Dynamic (ephemeral) Port Allocation Global or per-IP?

Due to an unfortunate application design, I am encountering an issue where I am exhausting ephemeral ports, even after increasing the range. We have noticed the ephemeral port range seems to be allocated globally, regardless of sourceIP.
This post http://charlesgate86.wordpress.com/2011/09/23/cas-connection-scalibility-between-exchange-2007-2010/ seems to indicate that support was added in Windows
Server 2008 for per-IP source port selection. However, it also indicates that applications must be modifiied to leverage such support, but alas does not give any details on the modifications required.
The relevant section:
Where we see a scale limitation is between CAS and mailbox. Prior to Windows Server 2008, each outbound connection would
only use a single source port regardless of the destination IP or whether the source port was available for use; in other words, once the source port was used, it could not be used for any other outbound connection on the server. Thus we were limited
to the maximum number of TCP/IP connections, which for Exchange Server 2007 is 60,000 (MaxUserPort TCP setting).
We addressed this in Windows Server 2008 by allowing the source port to be used once on a per IP address basis. So now as long as we have additional IP addresses on CAS,
we can scale 60,000 outbound connections per source IP address. However, the corresponding
applications had to take advantage of this new feature. In the case of Outlook Anywhere, the RPC Proxy service on Windows Server 2008 was updated to do so. DSProxy, on the other hand, was not – so the mailbox
server is limited to 60,000 outbound connections to global catalog servers."
Where can I find information on the application changes required to take advantage of per-IP source port selection?
Thank you

Hi,
Due to this issue is more related to coding, to get better help, please post your question on the MSDN forum.
Here is the address,
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home
Best Regards.
Steven Lee
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

BizTalk Server 2013 and deployment MSI with dynamic send ports

Hello community, wonder if any help out there for this odd problem.
Deployment of application msi fails into BizTalk 2013 prod environment, fails when deploying the project dll that contains all the orchestrations,
and reports a failure to apply early bindings. The only early bindings in this project are dynamic send ports. I cannot recreate the problem in in my QAS environment where deployments of the same msi works fine.
I can build an msi without any bindings at all except for the dynamically created ones, and this also display the same behaviour on import.
I have test deployed a 2nd unrelated app that also uses dynamic send ports, and this displays the problem.
Adding the assembly directly to BizTalk console displays the same behaviour.
Deployment of msi apps without dynamic send ports are ok.
The dynamic ports use a pipeline including a custom pipeline component which I can confirm is available in the correct directory
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft BizTalk Server 2013\Pipeline Components
No specific further detail is available in the error except.
Import Wizard[09/05/2014 08:20:47]: Error in Importing Application
Import Wizard[09/05/2014 08:20:47]: Change requests failed for some resources.
BizTalkAssemblyResourceManager failed to complete end type change request.
Unable to deploy early bindings.
Failed to update binding information.
Error in the application.
Other information that may be relevant:
The main difference between QAS and PROD is that PROD is a two node cluster. Import behaviour is the same if attempted on either node. Assemblies are installed in both nodes currently.
The dynamic ports are set on handlers that are non-clustered hosts (all are for adapter type SMTP).
I have ensured that all the adapter handlers are identically setup in both environments.
The project files were migrated to BizTalk 2013 from BizTalk 2010, imported and then converted using VS 2012.
The msi has installed the assemblies as per usual and they do exist in the .net 4 gac
There is a reference to a shared resource in a different application, this application is installed and imported ok.
I’m a bit stuck at what to try now, I have option where I could recreate the dynamic ports from scratch in the orchestrations and redeploy to dev in the hope it’s something that VS2012 didn’t handle too gracefully
when converting the project. I could move the functionality into a helper class and forget about using dynamic sends, rather not go down that route. I'm still suspecting this is small difference in setup
of the group between QAS and PROD but I can't see anything jumping out.
Any comments are most welcome.

The dynamic ports use a pipeline including a custom pipeline component which I can confirm is available in the correct directory
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft BizTalk Server 2013\Pipeline Components
I’m a bit stuck at what to try now, I have option where I could recreate the dynamic ports from scratch in the orchestrations and redeploy to dev in the hope it’s something
that VS2012 didn’t handle too gracefully when converting the project.
Two things.
1. That's what I would do first, recreate (really just change and reset the properties) the Orchestration Ports in Visual Studio.
2. Probably not related but, Custom Pipeline Components should not be placed in the Pipeline Components folder. All Custom Pipeline Components should be in the GAC only. The Pipeline Components folder
is a compatibility vestige from BizTalk Server 2004.

Configuring Ephemeral Ports in a Zone

Hey,
I'm attempting to configure the ephemeral ports in a zone, and having the following problem:
bash-2.05b# ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_smallest_anon_port 32778
operation failed: Not owner
If anyone is able to help, I'd appreciate it....

You will likely need to configure this from the global zone, or give the zone exclusive access to the network device if possible.
The local zone doesn't own the device, and therefore cannot make the change.

RVS4000 PASV/Ephemeral Ports

If I have the IP ACL firewall enabled in my RVS4000 I have trouble connecting to specific websites and also connecting to Apple's update servers. The problem appears to be that the firewall is blocking incoming data to the ephemeral ports even when they are allowed in the firewall rules. I've also tried port forwarding rules but the only thing that resolves the problem is to disable the firewall entirely, which is not the desired resolution. The firmware version is 2.0.27. Any ideas on how to resolve this problem?

The order of the ACL may have everything to do with your issue but may not be a bug in the software. You will not be able to create a rule for your Ephemeral ports as they are used dynamically. The rule to allow Ephemeral ports would basically be "Firewall off". If possible post your ACL (protecting your real IPs) as the problem may be there. Need to take a good look at your "Deny" rules to make sure you are not denying more than you intended. Also note that destination port never changes but source will. In other words if you are trying to access a website from your computer, the destination will always be port 80. But the source port will be an Ephemeral port as you noted. The range can be typically anywhere between 1025 - 65535. Depending on the OS, the range can vary a bit, which is why it would not be possible to effectively create a rule using those ports.
Your rules should look something like this:
allow destination port <80>
allow destination port <5900>
allow destination port <53>
deny
The above example will lock down your network to only the services you specified and everything else will be denied. Note that this denies YOUR hosts from accessing services, this will not prevent an OUTSIDE host accessing a mail server INSIDE your network; for example. That rule would be created as a port forward rule and you should never try to duplicate port forward rules with firewall rules. The RVS4000 does not like that.
Hope that helps

Dynamically assign a send pipeline to a dynamic send port in orchestration

Hi
I have an orchestration that is using a dynamic send port. I need to somehow assign the send pipeline to the dynamic send port programmatically.
for example, I will have a decide shape in the orchestration. Based on the condition in the decide shape I need to assign the corresponding send pipeline for that condition. let's say in Branch A, I want to select xml assembler , in Branch B I will want
to select a flat file assembler...
how can this be achieved. I have seen some links recommending using the ESB tool kit, but I do not want to go down that route.
any help is appreciated
Regards, Mazin - MCTS BizTalk Server 2006

Ashwin
Thanks again for your reply.
If I do it using role links I will loose the flexibility I have "having a dynamic file name" lots of our partners would like to receive their files with specific file naming convention based on the content of the file.
If I use a decide shape / another dynamic send port, this means that everytime I have a new custom pipeline I would need to modify the orchestration and add another decide branch with another dynamic send port.
both of the above suggestions will break the flexibility of the solution since we now can configure new partners in seconds in the configuration database without the need to modify the orchestration or add any new send ports
Regards, Mazin - MCTS BizTalk Server 2006
So in your requirement, the “dynamic” nature you want from send port are
following:
To set the send file names dynamically depends on the message received.
To send the message to different send locations depending on the message received. You want to retrieve this destination URL location from database.
And send ports may have different pipeline component like flat-file and XML ones.
As I have commented in my earlier reply, Role-Link could fit your bill perfectly and this can be achieved by using following:
1) Receive a message into an Orchestration.
2) In Orchestration set the file name dynamically based on the received file and following code shall help you to set the name of the file to dynamic.
msgToBeSend(FILE.ReceivedFileName)="YourDynamicFileNameUWantToAssign";
Use the above while constructing the outgoing message.
3) Create a “Provider” Role-Link with send port type following the wizard.
4) In Orchestration’s expression shape may be before sending the message out,
performs the party resolution using a code similar to the following:
YourRoleLinkName(Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.DestinationParty) = new Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.Party(msgToBeSend.YourDistingushedPropertyToIdentifyParty, "OrganizationName");
5) In the above sample code “YourDistingushedPropertyToIdentifyParty” refer for the code which could identify the partyname where the send port is configured.
6) Create Parties representing different type of message to be send like flat-file or XML messages.
7) Create a static send port and populate the outbound URL dynamically by using a custom pipeline component. In the custom pipeline component URL can be dynamically bound by calling the database as per your reqirement i.e based on the received message by
accessing its content in custom pipeline access the database, find the destination URL and assign the “OutboundTransportLocation” context property of the outbound message something like this
msgToBeSend.Context.Promote("OutboundTransportLocation", "http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003/system-properties", YourOutboundURLFromDatabase);
Refer this article on this topic:
http://www.codit.eu/blog/2013/03/06/adding-dynamic-behavior-to-static-send-ports-a-caveat/
8) In the Parties you have created assign the send ports.
9) GoTo your “Role-Links” folder within the deployed BizTalk application and enlist the parties.
These steps enable you to achieve the dynamic requirement you want to implement with the mentioned Role-Link.
Regards,
M.R.Ashwin Prabhu
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Dynamic Send Port : The FILE send adapter cannot open file C:\Temp for writing. Details: Access is denied.

Hi All,
We have requirement of using ESB toolkit and transforming incoming xml file to edi format. So, we are using ItinerarySelectReceiveXML pipeline for receiving the input from the input location and "EDISend" pipeline for transforming it into EDI and
send it to destination.
Now, the receive pipeline is picking up the file, but it is not processed and sent to destination.
And, we are getting an Access Denied error from Dynamic send port.
Error Description :
The FILE send adapter cannot open file C:\Users\Public\Temp for writing.
Details: Access is denied.
Any Immediate solutions/suggestions are appreciated...Thanks.
Anand

The difference between dynamic and static port would be send handler. For dynamic port, default send handler will be used and for static port the one configured on the port will be used, could you validate this configuration.
Also sometimes, administrative privileges are not "real" administrative privileges and company admins will have limited permissions on C Drive folders. Try writing to some other folder to isolate the issue.
Regards, Ajeet Kumar MCTS Biztalk Server

INST-08010: Error in validating the port range for auto port allocation

Hello guys, I am using the installer to install OBIEE 11.1.7.0 on my machine. When I get to step 6, I receive the error messages below:
INST-08010: Error in validating the port range for auto port allocation. At least 2 ports should be free within the range 7000-7500 for the Adminserver and Adminserver SSL.
Ensure that a minimum of 2 ports are free within the range 7000-7500 for auto port allocation to work correctly for the Adminserver and Adminserver SSL.
INST-08010: Error in validating the port range for auto port allocation. At least 3 ports should be free within the range 9500-9699 for the Weblogic Components for BI (WLS Managed Server, Managed Server SSL and NodeManager).
Ensure that a minimum of 3 ports are free within the range 9500-9699 for auto port allocation to work correctly for the Weblogic Components for BI (WLS Managed Server, Managed Server SSL and NodeManager).
INST-08012: Error in validating the port range for auto port allocation. At least 3 consecutive ports should be free within the range 9500-9699 for the OPMN, in addition to 3 free ports required for Weblogic Components for BI (WLS Managed Server, Managed Server SSL and NodeManager).
Ensure that a minimum of 3 consecutive ports are free within the range 9500-9699 for auto port allocation to work correctly for the OPMN, in addition to 3 free ports required for Weblogic Components for BI (WLS Managed Server, Managed Server SSL and NodeManager).
My Operating System below:
Linux Red Hat 5.9 X86 64bit
My uname -a are below:
Linux redhat59 2.6.18-348.el5 #1 SMP Wed Nov 28 21:22:00 EST 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
My /etc/hosts file are below:
# Do not remove the following line, or various programs
# that require network functionality will fail.
127.0.0.1   localhost.localdomain localhost
10.10.80.19 redhat59
My /etc/sysconfig/network are below:
NETWORKING=yes
NETWORKING_IPV6=no
HOSTNAME=redhat59
GATEWAY=10.174.27.228
My /etc/sysconfig/iptables are below:
# Generated by iptables-save v1.3.5 on Tue Dec 3 17:01:17 2013
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [425:33860]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [307:40164]
COMMIT
# Completed on Tue Dec 3 17:01:17 2013
My ifconfig are below:
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:55:9B:C9
          inet addr:10.174.27.233 Bcast:10.174.27.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
          RX packets:200216 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:95849 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:110668992 (105.5 MiB) TX bytes:209784134 (200.0 MiB)
lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
          inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
          RX packets:109200 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:109200 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:257845896 (245.9 MiB) TX bytes:257845896 (245.9 MiB)
my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 are below:
# Virtio Network Device
DEVICE=eth0
BOOTPROTO=static
BROADCAST=10.174.27.255
HWADDR=52:54:00:55:9B:C9
IPADDR=10.174.27.233
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=10.174.27.0
ONBOOT=yes
Have any suggestion please?
Many Thanks
D

In setDomainEnv.sh set debugFlag=false or you can just remove it.
NodeManager is a charm after that. it can take any number of ports.
Cheers !!

[ERROR]:INST-08010: Error in validating the port range for auto port allocation

I am installing OBIEE 11.1.1.7.0 on a linux x86 version. I get the below error when running the installer: [VALIDATION] [ERROR]:INST-08010: Error in validating the port range for auto port allocation. At least 2 ports should be free within the range 7000-7500 for the Adminserver and Adminserver SSL. [VALIDATION] [SUGGESTION]:Ensure that a minimum of 2 ports are free within the range 7000-7500 for auto port allocation to work correctly for the Adminserver and Adminserver SSL. [VALIDATION] [ERROR]:INST-08010: Error in validating the port range for auto port allocation. At least 3 ports should be free within the range 9500-9699 for the Weblogic Components for BI (WLS Managed Server, Managed Server SSL and NodeManager). [VALIDATION] [SUGGESTION]:Ensure that a minimum of 3 ports are free within the range 9500-9699 for auto port allocation to work correctly for the Weblogic Components for BI (WLS Managed Server, Managed Server SSL and NodeManager). [VALIDATION] [ERROR]:INST-08012: Error in validating the port range for auto port allocation. At least 3 consecutive ports should be free within the range 9500-9699 for the OPMN, in addition to 3 free ports required for Weblogic Components for BI (WLS Managed Server, Managed Server SSL and NodeManager). [VALIDATION] [SUGGESTION]:Ensure that a minimum of 3 consecutive ports are free within the range 9500-9699 for auto port allocation to work correctly for the OPMN, in addition to 3 free ports required for Weblogic Components for BI (WLS Managed Server, Managed Server SSL and NodeManager). installation Failed. Exiting installation due to data validation failure. Solution suggested on other post is below: your hosts file have duplicate name that point to two different IP addresses. 10.37.29.1 test1.xyz.com 10.10.10.1 test1.xyz.com But in my case, My host file has different entiries as shown below: 169.36.71.228 usl20027808.am.hedani.net usl20027808 169.36.72.9 usl2002788.am.hedani.net usl2002788 Please suggest!

In setDomainEnv.sh set debugFlag=false or you can just remove it.
NodeManager is a charm after that. it can take any number of ports.
Cheers !!

BAM. Track message payload inside dynamic send port

Somehow Biztalk 2010 BAM fails to track message payload inside dynamic send port. Messaging properties and Context properties (from our own property schema) are tracked correctly.
I'm using XMLTransmit with specified document schema property on the send port, but this does not help.
Tracking the same properties on Receive port is successful.
What could cause this kind of behavior?

I do not use ESB. There are only simple send ports. I have been trying to track message payload either from static and from dynamic sen ports. In both cases it does not track anything (only null values).
I've trying with simple solution: one send and one receive ports. No mapping or other stuff. Tracking profile had the same fields set, both with two ports mapped: one send, and one receive. Receive port line is filled with correct values from message, while
send port line stays empty (null).
What could cause such behavior?

How to configure Send Handler for BizTalk 2013 Dynamic Send Port on deployment?

Hi,
I do know how to manually configure a send handler for a dynamic send port in BizTalk 2013 Administration console. Though, once you export your application's configuration to a binding file, the dynamic send port's configuration does not
contain any information regarding the send handler. When you try to use this binding file when deploying your application your dynamic port's send handler falls back to the default host instance.
So my question is, how could we automate this process to avoid manual step in a dynamic port configuration during deployment?
Thank you,
--Vlad

Hey vlad,
As discussed at work in the office.. I woudl take the powershelll approach for now as a workaround. Here's a trivial script for my local dev box (all in one biztalk & SQL) (must be run in an x86 powershell session):
param
[string] $bizTalkDbServer = ".",
[string] $bizTalkDbName = "BizTalkMgmtDb",
[string] $fileHostInstance = "SendingHost",
[string] $sendPortName = "sm_dynamic_sp_test"
[System.reflection.Assembly]::LoadWithPartialName("Microsoft.BizTalk.ExplorerOM") | Out-Null
$catalog = New-Object Microsoft.BizTalk.ExplorerOM.BtsCatalogExplorer
$catalog.ConnectionString = "SERVER=$bizTalkDbServer;DATABASE=$bizTalkDbName;Integrated Security=SSPI"
foreach($sp in $catalog.SendPorts)
if($sp.Name -eq $sendPortName)
  "Found send port $($sp.Name), analyzing send handler"
  foreach($sh in $sp.DynamicSendHandlers)
   if($sh.SendHandler.TransportType.Name -eq "FILE")
    if($sh.SendHandler.Host.Name -ne $fileHostInstance)
     "Changing $($sh.Name) send handler to '$fileHostInstance' from '$($sh.SendHandler.Host.Name)'"
     $sp.SetSendHandler("FILE", $fileHostInstance)
    else
     "Send handler for $($sp.Name) is already '$fileHostInstance' ignorning .. "
$catalog.SaveChanges()

Dynamic ALV: but with globally available dynamic table type

Hello,
I would like to create a dynamic node for a ALV and dynamic table types to fill and the ALV.
The ALV data can be changed so I need to read it again.
I have read all the threads about dynamic node create and i have no problem with it. I can create a structure and a table dynamically. thats also no issue for me.
But. I fill the ALV data in a method and read it in another method to save the changes in a data base table.
Thats also no problem
So where i need your help? I currently create the dynamic table and structure in both methods. That works, but why do the same thing twice?
I cant figure out by myself how to create a dynamic table/structure in a global way, so the dynamic table/structure is created once and then available in the whole WD4A view.
I tried is with a class type in se24 with reference to CL_ABAP_STRUCTDESCR but I cant make that run, because to access the type I created an attribute in se24 with reference to the class type that I now try in instance and fill in the method. But ABAP thinks that my attribute is not compatible anymore.
Any idea how to make a dynamic table globally available? That must be an ABAP god who can answer this question, hehe. So imagin me falling on my knees for the one who has an answer that really works
Kind regards,
Hendrik

This doesn't seem too difficult really. For a dynamic table you just need to declare the internal table as TYPE REF TO DATA.
Just more this declaration to the attributes of your Component Controller. So for instance in my component controller I have an attribute called i_data with the RefTo column checked and the associated type = DATA.
So now I could do the following:
create data wd_this->idata type table of (tablename).
Or however you are dynamically creating the table - maybe with TYPE HANDLE instead.
The point is that your dynamic table is now global to your entire component and you can read and write to it from different methods.
Is this what you were looking for? Without knowing more about your existing coding, it is difficult to say more.

Biztalk 2010 : Dynamic send Port Block : HTTP Adapter

Hi
I have a customer who makes an intensive use of the DefaultServerApp host instance.
All of his applications use this instance for dynamic send port ( HTTP send adapter)
The problem is sometimes the messages accumulate in the message queue of the HTTP Send adapter and I have to restart the host instance to fix the problem until it appears again a month later.
note: many messages are timed out , could this to be the root cause ?

Secondary messagebox
-why !!!!
You have an issue in just one of the host instances. Where is this Secondary messagebox came into play? Is your database struggle with the load and does the message process
affect “all your processing in BizTalk”?
Or is this issue in host instance/design related. As you have many dynamic ports all of them will be using the default host instance. Some of these processes may have high
volume or high size messages so your host instance may be struggling to process the message and could cause the memory/process usage related issue. Exactly for these reasons Microsoft has given an option to tweaking the host processing and throttling setting.
Adding an additional messagebox database would be overdo for your issue.
Consider tweaking the throttling settings. If the process memory was increasing
continuously and if your investigation boils down to process memory usage for this issue, consider tweaking the
Process memory usage and Physical memory usage throttling thresholds.
Consider the suggestions from this MSDN article..
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918643
Also consider about adding more RAM, physical memory.
As I mentioned in my earlier post, run the messagebox viewer tool and review its reports for health of the server.
Also ensure you have the latest version of Cumulative Update for your version of BizTalk installed. In some of the CUs, fix for memory leak has been included.
Another suggestion, review the design where you have so many dynamic ports. May be some of these processes have high volume or high size messages and since all use the dynamic
ports hence the same host instance you could have this issue. Consider to move away from dynamic port for some of the processes, if you find either high volume or high size message processing.
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Dynamically the buttons should display as per input no's.

Hi friends,
I have BSP with 1 page .
Input is Enter No
If i enter 3 as input my layout should display 3 buttons with name BUTTON1 BUTTON2 BUTTON3
If i enter 1 as input my layout should display 1 buttons with name BUTTON1
Means dynamically the buttons should display as per input no's.
Suggestion pls.
I am displaying my button like below
<input type=submit name="onInputProcessing(B1)" value=" BUTTON1">
Suggestion pls.
Moosa

Hi,
I have given the entire code here as mentioned the procedure by abinav
Layout
<%@page language="abap" %>
<%@extension name="htmlb" prefix="htmlb" %>
<htmlb:content>
<htmlb:page>
    <htmlb:form>
      <htmlb:inputField id            = "t1"
                        value         = "<%= value1 %>"
                        submitOnEnter = "X" />
      <%
        if value1 is not initial.
        data: text type string,
              no type n value '1'.
         do value1 times.
         concatenate 'BUTTON' no into text.
      %>
      <htmlb:button id     = "<%= sy-tabix   %>"
                    text   = "<%= text %>"
                    design = "small" />
      <%
        no = no + 1.
        enddo.
        endif.
      %>
    </htmlb:form>
</htmlb:page>
</htmlb:content>
OninputProcessing
DATA: event TYPE REF TO cl_htmlb_event,
      input TYPE REF TO cl_htmlb_inputfield.
event = cl_htmlb_manager=>get_event( runtime->server->request ).
input ?= cl_htmlb_manager=>get_data( request = runtime->server->request
                                         id = 't1'
                                         name = 'inputfield' ).
IF input IS NOT INITIAL.
value1 = input->value.
ENDIF.
and define page attribute value1 type n.
I hope it helps you...

Healthservice.exe was flooding all TCP "ephemeral ports" from 49152 to 65535

Issue :
DCOM errors(Event 10009) causing in backup failures.
Investigation : Healthservice.exe
was flooding all TCP “ephemeral ports” from 49152 to 65535, generating a TCP/IP port exhaustion, while trying to login into the SQL Database. After I disabled the System
Center Management service, the backsups complete without any issue.
Background : Server hosts Sharepoint SQL databases. SCOM Agent 2007 R2 with CU4 is installed.
Thanks, Harry :-)

Hi,
May I know if there was any changes before the issue occurred, such as MP imported?
Regarding the error, please check it referring to the following post:
HP Storage MP v 2.0: DCOM EventID 10009 every 5 seconds in the System Log of the RMS
http://thoughtsonopsmgr.blogspot.com/2012/05/hp-storage-mp-v-20-dcom-eventid-10009.html
Meanwhile, if the issue occurs in Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 R2, please also try the following:
A hotfix is available to enable the Association Cookie/GUID that is used by RPC over HTTP to also be used at the RPC layer in Windows 7 and in Windows Server 2008 R2
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2619234
Thanks.
Nicholas Li
TechNet Community Support

Set Custome pipeline for dynamic send port in orchestration

I need to assign custom pipeline for dynamic send port in an orchestration .

The option is available in the Port Configuration wizard
Thanks, Murugesan M - Please Mark as the Answer, if this answers your question. Please vote as helpful, if this post is helpful.

Dynamic (ephemeral) Port Allocation Global or per-IP?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for