Duplicate/ambiguous directory match

I'm using IMS 5.2 Patch 2
One of my email user try to send email to his account using his yahoo email account, but he received bounce back email with the error
[email protected] Mailbox unknown or not accepting mail.
553 5.1.4 duplicate/ambiguous directory match: [email protected]
before last week, he was able to send email to the address....

"duplicate/ambiguous" means that something has changed in the ldap response for that uid. Usually it means that somebody has added the same mail address as "mailAlternateAddress" or such. Check what the ldap response is to the search, and you'll see most likely that the search response includes, "nentries=2" or something like that.
Mail addresses have to be unique. . .

Similar Messages

New iCloud email account not working - duplicate/ambiguous directory match error

I set myself up a new iCloud account this morning once I got iOS 5 loaded on my iPhone 3GS. I was able to create a new @me.com email address, but I think I might have stepped on someone else's existing address as when I send it email, I get a rejection immediately with "duplicate/ambiguous directory entry". iCloud email doesn't work on iCloud.com, and iCloud mail account on the iPhone tells me the user or password is incorrect.
Other than that, iOS 5 is working great so far!

Same symptoms - let's look at the "cause". I was digging in my iPhone settings and although I did everything as prompted in the iCloud setup here is what has actually happened under the hood.
First - What iCloud guided me to do.
•I had a @mac Apple ID I decided to use it for iCloud
•iCloud said I neeeded a new @me address to use mail and iMessaging and asked me to set one up
•I set up a new @me email address
Sencond - The Results
•I can receive email at my new @me address (expected)
•I can login to iCloud online with my old Apple ID (expected)
•I can not send outgoing mail - error on password (unexpected)
Third - Under the Hood (Settings that are a little odd)
On my iPhone, under Settings -> Mail, Contacts, etc -> iCloud -> Account,
At the very bottom under "Advanced" is the email info, now this should be the new active @me address but its NOT! It's my old AppleID with the @mac address - which of course no one can use for "real email" anymore.
iCloud on my phone is attempting to use my @mac address for outgoing messages!!!! ARGH!
WORSE is you can not edit this! You can click and see details, change the "name" but you can not change the address!
I think this might be the issue for all of us on this thread - check it out and see. If so it's something we will def. have to have a fix from apple for. :-( That or perhaps delete your iCloud account, your existing Apple ID and get a new @me Apple ID that will work for email as well. (PITA!) I hope we get a fix from Apple.

Duplicate/ambiguous addresses in iMS 6.3

I've just migrated from iMS 5.2 to iMS 6.3-1.04. Our old iMS used dirsync, so direct comparisons are difficult, but when email addresses which used to be considered unique are used in the new system, I'm getting the "duplicate/ambiguous" error.
Here's the sample LDAP from one of the affected users, who married, and carried two LDAP entries (serial numbers filed off):
dn: uid=abcde, ou=nsPeople, o=company.com, c=US
mailalternateaddress: [email protected]
mail: [email protected]
maildeliveryoption: forward
mailforwardingaddress: [email protected]
objectclass: mailrecipient
mailhost: mailhub.company.com
inetmail: yes
dn: uid=12345,ou=nsPeople,o=company.com,c=US
mailalternateaddress: [email protected]
mail: [email protected]
mailforwardingaddress: [email protected]
objectclass: mailrecipient
Our old iMS 5.2 system keyed only on "objectclass: mailrecipient" for valid entries, but when you send to "[email protected]" it had no problem forwarding to the Exchange address.
The new iMS 6.3 system views both as valid. Is there some way to set an LDAP filter on an attribute which will let iMS 6.3 pick out valid email? iMS 5.2 had the "local.imta.ugfilter", but iMS 6.3 has nothing like that I can find.
Any help is appreciated!
Chris

Hi,
dn: uid=abcde, ou=nsPeople, o=company.com, c=US
mailalternateaddress: [email protected]
mail: [email protected]
maildeliveryoption: forward
mailforwardingaddress:
[email protected]
objectclass: mailrecipient
mailhost: mailhub.company.com
inetmail: yes
dn: uid=12345,ou=nsPeople,o=company.com,c=US
mailalternateaddress: [email protected]
mail: [email protected]
mailforwardingaddress: [email protected]
objectclass: mailrecipient
Our old iMS 5.2 system keyed only on "objectclass:
mailrecipient" for valid entries, but when you send
to "[email protected]" it had no problem
forwarding to the Exchange address.Do you mean "objectclass: mailrecipient" or "inetmail: yes"? Both accounts have the former so wouldn't this have caused confusion with dirsync?
The new iMS 6.3 system views both as valid. Is there
some way to set an LDAP filter on an attribute which
will let iMS 6.3 pick out valid email? iMS 5.2 had
the "local.imta.ugfilter", but iMS 6.3 has nothing
like that I can find.Ideally you should be looking at cleaning up the duplicate addresses -- so having a one-to-one model (one email address per account). Anything else is bound to lead to problems in the future.
One thing you may want to try is to add the following to the inactive account:
"mailuserstatus: deleted"
From the Messaging Server Admin Guide:
"Sanity Checks on the LDAP Result: After the LDAP search has returned a result, it is checked to verify that there is only one entry in it. If there are more than one, each entry is checked to see if it has the right object class for a user or a group, a non-deleted status, and for users, a UID. Entries that do not pass this check are ignored. If the list of multiple entries is reduced to one by this check, processing proceeds. If not, a duplicate or ambiguous directory error is returned."
The one downside I can see with this is that if you run a commadmin purge or similar it could remove the entry (since its marked deleted) - this is something you would need to test.
Regards,
Shane.

How to delete duplicate entries in match code

I want to delete duplicate entries in match code.

If you go down the search exit route, using function module F4_IF_SHLP_EXAMPLE or function module F4_IF_SHLP_EXIT as a template you want it where callcontrol-step = 'DISP'. You would sort the table: SORT RECORD_TAB BY STRING and then delete adjacent duplicates. If this does not wok because of the fields you have in your search help, you will need to select the data into another internal table and match the relevant entries from your internal table with the relevant position in field STRING of RECORD_TAB. The positions in STRING will be as per the order of the parameters you have defined in the search help.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Larissa

Update caused duplicates in iTunes Match ?

Since downloading the new iTunes I have hundreds of duplicates of my songs appear when using iTunes Match, if I switch iTunes Match of they disappear. I have well over 100 GB of music is there an easy way to get rid of the duplicates in iTunes Match as it will take me a very long time to delete them individually I had no problem before the update.

Funny, that you bring this up, I actually called about this yesterday, and looked up the article myself. Once you sign up for itunes Match Genuious becoumes disabled!!!!! The bad thing is, you have to dig pretty deep to find that out!!!!!! Sorry mate it's an Apple thing.

Saxon: recovery policy via Java API? (avoid "Ambiguous rule match" error)

When I switch the XMLTransformer from the Java built in Xalan to Saxon (9), I get many
Ambiguous rule match for /
Matches both "document-node()" on line 22 of file:/D:/Tmp/test/layouts/lay_Client_T_SM_Notes_2C.xsl
and "document-node()" on line 6 of file:/D:/Tmp/test/subReports/S_RiskValues_S.xslerrors. I read that you can "relax" these checks with the TransformerFactory attributes
//http://www.saxonica.com/documentation/using-xsl/embedding/jaxp-transformation.html
tf.setAttribute("http://saxon.sf.net/feature/recoveryPolicy", 1); //dynamic XSLT errors => warning
tf.setAttribute("http://saxon.sf.net/feature/recoveryPolicyName", "recoverWithWarnings");but this doesn't work. (I check to have the saxon parse via tf.getClass().getName())

If anyone is interested I have now found a resolution for issue.
The client certificate authentication needed to be at transport level and not message level.
Following discussions with Oracle, my understanding is that OWSM manager can be used to only apply policy data at message level.
Using OWSM was not the method to fulfil this sort of requirement. Instead I needed to configure a 2 way SSL handshake.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E13159_01/osb/docs10gr3/security/transport_level.html
Re: How to call https service from OSB
Edited by: 920251 on 12-Apr-2012 05:14
Edited by: 920251 on 12-Apr-2012 05:15

How to duplicate an iTunes Match Library File

I had a 2007 iMac and used an external hard drive to store all my music, as I have over 9000 songs and I use AIFF and/or Lossless compression for audio purpuses. All my playlists, etc, were set up exactly the way I wanted them. I also subscribed to iTunesMatch, which backed up all my files and playlists exactly the way they were on the computer, but at 256kbps vs lossess. Last month, my iMac finally died and now I'm using my MacBook Air. All the songs and playlists show up when running iTunesMatch, but all those songs are held "in the cloud" and at 256kbps vs AIFF. I tried the "Depress and hold the option keyu and launch iTunes" option to choose my iTunes Library, and found my externally stored hard drive music files. However, when I select that folder, it states "An iTunes library file could not be found in the folder "Music". Please choose a different folder".
How can I recreate my iTunes playlist so that the MacBook Air is reading from the harddrive, but playing the playlists as organized by iTunesMatch?

You're need to contact iTunes Store support directly to request a refund.

Firefox with Profile-sync-daemon creates duplicate cache directory

I've set up the Profile-sync-daemon https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pr … ync-daemon (mainly to ease on my old SSD) and it works fine but Firefox keeps creating entries in
/home/<username>/.cache/mozilla/firefox/<myprofilename>
It contains 3 directories
/safebrowsing
/startupCache
/thumbnails
Since I set up psd I've been using
browser.cache.disk.parent_directory : /home/<myusername>/.mozilla/firefox/<myprofilename>
What can I do to address this issue? What I tried:
1. browser.cache.use_new_backend 0 (restore to default)
Last edited by bbarcher (2014-04-05 18:51:05)

gedgon wrote:
1. use your user account
2.
$mkdir ~/.mozilla/firefox/<profilename>/0CachesSymlinked
Same result as in post #7.
Apparently I suck at symlinking. I wouldn't want to waste anybody's time. I'll revisit the topic once I learn the basics of symlinking. I'll use ASD in the meantime.
EDIT:
OK, I got it now. The problem was that at the time I issued
ln -s /home/<username>/.mozilla/firefox/<profilename>/0CachesSymlinked /home/<username>/.cache/mozilla/firefox/<profilename>
the
/home/<username>/.cache/mozilla/firefox/<profilename>
already existed (I left it out, don't ask)
Since I'm a symlinking savvy I'm going to symlink my ~/Downloads to my external drive
graysky wrote:@OP - Yes, since v21 of firefox, it uses ~/.cache for the caching just like chromium. The simple solution is to mount ~/.cache as tmpfs in your fstab. I documented this is psd's man page. Here is a link describing how to do it.
I'd rather preserve contents of ~/.cache between reboots. Especially because it holds nautilus thumbnails. I'd rather keep my Firefox cache as well.
Last edited by bbarcher (2014-04-06 18:09:52)

How to solve conflict mail address when using aliased domain?

Currently I am using domain1.com on messaging server.
For some reason I have to merge users from domain2.com to the same messaging server.
How can I solve the email address conflict problem if two users have the same username on domain1 and domain2?
For example,
User1: [email protected]
User2: [email protected]
After adding associateddomain domain2.com to messaging server, it seems user1 will own [email protected] automatically.
(The fact is: messaging server will do search on LDAP below:)
13:58:59.02: URL determined to be: ldap:///o%3Ddomain1.com%2Cdc%3Ddomain1%2Cdc%3Dcom?*?sub?(|([email protected])([email protected])([email protected])([email protected])([email protected])([email protected]))
How can user1 still own [email protected] and user2 keep using his [email protected]?
Here is the test result, after adding associated domain (domain2.com), user1 will own [email protected]
//@msg# imsimta version
Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)
libimta.so 6.2-3.04 (built 01:32:55, Jul 15 2005)
SunOS msg 5.10 Generic_118855-19 i86pc i386 i86pc
//@msg# imsimta test -rewrite
Address: [email protected]
forward channel = l
channel description =
channel user filter =
dest channel filter =
source channel filter =
channel flags #0 = BIDIRECTIONAL MULTIPLE IMMNONURGENT NOSERVICEALL
channel flags #1 = NOSMTP DEFAULT
channel flags #2 = COPYSENDPOST COPYWARNPOST POSTHEADONLY HEADERINC NOEXPROUTE
channel flags #3 = LOGGING NOGREY NORESTRICTED RETAINSECURITYMULTIPARTS
channel flags #4 = EIGHTBIT NOHEADERTRIM NOHEADERREAD RULES
channel flags #5 =
channel flags #6 = LOCALUSER REPORTNOTARY
channel flags #7 = NOSWITCHCHANNEL NOREMOTEHOST DATEFOUR DAYOFWEEK
channel flags #8 = NODEFRAGMENT EXQUOTA REVERSE NOCONVERT_OCTET_STREAM
channel flags #9 = NOTHURMAN INTERPRETENCODING USEINTERMEDIATE RECEIVEDFROM VALIDATELOCALSYSTEM NOTURN
defaulthost = domain1.com domain1.com
linelength = 1023
channel env addr type = SOURCEROUTE
channel hdr addr type = SOURCEROUTE
channel official host = msg.domain1.com
channel queue 0 name = LOCAL_POOL
channel queue 1 name = LOCAL_POOL
channel queue 2 name = LOCAL_POOL
channel queue 3 name = LOCAL_POOL
channel after params =
channel user name =
urgentnotices = 2 4 24
normalnotices = 2 4 24
nonurgentnotices = 2 4 24
channel rightslist ids =
nonurgentbackoff = PT10M PT30M PT1H PT2H
normalbackoff = PT10M PT30M PT1H PT2H
urgentbackoff = PT10M PT30M PT1H PT2H
local behavior flags = %x7
expandchannel =
notificationchannel =
dispositionchannel =
saslswitchchannel =
tlsswitchchannel =
backward channel = tcp_local
header To: address = [email protected]
header From: address = [email protected]
envelope To: address = [email protected] (route (msg.domain1.com,msg.domain1.com)) (host domain2.com)
envelope From: address = [email protected]
name =
mbox = ab
Extracted address action list:
[email protected]
Extracted 733 address action list:
[email protected]
Address list expansion:
23770@ims-ms-daemon
1 expansion total.
Expanded address:
[email protected]
Submitted address list:
ims-ms
23770@ims-ms-daemon (orig [email protected], inter [email protected], host ims-ms-daemon) NOTIFY-FAILURES NOTIFY-DELAYS
Submitted notifications list:
Address:
23370 is the uid for user1 on domain1.com
I have also tried to assign mailEquivalentAddress (or mailAlternateAddress) for user1 and user2, but it seems user1 will still occupy [email protected]
user1:
mail: [email protected]
mailEquivalentAddress: [email protected]
user2:
mail: [email protected]
mailEquivalentAddress: [email protected]
Address: [email protected]
forward channel = l
channel description =
channel user filter =
dest channel filter =
source channel filter =
channel flags #0 = BIDIRECTIONAL MULTIPLE IMMNONURGENT NOSERVICEALL
channel flags #1 = NOSMTP DEFAULT
channel flags #2 = COPYSENDPOST COPYWARNPOST POSTHEADONLY HEADERINC NOEXPROUTE
channel flags #3 = LOGGING NOGREY NORESTRICTED RETAINSECURITYMULTIPARTS
channel flags #4 = EIGHTBIT NOHEADERTRIM NOHEADERREAD RULES
channel flags #5 =
channel flags #6 = LOCALUSER REPORTNOTARY
channel flags #7 = NOSWITCHCHANNEL NOREMOTEHOST DATEFOUR DAYOFWEEK
channel flags #8 = NODEFRAGMENT EXQUOTA REVERSE NOCONVERT_OCTET_STREAM
channel flags #9 = NOTHURMAN INTERPRETENCODING USEINTERMEDIATE RECEIVEDFROM VALIDATELOCALSYSTEM NOTURN
defaulthost = domain1.com domain1.com
linelength = 1023
channel env addr type = SOURCEROUTE
channel hdr addr type = SOURCEROUTE
channel official host = msg.domain1.com
channel queue 0 name = LOCAL_POOL
channel queue 1 name = LOCAL_POOL
channel queue 2 name = LOCAL_POOL
channel queue 3 name = LOCAL_POOL
channel after params =
channel user name =
urgentnotices = 2 4 24
normalnotices = 2 4 24
nonurgentnotices = 2 4 24
channel rightslist ids =
nonurgentbackoff = PT10M PT30M PT1H PT2H
normalbackoff = PT10M PT30M PT1H PT2H
urgentbackoff = PT10M PT30M PT1H PT2H
local behavior flags = %x7
expandchannel =
notificationchannel =
dispositionchannel =
saslswitchchannel =
tlsswitchchannel =
backward channel = tcp_local
header To: address = [email protected]
header From: address = [email protected]
envelope To: address = [email protected] (route (msg.domain1.com,msg.domain1.com)) (host domain2.com)
envelope From: address = [email protected]
name =
mbox = ab
Extracted address action list:
[email protected]
Extracted 733 address action list:
[email protected]
Address list expansion:
-17 expansion total.
Submitted address list:
Address list error -- 5.1.4 duplicate/ambiguous directory match: [email protected]
Submitted notifications list:
Address:
Any sugestion for this issue? I appreicate for your reply.

As long as the users are in different domains, they do not have the "same" mail address, and there is no conflict.
However, if you "alias" one domain to the other, then you will have a conflict, and will need to change one of the mail addresses.
You do not have to "associate" or alias the new domain. Messaging Server can support a large number of separate domains, without such things.

Can you use iTunes match and not get duplicates if you maintain mp3s and aiffs files of the same song in either the same or separate libraries?

I maintain a collection of aiff files and mp3 files of the same music.
Aiff for home listening and Mp3 for my devices.
I can arrange these in the same or seperate libraires.
Will "itunes match" duplicate the songs in the cloud if they in the same or seperate libraies on the same mac?
If not, is anyone aware of how to manage seperate Mp3 and Aiff libraries so as not to get duplicates in itune match?
All assistance is appreciated.
Thanks!

Hello mracole,
I checked my "purchases" and the 7/19/13 purchases don't show up. However, the earlier versions from usually several years back...the ones that are Matched...often do show up in my Purchases. I suspect that somehow those REALLY purchased several year old versions were deleted and redownloaded by me so I could change them to the 256 kbps versions under iTunes Match. They were probably 128 kbps versions originally when purchased.
Why the earlier versions that were really purchased are now identified as Matched is puzzling.
Why I now have Purchased versions from 7/19/13 is puzzling too...especially since these versions do NOT show up in my purchases.
Calling Apple Support if a good idea unless someone can explain this mystery. I might even take one of my laptops to the Apple store and show a Genius.
Thank you very much for taking the time to respond, Mr. Luigi

Compare two columns and match ALL recurring values, not just the first instance

Hi everybody...
I was looking for a way to compare values in two columns, identifying every duplicate value instance on a third column.
Searching around the forums, I found a solution, albeit a partial one; I am using this formula: =IFERROR("Duplicate in row "&MATCH($A,$B,0),"") along column C, to compare values between columns A and B. When applied, the formula will render the first instance where there is a duplicate; unfortunately MATCH will only register the first instance of the duplicated values.
For example:
The first value on column A is 'Apple'. On column B there are three instances for the value 'Apple', the formula identifies the first of these values, but not the remaining two.
I am not an advanced Numbers or Excel user, and the answer to this problem eludes me. I am attempting to compare columns that have no less than 1000 rows each, so you can imagine how, finding a solution to my problem would be really great.
Thanks in advance,
Pablo

Unfortunately I can't see your screenshot, but supposing you have a table like this:
Col1
Col2
1
3
Dupe
2
4
Dupe
3
5
Dupe
4
6
5
7
Then here is one way to flag the duplicates.
The formula in C2, copied down, is:
=IF(COUNTIF($A,$B2)≥1,"Dupe","")
Then filter on column C for 'Dupe', and copy the values in column B to wherever you need them.
SG

Issue in getting score while executing the matching strategy

Hi,
On executing the matching strategy, even if there is a duplicate count of zero in the record pane, some score is calculated. I want to know how does the system get that score even if there is no potential duplicate in the matches pane.
Also we are facing an issue - whenever the matching strategy is executed, some score is calculated which does not match with any one of the individual score in the match pane.
Can anyone guide me what might be the reason?
Regards,
Indraveer

Hi Indraveer,
On executing the matching strategy, even if there is a duplicate count of zero in the record pane,
some score is calculated. I want to know how does the system get that score even if there is no
potential duplicate in the matches pane.
First i want to clarify how this score getting calculated.
In the record pane the three extra coloumn tell about the result about matching strategy
Count : this represent the no of record matches with the selected record based on the matching strategy executed
Class : This defines
Score : this contains the sum of score of all rules that contain in strategy i.e. You know in rules tab we define the value for
SUCCESS
FALIURE
UNDEFINED
So in the score section it calcilates the score of each rules that you included in executed strategy.
For Example
Your 1st rules contain values like
SUCCESS :2
FALIURE :1
UNDEFINED:0
Your 2nd rules contain values like
SUCCESS :3
FALIURE :1
UNDEFINED:0 (this score if contain NULL values and data manger unable to execute the matching)
Now ypu included these two rules in strategy and define
High threshhold : 5
Low threshhold :4
Now you execute the strategy
I will consider yr case that no one record matches .In this case score section will contain value 2 because it fails in matching
any rules so it get 1 for rule1 and 1 from Rule2.
Hope it clarifies yr doubt.
Also we are facing an issue - whenever the matching strategy is executed, some score is calculated which does not match with any one of the individual score in the match pane.
After Whatever i understand from yr statement,this will be the case when you have multiple rules ans some record succeed in all rules while some are succeed in one and fail in second rule.
For example :
we have 3 record in table in which first one matches with both record for all rules where as second record matches with some record for first rule and some for second rule so their total score calaculate accordingly
and third record matches with some reord for second rule and some record with first rule so their score will calculate automatical;ly.
so in this case when u select first record in record pane and open match pane you will see other two record with different score as this score shows there personal score after executing matching strategies.
Hope this will help you to clarify yr doubt .
For further reading please check the data manager reference guide on page 500.
Thanks,
Sudhanshu

Will playlists be duplicated when two libraries are merged by iTunes Match?

Hi All!
I am preparing to start up iTunes Match, and will be attempting to merge two libraries, one from my wife's machine and one from my own. Most of the contents of these libraies is, in fact, duplicative, but there are likely several hundreds tracks unique to each.
They also have duplicative playlists. Most of our playlists are not "mix tapes," but simply a particular CD by a particular artist, e.g., Back on Top by Van Morrison.
I've read many posts in this forum already, and plan to create a brand new Apple ID that we can both use for iTunes purchases. (We each have our own iCloud IDs. This seems like a reasonable way to go. I will be "matching" he library first and, then, once that is finished, adding my own.
Here's the question: Will that result in having two copies of all those duplicative playlists? It would be truly annoying to have to delete every other playlist, though I will man up to the task if that is what is required.
I would like to know, however, if that's what I am likely in for.
Any advice on that score (or on my other plans as stated above) would be most welcome.
Thanks,
Greg

Greg, I don't have any experience with multiple IDs and computers. However the "problems" I can see cropping up are:
1. The playlists in different iTunes libraries will be uploaded. If there are the same playlists in each library then there will be duplicates in iTunes Match. You'll probably want to weed out some of the duplicates.
2. You're probably going to get duplicate songs as well. At this time the only way to not get those dups from different iTunes libraries will be to actually remove them from one library.
3. As to the Apps, you won't lose access to any Apps, and you should be able to update them as long as you authorize each library for the original iTunes Store account ID. This can be done by pulling down Store > Authorize this Computer.
As long as you proceed slowly, and have backups of everything (just in case) I see no reason why your plan won't work. Just don't rush it. Let one library match before doing the other, and do both iTunes libraries before enabling iTM on any of your other iDevices.

Matching Filter within Integration Profile

I am trying to modify my 'Connected Directory Matching Filter' so that only users are pulled, and all groups (except for a few) are ignored. I am pulling from Active Directory into OID.
This is the string I tried for ignoring computers and groups, but groups still pass thru (not sure about computers)
"searchfilter=(|((objectclass=user)(!(objectclass=computer)(objectclass=group))))"
Can anyone help with this? Or point me to a reference/examples for RFC-1558 that work within the Matching Filter. I assume its using the LDAP search filter syntax.
Version of OID : 10.1.2.0.0 on RH 3
Windows 2003 Server AD
Thanks,
Chris

use searchfilter=(objectclass=user) if you only want users coming from AD to OID.
use searchfilter=(objectclass=group) if you only want groups coming from AD to OID.
If you want to put users in Users contaier and Groups on Groups containr you´ll have to create 2 Import Profiles.
Hope this can help you!

Java.lang.Exception: Multiple Matches Found

Hi,
I have written scheduler task to connect people soft DataBase get the users list and disable user accounts in IDM . Below is the peace of code.
=============================
ResultSet results = stmt.executeQuery(selectQuery);
tcReconciliationOperationsIntf reconUtil = (tcReconciliationOperationsIntf)getUtility("Thor.API.Operations.tcReconciliationOperationsIntf");
HashMap[] userValues = null;
userValues = createDeleteHashMap(results);
if (userValues.length < 1)
return;
Set deletedAcc = reconUtil.provideDeletionDetectionData(this.resourceObject, userValues);
============================================================
In the Set deletedAcc = reconUtil.provideDeletionDetectionData(this.resourceObject, userValues); i am getting the following exception . please help me
Regarding this.
[XELLERATE.APIS],Class/Method: tcReconciliationOperationsBean/provideDeletionDetectionData encounter some problems: Multiple Matches Found
java.lang.Exception: Multiple Matches Found
Edited by: user11084273 on Sep 26, 2012 12:36 AM

I believe this API expects only to match no more than one user on each of the criteria set in the paoAccountDataList (userValues) in your case, i.e. each entry in the map must give a unique identifier of one resource. This map is not a map of attributes of one account, which together identify one resource, as any one ambiguous value in the map will give this error. It appears at least one entry in you userValues map is ambiguous and matches multiple resources. I guess this all depends on what your initial select query was.

Duplicate/ambiguous directory match

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for