DNS is working but unresolved DNS issue remains

Perhaps someone can help me with a DNS issue.
I have DNS working fine on a my Mac server.
I take responsibility for the domain (example.com) and establish the primary zone with the nameserver as server.example.com.
I also setup a A record for the phrase www.example.com to point to the externally hosted website.
That all works fine inside the network.
sudo changeip -checkhostname resolves just fine.
The problem is that I need to establish a reference for a test website : www.example.com/wp-admin so that it works inside the network.
That URL has a different IP address than the www record.
A) I'm not sure how to add the part of the URL past example.com
B) I cannot add a / as part of the machine name - the server software forbids it.
Can anyone clue me into how to do this?

DNS is not the tool you need here.
DNS translates host names and (for some protocols) IP ports, but doesn't translate file paths.
In the classic URL scheme (and simplifying things), the DNS translation deals with getting an IP host address for the string that's between the first double // and the subsequent / in the URL, and nothing else.
To differentiate further, you can either use a virtual host (what Apple calls a "Site" in Server Admin) on the target server, or can configure the web server (usually via a rewrite rule) to redirect the incoming HTTP request to the path you want.
Depending on exactly what you're up to here, sometimes a reverse web proxy can be used. A reverse web proxy is where you're forwarding an incoming HTTP request from one server along to another web server, either on the same or another IP host.
[Here|http://labs.hoffmanlabs.com/node/1329] is a write-up on virtual hosts on Mac OS X Server.

Similar Messages

  • Internet sharing works but the DNS part doesn't

    I'm posting this message because I believe it is a bit different from other 'Lion internet sharing' posts in terms of the source of sharing and also the results I get.
    Similar to other users experiencing the same problem, my internet sharing setup stopped working as expected after upgrading to Lion. However, I can't say it stopped working completely. It still does work but the DNS part doesn't. This means I can still perform pings, ssh and socket connections from computers using the shared connection. But I cannot browse the internet because web site names can't be resolved.
    For example, my MacPro has two Ethernet interfaces. On one of them (en0) I vpn when connecting to work using a VPN service I created via System Preferences => Network. I used to share that VPN connection to computers using the 2nd one (en1). The other computers are linked to (en1) through a multiport hub. This setup used to work flawlessly in Snow Leopard and multiple users could use the shared vpn internet connection.
    After the upgrade to Lion I can still see other computers on the local network and also ping any external internet site. I can even use Safari and navigate my ISP's home page using its IP address only. However, DNS doesn't work and internet domains cannot be resolved by name so internet browsing is not possible.
    Furthermore, when I don't VPN to work but simply share the connection to the internet from (en0) to computers using (en1) everything works as it used to in Snow Leopard. The difference here is that the same DNS servers are used by both network services.
    So far I'm stuck with these findings and I don't know where else to look for answers. Any input or feedback is greatly appreciated.

    I've to admit that i don't even know what VPN means.. but..
    I have an 27" iMac (mid 2010), a iPhone 4 and a Macbook Pro 13" (mid 2009) .. and i used to share my ethernet connection to wi-fi on Snow Leopard. Since i upgraded to Lion (i'm using it since the first DP, and i think the internet sharing was working under the 1st DP .. i'm not pretty sure), it just doesn't work.
    Just like solongpc, it does activate the internet sharing, my other devices can see and connect but neither of then (my iMac - host or my mbp and iphone) can navigate on the internet. And when i turn off my internet sharing (on my iMac), it still not acessing any website.. and i've to restart my moden.

  • Line back up and working but a small issue if anyo...

    My phone line stopped working last night but infinity was not affected! Reported the issue at 11.40 last night to the automated service. The line is now back on and working but here is the issue I've got a dial tone but with breaks in it as if I have an answer phone msg on the line but 1571 is not active on my line! What could it be? Any help would be much appreciated..........
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Problem has now been fixed.

  • Arch router / connection share dns lookup works, but no ping [solved]

    I lost some config and forgot how to set this up. I have a dual nic arch box with some clients behind it. dnsmasq serves dhcp and dns on the LAN side (192.168.10.0/24). WAN port of arch box (192.168.1.201) talks to actual modem (192.168.1.1).
    router
    root@router ~ # ip addr
    1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 ::1/128 scope host
    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    2: enp2s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:25:90:95:08:40 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.1.201/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global enp2s0
    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::225:90ff:fe95:840/64 scope link
    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    3: enp3s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:25:90:95:08:41 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.10.1/24 brd 192.168.10.255 scope global enp3s0
    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::225:90ff:fe95:841/64 scope link
    valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    root@router ~ # ip route
    default via 192.168.1.1 dev enp2s0
    192.168.1.0/24 dev enp2s0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.201
    192.168.10.0/24 dev enp3s0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.1
    root@router ~ # sysctl net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
    net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1
    root@router~ # ping archlinux.org
    PING archlinux.org (66.211.214.131) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from gudrun.archlinux.org (66.211.214.131): icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=70.0 ms
    64 bytes from gudrun.archlinux.org (66.211.214.131): icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=70.0 ms
    client
    root@lucid-desktop:~# ip addr
    1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
    2: can0: <NOARP> mtu 16 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 64
    link/can
    3: can1: <NOARP> mtu 16 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 64
    link/can
    4: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:1f:f2:09:19:89 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.10.101/24 brd 192.168.10.255 scope global eth0
    root@lucid-desktop:~# ip route
    192.168.10.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.101
    169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1000
    default via 192.168.10.1 dev eth0 metric 100
    root@lucid-desktop:~# nslookup archlinux.org
    Server: 192.168.10.1
    Address: 192.168.10.1#53
    Non-authoritative answer:
    Name: archlinux.org
    Address: 66.211.214.131
    root@lucid-desktop:~# ping archlinux.org
    PING archlinux.org (66.211.214.131) 56(84) bytes of data.
    *crickets*
    root@lucid-desktop:~# wget archlinux.org
    --2013-04-02 07:51:19-- http://archlinux.org/
    Resolving archlinux.org... 66.211.214.131
    Connecting to archlinux.org|66.211.214.131|:80...
    Do I need iptables on? This is all with it off.
    edit: yup
    iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o enp2s0 -j MASQUERADE
    Last edited by tladuke (2013-06-06 19:37:44)

    The problem has been resolved. It was the line provider that made a mistake bij giving the wrong line speed at the second pvc.
    After they made the correct changes the connection was made between the 2 routers over the IPVPN
    Router config Check
    Router firmware Check
    First pvc Check
    Second pvc but now check
    Ipvpn and data flow check
    Connection has ben made check

  • Old (but unresolved) connect issues deleted

    Some old connect issues have been deleted without being resolved, e.g:
    https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/677738/ifstream-putback-behavior-is-incorrect
    https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/684997/include-auto-completion-path-is-incorrect
    https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/708559/internal-compiler-error-with-default-arguments
    have all been deleted but were not resolved, should I resubmit these issues or simply give up on submitting visual studio bug reports?

    "have all been deleted but were not resolved, should I resubmit these issues or simply give up on submitting visual studio bug reports?"
    Whether you should resubmit depends (IMHO) on whether the issues are still relevant. How old are the reports? What version(s) of VS are involved?
    In your shoes, if the issues are relevant, I'd submit a question on Connect regarding the deleted reports, and ask why.
    Please don't give up on reporting bugs via Connect. You know as well as I do that the vast majority, when validated, are being attended to by the dev team.

  • Frequent but random DNS issues

    I have been experiencing frequent but random DNS issues that have been affecting my access to websites and above all email. The problem is that it comes and goes without any intervention on my part but when it becomes really bad I have found that changing the DNS server in the network settings tends to fix things immediately for a while until it starts up again a day or two later. Obviously this shouldn't be necessary and it's been happening now for several weeks. 
    At first I had problems with BT DNS and after hitting my head against a brick wall for a week or so was amazed that the problem cleared up as soon as I put in the Google DNS. Then yesterday I was having major hassles and I remembered the DNS trick so I tried Open DNS with no improvement but tried BT again and everything was immediately OK. Most of the time I've just been struggling along and waiting for things to improve. 
    In an effort to try and troubleshoot the email issues I contacted my webhost and ran a trace route which show *** hops immediately after listing the BT HomeHub rather than a clear path of progression that my webhost says may be related to an ICMP protocol block in the router but I'm still seeing this even if I temporarily disable the firewall on my homehub and computer. 
    I have spoken with various BT support staff and they clearly just don't understand the issues. I am sick of resetting the router and calling BT just to go through the same steps. On one call the support guy felt it was likely to be an issue with my router so I asked about them sending me a replacement and they won't do it.
    After two years of headaches with non functioning YouView I've just about had it with BT. Does anybody have any suggestions how to fix these problems? 

    This is what a traceroute looks like when trying to connect to BT.com
    Traceroute has started…
    traceroute to www.bt.com (193.113.9.162), 64 hops max, 72 byte packets
     1  bthomehub.home (192.168.1.254)  1.501 ms  1.049 ms  0.934 ms
     2  * * *
     3  * * *
     4  217.41.217.13 (217.41.217.13)  21.465 ms  19.531 ms  20.967 ms
     5  host109-159-245-2.range109-159.btcentralplus.com (109.159.245.2)  22.287 ms  22.830 ms  22.663 ms
     6  31.55.164.177 (31.55.164.177)  20.768 ms  20.926 ms  20.712 ms
     7  31.55.164.107 (31.55.164.107)  21.666 ms  21.210 ms  21.068 ms
     8  109.159.248.93 (109.159.248.93)  22.297 ms  22.197 ms  21.800 ms
     9  109.159.248.180 (109.159.248.180)  28.189 ms
        109.159.252.202 (109.159.252.202)  26.659 ms
        core1-te0-10-0-7.ilford.ukcore.bt.net (109.159.248.144)  26.981 ms
    10  core1-pos1-0.birmingham.ukcore.bt.net (62.172.103.81)  31.349 ms  31.834 ms
        core2-pos1-1.birmingham.ukcore.bt.net (62.172.103.93)  29.987 ms
    11  iar1-gig5-4.birmingham.ukcore.bt.net (62.6.196.94)  48.045 ms
        iar1-gig5-5.birmingham.ukcore.bt.net (62.6.196.98)  33.903 ms
        iar1-gig5-4.birmingham.ukcore.bt.net (62.6.196.94)  30.034 ms
    12  62.172.57.218 (62.172.57.218)  31.126 ms  28.949 ms  29.447 ms
    13  * * *
    14  * * *
    15  * * *
    16  * * *
    17  * * *
    18  * * *
    19  * * *
    20  * * *
    21  * * *
    22  * * *
    23  * * *
    24  * * *
    25  * * *
    26  * * *
    27  * * *
    28  * * *
    29  * * *
    30  * * *
    31  * * *
    32  * * *
    33  * * *
    34  * * *
    35  * * *
    36  * * *
    37  * * *
    38  * * *
    39  * * *
    40  * * *
    41  * * *
    42  * * *
    43  * * *
    44  * * *
    45  * * *
    46  * * *
    47  * * *
    48  * * *
    49  * * *
    50  * * *
    51  * * *
    52  * * *
    53  * * *
    54  * * *
    55  * * *
    56  * * *
    57  * * *
    58  * * *
    59  * * *
    60  * * *
    61  * * *
    62  * * *
    63  * * *
    64  * * *

  • DNS in DHCP Pool (Internal DNS issue)

    I know that we can setup multiple DNS server under DHCP pool. But I like to make sure the order.
    I have multiple branch offices.
    Let us say that Branch 1 office has a router with 10.30.1.1 as default gateway.
    Our internal DNS is 10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2 as Pri and Sec.
    My order of DNS server is like below.
    1. gateway
    2. internal DNS
    3. public DNS provided by ISP
    I saw couple of issues that when I put internal DNS first. Particular situation is when IPsec is not working, users could not access internet through domain name because they had internal DNS which is not reachable.
    But, when gateway is first order, I am not sure whether user are able to access internal website because gateway DNS doesn't have internal DNS records.
    So, my question is that. what should be the best order for DNS setup under DHCP among default gateway, internal DNS and public DNS?  Our current setup doesn't have even gateway address, it only has internal DNS addresses only.      
    ip dhcp pool ccp-pool1
    network 10.30.1.0 255.255.255.0
    domain-name test.org
    default-router 10.30.1.1
    netbios-name-server 10.30.1.1
    dns-server  10.30.1.1 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 24.25.5.60

    Thank you, Richard.
    You are right. when I setup router IP for DNS server in DHCP pool. it did not work.
    Let me ask regarding external DNS forwarding.
      I like to know the process of exteranl DNS.
    User --> Internal website --> OK with internal DNS
    User --> External website --> Internal DNS forwarding to External DNS
    We have our own external DNS (ns), in this case, if external DNS (ns) is down, every branch users are not able to resolve any external IP because internal DNS can't get reply from external DNS?
    2nd question)
    IPsec is split-tunneled, but in this case, every DNS request goes internal DNS which is located in HQ and goes back through IPsec? Usually Split tunnel doesn't go internet traffic through IPsec but internet directly.
    3rd Question)
    what is for ip name-server x.x.x.x   when I setup ip name-server 8.8.8.8 and I tried to ping 8.8.8.8 from router, it didn't work. Am i missing something?
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/230711
    Thanks for your time and knowledge.

  • OPEN DNS HAS SOLVED MY SAFARI 5 ISSUES

    Thought previously that the disk permissions would completely resolve the issue but was still experiencing some problems that others have described. Saw another post on open dns so googled it and found this article: http://appletoolbox.com/2010/06/safari-5-0-hangs-while-loading-pages-fix/
    Plugged in the numbers for the open dns and all seems to be fine in the Safari 5 universe now!

    No, that link doesn't work but the information is correct!
    Adding DNS codes to your Network Preferences, should give good results in terms of speed-up as well as added security:
    If you are using a single computer: Open System Preferences/Network. Double click on your connection type, or select it in the drop-down menu, and in the box marked 'DNS Servers' add the following two numbers:
    208.67.222.222
    208.67.220.220
    (You can also enter them if you click on Advanced and then DNS)
    Sometimes reversing the order of the DNS numbers can be beneficial in cases where there is a long delay before web pages start to load, and then suddenly load at normal speed:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2296
    If your computer is part of a network: please refer to this page: http://www.opendns.com/start/bestpractices/#yournetwork and follow the advice given.
    (An explanation of why using Open DNS is both safe and a good idea can be read here: http://www.labnol.org/internet/tools/opendsn-what-is-opendns-why-required-2/2587 /
    Open DNS also provides an anti-phishing feature: http://www.opendns.com/solutions/homenetwork/anti-phishing/ )
    Wikipedia also has an interesting article about Open DNS:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDNS

  • 2008 Enterprise R2 : Image restore issue on domain contoller : LDP, DNS, NETLOGIN failed : failed test DNS

    Dear All,
    I need your help in order to resolve issue i got. I have domain controller, and additional domain controller in production and both were working fine untill i restore image on 'Domain Controller' and after that i was not able to browse 'AD'. I checked and
    came to know that NETLOGIN service was PAUSED. i fixed that issue but when i went to Additional Domain, that machine was not able to find Dmain. i realise that DNS/LDAP is not working. I run the command "DCDIAG /TEST:DNS" just to check the connetivy,
    and found DNS connectivity sissue on Main Domain controller. Please help me with the issue. 
    Window Server 2008
    Domain Main :   GTMAIN : 192.168.0.1
    Additional Domain Controller :   GTMAIN2 : 192.168.0.2
    Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601]
    Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.
    C:\Users\Administrator> DCDIAG /TEST:DNS
    Directory Server Diagnosis
    Performing initial setup:
       Trying to find home server...
       Home Server = GTMain
       * Identified AD Forest.
       Done gathering initial info.
    Doing initial required tests
       Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\GTMAIN
          Starting test: Connectivity
             Although the Guid DNS name
             (0d76309b-aebd-4f7e-b024-d0c3f380c1b1._msdcs.goldteam.co.uk) resolved
             to the IP address (87.82.208.116), which could not be pinged, the
             server name (GTMain.goldteam.co.uk) resolved to the IP address
             (fe80::5efe:192.168.1.1%12) and could be pinged.  Check that the IP
             address is registered correctly with the DNS server.
             Got error while checking LDAP and RPC connectivity. Please check your
             firewall settings.
             ......................... GTMAIN failed test Connectivity
    Doing primary tests
       Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\GTMAIN
          Starting test: DNS
             DNS Tests are running and not hung. Please wait a few minutes...
             ......................... GTMAIN passed test DNS
       Running partition tests on : ForestDnsZones
       Running partition tests on : DomainDnsZones
       Running partition tests on : Schema
       Running partition tests on : Configuration
       Running partition tests on : goldteam
       Running enterprise tests on : goldteam.co.uk
          Starting test: DNS
             Test results for domain controllers:
                DC: GTMain.goldteam.co.uk
                Domain: goldteam.co.uk
                   TEST: Basic (Basc)
                      Error: No LDAP connectivity
                      Warning: adapter
                      [00000014] Broadcom BCM5708C NetXtreme II GigE (NDIS VBD Clien
    t)
                      has invalid DNS server: 192.168.0.100 (<name unavailable>)
                      Warning: adapter
                      [00000014] Broadcom BCM5708C NetXtreme II GigE (NDIS VBD Clien
    t)
                      has invalid DNS server: 212.135.1.36 (<name unavailable>)
                      Error: all DNS servers are invalid
                      No host records (A or AAAA) were found for this DC
                   TEST: Dynamic update (Dyn)
                      Warning: Failed to add the test record dcdiag-test-record in z
    one goldteam.co.uk
                TEST: Records registration (RReg)
                   Error: Record registrations cannot be found for all the network
                   adapters
             Summary of test results for DNS servers used by the above domain
             controllers:
                DNS server: 192.168.0.100 (<name unavailable>)
                   2 test failure on this DNS server
                   PTR record query for the 1.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa. failed on the DN
    S server 192.168.0.100               Name resolution is not functional. _ldap._t
    cp.goldteam.co.uk. failed on the DNS server 192.168.0.100
                DNS server: 212.135.1.36 (<name unavailable>)
                   2 test failure on this DNS server
                   Name resolution is not functional. _ldap._tcp.goldteam.co.uk. fai
    led on the DNS server 212.135.1.36
             Summary of DNS test results:
                                                Auth Basc Forw Del  Dyn  RReg Ext
                Domain: goldteam.co.uk
                   GTMain                       PASS FAIL PASS PASS WARN FAIL n/a
             ......................... goldteam.co.uk failed test DNS
    C:\Users\Administrator>

    Thanks for the response.
    DC1 :Main Domain Contoller: Issue @ momemnt because of restore. seems to me DNS is working/responoding
    along wiht RPC but i can see that DNS service is started? 
    DC2 :Additional Domain Contoller: Healthy but i am not able to login on AD on that server becuase of
    below mentioned issue
    Naming information cannot be located becuase: the target principle name is incorrect
    I am confused that if i downgrade the DC1,
    how about if i am not able to recove AD?
    which process should i adopt?
    Thanks

  • WiFi problem - No internet / DNS Not working

    Hi,
    I installed 64bit Windows 7 on my T500, and I'm having problems when connecting to wireless networks.
    Everything works fine with wired networks, but when I connect to a wireless network (any wireless network) DNS isnt working.
    I can ping and connect to websites using IP, but it refuses to resolve domain names. I have verified that the correct DNS servers are beeing used.
    I have installed all the drivers supplied by Lenovos system update + some beta drivers from http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/WIN7-BE​TA.html, but at this time I'm no longer sure what drivers are beta and whats release.
    Software & drivers installed:
    Access Connections version 5.42 build 6JC725WW
    Realtek 11b/g/m Wireless LAN Mini-PCI Express Adapter II (driver version 2007.2.1103.2009)
    Microsoft Virtual WiFi Miniport Adapter (driver version 6.1.7600.16385
    Anyone know what this could be?
    Thanks,
    Trygve
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I have had this happen now on three seperate Lenovo laptops. They are the 4446-25U model. This is the THIRD time that this exact same problem has manifested in this model of laptop. I am in a corporate environment and all systems are joined to the domain.
    All are running the XP Pro downgrade. All will ping both internal and external IP addresses, but will not resolve the domain name (neither internal or external). All were working fine, then suddenly began with this issue that I have so far been unable to resolve. I cannot see that any software has been installed to create a Layered Service Provider issue which seems to be the only thing that matches symptoms with what I am seeing according to MS. Previously when the the first laptop did this about 3 mos ago, I restored it using the Vista restore discs, and had to forego the XP Pro downgrade. I didn't have time to tinker with it, so I just restored it with Vista and went on. I have now seen two more inside of a week with exactly the same issue. DNS does not work. DNS services have been stopped and re-started, DNS has been both statically assigned, as well as handled by DHCP, new user account created, all unneccesary software removed, and several other seemingly un-related things changed around to see if anything would work, and I cannot get DNS to resolve names.
    If anyone has seen this issue please post here. I think it's odd that this has happened now three times on three seperate laptops of the same model. I've seen screwy DNS problems before, but I think I can remember one or maybe two times in my career that DNS just refused to work for no rhyme or reason, and now I've seen two in a week!!

  • Reverse DNS not working

    Noticed today that reverse DNS is no longer working for our (10) VMs. It was yesterday and had been for several weeks.
    I removed and re-added one of them. Waited for over an hour and still not resolving.
    PS C:\Windows\system32> Get-AzureService "emvpodeast2"
    ServiceName             : EMVPodEast2
    Url                     : https://management.core.windows.net/xxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxx/services/hostedservices/EMVPodEast2
    Label                   : EMVPodEast2
    Description             : emvpodeast2 with Reverse DNS
    Location                : East US
    AffinityGroup           :
    Status                  : Created
    ExtendedProperties      : {[ResourceGroup, EMVPodEast2], [ResourceLocation, East US]}
    DateModified            : 12/23/2014 10:32:34 AM
    DateCreated             : 9/2/2014 7:44:55 PM
    ReverseDnsFqdn          : fathersonholyghosttown.com.
    WebWorkerRoleSizes      : {}
    VirtualMachineRoleSizes : {}
    OperationDescription    : Get-AzureService
    OperationId             : xxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxx
    OperationStatus         : Succeeded
    PTR Check:
    http://mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=ptr%3a191.238.18.70&run=toolpage

    I'm having the exact same issue here.
    There were no IP changes. Reverse DNS was working until it wasn't anymore. We noticed it on the 22nd December when about 400 e-mails were refused from our newsletter because there was no reverse DNS.
    Tried reconfiguring like SIRob45 but to no avail.
    PS C:\> Get-AzureService "assistimo"
    ServiceName             : assistimo
    Url                     :
    https://management.core.windows.net/cac66cff-7d19-41a7-a012-e2197e145d36/services/hostedservi
                              ces/assistimo
    Label                   : assistimo
    Description             : S4 reverse DNS
    Location                : North Europe
    AffinityGroup           :
    Status                  : Created
    ExtendedProperties      : {[ResourceGroup, assistimo], [ResourceLocation, North Europe]}
    DateModified            : 24/12/2014 17:33:26
    DateCreated             : 14/11/2014 13:50:26
    ReverseDnsFqdn          : s4.assistimo.pt.
    WebWorkerRoleSizes      : {}
    VirtualMachineRoleSizes : {}
    OperationDescription    : Get-AzureService
    OperationId             : 670e5f9b-206d-5b41-a3c7-f5acf5f89fcd
    OperationStatus         : Succeeded
    Results from
    http://mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=ptr%3a191.235.218.152&run=toolpage:
    ptr:191.235.218.152
    No ptr Records exist
    History results:
    Type
    IP Address
    Domain Name
    TTL
    PTR
    191.235.218.152
    assistimo.cloudapp.net
    1 min
    smtp diag
    blacklist
    port scan
    subnet tool
    Reported by PRD2.AZUREDNS-CLOUD.NET on 12/1/2014 at 11:15:54 AM (UTC -6),
    just for you.  (History)  Transcript
    Session Transcript:
    MXTB-PWS3v2 468ms
      0  f.in-addr-servers.arpa  193.0.9.1  NON-AUTH  109 ms  Received 8 Referrals , rcode=NO_ERROR    NS tinnie.arin.net,NS ns-lacnic.nic.mx,NS ns3.afrinic.net,NS ns.lacnic.net,NS
    sec1.authdns.ripe.net,NS sec3.apnic.net,NS a.arpa.dns.br,NS ns2.lacnic.net,  
      1  tinnie.arin.net  199.212.0.53  NON-AUTH  31 ms  Received 5 Referrals , rcode=NO_ERROR    NS PRD1.AZUREDNS-CLOUD.NET,NS PRD5.AZUREDNS-CLOUD.NET,NS PRD3.AZUREDNS-CLOUD.NET,NS
    PRD4.AZUREDNS-CLOUD.NET,NS PRD2.AZUREDNS-CLOUD.NET,  
      2  PRD2.AZUREDNS-CLOUD.NET  65.55.117.43  AUTH  46 ms  Received 1 Answers , rcode=NO_ERROR    PTR assistimo.cloudapp.net,  
    We have no support contract and cannot submit a support request as suggested.
    Thank you in advance.
    Carlos R. Calado

  • DirectAccess on Server 2012 R2 with Single NIC behind NAT on IPv4 only Corporate Network Results in "DNS Not Working Properly"

    I hit this problem at a customer site and can re-produce it in a simple lab.  Lab environment: servers:
    1x Server 2012 R2 DC and DNS server - DC1 - 10.0.0.1
    1x Server 2012 R2 DirectAccess (DA) server - DA1 - 10.0.0.100
    Servers are running "Update" (KB2919355) and following DA hotfixes:
    KB2929930
    KB2966087
    I configured DA (via advanced wizard) as follows:
    DA and remote access
    AD group
    directaccess-webprobehost DNA (A) record pointing to 10.0.0.100
    behind an edge device (with a single network adapter)
    SSL certificate from enterprise root CA issued to directaccess.contoso.com
    NLS on remote server using https://nls.corp.contoso.com
    DNS: corp.contoso.com = 10.0.0.1; nls.corp.contoso.com = ""
    DNS suffix search list = corp.contoso.com
    The DNS server validates successfully in the configuration UI.
    With this configuration, I get a static IPv6 address of fd79:7a37:cbd9:3333::1/128 assigned to the NIC
    The operations status is all green apart from DNS which displays the following error:
    "DNS: Not Working Properly"
    Error:
    None of the enterprise DNS servers fd79:7a37:cbd9:7777::a00:1 used by DirectAccess clients for name resolution are responding. This might affect DirectAccess client connectivity to corporate resources.
    Causes:
    Enterprise DNS servers fd79:7a37:cbd9:7777::a00:1 are not responding.
    I can, however ping fd79:7a37:cbd9:7777::a00:1 (which is the DNS64 translation of 10.0.0.1)
    I would like to know what checks are failing as there are no failures in Event Viewer.
    I have come across forums where people have the same issue and fix it by specifying the local IP (in this case 10.0.0.100) as the DNS server, however Richard Hicks has confirmed with me that the DNS server should be set to the DNS server, not the DA server's
    IP.

    Thanks for the post Matt,
    ISATAP has been disabled on my DA server, so the results of a "ROUTE PRINT -6" command yields:
    ===========================================================================
    Interface List
     12...00 15 5d 01 03 64 ......Microsoft Hyper-V Network Adapter
      1...........................Software Loopback Interface 1
     14...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 IPHTTPSInterface
    ===========================================================================
    IPv6 Route Table
    ===========================================================================
    Active Routes:
     If Metric Network Destination                           Gateway
      1    306 ::1/128                                               On-link
     12    261 fd79:7a37:cbd9::/48                         On-link
     14    306 fd79:7a37:cbd9:1000::/64                On-link
     14    306 fd79:7a37:cbd9:1000::/128              On-link
     14    306 fd79:7a37:cbd9:1000::1/128            On-link
     14    306 fd79:7a37:cbd9:1000::2/128            On-link
     14    306 fd79:7a37:cbd9:1000:814c:28be:46b5:52c1/128     On-link
     12    261 fd79:7a37:cbd9:3333::1/128            On-link
     12    261 fd79:7a37:cbd9:7777::/96                On-link
     12    261 fe80::/64                                           On-link
     14    306 fe80::/64                                           On-link
     12    261 fe80::20c0:e848:d304:9f01/128       On-link
     14    306 fe80::814c:28be:46b5:52c1/128      On-link
      1    306 ff00::/8                                               On-link
     12    261 ff00::/8                                              On-link
     14    306 ff00::/8                                             On-link
    ===========================================================================
    Persistent Routes:
     If Metric Network Destination                            Gateway
      0 4294967295 fd79:7a37:cbd9:1000::/64       On-link
      0 4294967295 fd79:7a37:cbd9::/48                On-link
      0 4294967295 fd79:7a37:cbd9:7777::/96       On-link
    ===========================================================================

  • Quantum Gateway Router - Local DNS not working

    I just installed the Quantum Gateway Router, and I can't seem to get local DNS (i.e. user defined DNS entries) to work correctly.   I'm able to make user-defined entries under Advanced->DNS Server, but the when I attempt to ping the entries, from any machine on my LAN/WLAN, the entries are not resolved.   Has anyone else run into this problem?
    Thanks in advance!
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    That is correct.  that would be the address for the dns resolver that is handed out for dhcp connections.
    You may want to check that your router is actually getting dns server addresses for use with it's dhcp connection from the wan.
    Log into the router
    select My Network
    Select Network Connections
    select Network (home/office)
    Halfway down the page see the dns server line
    if it says no dns server then it should default to the dns servers provided the wan connection.
    you can override the values here by
    selecting the drop down value use the following dns servers
    then you can 2 values in the fields that appear - typically opendns or google servers.
    To see the dns servers that came with the wan dhcp connection
    select My Network
    Select Network Connections
    Select broadband connection
    halfway down the page are the dns values 
    These can be over ridden too by
    Selecting settings and then selecting the 

  • DNS not working properly

    Hello,
    Since a couple of days I got DNS problems. (DNS not working properly). This started happening after a Windows update. I tried to deinstall all of them and see if that helped but it did not. 
    I'm quite inexperienced with this.
    Hope someone can help out.  
    Regards,

    Hello,
    is that in a domain or workgroup? Single machine only?
    Please post an unedited ipconfig /all from the problem machine and also, if domain, from the DC/DNS server.
    Best regards
    Meinolf Weber
    MVP, MCP, MCTS
    Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
    My Blog: http://blogs.msmvps.com/MWeber
    Disclaimer: This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.
    Twitter:  

  • CSS: How does DNS Scripted Keepalive (ap-kal-dns) work?

    Hello everyone,
    I have a question about how does DNS Scripted Keepalive (ap-kal-dns) work on CSS 11503.
    According to the "Using the CSS Scripting Language",
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/css11500series/v7.50/configuration/administration/guide/Scripts.html
    it says
    Since we just want to see if the DNS server is alive we will send a simple DNS Query.  This query is hard coded in hexadecimal and sent raw to the DNS server.
    and
    Receive some unexplained response. We don't care what it is because an unstable DNS server or a non-existent one would probably not send ! us any data back at all.
    but it also says
    Failure Upon: 1. Not resolving the host's IP from the domain name
    And according to the "How to Configure the CSS to Load Balance DNS Servers and Use the DNS Scripted Keepalives",
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/contnetw/ps789/products_configuration_example09186a00801d015a.shtml
    it says
    The script is hard-coded to resolve www.cisco.com.  It does not matter if the DNS server can resolve this address or not, as long as a DNS response comes back that the service is alive. This keepalive is only testing if a DNS server can respond to a query, not if it can resolve a specific name. The script queries from the CSS to DNS internal servers keep track of the availability of the DNS servers.
    but it also says
    Access to Internet Domain Name System Root Servers is required for successful implementation of DNS scripted keepalives.
    So I am confused whether DNS server has to resolve the host's IP address correctly for DNS query received from CSS or just needs to reply any response but not need to resolve it.
    I would like to recap about my question.
    Q1: Does DNS Scripted Keepalive (ap-kal-dns) send DNS query with cisco.com as DNS name by default?
    Q2: Does DNS server has to resolve IP address of  cisco.com or just need to respond for DNS query with any response but not need to resolve IP address of cisco.com?
    I understand I should get capture data and see how DNS scripted keepalive works, but I can not prepare lab environment to do it at the present.
    Your information would be appreciated.
    Best regards,
    Shinichi

    yes the query is for www.cisco.com and the script expect a reponse that contains the word cisco.
    Gilles.

Maybe you are looking for