ECC 6 with BIW on same server?

Hi,
I am installing ECC 6 (ABAP) in one server, now there is a requirement for BW also, in ECC 6 version BW comes with the ERP 2005 CDs, and does SAP recommends to install in same server as well?.
(In ECC 5 I had a separate server for BW, and installed as another SID..can same is possible or along with ERP the BW also suggested)
thanks,
Mathew

Hi Mathew,
Currently, you can only implement SAP ECC/SAP NetWeaver BI on the same server on a project basis. (You'll see this mentioned in the upgrade/installation guides for SAP ECC.) This means that you will need to get approval from SAP to pursue this option. SAP will review your project to determine whether we think you are a good candidate for this approach and monitor your project. Please see SAP Note 855534 for more information on this landscape option.
You can also find more on this in some of the threads on the Integration with mySAP ERP 2004 forum at SAP NetWeaver Technical Integration with ERP
Regards,
Katie Beavers
SAP NetWeaver Product Management

Similar Messages

BI 7.0 and ECC 6.0 in the same server

Dear experts,
In my company the scenarion is like, we have installed ECC 6.0 in server where development work is going on.
Now we have requirement to implement the BI 7.0 in the same server as already BI content is existing in the same server.
My question is
Is it possible to implement the BI on the same server?
If yes, is it possible to extract the data from the development client on the same server where ECC 6.0 running?
If No, then what is the use of the BI contents in the ECC 6.0 server?
Regards,
SUD

Hi
> it possible to implement the BI on the same server?
Yes, why not? But that will be a separate SAP installation with different SID.
>If yes, is it possible to extract the data from the development client on the same server where ECC 6.0 running?
Yes, that is possible. Both the system will be having different Logical system name. You have to create a source system connection from ur BI to ECC system and then data extraction is possible.
>If No, then what is the use of the BI contents in the ECC 6.0 server?
BI Content in ECC is there to facilitate data extraction from ECC to BI. It would provide you the structure of data extraction. Presence of BI Cont does not mean a ECC system will be working as BI system.
Hope this clarifies your doubt.
Regards
Anindya Bose

Install ECC 6.0 and Solution Manager on same server Error (MaxDB/Linux)

I have installed Solution manager on one server and then ECC 6 also in the same server with another SID. during the installation it errored out at phase "SLD configuration" with UME error , J2EE_ADMIN locked etc..we checked the user id and noticed it got locked in ECC 6 system and we unlocked it.
But after the ECC installation the solution manager java engine is not coming up error with "com.sap.security.core.ume.service failed" error. Prior to the ECC installation the Solution Manager J2EE was working.
thanks in advance
Mathew

error in the /j2ee/cluster/server0/log/defaultTrace.1.trc
is as follows
#1.5#00137256A483001E0000001700006F190004163784D40864#1150327614343#com.sap.engine.core.Framework##com.sap.engine.core.Framework#######SAPEngine_System_Thread[impl:5]_61##0#0#Fatal#1#/System/Server#Plain###Critical shutdown was invoked. Reason is: Core service com.sap.security.core.ume.service failed. J2EE Engine cannot be started.#
When I looked at using jcmon the dispacher is up and the server0 and SDM is down

BI and ECC 6.0 installation in the same server

Hello SAP Experts,
I am given a task of installing BI 7.0 and ECC 6.0 in the same server. Can someone suggest me of what are all the Do's and Don'ts in this scenario and what is the hardware requirements.
Thanks & Regards
Vanitha

Hi,
For installing BI, you have to install Netweaver.
You already have ECC 6.0 in the System.
As a part of BI system, you will be extracting data from ECC Ssytem and loading in BW System.
Hence if your requireement is like data is loaed in the the BW System every one hour, it will slow down the ECC System.
In future you may need to do some OS patch update, database patch update which is not required in ECC, but it will effect both systems
I have not seen any scenario where OLTP and OLAP System are in the same box
But if you are just doing for learning purpose and you are doing it in your sand box , that should be fine

Install SAP Solution Manager with DEV instance in the same server (MCOD)

Hello, i would like to install SAP Solutions Manager together with DEV ECC 6.0 in the same host, DEV is currently installed and working fine.
I followed note 551915 to convert MS-SQL 2005 to MCOD (change of schema from dbo to dev) and worked fine. But when i am installing the SolMan through the sapinst i don´t see the option MCOD
The only option i am confussed is
MS SQL Server
Database reuse o - New Database (DBSID = SAPSID)
o - Use Existing Database
Database ID (DBSID)
Witch option should i choose to perform a MCOD installation? new db or use existing db (DEV)?
Kind Regards

Hi Merchan, if you want to use MCOD you need to select the option: o - Use Existing Database
Database ID (DBSID) .
Regards,
Darwin C.

How to install both solution manager and ECC Development on same server

Hi All,
Can anyone help me how to install Solution Manager and ECC Development on same server and also whether SLD is required? if yes, then how to setup.
Pls let me know.
Regards,
Karthik

Hi Karthik,
I try to answer you message, my answer may not be sufficient for you.
Install SAP Solution Manager and ECC development as separate systems sharing the same server. So each system will get it's own system id and installation number.
Verify sizing of both systems.
SLD is not mandatory for a SAP Solution Manager. If a SLD already exist in your System Landscape, you can connect SMSY (System Landscape) in transaction SMSY_SETUP with a SLD. Information on System will then be retrieved from SLD, rather via an RFC.
Best regards,
Ruediger Stoecker

Problem with multiple Toplink/JPA apps in same server

Anyone have experence of running serveral Toplink/ EJB-3 Web apps in the same server (OC4J, alas)?
We seem to get a problem with the second app failing to initialise toplink, with an entity not found message. Each app runs OK on it's own.

Yes, they access the same datasource and most of the tables overlap.
We're thinking it might help to have common entity classes and put them in a shared library, but I don't know if this is relevant (setting up shared libraries complicates testing and tends to snowball, I reckon we need about 15 jars all told).
I''ve had some funnies on OC4J before which I think may be to do with it's use of ClassLoaders, for example I initially put persistence.xml in the libary jar with the data model, but for some reason I get the entity not found error that way. It only seems to work if it's in the classes folder.
For the moment we're getting arround the problem with multiple OC4J instances in the server.

Problems with Sent mail and multiple accounts on the same server

I have 2 different email accounts that are on the same server. Regardless of the account from which I send the email, all of the sent messages end up in the same sent folder. Is there a way to force the sent messages to go into their correct Sent folder?

In the Finder, go to ~/Library/Mail/. With that folder open, do Edit > Select All (⌘A), then Edit > Copy (⌘C), and paste it in your reply to this post, to let me see the names of the files and folders present at the root level of the Mail folder.
Before actually posting that information, you may edit it so that the file/folder names do not reveal any details you wish to keep private, e.g. you may replace any real username with "username" to hide your real email address if you wish; similarly, you may disguise any domain names you don't want to be revealed. Try to be consistent in how you disguise those details, though, as we may need to refer to them in subsequent posts.
Now, go to ~/Library/Mail/Mailboxes/. With that folder open, repeat the process to let me see the names of the files and folders it contains. Again, you may disguise any mailbox names you wish to keep private. Be careful to not alter any suffixes, though.
Finally, for the two accounts involved in the problem, locate the account folders within ~/Library/Mail/ -- their name begins with the account type (POP, IMAP, Mac), followed by the account username and the incoming mail server. For each account folder, repeat the process to let me see the names of the files and folders it contains.
Note: For those not familiarized with the ~/ notation, it refers to the user's home folder. You can easily locate any of the folders referred to in this post by copying the file path here, doing Go > Go to Folder in the Finder, and pasting the file path there.

Is it possible to have 2 instances with the same name but different edition in the same server?

Hi everybody!
I have in a little trouble ....
*** Scenario.
Oracle Enterprise Edition 11gr2 over Oracle Solaris 11
3 instances: PROD, QA, DEV
1 ASM instance
Listener ports: 1520, 1530 & 1540
           Those are production system
*** The problem:
Customer can't pay Oracle EE, they want to change to Oracle Std One
Limitations:
I cant have a similar system to test.
*** My idea:
Install Oracle Std One, in the same path:
/u01/app/oracle/product/11.2.0/db          <-- EE
/u01/app/oracle/product/11.2.0/db_one   <-- Std Ed One
ASM:
/u01/app/11.2.0/grid          <-- EE                    +ASM
/u01/app/11.2.0/grid_one   <-- Std Ed One        +ASM1
Create databases:
Asign similar disks to +ASM1
Create DGs on +ASM1
Create databases: PROD, QA, DEV for Std Ed one
- is it posible that they have same instance name?
- if not, i suppose create as: PROD1, QA1, DEV1
Configure Listener port : 1521, 1531 & 1541
Migration technique:
Create Tablespaces, schemas
Lock users in EE
down listener: 1520, 1530 & 1540
Import data of final users in a window maintanance
configure and up listener: 1521, 1531 & 1541
Customer should test access and apps in new
Please tell me if my Idea is reallistic, all comments are going to be very apreciated.

sol.beach
I suppose end customer use a port per database in order to separate in a logical way the access to the databases,
i mean PROD, QA & DEV has the same users.
Hemant K Chitale
1. I've seen physical servers with 3 ASM instances: +ASM1, +ASM2, +ASM3
   on Solaris & Oracle 10g, I suppose is posible on 11g
2. The sever has occupied 2 sockets (2 physical CPU), so I can use Oracle Standard Ed One.
JohnWatson2
Thanks for your comments.
WadhahDaouehi
1. - You cannot run two ASM instance simultaneously on one Server, but you can run many Oracle database simultaneously
      on the same server which they use the ASM as storage type.
As a mentioned to Hemant K Chitale, I've seen a system with several instances running
About
     "you can run many Oracle database simultaneously on the same server which they use the ASM as storage type."
I'm not sure if i can use the same ASM which is part of a current Enterprise Ed over the new installation with Oracle Std Ed One.
2. - Why you want the same instance name?
If it is about the service name, which has by default the same instance name, just you can create a different instance name
and create the service name with the name that you wish.
SQL> alter system set service_names='instance_name';
Is a similar name, not the same
PROD, QA & DEV
PROD1, QA1 & DEV1
I consider add "1" at the end to refer "Oracle Standar Ed One"
But I agree with you, i can customize throught service_name.
Regards,
Abraham Mtz.

Replace a 2003 (not R2) File Server with a 2012R2 files server and preferably keep the same machine name and IP when finished

I am wanting to replace a 2003 (not R2) File Server with a 2012R2 file server and preferably keep the same machine name and IP when finished. For the moment I just need some "high level" guidance, little details can be worked out once I know
which direction I will go. I was considering that DFS might be a way to help get through the process although when finished the 2012R2 Files server will be by itself with no other file server planned at this time. DFS can stay installed for maybe
future purposes but clearly I wouldn't need the DFS Replication with only one machine.
Here's a few details of the environment....
1. DC's are 2012R2 but it is still 2003 DFL because the old 2003 DCs are still present. But likely they will be gone and the DFL elevated before I start on the File Server project
2. Nearly all machines in the facility have a shortcut on the "All Users" Desktop that points to the existing old File Server. Editing or replacing that shortcut would be a major pain,...hence why I want to keep the same machine name at least,
and maybe the same IP if not too much trouble. This way the existing shortcut would continue to work with the new 2012R2 File Server. The UNC path represented in that shortcut is also configured into one or more of our major business applications,
futher emphasizing the need to keep the UNC path the same throughout the process.
3. The facility runs 24/7/365 but is "light" on weekends. The political environment is such that there is little to no tolerance for any down time at all.
4. Would DFS (based from the 2012R2 machine) be a good tool to get where I need to go?
Thanks for any suggestions.
Phillip Windell

Hi Sharon,
I've done some more reading and have a few new ideas to run past you....
Yes regular DFS wouldn't help and the Namespace would still be different than how it was with just the old server. However I was thinking DFS Replication could replace the purpose of RoboCopy and it would keep the two locations "in sync" until I was ready
to flip over to the new server. DFS Rep can exist independently of a DFS Namespace, so a Namespace is not even needed. It needs a minimum of 2003R2 for the "later & better" DFS Rep but I believe 2003 can do an "in place" upgrade to 2003R2, so I would upgrade
the old server to 2003R2 first. As long as the DFS Rep on 2012R2 and 2003R2 will properly interact I think that will work.
Thanks for the reg info on the Shares. I'm debating if editing that would reg file would really be much better than manually creating the Shares on the new server while the DFS Replication was doing its job. I'll probably export that Key as a
safety move whether I use it or not.
Once the DFS Rep is fully in sync and the Shares are in place on the new server, I figure I would then:
1. Remove the DFS Replication Object (optionally remove DFS Services completely)
2. Rename the old File Server to something else and set it to DHCP
3. Rename the new File Server to the name I want to use and give it the IP the old server had.
How does that sound?
Phillip Windell

Use of ECC 6.0 with PI 7.0 server?

use of ECC 6.0 with PI 7.0 server?
what are the requirements for uploading wsdl and Tpz files from service Market Place to PI 7.0 server?

Hi
RZ70 automatically creates and uses an RFC to the SLD - assuming this RFC can communicate over your network
setup it should work
BTW You can always add a system manually to SLD or from other SLDs content as well - just in case this doesn't work
Best regards
Stuart

Restore database in the same server but with other sid (name)

i try to restore the database in the same server but with other sid (name) . The backup is on tape and
I want to know the steps I should follow.
thank.

To perform restore of database in same host to choose another DB name you can go for
1) duplicate using RMAN.
Directory structure should be different so take care of db_file_name_convert & log_file_name_convert parameters
Also check the Tns services exactly is it pointing to target & auxiliary
http://www.shutdownabort.com/quickguides/clone_rman.php
http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/9i/DuplicateDatabaseUsingRMAN9i.php

Oracle on same server with other DB

I'm trying to find a technical reason why it isn't good to have Oracle installed on the same server with SQL Server or some other DB Product. I've seen lots of people say, "Don't do it.", but I haven't seen a technical reason. If someone could point me to an FAQ or another source, I'd appreciate that as well.
TIA
VaAccess

AFAIK, adpatch is not aware of how much memory a server has. The number of workers it recommends depends on a set formula - pl see
How Does Adpatch Determine The Number Of Workers To Recommend? [ID 800024.1]
You are essentially wanting to a trade-off between performance and speed. You could specify 2 workers, but the upgrade will take an unacceptably long time. Allocating a large number of workers will affect performance on the other databases, as you have experienced. You will need to find a sweet spot somewhere in between that is acceptable to you. If you have additional hardware resources, one option is to move the non-EBS databases off this server. I do not think there is a magic bullet to solve your issues.
HTH
Srini

PI working with two MDM Repositories on same server

Dear PI experts,
I have this requirement to accomplish, maybe someone can guide me through. My experience with PI / XI is almost zero.
We had one MDM repository working per server, and PI configured to deliever the xml file each time articles are created in SRM.
Process : User creates articles in SRM, PI delievers xml in MDM folder, user enriches articles in MDM.
Now we have created a second MDM repository (but in the same server). The idea is making possible for PI to decide to each catalog / repository it should send the xml file, based on a field it would recieve from SRM (field "comany").
How and where could i make this enhancement in PI?
Do i have to create a new business system for the new catalog? or just a new communication chanel (with new paths to deliever xml file)?
Later on i guess i have to create a condition based on the value of the field (delievered by srm) in "Reciever determination".
As i told you, PI is not my area of expertise. Any ideas are very welcome.
Thank you,
Best Regards,
Joao Silva Carvalho

João N Carvalho wrote:
> How and where could i make this enhancement in PI?
> Do i have to create a new business system for the new catalog? or just a new communication chanel (with new paths to deliever xml file)?
>
> Later on i guess i have to create a condition based on the value of the field (delievered by srm) in "Reciever determination".
a new communication channel and the conditional routing (in the interface determination since receiver is going to be the same) should help you
/people/suraj.sr/blog/2006/01/05/multiple-inbound-interfaces-within-a-service

Deploying a copy of existing database with a different name on the same server

I am a developer(an inexperienced one) trying to understand what is the best way to deploy a brand new database with
the exact same schema as an existing DB on the same server, but with a different name. I want to preserve the data in all reference tables which I can do by having the relevant post-deployment scripts run after the deployment.
What I can't understand is how the project should be set up to deploy database Customer_2 if database Customer_1 exists on
this server - the Visual Studio project contains DB Customer and I need to find a way to be able to deploy Customer_N (but without creating N identical DB's in the project). I checked a ton of articles and blogs, and feel dumb asking this question but haven't
been able to understand it yet. Any help would be appreciated.

Hello,
Maybe the TargetDatabase and the DeployToDatabase properties can help you.
http://www.asp.net/web-forms/tutorials/deployment/web-deployment-in-the-enterprise/deploying-database-projects
You can deploy multiples databases from one project if you want, as explained on the following
post:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1544966/gdr-deploying-multiple-database-targets-with-one-project
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Alberto Morillo
SQLCoffee.com

ECC 6 with BIW on same server?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for