DP90-BILLING REQUEST-HOURS ROUNDING OFF ISSUE
Hi,
We are having the following process flow
Sales order-Service order-Confirmation of service order operations-DP90-Biling request-Invoice to customer.
In this for example if I confirm for 3.5 hrs in service order,Iam getting 3.5 hrs in the actual data in DP90 and when I convert this in to billing request,its getting reflected as 4 HRS(ROUNDING OFF TO THE NEAREST SINGLE DIGIT).What could be the reason for this.Pl suggest.
Regards
A.Sureshbabu
Hi Sureshbabu,
Is this related to a specific material? If yes, then you can check if the related material has a rounding profile.
Also check the setting for the field "Conversion quantity" in the DIP profile setting: ODP1.
Regards
Nikhilesh
Similar Messages
-
Rounding off Issue (Net Value not equal to Net Price * quantity)
Dear Gurus,
Here is an interesting issue.The default calculation done in the pricing procedure is two decimal places.Now we consider a real scneario,consider the net value of 324 quantities of an item calculated is 36,049.86 .When it is divided by quantity the resulting value of net price is 111.265 but the system shows 111.27 by rounding it off.
Now here comes the problem,my client needs the rate to be shown on the order script to be two decimal places and the net value should be equal quantity * net price.So if we apply this,
324 * 111.27 = 36051.48
But the net value calculated by the system is 36,049.86.So it can be consluded that:
"Quantity * Net Price Shown is not Equal to Net Value calculated by the System"
Need an urgent resolution,project is stuck on this
Regards,
Sam Ahmed
Edited by: Lakshmipathi on Nov 3, 2011 12:14 PM
Please dont add URGENT in subject or in your postHere is the pricing procedure,
We start with the amount condition types
Unit Price Units Condition Value
ZMRP MRP 1,700.00 10 PAC 55,080.00
ZTRP Trade Price 1,445.00 10 PAC 46,818.00
ZDPR Dist. Price 1,445.00 10 PAC 46,818.00 (GL)
Using Trade Price we apply the product discount of 23%
ZPRD Product Discount 23.000- % 10,768.14-
Then we send discount amount to the gl by using condition type ZDIS
ZDIS Discount Value 100.000- % 10,768.14- (GL)
tHE RESULTING NET VALUE IS 36,049.86 as 46818.00 - 10,768.14
Order Item value 111.27 1 PAC 36,049.86
And the Net Price is 111.27 -
Dear SAP Members,
My end user facing a issue while entering the sale order.The scenario is,For a item say 'X',its quantity is 24,unit price is 41.15,discount is 8%,then the total amount (ie)Total (LC) should be 908.59, but the system shows as 908.64.Why I'm getting this issue.
I have given Rounding Method by currency.
Display settings as:
Amount-2
Price-2
Rates-4
Quantities-2
Percent-6
Units-2
Currency settings:
Rounding Method-Round to one.
Decimals-Default
I have tried all possibilities in test database but still I'm facing the same issue..
Please give me solution to solve this issue.
With Regards,
RevathyThe software's logic is as follows it calculates the unit price after discount then times that rounded amount to the quantity. That is also why there is net unit price on the row level if you look in the DB. You could do a manual adjustment on the total but that will play abound with the discount a bit. Business one logic is very relational and because of the cascading of header tables and row level tables the calculations are not intuitive to most users. But on the upside you are guarantee consistent rounding by the software across the board.
-
Rounding off in billing doc for % based milestone billing
Hi,
I am working with milestone that is % based. I already have condition type DIFF in the pricing procedure. The rounding off is taking place in sales order. But, milestone value is not being rounded neither at sales order item level nor at billing level. For Example (a single item order):
Total value of the sales order item : 150.30
Sales order item value after rounding off: 150.00
Milestones :
1. 15% - 22.50
2. 60% - 90.00
3. 25% - 37.50
The same amount is going to billing and no rounding off takes place at the billing level or milestone level.
Can any tell me how this can be done so that only rounded off figure is accounting.
The condition type setting is standard. No changes made. (The pricing also has Req 13, calty 16 basty 4.). Also the copy control order to billing has Pricing type K.
Regards,
MuneshHi,
I think we have Rounding off tick in billing document back ground screen or on your condition type back ground screen please check . I dont have SAP to check.
Thanks,
T.Nishanth -
Issue in MODVAT Clearing Account and Rounding off of Excise.
I have one issue in MODVAT Clearing Account and Rounding off of Excise.
Example:
Material cost 100Rs.
Excise value
1. BED 10.5 Rs
2. ECes 2.1 Rs
3. HEces 1.3.Rs
At the time of GR
Material Ac Dr 100
To GR/IR 100
At the time of Excise Capture
We done the rounding of Excise value
RG23 A BED 11
RG23 A Eces 2
RG23 A HEces 1
To MODVAT 14
At the time of IR . System create IR with reference of PO
GR/IR DR 100
MODVAT 13.9
To Vendor 113.9
So here you can see that there is a difference of 0.1 in MODVAT account and hence we are crediting Vendor with the lesser amount here with 0.1 RS.
So we cannot reconcile the MODVAT Account
Less Payment to vendor by 0.1 Rs
So is there any solutions on that.
regards
Shayam
Edited by: Shayam_210 on Jan 3, 2011 7:08 AM
Edited by: Shayam_210 on Jan 3, 2011 7:09 AMHi,
Check the rounding setting in below:-
SPRO > Logistics - General > Tax on Goods Movements > India > Basic Settings > Maintain Company Code Settings
SPRO > General Settings > Currencies > Define rounding rules for currencies
Regards,
Gaurav -
Rounding off error between stock transport order and GR (Quantity)
Hello,
I would appreciate your help in an issue. Our customer uses stock transfer order in which a conversion rule was set. Since the transport company requires another unit, the purchase order is created in ton but MIGO is done with Megawatt Hour. SAP takes into consideration only three digits after comma. Therefore, a rounding off error occurs which can only be seen in MB52 but not in the transitsaldo MB5T. The difference or the missing quantity (i.e. 0,001 MH which is 0,0000xxx TON) can not be found and thus a GR can not be posted in MIGO either.
If you have any idea how to solve this or if there is any OSS message on this, please post on this thread. I am waiting for your comments.
Thanks,
EsraHi Ram Prasad,
The note you suggested is very useful. I need to download the correction. When I use movement types
557/558, I got the error that the transit saldo exceeded xxx MWH.
PO = TON
GI = 2,159 MWH
GR = 2,157 MWH which corresponds to 0,459 TON
Conversion rule= 1 TON = 4,7 MWH
Do you know how to book 0,002 MWH away with these scrapping mov.types? This quantity is missing and is not shown in MB5T because this list functions with TON as far as I figured it out.
Thanks a lot for your help.
Esra Nilsson -
How to create a billing request for service order that has serv contract?
Dear Experts,
Can you please help me?
The scenario is, my client has service contracts with their customer but they want to charge customers not periorically but as and when they provide service (ad-hoc).
So how to bill the customer in this case?
In my testing if I have a service contract (order type = SC) then when I create service order, system automatically picks up standard order type SM01. (which is service order with contract.)
And when I perform time confirmation and material consumption (goods issue), actual costs gets booked to the service order. However, using the service order number as referece, if I try to create a billing request in DP90, system create a blank billing request with no line items.
So, could you please advice, how can I create a billing request for a service order, if I have a contract?
Appreciate your help.
Best regards,
Abdul RafeyHi Praveen,
Thank you very much for your reply. I appreciate your time and efforts.
Ok, these are the steps how I have executed the process.
- I have created a service contract for an equipment. In the service contract, I have maintained the service material in the line item, maintained price and assigned equipment in the technical objects.
- I created service notification, which automatically picked up contract.
- When I create service order, from notification screen, system automatically picked up correct order type SM01 (Service order with contract).
- Then I planned operations and spare parts in the service order.
- Checked settlement rule in the service order is SDI.
- released and saved service order.
- Using IW42, in SAP ECC6, you can perform both time confirmation and material consumption using the same screen and also TECO service order. System issues message to say, goods issue have been posted.
- when you check the document flow of service order, you can see operations posted, and also goods issue posted.
- check cost tab to see actual costs. (if I want to settle costs from service order to service contract, I can do so w/o a problem in KO88)
- Use DP90, enter service order number and create billing request. System takes to billing request screen but it is blank. No line items.
- So, since there is a contract, in this case, am I meant to be creating the billing request from Service contract? instead of from Service order?
I hope I have clarified myself better this time.
Best regards,
Abdul Rafey -
Hi,
I'm playing a little bit with the trial version of Numbers, just to see if my good old Ti is still capable to run it properly before buying a full license of iWorks.
By the way, it seems like there's some kind of round-off error. Try to build a series as follows: enter -10 in to a cell, then let Numbers build the series using the usual formula "previous cell value - 0.1". Apply a format so that only two decimal values are visible. Drag the formula and build twenty values (just to have some values). Now use the previous series and calculate its squared values. Then select some cells in the squared values column, starting from the first one: as soon as you include the squared value of -9.3 in the selection you will see that the data inspector will show a min value equal to 86.4900000000001 , which should be the squared value of +/- 9.3.
Now, try to subtract 86.49 to that cell and you will see that the result is not exactly zero: you can try to calculate the inverse of it and, instead of an error, you get a very big (actually, not that big!) number.
You can easily reproduce this weird behavior if you open Calculator and calculate the squared value of 9.3: until you set the precision up to 14, you get the correct value, you select precision >= 15, you get the round off value.
So, it seems it is not a Numbers only related problem.
Just for the record, I've just calculated the same value into Octave, and the result is correct (and different):
86.4900000000000 (Octave)
86.4900000000001 (Numbers)
Yet not so serious, this kind of "numerical noise" might lead to annoying issues...HI SIR,
WE CREATED ONE PO .IN THAT PO ITEM NO2 SHOWING NET VALUE AS 11.63 FOR MATERIAL CS PLATE WHER AS ITEM NO 5 SHOWING NET VALUE AS 11.62 FOR SAME MATERIAL AND SAME PRICING CONDITIONS.
Hi ,
Please check in item conditions whether have you entered discount conditions in line itenm 5.
Regards,
Vijay -
Need rounding off value for partial Goods receipt
Hi,
My requirement is that the PO value,PO tax value ,GR value and Invoice value(IR) should get rounded off.
When I am using the PO value which is rounded off in PO, but at the time of posting partial goods receipt the value for the GR/IR clearing or the stock value is not getting rounded off for these G/ls.
What should I do for this to get the rounded off values in GR.
Regards,
GorakshHi Goraksh,
The problem is that the pricing (incl. the rule 17) is not normally called at the time of GR. As Jürgen wrote, the system just uses the "net value" field of the PO.
I have however a "wild" idea. If the price in the PO comes from the info record or from a contract (and not changed manually there), then you can set the "pricing date category" = 5 there, meaning "GR date". This causes the pricing to be called again at the time of GR and your formula 17 will fire.
The side effect of course is that the price that you had in the PO, printed and sent to the vendor will not be binding: if you change the PIR price before the GR, the GR will be posted to the new PIR price, despite the fact that the PO printout showed something else. So the question is if the price printed on the PO is indeed binding in your business case - in many business cases it is the current vendor price that matters for the billing by the vendor, not the one that you prined on the PO. For such business cases you should have had pricing date category 5 anyway...
BR
Raf -
Billing request? or Resource Related billing?
Hi,
Please read the real life SD - FICO scenario given below and if you think you have the solution, kindly state your suggestion. Would be much appreciated.
===================================================
Engineering Services Orders (Inter-company)
Process Steps (As-is)
1.Purchase Order is received in Co. A via EDI, from Co. B
2.Sales Order (services) is automatically generated in Co. A. It has item 10 as hours and item 20 as travel expenses in $ amount
Sales accounting creates settlement rule and internal order number and advises the engineers who will provide the services
3.Later on, engineers report actual hours for services rendered, by using CATS system This merely reports data in SAP system but does not make an FI posting
They use the order number advised to them in step 2 to create an internal order
4 Actual travel expenses are added by Payroll - as a direct posting to FI
5. Periodic CATS batch job is carried out by relevant IT person, to settle costs to an internal order (not to sales order). These costs are labor hours and travel expenses
6. FICO personnel then do transaction K08G to settle internal order --> sales order
7. (Manual Step) Sales Accounting then runs report KVBI to view and select data related to service orders The data is downloaded to an Excel worksheet and handed over to SD-Billing.
8. (Manual step) The cost data in dollar figures is converted to hours by SD-Billing, dividing cost data with rate / hour given in the sales order condition record
9. SD-Billing creates invoice. Since it is order-related invoice, it has open quantities coming in from the order. These are now manually over-written / replaced with the actual data from step 7 & 8. An invoice is thus, generated for each order individually.
Process (To-be)
To create an interim document (billing request?) to replace manual steps 7 and 8. This interim document needs to capture actual cost data form the system and also show the remaining / open quantities from the sales order
QUESTION: what is the best route to go?
Configure a Billing Request document (by modifying a standard Credit Memo Request / Debit Memo Request) or
Going via the route of resource-related billing?Refer to the document: J48 - Project with Intercompany Billing
Link: http://help.sap.com/bp_blv1500/BL_India/index.htm
This is a very good document for guidance.
Regards,
Rajesh Banka -
Regarding rounding off value in pricing procedure
hi fi professionals,
i have an issue regarding pricing procedure, pls help me out, its urgent
i have a condition type, zrou(rounding off value)
the fanda is- when i am creating po- my net value is suppose- 19.90.
so my client requirement is- 0.10
so i have given 0.10, then total value is- 20.00
but this value is not pickin up in migo- accounting document
it is picking 19.90 only.
so what is the configuraion needed in omsy for picking up the total value in accounting doc.
regards,
susantaHi..
You would need to maintain a account key in the pricing procudure which would calculate the balance to make the total a rounded value.
In FI perspective, you need to assign a GL account for that..
Cheers
Raghu -
Difference in rounding off account for period 12-2011
Dear All,
I have done all the month end activities/year end activities for period 12-2011, ie 1KEI, 1KEK, F.05 then done 2KES. But there is a rounding off account in which there is a huge difference. In KE5T, the BAse Ledger shows a balance of '0' and the comparision ledger shows a huge Credit balance. This entire amount is due to some Euro conversions done in period 1 2011.
How can this issue be resolved. What are the steps to be followed? Kindly guide
Thanx
RosalynHi,
But how this is not a finance entry ..... the postings have happened only in Profit centers. When I go to Extras to view the original entry, there is no document existing. Is there some report which can provide this data
Thanx
Rosalyn -
Request for switch off protection in coming new iphone.
Dear apple
Subject- Request for switch off protection in coming new iphone.
I am a very new customer of yours, have bought a iPhone 5s on 25th Dec '13, but unfortunately someone stolen my phone in a MELA in my city. I immediately call my iphone but getting it switch off, as the thief had put the phone in switch off mode. I search it in iCloud with find my iphone apps but getting offline till date. I use pass code & finger print protection that's why probably it can't be use by the thief, but it can be sell as spare parts by opening up its parts . I had do all legal formalities & inform my carrier to lock my sim. Recently I again bought a new iPhone 4s 8GB from amazon.com & using it now.
It is the time to welcoming new iphone probably iphone 6/iphone air in this fall. I have plan to buy it & a apple laptop but first iphone 6 followed by iwatch if you launch & than laptop.
Now coming to the main point why I have written this mail let's explain it - I think you should put a switch off protection in this new device so that someone can't put the phone in switch off mode except the owner, at-least phone can be track till the battery last if someone stollen it. Because I know the problem & pain when someone lose a smart phone with all personal details. So please consider this in your new device as a new feature.
I have given the details of my both phone -
1.iphone 5s Gold
IMEI no
SL no F2******RC6
Parts no MF354HN/A
2. iPhone 4s 8GB black
IMEI no
SL no C8*****ML6
Parts noMF265HN/A
Thanking you
Dr Jyoti Prasad Rajkhowa
Sivsagar
Assam
India
<Edited by Host>This is a user-to-user forum. If you wish to offer Apple feedback, you can do so here: http://www.apple.com/feedback/
As for your suggestion, as much as I can understand what you are requesting, if the device is turned off, it is off. There isn't anything Apple or your carrier can do about that. Having a device that is OFF continue to send a signal suggest all sorts of privacy and battery management issues. -
Condition type: DIFF-Rounding Off
Dear Colleagues,
The condition type DIFF-Rounding off is not woring in sales order.
Config details as follows.
1. OB90->Respective Company Code, Currency & rounding unit of '5' is being set in this transaction.
2. Define condition type DIFF via Transaction V/06. This condition type is maintained as "Group and Item Condition".
3. Included the condition type DIFF in the pricing procedure:setting are as per standard Reqt = 13, Caltype = 16, BasType = 4.
Two issues noticed:
1) In the sales order: DIFF is determined at item level and header level as well but value of DIFF shows "Zero".
2) Crdit memo: DIFF was not determined.
In both the cases Net value + Tax was in decimals, supposed to round off.
Could anyone help what needs to be done or missing data.
What exactly the functionaly of DIFF condittion type... Does it round of Net value + Tax or each condition value .
Thanks & Regards,
Vamsi P.Further, you can refer following SAP notes for your understanding and reference:
- Note 0022963
: Rounding problems in condition basis
- Note 0080183
: Rounding
- Note 0130742
: Roundings in subtotal lines
- Note 0154789
: Roundings in subtotal lines, part 2
- Note 0311135
: Rounding errors of condition value
- Note 0886532
: Pricing: Displaying and rounding numbers
- Note 1481061
: Rounding Customizing in SD
Regards
JP -
Hi,
Anybody help me regarding following issue where to assign rounding off for excise duty (BED,Ecess,HEcess)
Regards,
vivekHi,
In your calculation schema maintain AltCTyp as 17 against these conditions.This will round off to nearest rupee.
Dhruba
Maybe you are looking for
-
TrackPopupMenu causes CNiGraph::TrackZoomRectXY to fail
I've posted this question before, but never received a solution. I've finally narrowed down the problem to one particular function call, CMenu::TrackPopupMenu. My problem is the following: I am working with an MDI application, create a CFormVie
-
Color correction - match two scenes
Hello USING CS4 I posted this question earlier this week but got no response. So I decided to repost with a link to the video. I need to more closely match the colors of the wall in this sample exceprt clip http://www.youtube.com/user/rowbyville?fea
-
I switched from Comcast to Verizon two years ago. Since switching to Verzon, I am continually billed for directory assistance calls that are not being made from this phone. It is normally two or three a month. I must argue every month with custom
-
I had an older version of Firefox on older Mac OS 10.3.9. Tried to update. Crashed the Mac. Lost things saved on my desktop and Firefox that I had benn using for years is gone. Is there an older version I can reinstall?
-
I am trying to create a calendar for my family. Something I saw made me think Firefox has a way to do this and I would like to know how.