EIM 4.3 - Closing Cases

Hello,
Had an interesting scenaio (yet very likely) in testing today using integrated EIM.
Email came in to agent
    - Auto Reply sent to customer
    - Customer replied - thanks for auto reply, and added additional information - setting off exception queue routing
    - Customer replied one more time.... "thanks sorry for all the hassle......"
Agent could not complete first case as there was a pending email
Agent could search on open case activities and saw emails in queue - exception queue and integrated queue
Agent can not pick emails
Agent had to ask integrated adminstrator/supervisor to find exception queue email and then forward that to the queue or complete the email for the agent(as the supervisor cannot send directly to an agent)
Agent then had to complete another 2 emails in queue - task limit is set to 1
Agent could then work on exception queue email
Agent could then work on final reply email.
... that was a perfect scenario where with custom code, the last agent who worked the case received the next email.
If this went to another agent in queue and you did not have a queue configured per agent, it would be a real mess to get that closed off!
Has anyone else ran into this? This isn't an issue with non-integrated.
Thanks!
Barry

Hello,
Unfortunately I can't think of how you would do this in integrated... using non-integrated, you could just have your agent create their own task assign it to the current case, and then change the due date so that the task would then show up as red when it hit that date. In non-integrated, maximum activities and tasks are two different settings.
Using Integrated, I think you are stuck leaving the activity open, which of course would blow your SLA, and stop you from having new activities assigned to you.
I think you would have to setup some kind of reminder using other software to follow up with the agent. At that point, the agent may be able to do a search on the case, and re-open it and then send and email, but I have never tried this (it may not work).
By default, agents do not have permissions to 'send messages', so if you wanted an agent to be able to send externally from EIM, you need to add this permission, as well, you would somehow need to mask their outbound email address and set it to one of your company defaults so that customer's do not start conversing directly with the agent outside of your routing rules.
Thanks!
Barry

Similar Messages

  • FSCM DM -Auto Closing cases - where work is still required and duplications

    Hi,
    We have linked SAP4.6c to ECC6 to implement FSCM Dispute management.
    We have a scenario when we have created a Dispute case linked to an open item in 4.6c ( IDOC accross to ECC6 creates a dispute case),  the BIZ can be working on the Dispute case.. when the customer pays the invoice in full and does not make a deduction against the document, so no parital or residual item created.  Idoc automatically creates and sends the information accross in to ECC6 Class changes to SOLV_INV.
    This of course will close the dispute case in ECC6 - _however there may still be a need for the Dispute Case to be worked upon and a credit raised, but of course the status will be closed - and in our instance the BIZ does not work on CLOSED cases.
    Does anyone know of a method we can implement where by we can control the status of the dispute case / or show on an attribute on the case that the previous status was still outstanding resolution? Is there a Standard method in ECC6 that I have missed ??
    We have another issue whereby we have a ( bespoke method admittedly) where by we create a dispute case in R/3, that has no Links in 4.6c to any FI postings ( This sends the idoc in to ECC6 to create a NON FI Linked dispute Case).  We are now looking for a method on ECC6 to run and check for any duplicates in ECC6 on the customer/ xreffing external ref value - and linking the 2 cases  ( preventing duplication of effort working on 2 seperate cases?)
    Thank you for any advice you might be able to offer, and appricate that the 2nd issue is bespoke - but wonder if anyone else has had an issue with duplications - and how they handle them.
    Regards
    Angela

    Can you please elaborate on your first scenario, and the rationale behind working on a Dispute case when there is no deduction made? I mean there is no disputed amount left, then why would one want a Dispute case to be open and not closed.
    If you have a valide business scenario, then this can be done if you have Enph2 implemented or higher with help of Customer Disputed obj.
    For the second Q, again with Enph2, you have fuctionality to create proposals to find duplicates if any. There is also a BADI around this fucntionality to help with finding duplicates.

  • [closed-case] Any way to use an older GCC toolchain with makepkg?

    I'm having issues with a package in AUR: Code::Blocks SVN.
    I'm writing this question in Newbie Corner because it is a general question with that particular PKGBUILD being a case of it.
    Anyway, I'm running into compilation issues.  I believe if I could use an older version of g++, say 4.6.3 instead of 4.7.0, that the compilation would succeed.  My question: is it possible to have side-by-side GCC installs and how would I specify, perhaps in /etc/makepkg.conf, which to use for a PKGBUILD?
    Edit:
    Here is a thread on Code::Blocks own forums which highlights that GCC 4.7.0 has compilation issues with C::B.
    Last edited by headkase (2012-04-16 07:13:39)

    Mr.Elendig wrote:Install gcc46 or whatever you want from aur, export CC=path/to/gcc4.6binary. Same with CXX
    The most recent non-cross-compiling GCC in AUR is GCC45.  It's an orphan and the latest comment in it says the build is broken.
    Thank you though, I've decided to wait for a patch - that is the most reasonable thing all around.  However, there is a "gcc 4.7.0 broken" thread on Code::Blocks forums so I believe I'll post there as well - eventually, hopefully, the C::B SVN will Just Work™ on Arch
    I'll mark this thread as closed-case, not because it is solved but because it has been fully considered.
    Edit: originally edited title to "closed" but then realized that has forum-meaning so re-edited to "closed-case"
    Last edited by headkase (2012-04-16 07:14:45)

  • For iPhone Case Lovers and their concern of Magnet Closers!!

    I recently learned that some have had issues with their iPhone when used with a cases that includes magnets for closing. Sorry mwhitted for your woes.
    While looking for a nice case for myself I became concerned of this, and decide to contact Sena about their Dockable iPhone case. This case seemed to be exactly what I was looking for, but after reading mWhitted and a few others problems I wasn't sure.
    So I sent them a e-mail with the links and question their knowledge about their product.
    This was late last night (about 1:39 am). How about 10:09 in the a.m. I get a response! A Long and thoroughly explained response (read Below).
    Great customer service! I am going to give this company a try and see how well this works.
    I have included my original e-mail to them and their response by Ronda so that you may judge for yourself.
    PS. mWhitted, aparently the case you used may not have had the proper magnets and maybe not assembled appropriately for this phone which may have caused the problem. What do you think, maybe this may have been the cause?
    Thanks for the info by the way.
    Below is my email to them.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Stephan Singh
    Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 01:39 am PDT (GMT-07:00)
    Subject: Pre-Order Dockable iPhone case
    I have looked up many cases for my iPhone and I have found your Dockable one to be just the style and function I am looking for. Although recently there has been a buzz going around that the magnetic closing cases such as these have caused many iPhones to malfunction.
    I was curious as to if you had any information on this? I also wanted to send you this so that you may look into this to avoid any potential problems with your sales.
    Another question, I would like to know if it would be possible to replace the magnets in this case and apply velcro to it instead as an option for your customers?
    As far as the info that I had on the magnets, you can read tease threads from apple support forums for reference.
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1018081
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1036960&tstart=0
    Please contact me asap on this issue, for I would like to know my options on a purchase through you.
    Thank you
    Stephan
    NOW HERE IS THEIR MESSAGE BACK.
    ----- Original Message ----
    From: Sena Cases <[email protected]>
    To: [email protected]
    Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 10:09:26 AM
    Subject: Case Update: 1086 - Pre-Order Dockable iPhone case
    Update for Case #1086 - "Pre-Order Dockable iPhone case"
    We use only non Neodymium magnets that do not interfere with the device. We have done extensive testing with many devices to assure that the magnet use will not harm the internal applications or antenna on the devices which we manufacture cases for. Also we have long created cases for use with the IPOD nano, Ipod 3rd,4th and Ipod Video devices using the non Neodymium magnets in our cases without any interferance at all after selling thousands upon thousands of cases. Sena Cases are designed by Engineers with PhD, they are all handcrafted by skilled craftsmen who have been in the leather industry for many years making them expert leather craftsmen, our cases are not just designed by a purse maker or a designer who is thinking of only fashion and style, because of the engineering focus of the design staff they are detail oriented making sure that each and every feature and function of the device has been addressed and is accessible as well as taking wevery precaution to protect the devices and information which belongs to our loyal customers, and new customers as we hope that each person who finds their way to Sena Cases will become loyal to our products for all devices which they own now and in the future. Because our company's entire focus is PDA, Smartphone and Computer cases Sena Management and Design staff have extensively researched magnets available in the industry and magnetic substrates, with a solid plan to avoid any magnet which would harm any device we have created a case for, So the selection of the magnets available and the possible strengths that we can use are focused on a very limited type and size of magnet, sometimes even shape takes some precidence in the design of certain cases, in regards to the iPhone magnets the staff have created a new installation making the magnet undetectable on the open face of the case so that the form and shape are very sleek and suitable to the high style devbice which is in the Sena Case. Some case makers off shore may just throw a case together without considering future ramifications, These case manufacturers may be selling cases at a lower price point not created out of fine materials or more novelty type accessory cases that are often offered at a bargain price that is unbelievably inexpensive, They may be thinking when creating their own design that " this company and that company use magnets we will to..." this may be how cases get created for devices which may harm the device that they were intended to protect. Sena Cases has taken every precaution to design a slim sleek sexy iphone case that will protect your device in a very stylish fashion throughout the years that you own this expensive device.
    I will pass your forum links on to our design staff and the research group as well as our company president for review, Customer feedback is highly valued here at Sena Cases. I assure you that serious research has been done to assure that your iPHONE case will fit precisely allow access to all features and functions and to protect your investment in the device and the information which it contains as you as well as your referrals and your future business is our main focus and if we dint sweat all the little details to attempt to create you a perfect case for your device we could not expect your loyalty to our brand.
    We do also stand behind all our products with a one year warranty against any manufacturing defects. The best compliment we can receive is for a customer to refer family, friends, colleagues and strangers that they cross paths with to our cases as your refferral of our product is more valuable to us that a full page color ad in a major magazine, if your happy you will refer many people to our products who will refer their friends and so on and so on....
    Stephan, I reccomend that you avoid Neodymium magnets in what ever case you elect to purchase and you will be fine, I am hopefull that you will elect to protect your iPhone in our cases, as we make a fine product as does many competitors in the market, I am not familiar with their designs for this device so I cannot speak openly about any of them, but the iPHONE cases in our office on display as well as future designer cases to be released before the fall are all incredible. Sena Will have some leathers and designs nwever seen before by similar type device owners ever in the past, as our company has searched out new Leather vendors as well as creating our traditional line of stylish Sena cases will be releasing a designer series of cases for iPHONE because the device is phenomonal the design staff and management felt that the cases could also help carry off the devices style in a ddifferent intrepretation.
    You will love any of the Sena Cases designs which are available now or in the future., We have had customers stop by and try on the prototype cases which we have photographed and were in love with the look and fit. The sensor on the face of the case has been revised the original case designed before the device was available to accommodate the proximity/light sensors! The sensor lies above the ear piece at the top of the screen. so there will be two circular oval type openings above the screen. These cases are really off the hook, crazy cool and distinctively beautiful, I am hopeful you will enjoy owning one to protect your device.
    Regards,
    Rhonda
    PC   Windows XP  

    OK. Here it is...
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neodymium_magnet
    "Neodymium magnets are very strong in comparison to their mass..."
    A.K.A. "rare-earth magnetS".
    "While most solid state electronic devices are not effected by magnetic fields, some medical devices are not manufactured to mitigate the effects of strong magnetic fields." Maybe phones too?
    These could be the ones that I removed from my case:
    http://www.kjmagnetics.com/proddetail.asp?prod=D603
    From the above sales site:
    "Never place neodymium magnets near electronic appliances."

  • MacBooks and closed lid mode

    Has Apple changed the OS yet for the MacBook so one can keep it operating when the lid is closed?
    For a machine that costs three times as much as your typical MS Windows laptop, this seems to be an expensive annoyance.
    I've read older posts of same topic where people don't understand why one would want to do this.
    There's times when I want to keep a program running, such as downloading Apple's frequent updates and walk away for awhile, but I don't want everyone else knowing my business.
    Another related feature is locking the computer (disabling input/output), while it keeps running whatever applications have started.  If MacBooks do so, I haven't found it yet.  Everytime I put it to sleep or logout, it shutdowns all running applications, and I have to start all over when I log back in or wake it up. 
    Doesn't seem like Macs were intended for productivity.

    Mac notebooks are designed to go to sleep when they are closed. This is a safety precaution to prevent users from putting a running MBP into a closed case or backpack where it will overheat and cook itself (and possibly cause a fire) in the absence of air movement.
    You can defeat this precaution by installing third-party software such as InsomiaX that prevents the machine from sleeping, if you are confident you'll never make the above-described mistake.
    When no one is logged into your computer, no one is allowed to use it, and no programs can run. If you want to run something on it, log in. That's what logging in is for.
    When it's asleep, it is not operating. Sleep is an energy-saving mode. You can't save energy while the machine is running, so the machine can't sleep and run at the same time.

  • Pivot table Opened & Closed

    Hello
    Within OBIEE Answers I am trying to put together a pivot table showing the number of incidence opened and closed for the month by group name. However I am having a problems showing this in one pivot table. The reason for this is because the opened and closed dates are separate columns. Is there a way I can show in one pivot table how many Service Requests are Opened and how many are Closed by Group Name
    Group Name : List the different Group Names in one column
    incidence: incidence #'s of the incidence which were raised for individual Group Name
    Open Date: Date when the case was raised
    Closed Date: Date when a particular case is closed
    Query : we need to show the open and closed cases for a particular group name on the basis of month...
    Row of the pivot should be group name... In the column we need to have the day and under it we need to have the count of open incidence and count of closed incidence...
    Could you please help me out in this?
    Thank you
    John

    I'd be interested to hear other people's opinions on this as I have to do something similar very soon but with more tracking points.
    I think you can only solve this in the repository.
    Say you have your fact table like this:
    some_id
    open_date
    open_request_count (1)
    closed_date
    close_request_count (1 if closed else 0)
    And a single time dimension.
    I'd keep one time dimension (not open date or close date) and model it using aliases of the fact table.
    So your first set of measures are measures by open date. For these you have an alias of the fact table joined to time on open date.
    Your second set of measures are measures by close date. For these you have an alias of the fact table joined to time on close date.
    Then you can run a report with time, open count (by open date) and close count (by close date).
    What you lose here is the ability to see your service request, the date it was opened AND the date it was closed. You might solve this with measures around the days between the dates (ie closed in 5 days, closed in 3 days).

  • How to reopen a case?? #0213681843

    how to reopen a closed case??
    it's super hard to find what i can do or want to know within this adobe website or communities...

    What I heard it it it is an issue with FS 8.8.
    They fixed it in 9.0 so that you can re-open any purchase order.

  • Failed Hardware Scan and other issues E440

    Hi all,
    This is probably more rant than anything, but I wanted to give a heads up to others too.
    I have a ThinkPad E440 that is a year old. From the very first time I turned it on, there have been issues. The first hardware scan (via Lenovo Solution Center - LSC) showed a warning for the Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260 Local Connection Test. There were also tons of System Events that always show up in the "Configuration History" part of the LSC. You can look at the calendar and tell exactly which days I used the computer because there will be System Events generated each day. Things like app crashes and failed drivers.
    In July 2014, I got the first warning for the 16 GB SSD - the SMART Short Self-Test. By February this year it showed as failed for each hardware scan (these were initially set up to run monthly).
    Also the whole time I've had it the touch screen would just stop working at some point and I would have to reboot to get it working again.
    I finally called Lenovo on March 30th, before my warranty expired. When I called that time, I didn't realize the hard drive failure was the SSD. So they sent me a new 500 GB drive. I also added the other things into the case when I talked to them. For the wireless issue they suggested making sure the driver was up to date. I did this and let them know when I called back that it was up to date and still having the warning. So I called them to tell them to tell them about the wireless and also that I realized it was the SSD having the failure, not the main drive. The first case had already been closed even though none of the other items were addressed.
    So they opened another case (this is #2). They said to mail them the laptop since the wireless issue would probably be on the board and it wasn't something I could fix myself. They sent a box with a prepaid overnight shipping label. I was very sick for a few days so I sent it back to them on April 10th (a Friday). Via UPS I saw it was delivered on Saturday. Work was performed on it Monday, April 13th and sent back to me that very day. I received it on April 14th. This part of the service has been excellent - very fast response.
    Being in IT, I included a letter with the laptop that outlined the issues that should have been in the case. I also printed the hardware scans and what the system events looked like.
    When I got the laptop back, the sheet inside said they had replaced the Speaker because of Distorted Sound. This was not even on the list even though I had noticed it. I didn't even power up the laptop before calling them again - yes, I was furious! Plus our power was out...
    So this was noon on the 14th. They opened case #3 and sent me ANOTHER BOX so I could send it back.
    After our power came back on the 15th, I powered up my laptop. I opened the browser (I have it set to restore the previous session) and there was a sexually explicit video on YouTube. I opened the other browser and there was a different video on YouTube. So this person was watching YouTube instead of fixing my laptop. I looked through both browser histories and there was quite a bit of activity while my laptop was at the repair center... I ran the hardware scan - still failed and a warning for the wireless. They really hadn't done anything.
    I also found two pictures of the repair person in the recycle bin...
    So I called back. I was LIVID! They opened another case (this is #4). And sent me ANOTHER BOX. I finally learned the other day that once a case is opened, it cannot be edited or added to at all. Instead, they close the other case and open a new one. I guess their turnaround time for closing cases is excellent! I've never seen a system like that - and I've used a lot of them.
    I got a really nice, patient fellow on the line. He took all my info (again). I emailed him the pictures, screen captures of the YouTube videos, the letter I had sent - everything. He entered as much into the new case as he could - he talked to one of the supervisors to make sure he did it right. Somehow he flagged it so that the laptop would get more attention (time) at the repair facility. He also opened a separate case (an escalation ticket?) for a supervisor to call me regarding the person's conduct at the repair facility. He said they would call me that day. (It's now the 25th and I've never heard from anyone)
    So, he sent me ANOTHER BOX. I've built up quite a stack of them.
    Our power was out AGAIN from the 17th through the 19th (don't get me started).
    I noticed a hardware scan had now gotten a failure on the main hard drive. So I called them on the 21st to add this to the case before sending the laptop back. The girl said they can't add anything to an existing case or edit it at all once it's opened. She would have to open a new case and SEND ME ANOTHER BOX. I told her to forget it because I was ready to send it in and didn't want to wait for another box. I also asked for a status on that "escalation case" where the supervisor was supposed to call me. In order to do this she, yes, wait for it, had to open ANOTHER CASE!! So they would know I wanted a status. I'm completely dumbfounded.
    So I sent it back on the 21st. This time I practically wiped it. I had already removed all my files the last time, but I had left my bookmarks and browser history intact.  I set up a guest logon with admin privileges. I updated my letter and printed off more stuff to include with the box. On one sheet I had only the case number, the serial number and machine type. On another sheet I had "DO NOT SEPARATE THIS PAPERWORK FROM THE LAPTOP" and the case number. I put this sheet on top (The guy on the 15th said my letter and stuff may have gotten separated from the laptop once it was delivered to the repair facility). I used a ton of staples so it would all stay together. I included in my letter the failure on the main hard drive and asked if they could look at it. I wrote about having to open a new case if I wanted to include it.
    They received it on the 22nd. A nice gentleman from the repair facility called me that day asking about the password. that. was. written. on the sheet they have you fill out. I told him what happened last time and also mentioned the hard drive failure and asked if he could look into it. He said they would.
    I received my laptop back yesterday morning.The sheet that came with it said they had "replaced the following parts to complete the repair of your laptop."
    Part Description                                           Symptom
    IMAGE                                                             Replaced due to engineering change
    System board                                                 Network card error
    Hard disk drive                                                Network card error
    ECA-WIRELESS                                            <no symptom listed>
    There was also a sheet saying they had installed a factory preload of software and I needed to install Lenovo and Windows updates.
    When I booted it up, the first thing I noticed, in the lower right corner was:
    Windows 8.1
    SecureBoot isn’t configured correctly
    Build 9600
    I ran a hardware scan. Well, I tried. It stopped part way through and said it finished successfully but most of the tasks showed up as cancelled. I tried to run it again - issues - rebooting ensued. It said the LSC wasn’t available and that I should try again or reboot.
    Tried several times. Then got what I guess is the new BSOD - kinder, gentler:
    Your PC ran into a problem and needs to restart. We're just
    collecting some error info, and then we'll restart for you. (xx% complete)
    If you'd like to know more, you can search online later for this error: DRIVER_CORRUPTED_EXPOOL
    Even though the LSC said my Lenovo files were all up to date, I ran the Update. And first I had to download a new version of Update. Then I downloaded all of the Lenovo updates and installed them (there were quite a few). The BIOS update failed. While I was doing the Lenovo downloads, I got a light blue screen but no text (I was out of the room so I'm not sure what happened). Did CTRL-ALT-DEL and it shows only IE and Task Manager as applications that are running. Could not “Switch to” IE. Hitting window key to go to start didn't do anything. So I had to restart.
    By 3pm yesterday there were 34 system events in the configuration history.
    I ran the hardware scan again after I updated the Lenovo files, and you guessed it! Failure on the SSD (SMART Short Self-Test) and warning on the wireless. Nothing had changed. Except hardware scan is acting different than it did before I sent in the laptop for repairs. When it finishes, it instantly closes and just shows 100% complete. When I click on "see last results" it shows a screen called
    Log Information,
    Canceled 04/24/2015 n:nn pm 
    You have not done a hardware test on your computer
    And the calendar in LSC only shows the very first hardware scan I did on Friday. Even the hardware scan screen shows the date and time of the last scan. It also shows the error code. In order to see exactly what is failing, I have to sit there and watch it very closely and snap a picture of the screen as soon as the error (or warning) shows up.
    When I would try to run Windows update, it would hang up PC Settings. I couldn't even kill it using task manager because it didn't show up as a task. During this, I got a flag saying the firewall wasn't turned on. I tried to turn it on, but clicking on Turn on Windows Firewall didn't do anything. I tried to setup my Microsoft account but that just hung too.
    I ended up running Windows Update FOUR TIMES to get all the updates installed. Every time I ran it, it said "Done!" and I would run it again and more would show up. The last time was this morning.
    At some point, the error about SecureBoot went away.
    Then, I created a bootable BIOS update disk. Following the ReadMe instructions, I went through ThinkPad Setup and verified several values. Of note:
    Secure Boot was DISABLED. According to the ReadMe file, this should be ENABLED in Windows 8.1. I enabled it.
    Under Startup/Boot, according to the ReadMe that came with the BIOS update, UEFI/Legacy Boot is supposed to be set at UEFI Only for Windows 8.1. Mine was set to "Both". I changed it.
    In Startup, OS Optimized Defaults was DISABLED, even though it says right there (and in the BIOS update ReadMe) it should be ENABLED to meet Microsoft Windows 8 Certification Requirement.
    After these updates, I flashed the new BIOS.
    Then, I ran hardware scan again...
    Now I have TWO failures on the SSD: Random Seek Test and SMART Short Self-Test. Great.
    In the Event Viewer (that I recently discovered), it says my disk has a bad block. It just says The device, \Device\Harddisk\DR1, has a bad block. I assume this is the SSD...
    There are 867 events in the event viewer - Critical, Error, and Warning...
    Fifty-two of these are from October 7, 2013 - before my little laptop was a glimmer.
    The rest are from when Lenovo had it and yesterday and today.
    64 of them are the disk error.
    341 are from DeviceSetupManager. 65 of those are from failed driver installs. 69 are for not being able to establish a connection to the windows update service. 64 are from not being able to establish a connection to the Windows Metadata and Internet Services (WMIS).
    3 times it's rebooted without cleanly shutting down
    60 of them are from Service Control Manager and say The TDKLIB service failed to start due to the following error: The system cannot find the file specified.
    One of them says {Registry Hive Recovered} Registry hive (file): '\??\C:\Users\Default\NTUSER.DAT' was corrupted and it has been recovered. Some data might have been lost.
    16 are warnings that various processors in Group 0 are being limited by system firmware.
    12 say the certificate for local system with thumbprint <bunch of hex numbers> is about to expire or already expired.
    108 are warnings for failure to load the driver \Driver\WUDFRd for various devices
    16 are application errors
    One is for the computer rebooting from a "bug check"
    15 are for name resolutions timing out after none of the configured DNS servers responded.
    10 are for SecureBoot being disabled.
    14 for services terminating unexpectedly
    15 are for WLAN Extensibility Module has stopped
    61 are for applications not being able to be restarted because the application SID does not match Conductor SID
    12 are for activation of CLSID timing out waiting for the service wuauserv to stop
    So, I'll call them on Monday and open. a. new. case (#5?) - but really 7. And get A NEW BOX.
    I'll keep you updated!

    Hi amycdero and welcome to the HP Forum,
    I understand that you are having scanning and printing issues after upgrading to Mavericks OS X v10.9.1. I will try my best to help you resolve this issue.
    In this document for Mac OS X: Scanning Software Does Not Open or Stops Responding are steps the may help you with your scanning issue.
    This document for Fixing Ink Streaks, Faded Prints, and Other Common Print Quality Problems should help with the streaking printing issue.
    I hope this information is helpful. Please let me know.
    Thank you,
    I worked on behalf of HP.

  • Internal Hard Drives Disappeared, Finder Memory Problem

    Hello Helpful Folks,
    I recently installed an addional internal Hard Drive, and an additional 1GB SDRAM. This worked great for a day, but the next morning, after powering up, system was extremely sluggish, and after much deadline-induced impatient problem solving, has gone from bad to worse (system refuses to acknowledge existence of internal Hard Drives). I apologize in advance for the length of this post, but as
    the devil is in the details, I figure too much info is better than not enough.
    Following is a breakdown of my system: AS IT LAST WORKED; RECENT UPGRADES; and MY LAME ATTEMPTS AT PROBLEM SOLVING THAT HAVE MADE THINGS WORSE. Please don't interpret my all caps as shouting, just trying to organize this post for better clarity.
    System is dedicated to Video Editing with FCP 3, running under OS 9.2.2. System is "off the Grid", i.e. no network, no internet, no printer, no gaming devices. System was purchased new in July 2001, by a friend. At one point I know this system had an Airport card, which was removed prior to my purchase in 2003. I can't remember what else it may have had installed in its history, but here's what it has now:
    SYSTEM AS IT LAST WORKED:
    **bold items are upgrades Original Owner or I installed with no apparent problems**
    Power Mac G4 "Quicksilver" 2001
    867 PowerPC G4, 256 L2, 2MB L3
    -1 Stick "ValueRAM - KVR 133 x 64 C3/512" in PC 133 DIMM slot **
    - "Virtual Memory" was turned off years ago due to conflict with FCP 3
    -2 empty DIMM slots
    -1 60 GB internal HD (Maxtor Ultra ATA/100), 1 partition, formatted HFS+, jumpered as "Master" on Internal ATA 2 ID=0 (which as I understand it is ATA/66 speed)
    -1 Pioneer "Superdrive" DVD-R/W/CD-R/W on Internal ATA 0 ID=0
    -NVIDIA GeForce2 MX with 32MB SDRAM in AGP Slot, feeding a 17" Apple Studio Display.
    -PCI Display Card "formacGA7" - not attached to any external device, not sure what its intended purpose is.**
    -3 Empty PCI Slots
    -OEM Keyboard attached to Monitor's rear USB port.
    -Microsoft 3 Button Wheel mouse with "IntelliEye" (wheel is 3rd Button) connected to Keyboard USB port (right side).**
    -2 OEM FireWire (400) ports
    -2 OEM USB (1) ports
    Peripherals that have worked in various configurations with this system over the past 3 years:
    -3 OWC Mercury Elite ("Oxford Chipset") Externally powered, External FireWire(400) 200GB Hard Drives, 1 partition each, formatted HFS+, daisy-chained to either of the FireWire ports.
    -1 Canon GL1 MiniDV camera, attached either to the other FireWire port, or to the last drive in the chain, depending on my urgency/laziness factor. BTW, FCP 3 has worked flawlessly controlling this Cam for logging and Batch Capturing.
    Applications on System Hard Drive that I have OEM CDs for:
    -OS 9.2 - (I think I remember that OS X was removed from system due to conflicts shortly after original purchase)
    -FCP 3
    -DiskWarrior (version unknown, purchased from Alsoft in 2003)
    -OWC Intech Hard Disk SpeedTools ver 3.5
    Other CDs I have:
    OEM CDs for Power Mac G4:
    -Software Install, OS 9.2, CD vers 1
    -Software Install, OS 10.0.4, CD vers 1
    -Software Restore, OS 9.2 & 10.0.4 CDs vers 1, Discs 1-4 of 4.
    -OEM Apple Hardware Test; Power Mac G4, SW vers 1.2.1
    Applications on system Hard Drive that I don't have CDs for, that I rarely use, but I'd like to keep:
    -After Effects 5.0
    -QuickTime Player 6.0.2
    -Toast Audio Extractor 1.1
    -Toast Titanium 5.0.2
    Applications on system Hard Drive I use if my wife is busy on our Windows XP machine:
    -Photshop 6.0
    -Microsoft Word & Excel
    # of other Applications on System Hard Drive I either don't use or may be integral to the system: 260
    # of Control Panels:
    -Enabled: 34
    -Disabled: 0
    # of Extensions:
    -Enabled: 174
    -Disabled: 0
    note: a number of the applications and extensions are for AOL, Quickbooks, Microsoft Money and the like, as well as other things I don't use (Airport, USB printers, Networking, etc.)
    Smart things I did:
    -Regularly made backup copies of my FCP projects to the external drives.
    -Bought a copy of MacDrive so I can see what's on my External Drives on the XP machine.
    -Printed out System Profile before I installed upgrades.
    -Thoroughly searched this discussion board for and gathered as much info as I could before upgrading.
    Dumb things I did:
    -Made a copy, but not a clone, of my System Folder to one of the external drives when I first got it.
    -Didn't keep any sort of separate log of what's on the External Drives.
    -Never ran any sort of Disk Maintenance, even after one of the Externals crashed (DiskWarrior saved my butt on that).
    -Ignored some of the advice on this discussion board.
    Really dumb thing I did without even realizing it:
    Captured all media for a rush job onto my internal system Hard Drive, as well as storing and using massive jpgs for the same job on that same drive...
    Which led to painfully slow rendering times, and crashes caused by "Error: Out of Memory", which I interpreted as "Must buy more memory" and not "must make sure I'm not trying to edit media stored on system drive, especially with massive jpgs that I should reduce"
    RECENT UPGRADES:
    Here's what I did, and how I did it:
    Turned off system, disconnected all External FireWire Devices, disconnected Monitor, opened case, touched various metal parts of case and power supply to discharge any Static, unplugged power cable.
    -Installed 2 512MB sticks of "Lifetime" PC 133 SDRAM; total System RAM is now 1.5GB, all 3 DIMM slots now occupied.
    -Installed 1 Maxtor "DiamondMax" Ultra ATA/133 100GB Hard Drive (8 MB buffer) as "Slave" (no jumper) in top of U-Carrier above System Hard Drive; attached to middle of original Apple ribbon cable, attached available power plug.
    Taped spare jumper to inside of empty drive bay, noting origin and date. Did NOT push PMU button. Carefully closed case. Reconnected Monitor, did NOT reconnect any FireWire devices. Powered System on, but did NOT perform PRAM reset.
    I don't remember the exact order of what happened next, but I think: System booted up normally, a window popped up saying a new drive had been found, would I like to intitialize it?, which I did as Mac OS extended, and then named. If I was instructed to restart, I did so, otherwise did not. Clicked on "about this Mac" and saw that it now showed 1.5GB RAM. I then went about moving Media/Render files off the System drive (and one of the Externals) onto the Internal Drive, with a combination of FCP's Media Manager, and dragging from the Finder. After files had copied, dragged Media/Render files from System Drive to Trash. Opened FCP project, had FCP re-link to new locations of missing files. Saved, closed, and re-opened project, set Capture/Scratch disc to new internal Drive. At some point I changed FCP's Memory Allocation from whatever it was to 512000KB Minimum, and 900000KB Prefered (and I hope I got all those zeroes right). Did NOT restart after changing Memory Allocation, unless a window popped up instructing me to do so, in which case I did. Re-opened my project, rendered a few thing at a noticeably increased speed, saved everything, emptied the Trash, shut everything down, and called it a night as it was 4:30 am.
    A few hours later, I plugged the MiniDV and an External Drive into the FW ports and powered up the System. It was behaving extremely sluggishly. I would click on something, the pointer would turn into a wristwatch (sometimes with the minute-hand moving, sometimes not) and like an actual minute later, what I'd clicked on would open. All three drives were on the desktop, still had their files, and "About this Mac" still showed 1.5GB total Memory. So I powered down, disconnected the FW devices, waited a bit, and powered back up. Same sluggish response. I tried to open my FCP project file, and instead got a Window that said something to the effect of "The Application associated with this document could not be found". I think I tried to open FCP from the Applications folder on the System Drive and got the same message (I'd only had 3 hours sleep, no coffee, my client had died, and his family was coming for whatever I had in a few hours).
    LAME ATTEMPTS AT PROBLEM SOLVING THAT HAVE MADE THINGS WORSE
    Panic had set in, which never solves anything, so I don't remember what order I performed which tasks, between searching for clues in this forum, and convincing myself that that would be faster than trying to compose a question, waiting for a response, etc.
    The first two things I did, and I can't remember which I did first (both from Keyboard Commands during Restart):
    Rebuild Desktop
    PRAM Reset
    Neither of those solved the problem, so I continued.
    I tried restarting without extensions.
    I would get errors that said something like "Not Enough Memory to Open Finder".
    I tried booting from Disc 1 of the Software Restore Disk, which only wanted to destroy my data.
    I tried booting from the OS 10 disk, with the same result.
    I was finally able to boot from the OS 9.2 Software Install Disk, and actually saw both internal drives on the desktop, and the 1.5GB RAM in About this Mac. I tried to allocate more memory to Finder, but was informed that "Cannot Perform Requested Operation. This operation requires versions above 8.0".
    I think at this point I decided that I must have too many extensions, and started disabling ones I thought irrelevent to my cause (mostly anything that said "AOL", "Airport", "Ethernet", "Printer", "Modem", "Speakable", and a couple things called "Open TPT".
    It gets worse. Then I decided to turn off some "unnecessary" things via the control panels, but somehow managed to disable the control panels themselves: AppleTalk, DialAssist, File Sharing, Modem, Mouse (as I saw that Microsoft Mouse was among the others), Remote Access, Speech, USB Printer Sharing, and possibly TCP/IP.
    That certainly didn't help anything (though upon restarting from the OS 9.2 Disc I was able to see the extensions and control panels in their respective "Disabled" folders in the System Folder). But I still wasn't able to get more Memory to Finder.
    So, I decided a few more PRAM resets might help, which succeeded in making both Internal Hard Drives disappear. I tried booting up from the DiskWarrior disc, but even the Mighty DiskWarrior couldn't find the drives. I performed the longer, in depth version of the Apple Hardware Tools tests, which reported that everything's fine (including the new RAM), but made no mention of the Hard Drives at all. The deadline having long passed, I shut the system down. I read through more posts and tech articles, etc.
    I searched my External drives with MacDrive on my XP, and found the drive that has the copy of my System Folder (which shows all extensions and control panels as enabled); not sure if the Quicksilver will boot from that, I don't know what the Keyboard command for booting from a FireWire drive is (if there is one) and the drive itself only has 900MB of free space.
    I can't find any reference to Internal ATA drives anywhere in the MacDrive documentation; if it was possible I'd put them into the XP, get the files off the Mac drives, reformat them and install OS9 from the Discs.
    This is where I am now:
    The Quick Silver is still powered down. I removed the Microsft mouse and replaced it with the OEM Apple mouse. I opened the case, and removed the PRAM/Backup battery (manufacture date: July 2001). Couldn't find my voltmeter, so took the bat to Radio Shack and bought a new one. Had the Radio Shack guy test the old one: it showed 3.69 volts still. Have not installed the new battery yet. The case is still open, waiting for any advice any of you might have to offer.
    Thank you all so much for your patience in perusing and pursuing this.
    Sincerely,
    Patterson
    Power Mac G4 Quicksilver 867   Mac OS 9.2.x   17" Studio Display, 512MB RAM

    Thank you Rodney and John,
    The jumpers are correct for both Maxtor Drives.
    Rodney, you are correct in that the initial problem (slow rendering/"out of Memory" crashes) was caused by my not realizing I'd stupidly captured several GBs of media to my system drive, and not checking which drives those files were on (as I'd assumed I'd put them on one of my external media drives) once that problem presented itself.
    Before I'd determined what I'd done, I bought the extra RAM. After I'd found the media files on the System Drive, and saw that my dedicated media drives were too full to easily move them, I decided to buy an additional Internal drive so that I could:
    -Move the Media onto it relatively quickly and finish my urgent project.
    -Juggle all my media into a more organized fashion for archiving (as most of my projects are on-going long-term affairs)
    -Wipe it, Partition it, and clone my System Drive onto it, as a spare bootable drive in case my OEM System Drive failed.
    Copying the Media files onto the New Drive and moving the System Drive's Media files into the Trash worked great: huge improvement in Rendering, etc.
    Before shutting down for the night I Emptied the Trash, and was pleased with the amount of space I'd freed up on the System Drive.
    My guess is that the System Drive was terribly fragmented, having been subjected to intense use over the past 5 years without any sort of Drive Maintainence, and deleting that massive amount from it in one shot caused my extreme system sluggishness upon Startup the next day.
    My subsequent lame attempts to solve the sluggishnes ultimately resulted in my losing access to both drives.
    Today, I replaced the Backup Battery, pushed the PMU, re-attached the AC, and Powered Up with the case open as per your suggestion.
    It was trying for a few minutes (the gray screen went black at one point, and then returned to gray) before presenting me with the flashing question mark.
    There was, however, a quiet but distinct "buzzing" sound that would alternate: 1 sec "buzz", one second silence, one second "buzz", one second silence, etc. coming from the drives, even after the "?" appeared.
    I powered down, removed the Ribbon and Power Cables from the new "Slave" drive, and powered up again, with the exact same results.
    I powered down, removed the Ribbon and Power cables from the original "Master" drive, reinstalled the Jumper on the New Drive as "Master", plugged the End of the Ribbon and the Power cables into the New "Master" drive and powered up. The screen went to the "?" within 20 seconds instead of 4+ minutes, and no more "buzzing".
    I put the Apple Hardware Tools Disk in, ran the "long" test, and everything came out fine.
    I have to abandon this for now, but thanks again for your previous advice, and any more you may have!
    Cheers,
    Patterson

  • Memory configurations

    I just threw in my 4 corsair 3200 256s when I built this system not realizing the complexity of which you can affect memory in these new systems. I have K8N Platinum Sli board and for the 1st few days had problems of one sort of another, then ran Memtest and prime which both showed serious memory problems which I isolated to one of the strips which I have removed and have sent back to the seller. I have 3 slips in now ans wasnt particular which slots they went in, but they are all together.
    I have begun to notice forums with people discussing memory configs and altering them to get the best or stable performance. I have then looked at my moboard manual on this subject and it says, '...DO NOT install three memory modules on three DIMMs, or it may cause  some failure.' Is it telling me not to do what I have done? I have ran my system like this for 3 days without problems apart from the system hanging a couple of times in the middle of or after I had finished playing PES4. The manual also says ' Always insert the memory modules into the GREEN slots first, and it is strongly recommended not to insert the memory modules into the PURPLE slots while the green are left empty.'
    Is this in all cases or just if you are running Dual-channel? Is it better to just fill the green slots and run 512 or carry on running 768?

    1.  You have not changed any bios settings from Optimized defaults, is that correct? 
    2.  You are running 4x256 corsair value ram (identical chips on each stick)?
    3.  You have not given us a "sig" with your system specs and you should do that now.  See Forum guide for how to create a profile with a sig.  CPU-Z first tab will give all your cpu info.
    4.  Have you cleared cmos and, if you have not, you should do it as described in the manual (being careful to unplug your power supply and waiting 5 minutes before opening your case, moving JBAT1 jumper, then replacing JBAT1 jumper, closing case, and reinserting power supply plug. AFTER you have cleared CMOS when you reboot for the first time you should hit "del", set optimized defaults, f10, yes to save, and then reboot normally.
    If that does not work, proceed to the next steps.
    5.  It would be helpful if you ran CPU-Z with 4 sticks and showed us what it says under SPD tab for each slot (they should all be identical but check- if they are not all identical then your sticks are not identical and that explains everything) and then what Memory tab shows. There are things that can be done if the SPD result does or does not match Memory result, but we need to see the results first.
    6.  Download memtest and use it to see if you have a bad stick.  Run it for about 30 minutes or until you have completed at least two complete rounds of tests.  If you get errors, test sticks two at a time in slots 1 and 2 to see if there is one particular stick that is failing.  It's a process of elimination, time consuming and a PITA, but nobody said perfection was easy.  Clear cmos carefully as described in the manual before each test.  If you think you have isolated a bad stick, test it by itself in slot 1. If you think slot 1 is bad, use a single stick for your memtest and see if that stick fails in slot 1 and passes in slot 3.  If you get errors in memtest note what test the errors appeared in.
    I will be checking back online in about 8 hours and in the meantime, if you post some results and answers here, maybe somebody else can help too.  Phew....  I am tired just thinking about all of that.  Good luck.

  • Unable to enter serial number for Master Collection CS6 Upgrade

    I recently purchased a Master Collection CS6 upgrade (from 5.5). My CS6 serial number was correctly recognised but it said it couldn't find any software eligible for the upgrade despite Master Collection CS5.5 being installed on my PC (running Windows 7 Ultimate). The screen to enter the serial number of the eligible software doesn't have Master Collection CS5.5 in the drop-down, only CS5. Using that option with my CS5.5 serial number doesn't work. I got no response to a case opened on the support site.
    In order to install the CS6 software, I then installed it as a trial version. I now get reminders that I only have x days to go but there is no option to enter my serial number. I assume it thinks I've got a trial version of Creative Cloud.
    Adobe Support keep closing cases raised on the spurious grounds that I haven't responded. It is they that are not responding! Anyone able to help?
    Thanks in anticipation.

    if the serial number has been used, you won't be able to use that serial and that's the only thing you purchased.
    the installation files are free:
    Downloads available:
    Suites and Programs:  CC 2014 | CC | CS6 | CS5.5 | CS5 | CS4 | CS3
    Acrobat:  XI, X | 9,8 | 9 standard
    Premiere Elements:  13 | 12 | 11, 10 | 9, 8, 7 win | 8 mac | 7 mac
    Photoshop Elements:  13 |12 | 11, 10 | 9,8,7 win | 8 mac | 7 mac
    Lightroom:  5.7.1| 5 | 4 | 3
    Captivate:  8 | 7 | 6 | 5
    Contribute:  CS5 | CS4, CS3
    Download and installation help for Adobe links
    Download and installation help for Prodesigntools links are listed on most linked pages.  They are critical; especially steps 1, 2 and 3.  If you click a link that does not have those steps listed, open a second window using the Lightroom 3 link to see those 'Important Instructions'.

  • BT Infinity issues and poor service

    I reported an issue with the Infinity team that I can not access the internet several times a day and the only solution is to switch off the hub for several minutes and then switch it back on.
    After several calls to the helpdesk and not being provided with any information as to the 'fixes' which have been applied I was in a call yesterday for 15 minutes waiting for my call to be escalated as I requested. The call was cut off! I actually got a call back and an apology! I said that I had spent too long on the phone 'waiting' for someone to explain what had been done to date to attempt to resolve my issue but no answers were provided. I was informed that the case had been closed! I questioned why and was informed that someone had spoken to my wife and closed the case. This is incorrect as nobody has spoken to my wife and she would not state the issue had been resolved has it clearly has not!
    I was promised yesterday that a supervisor would phone me back to discuss the case as I am not happy at all. This poor service is costing me money as I am not capable of working without the broadband connection!
    I would like someone to take ownership of my issue and provide me with the service I expect from paying for this premium service!
    I've just looked at the closed case which I was informed had been re-opened I can see no update and that it is still closed!
    Please open it now and provide an update as promised on several occasions. 
    VOL011-49442052268
    Regards
    A very unhappy customer.

    JasonT wrote:
    I reported an issue with the Infinity team that I can not access the internet several times a day and the only solution is to switch off the hub for several minutes and then switch it back on.
    After several calls to the helpdesk and not being provided with any information as to the 'fixes' which have been applied I was in a call yesterday for 15 minutes waiting for my call to be escalated as I requested. The call was cut off! I actually got a call back and an apology! I said that I had spent too long on the phone 'waiting' for someone to explain what had been done to date to attempt to resolve my issue but no answers were provided. I was informed that the case had been closed! I questioned why and was informed that someone had spoken to my wife and closed the case. This is incorrect as nobody has spoken to my wife and she would not state the issue had been resolved has it clearly has not!
    I was promised yesterday that a supervisor would phone me back to discuss the case as I am not happy at all. This poor service is costing me money as I am not capable of working without the broadband connection!
    I would like someone to take ownership of my issue and provide me with the service I expect from paying for this premium service!
    I've just looked at the closed case which I was informed had been re-opened I can see no update and that it is still closed!
    Please open it now and provide an update as promised on several occasions. 
    VOL011-*********
    Regards
    A very unhappy customer.
    Hi there,
    Firstly, I would advise you to edit out your VOL number from your post for security reasons.
    Also, if you follow this link, it will allow you to fill out a "Contact us" form for the mods. Please remember to include all your account details in this and the mods should pick it up and contact you back.
    I hope this info helps.

  • How to block material issuing after sales order invoiced?

    As the subject mentioned,  could be a possible to block material issuing since sales order invoiced, or
    in the another words, after the sales order completed?
    Or could be a possible to set sales order as closed, and then material issuing related with this sales order are
    forbidden?
    Thanks in advanced,
    Zhou Zhen

    Dear Friend
    A sales order is created say order no 10000 and for material X say 10 units this order is delivered and PGIed and invoiced and the payment too has come
    That means the order 10000 is closed
    Case 1
    Now an user goes to VA02 t code and put this order no 10000 and changes the material X qty from 10 to 12 and opens up the whole order once again
    This can be controlled by using t code OVAH choosing message class the V4 message no 083 and change from warning to error
    Case2
    But to avoid the user to add material Y to the existing order say 10000 then i think we have to go for user exit
    Because the system doesnot even throw a warning message too in case 2 (according to my knowledge) and allows another line item to be added in the same order
    But you can test it if it throws any warning message we can try to convert that error
    But in case 2 it is not happening(even warning is not there)
    Regards
    Raja

  • Trying this again as I'm getting no where with Adobe Support!!!

    This should have been really simple. I have submitted this questions three times now as well as two separate support tickets, plus a call to Adobe support direct and basically no help at all!!!
    I need to rename our premier partner site post a merger which resulted in a company name change. I have updated the Adobe ID with mixed results (some parts of the service reference the old name (e.g., Kuler) and certain support services now say that the email address is not associated with that service (really helpful when you need to actually get support).
    I contacted Adobe support by phone only to be told that I needed to raise a ticket - not a problem more than happy to follow proper process! So I did that then I got a response which did not address the issue at all and basically said that if it was "TOTALLY NECESSARY" (well it's a business people we only bother with the "totally necesary" and you would think that trading under a different name with the partner site - which is meant to be used for marketing purposes (isn't that what you pay your $2000 for ??? - would be kinda necessary!!!! I mean really?).
    Ok so moving, on I was informed that the case would be escalated to Level 2 technical support. Then I heared absolutely nothing for five days except an auto generated email saying the case was about to be closed as the period to provide more information had lapsed. Well I had added more information to the email several times so clearly the case was never escalated and the support staff have just put it in the to delete pile (confirmed by the fact that the case no longer appears in the active case list or the closed case list - I have the emails and the case number - so what happened to the original case??? .
    So What happened Adobe / Business Catalyst - your support used to be world class. Now you're right up there with Lenovo after sales service (non existant)!
    So being the persistent chap I am (plus this must be resolved otherwise the new CEO is going to go balistic) I will provide the information again in the hope that someone from support will do the right thing and address my technical problems (not to mention the serious issues with Adobe support services):
    Old site URL: veridicalconsulting.businesscatalyst.com
    Old user email: (this is the origina ladmin user id that was used to request the move): [email protected]
    The new Partner Name: (this is the new Partner Portal name we want our partner site moved to): DMS.Group or DMS Group or DMS-Group depending on any naming convention restrictions.
    The new Partner URL: (the Partner's website address should be changed to): dms-group.businesscatalyst.com
    The new Partner user email: [email protected] (since changing this email does not access the support website - error 4)
    Permission to rename domain: Yes I formally request to have my partner site renamed per the details above
    Previous Ticket number (which seems to have been ignored) 81737 and 82912 as I keep getting 5 day lapse notices even though I was informed that it would be escalated to level 2 technical support.
    Could someone please do something about this as it's getting serious and we don't want the CEO getting involved (former barrister) and I don;t need the headache over what should be a relatively simple...ok this is what we are going to do....

    Hi Peter
    Renaming for the websites in your partner portal are fine. You just need to consider repathing as you've mentioned. You can do a find and replace to sort that..
    Remnaing for the Partner address I believe is a little more involved. It probably invoved Adobe Engineering. I think only Adobe could tell you how it affects the setup.  I believe you can't just rename the partner portal slug. Other things rely on it.
    But I can suggest that this isn't really in the scope of what Adobe are obligated to support. A partner program is purchased, they don't claim that it's customisable. But since you're a partner, Im sure if you're nice about it, log a ticket and ask Support to escatlate it to ACCOUNTS, then Accounts will be able to help. If you just ask support they will give you a dumb response and close the ticket. So ask to have it escalated.
    It'll mean that they may need to get engineering involved. Which takes the engineers away from developing BC.
    But I wouldn't allude to Barristers. It'll get you nowhere and this is your bag, not adobes.
    Brett

  • Photoshop CS6 Action Player Bug Make Adjustment Layer Applied to all to be Clipped

    On Oct.  11, 2010 I received the following from Adobe Support
    Hi John,
    This is to inform you that  we have been able to reproduce the same {Photoshop Actions} behavior at our end.
    So we have logged this issue with the Product Team and Engineering Team as Bug # 2737069. Adobe’s Engineering Team will look into this issue, and if in the future a resolution or fix is possible, it will be available from the Adobe Systems product update web site: http://www.adobe.com/downloads/updates/.
    You may also log this issue directly with our product teams, through the following Feature Request/Bug Form: https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform&samcap=EWQQL&promoid=EWQQL
    I am closing case # 181675168, if you have any new information, please contact Adobe Technical Support referencing the case number so that we may re-open the support incident.
    Thank you for choosing Adobe.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Rajdeep Kaur
    Technical Support Consultant (Tier 2)
    ADOBE Systems
    I reopened the case for there was no fix  Adobe contacted me and told me it would be fixed is some future release of Photoshop and once again case # 181675168 was closed over my objection.
    I was vocal about Adobe poor excuse for support in forums.   I then was contacted by Jeff Tranberry of Adobe he was asked to  contact me by John Nack to see if he could change me.  We exchanged some e-mails ending with Jeff writing unfortunately, you issues has been deemed low impact and has been deferred.
    May 7, 2012  I called Adobe to find out if this bug was fixed in Photoshop for I did not want to buy CS6 if the Bug was not fixed. After about an hour on the phone talking to many Adobe employees including Adobe Support  referenced case # 181675168 log as Bug # 2737069. I was told the bug was not in CS6.  So I ordered CS6.   FedX dropped off Today I installed it only to find the bug introduced is CS4 reported in CS5 is still in CS6.  
    Adobe when will you fix this bug # 2737069????

    Case History
    Case #0181636711 Assigned Bug # 2679265
    Updated
    Thursday, September 30, 2010 10:50:22 AM PDT
    Opened
    Thursday, June 10, 2010 8:21:19 PM PDT
    Status
    Withdrawn
    Product
    Photoshop CS5
    Support contract
    Adobe Support Program
    Subject
    CS5 Action Feature Bug
    NOTES & RESPONSES
    Notes from Customer
    Thursday, June 10, 2010 8:21:19 PM PDT
    CS5 has a bug recording and playing Actions that add Adjustments layers. Old actions recorded before CS5 and actions recorded with CS5 may or may not Play/Work correctly.
    Before there was an Adjustment Panel all Adjustment Layers were added applied to all layers and you needed to clip them after the were added if you wanted it clipped. The new adjustment panel made it possible to add a adjustment layer clipped to the current layer. However a clipping parameter is not recorded by the action recorder just the type and setting are recorded.
    When a make adjustment layer step is play it is either clipped or not depending on the state of the adjustment panel's clipping icon. If it not in the same state as it was when the action was recorded it will be add incorrectly. It would also be impossible to create an action that added some adjust layer clipped and others that are not.
    I feel the is a serious bug which needs to be addressed. I believe the solution is simple and even old actions will also work.
    Two patches are needed.
    One in the Action recorder. If the step being recorded is make adjustment layer and the adjustment panel icon state is clip to layer this needs to be recorded in the action step record. If the layer is to be applied nothing extra needs to be recorded in the step record just leave it as is like actions prior to the adjustment panel.
    The second patch in the Action Player.  If the step that is about to execute is a make adjustment layer. The Player needs to save away the state of the adjustment panel icon. Then check the adjustment step record to see if it is to be clipped. If so set the adjustment panel icon to the clipping state else set it to the all layers state. Then do/call the add adjustment layer function/routine on return restore the adjustment panels icon from the saved state. Proceed to the next step.
    I have been trying to report the bug for days. Please at least acknowledge you received my bug report.
    Thanks
    JJ
    Browser: Other
    Operating System: Windows XP
    Has it ever worked? If so, what's changed? (provide comments in description field): Not Applicable
    Same results with different file?: Not Applicable
    Same results with different computer?: Not Applicable
    Recent System Hardware or Software change?: Not Applicable
    Auto responsce from Abobe will close case unless we here from you
    Notes to Customer
    Friday, June 11, 2010 5:04:44 PM PDT
    Hi John,
    Thank you for contacting Adobe Technical Support. My name is Saurabh. This is in regards to your concern posted on Adobe web support portal
    regarding an issue with Adobe Photoshop CS5.
    I understand the importance of your time in getting the issue resolved and we assure you that this will be taken care of with utmost importance. We appreciate your cooperation with us.
    I would like to inform you that we are still researching on this issue. Once we find some new information, we will get back to you.
    I apologize fore the inconvenience caused.
    We are always happy to assist you however, in future if you face any problems with Adobe products, you may also try referring to our knowledge base & User to User forums by clicking on the following links:
    KnowledgeBase: http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/search/index.cfm
    User to User Forums: www.forums.adobe.com
    To know more about Adobe products, please visit our product page:
    www.adobe.com/products
    Your technical support case number for this interaction is: 181636711
    Thanks for contacting Adobe Technical Web Support and we appreciate your time spent.
    Have a nice day.
    PLEASE NOTE:We will be waiting for your reply on this case. In case you are unable to respond we will be sending you a reminder on the 2nd day (From the day of our response to you) and then the case will be auto closed on 7th day assuming your issue is resolved. However, you can reopen your case by visiting our web support portal and we will be happy to assist you further.
    Regards,
    Saurabh Jain
    Adobe Technical Support
    Notes from Customer
    Friday, June 11, 2010 6:01:35 PM PDT
    I consulted your knowledge base and I called customer support. This bug has not been listed. Custom support had me fill out a bug report at https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm? name=wishform which I did but that was not even acknowledged. I demonstrated the bug to customer support by sharing my screen.
    As for you forums for some reason the forum web site states my Adobe ID is disabled so I can not append or start a thread there id screen name jjmack. I created a new Adobe ID yesterday [email protected] that to seems to be disabled or I can not come up with any screen name the is availably I have tried many. Every simple or outlandish name I have entered generates the same message screen name not available. I'm at my wits end I've been using Photoshop since Photoshop version 3. Over the years it seems to get harder and harder to communicate with Adobe....
    Notes to Customer
    Saturday, June 12, 2010 1:58:07 PM PDT
    Dear John,
    Thank you for getting back to us with the required information and we appreciate your patience in helping us to resolve your issue as soon as possible.
    As this issue would require support from a senior level and hence I am forwarding your case to the next level of support for extensive research and to find a resolution for the problem at hand. I'll get back to you once we receive a reply from the concerned department.
    Please note that the expected turnaround time for resolution to this case from next level of support is 5 business days. I apologize for any inconvenience caused.
    We are always happy to assist you however, in future if you face any technical problems with Adobe products, you may also try referring to our knowledge base & User to User forums by clicking on the following links:
    KnowledgeBase: http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/search/index.cfm
    U2U Forums: www.forums.adobe.com
    To know more about Adobe products, please visit our product page:
    www.adobe.com/products
    Your technical support case number for this interaction is: 181636711
    Thanks for contacting Adobe Technical Web Support. Have a nice day.
    Regards,
    Saurabh Jain
    Adobe Technical Support
    Notes from Customer
    Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:03:49 PM PDT
    simpler then I first thought. Upon more investigation this is what I see.
    I skipped CS4 and when I installed CS5 I discovered a nasty bug had been introduced is Photoshop's Action facility most likely in CS4.
    Action that add adjustment Layers clipped to the current layer that step is recorded Make adjustment layer with Clip.
    Action that add adjustment Layers not clipped Step records as Make adjustment layer.
    When a step Make adjustment layer with Clip is played back that is what Photoshop does.
    When a step Make adjustment layer is played back what Photoshop does is look at the adjustment panel clipping icon state and and if it is clip to current layer Photoshop does clip the adjustment layer to the current when is should be applied to all.
    Many of the actions I have created add adjustment layer applied to all then later clip them to the current layer. These actions generate an error message if the Adjustment panel clipping icon is set to clip. Because the layer get added clipped clipping it is not available. The strange thing is the layer is clipped the way I wanted it to be. But actions I recorded where I want the adjustment to apply to all are clipped and the is no error message just wrong results.
    Notes from Customer
    Thursday, June 17, 2010 1:00:02 PM PDT
    I was told 24 hours to fix my ID. I kept myself logon this machine.now I can not even logon.
    Notes from Customer
    Friday, June 18, 2010 1:31:42 PM PDT
    My user ID is now operational again after I requested an password e-mail so I could reset my password. When I received the e-mail I was able to set my accounts password and once again participate in Adobe's forums.
    The is still no change in the status of my bug report. I would like to be able to play actions and know the will work the way there were recorded.
    Notes from Customer
    Saturday, June 19, 2010 6:56:24 AM PDT
    Create a one step action that add an adjustment layer that applies to all layers.
    Play that action with the icon in the adjustment panel is set to apply to all layers. Change the status of that icon to clip to layer and play the action again.
    You will find the first adjustment layer was added correctly apply to all layers like it was recorded the second adjustment was added clipped to layer when it should be applied to all...
    Notes to Customer
    Thursday, July 1, 2010 9:53:35 AM PDT
    Dear John,
    Thank you for contacting Adobe Technical Support. My name is sauarbh. This is in regards to your concern posted on Adobe web support portal regarding an issue with Adobe Photoshop CS5.
    I understand the importance of your time in getting the issue resolved and we assure you that this will be taken care of with utmost importance. We appreciate your cooperation with us.
    As your issue demands a real time interaction, so we are arranging a call back for you.
    Please provide the below mentioned information so that our call back team can contact you to resolve your issue:-
      1. Your Preferred Day to attend the call
      2. Your Preferred Time to attend the call
      3. Your Time Zone
      4 Your Phone Number
    The callback team works from 10 AM to 7 PM PST.
    Kindly revert to us with the above stated information so that our call back team can contact you within 24-48 working hours.
    Please note :- Our Call Back team works Monday through Friday.
    The callback team works from 10 AM to 7 PM PST.
    Regards,
    Sauarbh Jain
    Adobe Technical Support
    Notes from Customer
    Thursday, July 1, 2010 10:10:44 AM PDT
    Please provide the below mentioned information so that our call back team can contact you to resolve your issue:-
    1. Your Preferred Day to attend the call
    Mon through Friday
    2. Your Preferred Time to attend the call
    1 PM to 10 PM any time
    3. Your Time Zone
    Eastern USA Time
    4 Your Phone Number
    845-xxx-xxxx
    Notes from Customer
    Friday, July 2, 2010 8:43:30 PM PDT
    July 2 Adobe support called me once again they share my display and I demonstrated the bug for a second time. This time the stated they were recording my demo. After I demonstrated the bug they put me on hold for a while. Upon returning they informed me that there was still no circumvention or fix for this problem. They wanted to know if I was at the latest software level they were still sharing my display so I did a Photoshop Help About Photoshop to show I had the latest update Photoshop version 12.0.1. Told me they were not capable of handling this problem and would have to refer this to senior technical support that they would determine if it was a bug. What a joke Adobe junior technical support can not even recognize a bug when it has been demonstrated to them on two occasions now and also received several case update from me. Adobe you need better support personal.
    Notes to Customer
    Thursday, August 5, 2010 2:39:56 PM PDT
    Hi John ,
    Thank you for getting back to us.
    I would like to apologize for the delay in providing you a faster resolution to your issue and appreciate your patience with us.
    I would like to inform you that your issue has been logged as bug so the workaround is obviously to make sure the clip to layer is not enabled prior to running any of these actions.Also my Product Team and Engineering Team are working on this issue you can use the work around as mentioned above.
    This should resolve your issue. If it does, please let us know, however in case it does not; please revert with any new information that you might want to add which will help us in resolving your issue.
    You can also try referring to our knowledge base and User to User forums by clicking on the following links:
    Knowledgebase: http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/search/index.cfm
    U2U Forums: www.forums.adobe.com
    To know more about Adobe products, please visit our product page:
    www.adobe.com/products
    Your technical support case number for this interaction is: 181636711
    Thanks for contacting Adobe Technical Web Support and we appreciate your time spent.
    Have a nice day.
    PLEASE NOTE: we will be waiting for your reply on this case. In case you are unable to respond we will be sending you a reminder on the 2nd day (From the day of our response to you) and then the case will be auto closed on 7th day assuming your issue is resolved. However, you can reopen your case by visiting our web support portal and we will be happy to assist you further.
    Regards,
    Adobe Technical Support
    Notes from Customer
    Sunday, August 8, 2010 9:26:50 PM PDT
    Any work around does not solve my problem. Thousands have downloaded my actions. There is no way that I can contact them to make the aware of any work around. I can code around this bug but again I have no way to get the update to those that have downloaded my actions for they are free. All that is logged is the number of downloads. No registration is required so there is no way to contact the users that downloaded my actions. The problem will only be resolved when adobe updates Photoshop and fixes the problem.
    Notes to Customer
    Wednesday, August 11, 2010 1:58:23 PM PDT
    Hi John ,
    Thank you for getting back to us.
    I would like to apologize for the delay in providing you a faster resolution to your issue and appreciate your patience with us.
    I have logged this issue with my Product Team and Engineering Team as Bug #{2679265}. Adobe’s Engineering Team will look into this issue, and if in the future a resolution or fix is possible, it will be available from the Adobe Systems product update web site: http://www.adobe.com/downloads/updates/
    I am closing case#{181636711}, if you have any new information, please contact my team within 14 days, with the details, so we may re-open the support incident.
    You can also try referring to our knowledge base and User to User forums by clicking on the following links:
    Knowledgebase: http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/search/index.cfm
    U2U Forums: www.forums.adobe.com
    To know more about Adobe products, please visit our product page:
    www.adobe.com/products
    Your technical support case number for this interaction is: 181636711
    Thanks for contacting Adobe Technical Web Support and we appreciate your time spent.
    Have a nice day.
    Regards,
    Adobe Technical Support
    Notes from Customer
    Thursday, August 12, 2010 9:13:56 PM PDT
    This case should not be closed till there is a fix for this bug. How can Adobe Support close a bug report when Adobe acknowledges its a bug where Adobe Support does not provide a fix. Blowing smoke with statements like "if in the future a resolution or fix is possible, it will be available from the Adobe Systems product update web site". Photoshop CS3 work correctly Adobe broke the Action Player in CS4 and its still broken is CS5. "if a fix is possible!"!!! Are you joking? What kind of support is that? Do you get a bonus for closing bug reports without fixing the bug? Does it make you look good inside Adobe. I can tell you from the outside there is a foul stench emulation from Adobe Technical Support.
    Notes to Customer
    Monday, August 16, 2010 2:30:22 PM PDT
    Dear John ,
    Thank you for getting back to us with the required information and we appreciate your patience in helping us to resolve your issue as soon as possible.
    This issue would require support from a senior level and hence I am forwarding your case to the next level of support for extensive research and to find a resolution for the problem at hand. I'll get back to you once we receive a reply from the concerned department.
    Please note that the expected turnaround time for resolution to this case from next level of support is 5 business days. I apologize for any inconvenience caused.
    We are always happy to assist you however, in future if you face any technical problems with Adobe products, you may also try referring to our knowledge base & User to User forums by clicking on the following links:
    KnowledgeBase: http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/search/index.cfm
    U2U Forums: www.forums.adobe.com
    To know more about Adobe products, please visit our product page:
    www.adobe.com/products
    Your technical support case number for this interaction is: 181636711
    Thanks for contacting Adobe Technical Web Support. Have a nice day.
    Regards,
    Adobe Technical Support
    Notes to Customer
    Thursday, August 26, 2010 4:25:48 PM PDT
    Dear John ,
    Thank you for getting back to us with the required information and we appreciate your patience in helping us to resolve your issue as soon as possible.
    I would suggest you to please go to through the KB document to move actions from Photoshop CS4 to CS5 given below :
    http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/860/cpsid_86020.html
    Please make sure about the loaction of actions which you created or saved in Photoshop CS4, go to that location and make sure you have all the actions there.
    Did it ever work in Photoshop CS5?
    Try to make a copy of the action that he is trying to run, remove the 'Hide' command and re-record hide in PS CS5, put it into the action, and see if that works.
    Or try making a short action along with Hide command . If this works, then something might have got changed between the version.
    KnowledgeBase: http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/search/index.cfm
    U2U Forums: www.forums.adobe.com
    To know more about Adobe products, please visit our product page:
    www.adobe.com/products
    Your technical support case number for this interaction is: 181636711
    Thanks for contacting Adobe Technical Web Support. Have a nice day.
    Regards,
    Adobe Technical Support
    Notes from Customer
    Friday, August 27, 2010 8:15:11 PM PDT
    This is the reply I received from adobe support you. I want this case open till it is resolved. Your trying everything to close it unresolved. Now your giving me instructions on how to migrate from CS4 which I don't have??? Please fix bug #{2679265}.
    ++++++++++From Adobe support+++++++++
    I have logged this issue with my Product Team and Engineering Team as Bug #{2679265}. Adobe’s Engineering Team will look into this issue, and if in the future a resolution or fix is possible, it will be available from the Adobe Systems product update web site: http://www.adobe.com/downloads/updates/
    I am closing case#{181636711}, if you have any new information, please contact my team within 14 days, with the details, so we may re-open the support incident.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Notes to Customer
    Monday, August 30, 2010 5:14:11 PM PDT
    Hi John ,
    Thank you for replying back.
    I would like to inform you that that we are working in techinical support department and fixing any issues or Bug with the product is done by the developers team. As they are already working on it and we don't have any update as how much time that gonna take. If you want we can have the case as open and as soon as there is any fix for the same, you will be getting the update on Adobe website.
    I hope this will address your concern.
    You can also try referring to our knowledge base and User to User forums by clicking on the following links:
    Knowledgebase: http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/search/index.cfm
    U2U Forums: www.forums.adobe.com
    To know more about Adobe products, please visit our product page:
    www.adobe.com/products
    Your technical support case number for this interaction is: 181636711
    Thanks for contacting Adobe Technical Web Support and we appreciate your time spent.
    Have a nice day.
    Regards,
    Adobe Technical Support
    Notes from Customer
      Tuesday, August 31, 2010 7:51:16 PM PDT
    Yes leave it open
    Notes from Customer
    Monday, September 6, 2010 5:57:14 AM PDT
    Thank You
    Adobe Support Call me and told me it would be fixed in the next release of Photoshop and asked me if they could close the case. I replyed IMO that is not the proper thing to do do what you want...
    ========================================================================================== ========================
    As you can see Adobe marked the case
    Status
    Withdrawn
    by Adobe over my objection.

Maybe you are looking for