Dynamic vailability check not taking Reservation accumulation into account

Hi,
We have 2 production orders for which the availability check has been done initially and the situation is
Finished good has 1 component and the Plant stock of the component is 99 EA.No other receipts are in place.
Order1 for FG is for quantity of 100 EA
Order2 for the FG (at a later date than order1) is 1 EA
Post availaility check using COHV, Order1 is confirmed for 99 EA and is with MACM status and order2 has no commitment and is with MSPT status.
Dynamic availability check for CO27 in OMCP config points to the same checking rule we used during the intial material availabillity check.
In the Movement type config 261 movement type is assigned to dynamic avl.check - F Message in any case: E mess. for non-avail., otherw. S mess.
When we execute CO27 individually for the orders we can trap the error as per availability check commitments as we have seen earlier.
But when we try to input both orders together in CO27 and do a pick list confirmation the second order gets the component issue with the first one not getting posted (expected to be partially to the tune of 99 EA) thereby violating the availability check results ultimately.
Request your help in knowing whether this is the SAP design or am i missing some thing else?
Regards,
SRK

Query posted in the PP Forum and hence this is closed.

Similar Messages

Dynamic availability check not taking reservation accumulation into account

We have 2 production orders for which the availability check had been done and situation is
Finished good has 1 component and the Plant stock of the component is 99 EA.No other receipts are in place.
Order1 is for quantity of 100 EA
Order2(at a later date than order1) is 1 EA
Post availaility check using COHV, Order1 is confirmed for 99 EA and is with MACM status and order2 has no commitment and is with MSPT status.
Dynamic availability check for CO27 in OMCP config points to the same checking rule we used during the intial material availabillity check.
In the Movement type config 261 movement type is assigned to dynamic avl.check - F Message in any case: E mess. for non-avail., otherw. S mess.
When we execute CO27 individually for the orders we can trap the error as per availability check commitments as we have seen earlier.
But when we try to input both orders together in CO27 and do a pick list confirmation the second order gets the component issue with the first one not getting posted (expected to be partially to the tune of 99 EA) thereby violating the availability check results ultimately.
Request your help in knowing whether this is the SAP design or am i missing some thing else?

Query posted in the PP Forum and hence this is closed.

Table of contents file not taking book files into account

Hi everyone,
I've used Indesign's book panel to manage the chapters in a book that I've typeset. I set up the table of contents style (in a TOC document which is part of the books panel) and made sure that it used all the book chapters when compiling the table of contents by checking the option in the TOC styles diaglogue box.
For some reason, the table of contents is ignoring all of the styles in the chapter files so it's not including anything in the table of contents other than a few headings that are within the file that contains the table of contents.
I'm noticing that Indesign is creating a whole lot of duplicate files with a string of numbers appended to the file name, eg.
Newbook_Cha531549083577
These seem to duplicates of the chapter files but I have no idea why Indesign is creating them so I'm wondering whether I've got some corruption happening and whether this may be causing the problem with the table of contents.
Has anyone had a similar problem and if yes, is there any solution?
Really appreciate any advice.

Peter,
I'm having the same problem as gwh. The TOC won't go beyond the first document. All my style names are the same. I don't have style groups.
To make the book I began with one long document that included all the chapters. I broke it into chapters by copying and pasting into new .indd documents (each one created by Save As from the first) and adding all those documents to the book.
Generating the TOC from the one long .indd document works perfectly. I just can't get it to generate from the book (.indb) doc.
I have all the documents in the book open. I have the first one active (in front). I generate the TOC, and I get only the entries for the first document. Here's a screenshot of my TOC box. I must be missing something really simple, huh? (I'm using CS5)

Public Holiday calendar not to be taken into account for Sick Leave

Dear All,
I need help.
Public Holiday calendar not to be taken into account for Sick Leave.
Eg -When I employee applies for sick leave, the public holiday in between the dates shouldnt be considered. How can I configure this requirement.
Please help.
Regards,
Poornima

For that group, you need 2 counting rules:
- one for Holiday Class 0 (not a public holiday) and Day Work Schedule Class 0 (not a working day)
- one for Holiday Class 0 (not a public holiday) and Day Work Schedule Class 1 to 9 (a working day)
If you want, you can add an other one or two for Holiday Class 1 to 9 (public holiday)
extract from our T556C
2       1   10 Q      10 Sick leave deduct from quotas (incl personal/spec) XXXXX   X X    XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX X X        XX XX    100.00 100.00              1     1       10
2       1   10 Q      11 Sick leave deduct from quotas (incl personal/spec) XXXXX   X X    XXXXXXXXXX X          X X        XX XX      0.00    0.00              1     1       10
2       1   30 Q      10 Special leave with pay (with quotas deduction)     XXXXX   X X    XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX X X        XX XX    100.00 100.00              1     1       30
2       1   30 Q      11 Special leave with pay (with quotas deduction)     XXXXX   X X    XXXXXXXXXX X          X X        XX XX      0.00    0.00              1     1       30

[svn] 4746: User-submitted patch for SDK-16147 - HaloBorder does not take border widths into account when drawing background with rounded corners .

Revision: 4746
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2009-01-29 15:36:59 -0800 (Thu, 29 Jan 2009)
Log Message:
User-submitted patch for SDK-16147 - HaloBorder does not take border widths into account when drawing background with rounded corners.
Bugs: SDK-16147 (bug), SDK-16963 (patch)
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16147
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16147
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16963
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/branches/3.x/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/skins/halo/HaloBorder.as

Items to list in invoice but not wanted to post into accounting

Hi - We have a BOM, both header and components are price related. We want header material to have net value as a sum of all component's net value, and we wanted to bring all the components into invoice (Del Related) but only header material will be posted into accounting but not the components. We want components to show in invoice but not into accounting. Any ideas to complete this need??
Reg
Siva

Hi Siva,
Please refer to note 77414, situation 1 for this.
If you want the VPRS also cumulated on the main item, you would also need to implement the solution
from note 352441.
The note explains the solution by taking item category TAN & ZTAN as an example.
Please implement accordingly based on your own item categore.
Regards,
Alex

ABST not working for accumulated dep account

When I tried to run ABST for accumulated depreciation account, I am getting a message, 'account is not defined in GL component'. I have checked and this account does exist in the company code. I also checked the configuration and it is the correct account assigned for accumulated dep posting.
Please advice

Hi
The program RAABST01 can only check accounts defined as balance sheet
accounts in G/L and in AM. Can you kindly check that the account been
assigned as a balance sheet account in the IMG transaction AO90
(i.e., acquisition: acquisition and production costs).
Program RAABST01 checks fields T095-KTANSW (G/L account: down payments)
and T095-KTANZA (Bal. sheet account: Acquisition and production costs).
(You can also refer the documentation of the report RAABST01 in SE38)
Please review note 113670 and the documentation about RAABST01(in SE38).
Report RAABST01 only checks accounts which are balance sheet accounts.
Also the account has to be managed in FI AND in FI-AA as a balance
sheet account.
For FI-AA the account has to be defined in transaction AO90 as "Balance
sheet account : acquisition and production costs" (T095-KTANSW).
Furthermore, the Line Item Management must be switched on in the G/L
account master record.
Blaz

Target Value check not taking place

Hey Gurus,
In the MIC i have maintained the target value as 8. Now i have created an inspection plan and assigned this MIC to it. The inspection lot is getting generated at the time of GR, I am going to QA32 and recording the result for the lot generated. But when i am giving a value of 6 for that particular MIC, it is accepting it and no rejection is taking place. Can anyone tell me why this is happening and is there any config missing?
Regards,
Abhishek

Hi
For the Rejection/Acceptance system will check the Specifications limits of the MIC not the target value. So maintain the Lower and Upper Specs for the MIC in QS23 and Chk in QA32. The values out of the Lower or Upper Specs will be the Rejections.
Regards
Brahmaji

Master data check not working when loading into and ODS object

Hi guys,
we are loading transactional data into an ODS from a flat file.
In the infopackage, we have checked the option :
"Do not update data if no master data exists for a characteristic".
This option seems to be unreliable :
For some characteristics (it seems those loaded using transfer rules (routines)), incorrect data is still loaded into the ODS even if no entry exist in the associated infoobject master data table.
Any help appreciated.
Many thanks !
Pierre-Yves

Hi Dear,
please delete all the incorrect master data from the master data characteristic first and then try to uploading the data again .It should work, because there migth be some master data created when data were loaded with out the check before.
And please check whether all your characteristic info object are of master data , I mean that in the infoobject defination you have checked the master data check box on the info object. If you have only text then it might fail the master data check.
hope this help.
cheers,
balaji
Message was edited by: Balaji NS

Open sales orders not to be taken into account

Hi all,
As i was doing credit management....i have dechecked open orders in the Automatic credit control
still during credit check it picks up the open order value...
can anyone please suggest me how to avoid of calculating open order values....
Cheers,
Ram

Hi All,
Just saw all your replies, Thanks a lot for all those replies.
I have
            unchecked open items
            unchecked open orders
   and update group is 0000018.
Still system takes open order value into consideration.
As analysed found that if it is a Dynamic check even if you have unchecked open items & orders system still takes sales orders into consideration.
But here i have one more problem that when i change Horizon Date(which is now showing the current date) in FD32 and save it and again if i open it system shows me the current date only again how to change it??
Thanks in Advance.
Cheers,
Ram

Absence amount in infotype 2001 without taking wrok schedule into account

Hello
We are using CATS. For the purpose of available hours of an employee only the total of a week is needed. So for instance 25 h/week. We set up a week workschedule 25h/week with day schedule of 5 hours per day (hours evenly spread over the 25 hour week). However, I run into the problem that when I want to enter a leave in infotype 2001 for a certain day only 5 hours is allowed. But I need/want to enter 8 hours in infotype 2001 (user works 8, 8, 4, 5, 0).
If it works in infotype 2001 then it will also work in CAT2 and CAT6. Can anyone explain me how to set this up. I checked the following:
V_001P_D- Group Personnel Subareas for Attendances and Absences
V_T554S-Define Absence Types
V_554S_O - Determine Entry Screens and Time Constraint Classes
V_T551C - Define Counting Classes for the Period Work Schedule
V_503_E -Group Employee Subgroups for Time Quotas
V_001P_I - Group Personnel Subareas for Time Quotas
V_556R_B- Deduction rules for absence quotas
T556C- Counting rule
V_554S_Q - Assign Counting Rules to Absence Types
V_554Y_B and table V_T554Y
But I got lost somewhere in the tables above, the entries seem fine. I thought I had it with table V_554S_O where I set the availability on 9, but that did not help. The field "whole day" (P2001-ALLDF) is grayed out next to the field number of absence hours (P2001-STDAZ). We only us HR for CATS purposes.
I think I'm overlooking something for a particular setting in one of the above tables? I'm not an HR consultant so .... tabel V_556R_B is a very cryptic one for me. Further in table T556C I checked and unchecked "Work according to daily work schedule", but still no effect, also other combinations..... Also this table T556C I do not understand....
What I only need is specfic settings so that I can enter more absence hours in 2001 then in the workschedule is permitted. No updates in any other infotypes are necessary. From the help documentation it seems possible, but I don't seem to get it working....
Thanks in advance.
Kind regards
Mirko
Edited by: Mirko Polisini on Feb 8, 2009 9:50 PM

Hello,
We need to implement HR as lean en mean as possible, so time evaluation is no issue. Just want to post 0190 (Leave) in infotype 2001, 8 hours for a workschedule day that for instance only has 5 hours. Else user needs to create 2 lines in CAT2, 5 hours and another on same day with 3 hours. During CAT6 I get the problem that the 3 hours cannot be posted, besides the fact that this workaround is very userunfriendly.
Hoping that setting up infotype 2003 is not necessary, makes just things more complex (HR is just a means to an end for using CATS). Does it mean that I then need to create and absence type that is attached to infotype 2003? How does it work?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Kind regards,
Mirko

Curve fitting: Taking standard deviation into account

Hi,
Using LabView and Curvefitting. Following situation:
I have 15points including their standard deviation. I also have set up my curvefitting with my individual gaussian fitting. Basically the fitting looks good.
But how can i tell labview to take care about my already calculated standard deviation.
I always compare it with my OriginPro fitting (same gaussian equation). If I only take my data X and Y I get the same results.
But when I also indicate my standard deviation (in Origin), meaning X, Y and +-Y I get a more realistic result.
And that is what I would like to do with LabView aswell but there is no possibility to take my +-Y in account, isn't it?
(And no, the Origin VIs for LabView do not offer me this aswell. At least I don't see it )
Anyone a hint?
Thanks in advance
Solved!
Go to Solution.

altenbach wrote:
What is the "CurveFitting SubVi"?
sorry, meaning CurveFitting Express.vi
I have an equation like: a+b*10^(-c*(x-x0)^2)
a, b are offsets. x0 is the center of my gaussian curve. and i'm interested in c which describes the width of the gaussian function.
please have a look to the attached file:
- the red dots are mmy data plus the standard deviation (white dots)
- the green fitting curve is labview using the CurveFittingExpress
- the yellow fitting curve is using LabView Non-Linear Fitting with weigthing
- the blue fitting curve is the output I get using OriginPro. As you could see Origin is the only one taking care about the points at the edge (fitting inside the standard deviation)
that means in terms of c:
labview: 0.089
origin: 0.053
x0 is kinda similar. a,b, are different.
that's it.
Attachments:
Capture.PNG ‏58 KB

Updates to aliases seems not to be taken into account

Hello,
After having re-installed my email server on a macosx server snow leopard leopard, I tried to setup again my use emails accounts by modifying the aliases files, re-generate the aliases.db file, restarting the email service. Initially, I have an account where the email account is "firstnamelastname". I then added a line in the aliases file like:
<<
firstnamelastname: firstname.lastname, firstname, info
>>
Doing so, I should have 3 new email aliases
Then I re-generated the aliases database using "newliases" (or "postalias" to re-create the db).
Finally, I restarted the service and tested out the aliases.
results:
A trace in the smtp log like "No record for user firstname.lastname"
Any ideas? Thx
Regards,
Daniel

For that group, you need 2 counting rules:
- one for Holiday Class 0 (not a public holiday) and Day Work Schedule Class 0 (not a working day)
- one for Holiday Class 0 (not a public holiday) and Day Work Schedule Class 1 to 9 (a working day)
If you want, you can add an other one or two for Holiday Class 1 to 9 (public holiday)
extract from our T556C
2       1   10 Q      10 Sick leave deduct from quotas (incl personal/spec) XXXXX   X X    XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX X X        XX XX    100.00 100.00              1     1       10
2       1   10 Q      11 Sick leave deduct from quotas (incl personal/spec) XXXXX   X X    XXXXXXXXXX X          X X        XX XX      0.00    0.00              1     1       10
2       1   30 Q      10 Special leave with pay (with quotas deduction)     XXXXX   X X    XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX X X        XX XX    100.00 100.00              1     1       30
2       1   30 Q      11 Special leave with pay (with quotas deduction)     XXXXX   X X    XXXXXXXXXX X          X X        XX XX      0.00    0.00              1     1       30

Instance Time taking into account Daylight Standard Time

When scheduling a report, the instance time does not seem to take into account Daylight Standard Time. This is probably because the United States is different than the rest of the world. Any chance this will be fixed in upcoming releases? Either that or I can just wait a few more weeks for the world to catch up.
Instance Time: 3/27/2009 08:30:21
Actual Time: 3/27/2009 09:30:21

Hi Mike,
You are correct, the times you mention do not take the early daylight savings time change into account.
You should see the times become correct again when we hit the original time change date which I think would have been Sunday April 5 this year.
Cheers,
Steve

Movement type 281, scrap not taken into account

Dear Experts,
We have a BOM with 100 components transfered into a project network with transaction CN33.
In the BOM, on item level, we have stated component scrap %.
MRP takes these component scrap % into account.
However, if we confirm a project with transaction CN25 the proposed/booked goods movement 281 does not take the scrap % into account.
Example material BOM A (base quantity 100) contains component B (quantity 100 and component scrap 10%). MRP calculates with requirement 100 for material BOM A a requirement of 110 for component B. However, if we explode material BOM A to a project with transaction CN33 and we book the confirmation with transaction CN25 the the proposed/booked goods movement 281for component B is 100 (and not the desired 110).
We would like to take the component scrap % into account at goods issue of the project.
Is there a setting in customizng or the material masterfor this (or is the only option to use two BOM types for this)?
regards, Herman Alkemade

Hi Alex,
The problem is the Apply button doesn't become active and if you click the O.K bottom the dialog box closes and the setting doesn't change, my work around is to click on the Trace Fixed radio button and then Trace Can be Move bottom again, this should activate the Apply. This is a known bug and it's in our system.
Tien P.
National Instruments

Dynamic vailability check not taking Reservation accumulation into account

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for