also assumes everyone is using Quark on a Mac with the full range of Adobe software. When it became possible to generate .pdfs using InDesign, this was held out to users as the Holy Grail of magazine printing, even though their workflows and prepress were still based on Quark 4.11 principles. Any underlying colour management issues the clients now have to tackle themselves.
    So now we have the situation in which I find myself, having to learn from scratch a good deal about colour management issues so that I can tell the printers what is needed for my magazine. Meanwhile all the printing salesmen, the ones I encounter anyway, are still busy pushing the InDesign to .pdf as the "be all and end all" solution. Some re-education is needed for all parties I think.

    I am glad to see that the sun is peeping through the clouds.
    I apologise for my Aussie-style straight talk earlier, but as I said before it was not directed personally at you but in the direction of others whom you epitomize, repeating a conversation I have had many times over the last 10 years or so where respectable, well-meaning photographers, designers and other contributors refuse to accept that colour management is being thrust upon them.
    It is a simple fact of life, there is this 'new' thing that has butted into the very root of our trades and changed the most basic principles of printing and photography.  We expect that this kind of thing does not happen but the industry we now work in is not the same one we trained in twenty years ago.
    Many printers are still struggling with the same conflict, so many tradespeople cannot accept this change.
    This is exacerbated by the fact that colour management is so complicated to learn and implement and confounded by the fact that the default settings and a clumsy workflow often yield acceptable results with incorrect, generic settings, hence the old 'use InDesign and make a PDF and it will be ok' route.
    When the chain of colour management includes the photographer, the photographer's client, the designer, the other designer maybe, the prepress person, and the platemaker, and a single incorrect click by any one of those can kill the CM it is not surprising that in the end when someone is looking back to see where it fell over they usually never find out.....   They will meet someone who says ' I never touched it, I simply opened the file and scaled it and closed it'.  And that person will be a reputable photographer or designer (and CLIENT) who has no idea they just broke it.  So what do we do?  We go with the generic setting that seems to yield adequate results therefore avoiding the confrontation. 
    You need to understand the situation of the printer who took his business through the 'early' days of colour management, we had all kinds of very reputable sources supplying incorrect files, we did not have the expertise yet to be able to address the entire workflow, it would have meant training photographers and designers all through the best design houses and national institutions, because they blamed the printer.  Only in the last few years have I seen these people coming around to the fact that they bear responsibility for implementing their own cm and maintaining it through their own work.
    Sadly, many high end sources are still not there, and I mean HIGH end!  Probably the ones that don't even visit this forum because they want to keep blaming the printer... They tend to live with the poor quality reproductions and just pull up the worst ones and fiddle with those and try to avoid the 'elephant in the room'.
    I am sorry to say that it was not practical for a printer to reject mismanaged files for fear of losing clients who would happily accept less than perfect results in order to avoid the painful truth that was being told to them.  The best thing we could do was to gently make those clients aware that their workflow was imperfect and hope to show them how we could help...  Many print shops do not have someone knowledgeable enough or patient enough to do this, or the boss does not understand the issue either and tries to work around it to keep his jobs flowing in the expectation that all those experts in the chain will eventually tame the thing.
    The many experts on this holy forum are waaaaayyyy ahead of the printing industry in general and photographers and designers in general in their understanding of colour management workflow.  I have seen first hand how reputable local industry people and trainers alike are spreading misinformation and bad techniques, when I discovered these forums back in about 2002 I found that they opened up a whole new galaxy of knowledge and facts that actually worked and made sense, unlike what I had been told locally....  This forum taught me what the Adobe text books did not, the Tech' teachers did not, local 'experts' did not! 
    I tell all interested people to join these forums and learn to discriminate between the good and bad information.

  • How do I fix colour picker to work across different colour-managed monitors?

    Hey everyone!
    I'm assuming this problem I'm having stems from having colour-calibrated monitors, but let me know if I'm wrong!
    To preface, this is the setup I have:
    Windows 7
    3 monitors as follows, all have individual colour profiles calibrated using the Spyder 3
    Cintiq 12WX
    Dell U2410
    Dell 2409WFP
    Photoshop CS6 - Proofed with Monitor RGB, and tested with colour-managed and non-colour-managed documents
    I usually do most of my work on the Cintiq 12WX, but pull the photoshop window to my main monitor to do large previews and some corrections. I noticed that the colour picker wouldn't pick colours consistently depending on the monitor the Photoshop window is on.
    Here are some video examples:
    This is how the colour picker works on my Dell U2410: http://screencast.com/t/lVevxk5Ihk
    This is how it works on my Cintiq 12WX: http://screencast.com/t/tdREx4Xyhw9
    Main Question
    I know the Cintiq's video capture makes the picture look more saturated than the Dell's, but it actually looks fine physically, which is okay. But notice how the Cintiq's colour picker doesn't pick a matching colour. It was actually happening the opposite way for a while (Dell was off, Cintiq was fine), but it magically swapped while I was trying to figure out what was going on. Anyone know what's going on, and how I might fix it?
    Thanks for *any* help!
    Semi-related Question regarding Colour Management
    Colour management has always been the elephant-in-the-room for me when I first tried to calibrate my monitors with a Spyder colourimeter years ago. My monitors looked great, but Photoshop's colours became unpredictable and I decided to abandon the idea of calibrating my monitors for years until recently. I decided to give it another chance and follow some tutorials and articles in an attempt to keep my colours consistent across Photoshop and web browsers, at least. I've been proofing against monitor colour  and exporting for web without an attached profile to keep pictures looking good on web browsers. However, pictures exported as such will look horrible when uploaded to Facebook. Uploading pictures with an attached colour profile makes it look good on Facebook. This has forced me to export 2 versions of a picture, one with an attached colour profile and one without, each time I want to share it across different platform. Is there no way to fix this issue?
    Pictures viewed in Windows Photo Viewer are also off-colour, but I think that's because it's not colour managed... but that's a lesser concern.

    I think I've figured out the colour management stuff in the secondary question, but the weird eyedropper issue is still happening. Could just be a quirk from working on things across multiple monitors, but I'm hoping someone might know if this is a bug/artifact.
    Going to lay out what I inferred from my experiments regarding colour management in case other noobs like me run into the same frustrations as I did. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong - the following are all based on observation.
    General Explanation
    A major source of my problems stem from my erroneous assumption that all browsers will use sRGB when rendering images. Apparently, most popular browsers today are colour-managed, and will use an image's embedded colour profile if it exists, and the monitor's colour profile if it doesn't. This was all well and good before I calibrated my monitors, because the profile attached to them by default were either sRGB or a monitor default that's close to it. While you can never guarantee consistency on other people's monitors, you can catch most cases by embedding a colour profile - even if it is sRGB. This forces colour-managed browsers to use sRGB to render your image, while non-colour-managed browsers will simply default to sRGB. sRGB seems to be the profile used by Windows Photo Viewer too, so images saved in other wider gamut colour spaces will look relatively drab when viewed in WPV versus a colour-managed browser.
    Another key to figuring all this out was understanding how Profile Assignment and Conversion work, and the somewhat-related soft-proofing feature. Under Edit, you are given the option to either assign a colour profile to the image, or convert the image to another colour profile. Converting an image to a colour profile will replace the colour profile and perform colour compensations so that the image will look as physically close to the original as possible. Assigning a profile only replaces the colour profile but performs no compensations. The latter is simulated when soft-proofing (View > Proof Colors or ctrl/cmd-Y). I had followed bad advice and made the mistake of setting up my proofing to Monitor Color because this made images edited in Photoshop look identical when the same image is viewed in the browser, which was rendering my images with the Monitor's colour profile, which in turn stemmed from yet another bad advice I got against embedding profiles .  This should formally answer Lundberg's bewilderment over my mention of soft-proofing against Monitor Colour.
    Conclusion and Typical Workflow (aka TL;DR)
    To begin, these are the settings I use:
    Color Settings: I leave it default at North American General Purpose 2, but probably switch from sRGB to AdobeRGB or  ProPhoto RGB so I can play in a wider gamut.
    Proof Setup: I don't really care about this anymore because I do not soft-proof (ctrl/cmd-Y) in this new workflow.
    Let's assume that I have a bunch of photographs I want to post online. RAWs usually come down in the AdobeRGB colour space - a nice, wide gamut that I'll keep while editing. Once I've made my edits, I save the source PSD to prep for export for web.
    To export to web, I first Convert to the sRGB profile by going to Edit > Convert to Profile. I select sRGB as the destination space, and change the Intent to either Perceptual or Relative Colorimetric, depending on what looks best to me. This will convert the image to the sRGB colour space while trying to keep the colours as close to the original as possible, although some shift may occur to compensate for the narrower gamut. Next, go to Save for Web. The settings you'll use:
    Embed Color Profile CHECKED
    Convert to sRGB UNCHECKED (really doesn't matter since you're already in the sRGB colour space)
    and Preview set to Internet Standard RGB (this is of no consequence - but it will give a preview of what the image will look like in the sRGB space)
    That's it! While there might be a slight shift in colour when you converted from AdobeRGB to sRGB, everything from then on should stay consistent from Photoshop to the browser
    Edit: Of course, if you'd like people to view your photos in glorious wide gamut in their colour-managed browsers, you can skip the conversion to sRGB and keep them in AdobeRGB. When Saving for Web, simply remember to Embed the Color Profile, DO NOT convert to sRGB, and set Preview to "Use Document Profile" to see what the image would look like when drawn with the embedded color profile

  • How do i turn off colour management in photoshop cc

    i cannot make any sense of the 'help' on being able to see any display which allows me to turn off colour management in photoshop cc or in lightroom 5 when using my Mac 10.9.3

    Good day!
    What exactly do you mean?
    Regards,
    Pfaffenbichler

  • A Colour Management tutorial from an amateur

    Archiving at the end of a long project I came across a document I assembled at the start when I wanted to teach myself about colour management. I spent several weeks reading, experimenting and putting together these notes, but it all came to nought. To quote from the notes:
    …I chose not to use colour management when printing my books on a Xerox iGen3. I converted the InDesign files to PDF with all colour management turned off, and asked the printer to print ‘direct’. The iGen RIP converted RGB images to CMYK, and CMYK images were printed as per the colour numbers. Using certain colour settings for my monitor, and for Photoshop and InDesign, I was able to obtain a very close match between what was on screen and what was on paper without the need for profiles…
    I've asked a fair few questions here over the years, and this forum has been a great help, but I rarely offer anything in return. Well, here's a little something that some people might find useful. A mob of information about colour management, collated from various sources with my tuppence worth here and there to make it flow. It was put together before my InDesign days when I used Pages, so forgive the mediocre layout.
    Colour Management (450k) can be downloaded here: http://www.mediafire.com/?86edp6742ac6zlv (If Peter Spier is reading this: Peter, that's a hot link now; I've upgraded my Mediafire account so there are no more banners).
    If anyone visits here in the future and that link doesn't work (which will happen if I upload a new version), try this one, a link to the folder: http://www.mediafire.com/?an9n0o36nymwv
    Please let me know if there are any gross errors in the PDF and I'll fire up Pages and correct them.

    geoffseeley, Welcome to the discussion area!
    1) amber light keeps flashing but internet works - is this a problem?
    I believe that indicates that you do not have wireless encryption enabled. If you enabled wireless encryption, the light should turn green.
    3) how does iTunes work through the extreme box? am i supposed to plug my home cinema into the extreme box somehow?
    The AirPort Extreme base station (AEBS) has no special features to support video/audio directly. iTunes has nothing to do with the AEBS.
    The AirPort Express (AX) has an audio out port for streaming music from iTunes.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do I go frame to frame after a few seconds?

    Hello, I'm new here so forgive any mistakes or lack of knowledge. (Brief history: I have programmed in Pascal before, currently learning Java and Flash) So my question is i want to be able to move from frame to frame after X amount of seconds. I have

  • Error while using OWSM File based authentication - URGENT

    Hi , We have the requirement to invoke the gateway protected webservice from the client. PLEASE GIVE ME A SOLUTION. IT IS URGENT. I have protected a webservice via OWSM Gateway.The webservice was devloped with the jdev RPC-ENC format and deployed on

  • Adobe Updater not working for CS4

    I have installed CS4 Master Collection on a new Windows 7 PC and it is working, but Adobe Updater isn't working properly. It first installed a few updates that were correct, but now it can't find the remaining updates (which I know exist). The messag

  • Can I play my iMovie project on my hdtv via an HDMI cable and adapter?

    Greetings. Wondering if I can play my iMovie project directly from my MacBook Pro to my hdtv via an hdmi cable with adapter for the MacBook? Thank you!

  • IMAP Message Alert that e-mail is larger than 20MB

    I have followed all posted instructions about how to purge messages from Outlook 2013 using the Advanced Search. The IMAP alert that there is an e-mail that is over 20MB continues to repeat itself. There are no messages anyplace among my providers th