Downpayment Against Capital PO
Dear All,
I defined Down payment Clearing Account in AO90 but i want to know which tyoe of GL account I should maintain for down payment clearing.
Please help me.
Thanks & Regards,
Mahendra Gupta
please check the configuration of your downpayment at transaction AO73 (Activate capitalize fix asset).
Also, you should make sure you define the relevant G/L accounts to post downpayment.
->goto t/c:AO90
define down payment accounts for AuC asset class
Acq. downpayment
downpayment clearing
Basically in the customizing, you should define down payment accounts for AuC asset class:
Acq. downpayment -> should be asset reconciliation account.
downpayment clearing -> this is a normal GL account(not AA rec.account
The postings are like follows:
F-48 downpayment
50 Bank 100-
29A vendor 100 (field status set,asset 'option')
70 asset 100 <- Acq. downpayment account in Ao90 invoice
31 vendor 200-
70 asset 200
F-54 clearing invoice
39A vendor 100- <- clearing downpayment
26 vendor 100
75 asset 100- <- clearing downpayment Asset
40 clearing 100 <- clearing 'downpayment clearing account'
In summary, you can avoid the error as follows:
1. Filling the missing account in AO85 or AO90 OR
2. reversing the down payments of the orders.
The functionality down-payment in asset module is designed as what you have seen. Normally it posts to an AuC first in down-payment and then reverse it in invoice clearing (F-54).
Please also refer to the attached note 310368 solution 2:
"2.If, for some reason, you do not want to do this, but this scenario is
essential for your accounting, then contact SAP remote consulting. A
solution will accompany a modification which cannot be supported by
SAP support."
Please see the following note:
762526 Depreciation on down payment clearing: Transaction
Unfortunately it is not possible to turn error AA866 into a warning message.
I hope this information helps.
Similar Messages
-
How to knock off Vendor downpayment against Vendor Invoice
Hi,
I have made a Vendor downpayment from F-48 & my entries are
Vendor 7000 Dr
Bank 7000 Cr
I Posted a Invoice for service tax from FB60 with entries
Vendor 7000 Cr
Building construction 6410.7 Dr
A/P Service tax interim 641.07 Dr
A/P Service Tax ECS 12.82 Dr
A/P Service Tax SHEC 6.41 Dr
TDS 71 Cr
In FBL1N the invoice is showing as Open Item.
I want to knock off the Downpayment against Invoice. What is the procedure?Hi,
Please use F-44 and make sure you have to mention special GL indicator under open item selection tab.
Then only the line item will be diplayed.
Rgds
Murali. N -
Downpayment against Internal Order
I have created a statistical internal order for Asset Under Construction and assigne iin Asset Master Record. Budget is also allocated.
At the time of migo system give POP UP if value exceeded from budget.
Client requirement is :
1. Downpayment against Internal Order
2. Need POP UP if downpayment is morethan budget.
Please help.
regards
imdadHi,
Maintain cost elements for the down payments (OKEP transaction) and the budget will be checked in regular procedure. You can read more here:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/2a/f9f71b493111d182b70000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Regards,
Eli -
Dear Experts,
Have a query..
Downpayment against Purchase order is not comming correctly.System is not allowing more than one line item value but it is accepting duplicate payments against the same line item.
Request to kindly clarify this at the earliest..
Any help would be much appreciated.HI Durga,
Normally in EHP4 Onwards the Down Payment is directly link with PO. If you have maintained the Down Payment over there then system ll allow up to that amount. If you are not mentioned any amount in the Down Payment column then system ll allow you pay more then the PO Value.
Let us know, what is exactly your requirement.
Regards
Raj -
Control downpayment against Purchase order
Hi all,
After so long time i came to forum.
Prevoiusly i did not respond proper way to the forum friens.
For this i am extremly sorry...
Now i am getting a problem on downpayment.
Actulayy My PO Value RS 150000
Against PO my down payment should not exseeds the PO amount.
In this case how can i controal my down payment.
Please give me some sugation on this issue.
Regards,
BramhaDear dudekula,
Frist make sure that purchase order is mandatory for making down payment. You can set this via screen layout or feild varient.
You can make sure that is compulsory via
Financial Accounting (New)->Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable->Business Transactions->Make and Check Document Settings-->Define Field Status Variants.
system by defualt gives a massge for exceeding the down payment than PO value.
You have to convert that information massage in error massage via T-Code.OBA5
Now system will stop agianst exceeding PO value for down payment.
Regards
Parag -
How can I cancell a Downpayment against a Purchase Order?
Hello SAP experts/friends!
Is there a way to cancel a downpayment without processing it? I am being told that the only way to cancel it is to actually process the invoices. I don't want to process the invoices against the line item where the DP was issued against. The decision to purchase line item 10 has changed since a few months ago. Line item 10 has been replaced by line item 20. The DP paid against line item 10 still stands against this vendor. In other words, we want line item 10 deleted, but the system won't let us delete it, because there is an outstanding DP against it.
Any ideas? please let me know! Thank you, in advance!
Rgds,
ArocelPlease cancel the invoices and GRNs for line item 10,you will be able to delete line item 10 and then proceed with line item 20.
Generate credit memo for posted invoices.
Edited by: Din@Das on Jun 2, 2011 7:06 AM -
Hi all,
USer has created PO and did GRN and downpayment but PO history downpayment has not been reflected.
But when i see accounting documeting of GRN in FB03 it is showning that downpayment with reference to that PO has been done.
SO please provide me any standard report od downpayment against PO...so that i can cross check?
or suggest any other process for the same...
Thanks...hi shraya,
u create a query report by SQVI, joining the BSEG and BKPF table.
from BKPF u will get document type (KA), and from BSEg u will get the purchasing doc number.... -
Downpayment adjust against Multiple Invoice
Hello Expets..
I need your valuable suggestion for this scenario. Like Customer is paying Downpayment against salesOrder. That Down payment had to adjust in basis of collection. For ex Downpayment is for 100 and Total outstanding Bill is for ex 1000 then when collection is 500 then 50% down payment should get adjusted. I mean base on collection amount % the down payment % shoudl get adjusted..
How can we map this is into SAP
your help will b appriaciated..
Thanks a lot
Regards
PoojaPooja
I didnt get any logic behind your senario.
Any way i think its cannot be maped in SAP . Only at the time of clearing Down payment manually we have to do.
Jain -
Capital Excise Invoice with Import PO
Dear All,
I came acorss with 1 strange thing in case of Excise invoice capture against capital Import purchase order. The excise transaction type is GRPO & sub transaction type is IP.
If u post the excise invoice with GRPO for capital import PO then systen passes correct FI entry i.e. 50% on cenvat account & 50% on hold account in case of AED But if u select GRPO with IP ( Sub Trasnsaction) then system pass 100% entry in cenvat account for AED
What would be the reason ?
Please help me out. Thanks in advanceHI,
GeneralySUB Trans type is used to post to seperate G/L acct.This AED for import as per excise law 100% can be availed.For normal PO only 50%.So pleasev check in
TAXON GM>Acct det>Speify excise acct per ex trans> whether u have specified sub transaction type IP cenvat offset acct.Based on the acct entry happens in J1IEX.U have SAP note 964190
MURUGAN -
Capital Goods Transfer of Credit
Hi
Our client want to process to pass the manual jv against capital goods through T/code J1IH (under addl.excise & RG23C for only part2). After post the doc, they want to process to post the doc for 50% Capital Hold amt (previous yr.) to Capital Goods amt through T/code J2I8. But the line was showing as deactivate mode.
Pls help me how overcome the said problem.
Regards
Avijit
Edited by: Avijit Barman on Jun 25, 2008 6:28 AMHi Manoj,
Thanks for your response.
This is the first time i am using J2I8 T code for transfer of credit.
The particular SAP note has not been applied so far.
I will apply the same and if any problem existing, will let you know.
Thanks
Regards
Rifaie.M -
Setup for Down Payment made to the Vendor for Capital Assets(Otherthan AUC)
Hello,
Can any one explain how we can make down payments to vendors against capital assets and what setup is required for this.
Plz advice.Hi,
At the time of making down payment to vendor under capital assets purchase specify the purchase order number. For this vendor reconcialtion account and down payment special g/l symbol should assign first in OBYR.
There u can choose the special gl indicators.
Hope this is helpful, if yes assign points.
Regards,
Sankar -
Milestone Billing with DownPayment Clearing
Hi folks,
I have a problem that the Downpayment made by the customer and posted through transaction F-29 is not being shown as the second line item (below the actual billing item). Actually as per the SAP documentation "those payments already made are taken into the billing document as items to be cleared. They are set as items, after the billing items to which they refer, in the billing document"....However in my case , this is not happening. The other alternative is clearing the downpayment against the billing item through FI using F-39, which though works fine, is still a round-about way, hence can somebody help me with my problem. I'm sure somebody from you experts may have come across this problem. Pls note that all the settings in SD and FI as explained in the documentation ahve been done and are working fine, except the above feature.This problem "was because in the Accounting settings of "Reconciliation accounts (A/R, A/P)" [OB14], the sales order field was suppressed. After unhiding this field, it started working fine as this is the field whch forms the link between the Downpayment recieved in the Accounting to be affected as a subsequent line item in the Billing Document.
-
Hi Gurus,
If we make PO based downpayment of Rs 100000 to a vendor.
There is an invoice related to this PO of 40000 and there is one invoice related other PO of 30000.
So, While running APP, system should block payment for 40000 and should make payment for 30000, as we have already recieved downpayment against the invoice/PO.
But system is not blocking the payment.
Please revert asap.
Thank YouHere's how the down payment works:
Down Payment Request
Down Payment
Post Invoice
Down Payment Clearing
Payment Run
Down Payment Request (F-47) is not part of double entry book keeping.
During Down Payment (F110), make sure that the payment run is programmed to pick up Special G/L items.
Post Invoice (FB60/MIRO) - Invoice for the whole amount
Down Payment Clearing (F-54) - The down payment posted to the Alt Recon Account is now moved to the Recon Account.
Payment Run (F110) - The remanining balance in the Recon account is now paid.
Please check the below link for additional info:
http://help.sap.com/bestpractices/BBLibrary/Documentation/J03_AP_BPP_01_EN_MY.doc -
Downpayment related issue in FM
Hi everyone,
We are on ECC 6, using update profile 102 (we have no overrides currently). Our scenario is this:
PO -> downpayment against the PO -> payment of the downpayment amt -> Goods receipt -> Invoice receipt -> Clear downpmt against invoice -> pay the vendor the remaining amount.
This process seems to work fine when all these events happen within the same FY; however when some or all of these events are between fiscal years, the actuals to encumbrance data is off.
The client would like the expense to be recognized NOT BEFORE the goods receipt (based on our current scenario above, expense is recognized at the time of the payment of the down pmt). While they dont want the expense to be recognized before goods receipt, they want the advance pmt to be left as an encumbrance against the PO.
Can someone tell me how this can be done? Also, are there any implications of doing this between fiscal years?
Please help.
Thanks,
PSMHi PSM, check the note 741971, it could be useful for your scenario.
Best regards
César -
Report S_ALR_87013536: display actual/downpayements
Hello All,
I have an issue where downpayments made against the PO does not reflect in the report S_ALR_87013536.
PO is been created with the WBS as referance.
when i check in the PO , i could find the downpayments values.
My question is , to get this downpayment values in the above report is it neceaasry that while making a downpayment against a PO , one has to mention the WBS as the referance?
if no...are there any way i can make these values displayed in the above report
Please let me know.
Thanks and regards
Sandeep.Hello AP,
thanks for your response,
but i did not get you. Can you please elaborate on this.
Thanks and regards
Sandeep
Maybe you are looking for
-
ISight "Camera in use" error!
When using iChat or Photobooth the iSight camera is always reported as "The Camera is in use by another application". This is not true as iChat is the first item I open after a fresh startup. I have looked far and wide on the Apple support site and v
-
How can
-
Nokia E90 firmware download problem
Hi - I'm trying to update my Nokia E90 firmware from 210.34.75 to 300.34.84 and the 81.9MB file downloads perfectly (in under 3 minutes) until it gets to 60.3MB and then stops. Any ideas? I've un-installed the entire PC Suite and its add-ons, an no l
-
I'm having a confusing issue with reconnecting media. I just moved a lot of my media from the desktop to an external hard drive. Now when I open a project, I get message: "385 files offline", but it only lists about 20 files for me to reconnect. Then
-
I sync all my calendars (iPhone, iPad, and three Macs) with an Exchange server at work. It works fine except for one annoying quirk which only occurs on the iPad. I generally use week view, and almost always, some number of entries are tranparent. I