Email search will produce invalid results.

a search of an email folder where the search criteria involves the body of the email will produce invalid results
Either in Webmail interface or via IMAP client (e.g. Thunderbird 1.5.x or 1.x) a search of an email folder where the search criteria involves the body of the email will produce invalid results (results set includes emails which don't match the search criteria).
e.g.
10 emails in an email folder
5 emails' body contains the phrase "fuzzy-bunny"
A search for body contains "fuzzy-bunny" will return more than just the 5 emails.
EMAIL SERVER VERSION:
iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.09 (built Nov 18 2005)
libimta.so 5.2 HotFix 2.09 (built 10:35:58, Nov 18 2005)
As anyone seen this before. Possibly a fix in later Hotfixes?
Thanks in advance.

Indeed, this is a known issue.
Fixed in hotfix 2.11. You will want to contact support for the current hotfix.
Though, I would strongly suggest that you be in the planning stage for upgrade to 6.3. 5.2 is due for End Of Support Life, very soon.

Similar Messages

Query that only returns items that will produce a result

Thanks to Mack for his help yesterday. I would really appreciate some help from anyone who is more SQL competent than I am. I have an SQL problem that is just completely over my head. I've created a nifty tagging system for the blog, that sorts by tags and by multiple tags, check out the beta here: http://committedsardine.com/blog.cfm
When a user selects a tag, it adds it to the value list SESSION.blogTags. If the selected tag is there already, it removes it. When the list for tags pops up, I output all the tags, and show their state. You'll see what I mean if you try it.
What this leads to is the ability to select a group of tags for which there are no query results. What I want to do is only show those that will generate results and how many results they'll show. Like this, select "fluency" by itself there are 310 entries
fluency (310) | digital (234) | writing (12)
Once fluency is selected, there are 13 articles that ALSO are tagged by "digital", but none that are tagged by writing:
fluency | digital (12) | writing
I have a table called blogTagLinks, that is just for tying a tag to a blog. It lists a blogID and a tagID. Here is a sample of it for reference:
blogTagLinkID
blogID
tagID
4
2
2
5
2
3
6
2
5
39
1
18
49
1
1
42
1
9
44
1
19
47
5
14
48
1
22
54
16
22
I'm including all my sql, but the spot that I need help with is marked in red below:

<cfquery name="rsAllTags" datasource="">
SELECT tagsID, tagName
        FROM tags
        WHERE tagActive = 'y'
</cfquery>
<cfset allTags = ValueList(rsAllTags.tagsID)>
<cfif isDefined("URL.blogTags")>
    <cfif ListFind(allTags, URL.blogTags) NEQ 0>
        <cfif ListFind(SESSION.blogTags, URL.blogTags) NEQ 0>
            <cfset SESSION.blogTags = ListDeleteAt(SESSION.blogTags, ListFind(SESSION.blogTags, URL.blogTags))>
            <cfelse>
            <cfset SESSION.blogTags = ListAppend(SESSION.blogTags, URL.blogTags)>
        </cfif>
    </cfif>
</cfif>

<cfquery name="rsAvailableTags" datasource="">
SELECT tagsID, tagName
        FROM tags
        WHERE tagActive = 'y'
        NEED SOME STATEMENT HERE OF BLOGTAGLINKS TO DETERMINE WHAT TAGS WILL PRODUCE A RESULT
</cfquery>

<cfif isDefined("SESSION.sb") AND SESSION.sb EQ "tg">
    <cfquery name="rsTags" datasource="">
        SELECT tags.tagName, tagsID
        FROM tags
        WHERE tagsID <cfif SESSION.blogTags NEQ "">IN(#SESSION.blogTags#)
        <cfelse> = 0</cfif>
    </cfquery>
    <cfset variables.newrow = false>
</cfif>

<cfquery name="rsBlog" datasource="">
    SELECT blog.blogID,
        blog.storyID,
        blog.blogDate,
        blogStories.storyID,
        blogStories.blogTitle,
        SUBSTRING(blogStories.blogBody,1,200) AS blogBody,
        images.imageName
    FROM blog, blogStories, images
    WHERE blog.storyID = blogStories.storyID AND images.imageID = blog.photoID AND blog.blogDate < "#todayDate#" AND blog.deleted = 'n'
<cfif SESSION.sb EQ "kw">AND CONCAT(blogStories.blogBody, blogStories.blogTitle) LIKE '%#SESSION.blogKeywords#%'</cfif>
    <cfif SESSION.sb EQ "tg" AND SESSION.blogTags NEQ "">
            AND blog.blogID IN (
            SELECT blogID
            FROM blogTagLink
            <cfif SESSION.blogTags NEQ "">
                WHERE tagID IN(<cfqueryparam cfsqltype="cf_sql_integer" value="#SESSION.blogTags#" list="true">)
                GROUP BY blogID
                HAVING count(tagID) = #ListLen( SESSION.blogTags )#)
            </cfif>
     </cfif>
ORDER BY blog.blogDate DESC
</cfquery>

There might be a single query solution but here's a query that you
will need to run for each tag in the database (cfloop over all the
tags) and will give you the number of blogs that have the selected
tags + the current tag
SELECT Count(*) AS blog_count
FROM (
    SELECT blogID
    FROM blogTagLink
    WHERE tagID IN(<cfqueryparam cfsqltype="cf_sql_integer"
value="#SESSION.blogTags#" list="true">)
         OR tagID = #currentTagID#
    GROUP BY blogID
    HAVING count(tagID) = #ListLen( SESSION.blogTags )#
         OR count(tagID) = #ListLen( SESSION.blogTags )# + 1
    ) AS blogs
Mack

IWeb Error: "Your search did not produce any results."

I just updated my iWeb and added the new search and comment features to my iWeb site. I am happy to see these features added but the search feature gives me a page displaying "Your search did not produce any results." Does anyone else have this issue? I am using my .Mac account and did a "Publish all to .Mac" to see if that would help. Comments work great. Can anyone help? Not good to have a feature that does not work.
Cheers!
Patrick

I am having the same problem and can probably give you an answer as to why the search feature is not working...
Look carefully and you may notice that by re-publishing your site with 1.1, iWeb has converted all text on your site to image files (probably .png). This is what happened when I re-published.
Therefore, there is technically no text to "search" through...
No fix as of yet... I will ttry to republish yet again tonight

Robohelp 9 WebHelp - Searching doesn't produce any results.

Hi, I upgraded to RoboHelp 9 last week and now searching in Webhelp doesn't produce any results. I've created a new project, used the sample project, tried generating it to a new folder and results remain the same.
When I select the search tab, the status bar flutters with the "Waiting for file...." displayed indefinetly with the occassion display of the javascript: (void);
Screens shots are from the RH 9 sample project. Results are the same with my projects. CHMs generated work fine!
Any suggestions?

Mary
You added the problem to another thread that was not related as the issue there is the use of HTTPS. I have deleted that post.
You also started a second thread with a the same question. I don't understand how asking the question twice will help so I have locked that thread but created a link to this thread so that anyone with an answer can help you. If there is a reason for starting a second thread, please let me know.
Please just ask once and wait for a reply as this wastes moderator's time that is better used trying to answer questions.
Now to the problem. Searching with Chrome installed works just fine for most people so the problem seems to be local to you. If I have read you correctly, after installing Chrome, the search breaks no matter what browser is used.
Was that checked on other machines or just yours?
IGNORE THIS QUESTION - The answer is YES and that was in the post.
Did you also check that search was broken with the supplied sample projects? I know that works with the three browsers being discussed here?
Where was the help installed when tested by you both standalone and from the application?
Questions 2 and 3 are really only related to problems with Chrome. I have not seen anyone report Chrome also breaking the search in the other browsers. There's more to this than meets the eye as Chrome has not caused that problem for anyone else, or at least, no one has reported it.
See www.grainge.org for RoboHelp and Authoring tips
@petergrainge

BUG in iOS7: Post iOS7 upgrade, search option does not work for "Messages". If you want to search a contact name in Messages who is way below the list, the search will not yield any result.

BUG in iOS7: Post iOS7 upgrade, search option does not work for "Messages". If you want to search a contact name in Messages who is way below the list, the search will not yield any result.

These are user forums. You are not speaking to Apple here. Report your problem at Apple Feedback.

Your search did not produce any results

Hi,
I'm publishing my iWeb site to my ME.COM account.
I have the site password protected as offered in iWeb.
But when the site is password protected the search with the iWeb search field does not provide any results.
Only the message:
"Your search did not produce any results."
If I disable the password protection for the site in iWeb and republish, the search provides the expected results.
Any idea what's wrong?
Thanks and Regards,
JO

Sorry, didn't test enough.
After publishing a few new blog entries under the password protected site, I tested the search again and it does not return any results.
It was working for a short time when I republished unprotected and then again protected.
Now that I added block entries under the protected site mode, search is brogen, again.
Any Help?
Thanks and Regards,
JO

Google, Yahoo searches come back " Invalid Security Code" msgs?

Now when I do a Firefox Search (whether Google, Yahoo, etc), I get a "Invalid Security Code" / "Issuer Certificate is unknown" error message train. I can't understand why these sites would produce this result but am afraid to override the error message worrying about some kind of malware interference problem.

hello, a possible solution depends on different factors:
* what is the '''error code''' shown under ''technical details'' on the error page?
in case the error code equals ''sec_error_unknown_issuer'', please attempt to add an exception on the bottom of the error page (don't add it for real though) & inspect the certificate like shown in the screenshot
* which '''issuer information''' does the certificate contain?
please report back with this information. thank you!

Spatial Queries Not Always Producing Accurate Results

Hi,
Spatial queries are not always producing accurate results. Here are the issues. We would appreciate any clarification you could provide to resolve these issues.
1. When querying for points inside a polygon that is not an MBR (minimum bounded rectangle), some of the coordinates returned are not inside the polygon. It is as though the primary filter is working, but not the secondary filter when using sdo_relate. How can we validate that the spatial query using sdo_relate is using the secondary filter?
2. SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT returns true when validating geometries even though we find results that are invalid.
3. Illegal geodetic coordinates can be inserted into a table: latitude > 90.0, latitude < -90.0, longitude > 180.0 or longitude < -180.0.
4. Querying for coordinates outside the MBR for the world where illegal coordinates existed did NOT return any rows, yet there were coordinates of long, lat: 181,91.
The following are examples and information relating to the above-referenced points.
select * from USER_SDO_GEOM_METADATA
TABLE_NAME      COLUMN_NAME      DIMINFO(SDO_DIMNAME, SDO_LB, SDO_UB, SDO_TOLERANCE)      SRID
LASTKNOWNPOSITIONS      THE_GEOM SDO_DIM_ARRAY(SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('X', -180, 180, .05), SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('Y', -90, 90, .05))      8307
POSITIONS     THE_GEOM SDO_DIM_ARRAY(SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('X', -180, 180, .05), SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('Y', -90, 90, .05))      8307
Example 1: Query for coordinates inside NON-rectangular polygon includes points outside of polygon.
SELECT l.vesselid, l.latitude, l.longitude, TO_CHAR(l.observationtime,
'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') as obstime FROM lastknownpositions l where
SDO_RELATE(l.the_geom,SDO_GEOMETRY(2003, 8307, NULL,
SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 1003, 1),
SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-98.20268,18.05079,-57.30101,18.00705,-57.08229,
54.66061,-98.59638,32.87842,-98.20268,18.05079)),'mask=inside')='TRUE'
This query returns the following coordinates that are outside of the polygon:
vesselid : 1152 obstime : 2005-08-24 06:00:00 long : -82.1 lat : 45.3
vesselid : 3140 obstime : 2005-08-28 12:00:00 long : -80.6 lat : 44.6
vesselid : 1253 obstime : 2005-08-22 09:00:00 long : -80.0 lat : 45.3
Example 2a: Using SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT
Select areaid, the_geom,
SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT(the_geom, 0.005) from area where
areaid=24
ResultSet:
AREAID THE_GEOM(SDO_GTYPE, SDO_SRID, SDO_POINT(X, Y, Z), SDO_ELEM_INFO,
SDO_ORDINATES) SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT(THE_GEOM,0.005)
24 SDO_GEOMETRY(2003, 8307, NULL, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 1003, 1), SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-98.20268, 18.05079, -57.30101, 18.00705, -57.08229, 54.66061, -98.59638, 32.87842, -98.20268, 18.05079)) TRUE
Example 2b: Using SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT
Select positionid, vesselid, the_geom,
SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT(the_geom, 0.005) from positions where vesselid=1152
ResultSet:
POSITIONID VESSELID THE_GEOM(SDO_GTYPE, SDO_SRID, SDO_POINT(X, Y, Z),
SDO_ELEM_INFO, SDO_ORDINATES) DO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT(THE_GEOM,0.005)
743811 1152 SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(-82.1, 45.3, NULL), NULL, NULL) TRUE
743812 1152 SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(-82.1, 45.3, NULL), NULL, NULL) TRUE
743813 1152 SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(-80.2, 42.5, NULL), NULL, NULL) TRUE
743814 1152 SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(-80.2, 42.5, NULL), NULL, NULL) TRUE
Example 3: Invalid Coordinate values found in POSITIONS table.
SELECT p.positionid, p.latitude, p.longitude, p.the_geom FROM positions p
WHERE p.latitude < -180.0
2 lines from ResultSet:
POSITIONID LATITUDE LONGITUDE THE_GEOM(SDO_GTYPE, SDO_SRID, SDO_POINT(X, Y, Z), SDO_ELEM_INFO, SDO_ORDINATES)
714915 -210.85408 -79.74449 SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(-79.74449, -210.85408, NULL), NULL, NULL)
714938 -211.13632 -79.951256 SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(-79.951256, -211.13632, NULL), NULL, NULL)
SELECT p.positionid, p.latitude, p.longitude, p.the_geom FROM positions p
WHERE p.longitude > 180.0
3 lines from ResultSet:
POSITIONID LATITUDE LONGITUDE THE_GEOM(SDO_GTYPE, SDO_SRID, SDO_POINT(X, Y, Z), SDO_ELEM_INFO, SDO_ORDINATES)
588434 91 181 SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(181, 91, NULL), NULL, NULL)
589493 91 181 SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(181, 91, NULL), NULL, NULL)
589494 91 181 SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(181, 91, NULL), NULL, NULL)
Example 4: Failure to locate illegal coordinates by querying for disjoint coordinates outside of MBR for the world:
SELECT p.vesselid, p.latitude, p.longitude, p.the_geom,
TO_CHAR(p.observationtime, 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') as obstime,
SDO_GEOM.RELATE(p.the_geom, 'determine',
SDO_GEOMETRY(2003, 8307, NULL,SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 1003, 1),
SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-180.0,-90.0,180.0,-90.0,180.0,90.0,
-180.0,90.0,-180.0,-90.0)), .005) relationship FROM positions p where
SDO_GEOM.RELATE(p.the_geom, 'disjoint', SDO_GEOMETRY(2003, 8307,
NULL,SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 1003, 1),
SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-180.0,-90.0,180.0,-90.0,180.0,90.0,-80.0,90.0,
-180.0,-90.0)),.005)='TRUE'
no rows selected
Carol Saah

Hi Carol,
1) I think the results are correct. Note in a geodetic coordinate system adjacent points in a linestring or polygon are connected via geodesics. You are probably applying planar thinking to an ellipsoidal problem! I don't have time to do the full analysis right now, but a first guess is that is what is happening.
2) The query window seems to be valid. I don't think this is a problem.
3) Oracle will let you insert most anything into a table. In the index, it probably wraps. If you validate, I think the validation routines will tell you is is illegal if you use the signature with diminfo, where the coordinate system bounds are included in the validation.
4) Your query window is not valid. Your data is not valid. As the previous reply stated, you need to have valid data. If you think in terms of a geodetic coordinate system, you will realize that -180.0,-90.0 and 180.0,-90.0 are really the same point. Also, Oracle has a rule that polygon geometries cannot be greater than half the surface of the Earth.
Hope this helps.

EMAIL SEARCHES FAIL EVERY TIME

Anything more than a trivial search where the sought results are already present on the page fails after a few seconds. It is as if the search times out - no partial results.
I know I have old emails in storage and I know I have search terms that will match - but always the search fails with nothing useful as diagnostic. This condition has been forever. It renders the search feature useless.

I also have problems using search. I access my email via Webmail, but the search capability is useless.
I can search on "Sent by" or "sent to", but trying to search "subject" or message content does not work.
This renders my email capability almost useless.
Can someone provide instructions on getting the searches of past emails to work?
Thanks,
DT

Getting rid of email searches in finder

I just searched for the term "Letter to JD" in finder... there are 3 files that match this criteria:
letter to jd
letter to jd 2
letter to jd 3
I had to search through about 200 email messages and a bunch of other crap files in order to actually find the three files that have an exact phrase match in the name of the file.
How do I get rid of these email searches, and how do I get finder to respect the fact that I'm often searching for the exact words I expect to appear in the file?

Make sure Mail & Messages is unchecked in the Spotlight preferences:
System Preferences > Spotlight > select the Search Results tab and uncheck Mail & Messages
Then force Spotlight to reindex:
Open Terminal (in Applications/Utilities) and copy/paste the command below, then hit return.
sudo mdutil -E /
Enter your password (you will not see it on the screen as you type it) then hit return. After you get the Indexing enabled message, type in exit and hit return. You can then close the window and quit Terminal. Spotlight will start reindexed your drive. This can take quite some time. You can check the progress by clicking the Spotlight icon (magnifying glass) on the right side of the menu bar or hitting Command+Spacebar.

Since updating to iOS 6.0.1, email app will not open and other problems.

Help! Since updating my phone to iOS 6.0.1, my email app will not open, my email/contacts/calendar settings will not open, my touchscreen is unresponsive, my battery is draining in two hours time, and my delete button only works one letter at a time (can't hold down to delete easily). I've done a soft reset and I've restored twice to no avail. This is a MAJOR problem! I'm not wanting to pay for the apple care since this may result in upgrading to the iPhone 5 (last option) and the closest apple store is an hour and a half from me.

This seems to be a common problem.
I am suffering too!
It would seem to be very shoddy from apple to allow such problems.
Not the first issue since upgrade to iOS 6.....think home button problems.
Has anybody got news of a fix?

How to create a custom search portlet that groups results by category

Hello,
Is it possible to create a custom search portlet whose search results are displayed on a page grouped by Category? Basically the results page should have Category heading followed by search results.
I realize this is not canned functionality but any ideas on how to accomplish this using PLSQL APIs is also welcome.
Thanks.

hi,
one workaround i could think of is using the CM views to search for content that belongs to a category and display it in a custom way.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/portal/html/plsqldoc/pldoc904/wwsbr_api_view.html
this only allows you to search for the meta-data available in the CM views but not the content of an item that is available when doing a search.
in the next major portal release we will have a publich search API that can be used for these type of requirements. you can execute your search and format the results in the way you want.
regards,
christian

Email search no longer works

With the latest change of the email layout, besides being more cumbersome to use, searching doesn't work anymore. It does not retrieve all the instances of the search term. I tried the from name and the actual from email address and only 1 instance was returned, when there were several of them in my inbox. I need to do this to clear out my email, as I do not use verizon email to read my emai, it is just too annoying. But I need to clear it out periodically as I don't have my email pgm delete them), and now that will take much more manual effort.
Plus it is ridiculous to put web search and email search together, it's too easy to click the web button instead of the mail button

Never mind - I figured it out. I still think the web button should be removed though.

RTFProcessor produces invalid XSL-FO in WebLogic

I've been writing an application that uses the RTProcessor class to process an rtf file into XML, which I can then parse to information about the report layout.
While developing on tomcat this worked fine. However for production we will be deploying on WebLogic. WebLogic seems to be using a different XML parser that is stricter than tomcats so when using the application the XML parser throws an error when parsing the XSL-FO.
The problem is that XSL-FO is not valid XML as it contains an invalid character on the line:
<xsl:variable name="_XDOXSLTCTX" select="xdoxslt:set_xslt_locale($_XDOCTX, $_XDOLOCALE, $_XDOTIMEZONE, $_XDOCALENDAR, concat($_XDODFOVERRIDE,'',$_XDOCURMASKS,'',$_XDONFSEPARATORS))"/>
So my first question is: Is there a way to stop this element from being generated in the XSL-FO? This seems to have been looked at in this thread but without much of a conclusion:
BI Publisher produces invalid XSL:FO stylesheet
My second question: I don't understand how Tomcat can parse the XML and WebLogic can't. I'm deploying the same code so I'd assumed it would be using the same parser. As a work around around is it possible to configure WebLogic to use the same parser as tomcat? The relevant code I'm using is posted below:
ByteArrayOutputStream templateOutputStream = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
               RTFProcessor rtfProcessor = new RTFProcessor(
                         new FileInputStream(template.getTemplateFile())
               rtfProcessor.setOutput(templateOutputStream);
               rtfProcessor.process();
               logger.debug(this.className + " - " + methodName +
                         ":#2 XSL-FO : " + templateOutputStream.toString());
               DocumentBuilderFactory dbf = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance();
               DocumentBuilder db = dbf.newDocumentBuilder();
               // parse using builder to get DOM representation of the XML file
               Document dom = db.parse(new ByteArrayInputStream(templateOutputStream.toByteArray()));
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Thanks for your reply, After debugging the application carefully in Tomcat and Weblogic it became apparent that weblogic was using it's preferred XML parsers when parsing my XML.
In Tomcat has a different order or precedence for its class loader so it was parsing my XML with the oracle.xml package, Weblogic was instead using its own weblogic.xml parser. So I had to set up a weblogic-application.xml file to control this.
If you're right that the XML is valid, then this looks like there is a bug in the weblogic parser. I'm not at work at the moment but if you want more details I can get you them next week.
Thanks.

How do I see email address (LearnerID) in Quiz Results Analyzer

Useing Captivate 5.5
Reporting Quiz results to a local server.
Q: How can I see the "LearnerID" (students email address) in the Captivate Quiz Results Analyzer?
When the student clicks on "Post Results" and enters their name and email address in the pop-up window the email address is collected. You can see the email address (LearnerID) in the resulting XML file that's saved in the CaptivateResults folder.
Problem is I can't see the email address in the Analyzer, and don't see an option to include it. How can I see the "LearnerID" or the students email address in the Captivate Quiz Results Analyzer? From here I want to export a CSV file.

Thanks for your response. The quiz results analyzer is awesome, but without the display of email addresses it is not a total solution.
I'm using an internal server and what I found out is that the .xml file that Captivate creates in the CaptivateResults folder (that Captivate also creates) contains the email addresses.
So, rather than use the analyzer, I will have to figure out the best way to view email addresses from the xml file. If anyone has a solution that you are happy with, please let me know.

Email search will produce invalid results.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for