Does not calculate cost

Hi Gurus,
I am calculating cost thru CK11 for a material, Hours exist in the Standard Values in Master recipe but in CK11 it is not picking those hours and hence giving cost(Over head) zero.
This material is having only One production version.
There are other material but cost is coming for them.
Would you please explain this to me..
Thanks in Advance
Atul Bhardwaj

Hi
with respect to your query please check following steps in master receipe ( CRC2)
CAN you check for costing tab that cost centre and activity type are assigned . prior to that  KP26 activity price planning should be complete.
and also you check the overhead rates maitained for plant specific in the costing sheet in use
tcode  KZZ2  For maintenace of OVERHEAD RATES and KZS2 for mainteance  of values in  costing  sheet
i hope this will clear your issue can you check once and letme know
thanks
shaik

Similar Messages

  • PR00 does not calculate / deleted for TANN in R/3 for CRM order - Free Good

    I hv done free good configuration both in R/3 and CRM.
    Main Category - TAN and Free good category - TANN
    Pricing for TANN = PR00 and ZFRE -100% discount
    When I see result in R/3 and CRM, it does populate PR00 and calculate ZFRE.
    While in Order creation in CRM it does calculated PR00 and ZFRE, on order save it replicates order in R/3 but in R/3 it does not calculate or retain PR00 & ZFRE value as a result I'm getting price log error in R/3 saying mandatory condition PR00 missing. Where as in CRM it does not impact calculate pricing.
    Note: I don't want to retain PR00 as a mandatory condition and I don't want to change my calculation. Is there any technical solution to achieve this.
    Thanks,
    Nilesh P.

    Hi Nilesh P,
    Have you set the parameter PRICINGTYPE to G in table SMOFPARSFA as per note 490932 - 'G' = Copy price components unchanged. If so then the only possibility is to debug the transfer to ERP as per note 656823 in order to determine where the condition value is initialized.
    I hope this helps.
    Kind regards,
    Vanessa.

  • Itemization does not match cost component split

    Hi,
    I need your help or could you please shed some light as to how to fix .
    A new Overhead was created, in order to add expenses to the pricing of the product. For it a variant  of different pricing to which is used currently was created, and so for maintain a historic one of the information.
    In addition, in the cost component Structure an adjustment of the configuration was carried out, this was done because the previous the cost component Structure contained 18 elements of costs, which the most of the elements were specified as fixed and variable costs, therefore the  system only permitted the addition of  2 more elements  (SAP only permits 20 elements of fixed and variable costs), nevertheless was necessary to create a total of 23 elements of costs. For it  the previous elements have to be modified and to change some elements as variable costs, specifically the elements corresponding to the accounts of materials.  using tcode OKTZ
    The addition of 5 more elements of costs, corresponding to overhead  elements, where the type 41 costs classes were configured from the plan of surcharge created. 
    After carrying out the changes and to transport them the client of production, when i execute the T-code ck13n an inconsistency in the previous pricings was generated, because  the cost component Structure was modified and the the following one Nº message was showed:  CK869 " Mat.XXX in plant XXX: itemization does not match cost component split, the report of itemization shows different values to the reports of Costed Mutilevel BOM and of Cost  Components.  Additionally to the error shown by the system, also is observed that to the Cost  Components report    a cost in the new elements of overhead  was added, even when the  calculation of previous cost did not contain the determination of overhead.
    In order to fix the error, I modified the cost component structure as it was before and the created another  cost component structure with the required changes requested by the client specifying that it should start to be current this year. However after that change the error message nºCK869 continue: Mat. XXX in plant XXX: itemization does not match cost component split. Adding to that error message, the cost of the finished product changes with reference to the calculus of the previous product after modified the configuration and that is because the cost of the semifinished product is not being taken the values of the row material, and it is appearing with cost 0 and the only value that is taking on the matter are the costs of the activities types.

    If you want the message to go away then you need to mark and releasse the estimate.  However, there is no requirement that you do this.  The message you are getting is an informational message only.  You can continue without re-costing the item.  If you do re-cost the material the new cost estimate will reflect and changes you've made to the components, so there is a good chance you will get a different value with the new estimate.  So if that's ok, go ahead and mark and release the new estimate.

  • Website page with jquery datepicker does not calculate dates while other pages without datepicker and all other browsers do their job

    I wrote two mobile pages with dreamweaver cs5.5 and jquery. Both do online calculations. Both appear and accept input. One page using jquery datepicker does not calculate. Solely in Firefox. IE9, Safari, Chrome display correct results. Debuggers show no error. Firebug seems telling me that Firefox does not get a result from datepicker function.

    Thanks. But did not help. I had done this several times before, reload, clear cache, disable extensions etc. Always used standard theme. I tried the same on two different machines, with next to last version and after having installed the latest version. In the debugger I can see that variables "zeit1" (jquery datepicker) were not filled with the datepicking results, while in all other browsers zeitX shows the current date and the app shows the results that are expected. Given that another comparable app - only without date and datepicker functions - works in Firefox I think one should explore why solely datepicker - or the function using datepicker - does not show results solely in Firefox on desktop (no mobile device with Firefox on hand) . I indeed believe that there is a mistake in my code which is detected only by Firefox (10.0.2 at the present time, with Win7 64bit - had the problem with 3.6... on another machine). Given that you could run the app with results on your machine: could it be the context of locale/culture (here: de)?
    Kind regards

  • Why update with subqueries does not have cost and cardinality?

    There is update.
    update test t1 set dummy = (select dummy from test2 t2 where t1.id = t2.id);Both tables which have actual statistics. Each has 1000 rows. And column ID have values from 1 to 1000 in each table.
    This is explain plan
    | Id  | Operation          | Name  | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | UPDATE STATEMENT   |       |  1000 | 13000 |   426   (9)| 00:00:01 |
    |   1 |  UPDATE            | TEST  |       |       |            |          |
    |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST  |  1000 | 13000 |   426   (9)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  3 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST2 |     1 |    13 |   426   (9)| 00:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       3 - filter("T2"."ID"=:B1)We can see here, that Oracle consider subquery within update as once-executed subquery.
    This is runtime plan
    | Id  | Operation          | Name  | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows |
    |   1 |  UPDATE            | TEST  |      1 |        |      0 |
    |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST  |      1 |   1000 |   1000 |
    |*  3 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST2 |   1000 |      1 |   1000 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       3 - filter("T2"."ID"=:B1)Why first plan does not have cost in step 1?
    Does Oracle always not understand that update with subqueries will performed as NL or filter? In other words that step 3 will executed many times.
    Or it is my bug (or what?)?

    793769 wrote:
    Does Oracle always not understand that update with subqueries will performed as NL or filter? In other words that step 3 will executed many times.
    Or it is my bug (or what?)?It's not possible to say whether this is a bug or a deliberate choice.
    Because of "subquery caching" (see http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2006/11/06/filter-subqueries/ ) the optimizer cannot predict how often the subquery will have to run. So possibly it shows nothing rather than showing the best or worst cases or a pure guess.
    Regards
    Jonathan Lewis

  • Sales Analysis report does not match Cost of Sales Account

    My client is running SAP B1 8.81 PL 6.  He has set all items to standard costing method.  He has discovered that the difference between the Sales Amount and the Gross Profit amount on the Sales Analysis report, which should equal the Cost of Sales for the Items, does not match the Cost of Sales G/L account on the P&L report.  If you look at a sample of rows, the above difference divided by the quantity equals the standard cost of the item.  There are no manual journal entries that affect the COS account for the posting period that is being analyzed.  I cannot see any mathmatical difference or problem with the above analysis, nor can I find the problem.  There is about an $85K difference between the reports.  The Sales Amount on the Sales Analysis report matches the revenue account on the P&L to the penny.  Has anyone ever compared these 2 reports?  Thank you for your help.
    Bill Turek

    If you right click on an Invoice and choose "Gross Profit" it will give you a setting on how you want to calculate the Gross Profit for that invoice.
    In the accounting point of view the "Base Price" should be "Item Cost" so that the Gross Profit will be (Net Selling Price - Item Cost = Gross Profit). This will give you the same Gross Profit amount between P and L and Sales Analysis Report.
    However, SAP B1 gives the user the ability to select a different base price other than the Item Cost.
    This gives the user the flexibility for the Sales Report. Example (Net Sales Price - Vendor Sales Price = Gross Profit). People do this sometimes because  the item's cost fluctuates if you use FIFO or average cost and they want a uniform cost to calculate their Gross Profit.
    In summary if the Base Price is not set to "Item Cost" then there will be difference in the Gross Profit between the P and L and Sales Analysis Report.
    See screenshot:
    -Eric Alo-
    B1 Financial Consultant

  • FOX Formula does not calculate ratio

    Dear guys,
    We are customizing the process for calculation of data which will be used for elimination of profit/loss in stock and revenue and expenses during consolidation of manufacturing companies group's financials.
    At the moment we're customizing a FOX Formula for calculation of share of revenue from (source) materials sold to other companies inside the group and used for production of other (target) materials and total revenue received for each of these source products.
    We use the following key figures and characteristics in the level:
    0CS_VERSION     Consolidation (End-Result) Version
    0CURKEY_GC     Currency Key for Group Currency
    0FISCPER3     Posting period
    0FISCVARNT     Fiscal year variant
    0FISCYEAR     Fiscal year
    0MOVE_TYPE     Movement Type
    MPZZFKOD     Source Material Consolidation Code
    PRODUCER     Company - Producer
    SL_TYPE          Sales Location Type: Export/Domestic
    TRG_COMP     Target Company
    ZZFKOD          Target Material Consolidation Code
    COGSGGC     COGS Gross GC
    SREVENGC     Revenue Statistical GC
    VS_SUPSH     VS Supplier Share
    MPZZFKOD ZZFKOD     TRG_COMP  COGSGGC    SREVENGC      VS_SUPSH
    2651     #      #           0             10.070.099     0,00000
    2651     2703      3           21.000              0                     0,00000
    2651     2704      3           19.116              0                     0,00000
    We need to calculate a ratio of COGSGGC for each ZZFKOD and total SREVENGC. (21.000/10.070.099 and 19.116/10.070.099).
    Below is a program code:
    DATA SUM_KF TYPE F.
    DATA SHARE  TYPE F.
    DATA FLAG   TYPE I.
    DATA KEYFIG TYPE F.
    DATA L_ENTRIES TYPE I.
    *DATA L_ZZFKOD TYPE  ZZFKOD.
    *L_ZZFKOD = VARV(TMCONSCD).
    *DATA L_MPZZFKOD TYPE MPZZFKOD.
    DO.
    IF FLAG > 1.
    EXIT.
    ENDIF.
    ENDDO.
    L_ENTRIES = VARC(VERSION).
    *SUM_KF = 0.
    *FOREACH L_MPZZFKOD.
    SUM_KF = SUM_KF +
    *{SREVENGC,'#','#'}.
    *ENDFOR.
    *SUM_KF = SUM_KF + {SREVENGC,'#','#'}.
    *FOREACH L_MPZZFKOD.
    SHARE = {COGSGGC,L_MPZZFKOD,'#'} / SUM_KF.
    {VS_SUPSH,L_MPZZFKOD,'#'} = SHARE.
    *ENDFOR.
    *SUM_KF = SUM_KF + {SREVENGC,'#'}.
    *FOREACH L_ZZFKOD.
    *SUM_KF = SUM_KF + {SREVENGC,L_ZZFKOD}.
    *ENDFOR.
    *DO.
    *IF FLAG > 1.
    *EXIT.
    *ENDIF.
    *ENDDO.
    *FOREACH L_ZZFKOD.
    *SHARE = {COGSGGC,L_ZZFKOD} / SUM_KF.
    *{VS_SUPSH,L_ZZFKOD} = SHARE.
    *ENDFOR.
    Could you help us to understand the reason the program does not work?
    Mila

    Mila,
    I see some issues with your logic:
    1. you are not using fiscal period at all but you declared it.  Is it in your field to be changed or just in your field for condition or package / filter?  Also version 0CS_VERSION?
    2. What is the purpose of Flag > 1?
    3. You are very confused in your looping logic...  You need to think more logically about what you want to do
    4. What is the 3rd items in your fields to be changed?  If you don't use it or change based on it in the FOX, remove it from fields to be changed.
    You want to process for each source material MPZZFKOD (I persume for each fiscal period) and within each source material MPZZFKOD, you want to loop through each target material ZZFKOD.
    Note: the items in the {} depends on the order of your to be changed characteristics
    Give this (or a similar version to this) a whirl.
    DATA SUM_KF TYPE F.
    DATA SHARE TYPE F.
    DATA L_MPZZFKOD TYPE MPZZFKOD.
    DATA L_ZZFKOD TYPE ZZFKOD.
    FOREACH L_MPZZFKOD.
      SUM_KF = {SREVENGC,L_MPZZFKOD,'#'}.
      FOREACH L_ZZFKOD.
         SHARE = {COGSGGC,L_MPZZFKOD,L_ZZFKOD} / SUM_KF.
         {VS_SUPSH,L_MPZZFKOD,L_ZZFKOD} = SHARE.
      ENDFOR.
    ENDFOR.
    You can even do without the share if you map it directly.
         {VS_SUPSH,L_MPZZFKOD,L_ZZFKOD}
                = {COGSGGC,L_MPZZFKOD,L_ZZFKOD} / SUM_KF.
    Hope this helps.  Sounds like you need to read up on some documents on FOX and/or practice with it.
    Mary

  • System does not accept Cost Element on External Activity

    Hi Experts,
    I have maintained the cost element in network profile under the activity type. When I create external activity in project builder system populates the default cost element entered in network profile BUT when I maintain Material Group in activity detailed data, system removes cost element and issues a message "Enter cost element".
    System does not accept any cost element in the field. Please guide if there is some setting that I have missed
    Thanking in advance
    Warm Regards

    Via txn OBYC also check if the VBR entry with a blank valuation class is missing
    If so get your FI/MM consultant to advise the entry details with relevant cost elements

  • [Project Pro 2013] User Custom Field w/ Formula does not calculates on Group Tasks

    This issue happens only on Project 2013. When I make a formula (using Duration, Cost, Number, etc...) on a custom field and set "Use formula" option in "Calculation for task and group summary rows",
    works fine without groups, on resume tasks. But when I Group the tasks, the group tasks values disappear.
    When I open the same file on Project 2010, it works correctly.
    Thanks in advance.

    Thank you for the effort. This problem is a bit tricky and hard to explain without images or files.
    I'll try to explain using your example:
    - I do not coded my summary tasks with the value in the "Text1" field and
    - I do not want to maintain hierarchy on groups like you show.
    1. On "No Group" mode, the summary tasks works fine. All summary tasks shows the values calculated by the formula. Summary tasks are not the problem.
    2. However, when you group the tasks by Text1, the Group Tasks (the colored ones that appear on group mode: Group: a, b and c) do not show the values calculated by the formula, even if you set to "use formula" on summary and group tasks.
    3. When you open the same file on Project 2010 (default configs), group tasks values appears (values calculated for the groups of the detail tasks: a, b, c). If your Duration1 field stays the same or disappear, change some values and refresh the field to check
    the formula is working.
    4. If you see that everything are working correctly so far, try this on your file:
    4.1. Maintain your tasks grouped by Text1.
    4.2. Add three Fields: "Duration2", "Duration3" and "Duration4".
    4.3. On every detail tasks, enter 2 days for Duration2, 3 days for Duration3.
    4.4 Set Duration2 and Duration3 to "show Average" value on the resume and group tasks. Set the Duration4 to "use formula".
    4.5. Create on Duration4 field a simple formula, like [Duration2]+[Duration3], or [Duration2]/[Duration3].
    4.6. See that the formula works fine the detail tasks (Duration4 = 5 days).
    4.7. Now the problem: The group tasks shows nothing. Duration4 should be calculated (average duration2: 2 days + avg duration3: 3 days = 5 days).
    4.8. Save the file and open on Project 2010. If the resume tasks on Duration4 continues to show nothing. Refresh the field by clicking right button on field and going to "Custom field" and pressing OK.
    See that Duration4 are calculated on Project 2010 correctly, but not on 2013 version. That is the problem
    Thanks again. I hope it helps.

  • Pie chart legend total does not calculate correctly

    Hi All
    I have a pie chart in a CR 2008 report (SP0). 
    The pie has one "On Change Of" and one "Show Value" field.
    The datasource for the report is an Oracle 10g (Rel 2) Stored Procedure (SP).
    The SP signs the value per each transaction (record), so if the txn is a reversal is will arrive in the report as a negative value
    The records that are listed in the report have the correct sign on each line, and totals in the report are correct
    So, if the first record has a value of 10,000 - these would be known as Cash txns
    and the second record has a value of -5,000 - these would be known as Cash Reversal txns
    The report total will be 5,000
    In the legend entry of the pie chart the values per series are being displayed correctly.  There is a series per Txn type (so one series represents Cash txns, the second series represents Cash Reversal txns)
    From the example above my pie shows 1 txn for Cash @ 10,000
    and 1 txn for Cash Reversal @ -5000 (it has the negaitve amount in brackets)
    But the total in the legend is 15,000
    I cannot figure out why that the legend total is not calculating correclty.
    Has anyone seen this behaviour before?
    Any help would be great thanks
    Best regards
    Patrick

    Just realised why....  The total is counting all txns, and my formula is not telling it that Reversal should be subtracted - duuhhhh!!!!

  • I have a java script calulation that works fine on a PC but when the form is on a IPad it does not calculate. Why?

    var sDate = this.getField("MDate").value;
    if(sDate=="")
    event.value="";
    else{
    var oDate = util.scand("mm/dd/yy", sDate);
    oDate.setDate(oDate.getDate() +6);
    event.value = util.printd("mm/dd/yy", oDate);

    What app is involved?
    Many apps on mobile devices cannot handle from fields. They also have very limited JavaScript support. The "uiti" objects is nol fully supported by Adobe Mobile Reader.
    http://www.adobe.com/devnet-docs/acrobatetk/tools/Mobile/Enterprise_Guide_ReaderMobile.pdf

  • Invoices with NUMBERS, help needed, the tax still on the invoice but it does not actually calculate it?

    Hello, I need help to display tax on the invoice, its numbers/ invoices,
    the tax is set to 21%
    it is as is but it does not calculate the tax indeed.
           subtotal    e495
    tax        21%    e0.00
    Total                e495
    any help?
    thank you

    Try reposting in the Numbers Forum

  • Getting Cost Center Does not exist error when executing BAPI_ACC_GL_POSTING

    Hi Champs,
    I am getting Cost Center Does not exist error when executing BAPI_ACC_GL_POSTING_CHECK.
    But when I checked for the particular Cost center, it is mapped to the same company code the program has got executed.
    Example:
    Cost center 1000/150402 does not exist on 17.11.2009.
    Cost center 1000/150402 does not exist
    Cost center 1000/150402 does not exist on 17.11.2009.
    Cost center 1000/150402 does not exist on 17.11.2009.
    Please let me know if you have any guess on this. It is very critical issue for me.
    Thanks for all your help in advance.
    With Best Regards,
    Ravi kanth Yechuri

    Use 0000150402 not 150402 .
    Rob

  • Scrolling with the mouse wheel does not always work with 4.0? Never a problem with previsous versions.

    in firefox 4.0, at times the scrolling wheel will not work. It has never been a problem with previous versions, and always works in internet explorer.

    Hello Henry,
    Thanks for the hint!
    My mouse wheel is  working, but not in flash player...strange... It is a Microsoft Comfort  Mouse and I see there is already logged bug about that: https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-5145
    Anyway besides this bug, there is an additional issue I think, that the vertical layout does not calculate properly the vertical scroll position, when certain elements are excluded from the layout. I have described this additionally in the Jira.
    Regards,
    Dinko

  • Gps does not make a fix

    Hy, I have a problem with getting a GPS fix. I have as far as I can see all the settings OK. In AGPS I do get a position on the map but not an GPS fix. Also I do see that the phone is looking for the satellites but it does not calculate a coordinate. Any Ideas how to fix this?

    Unfortunately there is no fix for that. One must be patient with the GPS app running, it comes eventually.
    However, I have noticed that some apps find a fix more quickly that others. For example, Google Maps and Garmin XT can find a fix more quickly that Ovi Maps.
    One other thing, the first fix is the longest. As you use these applications, the fix seems to happen earlier.
    mgoksoy

Maybe you are looking for