ECC 6.0 Upgrade - FI Posting (Payroll)

Hi,
We have gone for ECC 6.0 upgrade and face problem with FI Postings(Posting not cleared). We found out that in the new version there is a new node that got added up where we need to add all US taxes(Payroll US -> Posting to Financial Accounting ->Define WT posting attributes).
How can i find which all wage types are US tax related. I know there is one processing class 72, which define Employer / employee tax, but is there any other way i can find out.
Thank you
Sreeja

Hi Ted,
I am talking about GB payroll, so we have to defnitely maintain the tax wagetypes in the new table V_T7US3PRTXSYMKO. Apart from that do we need to do any other settings in FI. Because it is showing the Profit center not filled.
We have also maintained the v_t52swcodist .
-Swetha

Similar Messages

  • Performance Archival - Post ECC 6.0 Upgrade

    Hi All,
    Our team is working for Archival of many objects for a renowned client, who is in process of upgrading the system from ECC 5.0 to ECC 6.0 recently.
    Post upgrade (in development environment) we are experiencing significant slowdowns for certain objects. 
    Especially for the following:
    1. RV_LIKP (Deliveries)
    2. SD_VBAK (Sales orders)
    3. LE_HU (Handling units)
    All of the above objects are accessing table 'NAST' sequentially.
    However, they ran pretty well before the upgrade was done.
    Regards
    Mohinder Singh Chauhan

    Hey Mohinder,
                           ECC 6.0 sometimes is troblesome ..we also faced similar situations from BKPF and BSIS tables....largely depends upon the load on that table but index's are also sometimes problem...raise a SAP message take their advice.
    Raghav

  • 4.6 C to ECC 6.0 Upgrade Project Timeline Sheet in MPP format

    Dear all,
    We are now proposing our customer for the 4.6c to ECC 6.0 Upgrade.
    Our customer is currently in 4.6c/oracle 9i/HPUX 11 i. He wants to move to ECC 6.0.
    If you have the project timeline for the above Technical Upgrade, can you pl send it to me.
    If you don't have in MPP format atleast send me the Work Breakdown structure with timelines.
    I shall modity the same to our customer and submit
    Thanks & Regards
    Senthil
    [email protected]

    Preparation Phase* 6 days
    Kick Off Meeting 1 day
    Upgrade Project Procedures Preparation 1 day
    Prepare Upgrade Project Plan 1 day
    Technical Requirements Assessment 3 days
    Assess Training needs of Key-users & End-users 1 day
    Prepare Detailed Basis Activity List for DEV, QA & PRD 1 day
    Business Blueprint Phase 6 days
    Develop System Landscape Upgrade Plan 1 day
    Functional Requirement Checklist 1 day
    ABAP Development check list 1 day
    Develop detailed Training Procedures & Documentation for Key Users & End Users 1 day
    Identify Testing Scope & Scenarios 1 day
    Identify Authorizations Conversion to Roles for SAP ECC 6.0 2 days
    Develop Documents as per Basis Activity List 1 day
    Develop Authorization Matrix for Activity Groups to Roles Conversion 2 days
    Prepare Upgrade Deliverables Checklist 1 day
    Realization Phase 28 days
    Installation of Solution Manager 3.2 System 1 day
    Creation of New Development System for Upgrade Project (Homogenous System Copy - PRD) 2 days
    Upgrade to AIX & Oracle 10g, SAP ECC 6.0 on New Development Server 3 days
    Upgrade Frontend Software 4 days
    Perform SPAU & SPDD Corrections 5 days
    Perform ABAP Development & Corrections 10 days Perform Authorizations Conversions and corrections after upgrade 8 days
    Perform Upgrade Testing for each Application Module 7 days
    Perform Unit & Integration Testing 6 days
    Perform Training to Key Users & End Users (Generic & Specific) 3 days
    Upgrade to AIX, Oracle 10g, SAP ECC 6.0 on Quality System 1 day
    Homogenous System Copy of PRD to New Quality & Upgrade to AIX, Oracle 10g & SAP ECC 6.0 2 days Perform Testing in Quality System 3 days
    Testing by end users on Quality System 1 day
    Production Realization & Go-Live Phase 6 days
    Upgrade to Production System Operating System to AIX (after close of business hours - 23:00) 1 day
    Oracle Upgrade to 10g (after close of business hours - 23:00) 1 day
    SAP Release Upgrade to ECC 6.0(Downtime Minimized - Downtime occurs in non-business hours) 2 days
    User Acceptance Testing 1 day
    Production System Go-Live 1 day
    Post Go-Live Support 14 days
    Post Go-Live Support 14 days Note: This is high level plan subject to change during Business Blue Print Phase 0 days
    This is taken from a post in Ittoolbox, May be this is generic. Hope you can tailor this to meet your requirements.

  • Urgent : Posting Payroll results from legacy system to SAP Fi /C0

    Hi Experts,
                A client requirment is such that they have to post payroll results to FI/Co
                They are not using SAP HR- Payroll module . They use their own payroll 
                 processing system . 
                 Please tell what would be the best way of doing so 
                  Help is urgently required
    Nidhi

    To be more specific, Pavani is referring to create a new inbound - custom program, which can create IDOCs in SAP system and transfer the data to FI - CO module.
    If your client has all the infrastructure for a new interface development, like XI system or IBM - Mercator system, Out bound interface for Third party payroll system, Interface - ABAP team, then it could be planned to develop the SAP inbound interface.
    Hope this helps.
    Narasimha

  • Screens not working in ECC 6 after upgradation from 4.6c.

    Hi,
    The custom developed screens which where developed in 4.6c version is not working properly in ECC 6 after upgradation.Do i have to make any more changes for this .? If anyone have an idea please help me in this issue.The custom developed things are an extended functionality we have done to r/3.
    Regards,
    jinesh kumar c.

    Hi,
    Check the Transportatation Logs in STMS for the programs/screens and check whether they are successfully tranported or not?
    Because some times we get Dynpro errors for transportation of the screens.
    Reward if useful.
    regards,
    Anji

  • ALE error while posting payroll data

    Hi all,
    We are trying to set up payroll posting via ALE interface. We have done the following settings
    1. Distribution model setup with filters on for standard bapi's
    2. Partner profile setup
    3. RFC destination setup
    When we try to post payroll data,it was returned with the following errors
           RFC destination is not maintained for object BUS6001 and method PRECHECKPAYROLLACCOUNTASSIGN
           The account assignment objects could not be checked
           RFC destination is not maintained for object BUS6004 and method CHECK
           The G/L account could not be checked
    We verified RFC destination and it is working fine. I have searched all possible links in SCN, but unable to get the solution.
    Can someone help in this issue?

    Hi,
    Using tcode pc_payresult please check whether the off-cycle payroll is executed again in period 06-2010. If yes then try to post off-cycle payroll separately (PC00_M99_CIPE - Create Posting Run) by entering "Off-Cycle Payroll Run" parameters. May be you will get an error while posting this off-cycle payroll because this payroll is already posted. In this case you will have to reverse the existing off-cycle posting and then post off-cycle payroll again.
    Once off-cycle payroll is posted, then you try to post normal monthly payroll.
    I hope your problem will be solved by doing the above work out.
    Regards,
    Waqas Rashid

  • Error in Posting Payroll to Accounting

    Dear HR Gurus,
    While posting the current month payroll for posting I get the following for some perdonnel numbers.
    Account with the following search key was not found: 1000HRF3100
    Required field GL_ACCOUNT was not transferred in parameter ACCOUNTGL
    Due to this posting is marked as incorrect and we can't proceed further. It's only happening for 2-3 employees.
    Your help will be highly appreciated.

    Dear Ramu,
    As you can see I posted the same question a few days ago and was encountering the same problem. I did some R&D along with a colleague and we nailed the problem down.
    In my case wrong symbolic account was assigned to wage type.
    Just follow my steps and you should be able to solve it.
    1)     Go to SPRO  Payroll  Payroll International (or choose if you have country specific) Reporting for Posting Payroll Results to Accounting  Activities in HR System
    2)     Click on maintain wage types and then Define Posting Characteristics of Wage Types.
    3)     Here you will see many wage types starting from u201C/u201D
    4)     One by one start checking Account Symbol assignment against each wage type and search for a wage type with account assignment symbol as 3100
    5)     Most probably it would be wage type /563 Claim from prev. period but thatu2019s not necessary change 3100 to your configured account symbol and transport request to production.
    Please award points if you find this helpful.

  • Posting Error - While Posting Payroll

    Hi Gurus,
    While posting payroll document, system is asking for GL Account, but when we assign HR Clearing Account in "Assign Technical Accounts", then system gives error that business area is missing line item 001 because document splitting is activated in FI.
    But ideally should not ask for the GL Account.
    Please tell me how can we solve the

    Hello Laxmi Narayan,
    Compare the payroll cluster with wage type mentioned in posting run... normally this type of error comes when infotype 9 i.e. Bank Details are not maintained etc.
    If helpful please award points
    Parag

  • Posting payroll results to FI : error F5 808

    Hi all,
    While posting payroll results to FI, we have the following error
    F5 808 Field Assign. is a required field for G/L account XXXX 1111111111
    XXXX is the company code
    1111111111 is the account number
    The field "Assignement" is set to required in table T004V(field status variants) in FI customizing and they can't change it to optional.
    is there a standard way to correct this? should we implement an exit user (definition SMOD_PCPO0001)?
    Thanks
    Karim

    Check the Posting Keys and Field Status Group through tcode OB41 and also check the below thread ...
    [where can i fill the "assign." when posting payroll to GL error f5808;
    Mohan

  • Error while posting payroll results to FI -IN PY

    Dear Consultants,
    When I am posting Payroll results to FI I am able to see the + amount and - amount is equal still it giving error and when I check PCP0 it says incorrect document generated. Please do needful.
    Error message: Error in document: HRPAY 0000000094 DEVCLNT200
    Error in document: HRPAY 0000000094 DEVCLNT200
    Message no. RW609
    Diagnosis
    Errors occurred when checking or posting the document
    Reference type = HRPAY
    Reference key = 0000000094
    Logical system = DEVCLNT200
    You can find the errors in the log.
    System Response
    The document cannot be posted.
    Procedure
    Remove the error in the document and create and post the document again.
    Second error message : Posting period 012 2012 is not open
    Message Text
    Posting period 012 2012 is not open
    Technical Data
    Message type__________
    E (Error)
    Message class_________
    F5 (Document Editing)
    Message number________
    201
    Message variable 1____
    012
    Message variable 2____
    2012
    Message variable 3____
    +
    Message variable 4____
    COSM
    Message Attributes
    Level of detail_______
    2 (Level of detail 2)
    Problem class_________
    Sort criterion________
    Number________________
      1
    Environment Information
    Item__________________
    000
    Please do needful, why this error is coming even though the +and - amount are equal.
    Regards,
    Naresh.KM

    Dear Siva,
    Sorry for delay in reply, as per my understanding I have done the assignment correctly, and the same arrears are coming in RT table as well as in payslip. When I checked the report RPDKON00 I have got a list of wage types assigned to GL account under Country grouping 40,
    A.Define wage type posting characteristics : I have copied arrears, carryforward wage types from their original wage types.
    Example : From Basic pay (which is using in infotype 0008)  I have copied Basic arrear wage type and basic carryforward wage type. and assigned the same in ZN42, ZN43, ZN44 and did the assignment.
    B. Define symbolic account : I have copied the symbolic account which is assigned to Basic wage type and copied the same and created new symbolic account and assigned to only basic arrear wage type which is coming in RT table.
    C .Assigned wage type to symbolic account : I have not assigned arrear wage type symbolic account to Original wge type in V_T53EL. Only Basic wage type symbolic account is mapped here.
    D Mapping symbolic account to G/L account : I have assigned the arrear wage type Symbolic account to the same GL which is assigned to original Basic wage type symbolic account.
    I have followed the same process for all the arrear wage types, and even the report RPDKON00 it is showing the same there is no error message.
    Apart from that I have created a New Symbolic account for /ZF5 and did all assignment, and assigned /ZF5 wage type symbolic account to /3F1 wage type symbolic account and GL mapping also same as /3F1.
    In Standard /552 arrear process there is no /ZF5 postings it will directly deduct the amount.
    Please suggest do I need to check any other area or how can I solve this error. kindly do needful.
    Regards,
    Naresh.KM 

  • Error while posting payroll results to FI  - Documents not getting created

    Hi all,
    While posting payroll results to FI for Dec 2011 a failure of our Production Server resulted in erroneous posting of payroll
    results. Posting run no: 1756 did not get posted at all though the run
    status shown was "document posted". The issue was resolved by resorting
    to manual posting of entries.
    Now we are unable to post payroll results for Jan 2012 for the same
    range of employee numbers for whom the manual posting was made for Dec
    2011. No posting documents are getting created.
    Kindly suggest how to resolve the issue.
    Regards,
    Sunil

    Hi All,
        I raised an OSS for the issue. SAP Support provided a solution for the problem. The solution involved cancelling a reversal which we had tried and failed followed by re posting the run no 1756. Our manual entries had to be reversed.The solution is given below.
        Please follow these steps:
    - Select the posting run 1756
    - Menu => Edit => Reversal => Reset after termination
    - After last step the status of the posting run should appear as
    'documents posted'
    - Go to transaction SM13
    - Select by user 8273 and date 02.01.2012
    - You should see an entry like this:
    400 8273 02.01.2012 15:26:57 @07\QEnqueues released@ Error
    - Select the entry and press the button 'Single test'
    - In case the system shows an error, please send the message back to us
    - In case the system shows no errors => press button 'Repeat update'
    - Then check in PCP0 and FI is the document has been correctly posted.
    Regards
    Sunil

  • SAP R/3 4.6 C to ECC 6.0 Upgrade using CU &UC method- Unicode conversion

    Basis Gurus
       I am working on upgrade from R/3 4.6C to ECC 6.0.
    ECC 6.0 upgrade completed( still in non Unicode).  Now I am in the process of Unicode conversion.
    I have used following methods for the upgrade.
    1. Combined Upgrade & Unicode conversion(CU & UC)
    2. Resource minimized( as I am doing it in Sandbox).
      As I understand I need to perform the DB export and Import now for the unicode conversion.
      According to the Upgrade document, First I need to run Export using R3load in ECC6.0(Non unicode)
      and then install Unicode system and import the same data file.
      My understanding was, when I choose, Resource minimized, I need to run Export and import
      in the same system.
      Can you please help me , whether I need another Unicode system for import ??
    Graham

    Hi,
    Dont get confused with upg strategy and unicode conversion.
    In general Upgrade strategy (either downtime-minimized/resource minimized)
    In unicode conversion you have export/import(exp/imp) of data concept
    In CU&UC approach you have to do in a streach to complete migrate from old release to new realease ECC 6.00.
    Using database independent (sapinst only) or Using database dependent (migration monitor or Distribution monitor)
    It can be done in 2 ways.
    If you dont have addtional server for unicode conversion
           1)you can either do exp on same hardware and take bakup and do import using the exp dump.
           2)Do exp on one server and prepare your target empty database on another server and complete imp of data.
    Hope this is clear.
    Regards,
    Vamshi.

  • ECC-600 EHP4 upgrade with VIRSAHR 520 700 - PREP_EXTENSION/ADDON_QCALC

    Hi
    We are getting following error at phase PREP_EXTENSION/ADDON_QCALC in the ECC 6.0 upgrade:
    3 ETN256 You want to install the following add-on components:
    3 ETN248 Component: "VIRSAHR" rel. "520_700", Support Package
    level: "0" (component type "A")
    3 ETN248 Component: "VIRSANH" rel. "520_700", Support Package
    level: "0" (component type "A")
    2 ETN085X"2. Adding Add-on Installation Queue" " " " " " "
    3 ETN262 Calculating queue part for add-on "VIRSAHR" rel. "520_700"
    3 ETN490 Use the Add-On installation package "SAPK-523EXINVIRSAHR"
    (type &4"AOX") for Add-On &2"VIRSAHR" rel.&3"520_700"
    3 ETN245 The following import prerequisites of OCS Package "SAPK-
    523EXINVIRSAHR" have not been met:
    3 ETN264 In the (alternatively) Requirement set "01":
    3WETN491 Required software component "SAP_HR" rel."600" is not installed2WETN543 OCS package "SAPK-523EXINVIRSAHR" does not match the current
    software component vector
    1 ETN214X."**************************************************"
    We have alreacy checked note 1002147, which clearly states that we have to include SAPK-523EXINVIRSAHR in the upgrade. SAP_HR is part of the upgrade.
    We have included SAP_HR and other Support Package as per the queue generated by Solution Manager, but we did not include VIRSAHR & VIRSANH Packages until we got to this phase. We then included these support packages in eps\in directory, but we are now getting this error now.
    Any ideas?
    Regards
    Chandu

    Hi
    This is what the solution provided by SAP Support:
    Quote:
    we have finally found the problem, it's a bug in the package upload
    functionality used by the upgrade. The consequence of this bug is that
    Support Packages whose EPS files (.PAT files) have a certain string in
    the name, namely the string 0000000 after the _ and before .PAT
    extension, are not properly uploaded to the ABAP system and hence are
    not visible or known to the upgrade.
    This bug will be fixed in the next upgrade tool fix, but in the meantimeyou can use the following workaround:
    Check your EPS/in directory after the CAR/SAR Archives of the SPs are
    extracted and rename all .PAT and .ATT files, which have a name like
    *_0000000.PAT (or *_0000000.ATT), by changing the string 0000000 to
    9000000. For example, for the VIRSANH SP SAPK-52302INVIRSANH rename the
    file VS30020106486_0000000.PAT to VS30020106486_9000000.PAT
    Afterwards, the upgrade will upload the informations about the SP
    properly and the SP can be included into the upgrade.
    Files:
    31/01/2007 07:32 329 VS30020106486_0000000.ATT
    31/01/2007 07:32 554,073 VS30020106486_0000000.PAT
    If these two files are renamed to e.g.
    VS30020106486_9000000.ATT
    VS30020106486_9000000.PAT
    the affected VIRSANH SP2 is uploaded correctly by the upgrade
    functionality and the SP inclusion of the VIRSANH SPs works.
    Sorry, as of now I cannot promise you a date when the tool fix will be
    available. I have found this bug only today in the evening (german time)and will discuss this with the responsible colleagues tomorrow.
    Afterwards, I will know more...
    Unquote:
    Hope this helps. We have decided against upgrading to 530_700 as it will involve upgrading GRC system and also new version has lot of new functionalities, which we like explore it after the ECC upgrade.
    Also, I would not suggest deleting VIRSAHR as all the config and customising done for VIRSAHR will be lost.
    Regards
    Chandu
    Edited by: Chandu Cheeti on Jan 17, 2010 11:19 AM

  • Error in WBS Element Hierarchy load after ECC 6.0 Upgrade

    Hi All,
    After ECC 6.0 Upgrade in R/3, we are doing test load in a Test server. While doing, we have encountered an issue with 0WBS_ELEMENT Hierarchy load. The message in the monitor is like below.
    "Node ID 00014240 has not been included in the hierarchy
    Message no. RH207"
    When I run the same hierarchy in another system which is not upgraded , it works fine.
    Anybody has faced similar kind of issues and can throw some light on this issue?
    Thanks,
    Mohan

    Try activating the Heirarchy in R/3 and re-trigger the load, error is very specific to structure of the hierarchy. there is a possibility that this Hierarcy could have got inconsistent after the upgrade.
    Thanks,
    Amit

  • Post payroll to FI server in another sap system.

    Hi Experts,
    In order to post Payroll result to SAP FI system which is distributed, i doing the following,
    1, I have done ALE setting and BAPI setting by t-code BD64, generate parnter profiles.
    2, I have  configured like  "define symbolic account" and "assign balance sheet accounts", "expense account'  in HR system.
    But i met error,
    Account with the following search key was not found: 6000HRF11102;
    Account with the following search key was not found: 6000HRC11002;
    Could you help me ? What can i check to solve the issue.
    Thank you !
    NT

    Hi Om,
    Thank you for your kind help.
    I set same charts of account in the two system. but I still met above error.
    So Could you check my setting, where exist configuration problem?
    1, In HR local system, Symbolic Account was mapped to balance sheet account and expense account.
    2, RFC configurarion have been done in both system.
    3, In "RFC Destinations for Method Calls",  already ssigned "Standard BAPI Destination" to Target local system.
    4, One Distribution Model and Distribute Views was created, its name is "HR_POST_FI".
    5, The following BAPI was involved in "HR_POST_FI".
    OBJECT NAME                       METHOD
    CompanyCode ->                  GetPeriod
    CostType ->            GetFixaccount
    AcctngServices->   DocumentDisplay, PreCheckPayrollAccountAssign
    AcctngEmplyeeExpnses->         Check, Post
    AcctngEmplyeeRcvbles->          Check, Post
    AcctngEmplyeePaybles->         Check, Post
    PayrollAccDocument->              Display_Acc
    6, Generated parnter profile for distribution view "HR_POST_FI".
    Except these two errrors message:
    Account with the following search key was not found: 6000HRF11102;
    Account with the following search key was not found: 6000HRC11002;
    There are some system information, they are;
    Account determination took place in logical system DEVCLNT190;
    Account assignment object check took place in logical system DEVCLNT190;
    Document check for G/L account document took place in logical system DEVCLNT190. ( DEVCLNT190 is target local system).
    Hopefully i described it clearly. and thank you for help!
    Best regards,
    NT

Maybe you are looking for