Discrepancy in PF Calculation

Hi,
The PF is getting calculated for the employees on the basis of their number of days working which is an error. For ex if an employee has worked for 10 days or 23 days a month , PF is calculated accordingly whereas it shld not be done. If an employees basic salary is above Rs6000 standard Rs 780 shld be deducted irrespective of the no of days worked.
I have checked in the IT 587 the option Eligible Pay or PF basis whichever is less is selected for the employees.
Please help me fix this error.

generally we have two options one is
in 587
if u select VPF it will caluculate on with 12% on basic salary
and if u select EPF it will caluculate on 6500 rs check V_T511P
through SM30
and can u be more clear with ur requirement
as PF is statutory deduction we cannot make any changes

Similar Messages

Wrong Calculation of Total Cost in Travel management in PR05

Dear Gurus,
We have filled the expense type in PR05 like,
Paid by company -- 3000
Own Exp. -
1000
Other Exp.----
1000
5000.
So the paid by company is 3000 and Reimbursement is 2000. But when I check report in S_AHR_61016401 - General Trip Data/Trip Totals , it is showing total cost as 8000 (showing Reimbursement as 5000 and Paid by company as 3000) which is
wrong . Please guide why it is showing wrong value and what configuration needs to be done for this? Thanks

Hi
I had faced the same problem..
but the problem was in table, you have to debug you expense type e using t-code se16 NOT sm30..
Please do as i have advised in below link.
Re: perdiem Accomodation and Meals in Transferred (w/CO Receiver).
Or do let me know if still founds any discrepancy in calculation.
Regards,
Muhammad Umer

Time Machine Backup Size Calculation Error

This is what I have:
Internal:
Mac OS partition: 266GB (257GB Used)
BootCamp partition: 32GB ( 12GB Used)
External:
External USB 2.0 HD: 153GB (142GB Used)
TM Backup Drive: 466GB ( 0GB Used)
*What I have excluded:*
- TM Backup Drive
- BootCamp partition
*Therefore what I'm trying to backup are only:*
- MacOS partition
- External USB 2.0 HD
Time Machine Preferences Options Pane reports "Total Included: 398.4GB", and that's totally correct for what I'm intending to backup (i.e. MacOS partition + External USB 2.0 HD = 257GB + 142GB = 399GB). So far so good.
But when TM kicks off after the countdown, an error dialog pops up saying:
*Time Machine Error*
This backup is too large for the backup volume. The backup requires 478.0 GB but only 465.5GB are available.
To select a large volume, or make the backup smaller by excluding files, open System Preferences and choose Time Machine.
[Preferences] [OK]
Now how does TM figure out that 478.0GB number?
If I add up all used spaces for all drives (excl. TM drive), I only get 411GB.
If I add up all capacity of all drives (excl. TM drive), I only get 451GB.
How in the world did TM calculate that 478.0GB number? Why is there a discrepancy between what's reported in the options pane and the error dialog?
BTW, I have verified all my disks and they are all fine.
All my drives and partitions (except the bootcamp partition) are formatted properly to Mac OS Extended (Journaled).
Someone please advice.
Much appreciated.

Disregarding the Mac/Win partitions, my internal HD as a whole is 298GB. My external USB drive is 153GB.
nestea247,
Your computer info says : iMac Aluminum 24" ....... 320GB HD.
So, I assumed your internal HD is 320GB and you are currently using 298GB of it. Therefore my simple calculation was not "298GB + 153GB" but "320GB + 153GB(ca.)". Did I misunderstand?
My point was: For the first-time backup, in order to copy the entire image (including the *free space*) of the volume to backup, TM might think it needs about the same size of backup volume as your internal HD ( + external USB drive, in your case). Not simply adding up the size of the *used space*.
Leter, however, it will get more realistic and adjust to the actual data size; so, after completing all the hard link setup, the size of its backup seems to "shrink." Your TM could be still calculating.... perhaps struggling to adjust? (I too hope it is not a critical bug.)
I'm afraid my reply doesn't help solve the mystery of 478.0GB. Hope someone else can.
Best of luck!

Variance calculation repport (KKS2) different to variance line items (KOB3)

Hi, need your help.
I´ve run variance calculation (KKS2) for one production order, one target cost version and it has calculated correctly all cost element variances. However, when I display variance line items (KOB3) for this order with the same target cost version used in KKS2, calculation is´t correct for all cost element and if I compare it with KKS2 repport, it displays different values. Does anyone know why?
some details that may help:
WIP is customize
The company I´am working for had activated "write line Items" (OKV1) after the golive,
Scrap check box is activate in variance key,
All variance categories are activate,
etcetera
Thank you for your help.
Regards,
André

Hi
I would suggest raise an OSS msg then.. Because i dont see any possible reason why this could happen
In my case, the only discrepancy I found was variance doc was posted to FI and not to COPA because the user did not execute variance calculation in update mode.. So, variance got posted in FI, but not in COPA...
But the posted values always matched in my case,,,
Do update us incase you find solution
Regards
Ajay M

FTE CALCULATION IN R/3

Hi Experts,
I would like to know if there is a standard report in R/3 (NOT BW) which calculates the FTE (Full Time Equivalent).
Thanks in Advance

Hi Smita,
Yes I did it.
It seems to me (through debug) that SUS communicated with R/3 and tax has been calculated in R/3 and get the tax amount back to SUS. Later 'somehow' ( ?!!! ) SUS doesn't use the tax amount in SUS at the line item of the invoice and still the tax amount is zero. So the Invoice (IDOC) to R/3 contains the PO Netvalue (without tax amount) and invoice document is created in R/3. When I analyzed the invoice document in R/3, due to the amount discrepancy ( tax amount is not included in the IDOC as it was not calculated in SUS) the document is not posted.
So I am looking for "someone" who can tell me (not based on the SAP document, based on the REAL experience) YES SUS-Invoice will work in SUS-MM scenario even if the tax calculation occurs in R/3 and the tax amount of the SUS-Invoice line item will be updated before sending (through IDOC) the invoice to R/3.
Please help.
With regards,
Pranav

Error in tax calculations

We are currently having issues with our Tax reporting,
In the transaction S_ALR_87012357 in our production system, and enter the required variants,and get the results.
The input Tax section has V0, V3, V5, which is correct.
But on the sales side, we are seeing the following:
6000 MWS A3 TVA collectee 19,6% 5.500
6000 MWS A3 TVA collectee 19,6% 5.500
The record is for tax code A3, which is associated to 19.6%, which is
should be A5, which is the correct rate of 5.5%. In addition to that,
we are not seeing A0, which is items that are non taxable come through
at all. which are coming through on the V0 side.
It looks like there may be something setup incorrectly which is
resulting in the A3 determination, but the condition record is 5.5% so
we are still getting the proper calculations.
In all the config areas the data seem to be correct.
Please advise on this issue
Edited by: sapsap10 on Aug 24, 2010 2:57 PM
Edited by: sapsap10 on Aug 24, 2010 3:43 PM

We got it worked out,
There was a discrepancy in the entries to the tax percentages in the condition type and the ables, just had to match the entries.
The transaction code VK1X is for the tax conditions, VK11 is to create, VK12 is to change and VK13 is display, we just had to enter VK12 and enter the tax condition MWST (output tax) and the country code and execute it.
We get a tax condition table, where we ensure that the values of A3 and A5 display the right percentage values.
Thanks for the help.

UCCX HR Call Presented Discrepancy

Hi All,
According to UCCX Application Analysis report, the Call Presented = Call Handled + Call Abandoned.
Also, from the UCCX HR Query Design, Call Presented = Call Handled + Call Abandoned + Call Dequeued.
I've no doubt on both the calculation. The problem i'm facing is, the no# of calls presented is not equal to the handled + abandoned + dequeued.
There're 3 calls discrepancy from Call Presented which i couldn't located from above field. Where could be the other possibilities?
TIA

Hi
Maybe they were aborted? There's an aborted + rejected calls report you can run for the same period you run this report to see if they are there.
Otherwise you would need to run a Detailed Call by Call report to see all the calls and count them up in Excel to see where they have gone...
Regards
Aaron

Discrepency regarding values in MCRP and MB5B

Hi everybody!
I have noticed a discrepancy in a report that is run using transaction MCRP (MCRO), and the details in MB5B. From what I understand, MCRP is a strucutre S226. The Values (dollars), are correct on this screen, but look incorrect on MCRP. There is also a custom report that was written, that uses the same structure S226 as a basis. If you look at the screen shot, the actual usage price per unit is around $3.74, it is showing $-522.558 per unit. We believe the quantities are correct but the dollar values are not. We believe the problem is in S226 which is a standard SAP report.
Please help me out with a resolution. Is there any OSS note needed to be raised for it?
Thanks,
Saugata

Hi Saugata and Sanjay
Basically S226 is only a table and doesnot involve or impact calculations.
As there is some custom codes involved into it, you may need to do some debugging.
The process, i may suggest would be to analyse S266 for a month for a given material in the plant. This will give you hints of what value should reflect in your report.
And then check the values of the report. Please check the issued value field in the S226 table, if that is not as per your expectations please raise it to SAP.
From my experience, S226 table never gave issues to me,
Regards
Vivek Singh

Blackberry Calculator

Okay, so maybe this is a little thing for most, but a calculator should be simple right? in the standard calculator take any number and try to add , lets say 5%. You always get the amount plus .05, not 5% of the amount. it works like that on my 9700 so maybe it's something that should be fixed on the playbook.
Just a little gripe, so far actually liking the playbook.

playbook_fan wrote:
It is also wrong when you substract and divide using percentage (i.e. 20-25%=19.75 or 20/25%=80)
Actually, in terms of the mathmatical equation you've presented, that (19.75) is a correct answer, since you're subtracting 25/100s from 20, the answer is 19.75. Likewise, the same is true of the intial post above, where 100+15% is actually stating 100 plus 15/100s would equal 100.15
Regardless, the result of the same equation on the Playbook and on the Storm2 is not identical, and RIM has been notified of the discrepency.
1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

Tax Calculation of free goods

Hi
We have a requirement where the client wants only VAT to be posted in GL accounts and not the price.For this I tried free goods condition type R100 with AltCBV 28.But the VAT value is also coming zero. I want the VAT to be calculated on Pricing condition and then give 100% discount.
Apart from this I also tried to make pricing condition statistical and calculate VAT on it but then also system gives zero value for VAT.
Also wondering if the scenario can be addressed with Free of Change Dellivery.

Hi
Normally in scenario where you are dealing with samples , there are cases you have to charge only TAXES / EXCISE part.
Here my SUGGESTION is you can handle this through a simple sales order process, where you have to configure a new pricing procedure.
1. Create a new document type to handle samples.
2. Create a New pricing procedure where you can keep the basic price condtion as Statistical and rest all same as wht is is there your main pricing procedure. Just juggle with the TO-FROM to capture the TAX part in the total.
3. Doc pricing procedure will help you to pick the new Pricing procedure
4. Now Process this as a normal sales order
5. This new document type will help you to have a proper reporting.
The only constraint here is USER has to punch a fresh order seperately for such scenario. He cannot give a free good in the same sales order which is used as standard.
The other way is you can configure a FREE GOOD Determination procedure as suggested where you need to then have your Single pricing procedure accomodating the same scenario.
Thanks
RB

IF statement in Calculated Field for Share point, doesnt calculate sum in my Excel Pivot table.

Hi Everyone
I used this in SP calculated column field.
=IF([Shift Sched]="1pm to 10pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="2pm to 11pm","1",IF([Shift Sched]="3pm to 12am","2",IF([Shift Sched]="4pm to 1am","3",IF([Shift Sched]="5pm to 2am","4",IF([Shift
Sched]="6pm to 3am","5",IF([Shift Sched]="7pm to 4am","6",IF([Shift Sched]="8pm to 5am","7",IF([Shift Sched]="9pm to 6am","8",IF([Shift Sched]="10pm to 7am","8",IF([Shift
Sched]="11pm to 8am","7",IF([Shift Sched]="12pm to 9am","6",IF([Shift Sched]="1am to 10am","5",IF([Shift Sched]="2am to 11am","4",IF([Shift Sched]="3am to 12pm","3",IF([Shift
Sched]="4am to 1pm","2",IF([Shift Sched]="5am to 2pm","1",IF([Shift Sched]="6am to 3pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="7am to 4pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="8am to 5pm","0",IF([Shift
Sched]="9am to 6pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="10am to 7pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="11am to 8pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="12pm to 9pm","0"))))))))))))))))))))))))
it was able to work fine however my issue is when i extract the information to excel and use a pivot table the table is not able to calulate the sum of the value for this field. Can you please help me with this. this is for an Attendance traker for Night
Differential pay for employees. they create a daily log of their shift schedule and if i summarize this in pivot the value in the calculated field for this is not getting the sum.
Thanks,
Norman

Hi Everyone
I used this in SP calculated column field.
=IF([Shift Sched]="1pm to 10pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="2pm to 11pm","1",IF([Shift Sched]="3pm to 12am","2",IF([Shift Sched]="4pm to 1am","3",IF([Shift Sched]="5pm to 2am","4",IF([Shift
Sched]="6pm to 3am","5",IF([Shift Sched]="7pm to 4am","6",IF([Shift Sched]="8pm to 5am","7",IF([Shift Sched]="9pm to 6am","8",IF([Shift Sched]="10pm to 7am","8",IF([Shift
Sched]="11pm to 8am","7",IF([Shift Sched]="12pm to 9am","6",IF([Shift Sched]="1am to 10am","5",IF([Shift Sched]="2am to 11am","4",IF([Shift Sched]="3am to 12pm","3",IF([Shift
Sched]="4am to 1pm","2",IF([Shift Sched]="5am to 2pm","1",IF([Shift Sched]="6am to 3pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="7am to 4pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="8am to 5pm","0",IF([Shift
Sched]="9am to 6pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="10am to 7pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="11am to 8pm","0",IF([Shift Sched]="12pm to 9pm","0"))))))))))))))))))))))))
it was able to work fine however my issue is when i extract the information to excel and use a pivot table the table is not able to calulate the sum of the value for this field. Can you please help me with this. this is for an Attendance traker for Night
Differential pay for employees. they create a daily log of their shift schedule and if i summarize this in pivot the value in the calculated field for this is not getting the sum.
Thanks,
Norman

If statement in Custom Calculation Script

I have 16 fields and if even one of them ="1" I have to list it in another field. I do not want to count or sum. If one of those fields has a 1 in it I just want the other field to display Y and if none have a 1 I want that field to display N.
Please help.
Thank you in advance~mjc

You need to write a compound logical statement to evaluate all of the values and that statement needs to evaluate to true or false.
Do you know how to write JavaScript?
Do you know how to enter JavaScript calculations into a form field?
For custom calculation of the text field I could write something like:
// define an array of the field names to check
var aNames = new Array("Text1", "Text2", "Text3", "Text4",
"Text5", "Text6", "Text7", "Text8",
"Text9", "Text10", "Text11", "Text12",
"Text13", "Text14", "Text15", "Text16");
// define a logical variable that is true if any field has a value of 1 - default is false or no field has a value of 1
var bMatch = false;
// value for text field
var TextValue = 0;
// logical value of field being equal to 1 test
var FieldIs1 = false;
// loop through all the fields and test the fields value
for(i = 0; i < aNames.length; i++) {
// logically OR the result of field i value equal to true with bMatch
// get the value of field
TextValue = this.getField( aNames[i] ).value;
// test the value of the field
FieldIs1 = Number(TextValue) == 1
// logically OR the 2 values
bMatch = FieldIs1 | bMatch;
} // end field processing
// set the field value
if(bMatch == true) {
event.value = "Y";
} else {
event.value = "N";
You will need to change the field names to match your fields. You can add more field name or remove field names as needed and the script will adjust for the number of field names.

If statement in calculated batch characteristic (dependencies)

I have a little problem with calculating a certain batch characteristic.
The situation is the following:
I have batch char A, batch char B and batch char C. Batch char C is the result of the sommation of char A and B. The problem I have now is that batch char C only should be calculated when batch char A and B are different from 0.
I have a custom build interface that imports QM data to the batch chars. Default, all my batch chars are set to 0 so if I just say $self.charC = $self.charA + $self.charB, I always get a value.
Is it possible to some sort of IF statement to check if the value is different from 0?

Dear,
You need to try with variant table
take all the combination and enter in a variant table and see the result...it works
example
A     B      C
0      0      space
0      1      sapce
1      1      space
I hope you got it

Pension not calculated when EE is hired mid-month

Hi All
Please suggest for the following....
When an Employee is hired in the middle of the month, the system doesn't calculate Pension Contribution.
Like if an EE is hired on 10th April. The system will calculate all payments & deductions, but it is not calculating the Pension Contributions.
I am maintaining IT 169, 171 for Pension Contribution.
The problem I found behind this is.....(WIth the help of an ABAPer)
-: System checks the Payroll Period Start Date with the Org. Assignment start date. When it doesnu2019t match, the system does not calculate the Pension Contribution.
For the time being I solved this through the following action -: In debugging, I canceled this condition (skipped this check). Then it calculated the Pension Contribution.
But, this is not the right solution for achieving that as we are changing standard SAP coding.
Please suggest any solution for the same.
Thanks & Regards

If your schema has p0169 with BEG that will happen, try put below Param1 which fits your requirement.
BEG
Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll period begin date.
No changes within the current payroll period are taken into
consideration.
No proration of contributions takes place, even if the record ends
within the current payroll period.
END
Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll period end date.
No changes within the current payroll period are taken into
consideration.
No proration of contributions takes place, even if the record begins
within the current payroll period.
CHK
Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll check date (the pay date),
regardless of whether the check date falls into the payroll period
itself.
A record whose validity starts after the end date of the current payroll
period is still evaluated if the check date (which lies in the future)
falls within the validity period of the infotype.
FRST
Infotype records are evaluated if there is any intersection of plan
infotype and payroll period. The first intersection is taken to
determine the full period deduction amount which is stored without
proration.
LAST
Infotype records are evaluated if there is any intersection of plan
infotype and payroll period. The last intersection is taken to determine
the full period deduction amount which is stored without proration.

Mid-Month Calculations

I am bringing a fixed asset system online in SAP and during the legacy conversion it was realized that the test system is not calculating the depreciation using a mid month convention. That being said looking at the configuration the company code was setup in 2005 and is in production and is productive (since 2005). So it appears that this setting is global and SAP will not allow me to change these settings to allow mid month calculations. Is this correct? anyone ran across the same issue.

Hi
please read the note 2993 and 39416!
Best Regards,
Blaz

Discrepancy in PF Calculation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for