Disable or Validate Order or Cost center in MIGO for Mvmt type 201/261

Hi All,
I want to disable or validate 'Order' field in MIGO for the goods issue if the movement type is 201.
I want to disable or validate 'Cost Center' field in MIGO for the goods issue if the movement type is 261.
User do not want 'Order' field in MIGO for movement type 201 & User do not want 'Cost centre' field in MIGO for movement type 261.
Thanks
Pabi

Hi
go to OMJJ
here select move type and then give move type 201
now select 201 and click on Field selection (ENJOY)
now just remove the order field from here
similarly do for 261 movememt
this will affect to whole client

Similar Messages

Fld selectn for mvmt type 201 / acct 96220 differs for CO/PP order (011)

Hi all,
Purpose : Our client want to use Statistical Internal Order in Movement Type - 201 with entries to be get posted to selective G/L Accounts relating to Vehicle Expenses
For that purpose we have made the Order field as "Optional Field" for transfer posting.
When we make an entry in Order field, system is allowing to post the entries in predefined G/L Accounts but our client want to post the entries to the specific G/L created for that purpose.
After selecting that G/L in Tcode - MB1A we are getting the above error (Message no. M7093)..
In FS00 - G/L Master, we have made the CO/PP Order field as Mandatory field
When we make the Order field as "Mandatory" for transfer posting, system is allowing us to input the specific G/L but we do not want to keep the Order field as Mandatory for transfer posting since that will affect all other transfer postings.
Please give us any solution
Regards,
Raj

Hi
Goto Transaction SE38 & enter the Program RM07CUFA
Execute the program & enter the Movemnt type & G/L account change the Field sataus for the Mobvemnt type for the Field CO/PP Order as optional similarly change the G/L account to optional to suit your requirements.
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Fld selectn for mvmt type 261 / acct 404000 differs for Cost center (010)

Hi Guru's,
When trying to Post a stock from one valuation type to other valuation type in MB11 with reference to refurbishment order i am getting
"Fld selectn for mvmt type 261 / acct 404000 differs for Cost center (010)".
May I know the actual problem and please help on rectifying this.
-balaji

Hi,
Please Run the below Program through transaction code SE38
RM07CUFA
Provide Movement type 261
Company Code
GL code 404000
Find out the error message, there can be conflicts between movement type Filed status and GL field status group.
Please change the GL field status group.
Ravi polampalli

Is there is a way to have a link from purchase order to cost center report.

Is there is a way to have a link from purchase order to cost center report.
I am meaning kind of:
Standard way to customized this link?
or
User exit to have this link in place
or
Any other solution
Thanks

For me it does not make any sense from going from PO to cost center report.
However, if you want to see the purchase order cost incurred with a cost center, execute KSB1 report. Within the layout, bring "Purchasing Document" field, where you can see the purchase order number in cost center line item report.

Work order to cost center settlement does not post to GL module (FI)

Dear Expert,
I find the Maintenance Work order to cost center settlement does not post to GL module (FI)?Also, the settlement cost element is primary element define in GL chart of account.
When an maintenance order is settled with KO88 or KO8G the work order value posted cost center and the value is display in cost center report but not post to GL module in FI.As I notice only good issue or receive to/from work order is posted in GL but not the settlement of work order.Why?
Between, Kindly advise what are the report or T-code to view the maintenance order is done the settlement and what are the value is settle for maintenance work order?
Kindly advice under what circumstance when maintenance work order to cost center settlement is posted to GL(FI module)?
Please advice.
Thank you.
KH

Hi Kiran,
The error message clearly says that "Cost Center validity starts from 01.10.2014" i.e. in the future period.
Change the cost center from period in the past date and try.
BR, Srinivas Salpala

Work Order to cost center settlement with line item detail

Iu2019m having difficulty finding a method to settle from a work order to a cost center with line item detail. When an order is settled with KO88 or KO8G the total value for that work order/cost element combination is combined and posted to the cost center as a lump sum with the description of CTR\######. Users would like to see the individual values that posted to the work order in a cost center report such as KSB1.
I donu2019t see anything in the settlement rule, settlement profile or allocation structure that will allow line item settlement from work order to cost center. Is line item settlement possible when settling to a cost center? Is there an alternate way to see these expenses as line items in KSB1?
Thanks,
Jeff

Thanks Christian,
We've defined an allocation structure that we use for Project System and Work Order settlement and have Receiver Categories established as FXA, CTR and WBS with "by Cost Element" checked. Work order costs do settle to the cost center entered in the settlement rule, the problem is it combines all items values as a single amount when posting to the cost center.
For example:
expenses post to the work order under cost element 500000 for $500, $200, $300 and cost element 600000 for $250 and $250. The settlement rule says to settle to cost center 170000. When the settlement takes place cost center 170000 is debited $1000 to cost element 500000 and $500 to cost element 600000. We would prefer to see individual posting of $500, $200, $300 to 500000 and $250, $250 to 600000.
Thanks,
Jeff

How to change purchase order's cost center in batch

Dear all :
how to change purchase order's cost center in batch?

Dear Manish :
thanks so much for you reply.
the filed which i wanted to change it's content is cost center (KOSTL) in table EKKN.
i couldn't find it in this t-code when i select fields.

Create Purchase Order to cost center

Hi,
Will it be possible to create a purchase requisition from the MRP run which has account assignment K and default a cost center.
At the moment I need manually to update the requisition item line with 'k' and costcenter before converting to a purchase order.
br,
Anders

The purpose of MRP run is to make sure that you always have enough stock.
An order to cost center will not increase stock.
Means: MRP is not able to create requisitions for cost center consumption. If you change a requisition created by MRP to be ordered to a cost center, then the next MRP run will create a new requisition to stock.

Internal order and Cost center

hi guys
can anyone please explain me why do we have cost centers and internal orders?
If we can track cost to cost center then why do we need internal orders?
please give some detailed explanation.
thanks

when you are posting a document and if the g/l is created as a cost element then
you have to either assign a cost center, profit center, internal order etc
so when you are posting an expense and if its for that project you assign the
internal order and when the project is finished you can settle it to a cost center.
If we can assign both internal order and cost center i dont think so but not very
sure. Best way to learn these things i would recommend is try it in test system
that way you will understand better about the whole flow and it will stick in your
mind.
Regards,
Zaid

*Internal Order* or *Cost Center* on SD Sales Order

Hi Gurus,
please can you tell me how we can set automatically Internal Order or Cost Center on SD Sales Order (without putting it manually).
Thank you very much
Kind Regards
Andrea

Hi Andrea,
As Ambrusa told, one Z table should be created where you can maintain order reasons, sales org, sales order type and the internal order no. as combination and use the below mentioned user exit.
When user create sales order, system will default the order reasons maintained in the z table and internal order no. will be picked as user select the order reason.
Hope this will meet your requirement.
Regards
Suresh.

SD order with cost center on header still creates CO-PA document in VF02

Hi guys,
we have 2 cases in SD, where we want not postings in CO-PA (for samples to customers):
1. on SD order item level with internal order account assignment
2. on SD header level with a proper order reason which allows cost center assignment on headers (OVF3)
1. is working
2. is not working
here the details:
1. order with e.g. 2 items created, one has a special item category with internl order account assignment. Goods delivery is posting with MM account determination VAY (so with cost element) and goods issue is correct on internal order.
This item is not creating a CO-PA document, which is correct and wanted.
2. special order type in SD for samples, where a order reason allows cost center assignment on header level (cost centers on SD item level is not possible obviously). Both cases use the same billing type, and same item category. In cost center case, also goods issue is posted correctly with VAY cost element to cost center of SD order, but:
creates a CO-PA document without values, but qty, which is not wanted.
I could reset the qty with a special billing type in KE4W, but I still want to make sure somehow, that never a CO-PA document is created and I also would like to understand, why those 2 cases behave differently.
Any idea? Please no proposal with user-exit - in this case I would own billing type prefer.
br
Bjoern
keywords to find this thread later:
KE4M, co-pa, sd order integration, cost center posting from SD, item category

Hi
I would prefer KE4W as the solution... I had a similar situation earlier where in I used exit COPA0005 because I had no other choice... But because you are managing with separate bill type, KE4W is the option
br, Ajay M

MM Open Purchase Order by Cost Center

Does anyone knows of a report that can give me Open Purchase orders Orders by Cost Centers?
Thanks for your help

hi,
Here is your solution:
Check table EKBE..in SE16....
Here AccoutAssigned field is ZEEKN which shows the PO for account assignment...
Now for that PO see the Field ELIKZ ...if its ticked then its open PO....
hope it helps...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Blocking certain cost center in MIGO/MB1A

Experts-
We have one cost center defined specially for transactions going through MM interface. We are using 201/202/161/101/122 movement types in interface.
We donu2019t want this Cost center to be used for goods issue in MB1A, MIGO etc.
Are there any u2018user exitsu2019 available to validate cost center in these transaction. Say: If transaction is MIGO/MB1A and cost center is u2018XXXXu2019 donu2019t post transaction and give error.
Thanks for your help-

Hi,
As of my knowledge there is no possibility to do in MIGO.
Validation & Substitution can only be used in your case.
I have another solution but i am not sure whether we use.
Go to Spro-Mat. Mgmt->Inv. Mgmt & Phy. Inv-> Goods Issue / Trf. mat ->Select Set Manual account ssignment
Make the field Account assignment Supressed for particular Mov type. ( inyour case 201).
Please let me know if any of my words are wrong.
Reg,
Ashok

Restricting issue of goods to cost center with respect to material type

Dear Users,
I have a requirement like we want to restrict issue of goods to cost center with respect to material type i.e., we want to issue goods to cost center only through reservation and that too only for specific material types. Is there any standard solution for this, please provide your suggestions.
Thanks,
Manoj

Hi Ajay,
Thanks for valuable input.
I also thought in the same line , but user has the following concern on this:
Assessment Cycle: As per Users, it cannot be used because this will allocate based on allocation basis. But they need, the values that was posted at the time of transaction and as per materials. So it wont be accurate through Assessment cycle,
OKB9: They have different Cost center for different valuation area for the same GL Account.
Hence through OKB9 also, we cannot post directly to COPA.
That's the reason the above option were not adopted.
My other concern to this is:
In CKM3, we have two lines under consumption, one for Normal sales PGI and other is Cost Center.
After doing revaluation of consumption in CKMLCP, we see one line under Cost Center :Revaluation of Consumption Figure"
My question, where can I see that figure whether in any table or in Cost Center report??
If that is also available we can try to match those values and post to COPA.
Let me know your thought on this.
Thanks and regards
Kami

Separate gl account for cost center for movement type 201

HI Guys,
I have a the following problem:
There are three main functional areas i.g
Production - (Cost Center 10001)
Sales - (Cost Center 10002)
Admin - (Cost Center 10003)
In obyc we use 5 types of valuation classes like three sets different for production, Sales and Admin
Production
P-Electrical (GL Account 50001)
P-Tools (GL Account 50002)
P-Oil Lubes (GL Account 50003)
P-Bearing (GL Account 50004)
P-Belts (GL Account 50005)
Sales
S-Electrical (GL Account 60001)
S-Tools (GL Account 60002)
S-Oil Lubes (GL Account 60003)
S-Bearing (GL Account 60004)
S-Belts (GL Account 60005)
Admin
A-Electrical (GL Account 70001)
A-Tools (GL Account 70002)
A-Oil Lubes (GL Account 70003)
A-Bearing (GL Account 70004)
A-Belts (GL Account 70005)
I want use 5 series gl when I use Production valuation classes, 6 series when I use Sales valuation classes and 7 series when I use Admin valuation classes in VBR general modification but system allows me to use standard valuation classes.
please how I can get this problem get solved that the concerned GL accounts must be hit for proper allocation of expenses by areas.
Thanks
Ahmed

Hi
I think i have to rephrase the question .
When you do a goods issue via migo and movement type 201 the user should not be allowed to input the GL account as it should be automatically determined through valn class setting in GBB-VBR.
But in my case the system is also giving the GL account field as available to user for input .This is wrong .
How to make this field suppress / greyed out is the problem ?

Disable or Validate Order or Cost center in MIGO for Mvmt type 201/261

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for