Disactivate mode protected of the order transport

Hi All;
when i was pressed ctrl+f2 the order transport become protected , how can i disactivate mode protected.
best regards.

Hi,
In se10 single click on the request, then Request/Task -> Request -> Remove Protection.
By the way welcome to SDN

Similar Messages

In continous foto shooting mode (10pics/sec) the order of the photos in photo stream is no longer correct!

Photostream does not rank the photos correct if they are shot in continous mode, so that up to 10 pics/sec have the same creation date. Some of these photos are edited, some not. Maybe it is associated with that.
I don´t know if it´s an Aperture or the photostream problem and how to solve it.

Cocorose20 wrote:
So anyone that has the invite can view it?
Yes. Make sure to turn on Public website on the Shared stream. Select the stream and tap Edit at the bottom.
Private Sharing only works for iOS/Mac users when viewing the Shared stream in iPhoto on the Mac or Photos app on iOS. or with PC users and the iCloud control panel
If you do not have the Public website enabled, the link will not work.

OT : Desable protected mode for OT (work order)

Hi ALL,
For OT , I cilck ctrl+F2 the OT (work order) become protected , how can I disable mode protected .
Best regards.

You can do it via a registry change; I don't know if you can use GPO or similar to achieve this.
For Reader 11 the entry is
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Adobe\Acrobat Reader\11.0\Privileged]
"bProtectedMode"=dword:00000000
For Reader 10 the entry is
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Adobe\Acrobat Reader\10.0\Privileged]
"bProtectedMode"=dword:00000000

The order of my ical 'all day' events changes when i go into print mode?

The order of my ical 'all day' events changes when i go into print mode. What can i do to keep the order of events i so painstakingly created?

Difference between open loop and closed loop mode when finding the index on a stepper motor axis.

I have a test system which uses a PXI-7352 motion controller with a MID-7602 stepper motor drive to position a 200 step/revolution stepper motor with an attached 1000 line encoder. The MID-7602 is configured for 64 microsteps per step, giving 12,800 microsteps and 4000 encoder counts per revolution. The system is controlled using LabView 7.1 and NI-Motion 6.13. To home the motor, I've defined a sequence in MAX which first finds the reverse limit switch and then moves forward to the encoder index pulse.
When finding its reference in open loop mode, the system its reference at the same microstep each time. When findings its reference in closed loop mode, the system finds its reference somewhere within about a 20 microstep wide range.
I hope somebody out there with more experience with this controller can describe the difference between finding the encoder index in open loop mode and finding the encoder index in closed loop mode.
Thanks,
Mark Moss

Hello Mark,
I suspect that the behavior you are experiencing has today
with the resolution difference between your encoder and your
microstepping. Let me illustrate with an
example:
Example Setup
Stepper
Motor
NI
Motion Controller
10
steps per encoder pulse (Every 10 steps the controller gets an encoder
pulse, therefore positions 0-9 all appear to be 0 to the controller)
The
system has a maximum of 3 pull in moves set
Open Loop Scenario
The
system is commanded to go to position 9.
The
controller sends out 9 pulses.
The
motor moves to position 9.
Closed Loop Scenario
The
system is commanded to go to position 9.
The
controller sends out 9 pulses.
The
motor moves to position 9.
The
controller checks its position and sees that it is still at position 0
because it has not received an encoder pulse.
Because
the controller thinks it is still at position 0, it sends another 9 pulses
as its first pull in move.
The
motor moves to position 18.
The
controller checks its position and sees that it is at position 10 because
it has only received one encoder pulse.
Because
the controller thinks it is still at position 10, it sends1 reverse pulse
as its second pull in move.
The
motor moves to position 17.
The
controller checks its position and sees that it is at position 10 because
it has only received one encoder pulse.
Because
the controller thinks it is still at position 10, it sends and additional
single reverse pulse as its third pull in move.
The
motor moves to its final position of 16.
I believe something similar is happening with your
application as it looks for the index pulse.
Because the controller does not compensate for what it perceives as
position error in open loop mode, the motor always goes to the same commanded
position. In closed loop mode, the motor
is bouncing around inside the single index encoder pulse trying to find a
certain position.
There are several recommendations I can make towards
correcting this behavior. These
recommendations are in order of effectiveness:
Setup
your system so that there are more encoder counts per revolution than
steps per revolution.
Turn
off pull-in moves by setting them to 0 in MAX.
Use an
open loop configuration.
Play
around with the pull in window in MAX.
Regards,
Luke H

The order that never arrives

BT is good. At apologising - but nothing else. I have a saga that has been going on since 7 January. Let me explain...
I received an email from BT to move my broadmand to them, Infinity package with unlimited downlaods at up to 80Gb etc. and they would be kind enough to also give me £125 Sainsbury's vouchers in return. I have heard BT horror stories before, so was naturally wary. However a fiew reviews on the internet convinced me they had perhaps mended their ways and I should try. I saw the fibre exchange outside my house (about 30m away) so I knew I was in for good speeds. On 7 January 2015 I took the step and placed the order online, supplying the MAC on the same day from my current provider. I received an email confirming a switchover on 4 February.
Then it all began...
About 3 weeks later I got another email offering high speed broadband with £125 vouchers. This prompted me to check on the status of my order since I hadn't heard any more. The web site said I had no order. I called BT help line and I was told the order had stalled for some reason (no explanation offered) and they would have to start the process all over again, and it would take another month. Needless to say, I was less than impressed and ranted a bit about the extra delay as my daughter was planning a movie sleepover with friends, and the high speed broadmand timing was perfect on the original order.
After jumping through various hoops, I was informed they would send me a router and connect the phone on 4 February (I was already with BT!) and the broadband on 5 February. I accepted this. I was home on 5 February and saw the Openreach team working in the box. My phone line went down, and about 30 minutes later my existing broadband died. "Fine" I thought - they will now connect me to BT. I unplugged my router and plugged in my new HomeHub 5. I looked a little later and the team had leaft. I waited. And waited. And waited. By the evening I suspected something was wrong and called BT on my mobile. (I now had no phone or internet.) Now things get vague. I must have called a few times every day from Thursday, only to be told every time that a fault on the line had been logged, and they had a team assigned to diagnose the fault. I diagnosed it for them - the phone was working, they came, they broke it, they left. No luck - they said within 10 days it would be fixed!
(I must point out here that I was organising a charity event for the following week, and my wife was arranging job interviews, and in the middle of this we now had no phone and no internet. Absolute disaster.)
Don't get me wrong. BT was very apologetic, every time I called, a few times a day. But their apologies and promises to fix the fault didn't help. Finally on the Monday they send another Openreach chap out and he got the phone line working, but not the internet. He had no authorisation to look at the broadband. He was rather horrified at the story so far. I called BT again that evening (from the now working phone) to chase the broadband. I was informed someone would call the next day to confirm the line was working! No matter how many times I told him I was talking on the very phone they wanted to check, the stroy was still the same. He said they would check the line and connect the internet the next day once the line was proven.
The next evening no one had called re the internet (my daughter did take a call earlier in the day when the checked the line.) I called again and was informed (again) they had to check the line the next day and then they would connect the internet. All this between the BT apology line, of course. I was now losing the iwll to live. All I wanted was to get internet so I could continue with my emails. Somewhere between this call and the previous one I was informed that my broadmand had been ordered and I should return the router they sent me. They would restart a new order and would send me a new router. I gave up.
On the Wednesday I was at work and decided to try again with live chat to BT. After going through the whole story again, and getting more apologies, I was told I should talk to the Order Management Team. This finally appeared to be progress. I spoke to a very friendly guy who apologised profusely for the mess I was in. He also confirmed that there was a problem in the exchange outside my house when they came to connect the new system, and that the system then autmatically cancels the order! Go figure. They shouldn't have left my phone disconnected, however. He said he would personally fasttrack my order but I needed to supply a new MAC as mine had now expired. Thinking I was finally getting somewhere, I agreed.
Silly me - this is BT after all.
I tried to get a new MAC, but was informed I couldn't get one as there was already "a PSTN cease order in progress on the line." Calling BT again, I was informed it was because they were already taking action themselves, and that I should stand down - everything was in hand.
One additional "good" bit of information I did receive was that tests on the line showed I still had internet - my previous provider was still active and I should put back my old router! After work I did connect my router and it worked! So now I at least had a working phone and my original internet back. (Why wasn't I told this on the Monday when the first fixed the line?)
Stupidly trusting BT again, and as I was up to my neck in the charity event I was running, I put all this out of my mind until this morning- over a week after I was told all was in hand. I called BT to check on progress. Surprise surprise! There was NO ORDER. I was told I had to place another order. They were even surprised I had returned my previous router - after I was informed I had been asked to and they even sent a returns bag for it! This time I was promised by the chap I spoke to that he would personally handle the order and make sure it went through - after I had obtained another MAC from my current provider.
Of course I now have absolutely no faith in BT or their ability to offer me broadband. I will be signing up with their competition, and I will be taking my phone along elsewhere too. I just wish there was someone I could talk to that understood the issue through all this, rather than a call centre in India with many apologies and no progress.
It's the 21sy century. How hard is it to do this? They do it every day. You would think they would get it right by now.
Bye bye BT
Haydn

Once the Forum Mods have read your post they will post an invite here once you reply to them they will take personal ownership of the problem until resolved.
Do not send them a Personal Message as this is the incorrect contact method and cannot be properly tracked also the mod contacted may not be on shift for sometime and this will delay your help
The forum mods normally reply within 3/5 working days after you have contacted them via their contact form
They will contact you personally by email or phone
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

I have multiple email accounts on my iPad. How do I control the order in which the accounts are displayed?

I have multiple email accounts on my iPad. How do I control the order in which the accounts are displayed?

In landscape mode, the mailbox list is automatically displayed (in portrait mode, you will need to tap the button to,show it).
To edit the list, tap edit as shown below.

How to add a New schedule line and update the order quantity?

Hi all,
I have to add a new schedule line in VA01/VA02 so that when ther is partial confirmed quantity against a schedule line, we have to create a new schdule line based on the existing so that it will contain confirmed in one and unconfirmed in the other.
The schedule line will split once the user go to Header data screen in VA01/VA02. So I used USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAK user exits in MV45AFZZ include program.
I splited the order quantity against the confirmed quantity and added it as new schedule line in the XVBEP internal table and update UPDKZ flags for XVBEP & YVBEP.
Could anyone tell me is there any other way to do this without updating XVBEP? Because it is affecting some other place because of index table is not updating. How to you think use if update xvbap-etenr_high and update index table IVBEP1 for new line insert into XVBEP instead directly inseritng it into?
My code as follows:
xvbep-WMENG = t_temp-WMENG .
modify xvbep TRANSPORTING WMENG.
t_temp1- ETENR = '0002'.
if SY-SUBRC <> 0.
t_temp1-UPDKZ = UPDKZ_NEW.
modify xvbep TRANSPORTING WMENG UPDKZ.
endif.
With Regards
Raj

Have you got thru this one if so please provide me with the solution as i got the same req' ..

Accounting for discounts given at the order entry level

Hi,
I'm Anil Wadhwa and I'm working for Amtrex Hitachi Appliances Ltd., Ahmedabad, India. we have implemented Oracle applications 11i and I'm part of the Order to Cash cycle specifically handling the OM Module.
Initially I had the problem of using the discount feature available in Oracle Advanced Pricing and now I have got the solution for the problem.The problem I was trying to explore a feature whereby I was setting up a qualifier where I'm defining the Customer Class as 'DLR' which would be eligible for discount say @10%.
I subsequently set up a modifier where I defined a modifier type discount @10% and attached it with predefined qualifier at both the header and line level.
When I was trying the order entry the price which was defaulting from the attached price list was not getting reduced by 10%.
Now this problem has been solved by giving a request from the 'Oracle Pricing Manager' called as Build Sourcing Rule.
Now I want to know is there any way of accounting the discount given.
Say my list price is 100 and i have given a discount of 10% and my selling price becomes 90.
Then
Debit Credit
Customer 90 Sales account 100
Discount 10
How should I do the setup for discount and make sure that when the modifier gets applied whatever is the discount goes into the appropriate accounting setup.
I will be obliged if somebody can guide me on this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Anil Wadhwa
[email protected]

Anil,
have you used any algorithms for ariving at discounts?
Thanks
AGK

Ship Complete at the order header level

Hi all,
how do we configure the system to force a sales order to be shipped complete? I think that we have two requirements:
1) The instructions from some of our customers is that all the item / schedule lines on a sale order MUST be shipped at the same time.
2) And once the order is shipped, nothing can be shipped on that order again.
(I am not talking about fill rates or percentages, I am referring to the complete order.)
We are on 4.6C and AFS 3.0B
TIA.

Hi,
In the customer master data > sales area data > shipping view , check the " Complete delivery required by law " box.
This indicates whether a sales order must be delivered completely in a single delivery or whether the order can be partially delivered and completed over a number of deliveries.
And once the order is totally shipped, there would not be any more items left to be shipped as we are configuring it for complete delivery. However, in order to restrict the user not to enter any more materials in the change mode, write an exit program in USEREXIT_FORM_SAVE to disable any changes to the existing order.
Hope it helps.
Thanks & Regards
Sadhu Kishore

Batch at the order header level

Hi ,
When I transfer the production order from SAP ERP to SAP ME , The Batches at the order header level (Goods Receipt) have not been transferred to SAP ME.with out these batches goods receipt in ERP while backflush is failed. How SAP ME can handle this?
Regards,
Guru.

Hi,
In the customer master data > sales area data > shipping view , check the " Complete delivery required by law " box.
This indicates whether a sales order must be delivered completely in a single delivery or whether the order can be partially delivered and completed over a number of deliveries.
And once the order is totally shipped, there would not be any more items left to be shipped as we are configuring it for complete delivery. However, in order to restrict the user not to enter any more materials in the change mode, write an exit program in USEREXIT_FORM_SAVE to disable any changes to the existing order.
Hope it helps.
Thanks & Regards
Sadhu Kishore

Total of the ordered quantity in sales order

Hi
Is there any settings or functionality for the totalling of the order quantity in the sales order as the user requires to see the total number of the units of quantity of order taken and if its less they can still ask for more order from the customer so that the truck is used for its fullest capacity for transport of the materials.
thanks
AJ

Hi AJ,
In the standard system up to ERP 5.0 you could use weight and volume for aggregation. Not very useful.
In SAP ERP 5.0, there is a new functionality called "loading units".
Quick copy/paste from the release notes:
As of SAP ECC 5.00, SCM Extension (EA-SCM 500) you can use a loading unit in Dynamic Transportation Planning of the DSD Backend process. A loading unit is an additional capacity limit that limits the maximum delivery quantity of a vehicle. A loading unit is a unit of measure that is independent of the units of measure in order processing.
For aggregation purposes, the delivery quantities are converted into the loading unit using their conversion factor in the material master. The total quantity in the loading unit is calculated in the order and the delivery and displayed together with the aggregation categories. The loading unit is also shown for information purposes in the shipment as the sum of the deliveries contained in the shipment.
It says SCM Extension, but that's not APO, only an extension, so it is part of the standard system. Even if it is part of the DSD Backend, you might think of using it independently of DSD.
Best Regards,
Franck

I created an album in iPhoto and every time I click on slideshow it plays the pictures backwards from the order in the album. How do I change that?

I created an album in iPhoto and every time I click on slideshow it plays the pictures backwards from the order in the album. How do I change that?

When running a slideshow from an album it will not run properly if the photos are sorted manually. Sort them by any of the other options, title, date, rating, etc. and it will play correctly.
Send a report of the problem to Apple via http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphoto.html.
If you must sort them manually create the slideshow in the slideshow mode in iPhoto, not from an album.
OT

DEFAULT_WHERE in the Order Organizer form

Hello,
I 'm trying to restrict the search results in the Order Organizer form to a specific set of sites using Forms Personalization, and by setting the DEFAULT_WHERE property for the block ORDERS_SUMMARY.
The following is how I have setup for the Personalization:
Condition -> Event = WHEN-NEW-FORM-INSTANCE; Processing Mode = Both (Query & Non-Query modes)
Actions -> Type = Property; Language = All; Object Type= Block; Target Object =ORDERS_SUMMARY; Value = 'ORDERS_SUMMARY.SHIP_TO_ORG_ID IN (SELECT SITE_USE_ID FROM HZ_CUST_SITE_USES_ALL WHERE WAREHOUSE_ID IS NOT NULL'
I have tried the 'Validate' button for any syntactical errors, and no such errors. However, when I launch the form and enter a search criteria the results are NOT getting restricted as per the DEFAULT_WHERE I supplied.
Please assist.
Thanks,
Seshu

Hello,
I 'm trying to restrict the search results in the Order Organizer form to a specific set of sites using Forms Personalization, and by setting the DEFAULT_WHERE property for the block ORDERS_SUMMARY.
The following is how I have setup for the Personalization:
Condition -> Event = WHEN-NEW-FORM-INSTANCE; Processing Mode = Both (Query & Non-Query modes)
Actions -> Type = Property; Language = All; Object Type= Block; Target Object =ORDERS_SUMMARY; Value = 'ORDERS_SUMMARY.SHIP_TO_ORG_ID IN (SELECT SITE_USE_ID FROM HZ_CUST_SITE_USES_ALL WHERE WAREHOUSE_ID IS NOT NULL'
I have tried the 'Validate' button for any syntactical errors, and no such errors. However, when I launch the form and enter a search criteria the results are NOT getting restricted as per the DEFAULT_WHERE I supplied.
Please assist.
Thanks,
Seshu

How can I keep the order of photos in an album when I upload it to Flickr?

When I share an iPhoto album on Flickr, the order of the photos in my album is lost. Apparently Flickr uses the photo date, but that defeats all the manual arranging I have done in my album. How can I preseve the photo order on upload?
Also, the description of each uploaded photo appears in small print and not in the main Flickr label box. This means the description cannot be seen if a photo is viewed in full screen mode. How can I automatically transfer the iPhoto descriptions to the main Flickr label boxes?
Is there a better way to share iPhoto albums on the Web (Picasso)?

I'm glad you found a solution
For for others and you in the future it is important to understand
Albums are a way to VIEW photos in your desired order within iPhoto - the photos do not have any order (in fact they are in files scattered essentially randomly accross your hard drive)
When you move the out of iPhotoand view them in another program that program determines teh order they are viewed in
An easy to see an example is the finder - files exported from iPhoto and viewed via the finder can be viewed in many different sort orders including name, date created, date modified, size, kind and label - none of these have any relation to the order the photos were in the album UNLESS you cause that to happen (like by exporting using sequential file names so teh finder name sort matched the album order) - the order you see photos in is totally determined by the program you are using to view them - if you understand how it views them then you may be able to export them so that the destination program view martches the iPhoto view
To make suggestions to Apple re exporting to Flickr (or any other outsidside service) - iPhoto menu ==> provide iPhoto feedback - and to make suggestiont to thrid party suppliers like the Picasa export plugin contact the developer of that plugin
LN

Disactivate mode protected of the order transport

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for