DOR Approval - SSHR
Hi,
I was able to send employee personal information updates for approval by updating the workflow attributes. But the same cannot be done for DOR functionality in SSHR. When I open the DOR function, under form tab I cannot find any process name?
Any pointers please.
KK
When you actually register the DOR, you have a parameter 'Authorisation Required'. When you set that to 'YES", the system takes it for a verification of the document. However the oproblem here is:
1. We have already registerd this DOR with that parameter 'NO'. There is no way I can override this to 'YES'. Re registering again leads to data corruption.
2. Even if you create a DOR adn register by setting that parameter to 'YES', entering a DOR from Fasthpath too goes for verification. This is not required as fasthpath is usally accessed by HR alone.
I want the DOR to go for supervisor approval only when entered in SSHR...so still wondering!!!
KK
Similar Messages
-
How to make manager approve more than one request in one time in SSHR
Dear All,
Anyone has an idea on how to make manager approver more than one request in one time in SSHR??
for example, manager is having 20 requests to approve on Change Pay Function, he don't want to check one by one and approve it, he want to approve the 20 requests directly from one time, is there any solution for that??
Thanks and RegardsHi Adel,
As Vignesh has mentioned we don't have any standard functionality which will allow bulk approvals. We had same kind of requirement in performance management where the business was asking for a bulk approval feature which should be available to Skip level manager for approving the rating suggested by line manager. We had created a custom page which will list all the notifications and user can select the ones which S/He wants to bulk approve and click submit button. Internally we had called the workflow with item key and other required parameter and do the approval.
You can have a work with your technical guy and can work on the same lines.
Thanks,
Sanjay -
Parallel Approval in Self Servie HR (SSHR)
Hi All,
We have a requirement in which we need to send approval to multiple people at once. And if any approver approves the transaction, it should be considered approved and should not require any further approvals.
According to the metalink note 473038.1, parallel approval is not possible in SSHR but the workaround is available using Roles in HRMS.
I tried using this workaround and it seems only half of this solution is working and half not. It sends approvals and it is visible in Worklist but not sending any approval emails for approvers. Approver has to go into SSHR and has to approve the transaction. There is no push notification or any other way for approver to know that there is any action pending for his attention. Is there any solution which can send approval mails? Or any other solution for the parallel approvals?
Thanks for help in advance.
Regards,
CAHHi,
Thanks for looking into the issue.
I can receive the FYI notifications. So the notification mailer is up. Also, for other transactions, where only one approver is required, I am able to receive the notification. So Notification Style is also not disabled.
Any other thought?
Thanks,
Chirag -
General Approval Process in SSHR
HI all
We are trying to get One way Approval process .That's when an applies or changes in personal forms ,Then it has to go it immediate manager.How to do this ? I need to know how to get this proceess to be done? If we need to use AME,what are basic steps to achieve this. Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.
Cheers
Kumar csHi Kumar
You can set up AME Rules for standard Oracle Self Service Human Resources Transaction Type.
Go to AME Administrator => Approvals
Select Transaction Type => Oracle SSHR
Then create conditions on which you want to initiate your approval process. Base condition will be like your workflow process name and then you can go ahead and add different conditions in different scenarios.
Once you have defined the conditions define the group of persons you want to send the notification for approval or FYI.
and then create the rules by selected conditions and groups.
For detailed configuration you can go through the AME Developer guide at following link.
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B40089_09/current/acrobat/120ameig.pdf
Hope this helps
Gaurav -
Approval Process in SSHR using Approval Management
Could any one suggest for the below mentioned issue ?
I have set up the approval process using approval management. But when I tried to test the approval process in both the ways ('Create a test transaction' and 'View a real transaction's approval process), I am receiving different error messages.
1. if I test by using 'View a real transaction's approval process'
receiving the error message saying "ORA-20001: The attribute TRANSACTION_REQUESTOR_PERSON_ID probably has an invalid query string. The attribute caused the following exception:
-972
ORA-00972: identifier is too long"
2. if I test by using 'create a test creation' receiving error message as "ORA-20001: Casey Browning (Browning, Doctor Casey) lacks a supervisor, so OAM cannot complete the chain of authority for the transaction"
What am i missing in the setups ?
which way is the recommended way to test the process ?
Your response is more appreciated.
Regards
JhansiFor you to test Approvals, you have to setup a number of things;
1. Supervisor Hierarchy (If using that as hierarchy)
2. Job Levels (If using Job-level approvals)
3. New rules for SSHR functions.
The getApprStartingPointPersonId function returns the starting point person ID for the transaction in the HR_API_TRANSACTIONS table. It uses that to traverse the supervisor hierarchy based on the approval.
Hope this helps. -
Approval in SSHR for Basic Details in Personal Information
Hi Gurus,
I have a requirement for Approvals by Human Resource Analyst when the employee changes his name.I have Implemented this by
Changing the HR_APPROVAL_REQ_FLAG to Yes Dynamic in the Review page of the Process Basic Details Function Workflow(HRSSA).
I have also created a Approval Group in AME and attached the Transaction Type Oracle Self Service Human Resources.
This works as intended.
We need approvals when an Employee changes his name only but on the Basic Details in Personal Information , employee can change his Marital Status also.
Now the Process is Requiring Approvals when the employee changes his maritial status.We want to send a notification when when the employee changes marital status and no need of approval.
Anybody has any idea how to accomplish this one ?.
btw I tried to create a AME attribute to check only for name change and attached to the Rule but its not sending the notifications and also the work flow process
is not completing .
Thanks,I suggest running through your setup again and double-checking each part, as I have had this working before.
For clarity, I normally duplicate all the standard workflow processes, form functions, and create a new AME Transaction Type when customizing SSHR approvals e.g.
WORKFLOW:
Duplicate
HR_PERSONAL_INFO_JSP_PRC --> XX_PERSONAL_INFO_JSP_PRC
HR_PROCESS_BASIC_DET_JSP_PRC --> XX_PROCESS_BASIC_DET_JSP_PRC (place inside XX_PERSONAL_INFO_JSP_PRC as a subprocess)
In XX_PROCESS_BASIC_DET_JSP_PRC amend the Review page with the Yes - Dynamic Approvals (Node Attribute)
FORM FUNCTION:
XX_PERINFO_SS
XX Personal Information
pAMETranType=XXX&pAMEAppId=800&pProcessName=XX_PERSONAL_INFO_JSP_PRC&pItemType=HRSSA&pCalledFrom=XX_PERINFO_SS&pPersonID=&pFromMenu=Y
OA.jsp?akRegionCode=HR_CREATE_PROCESS_TOP_SS&akRegionApplicationId=800&OAFunc=XX_PERINFO_SS
ADD EMPLOYEE FORM FUNCTION TO MENUS:
HR_EMPLOYEE_DIRECT_ACCESS_V4.0
HR_GLOBAL_SS_FUNCTIONS_CUSTOM
CREATE NEW TRANSACTION TYPE: XXX
Application: Human Resources
Item Class:
Header 1 Serial Serial
Mandatory Attributes:
ALLOW_DELETING_RULE_GENERATED_APPROVERS Static False
ALLOW_REQUESTOR_APPROVAL Dynamic "SELECT HR_WORKFLOW_SS.allow_requestor_approval(:transactionId)
FROM DUAL"
AT_LEAST_ONE_RULE_MUST_APPLY Static False
EFFECTIVE_RULE_DATE Static
EVALUATE_PRIORITIES_PER_ITEM Static False
REJECTION_RESPONSE Static Stop All Processing
REPEAT_SUBSTITUTIONS Static False
USE_RESTRICTIVE_ITEM_EVALUATION Static False
USE_WORKFLOW Static True
WORKFLOW_ITEM_KEY Static SELECT hr_ameutil_ss.get_item_key(:transactionId) FROM DUAL
WORKFLOW_ITEM_TYPE Static SELECT hr_ameutil_ss.get_item_type(:transactionId) FROM DUAL
Add Existing AME Attribute: TRANSACTION_REQUESTOR_PERSON_ID
Approver Type: HR People
Type: Number
Usage Type: Dynamic
Value:
SELECT hr_ameutil_ss.get_requestor_person_id(:transactionId) FROM DUAL
Add New AME Attribute: XX_PERSON_NAME_UPDATE
Type: Number
Usage Type: Dynamic
Value:
select count(*) from hr_api_transactions hat, hr_api_transaction_steps hats, hr_api_transaction_values hatv where hat.transaction_id = hats.transaction_id and hats.transaction_step_id = hatv.transaction_step_id and hatv.varchar2_value is not null and hatv.name = 'P_LAST_NAME' and hat.transaction_id = :transactionId
AME Condition:
XX_PERSON_NAME_UPDATE is greater than or equal to 1
AME Rule:
XX_NEW_RULE
Add Condition: XX_PERSON_NAME_UPDATE is greater than or equal to 1
Add Action: ...(your approval chain)...
Regards,
Michael -
Remove Approval Required for SIT in SSHR
Hi
We've added Special Information to Employee Self Service but it goes through the approval hierarchy. How do we de-activate this so that no approval is required. The SIT is forms based.
ThanksAll the SSHR workflow transactions are by default included in an AME condition which goes to the supervisor hierarchy.
To disable this rule:
either remove the SIT JSP_PRC attribute from this standard AME Condition (it will be easy to spot as it has a long list of workflow process names in the condition)
or
remove the AME call from the function parameters for this workflow transaction. The parameters will look something like this
&pAMETranType=SSHRMS&pAMEAppId=800&pProcessName=HR_GENERIC_APPROVAL_PRC
Regards
Tim
Edited by: TimW on Nov 14, 2008 2:30 PM -
Supervisor Approval in SSHR not going
Gurus,
I have oracle SSHR for my client.
Whenever a person changes his/her address in Personal Information screen, a notification should go to 1st level supervisor for approval.
It is not going at present. What can be the issue? Any pointers in this regard will be of great help.
Regards,
NoviceHi,
Can you verify workflow attribute setup.
open workflow builder ==> load HR workflow ==> open workflow process for Personal information change ==> in that process you will find sub process for address change ==> in this process ==> at review page node ==> right click on review page node ==> check the "dynamic approval required" attribute value is set to "yes-dynamic approval".
if this attribute is set properly then only it will call ame for approval.
Regards, -
SSHR: Leaves Still "Pending for approval" after last approver
Hi,
After Approving the absence through SSHR from the last approver , it still pending for approval and was not transferd to the Application.
Is there any specific configuration i've to do to enable the Approval process to be completed.
we use AME for Approval.
Apps Version : 11.5.10.2
waiting for your help, please.
thanks
Edited by: Smarteng on Mar 21, 2012 6:30 AMHi,
The issue has been resolved, the reason was rhat the profile option HR:Defer Update After Approval was set to No and the backgroun process was running with no parameters, it should be running with the following parameters in order to update the database with the SSHR transaction:
Item Type = HR
Process Deferred = Yes
Process Timeout = No
Process Stuck = No
Thanks for all for your help. -
SSHR - APPROVAL CHAIN IS OPEN, APPROVAL LIST SHOWS ALL SUPERVISORS
Hi,
In SSHR,I'm trying to raise any Approval Based Request like leave of Absence, Appraisal etc.. in approvers list shows
all Supervisor list.
We are using Seeded Workflow with Customized menu, Responsibility. We have the same issue with seeded responsibility also.
The Approval Chain is open and its keep on adding the Approver List based on
supervisor Chain.
We haven't defined "Supervisor Hierarchy "
Pl suggestYou may need to configure AME and redefine the default approver rule. I believe the default rule 'out of the box' is approval up 10 levels of the supervisor hierarchy. If you change that action to the action that matches up to approval up 1 level of the supervisor hierarchy, I think you'll be where you want to be.
-
"Return for Correction" button in SSHR approval notification directing to External URL
In SSHR approval workflow notification mail, if we click on "Request for Correction" button, an incorrect URL is loaded.
1 - Where should this be setup to direct to the particular notification in workflist in Oracle page?
2 - How can we remove this functionality in the notification?
Thanks,
SumanthCheck the Node attributes in the Return for Correction process through workflow builder. That should tell you where it will be sending the email.
-
Dear all,
we've implemented SSHR in our environment ..am stucked with the following scenarios :
1) approval flow for all the department is like :
for any employee :
1) immediate supervisor
2) HR manager
3) CEO
where immediate supervisor is the manager of the employee's department
what happens if the department manager resigns his/her job.. how we can change temporarly to only HR and CEO. is this a bug related to 4552553.. any idea ?
2) what could be the chance that the leave admin is not getting the final approval from a manager ?
Thanks and Please guide
Kai1) This question depends somewhat on how you are modelling the 'immediate supervisor'. You mention that the immediate supervisor is 'the manager of the employee's department'. So - you must either be i) manually assigning the department manager as the employee's supervisor, using the Supervisor LOV on the assignment form or ii) somehow linking an employee to an organization and deriving the 'immediate supervisor' by looking at the org on the employee's assignment and cross referencing to the 'Organization Manager'.
In case 1), if the supervisor is terminated, it 'breaks' the supervisor hierarchy and, I believe, default AME behaviour is simply to throw an error and give an empty approver list
In case 2), you must have implemented that through an AME rule and therefore it is really down to how that has been coded.
I suspect you are using case i) and then have modelled the HR Dept and CEO approvals using a post-approval rule in AME.
The 'bug' you mentioned (4552553) is relevant but unfortunately, is not a bug, it is an Enhancement Request and so you shouldn't pin any hopes on it. Instead, I recommend you override the default supervisor approver functionality by writing your own AME rule to retrieve an employee's supervisor, returning an empty list if you find that supervisor to be terminated.
2) I don't understand the question, can you clarify? -
Extend the notification time out for SSHR approval requests
Hi,
I want to extend the due date (Approval notification time out) of SSHR notification approval from 3 to 5. But I could not able to found any attribute having 3 days (4320 minutes). In hrssa workflow, I have found the constant value 525600 for attribute HR_APPROVER_NTF_TIMEOUT_ATTR (Approver Notification timeout in Minutes).
Please help out how to change value of notification time out?
Regards,
UmarHi Kashif / Hassnain
I follow the given steps in suggested notes and did required changes for five days. It gives following errors while saving the workflow.
Note: It is the first time; I am doing modification in workflow. Please guide, is there any prerequisite which I need to follow before doing changes in workflow?
Errors:*
382: Design Validation generated 12 warning(s). You may save invalid definitions but they should not be used in running process.
354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_SAVE_FOR_LATER_OTHER_NTF'.
351: Notification activity's message must have a respond attribute named 'RESULT' with lookup type 'HR_V5_ALL_RESPONSES'.
354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_SAVE_FOR_LATER'.
351: Notification activity's message must have a respond attribute named 'RESULT' with lookup type 'HR_V5_ALL_RESPONSES'.
354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_NOTIFY_RFC_OTHER_NTF'.
351: Notification activity's message must have a respond attribute named 'RESULT' with lookup type 'HR_V5_ALL_RESPONSES'.
354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_NOTIFY_RFC_INITIATOR_NTF'.
351: Notification activity's message must have a respond attribute named 'RESULT' with lookup type 'HR_V5_ALL_RESPONSES'.
354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_NOTFY_APPROVER_NTF'.
351: Notification activity's message must have a respond attribute named 'RESULT' with lookup type 'HR_V5_ALL_RESPONSES'.
354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_INITIATOR_SFL_NTF'.
351: Notification activity's message must have a respond attribute named 'RESULT' with lookup type 'HR_V5_ALL_RESPONSES'.
354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_INITIATOR_RFC_NTF'.
351: Notification activity's message must have a respond attribute named 'RESULT' with lookup type 'HR_V5_ALL_RESPONSES'.
354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_APPROVER_SFL_NTF'.
351: Notification activity's message must have a respond attribute named 'RESULT' with lookup type 'HR_V5_ALL_RESPONSES'.
354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_APPROVER_RFC_NTF'.
351: Notification activity's message must have a respond attribute named 'RESULT' with lookup type 'HR_V5_ALL_RESPONSES'.
354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_APPROVER_NTF'.
351: Notification activity's message must have a respond attribute named 'RESULT' with lookup type 'HR_V5_ALL_RESPONSES'.
354: 'SAVE' validation failed for activity 'HRSSA/HR_APPRAISAL_REJECTED_PRC'.
362: Validation failed for child activity 'HRSSA/HR_NTF_FINAL_REJ_EMP_V4_NTF'.
383: Notification activity must be assigned a performer when used in a process.
328: 'SAVE' validation failed for message 'HRSSA/HR_APPRAISAL_MACHANGE_MGR_MSG'.
401: Could not find token 'APPRAISEE_NAME' among message attributes -
Not recieving notifications when leave has been approved in sshr
hi everyone?
we recently integrated our SSHR with AME.
when an employee applies for leave, and the first approver approves, the leave is forwarded to the second approver and a FYI notification is send to the employee
informing them that the leave has been forwarded to the second approver.
The issue: when the second approver approves the leave - no notifications are send out to the first approver and the employee.
thanks..Hi Luziah,
System never send a notification to first approver when the second approver approves, but it definitely will notify the employee that his/her leave has got approved. Can you check if your "Workflow Background process" is running in background, if not then run and schedule this request and check if it sorts your issue.
Thanks,
Sanjay -
How to Get Approver details of Leave Request in SSHR in oracle apps r12
Dear All,
we have requirement to get the approver details of leave , Please let me know if there is any way .Hi,
There are two BADi's which can help you to deal with ESS leave requests PT_GEN_REQ and PT_ABS_REQ. just try to check out the above two badi's . There is a method in the default implementation class with name FIND_DEFAULT_AND_RESP_ACTOR..
Regards
Pavan
Maybe you are looking for
-
I connected my iPhone 4S to a bluetooth headset, and I went to setting/general/access ability/ and whatever else to set it up to where when I receive a call it goes to my headset automatically, but when I receive a text it doesn't come through to my
-
Windows version 7. Auto update of iTunes to version 12.1 from 12.0.1. At end of install process, message 'iTunes was not installed correctly. Error 7 (Windows error 127). Tried to launch iTunes, anyway, but immediately got message 'The procedure entr
-
Scroll wheel erratic in Firefox 17
I'm using a Logitech Performance MX mouse and Microsoft Wireless Desktop Elite keyboard in Windows 8 64-bit and Firefox 17. All software/drivers are the latest available. The mousewheel functions erratically; the keyboard scrollwheel doesn't operate
-
Want to hook up my laptop with guitar amp to hear garageband effects
I have a MBP (early 2008) and use garageband with a blue snowflake microphone and headphones to record. However, I was wondering if it would possible to have my laptop hooked up to my Marshall MG10 CF amp when I am in garageband just messing around w
-
A while back I was asking about the possibility of a 'title-safe' feature in Keynote. Unfortunately, there isn't such a thing. Someone did suggest a work-around as follows: "No there is not. You can however make a rectangle shape with no fill, and a