Dynamic SAP BPC 10 member formula

Hi experts,
I'm using a hierarchy in a dimension and I need to aggregate members data using other functions than a simple Sum. For example :
Dimension X with the following structure :
PARENT
    Parent 1
       Member 1
       Member 2
    Parent 2
       Member 3
       Member 4
Dimension Measures that contains members like:
KPI1
KPI2
KPI3
The functions used to calculate KPIs for each parent in the dimension X change. Which means :
Parent1 = Function1 (Member 1, Member 2) for KPI1
Parent1 = Function2 (Member 1, Member 2) for KPI2
We can also find that KPI1 = FUNCTION (KPI1, KPI2)
How can this be achieved ?
Thanks
Maha

Hi Vadim,
Thanks for your reply
I need to calculate different KPIs for different Companies. The COMPANY dimension has the following structure :
XXXX
SUNADEL
     MBKI
     KSB
SUTTAS
      BSD
      SDCA
The first KPI is the production of a certain material. For SUNADEL, it equals the production of MBKI + 2*the production of KSB
The second KPI is the average of production. For the same company SUNADEL, it equals (the production of MBKI + the production of KSB)/2
What I m trying to explain is that the aggregation is not always a sum for the same parent, it depends on the KPI. Is this possible ?
Thanks
Maha

Similar Messages

Dynamic calc member formula problem

Hello Gurús!
We are using a member called "Full Year" that is a Dynamic calc with a member formula that calls another dynamic calc. For any reason, it is not working when we try to retrieve it from Excel Add-in.
Any ideas? Any problem for put a Dynamic Calc as member formula of antoher Dynamic calc?
Thanks for your time!
Regards,
Ariel

that can be the problem, depending on what dimension they are in, the order the two pass occurs could couse you issues. In cases like this I've had to put the entire calculation into the member I wanted to calculate and bypass the dependency

Retrieval performance become poor with dynamic calc members with formulas

We are facing the retrieval performance issue on our partititon cube.
It was fine before applying the member formulas for 4 of measures and made them dynamic calc.
The retrieval time has increased from 1sec to 5 sec.
Here is the main formula on a member, and all these members are dynamic calc (having member formula)
IF (@ISCHILD ("YTD"))
IF (@ISMBR("JAN_YTD") AND @ISMBR ("Normalised"))
"Run Rate" =
(@AVG(SKIPNONE, @LIST (@CURRMBR ("Year")->"JAN_MTD",
@RANGE (@SHIFT(@CURRMBR ("Year"),-1, @LEVMBRS ("Year", 0)), @LIST("NOV_MTD","DEC_MTD")))) *
@COUNT(SKIPNONE,@RSIBLINGS(@CURRMBR ("Period")))) + "04";
ELSE
IF (@ISMBR("FEB_YTD") AND @ISMBR ("Normalised"))
"Run Rate" =
(@AVG (SKIPNONE, @RANGE (@SHIFT(@CURRMBR ("Year"),-1, @LEVMBRS ("Year", 0)),"DEC_MTD"),
@RANGE (@CURRMBR ("Year"), @LIST ("JAN_MTD", "FEB_MTD"))) *
@COUNT(SKIPNONE,@RSIBLINGS(@CURRMBR ("Period")))) + "04";
ELSE
"Run Rate"
=(@AVGRANGE(SKIPNONE,"Normalised Amount",@CURRMBRRANGE("Period",LEV,0,-14,-12))*
@COUNT(SKIPNONE,@RSIBLINGS(@CURRMBR ("Period"))))
+ "Normalised"->"04";
ENDIF;
ENDIF;
ELSE 0;
ENDIF
Period is dense
Year is dense
Measures (normalised) is dense
remaining all sparse
block size 112k
index cache to 10mb
Rertrieval buffer 70kb
dynamiccalccahe max set to 200mb
Please not that, this is partition cube, retriving data from 2 ASO, 1 BSO underline cubes.

I received the following from Hyperion. I had the customer add the following line to their essbase.cfg file and it increased their performance of Analyzer retrieval from 30 seconds to 0.4 seconds. CalcReuseDynCalcBlocks FALSE This is an undocumented setting (will be documented in Essbase v6.2.3). Here is a brief explanation of this setting from development: This setting is used to turn off a method of reusing dynamically calculated values during retrievals. The method is turned on by default and can speed up retrievals when it involves a large number of dynamically calculated blocks that are each required to compute several other blocks. This may happen when there is a big hierarchy of sparse dynamic calc members. However, a large dynamic calculator cache size or a large value of CALCLOCKBLOCK may adversely affect the retrieval performance when this method is used. In such cases, the method should be turned off by setting CalcReuseDynCalcBlocks to FALSE in the essbase.cfg file. Only retrievals are affected by this setting.

SAP BPC - Recursive Dimension Member Formulas

Hi BPC community,
We have a customer requirement to create recursive dimension member formulas. Has anyone dealt with this topic before?
Example:
Account A = Account B * .05
Account B = Account A + Account C.
Account D = Account B * .10
Thanks,
Jeff Holdeman
EPM RIG

Hi Nicolas,
Thanks for pointing us in the right direction. The math actually turns out a little different, as I think you slipped a decimal. But none the less, your contribution is MUCH appreciated.
Here is the proposed solution. For more details, we also need to utilize the solve_order parameter to force the system to calculate the dimension formulas in the proper sequence. Zero is the highest priority.
Assume...
A = B * .05
B = A + C
C = input
D = B * .10
Therefore solving for B...
B = (B * .05) + C
B = .05B + C
B - .05B = C
.95B = C
B = (1 / .95) * C
And...
D = (1 / .95) * C * .10
For example, if C = 100...
B = (1 / .95) * 100 = 105.26
A = 105.26 * .05 = 5.26
D = 105.26 * .10 = 10.53
I'll assume there are two accounts for "C"; one for input and one as a formula.
[Account].[C] = [Account].[C input][, solve_order = 1]
[Account].<b> = [Account].[C] * 1 / .95[, solve_order = 2]
[Account].[A] = [Account].<b> * .05[, solve_order = 3]
[Account].[D] = [Account].<b> * .10[, solve_order = 4]
Edited by: Jeffrey Holdeman on Aug 11, 2008 5:58 PM

BPC NW 10 Member formula

Hello Experts,
I have a BPC NW 10 requirement to calculate member formula for Account Dimension.
SALES_TTM(Total Sales - 12months Trailing) which is SALESTOT+(SALESTOT, Prior Period)+(SALESTOT, Prior Period 2)+(SALESTOT, Prior Period 3)+(SALESTOT, Prior Period 4)+(SALESTOT, Prior Period 5)+(SALESTOT, Prior Period 6)+(SALESTOT, Prior Period 7)+(SALESTOT, Prior Period 8)+(SALESTOT, Prior Period 9)+(SALESTOT, Prior Period 10)+(SALESTOT, Prior Period 11).
SALESTOT member is not a Base Member.Its a node which has several Base members in it.
How Can I write a Member Formula for the above requirement?
Thanks

Hello Vadim,
I was able to write the formula and test it properly using LAG functionality for time,
I have a similar requirement for YTD model and posted it in a seperate post.I have written a formula but couldnt make it dynamic to make it work for all years
Can you please help?
Below is the link
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3607494
Thanks

Dynamic Hierarchy - SAP BPC 7.5 MS

Hello everyone. I am running SAP BPC 7.5 on the Microsoft Platform.
The issue I am running into is that I have children entities that have two parent entities. The Entity Dimension has our traditional organization chart. However, our reports require an alternate hierarchy.
Example:
Company A is a child of Company ABC in the org chart
however for reporting purposes
Company A is a child of Company XYZ
I need to pull in company XYZ in the report so that Company A is reported as being a part of it.
I need to be able to set up something using a dimension property that will allow me to pull in this hierarchy into our reports, WITHOUT using expansions.
The reason I cannot use expansions is some of the report will use the traditional org chart and the other portion of the report will use the alternate hierarchy.
I there some way to do this without using expansions?
I have setup a dimension property called "GROUP" that identifies the alternate hierarchy. However, the only way I know to pull it in the report is through the use of expansions in the "MembersSet" filter.
I have also tried to use the "Dynamic Hierarchy Editor" only to discover that you have to define hierarchies for specific time periods, and still use expansions.
Any suggestions? I feel like I am missing something.
Thank you in advance.
Will

Hi Will,
From what you describe I think an alternate (second/ H2) hierarchy is needed.
You can try adding a second hierarchy to your Entity dimension member sheet (PARENTH2) to see if that meets your requirement.
You can only create reports that have a hard-coded row or column key range or a dynamic row/column key range defined in the memberset field.
HTH,
John

Why not displayed new member in dimension sap bpc?

Good day guys
I have the following problem:
Add new members to a dimension but not displayed.
example: DIMENSION(inputcurrency) added MEMBER: MXN (Mexican Pesos); when I excel interface I can not see the new member, before this process the dimension and active AppSet.
that could be?
Use SAP BPC 7.5 SP8

Hi Bish,
Without processing a dimension the data should no go to the database. If you modify the the dimension and you want those new members in report you have to process that dimension. And if you save that dimension after modification its save the members in application sever. while retrieving the data it pick up from the database layer not from application layer, So the on fly calculation are stored in application layer( Like conversion files, Transformation files, script logics and Member formulas). So if you want the new members in report you have to process. Its by SAP design it self.
After modification of dimension no need to logoff and login every time. In order to avoid that option we have a anothe solution that is Activate Metadata Cache option.
In order to use that go to EPM--> User OPtions---> Activate metadata Option
You can clear the metadata cache. When the cache is cleared, the structure of the data source you are connected to is synchronized with the structure copied locally; which means that the members of dimensions that have been added, modified or deleted in the data source are loaded.
For more details related to Metadata option go to the EPM 10 Office Addin User Guide document which is available in google free of cost
Regards,
Saida Reddy G

Help needed in BPC 10 Member Formula

Hello Experts,
We are in BPC 10 NW SP 11.
Facing below error in report for Ratios hierarchy after
member formula is built.
Formulas is related to ratio
IIF([ACCOUNT_GL].[RE_IREV]=0, NULL, [ACCOUNT_GL].[RE_IAADJ]/[ACCOUNT_GL].[RE_IREV]);SOLVE_ORDER=10
RE_IREV is Income node
RE_IAADJ is expense node.
I have tried formula by removing square brockets for ACCOUNT
DIM member. Still no success.
Surprisingly, same formula, same hierarchy works fine in
another Model.
I have also compared measures in both the models, both are
identical.
Error in the report as below.
Server message:
code: UJO_READ_EXCEPTION_018
severity: error
description: MDX statement error: Value RE_IREV
/CPMB/WADNXJI for characteristic /CPMB/WADNXJI unknown
log id: KoFXP08mHM3X08002fJHZW
DATAVALUE: Value RE_IREV /CPMB/WADNXJI for characteristic
/CPMB/WADNXJI unknown
MDX: WITH MEMBER
[Measures].[PERIODIC] AS 'IIF([/CPMB/WADNXJI
PARENTH2].[2/CPMB/ACCTYPE]="INC",-[Measures].[/CPMB/SDATA],IIF([/CPMB/WADNXJI                 PARENTH2].[2/CPMB/ACCTYPE]="EXP",[Measures].[/CPMB/SDATA],IIF([/CPMB/WADNXJI
PARENTH2].[2/CPMB/ACCTYPE]="AST",([Measures].[/CPMB/SDATA],
CLOSINGPERIOD([/CPMB/WADBQQD
PARENTH1].[LEVEL02])),IIF([/CPMB/WADNXJI                 PARENTH2].[2/CPMB/ACCTYPE]="LEQ",-([Measures].[/CPMB/SDATA],
CLOSINGPERIOD([/CPMB/WADBQQD
PARENTH1].[LEVEL02])),-[Measures].[/CPMB/SDATA]))))' SOLVE_ORDER=3 MEMBER [/CPMB/WADNXJI                 PARENTH2].[RE_ALAE_RATIO] AS
'IIF([/CPMB/WADNXJI
PARENTH2].[RE_IREV                         /CPMB/WADNXJI]=0,
NULL, [/CPMB/WADNXJI
PARENTH2].[RE_IAADJ
/CPMB/WADNXJI]/[/CPMB/WADNXJI                 PARENTH2].[RE_IREV                         /CPMB/WADNXJI])'
SOLVE_ORDER=10 SELECT NON EMPTY {[/CPMB/WADBQQD                 PARENTH1].[2013.Q1                         /CPMB/WADBQQD]
,[/CPMB/WADBQQD
PARENTH1].[2013.Q2                         /CPMB/WADBQQD]
,[/CPMB/WADBQQD                 PARENTH1].[2013.Q3                         /CPMB/WADBQQD]
,[/CPMB/WADBQQD
PARENTH1].[2013.Q4                         /CPMB/WADBQQD]
,[/CPMB/WADBQQD
PARENTH1].[2013.TOTAL                      /CPMB/WADBQQD] } * {[/CPMB/WADNXJI                 PARENTH2].[RE_ALAE_RATIO]
,[/CPMB/WADNXJI
PARENTH2].[RE_ALL_RATIOS                   /CPMB/WADNXJI] ,[/CPMB/WADNXJI                 PARENTH2].[RE_COMBINED_RATIO]
,[/CPMB/WADNXJI
PARENTH2].[RE_EXPCOMM_RATIO] ,[/CPMB/WADNXJI                 PARENTH2].[RE_LOSS_RATIO]
,[/CPMB/WADNXJI
PARENTH2].[RE_OTHERCOMM_RATIO] ,[/CPMB/WADNXJI                 PARENTH2].[RE_STAT_COMB_RATIO]
,[/CPMB/WADNXJI
PARENTH2].[RE_STAT_EXP_RATIO] ,[/CPMB/WADNXJI                 PARENTH2].[RE_TOT_EXP_RATIO]
,[/CPMB/WADNXJI
PARENTH2].[RE_TOT_LOSS_RATIO] ,[/CPMB/WADNXJI                 PARENTH2].[RE_ULAE_RATIO] } ON
0 from
[/CPMB/WAMSZKS/!!O/CPMB/WAMSZKS]
WHERE ( [Measures].[PERIODIC] ,[/CPMB/WAD3OFZ                 PARENTH1].[ACTUAL]
,[/CPMB/WAD0VHV
PARENTH1].[ALL_CHANNELS                    /CPMB/WAD0VHV] ,[/CPMB/WAD021F                 PARENTH1].[LEGAL                           /CPMB/WAD021F]
,[/CPMB/WADME7W                 PARENTH1].[ALL_DATASRC                     /CPMB/WADME7W]
,[/CPMB/WAD0DZ0
PARENTH1].[FGI
/CPMB/WAD0DZ0] )
V1:Value RE_IREV /CPMB/WADNXJI for characteristic /CP
V2:MB/WADNXJI unknown
V3:
V4:
Thanks,
Senoy

Hello Vadim,
Thanks for the reply.
I am able to process ACCOUNT_GL dimension.
Also, I am using standard TIME dimension.
I found that the virtual provider(created by using source of data for my model) too is showing the error, when I place above member formula.
I am attaching the error messae when I try to do list records in the virtual provider.
When I remove the member formula, everything is fine
Thanks

SAP BPC 7.5 NW SP15 - Dimension member descriptions are missing

Hi Expert,
We are using SAP BPC 7.5 NW SP 15, we use admin and client in spanish language see image attached
All users see through BPC CLIENT for Excel in spanish mode both ID and descriptions but when we added new user it can´t, just it can see ID member. We refresh Dim Cache member from client side but nothing happens.
We reprocess All dimensions through BPC Admin Client in spanish mode and doesn´t have any efect in dimension description?
is there any issue with this?
please give an advice to follow,
Thanks for your answer.
regards.

Hi Roberto,
thanks for your anwser
We checked though BW and saw it that long descriptions were set in Spanish language key which is the same language as BPC for Excel was openend.
As solution we checked at UJA3_USER_LANGU table, we notice that users in which descriptions are missing were registered in English language, therefore we deleted this user and its language and then was recreated those users through BPC ADMIN client.
Thank you,
Giovanni

How to use Dynamic Time Series YTD on a calc script / member formula?

Hi,
I activated Dynamic Time Series on Essbase and would like to use the YTD function of a measure for a certain month.
I tried to use
MeasureName->YTD(Dec)
MeasureName->Y-T-D(Dec)
But couldn't use it to syntax problems. How can I call this function instead of using @Accum or @SumRange?
Thank you
Edited by: Icebergue on 10/Ago/2011 11:07

I could be wrong, but I don't think you can use DTS members in calc scripts or member formulas. As you probably know, they can be used in Financial Reports, SmartView and Excel Add-in.
You can create an alternate hierarchy in your Time dimension though:
Jan (YTD): Jan ->Jan is being a shared member
Feb (YTD): Feb+Jan (YTD) ->Both Feb and Jan (YTD) are being a shared members
Dec (YTD): Dec+Nov (YTD) ->Both Dec and Nov (YTD) are being a shared members
Cheers,
Mehmet

Execution order: Business Rule vs. Dynamic Member Formula

Hi,
I have a problem with a calc rule that calculate percentage of a list of account in comparison with other account (Ce10) as below
FIX (list of account restricted here, @IDescendants(YearTotal),....)
"Percentage"
(IF (@ISUDA(Account,"Ce10"))
"Percentage" = "NA CE"/"NA CE"->"CE10"; //Here the percentage member and "NA CE" member in the same dimension
ENDIF)
ENDFIX
When I run the rule, the result is ok with the Months. But in the Quater and YearTotal, it's automatically aggregate to a wrong result as the YearTotal is dynamic calc (e.g: Jan: 10%; Feb: 10%; Mar: 10% => Q1: 30%). So I thought it because the Rule is executed first (Q1=10%) but after that, the dynamic aggregation of Year is executed so Q1 is aggregated as 30%.
So how to fix Q1 = 10% as expected result. I did study on two pass calculation but it seem can not apply on this isssue. I searched for "back calculation" also but I still didn't find any solution for this.
Please help me on this.
Thanks.

Thanks JM for quick responding. The problem here is "Percentage" is not a account's member.
To make the question more clearly, I'll explain the rule:
There's a list of account A: A1, A2,...,An
and a list of account B: Ce10, Ce20, ..., Ce90
There is a mapping n-1 between these two lists. For example, A1, A2 is mapped to Ce10, A3 to A5 is mapped to Ce20 and so on. I do it by assigning UDA (e.g: A1 {Ce10}, A2 {Ce10}...)
And the rule is used to calculate percentage of accounts of list A in comparison with equivalent account in list B. So the percentage can not be account member. It's the reason why I can not use member formula and two pass calc here.
Regards,
Huy Van
Edited by: Huyvtq on Jan 9, 2013 9:50 PM

Issue in Member Formula after enabling parallelization

Hi all,
System Details :
                SAP BW      - 731 Release - SP9
               CPMBPC     - 801 Release - SP4
               EPM Excel - 10.0 SP 15 Patch 1
Model Details :
              Periodic Model
Background Information :
          Sometimes back I had a performance issue in my BPC 10.0 report. So I implemented the steps mentioned in the SAP NOTE 1854228. After this, the report performance increased very signifiacntly.
Issue Details :
     There are few reports where in the Column axis we were trying to fetch data of both Periodic and YTD Measure along with Time Period. and in the row Axis I have accounts.
     My Issue is if in a single report I keep accounts :
                        CATEGORY 1 - Don't have member formula
                         CATEGORY 2 - have member formula : but accounts used in the formula of member formula are of same account type
                         CATEGORY 3 - have member formula : but accounts used in formula are of different account types ( e.g mix of INC and AST )
     Then the values fetched for any accounts for YTD measure is same as Periodic Measure.
But If I separate this single report to 2 different reports, where
                    1. In one report I kept accounts of Category 1 & 2.
                    2. In 2nd report I kept accounts of Category 3
Then the values for both YTD and Periodic are same.
As an developer I can do this. But this creates problem when user creates some Adhoc reports, where they want all there category of accounts in a single report. So if any body has any idea about how to overcome this issue, then it's very much appreciated.

Thanks Valdim. I was really expecting some respose from you.
Example :
ANNUAL CHURN = ( Disconnection / Avg Base YTD ) * -12.
     Where Disconnection : EXP type account
                 Avg Base YTD : AST Type Account.
                                            = Avg Base Periodic / Month Num of Current Month.

MDX Statement error in sap bpc 10.1 admin when opening a report

I have restored a previously created environment that was built on the sap bpc 10.1 platform and am receiving the following errors when accessing my reports and clicking refresh. I also received an error when restoring the environment that says "Error occurred in expanding member formula". I don't believe these would be related but I am unable to access the member formulas in the model. I am however able to access all dimensions, etc. I am not able to create any new reports though. Any ideas on a solution.

Hi Kudzai,
The error you're getting in BPC 10.1 is because the environments were migrated from BPC 10.0 or older version using transaction UJBR and it was not migrated to 10.1 after the restore.
SAP Note 2052538 provides resolution for this. Please follow the instructions of Upgrade Guide for BPC NW 10.1:
Execute migration program UJT_MIGRATE_100_TO_101 to migrate 10.0 data to 10.1 if the restored environment was backed up from a BPC NW 10.0 system
Execute migration program UJT_MIGRATE_75_TO_101 to migrate 7.5 data to 10.1 if the restored environment was backed up from a BPC NW 7.5 system
Thanks
Rajesh

Problem with member formulas and allocation

Hi guys,
I am experiencing a problem I am not currently able to solve. I'm building a planning application in which
volumes can be inputed in different units of measure (5 are currently available). For example a user can input in liter or KG, and the
system converts this data in all the different units of measure available, executing a script logic after
the input (for every bas member is also stored a conversion factor, which is used by the logic for conversion).
Two are the major issues of this approach:
1) storing 5 different volumes for every SKU is consuming in term of disk and DB space;
2) script logic must be executed every time the user sends data and in some cases this could be time-consuming.
The solution I'm trying is to use member formulas in order to calculate different units of measure, storing
only one of these. However, this way lead to another problem: when I try to input data with a top-down approach, using BPC
ALLOCATION ENGINE, I cannot use the correct unit of measure as a driver for the spread.
For example, if I input volumes is KG, and the unit of measure stored is only liter, I cannot use nor KG as a driver (because is not stored,
but only a member formula) neither liter, because the spread using this driver would lead to a wrong result.
What I would like to do is to give the user the possibility to input in the desired unit of measure at an aggregated level and spread data
using the existing mix, which must be volumes with the same unit of measure used for input.
Does anyone has an idea that could help me?
Regards
Edited by: utenza pubblica Public on Oct 23, 2009 4:48 AM

hi
i found a solution for the Problem in another Forum
http://businessintelligence.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/hyperion-admin-l/dynamic-calc-formulas-not-refreshed-1719379?cv=expanded
The suggestion is
1. change the Member from Dynamic Calc to Store
2. Refresh (After these Step the Formulas where still out of sync)
3. change the Member from Store to Dynamic Calc
4. Refresh
After these Steps the Formulas are in sync again.
Kevin Kraft
Edited by: Kevin Kraft on Mar 25, 2009 12:33 PM

ABAP dump during workstatus chaning in SAP BPC 7.5

Hi, Experts
We are working with SAP BPC 7.5 Ramp-up version. We faced a problem - during changing workstatus the system generates ABAP Dump.
We checked ST22 with ABAP Dumps. It contains the following:
What happened?
    Error in the ABAP Application Program
    The current ABAP program "CL_UJW_WORK_STATUS_DAO========CP" had to be
     terminated because it has
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
ABAP errors are created in the following code:
FIELD-SYMBOLS:
        <fs_line> TYPE ANY.
CREATE DATA lr_line TYPE (i_tabname).
ASSIGN lr_line->* to <fs_line>.
l_where = 'APPSET = i_appset'. "#EC NOTEXT
LOOP AT it_dim_mem INTO ls_dim_mem.
    CONCATENATE
      l_where ' AND ' ls_dim_mem-dimension ' = ''' ls_dim_mem-member ''''
      INTO l_where RESPECTING BLANKS.
ENDLOOP.
*SELECT SINGLE * INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF es_lock_info FROM (i_tabname) WHERE (l_where).*
* fill lock information
CLEAR ls_ujw_statcode.
CALL METHOD me->read_status_code(
               EXPORTING i_appset = i_appset
                         i_status = es_lock_info-status
                         i_spras = 'E'
               IMPORTING es_ujw_statcode = ls_ujw_statcode ).
ABAP dump says that in "SELECT SINGLE * INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF es_lock_info FROM (i_tabname) WHERE (l_where).*" exist a dynamically specified column name which is unknown.
Does somebody have the same problems?
Regards,
Pavel

Hi Pavel,
This is obviously a bug and it looks like from the code block you copied into the forum that there is an issue with the actual select statements dynamic where clause. I haven't specifically seen this bug but I recommend you do an SAP Note search on the following component EPM-BPC-NW-WS (for work status) in your search criteria put the class name that you found in the dump. This should help you find whether or not a correction has been created (i.e. an SAP note) that solves your issue.
Cheers, Scott

Dynamic SAP BPC 10 member formula

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for