Electronic Bank Statement and Bank Accounts change...Statement Upload

Hi,
I have an issue with electronic bank processing.
Currently my client is using A100 company code and bank account 123456 gl code 45000 and they are updating bank statements through electronic bank statement.
Now they have activated A200 company code and they want to use same bank account 123456 and gl code 45000 in new company code and the entire electronic bank statements need to be updated into A200 and A100 company code will exist in sap but client dont want to use this.
What customizations need to be done in SAP and how system will come to know A200 company code need to be updated when they update electronic bank statement next time?
Is there any specific customization in sap that shifts company codes and gl codes for electronic bank statement uploads?
What will happen to historic data when the same gl codes are used with different company codes?
Once the F110 is executed there will be batch job which will run to upload file...do we need to change anything here....
Jaya.

Hello-
Are you saying going forward you are are not going to use A100 and start using A200? If so, from an EBS config standpoint, all you would have to do is use the same transaction type and remove the assignment of old company code & bank account + bank key to the transaction type and enter the new assignment to new company code.
Next, make sure to create all the bank accounts and clearing accounts in the new company code (assuming all the config related to bank is completed).
This is it. When you upload using FF.5, it will look at the bank account number from the upload file and look for the company code.
Hope this helps.
Shail

Similar Messages

  • Regarding Bank key and Bank account number

    Hi All,
    I have a query regarding Bank key and Bank account number.
    I want to set bank account number length as 9 digits. so I set it @ below path
    SPRO -> SAP NetWeaver-> General settings -> Set countries -> Set country specific checks.
    I tried to change the bank account number length to 9 digits from existing 10 digits using transaction FI12.
    But while changeing the bank account system throws an error like "Bank account number or bank number are not of valid length".
    Can any one suggest solution on this?
    Thanks in Advance!
    Regards,
    Nidhi

    Dear Nidhi,
    It seems that earlier bank account number contained 10 digits and then setting was changed to 9 digits that may be the cause of the error. Do one thing, go back to country setting and restore the bank account number digit to 10. Then make changes to bank account number to 9 digits. Make similar changes to all bank in your company code which has 10 digits.
    Then go to country settings and make account number digit to 9 digit which will prevent bank account number to be 10 digits created in future.
    Regards,
    Chintan Joshi.

  • Difference of Bank key and Bank Account

    Hi,
    Can Some one guide me to unsderstand the maning of,
    1) Bank Key and Bank Account in Vendor Master ?
    2) Bank Key and Bank Account number in FI12 Tcode ?
    3) Because My understanding is In FI12 T Code those are our company code banks thorugh which payment is done to Vendors correct me if Iam wrong.
    Points will be awarde.
    Regards,
    Pallavi.

    Hi Pallavi,
    Press F1 help in the Bank key field, this is the information you find there:
    Bank key you specify the bank key under which bank data from the respective country is stored.
    When you define the country key, you also specify the country-specific definition of the bank key.
    Normally, you manage banks using their bank number. The bank number in the control data for the bank is then displayed twice, that is, as the bank key too.
    In certain countries, the bank account number takes on this function; then there are no bank numbers and the bank data is managed using the account number.
    For data medium exchange, you may find it useful to be able to enter foreign business partners without a bank number, even if there are bank numbers in the country in question. In this case, the bank key can be assigned internally.
    To manage bank data using another key, for example, the SWIFT code, external number assignment can also be used.
    Bank Account number is your account number in the respective Bank.
    Please reward points if helpful.
    Regards,
    Sreekanth....

  • Check in vendor master record between Bank Key and Bank Account for Belgium

    Hi all, just a request.
    In Belgium the first three digits of the Bank Account are always equal to the Bank Key.
    Unfortunately SAP does not check if they are different.
    Is there a standard check or should I "offer" a custom control?
    Thanks a lot !!!

    Dear,
    I checked right now in SPRO, but no validation with combination of Bank key and Bank account - that to particular first 3 digits not available. Option available is with ABAP Development.
    Option 1.
    You create Bank key using transaction FI01. Remove authorizations for FI01 from all users [Hope this already exists in your system].
    In vendor master, if you enter Bank key - which also selectable with F4 option, if bank key manually entered and PRESS ENTER, one more new screen open to enter Bank data. That means after pressing enter system validating our entries in bank key with database and when not available, populating new window to enter new entries.
    Now when ENTER pressed, suggest Development team to display an Error message 'Bank Key XXXXXXX not available'. By this user cannot enter a bank key as their wish.
    Once valid bank key selected from selection screen - validate bank account entry first 3 digits of Bank key 3 digits entered. If not matched - Error message.
    Option 2.
    Simply remove authorizations for XK01, XK02, MK01, MK02, FK01, FK02 from all users and authorize only one user in creation of Vendor master who aware and take care of entries.
    Regards,
    Syed Hussain.

  • Bank Charge and Bank Overdraft Fees Master data

    HI Expert,
    When i am Running Bank  Manual Reconciliation(FF67), I am not able to run successfully.i am getting error-there is no open item found for Bank Charge and Bank Overdraft fees.
    however i made bank charge and bank overdraft fees as normal G/L. My question is  that ,in real scenario how we maintain these two G/L,as normal or as clearing G/L(Open item Management in FS00).
    Though i have tried in two before running FF67.
    Bank Charge a/c Dr.
    To SBI Check outgoing.
    i have also maintain Posting Rule for bank charge and overdraft  fess.
    Thanks in Advance

    Hi,
    Bank charges and Overdraft fees will not be an open item account.
    But your bank clearing account will be an open item account.
    Error may be due to the incorrect posting rule defined.
    Regards
    SM

  • Bank key and bank number

    Dear experts,
    What is the significance of maintaining bank key in vendor master? Can multiple bank codes/numbers be assigned against one bank key  or do I have to create as many bank keys as there are bank codes/numbers?
    What is the corelation between bank key and bank code or bank number?
    Thanks in adv,
    Vijaya

    Hi
    Bank Key used to identify the House Bank. Generally we manage banks using Bank Number.
    The Bank Number is used as Bank Key
    In case of absense of Bank Number, the transactions will be done using Bank Key
    We can't maintain multiple bank numbers/bank keys
    we maintain bank key in vendor master, it is mandatory in ecc6 to if you do automatic payment to vendors.
    Hari P

  • Bank statement and bank clearing document splitting

    Hi,
    We have main bank and bank clearing accounts classified as cash category.
    Our bank statement uses a Z document type that posts transactions such as:
    - debtor to main bank
    - vendor to main bank
    - expense to main bank
    - revenue to main bank
    Thereafter, the bank clearing that is done between main bank and bank clearing account (so a cash to cash rule is needed based on the GL account classification)
    We needed to use an unspecified posting rule to cater for the bank statement posting as the standard did not allow us to add vendor, debtor, expense, revenue as base item categories. But it doesnt allow us to add cash to cash.
    How should we configure document splitting to cater for this?

    Hi ,
    First of all  i hope you are clear with the concept of Incoming , otugoing and main bank account that we need to create 3 or more diffrent bank accounts for reconcilliation purpose .
    the case here is that you cant to do a manual statement upload then in that case you will have to take care of following things .
    How is the information transferred from FICA to FICO means along with the reconcilliation key what else information are you passing on to FI in the documents .
    Secondly in the bank statement are you getting the reconcilliation key ??? or what information are you getting in the bank statement ???
    because the integration of FI and FICA is the reco key and it becomes very crucial for you to have the same in the bank statement .
    thirdly , Use the manual reconcillaiton functionality provided in FI for reconciling the same , where in you will have to configure the manual bank statement functionality and by using the T code ff67 you can reconcile it .
    Hope this suffices the prupose .
    Do revert back in case of any other queries .
    cheers ,
    dewang

  • Electronic Batch Payment and Bank Account Assignment Details

    Hello,
    We are having an issue with Electronic Payments and it Account Assignment, as you know when you are adding the banking details you have the option to assign it to the Supplir,Site or Address, ect.
    If I assign it to the supplier, it works perfectly when doing quick and batch payments, but if I assign it to the site (which is what I will need) it works perfectly when doing a quick payment, but when I do a batch payment all the information regarding the bank account, check digits and account type comes as 0000.
    Please help, I dont know what else to do.
    Regards and Thanks,
    M,

    Hello,
    We are also in r12.1.1, there is a way I can send the template I am using or you can help me to review the setup. I dont really know what should be the problem.
    Please Help.
    Thanks and Regards,
    M.

  • Profit-center determination of bank subaccounts and bank accounts ; with new GL.

    The question here-under has been asked a number of times on forums, though never answered really to my knowledge. Let me try to get it formulated once more :
    - When a customer invoice is posted, the receivable is properly split per profit-center thanks to the active splitting solution.
    - When the customer invoice is paid through a bank transfer, the following happens generally :
         The bank statement posts a first area 'debit' bank and 'credit' bank sub-account on a default profit-center (this posting needs to happen first because SAP aims to have the 'bank' posted as quickly as possible 'in the morning' leaving the manual clearing activities 'in the afternoon').
         The bank statement posts a second area 'debit' bank sub-account and 'credit' + 'clearing' receivable. There, the combination of passive splitting and inheritence makes sure that the profit center of the invoice receivable line items is also used for this entire posting.
    - Manually or through automatic clearing, the bank sub-account gets cleared. Since the 2 sides have different profit-centers, the systems posts adjustment lines to the zero balance clearing account.
    My question : for companies that want to achieve an entire balance sheet per profit-center, it is a problem that the bank account debit and bank sub-account credit are still with a default profit-center. I understand that the splitting solution in new GL does not offer a way to solve that. One needs to adjust the profit-center on the bank account and bank-subacccount with an allocation cycle in EC-PCA. Is my understanding correct or is there a better solution available in New GL  ?
    Thanks for your replies.
    José Beghein 

    Hello Ronghua,
    Many thanks for your reply. This note is extremely interesting and gives a lot of technical information on the differences between classic PCA and new GL PCA.
    I nevertheless did not find clearly what is considered the best practice towards splitting bank account positions.
    Kind regards.
    José Beghein

  • Financial Statement and Alternative Account Number (China)

    Hi all,
    I have created a nice financial statement based on "normal" GL account number, and through this I can have a nice formatted balance sheet and profit and loss account.
    For china, I need the financial statement with the alternative account number displayed.  For example: My normal GL Account is 181000, and alternative account number is 10010101 .
    During running the F.01 - Balance sheet, I check the options of "alternative account number" under the tab of special evaluations, but the output of the balance sheet and profit and loss does not give me a nice format.
    All of the accounts are displayed under section Account not assigned (This is because alternative account number is 10010101 is not assigned to the financial statement version).
    Could anyone advise how to overcome this problem?
    Thanks.

    Ok ...
    I half way solve my problem with the following reference:
    http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-acct/country-specific-coa-1453275
    There is another issue of my Financial statement:
    The following is my scenario:
    I have Operational Chart Of Account, OCA1, and GL's are as followings:
    GL1000 linked with alternative GL account (GL9001 - Chart of account - ACA1)
    GL2000 linked with alternative GL account (GL9002 - Chart of account - ACA1)
    GL3000 linked with alternative GL account (GL9003 - Chart of account - ACA1)
    GL4000 No link to any alternative GL (because does not use or need this)
    My Financial statement version is FSV9, made up (must be, based on my testing) using GL Account (which are GL9001 and GL9002) and chart of account is ACA1.
    During the financial statement F.01, the GL4000 ends up with the following message at the bottom of the financial statement: <b>No alternative acct no.maintained for G/L acct 4000 in co.code ....</b>
    Note: GL4000 does not have any balances.
    Note: If GL4000 has balances, it is displayed under un-assigned section, and the value does not affect the profit and loss od the statement.
    Question: How can I solve the issue:
    1) Do not display the GL4000, which does not have alternative GL account.

  • My daq card PCI6025e' digital ports PA,PB,PC are in high state and cannot be changed even in MAX 2.1 testing panel and continuously output 5 volts even set for output.

    my digital ports PA,PB,PC are in high state and cannot be set low even if it is set for outputs.
    Thanks

    The MAX utility is the closest to the driver level and will eliminate software configuration as a possible issue. Please disconnect anything that you have connected to the DIO lines.
    Use the MAX test panel for your DIO lines, configure them as outputs, and set them to a low state. Use a multimeter (DMM) to observe the line state. If it is still high then you may have a problem with your hardware. If this is the case, I advise calling National Instruments support and investigate a possible RMA (repair).
    Best Regards,
    Justin Britten
    Applications Engineer
    National Instruments

  • Bank Country and Bank Key?

    Hi,
    Two questions which I am not very clear.
    1. For bank country, is the country the bank(branch) located at? For example, company in China have a vendor in US, and the bank of the vendor also in US, so the bank country should be US?
    2. Bank key. I heard that some country had a bank directory, and all will use a same bank key. Is this right? In China, and Hongkong, I did not find a defined bank key list, and we use our own naming conversion to define the bank key.

    Hello Kerry Liu,
    Bank country is the field that identifies the country in which the bank is located.
    The country key defines the rules according to which bank data, such as the bank and account numbers, is to be validated.
    Bank Key-In this field, you specify the bank key under which bank data from the respective country is stored.
    When you define the country key, you also specify the country-specific definition of the bank key.Normally, you manage banks using their bank number. The bank number in the control data for the bank is then displayed twice, that is, as the bank key too.In certain countries, the bank account number takes on this function; then there are no bank numbers and the bank data is managed using the account number.
    For data medium exchange, you may find it useful to be able to enter foreign business partners without a bank number, even if there are bank numbers in the country in question. In this case, the bank key can be assigned internally.
    To manage bank data using another key, for example, the SWIFT code, external number assignment can also be used.
    Hope this helps. please assign points.
    Rgds
    Manish

  • Problems with overage charges and making account changes on line

    I have quite a bit of history involving my attempts to resolve the problem of catching my account before it goes over the minutes allowed and making the changes on line (to cut down on call volume) to change my account to raise the minutes allowed for that billing cycle.  I was given one reason why it didn't work the first time (I didn't print out my confimation proving I made the changes - bit the bullet and paid those charges) and so the second time wanting to avoid the problem from the first time I made sure I printed out my confirmation.  The confirmation had an effective date of change of 07/19/2012 the day I was informed I was nearing my allowed minutes.  There were only 4 or 5 maximum days left in that billing cycle so I wanted to nip the problem in the bud and make the changes to my account to be made "that" day.  My confirmation said the changes were effective 07/19/2012.  In plently of time before that billing cycle ended.  Again I was told I did something wrong.  This time I'm holding my confirmation in my hand even as the person is telling me again I did it wrong.  The purpose Verizon wants it's customers to use the available on-line option is to cut down on their call volume.  I didn't go to school to get the knowledge apparantly needed to perform these particular tasks in a manner that is acceptable to Verizon.  Has anyone else had problems with trying to fix their problems themselves using Verizons "helpfull" on-line choice?

    I have an explanation for you by what was meant by "you did it wrong."
    When you make a change effective the date you are requesting it and not at the start or end of your billing cycle, your minute usage for that month is pro-rated.
    For example, you say you made a change, because you were nearing your allowance limit, on 7/19/2012 and wanted it effective that day with 5 days left in the billing cycle. Lets assume that your allowance is 700 minutes/month and you were at 675 minutes for that month(still under your monthly allowance). If you make a change effective with 5 days left in your billing cycle to the 1400 minute/month allowance, your allowance for the 1st 25 days of your cycle will have been pro-rated to (25/30) * 700 = 583 minutes. This would mean you would have already had an overage of 92 minutes for the 1st 25 days of the month. Additionally, you would have a pro-rated allowance to use the last 5 days of (5/30) * 1400 = 233 minutes. This is how the pro-rating works when you make a change effective during the middle of your billing cycle.
    What you need to do next time to avoid these overage charges is to make the change effective at the beginning of your current billing cycle. So if you had made the change on 7/19/2012, but your billing cycle ended on 7/24/2012(5 days later), you should have made the change effective at the beginning of your current billing cycle, or 6/24/2012. This is called backdating the change. In this instance, you would have received a credit on you account for the cost of the 700 minute plan and been charged the full amount for the 1400 minute plan on your next bill, which I believe is a net additional charge of $10 and you would have had the use of 1400 minutes for throughout the entire month. In this example, you would not have had any overage with your 675 minutes during the 1st 25 days of your cycle and would have been able to use 725 minutes over the last 5 days of your billing cycle. This is much better than the overage charge you would receive with 92 overage minutes @ $0.45/minute = $41.40.
    I hope this explains it.

  • Has anyone ever had an email from Apple asking them to update their details for their Apple account on IPad? Kinda worried as it asks for my bank details and bank account number and security code on the back of the card. Thanks :)

    Has anyone ever had an email from Apple on IPad asking them to update their account details? The email seems genuine enough as it asks you to sign in with your Apple ID and password and takes you through to the Apple site but am a bit worried as they ask you in the section Update Your Apple account for bank and credit card details and for the security number on the back of the card. Also in the section where it asks for my mobile number it will only take 10 numbers and when ai try to put in the final (11th number) it won't let me. Sorry am new to all this and a bit confused! Any help is gratefully appreciated.....Thanks.

    That is phishing attack
    Someone, other then Apple, sent it to you
    Read http://support.apple.com/kb/ht4933
    Allan

  • External Bank Setup and Bank Reconciliation Issue

    Hello Friends!
    I have a question regarding external bank setup in the Banking module of PeopleSoft. Peoplebooks say that you have to define your external bank accounts so that there are no duplicate general ledger business unit and general ledger account combinations. This will cause issues during Bank Reconciliation. Does anyone know what knid of issues are faced? We are actually planning to use one cash account for all banks for a GLBU. But along with every account there is another chartfield so even if the cash account is the same for a GLBU, the combination of account and the other chartfield will be unique. Will this work for bank to book reconciliation?
    Thank you in advance!

    You can go to Administration> System Initialisation>Company details> basic initialisation> (check) Bank Processing.
    Also, you need to do a few set ups before you start using the bank statement facility. You can find this in SET Up> Banking> Bank Statement Processing.
    When you check this, you would be able to see the Bank Statement Processing Form in the banking module.
    all the information that you might need for the Bank Statement Processing for versions A and B can be found in the Portal under the following path:
    SAP Portal -> Support -> Documentation Resource Center -> Modules and Features -> Bank Statement Processing (BSP)
    Hope the documentation helps you.

Maybe you are looking for