Downpayment message

Dear Friends,
When i am posting down payment with reference to PO i am using a different vendor rather than the vendor in PO.
It is giving only warning message.
When I am posting down payment amount more than PO value then also system is giving warning message
Can anyone adivise how to get these two message are as error messages.
Thanks
Balu

Hi
I have used in OBA5 even though it is not working.
Thanks
Balu

Similar Messages

  • PO Number in Vendor Downpayment - Message Control

    Dears
    We have a requirement to enter the PO number in the line item while entering vendor down payment using F-48 transaction.
    We cannot make the PO order number in the F-48 mandatory. However, if the PO number is not entered by the user,
    a warning message should be issued to the user that PO number is not entered.
    Can we control it through changing message control ?
    Please advise.

    Hello Nikitha,
    You can achieve your requirement either through validation or with the help of creating the screen variant.
    Please check the below links which are helpful to resolve your issue.
    http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-29078
    http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-39405
    http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-46554
    Please check this and try accordingly. Revert us if you still face any issues.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Lakshmi S

  • Message No.AA571 downpayment posting not possible

    Hi Experts,
    In FBL1n I have invoice and Advances payment of asset (SPL GL). Advance is full amount of invoice amount. When I want to transfer the downpayment from f-54 while saving the document I get the above error. Down payment does not exist.  Pl help
    Even though invoice and advance payment and in open items (red mark).
    In downpayment account the downpayment also exist.
    Pl help
    Thanx in advance

    Dear Shymala,
    first of all, please recalculate values via AS02.
    If an amount is displayed concerning Downpayments it means that you
    have cleared on the order more downpayments than dowpayments posted
    so error is displayed correctly
    Check on the affected asset in AW01N for transaction with transactions
    types 180 and 181 for a confirmation.
    If the down payment on the internal order is correct, what you could
    do is to post a manual down payment on the asset in order to balance
    the down payments on this asset (trx ABSO).
    Please review this.
    Check also note 860038. If error AA571 is displayed due to the reasons
    mentioned in the note you can set the message to as a warning:
    - "This should only be permitted in the cases where a negative down
    payment balance cannot be avoided due to foreign currency rounding".
    - "This does not apply to AUCs (assets under construction) for
    investment measures."
    I hope this can help.
    Mauri

  • Error message VF 217 when creating downpayment request in VF01

    Dear Experts,
    We use milestone billing. I did all the necessary settings in customizing.
    Here is an example for a billing plan
    billing date    date description   billing rule   date category billing type
    28.02.2010  0009                      5                 04                   FAZ
    28.03.2010  0008                      3                 02
    When I create a FAZ (downpayment request) in VF01 or VF04, SAP says "check the log" . In the log I get the error message VF 217 "For downpayment requirements, only billing rule 4 or 5 can be used". If I check the item data of e.g. item 10 the billing rule is indeed "5". So I wonder, why I get this error message in the first place. Do you have any idea, how I can supress this error message?
    If I create the FAZ manually via VF01/VF04, I get this message, but I can still save and process the FAZ without any problems.
    But we need to create the FAZ via the POS interface (Retail). So when the interface gets this error message, it actually thinks that the FAZ can't be created. This is causing us problems. Therefore we need to supress the error message.
    Thanks a lot in advance!

    Hi Mueller,
    I think in that case the problem is in billing rule in billing plan type.
    Goto OVBJ--> select billing plan type (For ex. 01 - Milestone Billing) --> Please maintain billing rule 4 or 5 --> save it.
    In downpayment
    Option 4, We use for % based,
    Option 5, We use for value basis
    After doing thi change, I think your issue will get resolved.
    Please try and revert back with your findings.
    Regards,
    MT
    Edited by: M T on Feb 28, 2010 9:11 PM

  • Pop up message during MIRO when Downpayment exist for the Vendor

    A Vendor is already having Downpayment of some amount, while doing Invoice Verification (MIRO) for this vendor one Pop up message is coming "X Currency Name of Company Vendor Account Group Exist".
    In this case when the downpayment amount is Rs. 100, Currency is EUR, Description of Vendor Account Group is Third Party Vendor & Company name XY, the pop up message is coming as "100 EUR XY Third Party Vendor Exist".
    While Checking the message through SE91, the message(F5096), the  description is written as "&&& exist".
    Why the message is not coming like this, "100 EUR Downpayment exist".
    I want to know where the setting lies.
    Nalini Kanta Das

    milkmansrevenge wrote:
    I have since tried to make a JOptionPane appear in a seperate thread Not good since all Swing GUI components must be called on one thread only, the EDT. I'd recommend either creating a JOptionPane as a JDialog (the API will show you how) or just create a JDialog, and show either one in a non-modal way using a Swing Timer to dispose of them when a time period is up.
    for example:
            JOptionPane optPane = new JOptionPane("This is my message");
            // here FooFrame is the enclosing JFrame.  This needs to be changed
            final JDialog dialog = optPane.createDialog(FooFrame.this, "Dialog Title");
            dialog.setModalityType(ModalityType.MODELESS);
            dialog.setVisible(true);
            int duration = 2000;
            Timer swingTimer = new Timer(duration, new ActionListener()
              public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent arg0)
                if (dialog != null && dialog.isVisible())
                  dialog.dispose();
            swingTimer.setRepeats(false);
            swingTimer.start();Edited by: Encephalopathic on Mar 29, 2009 3:23 PM

  • Posting Vendor Downpayment requests with input tax

    Hi Gurus,
    I am trying to configure the down payment request for Vendor Payments, I want these down payment request to be posted so I un flagged the Noted Items check box and flagged the check box Commitments warnings check box and also I entered the Account determination key for Input tax clearing. Alternative GL account is defined to allow the Input Tax.
    Now the problem is, when I try to post the Down payment request document with input tax I get an error message stating that "Down pmnts with taxes are not permitted when processing with jur.code".  Actually the input tax is being assigned automatically even if I don’t use a tax code.
    So, can any one help me to understand what am I missing in my configuration or is it some thing which cannot be processed using F-47.
    Oh by the way I am using the Special GL indication F (down payment request).
    Thanks
    Shilpa

    Nicole,
    Which country is this requirement for?  As far as I know, there is no tax incidence on downpayment.  Input tax arises only when you receive the invoice, right?  Not when you receive a downpayment.

  • Error doing outgoing payment against A/P Downpayment Request

    Hi,
    I am working on SAP B1 8.8 PL00(evaluation version). While posting Outgoing Payment against A/P Downpayment Request,system  displays following error message-'Invalid Account Code'. It happens for both the payment means-Check as well as Cash. In G/L Account Determination -Purchase Tab-General Tab I have assigned G/L account to 'Down Payment Tax Offset Account'. Also in BP Master following accounts have been assigned-1.Accounts Payable 2.Down Payment Clearing Account.
    What could be the reason of the error?Please guide me.
    Regards
    Sudhir

    Dear Sudhir Jadhav,
    Apart from the accounts that you have mentioned there is also the Down Payment Interim Account in the General Tab of the Purchasing and Sales tab of the G/L Account Determination.
    I have tested the creation of the payment for the Down Payment and at first I could not add it because of an account issue. When I added this account it worked.
    Regards,
    Marcella Rivi
    SAP Business One Forums Team

  • Error Message no. FICUSTOM098

    Dear Experts
    I am getting the below error while posting the downpayment in FB01 T.code, my client doesn't want to use the F-48 to make the down payment. so i used the FB01 down payment since parking & posting option is available for FB01.
    No Funds Management invoice reference in the document splitting data
    Message no. FICUSTOM098
    Diagnosis
    You have activated the online payment update in Funds Management and are posting a document for which the FM invoice reference is not set in document splitting.
    Procedure
    This message normally only occurs for errors in system configuration. These include:
    Using incorrect financial transactions (for example, financial transaction 50 for open item-managed accounts)
    Incorrect customizing for document splitting
    This message should only be ignored in extreme emergencies. Even if the document can still be posted, the error that occurred will cause problems later on, such as:
    Missing updates of follow-on documents
    Termination when posting payment documents
    Regards
    Anil

    Hi Anil,
    Please check if the SAP correction Notes below are valid to your current release/package:
    1571597 FICUSTOM088 for FI clearing lines
    1621286 FICUSTOM098 for postings with financial transactions 30-50
    1634237 FICUSTOM098 erscheint beim Buchen vorerfasster Belege nicht
    1566669 Error FICUSTOM098 in FI transfer postings(30-90)
    1553089 Message FICUSTOM98 displayed in error
    1561611 Message FICUSTOM98 displayed in error
    1568902 FICUSTOM098 during goods receipt
    It can resolve your issue.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • Clearing some payments: messages

    Gurus
    i am struggling to clear some payments. "type" ZP
    when i run FBl1n with special GL, i am getting 2 entries with status in red.
    we dont want it in the display, hence i try to clear them.
    since its done loong back, the user doesnt remember whether there was any invoice.
    anyways, i went to f-54 to clear the down payments.
    1) first vendor: in vendor A, i can go in without an invoice number( as i dont know the number, may be it doesnt even have one),
    i didnt want to proceed in production box as i didnt know wtherther i can still clear it without invoice number.
    I tried in Quality though. i went to f-54 , gave doc date, type "KA" and entered in, for the message "correct the items", I selected the blue color line entered text and pressed save,
    now when i run FBl1n for this, i am able to see this new document in normal items and the old one is gone from G/L( is this fine?).
    but still this new one is in open and with staus red, however it does show in normal items.
    i suppose i moved from sepcial to normal. now i think i shoudl go to f-44 and clear vendor.
    is this correct? before i do it in Production i want to confirm.
    is this ok without an invoice number? is this is how for cases where ther is no invoice for that payment. please confirm the steps.
    2) second vendor:
    there is one more vendor B
    for this i went to f-54 to proceed teh same way. but it says no downpayment docs for this.
    then in MR11 we cheked if there is an open GR/IR. it does exist.
    hence we tried to clear it in the same way like other docs which we generally do. go to MIRO, post an invoice and later clear this downpayment with f-44.
    But in MIRO, it gave an information message "downpayments for NNN PO exists".
    i think we shoudl go ahead, post this and clear the downpayments for this. but i dont see any downpayments in F-54 for this vendor.
    Howver, this docuemtn still shows up in Special G/L. are there any other kind i need to check which are Special g/l.
    how to check and proceed now. i want this line to be taken off from fbl1n display. it needs to be cleared.
    are we clearign it fine? if no downpayments were there, why is that info message? where else can i check if anythign exists for thsi and clear it. and ofcourse hwo i should clear.
    i hope  i have made it clear whats going on.
    Please help.
    regards
    kavana

    Guys,
    can u help me out.
    i underdtand i need to use F-54 to clear down payments.
    after clearign it against an invoice do i need to still go to f-44 and clear there?
    and what if there was no invoice for that downpayment?
    another vendor; when its just a special G/l entry but no downpayment for that, can i simply create an invoice go to f-44 and clear it?
    whats teh difference bet f-54 and f-44 and after f-54 is it must to use f-44.
    please let me know.
    thanks alot,

  • Error message while doing the Vendor Clearing

    Dear Team,
    I am encountering an issue while doing the Vendor clearing.I am nullifying the Vendor down payment against to RE document through residual posting system is showing the message like the below.
    No additional posting to asset
    Message no. AA 444
    Diagnosis
    A downpayment was already posted to the asset 80567 0 in the currently displayed document. Additional posting to the same asset in this document is not possible for technical reasons.
    Procedure
    Combine the two downpayments into one.
    Please kindly advice.The concern Down payment is showing under open item in FBL1N.Kindly advice how to proceed further.
    Thanks for the consideration.
    Regards,
    Suma.

    Hi Suma,
    First clear Down payment with using of F-54 & next you can clear normal OI.
    Rgds
    SumaMani

  • Error message in down payment on asset purchase order

    Hello,,
    While i am trying to make down payment request with reference to PO have asset number it is return an error message
    *Store a cost element for credit down payments
        Message no. KI165
    Diagnosis
        You posted a payment to a CO-relevant object (cost center, order, and so
        on). The payment is therefore recorded in CO.
        If a payment has no order reference, no consumption account can be
        derived. Therefore, CO posts the payment under a default cost element
        created and stored during Customizing.
        You have not yet maintained this default in the system.
    Procedure
        Maintain the default cost and revenue elements in the Implementation
        Guide under "Project System" for controlling area CA00.*
    I don`t know what is the reason for using this cost element and which type of cost elements that i can use in this issue....
    We are not use Down payment clearing account, because Our customer don`t need this account..
    Please help me ASAP
    Thanks for your cooperation
    Hussein

    Hello Hussein,
    For error message KI165,please maintanin default cost  element in OKEP.Down payments have to be posted in CO with cost   elements. In case of purchase orders (or open items in CO), the cost  element for consumption can be derived from the purchase order. Thus the  down payment in CO is posted with the consumption cost element.                                                                               
    If the  down payment does not have any reference to a purchase order, then the cost element for which the consumption will be posted is not known.  In this case, the cost element maintained with OKEP is used.                     
    The error message KI165 will occur if no cost element is maintained with  OKEP - not regarding whether the actual down payment has a reference to  a purchase order and thus will update in CO under the consumption cost element derived from the purchase order.  This is always a  source of  misunderstanding - but I hope it is clear now.                                                                               
    OKEP configuration is absolutely necessary if you do not have  a cost element assigned at the time of downpayment request creation.                                                                               
    If after maintaining the default cost element you get some other error  then please note that you would need to check the following :                                                                               
    1.Compare the configuration settings for the GL accounts that are  used for posting the cash call in EHP4 system with the system without the EHP4 support pack.               
    2.Check the controlling area settings in both the systems.        
    Regards Bernhard

  • Not able to Post downpayment document to accounting.

    Hi Gurus,
    I am facing problem at the time of posting an downpayment request to accounting for few of the service materials.
    The error is as follows in details,
    ======================================
    No VAT registration numbers are allowed for down payments/requests
    Message no. FS229
    Diagnosis
    You entered a tax code for a down payment or down payment request which is defined as an EC tax code.  This is not permitted, since this posting is not subject to EC tax.  A tax statement requirement exists upon the delivery of goods to a foreign EC country, but not, however, upon receipt of the down payment.
    System Response
    The system does not allow the tax code.
    Procedure
    Use a different tax code or EC-identifier.
    ===========================================
    What changes for TAX configuration I need to carry out to remove this error.
    Thanks
    Regards
    Vinod Naik

    Hi,
    Check if any of the condition types which has the account is having a tax code.. That tax code shouldn't have defined as EC tax code.
    When you double click on the line item condition type which will be posted to accounts, you could see the G/L account and tax code. Ask you FI consultant to check how that tax code has been defined.
    Btw, it is always good if you open a new thread.. But you can refer the old thread inside your post.
    Regards, Sai Krishna.

  • Downpayment - invoice blocked for FI

    Hello SD experts,
    I have a problem in downpayment process when the amount of customer's advance payment is bigger than amount on final invoice. For example: customer paid 25.000 in advance, I posted downpayment and then final invoice is issued only for 23.000. So, we can say we should return to customer 2.000.
    Here is how we enter documents in SAP:
    1. Sales order for downpayment request is created (with billing plan). We put one item (for example service) with price 25.000.
    2. Downpayment request (invoice) is created.
    3. We post downpayment to FI (25.000).
    4. We create final invoice
    On final invoice additional item is automatically added by SAP. Additional item is downpayment settlement. By default both items get same price (value), that is 25.000.
    As I said, I want to charge customer only 23.000. So, I change the amount for first item from 25.000 to 23.000. As soon as I do this and save the document, it becomes blocked and accounting document is not created.
    It can't be released to FI because I get notice about difference between values of two items on invoice.
    My question is: Do we have the process correctly set up ? Are we entering documents in the right way ?
    Another thing – if I look at the printout, I think is ok. I have a line that says that amount to be paid is -2.000 (cusotmer paid more).
    In other cases, if received advance is same or smaller then the final amount, there aren't any problems with blocked invoices.
    Thank you for help,
    RJ

    HI CB,
    While posting a invoice by MIRO, if you come across the following message as block for payment than it is because of Three way matching. You can see three way matching status in purchase order status tab in transaction code ME23N and in purchase order history in item detail.
    Generally invoice is blocked for payment because of two issues:-
    u2022 Price difference: - Price in invoice is higher than purchase order (above tolerance limit).
    u2022 Quantity difference: - Quantity in MIRO is higher than MIGO (or good receipt).
    Once invoice is blocked for payment you need to release it for payment via transaction code MRBR. For next time while posting an invoice through MIRO you should post invoice within tolerance limit.
    You can display and change tolerance limit for invoice verification in customizing with help of transaction code OMR6.
    Regards,
    Anand

  • Downpayment Against Capital PO

    Dear All,
    I defined Down payment Clearing Account in AO90 but i want to know which tyoe of GL account I should maintain for down payment clearing.
    Please help me.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Mahendra Gupta

    please check the configuration of your downpayment at transaction AO73 (Activate capitalize fix asset).
    Also, you should make sure you define the relevant G/L accounts to post downpayment.
    ->goto t/c:AO90
    define down payment accounts for AuC asset class
    Acq. downpayment
    downpayment clearing
    Basically in the customizing, you should define down payment accounts for AuC asset class:
    Acq. downpayment      -> should be asset reconciliation account.
    downpayment clearing  -> this is a normal GL account(not AA rec.account
    The postings are like follows:
    F-48 downpayment
    50  Bank         100-
    29A vendor     100  (field status set,asset 'option')
    70  asset         100    <-   Acq. downpayment account in Ao90 invoice
    31  vendor       200-
    70  asset         200
    F-54 clearing invoice
    39A  vendor      100-    <- clearing downpayment
    26   vendor        100
    75   asset          100-    <- clearing downpayment Asset
    40   clearing      100     <- clearing 'downpayment clearing account'
    In summary, you can avoid the error as follows:
              1. Filling the missing account in AO85 or AO90       OR
              2. reversing the down payments of the orders.
    The functionality down-payment in asset module is designed as what you have seen. Normally it posts to an AuC first in down-payment and then reverse it in invoice clearing (F-54).
    Please also refer to the attached note 310368 solution 2:
    "2.If, for some reason, you do not want to do this, but this scenario is
    essential for your accounting, then contact SAP remote consulting. A
    solution will accompany a modification which cannot be supported by
    SAP support."
    Please see the following note:
      762526  Depreciation on down payment clearing: Transaction
    Unfortunately it is not possible to turn error AA866 into a warning message.
    I hope this information helps.

  • F-48- Downpayement related to downpayment request and enhancements for PO

    Hi to all,
    Is there anyone that can explain me why in F-48 transaction, when I make a downpayment related to downpayment request, in the subsequent screen the fields are filled with the value retrieve from previous screen ( in which I selected the downpayent request related to DP I'm posting) all fields except the purchase order field that remains NOT filled ("space" ). So it should be filled by the user. I was asked to find a substitution in order to make this field automatically filled with the correct value without the user needs to fill it manually . The problem is that purchase order field seems to be related to another field called LPN (Long Procuerement Number ). Anyone can suggest a suitable enhancement for substitution ?
    Thanks in advance...
    Andrew

    Thanks Tejas sir, AND VV sir,
    Sri Problem resolved.  But sir, we want while F-47 payment request special GL Indicator A in both case in F-48 too.. spl GL Indicator A only. while doing the same thing getting error.. see the error Below.
    Special G/L indicator A is not defined for down payments
    Message no. F5053
    Diagnosis
    The specified special G/L indicator is not classified as "down payment" or not listed in the list of the target special G/L indicators for indicator "F".
    System Response
    The entry is not accepted.
    Procedure
    Enter an allowed special G/L indicator or initiate a change of the default settings.
    Kindly help me sir.
    Thanks
    Pranav Kr. Gupta
    Note: i will give u the point. as well sir.

Maybe you are looking for