Dispute Search enhancement

Hi Experts,
I have a specific requiremnent to add new search criteria to dispute search in TELCO_FCC role. These fields belong to Business agreement master data.I have already added corresponding fields in the context (as append structure)  and added to WEB UI.Now the fields are displaying in the screen.
No i need to write codes to perform the search with these newly added fields.So is there any BADI available for dispute search enhancements,if not what approach should i take?Pls replay...
Thanks,
Kumar

Hello Kumar,
please check class CL_CRM_IST_ADJREQ_IL (method: GET_QUERY_RESULT).
The query name is AdjustmentRequestQuery.
The query is used for the search of adjustment requests as well as for the search of disputes.
Hope this informs.
Kind regards,
Heiko

Similar Messages

  • Full Text Search Enhancements in 2012 / 2014

    We are currently using SQL IFTS 2008 but are considering upgrading to either SQL 2012 or SQL 2014 (leaning towards SQL 2012 as it has a longer track record and more service packs).  What are the sql full text enhancements from:
    2008 to 2012?
    2012 to 2014?
    thanks

    Hi scott_m,
    Please refer to the following articles:
    SQL Server 2012 - Full Text Search Enhancements - Ability to search and filter within document properties:
    http://beyondrelational.com/modules/4/whatisnew/361/features/7090/sql-server-2012-full-text-search-enhancements-ability-to-search-and-filter-within-document-propertie.aspx
    Programmability Enhancements:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc645577.aspx
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click
    here.
    Regards,
    Elvis Long
    TechNet Community Support
    Elvis, thanks for the info on SQL 2012 full text enhancements.  I didn't see any info for SQL 2014 Full-Text Search.  Do you have any info on SQL 2014 full text enhancements?
    thanks
    scott_m

  • Microsoft Search Enhancement Pack update error 8024000B

    I KEEP GETTING AN ERROR MESSAGE WHILE TRYING TO USE WINDOWS UPDATE ERROR 8024000B MICROSOFT SEARCH ENHANCEMENT PACK FAILED TO DOWNLOAD NOT SURE WHAT THIS IS OR IF I EVEN NEED IT.
    IN THE LIST OF INSTALLED PROGRAMS FROM WINDOWS THERE IS NOTHING LISTED FOR IT TRIED TO FOLLOW THE ADVICE ON WINDOWS WEB BUT TO NO AVAIL

    Hi
    Check this Microsoft page:
    http://windows.microsoft.com/en-IE/windows-vista/Windows-Update-error-8024000B
    Microsoft says:
    +1. Click Start, and then click Run.+
    +2. Copy the following text, and paste it into the Run text box:+
    *+Cmd /c ren %systemroot%\System32\Spupdsvc.exe Spupdsvc.old+*
    +3. Click OK.+
    +4. Run Windows Update again.+
    Good luck... hopefully this helps

  • Are the search enhancements in Web UI 100 % reliable?

    Dear Gurus
    I have been thinking about this from long time.
    I have seen and followed several ways while enhancing Search components (Eg: BT111S_OPPT).
    I have a scenario. I am looking for the best possible solution so that it will be 100% reliable.
    My scenario:
    We know that Oppurtunities have prospects. Prospects inturn have addresses.
    I wanted to search Opportunities (BT111S_OPPT) based on "City" of the prospect .
    Best solution I found so far  in SDN forum:
    In this case, easiest way is to add the "City" to the Search and Result BOL structures,
    use some BADI and filter the results.
    Now, let us say, I am searching using the city "London".
    The standard search returns 100 Opportunities in this BADI (ofcourse without considering the my input city "London").
    Now I will start filtering.
    Let us say, I don't have any Opportunities (out of these 100) that matches the city "London".
    So I am deleting all the 100 results and returning '0' results to the user.
    But it doesn't mean that I don't have any opportunities that matches the city "London" in my database.
    Those results might be hiding somewhere in the database,  but the standard search is not pulling them,
    just because the maximum number of hits = 100 only.
    So in this case, my custom query is failing.
    Here comes the trickiest part:
    Some guys may argue that in the above sceario, after the filtering is done, if I have "0" results,
    then I must select all the relevant opportunites using a select statement (based on my city "London" ).
    Then execute the standard query again using these Opportunites (to pull the rest of the fields).
    This option looks good. But as you know, the user can use any number of search fields.
    You know that there will be + button in search screen in Web Ui, where the user can add
    as many rows (say 30 rows) as he wants and then select unique field (including my custom field "City")
    in each row, enter a value against it and then "Search".
    So basically, in case after filtering, if I have "0" results,
    when making the select statement to get all the Opportunities,
    I have to consider 30 different inputs in this select statement which is very cumbersome.
    It will be further complicated if user uses *(asterisks) and ranges.
    But if I don't do it this way, my custom enhancement will keep on failing occasionally.  Please suggest your ideas.
    Thanks - Raj

    Hi,
    in the call function of the standard search just comment the line with IV_NUMBER:
    CALL FUNCTION 'CRM_BSP_OIC_1O_SEARCH_FROM_RF'
       EXPORTING
         it_search_tab                   = it_search_tab
    *     IV_NUMBER                       = IV_NUMBER
    *     IV_ARCHIVE                      =
         it_multivalues                  = it_multivalues
    *     IV_ITEMS                        =
    *     IV_EXTERN_CALL                  =
    *     IV_SELECT_FOR_HEADERLEVEL       =
    *     IV_CALL_AUTHORITY_BADI          = 'X'
    *     IV_FASTSEARCH_ACCESS            = ' '
    *     IV_FASTSEARCH_START_ROW         = 1
    *     IV_FASTSEARCH_PAGESIZE          =
    *     IV_SELECT_FOR_ITEMLEVEL         =
    *     IV_AVOID_AUTHORIZATION          =
       IMPORTING
        et_guidlist                     = et_guidlist
        et_return                       = et_return
    *     EV_PARTNER_MESSAGE              =
    *   EXCEPTIONS
    *     DATE_NOT_CORRECT                = 1
    *     NO_CARD_TYPE                    = 2
    *     NO_CARD_NO                      = 3
    *     NO_PROGRAM_ID                   = 4
    *     OTHERS                          = 5
    Kind regards
    Manfred

  • BP Search enhancement in CIC0

    Dear all,
    I've a requirement of enhancing the BP search in CIC0. For that I've done the following steps :
    Step 1: Modified the standard html and uploaded it.
    Step 2: In SPRO -> "Define profiles for search strategies" . created a new profile and given z_ccmcs_bpsubcreate2
    Step 3: In SPRO -> "Define customer specific search control". added z search components
    Step 4: Appended structure CCMADDRESSFIELDS with my z fields.
    Step 5: Copied the function group CRM_CIC_BP_SUB to Z_CRM_CIC_BP_SUB and replaced CCMCS with Z_CCMCS. In Z_CCMCS_BP_SUBCREATE2, replaced all the function module names which belongs to the copied function group.
    After these steps, I'm facing the following problems :
    1) The search result is shown only for Name First & Last fields, and from that search result, if any record is selected, nothing happens (the other fields on the screen are not populated).
    2) For some search fields, it shows error "No search rules defined" and for some search fields, it shows the standard BP search help.
    3) In the Business Partner area, if partner is put & Enter is pressed, the confirm icon is still not enabled.
    Do I need to configure some settings?? Please help me out for the same.
    Regards
    Alpa

    Hi guys,
    I have a requirement similar to Alpa. I have to add fields both part of CCMSEARCH_STRUCT and not. I have to add fields for BP and Address. I'm developing on CRM 5.0.
    - I have copied, modified, and uploaded the standard HTML.
    - I have copied the search element (for part of CCMSEARCH_STRUCT only) in SPRO -> "Define customer specific search control"
    - I have copied search profile "BPSEARCH" in In SPRO -> "Define profiles for search strategies".
    This post is age a year ago. Alpa, did you solved the problem? mind to share your solution with me? I can be reached at [email protected]
    I understand that i have to enhance some FM in addition to the steps above to make it work. But which FM? do I have to enhance "CCMCS_BP_SUBCREATE2"? How about "CCMCS_ADDR_SEARCH_CONTROL" and "CCMCS_BP_SEARCH_CONTROL"?
    Urgent reply needed. Points will be rewarded for helpful reply. Thanks everyone!

  • PC UI Advanced Search - Enhancement by standard fields of transaction table

    Hello,
    we are using CRM 5.0 SP13.
    We are familiar to enhance PC UI applications (BP+transactions) by EEW customer fields and how to use/hide them in the search functionalities etc.
    But now we need to enhance the advanced search for leads by the POSTING_DATE date of table CRMD_ORDERADM_H. Unfortunytely in PC UI advanced search structure for leads CRMT_BSP_LEA_SEARCH_ME the POSTING_DATE is not included like it is in the opportunity advanced search structure CRMT_BSP_OPP_SEARCH, where we were able to enhance the search easily by CRMC_BLUEPRINT_C customizing.
    The idea is to solve the problem to create EEW fields POSTING_DATE_FROM and POSTING_DATE_TO like they are existing in CRMT_BSP_OPP_SEARCH and use them in advanced search. So far no problem in creating and displaying the EEW fileds by CRMC_BLUEPRINT_C.
    But the part we are missing is to link the new EEW fields to the standard database-field POSTING_DATE and implement the search functionality "Searching by select option POSTING_DATE_FROM and POSTING_DATE_TO".
    Anybody any experience to link EEW-fields to standard fields of database tables for advanced search functionality in PC UI.
    Thank you for your help in advance.
    Best regards
    Marco

    Hi Marco,
    The best option here is to create redefination of the query method of the leads search class. Here you can first ensure that the call to the query method of super class takes place and the next would be do mapping between custom fields to local structure and then call the relevant API's to fetch the data.
    Best Regards, Adil

  • Search Enhancement-Custom fields in Result List

    Hello Experts,
    As per the wiki https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/CRM/TransactionSearchEnhancement by Stephen I have enhanced the search of service order. Custom fields are actually added to the Service Order header and Search by using EEWB.Search is working fine after the implementation of the BADI BADI CRM_RF_SEARCH_EEW
    Now we also want the custom fields to be show in the search result as well.It will be great if you can kindly help me with the standard process for this.If I enhance the search result BOL with the custom fields will it work?
    Thanks & Regards
    Anupam

    Hello Deb,
    The search criteria needs the procedure you fallowed ,But not the result list.
    In the Context node you can directly add the attributes you required from the BOL.
    1.Enhance the component and View.
    2.In the context Node BTQRSRVORD on attributes Rignt Click and say create
    3 Give the name of the fields.
    4.Say add Model Attribute
    5.BOL entity Come byitself BTQRSrvOrd
    6.In the BOL Attribute go to f4 help and Scroll down and expand relations
    7.find the Ibase relations and add the fields.
    No Coding is required ..All the methods get generated and results get populated .
    The only thing is you have get the proper fields and realations.
    Sree.
    Edited by: Sree on May 20, 2010 6:26 PM

  • Quick Search Enhancement

    Hello all,
    I encountered a requirement, where I need to make an enhancement in the Inbox search functionality-<b>Quick search dropdown</b> to include a new set of predefined search criteria to be populated there.
    Can anyone please help me with the configuration steps and also any other development activities involved in this enhancement ?
    Your help in this will be greatly appreciated and points will be rewarded.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Navin Krishnan

    Hi Navin,
    Can you please try through PCUI application. It can be useful for your requirement.
    And possible go through the following link related to you.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm40/helpdata/en/e2/e91ea9fb101f4e815ca3b05b59b3f0/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    Johnny.

  • BP Search Enhancement

    Could some one guide me or send me some relevant documents related to how do I enhance the BP search In win client .E-mail  [email protected]
    Thanks in advance .
    Regards
    Kumar

    Hi Padma,
    Refer to the link below,
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f4943d9b-0801-0010-c59e-bc4c9ab57931
    Best Regards,
    Pratik Patel
    <b>Reward with Points!</b>

  • Vehicle search enhancements to include iobject Z set types

    Hi,
    Could anyone tell me whether it is possible, or comment upon, the idea of using/enhancing the standard vehicle search function module (/DBM/VM01_VEHICLE_SEARCH) to include customer defined Z IOBJECT data?
    There are a number of BAdIu2019s available to influence the vehicle search however I am not sure if any of them quite seem to cover this. Currently if you try passing a Z table as an entry in the search criteria table (IT_SEARCHCRIT) you get a termination because a subsequent FM (VELO14_GUID_SELECT) looks for the vehicle field VGUID however set types use a different field (PRODUCT_GUID).
    If the standard search function could incorporate customer set types then it would greatly help with modularisation and search optimisation.

    Hi
    please have a look at the following notes on the SAP Service marketplace
    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/905556
    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/900850
    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/903914
    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/903913
    best regards
    Stephan Bantlin

  • Sales order search enhancement

    Hi,
    I am new to web ui.
    My requirement is
    to add a custom field to the sales order search criteria.
    Please provide any documents which helps me in solving the requirement .
    Thanks,
    Srinivas.
    Moderator message:
    Please review rules of engagement in asking for documents.  Please also do a search in this forum as there are several posts on this question
    https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/x/FgQ
    Edited by: Stephen Johannes on Feb 26, 2009 8:46 AM

    Hi Srinivasa,
    This is the code snippet.
    *     Get the First entity
          lr_entity ?= me->typed_context->searchresult->collection_wrapper->get_first( ).
    *     Loop on the collection
          WHILE lr_entity IS BOUND.
    *       Get the Sales Order attributes
            lr_entity->get_properties( IMPORTING es_attributes = ls_sales_order ).
            IF ls_sales_order <> XXXXX.
              me->typed_context->searchresult->collection_wrapper->remove( lr_entity ).
            ENDIF.
    *      Get the next entity
            lr_entity ?= me->typed_context->searchresult->collection_wrapper->get_next( ).
          ENDWHILE.
    Regards,
    Masood Imrani S.

  • Activity Search Enhancement

    Hi All,
    I know that class CL_CRM_QACT_RUN_BTIL is triggered for activity search.
    I want to know where in SPRO config is this class assigned to query object BTQAct so that it is fetched in runtime.
    I wish replace this with a Z* class with custom search logic.
    Thanks in advance.
    Naveen

    Dear Naveen,
    You can refer to Maintenance View CRMV_OBJ_BTIL and mention the name of the Custom Class here against the Object BTQAct
    Hope this hlps.
    Thanks
    Vishal

  • Search Complaints by Code/Codegruppe/Katalogkart @ item level in Web Ui

    Hi All,
    I have a requirement to search complaints BUS2000120 in the Advance search screen BT120S_CPL by item code,codegruppe & katalogcart.
    So what i did - have added the fields in the search structure throgh an append & the fields are available on the screen & then implemented the EH_ONSEARCH event to include those parameters in the add parameters method. Based on the CRMC_REPDY reporting framwork. It works fine for the header level code/codegruppe/katalogkart. But when I implement the item level code_item, codegruppe_item & katalogkart_item (as per the CRMC_REPDY) - it does not work at all.
    So I am wondering do i have to pss some additional parametsr for the item level search??
    though these item level fields are given in the CRMC_REPDY table - standard reporting framework has to take care of this when i add the parameters CODE_ITEM / CODEGRUPPE_ITEM / KATALOGKART_ITEM
    Please share you thoughts!
    Thanks a lot!
    Regards,
    Tarak

    I think you'd have to find some BAdI to actually do the search on code/codegroup etc. Try to find out if there any is BAdI available for search enhancements.
    Regards
    Prasenjit

  • Dispute case statuses

    hi,
    can you please let me know the significances of the system statuses for dispute cases? like confirmed, i understand after this status, you cannot edit things anymore.

    The status of a dispute should indicate where in the process chain the dispute is.
    Ideally a process map is designed for processing and resolving disputes.
    You may have a map as follows
    1 - Dispute "created"  the dispute has been created
    2 - Dispute "assigned"  an individual has been assigned to the dispute to process it
    3 - Dispute "in processing" the individula has received the dispute and is working on it
    4 - Dispute  "credit requested"  a credit has been requested
    5 - Dispute  "credit raised" a credit has been raised - added to the dispute
    6 - Dispute "no action required" a close status where no action is required - dispute is resolved
    7 - Dispute "closed" customer has closed the dispute - items to be included in collectable amount
    8 - Dispute "void" dispute was created incorrectly.
    The above list is just a sample. You could use all of them, or just some of them, or even create new ones.
    By having different statuses, it provides the user better information relating to the progress of the dispute, and enhances reporting.
    Hope this helps.

  • Enhancement for bin to bin stock transfer

    hi,
    when i am using stock transfer bin to bin using LT01 transaction, an information message have to raise when same material/batch if destination bin already having.........
    i already searched enhancement for above process "MWMTO001" i am correct or not?
    Thanks
    Muthuraman.D

    Yes, that's correct. You are using the right enhancement.
    It has the LTAK and LTAP tables which is the transfer order tables. This function will trigger during the TO creation.

Maybe you are looking for