Doubt about the settlement rule of the Production ORder
The only default distribution rule allowed for a PP order is PP1 or PP2. We would need to change that to allow settlement to multiple receivers as a default. If that is the case, we may want to look into a user exit to update the settlement rule during production order creation instead so that the G/L account is correct from the beginning.
Currently when we create the production order, the settlement rule will default the below, I am not sure if a user exit is able to maintain the Source as 200 (Materials)?
If yes, we can then add the second rule for Source 100 (Labor and Mfg) via the user exit as well.
In this case, SAP will not prompt us error of settlement with 200%, as they are from difference Sources.
now anybody can explain me about the User EXit we have to correct this
any help on this.. please its very urgent
thanks in advance
Similar Messages
-
User Exit for the Settle rule of a Production Order
Hello all
i got a requirement to change the settlement rule of a production order to multiple receivers.
suppose i have the following rule
Categeory | Settlement Reciever | Receiver Short text | % | Settlement Type | No | Source Assignment
MAT ZMDT89 ZMDT88 100 FUL 1 left as blank
now my requirement is that i have to default the source assignment as 200 (Materials) so as to allow the other reciever entered with the same settlement type as FUL and also the No should be 2
i.e. my req is like this
Categeory | Settlement Reciever | Receiver Short text | % | Settlement Type | No | Source Assignment
MAT ZMDT89 ZMDT88 100 FUL 1 200
G/L G/L A/C no G/L shor text 100 FUL 2 100
the bold one is i have to ADD
the T-Code is CO02.
your help is highly appreciated...
thanks in advancehi,
check these exits in co02.
Transaction Code - CO02 Change Production Order
Enhancement/ Business Add-in Description
Enhancement
PPCO0010 Enhancement in make-to-order production - Unit of measure
PPCO0012 Production Order: Display/Change Order Header Data
PPCO0013 Change priorities of selection crit. for batch determination
PPCO0015 Additional check for document links from BOMs
PPCO0016 Additional check for document links from master data
PPCO0017 Additional check for online processing of document links
PPCO0018 Check for changes to production order header
PPCO0019 Checks for changes to order operations
PPCO0021 Release Control for Automatic Batch Determination
PPCO0022 Determination of Production Memo
PPCO0023 Checks Changes to Order Components
STATTEXT Modification exit for formatting status text lines
PPCO0009 Enhancement in goods movements for prod. process order
CCOWB001 Customer exit for modifying menu entries
COIB0001 Customer Exit for As-Built Assignment Tool
COZF0001 Change purchase req. for externally processed operation
COZF0002 Change purchase req. for externally procured component
PPCO0001 Application development: PP orders
PPCO0002 Check exit for setting delete mark / deletion indicator
PPCO0003 Check exit for order changes from sales order
PPCO0004 Sort and processing exit: Mass processing orders
PPCO0005 Storage location/backflushing when order is created
PPCO0006 Enhancement to specify defaults for fields in order header
PPCO0007 Exit when saving production order
PPCO0008 Enhancement in the adding and changing of components
reward points if hlpful. -
Shortdump upon calculating settlement rule in co-product-orders w/rule PP6
Hello,
We use production orders with co-products. Production Order Type contains distribution rule PP6 (settlement of co-products by actual cuantities). We have installed the MILL-funcionality
If we create a production order for a small quantity, the system gives a shortdump upon calculating the distribution rules in the settlement rule in the order.
Key-words in shortdump:
COMPUTE_INT_TIMES_OVERFLOW
CX_SY_ARITHMETIC_OVERFLOW
in procedure "MILL_IT_CALCULATE_BASEQUANTITY" "(FUNCTION)"
If we create the order with a sufficient big quantity, information messages appear, telling that are rounding errors creating the settlement rule in the order. The order nevertheless is created correctly and no shortdump appears.
We already implemented notes 1349991 and 1524822 but they dont resolve this problem.
Any clues?
Thanks for any answer on this strange problem we face.
AartThanks,
We aplied the notes you suggested but it didnt sove the problem.
Any sugestions?
Thanks.
Aart -
How to settle the production order variance to 3 GL account
dear all
i met a problem in the project ,the customer need see the production order variance category detail for (material,routine,overhead variance) in FI report ,so it need to settle the variance to at least 3 GL account
i don't know how to configure it ,i try to use result analyse like wip ,but go failed
do you have some suggestion
thank youHi ,
Through Standard SAP .. the same it not possible . Standard SAP will post the differences to one GL account ..The variance amount is not segregated..
The way out is to use report KKO0 .( Product Costing Drill Down Reports ) in CO . There are many reports available .. and you can compute the difference in CO Reports and manually make an entry in FI by manually reversing the original variance account and posting it to cost component wise variance accounts ..
To use the KKO0 report.. please perform the following tasks :-
1. Assign cost component structure in transaction OKN0 ( Date Extraction/Product Drill Down) tab.
2. Product Group Type = Material group..
3. Run KKRV after period end every month to collect the data for drill down reporting..
Please revert back for any further clarifications
Regards
Sarada
Sarada -
Doubt about the sizing in the CPH
Hi gurus!
I have the following doubt about the sizing in the CPH. I'm going to implement the CCMS BI CONTENT, i read the Note 979581 - Installing and configuring the CCMS BI Content, but in the document called "IT Performance Reporting Using SAP NetWeaver Business Intelligence" you can see images in this link:
http://www.servidor-imagenes.com/show-image.php?id=050236bd91654e16c94a559350611dff
here said how I can calculate the sizing based in Data Record Size per each Metric stored, but in specific, about the example: 20 systems, 17 CPH metrics. are included SCM, BI, ECC, SOLMAN in this 20 systems? And about the 17 CPH Metrics is talking about ratios? what's mean the CPH metrics?, How can I know what is my CPH metrics?
I hope can help me
Best Regards
Ramon Sanchezthis theme has been closed on our enterprise
-
hi,
what are steps to settle the production order( order settlement)
thanks & regards,
elanchiHi,
Follow below steps for order settlement. Before order settlement confirmation must be done i.e order should have CNF status.
- After Final Confirmation of Order make GR for for order using Tcode : MIGO / MB31 for manual or at confirmation with auto goods reciept. so Production Order Status will be delivered -DLV.
-Then complete the order technically in CO02 - Functions ( Menu)--- Restrict Processing -
Technically Complete. TECO for multiple Orders in mass basis with COHV.
-Next Calculate Overheads using Tcode KGI2 (Individual Processing) or CO43 (Collective Processing)
-Then Calculate WIP using Tcode KKAX (Individual Processing) or
KKAO(Collective Processing).
-After that Calculate Variance by Tcode KKS2(Individual Processing) or KKS1 (Collective Processing)
-Finally do the settlement of Order with Tcode KO88 (Individual Processing) or CO88 (Collective Processing).
After settlement order balance will be zero & then you can do the closing of order.
in CO02 - Functions ( Menu)--- Restrict Processing -
Close. Close for multiple Orders in mass basis with COHV.
Hope this will help you. -
Doubt about the distribution system
I have a doubt about the distribution system.
We have made a publication and download it and have it in our iPad. The client does not want tosell or that anyone other than its 15 commercial rest her ipad. How can we host it in those 15ipads?, Do I need any of the subscription programs adobe?
Thanks!function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}Matthew Laun wrote:
Yeah... Someone did that yesterday with 70-something users all trying to get the updated folio at once, and it caused server outages. I've got a feeling we may modify the user agreement to limit this. Not saying for sure, just a word of caution.
Matthew
I don't understand this reply at all. Many of us have been using acrobat.com in exactly this fashion, and I've posted about it many times; including a full review:
http://forums.adobe.com/message/3853106#3853106
Did Adobe not see this coming? How would you limit the download amount without gutting the functionality? Would this apply to paid acrobat.com accounts as well?
I'm about to upgrade my acrobat.com account this week to host more than 1 folio. You need to clarify what you mean by 'modify the user agreement' ASAP. -
GR for production order post to cost center and not to the production order
Hi all,
when we post the goods receipt for the finished product against the production order (mov. type 101), the order is not credited with the corresponding stock value. Instead of this, the value accounts to a cost center.
We specified this cost center in OKB9 (Default account assignment), because if not, we get an error when posting the goods receipt cause of lacking accounting object.
I can't see why the system does not credit the production order?
Any ideas?
Thanks for your time
DanielHi Daniel,
This is the first time i am coming across an issue like this.
neverthless from a logical front,
1. Remove Cost center as a valid receiver in Settlement Profile.
2. Your OKB9 setting are pretty much good. No need to worry about it. Becasue, OKB9 only will work if the system doesn't identify any other cost object. In this case Production Order is an automatic cost object which system should have taken.
3. Check the Settlement rule when you have created Production Order. It should have been MAT.
4. I hope you are creating Production Order with Material (using CO01 and not CO07)
5. Make sure in OPL8, the default rule in controlling tab is PP1.
Once all these are fine, i do not see any reason why you will get your probelm.
Please check and revert back to me if the problem still persists.
Best Regards
Surya -
Field "GR Non-valuated" in tab "Goods receipt" of the production order
Hi,
When creating a production order, the field "GR Non-valuated" in tab "Goods receipt" is checked by default, due to my assessment customizing.
This field indicates to the system that it should not create any accounting document, whereas I would like to create one. Does anyone know how to withdraw this automatically check?
FYI, I do not use COPA and the very basic of CO-PC and I would like to create automatically a default assessment rule (cost center).
Thanks for your help.
RonanHi,
please note that this is not an MM, but a PP-SCF related issue. It does not belong to the forum ERP MM.
The indicator AFPOD-WEUNB is set automatically as soon
as you do not settle your production order to category 'MAT' (see
settlement rule). If the order is not settled to a material, then the
Goods Receipt will not be valuated and the flag G/R Non-valuated (WEUNB)
is set. Only when you settle to a Material is the G/R Non-valuated not
set, and you will receive FI postings in the case of such a movement.
This is standard system behaviour.
Please review the following notes relating to settlement rules: 518496,
400400.
To make sure that the GR-Nonvaluated flag is not set in the
production order, field KZBWS must already be filled with 'M' in the
customer requirement. For that, please set the field KZBWS='M' for the
requirement class that is used (see 'General Customizing' in note
459734). PLAF-KZBWS (indicator:valuation of special stock).
Regards,
Edit -
Open the reservation for the Production order
Hi,
I have post the GI for Production order MB1A with movement type 261 from 100 peaces components. I would like to cancel a partial quantity of components from this posting (about 30 peaces). After cancel it the reservation for the production order has to be open for 30 peaces of components.
I've canceled it through MB1A and mtype 262 but the reservations weren't open and in the PO (component overview there is always the sign"the Final Issue for This Reservation").
Which T.code and mtype could I use.
Thanks
DedeHi,
Have you cancelled the movement (of 30 pieces) by selecting the "with reference" option from the menu?
If not, then reverse the current cancellation document. Then again cancel the 261 movemtn by selecting the with refernce button from the menu. It will sove the problem.
Check & revert.
Regards,
Rohit. -
Closing the Production Order with status PCNF
Hi Experts,
May I kindly ask if I can close an order with status Partially confirmed? If not, how can I cancel the confirmation if I had already reversed the goods movement in the confirmation thereby flagging an error of a deficit in the material quantity during cancellation of the confirmation?
I really need your help since I need to close the production orders with this case.
Hoping so much for your replies.
Many thanks in advance.
Sincerely,
RiaRia,
I am not so clear about the exact situation.
When you say you have reversed the goods movement with MIGO, is it reversal of the documents posted with confirmation or the individual documents?
You can only cancle the document with MIGO which are independent of the confirmation.
The documents which are with the confirmation can not be reversed in any case with MIGO.
I suggets you go this way,
1. Check why system is giving you error as 'Deficit......'. The one thing I suspect that you must have performed auto GR & moved out the stock of FG from that location.
If it's so then bring back the stock to it's original location & cancel the confirmation.
While cancelling the confirmation where you might have executed goods issue with backflush this error won't arise as the stock will be bring back to storage location form the order.
Don't reverse the cancellation of the of the documents youhave performed with MIGO for independent material posting on the order. Keep it as it is.
This way the cancellation of confirmation & material movement will be done & now cost on the order will be zero.
You can assign the status CLSD as well as DLFL to the order.
2. In case you find the above activities can not be carried out for some reason then give status TECO to the order.
Sttle the order so that the cost on the order will be zero, then give status CLSD.
As far as possible stick to solution no. 1 only.
Go for solution no. 2 when you don't have any other option.
Hope this helps you.
SmanS -
Problem while releasing the production order.
Hai gurus,
When i release the production order , SAP doesn't block when i have a deficit of stock for some materails.I checked all the customizing and found every thing is fine.
As the materials that has defict stock has back flush indicator, is that the reason why the system is assuming the stock when releasing.Hi,
You need to consider the following customization settings
(1) OPJK - For the Plant/Order type/Availability check-2 for the material availability - Release material - set the indicator '3' No release if parts are missing
(2) OPJJ - For availability check & checking rule - check what all elements are considered as part of ATP check.
With these settings - in the production order if the order header has status MSPT - Missing parts (i.e. components are missing) only then system will stop the release of the order.
I hope this addresses your query
Warm regards,
Umesh -
Scrap Quantity component in the production order
Dear gurus,
in the material master of a component i insert the scrap % ( view mrp4) = 10 %.
The field is read by planning Mrp and explosion of bom , but when i inseert this component in the production order manually the system don't read this % and the field "scrap quantity in the component detail of the production order is blank.
Are there a setting for uograde this field ( in the production order ) when i insert MANUALLY the component in the production order?
Example:
1) material master of the component > scrap % (view MRP4 ) = 10 %
2) production order created
3) insert this component quantity 100 pc and the system after read the material master insert 110 pc , and upgrade the field automatically 10 % (as material master)?
Thansk a lot
Daniele Pistilli
PP TEAMHi Danielepistilli,
Well there is a lot of difference is there: see you are creating production order for header material which is FG. If you maintained component scrap in material level it will be dependent on BOM quantity which you maintained for the header material.
For example say component x quantity is 50 in BOM. How it will calculate when you run the MRP.
component scrap % is 5% then:
===> (5/100) * 50 + 50
Formula is: Percentage of scrap quantity x original quantity + original quantity
So ===> 52.5 quantity should be come for component
So, the order quantity for the header material will not take this quantity or scrap but if you see individually in MD04 screen for X material you can find this quantity ok.
I hope it clears your doubt and helps you any queries please revert me back.
Regards,
Madhu.G -
Attached Documents in the Production order
Hello,
My question is:
how to setup the system to be able from the Production order to see (and have access) to the documents attached to the BOM and/or Routing?
Thank you in advance.
PeterHi,
In production order if you notice you should be able to find a link for documents. In the documents page you would be able to get the documents attached in the BOM (not sure about the routing, please check).
But do note that this is just a link & the order does not store these documents, you will have to go to DMS (CV03n) to view the document.
In OPKP (production scheduling profile) you select the option to link the documents on release.
Hope the above helps.
Regards,
Vivek -
Consumption during the processing time of the production order
Which adjustments must be made in the material master for the calculation of the lot size in the MRP run, that the consumption of the material during the processing time of the production order is considered for the calculation of the lot size.
Hi ,
You have to judiciously indicate the re order point in the material master( the re-order point is the sum of saftey stock and consumption during replenishment lead time).
How ever , this does not in any way influence the lot size , but only influence the no of lots i.e the procurement proposals. The lot size is determined by the lot sizing procedure selected by you , depending on various factors like agrrements with your vendor , optimum lot sizes to reduce the cost of procurment and storages etc.
You can refer to the following url for details on lot size :http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/fe/819b9f643b11d3b4e40004ac160649/frameset.htm
and for details about re order point :
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/db/6f143ea7ec11d3a8330000e82a3c24/frameset.htm
Hope this information will be useful.
Regards
Raghuramam.
Maybe you are looking for
-
I need report on. 1.) Need the most current spreadsheet of approvers of PO's for North America. 2.) Need a report of requisitioners that have raised a requisition in the time period of January 1, 2010 through July 20, 2010.
-
Excise document is posted later to material document Messaage no.81576
hi, at the time of reconciliation of sub challan i am getting this message i.e error message. in the material document there r two materials which has to be reconcile for that i have entered two challan .
-
Copying aperture files into iFinder
When I click on Finder/Photos I only see the ones that were saved through iPhoto, but not the ones I've saved now through Aperture, how do I see ALL photos in both programs in Finder?
-
Disk 2 of 9i Enterprise Edition for Linux corrupted
I've attempted to download the second disk of 9i EE for Linux four times already and everytime, when I unzip it, I get a file corrupt error, which isnt surprising because the downloaded file size is only 450Mb. I monitored my last download from start
-
Currently we have one client and one server configured using telnet. Is it possible to add another server (either different IP address or port number) and send client message to a target server resolved by the content of message?