DMEE tax model

Due to spanish legal tax requirements (witholding tax model 180) we need to create a DME file that complies with the legal requirements, for example a parameter stating if the declaration is ordinary/complementary/sustitutive has to be informed in the file in order to be properly imported and accepted. This data is available in structures that are supposed to be available when customizing the file structure in transaction DMEE (they actually exist in newer releases), the DMEE funcionality therefore does not cover tax requirements and we think that is either a program error or a workaround has to be proposed.
Additionally following with these requirements we found that even in customizing of the DMEE file is stated a fixed lenght of 250 char the actual file imported does not respect that and ignores the blanks in the far right of each line, for this issue, we have investigated notes and tested a workaround on saving the file directly to the server and after uploading it to the PC with report RFASLDPC, in that case the results are even worst because the complet structure and lenght is messed up.
Please verify this problems and bring a solution to solve them because all are legal requirements of the tax authorities in Spain.
Thanks in advance.

Hi:
Please refer to the link given
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/3e/54683864b4a245e10000009b38f8cf/content.htm
Regards

Similar Messages

Us Payoll : Tax Model Changes : Creation Of A New Tax Class : Impact

Hi Experts,
Has anyone earlier created a new tax class specification of PC 71 for a wagetype so that it is taxed only for a particular tax authority , if yes how did you handle the impact on the other tax authorities ,did you create new entries ( with the new specification ) for other tax authorities as well so that the existing tax calculations happen as it is.
The issue is explained IN DETAIL below :
We have one requirement to include certain wage types X Y Z for the calculation of Transit District Excise Tax /435 in the tax authority ABC
When we checked our system, for these wage types X Y Z the corresponding tax classification is set as 0 ( Regular taxable wages ) which is linked to tax type 1 and not linked to 35 tax type , so we need to assign it to a specification which is having both 1 and 35 tax types. We can assign this to 935 which is linked to both 1 and 35 however this will impact all the wage types that are linked to 0 ( Regular taxable wages ) specification in PC 71.
Our business does not want these other wagetypes to be impacted i.e the requirement is that ONLY X Y Z wagetypes should be included in the calculation of Transit District Exercise Tax /435 for the tax authority ABC.So the option is that we have is to create a new 71 tax class specificaiton say * and assign it to these wagetypes and then create a new entry assining this * in the table T5UTM to 935 for this tax authority so that it is taxed for Transit District Excise Tax /435.
However since we are assigning a new tax class specffication to these wagetypes, there will be a impact on ALL THE OTHER tax authorities where these wagetypes X Y Z are having an old specification of 0 ( Regular taxable wages ). So we have to create newe entries with this new specification * in the table T5UTM so that the current tax calcutions are not impacted.
We have about 500 tax authoties or 500 tax models where we will have to create new entries with the new tax class specirication '" * " , so that these wagetypes are taxed as they are being taxed today, for all of the other tax authorities.
Has anyone earlier created a new tax class specirication of PC 71 , if yes how did you handle the impact on the other tax authorities ,did you create new entries for other tax authorities., which is next to being impossible as we cannot create 500 entries.
Alternatively we are looking at using the TAX MODIFIER for this requirement , please advise if anyone has used TAX MODIFIER for this kind of a requirement mentioned above. Any suggestions are most welcome.
Regards,
Vineeth
Please Dont use Caps letters
Edited by: Moderator

Yes we are also referring to the same and this is the actual issue we have , each tax authority has its own tax model. We have to customize (add) this new tax type in the tax models or it won't be considered ( as you have mentioned ).
But we have over 500 different tax models and we cannot be adding this new specification in each tax model , Please advise how this could be handled other than writing a rule. We are just thinking loud if there is anything that we are missing.
These wagetypes are quiet common in all tax authorities , so have to be added in all the tax models i.e. for all tax authorities.

Duplicates in Tax Model per BSI

How do I find and correct Duplicates in the Tax Model/Tax Combos?
I have received BSI error 1401 in four states (CA, AZ, DE, MS) and have been told that I have "duplicates" but I have no idea how to identify the duplicate(s) in question.

Hi,
Maybe are you talking about BSI error 4101 instead of 1401? If so, here are some explanation about
your query:
Please check tables T5UTE, T5UTM and T5UTY for the authorities FED and state tax authorities.
T5UTE - Each tax authority is assigned to a taxability model
T5UTM - Each taxability model is assigned one or more tax type
        combinations
        For each model, different tax type combinations may be specified
        for different resident/work/UI tax areas, tax modifiers (TXMOD),
        and taxability classes (TXBCL).
        Taxability class is the value of processing class 71 in table
        T512W; thus, it is defined at the wage type level.
T5UTY - Each tax type combination is assigned one or more tax types.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Daniela.

Tax model, Tax combinations and Tax types for New Jersey

We are having problems in computing taxes correctly for Employees who have their Work tax area and Residence tax area as New Jersey.
Can anyone please help with the best Tax model, tax combination and Tax types for these combination for New Jersey.
It will be better if you have employees in New Jersey, who have their Taxes deducted correctly.
We are in an implementation and unfortunately it has been a while since we have applied any Tax related SAP notes or BSI tubs.
Appreciate all help.

i have been researching and have found that NJ state taxes are like Puerto Rico taxes. The Schema UMOT may have to be used with a different modifier to calculate Withhoding tax for NJ , different from FED.
Has anyone of you used this schema ? I find that UTAXRAUTHY ( tax authority) is an Operation in the deecisison tree .Can anyone confirm if Tax type is also an operation?
I shall appreciate any related feedback.Thanks.

Tax Model

Hi,
Existing process: GTLI creates two wage types -
/BT1 which is taxable but not taxed (creates Q01) which has a value of "5" for processing class 71 and 3405 which is Taxable but not taxed and has a value of "K".
Requirement: GTLI needs to be added along with /701 for MO02 tax model.
If I take out the entry for tax model 33 for "5" - /Q01 stops getting created but there is one more WT3206 also has this value. I need this to be added to /Q01.
Request suggestion how this can be done.
Thanks
Karthick

i have been researching and have found that NJ state taxes are like Puerto Rico taxes. The Schema UMOT may have to be used with a different modifier to calculate Withhoding tax for NJ , different from FED.
Has anyone of you used this schema ? I find that UTAXRAUTHY ( tax authority) is an Operation in the deecisison tree .Can anyone confirm if Tax type is also an operation?
I shall appreciate any related feedback.Thanks.

Tax Model Tables

Hi All,
Im looking for copies of SAP-delivered tax model tables T5UTE, T5UTM, T5UTY. In spreadsheet would be great.
Can anyone assist?
Brandyn

Hi Brandyn,
I am not clear with your requirement by mentioning the 'SAP delivered', if you have access to the system you can download them right away. The other option is you can ask your Basis team to help you out by extracting the data from 000 client.
BR
Upen

Tax model/type/authority to Processing class

Hi All,
I am configuring tax type, tax authority, tax model, can anyone tell me how we will attach all this things to Processing class of any wage type.
I have checked in my existing wage type PC71, but it is not there.
Thanks,
Kumar

The tax class in your tax model is the specification for processing class.
If you used the existing tax class in your model no need to do any thing, based on PC71's value , the tax model will be called. And the taxes will be accumulated to respective tax types / tax auth.
If you creating a new tax class in your model , then that value will appear in PC71's value. The tax model will be called based on this new value you are selecting for any wagetype.. And the taxes will be accumulated to respective tax types / tax auth.
Thanks,
Amosha

Tax model 390 (Spain)

Hi,
Is there any standard transaction to obtain tax model 390 for Spain?
Thanks

Hi:
Please refer to the link given
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/3e/54683864b4a245e10000009b38f8cf/content.htm
Regards

Help on tax authority/tax model/tax combo

gurus,
can anybody please tell me what a tax authority is/tax combos and tax models are.
im a starter and would like to know how they work in the net payroll.plz let me how they are configured.
any input will be greatly appreciated.
regards
dev

Hi, if it is a statuatory change, please do not worry about it as SAP would be releasing a patch soon. All that you need to do is to ask the Basis team to apply it. Then, make sure that the tables mentioned in the patch are updated accordingly and also, please test it for one employee before you move this.

Tax Models

I need information about Taxablity Models.
Tax Config in SPRO has 2 Parts, First Time Generation and Subsequent Main. Whats the Difference?
Basically AZ Tax Type 15 , Er Job Devmt Assessmt Tx is not there so i have updated table
V_T5UTD - Assignment of Tax Authorities to Tax Type
And it worked, now this is also available in First time config node.
Is it a good idea? or i am missing something/doing wrong.
In my Mind Subsequent can only be done if First Time is done.
i..e if i dont add to V_T5UTD and it is not in First time config i cannot do Subsequent. Correct?
But then i am thinking in which case do i need Subsequent maint.if it works with First Time?
Need Help, i m confused.

Hi ,
Can somebody help me to create new tax authorities(BSI version 10.0) in R/3 system. When i tried to enter below entries in the table V_BTXTAXC , system displays " there is no tax authoritiy " 391954 " in the BTXAUTH table .
TUB No.
BSI Code
SAP Code
Description
BSI TUB13
391954
OHTS
Butler Twp-Vandalia Jedz Towns
How do we maintain these entries, Please help.
Thanks
Mary

Model 415 for Canary Islands Tax Auth.

Hi all,
¿Anyone knows how to get the flat file of declaration form 415 for Canary Islands Tax Authorities?
This form is very similar to 'DAO 347', but whit different file format.
Thanks a lot.

Hi Manny,
               Thnx for the input. However I checked table T5UTX to see the ceiling there. The ceiling is 9000.00. However amt in RT Table for /715 wage type is much below the ceiling value i.e 1,210.51.
Amt in /615 = 1,213.47 . This diff of $ 2.96 is due to the presence of Gross-up wagetype 12SC. I have checked the Tax Model settings for DC thoroughly to see that this wagetype 12SC gets included in the taxable for Er Job Devmt Assessmt tax. And /615 is being calculated as expected in the RT Table. The problem lies with /715 !!
I am a bit confused by the presence of 2 entries for Tax Type 15 in the payroll log in Func USTAX:
Tax authority DC District Of Columbia DA01
Tax Category                                                  Tax.inc    Tax-free Inc.Declare Tax.earning         Tax
01 Withholding Tax                          (REG)     1213.47        0.00     1213.47     1213.47            57.00
10 Employer Unemployment Tax      (REG)     1213.47        0.00     1213.47     1213.47           15.78
15 Er Job Devmt Assessmt Tx      (REG)        2.96            0.00        2.96        2.96                    0.01
15 Er Job Devmt Assessmt Tx      (REG)     1210.51        0.00     1210.51     1210.51             2.42
41 Employee Disability Tax             (REG)        2.96             0.00        2.96        0.00                  0.00
Why are there 2 entries separately for Tax Type 15 ? The answer might be the solution to this issue.
Please help.
Thanks And Regards,
Somdeb Banerjee.

Tax tables & model

All,
As my client is not operating in all states, i wanted to check if we still have to create all the tax tables (tax authorities,tax models etc) completely new? Or can i just delete the tax authorities where my client is not operating?
Any response will be appreciated.
Thanks

Hello,
You can have tax authorities in your system even though you dont operate in the authorities, but you dont need to create Taxability model for the authorities in T5UTM and T5UTY, so even if mistake tax authorities are added in IT 207 or 208, tax will not be calculated.
Kindly refer the WIKI link on the Taxability model
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPHCM/Taxability+Model
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPHCM/Tax+Authorities
With Regards,
S.Karthik

Corporate Tax in Spain

Hi , experts!
Do you know SAP provide any report or tools to facilitate the corporate tax report in Spain?
Including the 2 model,
MODEL 202: Partial payment of Corporate Tax
MODEL 200: Annual Corporate Tax
Many thanks!
Yours,
Kelvin

Hello Hao,
I hope this can help :
Form 110: This form is used for a quarterly or biannual summary of withholding tax. To create the DME file, use programs RFKQSE10 and RPC11XE0.
Form 111: This form is used for a monthly summary of withholding tax for companies whose annual business volume exceeds ESP 1 billion. To create the DME file, use programs RFKQSE10 and RPC11XE0.
Form 115: This form is used for a withholding tax summary for real estate rental. To create this report, use the program RFKQSE10.
Form 190: This form is used for an annual summary of withholding tax. To create the DME file, use programs RFKQSE10 and RPC190E0.
Form 210A: This form is used to create a DME file for the 210A report. This report contains payments and withholding tax amounts for vendors who carry out business in Spain, without actually being a resident there. Both payments and down payments are reported. To create this report, use the program RFKQSE20.
From 340 : Tcode S_E4A_94000356 - Report RFIDESM340
Form 915: This form is used only for a withholding tax summary for the province of Navarre. To create the DME file, use programs RFKQSE10 and RPC11XE0.
Form 190: RFKQSE11
Good luck
Tamim

Can you use two tax classes in the same payroll run?

Hi,
I have a wage type that is currently set to Tax Class 1 (fully taxed) for processing class 71, I need to change it to tax class 7 (Withholding and SUI only) and have it computed as part of the regular payroll run and also by itself using offcycle.
When I have it set as Tax Class 1, all is well, when I change it to tax class 7, I get the error...
BSI Messages and Status 4101 CAN NOT PROCESS DUPLICATE RESIDENT STATE FED
This is the first time we're using this tax class and I think i have it set up correctly in the tax model but am not for sure.
Any suggestions? I'd really appreciate some guidance as I've looked
Thanks!
Stephanie Abrahamson

I think you should not change the PRCL 71 from 1 to 7 wide open. Start it with begin date of pay period you want and keep the history with PRCL 71 1.
As well check the config of tax model.
Arti

Request for the creation of a new Unemployment account for tax

Hi Guys,
This is a question with regard to US tax. We have received a request for the creation of a new Unemployment account for the payment of taxes. This is because the account assignment number has changed for a particular company code in Tennassee state. Please let me know where this change could be made in SAP.
Thanks,
Subbaiah

Subbaiah,
Table T5UTL is used for New Tax Company Codes. If this is a new legal entity, youu2019ll need to set up the Tax Company here. Youu2019ll also need to assign at least one Personnel Area to this new Tax Company. This must be established in order to update the next table shown below, but only if itu2019s a new legal entity. The user will know.
Table T5UTH is for establishing the account number to be used in BSI. It must be established in order to update the next table shown below.
Table T5UTI is for assigning account numbers by Tax Company Code. Youu2019ll need one for Tax Authority TN, Tax Type 10. The user will need to supply this information to you.
Table BTXRATE will need to be updated with the Tax Company Code, year, and the State Unemployment Insurance rate & taxable wage amount.
Once this is done, youu2019ll need to update BSI.
If Tennessee is a new state, youu2019ll have work to do with the tax models.
Regards,
Howard

DMEE tax model

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for