Do not consider the stock onhand during SNP.

Hi APO specialists.
I'd like to run SNP plan that do not consider the stock onhand.
Material A is purchase item. and the forecast of material A has 400 qty.
and stock onhand is 200 qty.
But I want to make the purchase request as 400 qty.
How to ?
Anyone who has the solution can reply this question.
Thank you all.

Hi,
Try following in separate planning book by copying standard planning book.
In a macro for stock balance change the step for calculation of stock on hand projected. In this step remove the function of INITIAL_STOCK.
Regards,
Vaibhav
Edited by: Vaibhav Birwadkar on May 26, 2008 7:20 AM

Similar Messages

MTO Strategy consider the stock in hand

Dear Experts,
AM new in MRP Field, pls advise me about pure MTO Strategy which consider stock in hand. MRP run should consider the available stock for net requirement calculation. I tried with strategy 20,but it is not consider the stock.Pls advise,
Regards,
Vijesh

Vijesh,
MTO by definition will only consider Sales order stock. This is the main planning difference between MTO and MTS. Thus, if you have generic stock on hand (not sales order specific) it is supposed to be excluded from MRP planning.
If you wish for MTO planning to consider generic stock, you have to first convert the stock to Sales Order specific stock (Special stock type 'E') using a Material Movement transaction. Or, you can stop using MTO and use an MTS strategy, such as 40.
For more info about MTO planning see http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_06/helpdata/EN/f4/7d2ed844af11d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Best Regards,
DB49

The system is not considering the free stock in planning strategy grp - 25

Dear Frndz,
The system is not considering the free stock of child items available in the system.For the parent item, I have maintained a planning srategy of 25 (Make to order variant config).My client would like the system to consider the free stock available for child items.pls help me...
Regards,
Srini

Dear,
Strategy 25 will not consider the existing stock.
What you enter in MRP4 view ind/collective rquirement is applicable only for dependent requirement.
Also refer this thread?
Re: Strategy group 20
Run MRP in MD50 and then MD02 with palnning mode 3 deleted and recreated and check your result.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Replenishment upto max. stock level during SNP heuristics run.

Hi Experts,
As per the requirement from client, we need to configure the setting of replenishment upto max. stock level during SNP heuristics run.
I am using below settings in R/3 for achieving the expected results.
(R/3 ) MRP1 u2013
Lot size                       HB               Replenish to maximum stock level
Maximum stock level      20,000
(APO) Targ.Stk Lvl Methd   5 u2013 in APO u2013 product master -   lot size tab.
Still, after heuristics run, the requisitions are getting created equals to forecast value. It should get generated as max. stock level maintained.
Could anyone share their experience regarding this? Am I missing some additional setting?
Inputs are highly appreciated!
rgds/Jay

Dear Jayprakash ,
If the requirement is that you have to replenish upto a certain stock level then instead of maintaining the Max Stock level you can simply maintain
SB : Safety stock from product master
and in the Safety stock field maintain the quantity as desired ( in this case 20000 ) . This probably will solve the problem in your case . You may not require to maintain Max stock level .
Target stock level in heuristics also works fine with the following settings
make sure you maintain
Target stock level method as =5
In Maximum Stock level = maintain the quantity desired ( 20000 in your case say )
do not maintain any safety stock method keep it blank .
then location heuristics generates PR according to the the maximum stock level.
If still it is not working plz let me know what other settings you are maintaining probably we will find a way out .
Hope it helps .
Thanks
Debsankar

MRP Not considering Safety stock

Hello
We have settings as 1000 for safety stock . if the stock went below 1000 , MRP is not pulling the stock for the confirmation of the Production order. we checked the safety stock indicator in the Availability check for the Prod order confirmation . What ever the stock are available ( only unrestricted stock we want to consider for the availability check )
Any suggestion please.
Thanks
JJ

Hi,
When your stock level goes below the Safety stock, then MRP will trigger a planned order to maintain the planned order. In your availability scope of check, if you checked the safety stock, the system will allow to consume the safety stock by posting the goods issue, if the tick is not there, it will not post the goods issue, saying insufficient stock is there.
regards,
V. Suresh

FI-AP Tax Code not considering the excise duty while calcuating the VAT

Sub: A/P Tax Code not considering the excise duty while calcuating the VAT
Hi Frnds.
I have a typical problem.
Till now we are using a "W6" as a tax code, where Excise-10%, Ed Cess-2%, SEd Cess-1% and VAT-4%.
But as the Govt. rules changed I have created a new tax code "W8" by copying the W6 and modified the VAT to 5% by changing the condition record JVRD.
The new tax code is not calculating VAT part correctly. It is taxing into consideration Invoice Base value, Ed Cess & SEd Cess (Omiting the Excise Duty).
I have checked my Tax Procedure, there everything is fine. Even my old tax code "W6" is working correctly.
Let me know where the error lies.
Here is the scenario
00. Tax code                       -   W6   -   W8   - Current Staus of W8
01. Invoice Base               - 355181 - 351798 - 353324 (by SAP Document Simulation View)
02. Excise @ 10% on 01.        - 35518 - 35180 - 35332
03. Ed Cess @ 2% on 01.        -    710 -    704 -    707
04. SEd Cess @ 1% on 01.       -    355 -    352 -    353
05. VAT @ 4% on (010203+04) - 15671 -   0     - 0
05.    VAT @ 5% on (010203+04) -    0    - 19401 - 0
05.     VAT @ 5% on (010304)     -   0     -    0    - 17719
INVOICE TOTAL VALUE            - 407435 - 407435 - 407435
Pls. let me know how to come over the issue.
By the way I am using the above tax code at FB60 transaction code.
Regards
Krishna
Edited by: Gopi Krishna Gutti on Oct 17, 2011 10:18 AM

Hi Vivek
Acutually we planned to implement SAP - FI & MM Modules only, and all the configuration is done in the system, but at the final stage our management is not satisfied with MM area, so finally we have gone live with only FI Moudle.
By the way thankyou for the reply. I have maintained 100% in JMX1 for the new tax code and it is working fine.
I will give you full points.
Once again thanks a lot.
Regards
Krishna

BAPI_INSPLOT_SETUSAGEDECISION is not posting the Stock

BAPI_INSPLOT_SETUSAGEDECISION is not posting the stock in usage decision. Is there any field needs to be set in BAPI or any seperate function module to set this?
Thanks in Advance.

Automatic Usage Decision Bapi
Regarding problem with QA11 - Force inspection Completion
Please give me reward points...

Difference between 2 timestamp,not considering the weekends (SATURDAY,SUN)

I use an Oracle XE and I have a table which has the following Timestamp columns
A_Date Timestamp
R_Date Timestamp
Now in this query i need to be able to exclude the SAT/SUN and show the difference between these 2 timestamp dates.
Could any one help on this?
I use this query to find out the difference between the 2 dates (R_DATE - A_DATE),showing the DAYS:HOURS:MIN:SECS
TRUNC (TO_NUMBER (SUBSTR ((R_DATE - A_DATE),
1,
INSTR (R_DATE - A_DATE, ' ')
|| ':'
|| SUBSTR ((R_DATE - A_DATE),
INSTR ((R_DATE - A_DATE), ' ') + 1,
2
|| ':'
|| SUBSTR ((R_DATE - A_DATE),
INSTR ((R_DATE - A_DATE), ' ') + 4,
2
|| ':'
|| SUBSTR ((R_DATE - A_DATE),
INSTR ((R_DATE - A_DATE), ' ') + 7,
2
) "TTR"
Example : A_DATE := '11-Dec-2009 19:33:30 PM' ---> Friday
R_DATE := '14-Dec-2009 07:32:38 AM' ---> Monday
should not consider the SAT/SUN that comes between them.
Thanks
GAG

SQL> create table t as (
2 select to_timestamp('11-dec-2009 07:33:30 PM') rdate
3 ,      to_timestamp('14-dec-2009 07:32:38 AM') adate
4 from   dual
5 );
Table created.
SQL> select rdate
2 ,      adate
3         /* do some final formatting */
4 ,      to_number(substr(diff_incl_weekend, 1, instr( diff_incl_weekend, chr(32))))
5         ||':'||
6         substr(diff_incl_weekend, instr( diff_incl_weekend, chr(32))+1, 8) diff_incl_weekend
7 ,      to_number(substr(diff_excl_weekend, 1, instr( diff_excl_weekend, chr(32))))
8         ||':'||
9         substr(diff_incl_weekend, instr( diff_excl_weekend, chr(32))+1, 8) diff_excl_weekend
10 from ( /* substract intervals */
11         select to_char(rdate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM') rdate
12         ,      to_char(adate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM') adate
13         ,      trim('+'
14                from
15                numtodsinterval((to_date(to_char(adate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'), 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM')
16                                 -
17                                 to_date(to_char(rdate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'), 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM')
18                                )
19                               , 'day')
20                    ) diff_incl_weekend
21         ,      trim('+'
22                from
23                numtodsinterval((to_date(to_char(adate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'), 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM')
24                                 -
25                                 to_date(to_char(rdate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'), 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM')
26                                 -
27                                 nof_satsuns.total
28                                )
29                               , 'day')
30                    ) diff_excl_weekend
31         from   t
32         ,      /* calculate nof sats and suns*/
33              ( select count(dy) total
34                from ( select to_char(rdate+level-1, 'dy') dy
35                       from   t
36                       where to_char(rdate+level-1, 'dy', 'nls_date_language=american') in ('sat','sun')
37                       connect by level <= trunc(to_date(to_char(adate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'), 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'))
38                                           -
39                                           trunc(to_date(to_char(rdate, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'), 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss AM'))+1
40                     )
41              ) nof_satsuns
42      );
RDATE                   ADATE                   DIFF_INCL_WEEKEND                                 DIFF_EXCL_WEEKEND
11-dec-2009 07:33:30 PM 14-dec-2009 07:32:38 AM 2:11:59:08                                        0:11:59:08

TLB is not considering the Pull-in Horizon

Hello All,
When I am running the TLB interactively, I notice the the Pull-in Horizon is not being considered. TLB builds the
load taking into consideration the Deployment orders valid for the TLB run horizon only and ignores the pull-in
horizon during which there are valid deployment orders.
In doing so the minimum value that I have maintained for the Floorspot parameter is being ignored. I am using the three
parameters of VOLUME, WEIGHT AND FLOORSPOT with the following min and max values.
VOLUME >= 0, <= 100
WEIGHT >= 0, <= 40
FLOORSPOT >= 33, <= 34
I have checked that TLB is not hitting the Maximum limits by taking the Pull-in horzion in consideration. I have a Rule
Relationship of "1" - "OR" for lower limits and "AND" for the higher limits. Also, I have defined a TLB Basic Settings
profile and am letting the system use the default values.
Is there something that I need to change (in TLB profile, TLB Basic settings etc.) to have the system consider the Pull-in
Horzion for the load building.
Thanks,
Ratnam

HI Ratnam
the system will use pull in horizon only when it tries to upsize a shipping to form a truck load.
For the same purpose i asked you to maintain the flag of upsize to maximum.
Even if you are not doing that the way you have defined your TLB profile if stocks are available looks like it will convert all the deployment into TLB since u have only a higher limit restriction and the lower parameters are connected by or relationship.
Upsizing is always performed for remaining deployed quantities.
Looking at the rule i think you want the TLB to be of 33 or 34 pallets whose vol and wt should lie in the range defined.
You might be getting an error because when the system is reaching 33 or 34 pallets it might be going over the weight or volume maximum limit.
- Regards
Virender

Ways to consider the stocks provided to vendor on the MRP output

Hi Gurus,
I have a requirement where the business want the stocks provided to vendor to be considered when running the MRP in plant.
This is a subcontracting vendor and when checking the MD04, the stocks was displayed as special stocks. Is there any way that we can consider subcrontract stocks for MRP?
I have checked already the MRP areas, but I since we have a lot of existing plants in our system. I intend to not use the MRP area as it might cause issues to planning in our existing plants. Is there any other way?
Please let me know your thoughts on this.
Edited by: ellen gatchalian on Jan 30, 2012 1:08 PM

Hi Elen,
I believe by having BAdI- MD_SUBCONT_LOGIC implemented in your system, you can consider Subcontracting Stock in MRP.
Check with technical team to do the needful coding.
Hope it will help.
Regards,
Anup

Reflecting credit note to the stock

Dear MM Gurus,
we have a requirement as below.
We will create a PO and do GR and IR. Later after some time if the material crossed expiry date, the vendor will replace the same with free of cost. Some times if he cannot replace , he'll give credit note and our FI people will deduct the amount from his pending bills. But the same will not get reflected on the stock. system will still show the stock.
can you suggest me the best solution. Either to scrap the existing qty or process through returns PO or any other process.
Satish

Hi
If the stock is replaced
1) Perform MB1B 541 to issue the expired stock to the vendor
2) Perform MB1B 542 to recieve the New Stock
If Credit note is recieved without stock replacement
1) Perform MIRO Subsequent Debit for the expired quantity
Accounting entry would be
Vendor Account Dr
Stock Acc Cr
Regards
Sandeep

WM::system is not placing the stock another storage bin

hi friends
system is not check fill the stock to another bin ..system is placing the stock in same bin...what are the cofiguration required?
with regards
dinesh
Edited by: code acess on Jun 15, 2011 10:47 AM
Edited by: code acess on Jun 15, 2011 10:48 AM

hi SAP FC
Iam using putaway strategy is "L" ..storage is determing in the system ..every thing is working fine except placing stock to another bin
with regards
dinesh
Edited by: code acess on Jun 15, 2011 11:18 AM

Not picking the stock for the delivery

Dear friends,
Though the stock is available, it is not getting picked for the delivery.
Can you guide me what are the things I should check to solve the issue.
With regards,
Atul

Hi,
If the picking tab is grayed use T.Code LT03.( IF ware house management is activated).Here fill the ware house number and plant and mention the delivery note number also. Now use The T.Code TCode VL02N here u can see the system automatically picks the required quantity.
If the picking tab is not in gray mode mention the storage location and the plant correctly. Even though the system is not picking the quantity check the Picking location determination with rule MALA.and also check any open orders are crated for the particular material .
regards,
vas.
Message was edited by:
v.s.vas.

How to consider the stocks of other plants in MRP run

Hello All,
I have a requirement in which A finished material which it´s planning and production is on PLANT 1 and and is transfered to plant 2 (there is no production and no planning on this plant, it is used for storage only). In that case, I would like the MRP to check the stock of finished material both in plant 1 and 2 for creating planned orders .
I know this can be possible with APO . but is there any other way round we can do this like MRP area or scope of planning or some z developemenmts.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Anupam Sharma

Is there any stock at production plant? Where does the goods issue to sales occur?
If both plants can have stock and sales can occurs in both plants then it is the issue not only stock but also sales order consumption with planned independent requirement. You need to have two BADI to do so. First is the one you mentioned and the flexible PIR also (MD_PIR_FLEX_CONS).
If only storage plant has stock and sales occurs here, then you may want to explore special procurement type produce in other plant and make storage plant a planning plant. The receipt of production order at production plant will posted into storage plant directly.
If sales occurs in storage plants, and there are stock in both plant, use special procurement type transfer from others (40 as standard). When you run MRP, the system will check stock at storage plant first, then if shortage, create stock transfer request to production plant. At production plant, the stock transfer request will be your demand to offset with stock there before create planned order.
Like other comments stated previously, SAP cannot handle the multiple plants planning very well.

Cancellation of Inventory Transfer did not reverse the stocks

Hi All,
We are using SAP B1 8.82 PL 01. One of our entry in Inventory Transfer was posted wrongly by choosing wrong warehouse. So first I posted the same entry in Test database and cancelled the entry. With the cancellation the stocks were back in the "To Warehouse" from the "From Warehouse". But when I cancelled the original entry in live database the Journal entry is showing as Cancelled but the stocks are still in the "From warehouse".
Please tell me where I went wrong and how I can resolve.
Thanks,
Vineela.

Hi Vineela,
Please re-post it as a question thread.
Thanks,
Gordon

Do not consider the stock onhand during SNP.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for