Employee/Supervisor and position based hierarchy combination

Hi All,
Can Employee/Supervisor and position based approval hierarchy used in the same Business Group? If I have OU1 and OU2 belonging to BG1. Can OU1 use employee supervisor and OU2 use position based?
Please throw some light on this setup and limitations.
Regards,
Praveen

Setup-->Financial Options-->Human Resources tab -->Use Approval Hierarchies check box. If you check uses approval hierarchies based on positions if not uses the employee hierarchy (supervisor in employee).
Thanks
Nagamohan

Similar Messages

  • Navigation to find " Employee based hierarchy or Position Based Hierarchy "

    Hi Experts,
    Please let me know
    Navigation to find Employee based hierarchy or Position Based Hierarchy.
    regds
    MRR

    Setup-->Financial Options-->Human Resources tab -->Use Approval Hierarchies check box. If you check uses approval hierarchies based on positions if not uses the employee hierarchy (supervisor in employee).
    Thanks
    Nagamohan

  • Notification generation to the employee, supervisor and HR

    Hi,
    The requirement is like whenever an employee completes his Probation, or one year of service, the employee, supervisor and HR should get an email notification. How can I achieve this in SAP HCM?
    Regards,
    Sasi.

    1. You have to first maintain Date specification Infotype 0041 and Monitoring of task with a reminder date linked to mail server or pop up.Take help of technical (ABAPer ) help.
    2. You can use dynamic action to trigger mail. In table T558Z.
    For any changes irrespective of any field the system will shoot a mail hence in the column S (Indicator for Step) we have given M-Send a Mail. The mail will be controlled by a feature M0001.
    Here the Feature M0001 enables us to control to whom we will send a mail, the text of the mail we will send and the processing type used. The feature can be used for all Master Data Info types for both Transactions class A (employees) and B (Applicant).
    A mail has to be sent to the employee, to the administrators and the distribution list. So we need to create a text now. To create a text we need to go to SAP IMG.
    Path : SPROPersonnel management Personnel administration  Setting Up Mail Connection for info type changesCreate standard text  for mail connection.
    In the next page we need to mention a Text Name, Text Id  and the Language.
    The transaction for SAP Business Workplace is SO04. In the SAP Business Workplace we need to create a Distribution list. To create it we need to click on the distribution list.

  • IDM, GRC and position based security

    We use position based security in our ERP  system and are implementing GRC.  In our BI system the roles are directly assigned to the User ID, but we need them to dynamically update if a position change occurs.  We have this functionality working in QAS by implementing CUA, but we are considering if IDM can be used instead.  There seems to much less documentation on how to configure IDM with position based security (compared to CUA), so I have a few questions.
    Assuming IDM is receiving its provisioning requests from GRC, can it be configured to provision a role to the position on one system and a user on another?     
    How can IdM be configured to react to a position change and update the roles appropriately?
    Has anyone implemented GRC and IDM with position based security?
    Regards,
    Wayne

    Hi Wayne,
    In IdM, you can define business roles (for your positions) and map these to the technical roles that you can distribute to your SAP systems.
    You can configure IdM to react to changes in your HCM system and automatically create and distribute roles based upon e.g. the new job description of a user.
    I've attended Teched, and the SAP recommendation is to use IdM to manage your users and do the provisioning and to use GRC for compliance checking.
    So in HCM the position of a user changes (e.g. promotion), IdM picks this up and proposes a set of roles for the user, IdM sends this to GRC via web service, GRC checks for compliance (SOD) issues and if there are none, GRC tells IdM all is OK, then IdM starts the provisioning. If GRC reports issues, you should have a workflow in place to handle these.
    This is all theory though, I'm just getting started with IdM myself.
    Kind regards,
    Dagwin

  • Compliance Calibrator 5.2 and position based user role provisioning

    Hi
    We are having Position based security in place... I was just wondering if CC 5.2 can do SOD analysis in Position based secuirty also?

    Hi parveen,
    To do HR Risk analysis perform following steps:-
    To excute this scenario try to take help of HR Consultant.
    1-Go to SAP System>Execute PPSC transaction>create Position.
    2-Now execute PO13 transaction-->select that position assigned role ( Contains some risk violation) to that position.
    3- Now in CC ,go to informer tab> Risk analysis> HR Objects-->excute report with following key  parametrs
        i)System:-any sap system
        ii)Analysis Type :-Object security only
        iii) Object Type:Position
        iv)Rule Set: *
    Now you can perform risk analysis at position level.
    Regards,
    Jagat

  • Position Hierarchy - Employee Supervisor Change

    Hello,
    We have few of our Operating Units setup with Position Hierarchy Approval method for Purchasing documents. We want to change this to Employee-Supervisor Relationship due to change in some of the global policies.
    Would like to know what are the implications & what are the things to be taken care.
    Thanks,
    Shilpa

    You will find that emp. Supervisor hierarchy (ESH) is simpler to setup and understand. But it has less functionality.
    e.g. In PBH (position based hierarchy), you can submit PO's using different paths if necessary. But in ESH, the po always will go to the supervisor and his supervisor etc.
    To implement your change
    1) Go to the define employees screen (in the purchasing module if you use Shared HR or in the HRMS module if you use full HRMS). Enter the supervisor name for all employees that will submit /approve PO.
    2) Purchasing > setup > organizations > financial options > Human resources tab > uncheck "Use approval hierarchies" checkbox
    3) You can end-date existing hierarchies.
    4) You don't have to run Fill employee hierarchy program anymore.
    5) When a person leaves or there is a reorg, make sure you update the supervisor name for the employees.
    6) You need to continue to maintain approval groups and assignments as before.
    Hope this answers your question,
    Sandeep Gandhi

  • Structural Authorisation & Position Based Role Mapping ( Indirect Roles)

    Hi
    I have few queries on Structural Authorization & Position Based Role Mapping (Indirect Role Assignment).
    This is a public sector implementation. We are migrating from the traditional based (assigning roles to users) to Indirect role assignment.
    1. Can we integrate both structural authorizations and position based role mapping in one system?
    2. If we implement structural authorizations and position based role mapping in a single system, then do we need to assign the role to the chief position or it would automatically have the authorizations which are assigned to the users below chief position.
    3. First step do we need to create the users in SU01 / SU10 or can we create the entries in PA30. Which one comes first or both independent.
    4. If the user moves from one position to the another position then there would need to be a grace period of shift over of Roles. Where do we maintain the shift over value of days. Do we need to maintain in both.
    Any help or suggestions on the above would be appreciated.
    Thanks and Regards
    Arun R

    Hi
    1. Can we integrate both structural authorizations and position based role mapping in one system?
    Yes you can.  Structural authorisations and position based role mapping can be assigned to the same org plan in SAP.
    2. If we implement structural authorizations and position based role mapping in a single system, then do we need to assign the role to the chief position or it would automatically have the authorizations which are assigned to the users below chief position.
    No, the SAP role is unique to the postion it is assigned to. But remember not all employees will be assigned to a position - in this case you have to assign the sap role directly to the user in SU01/SU01
    3. First step do we need to create the users in SU01 / SU10 or can we create the entries in PA30. Which one comes first or both independent.
    Create user in SU01.SU10 first before creating infotype 105 in PA30.
    4. If the user moves from one position to the another position then there would need to be a grace period of shift over of Roles. Where do we maintain the shift over value of days. Do we need to maintain in both.
    *When a users assignment in the org structure changes then you must run RHRPROFL0 to update the user assignment to the new position.   
    Also the number of days an employee can have access to their previous data is controlled by the parameter is called ADAYS - tx OOAC .  SAP currently defaults this to 15 days and this is used  to control the number of days that the employee can still access the data they created even though they are assigned to a different organisation with different authorisations.
    Hope this helps.
    Charmaine

  • HR Report shows Employee & Supervisor details

    Hi All,
    I have requirement were I have to display list of employees personal and position data along with his supervisor position data (like job class, class title) and also few personal data (like work phone).
    Currently we have only the Personnel Actions and Headcount cube. How to display employee and its supervisor detail.
    Do I need to create another data target to store employee and supervisor relationship?
    Regards,
    Anand

    HI,
    I think there is no need to create supervisor data target.
    Supervisor for any employee will be another employee so we have to maintain the data for the supervisor.
    or we can onclude another field in the target where we can maintain this information.
    Another appoach:
    We can create supervisor master data  infoobject where we can main tain data for supervisor and all the attributes of supervisor can be used in the reports.
    You can follow any one of the above appoach.
    Hope this will help you..
    Thanks,
    Jitendra

  • AWM 10.2.0.1 - I can not choosing Value Based hierarchy

    I have Oracle client 10.2.0.1 software with AWM 10.2.0.1 . I want to build a dimension with value-based hierarchy . In AWM I have hierarchy editor with the two radio buttons for choosing type of hierachy : Level Based hierarchy and Value Based hierarchy . But the secod one (Value Based hierarchy) is disabled - I can not choosing this type of hierarchy . Why this?
    Thanks in advance,
    Aurel

    Hi there,
    I really would not recommend that you work with the 10.2.0.1 version of AWM. This version is fairly old now and there have been a number of important bug fixes added to more recent releases.
    What version of the Oracle database are you running? And on what operating system?
    I suggest that you consult the following link and ensure that you are working with the versions of BOTH database and AWM that are recommended by Oracle:
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/bi/olap/collateral/olap_certification.html
    Thanks
    Stuart

  • Position based approvals Vs Employee/Supervisor based Approvals

    Has anyone used Employee/Supervisor relationship for approving documents in Self Service Purchasing (SSP). The Oracle Education document of SSP states that a position is required for every user to route documents.
    Any thoughts, experiences would be appreciated.
    We are implementing SSP 4.0 on 10.7 Apps.
    Thanks
    Chandra

    Has anyone used Employee/Supervisor relationship for approving documents in Self Service Purchasing (SSP). The Oracle Education document of SSP states that a position is required for every user to route documents.
    Any thoughts, experiences would be appreciated.
    We are implementing SSP 4.0 on 10.7 Apps.
    Thanks
    Chandra

  • Use of filters and aggregations based on hierarchy nodes in an update rule

    Hello,
    I need to calculate some indicators from a ODS (BW 3.5) that contain raw data to another one that will contain indicators. These figures are the results of the use of filters and aggregations based on hierarchy nodes (for example: all sales accounts under a node).
    In fact, this is typically a query but I want to store these figures, so I need
    I understood I have to use a start routine. I never did that before.
    Could you provide me with easy-to-understand-for-newbies examples of:
    - filtering data based on the value of an infoobject (value must be empty, for example)
    - filtering and aggregation of data based on the appartenance to hierarchy nodes (all sales figures, ....)
    - aggregation of the key figures based on different characteristics after filtering of these
    Well, I am asking a lot ...
    Thank you very much
    Thomas

    Please go through the following link to learn more on aggregates:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e55aaca6-0301-0010-928e-af44060bda32
    Also go through the very detailed documentation:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/67efb9bb-0601-0010-f7a2-b582e94bcf8a
    Regards,
    Mahesh

  • Value-based hierarchy on ROLAP dimension. Is this possible and how?

    Value-based hierarchy on ROLAP dimension. Is this possible and how?
    If yes, what tool I have to use. Any simple examples?

    Based on my experience of OWB10gR2 the option to create a "Value Based" hierarchy is only enabled if you create an AW based OLAP model. If you want to create a ROLAP model then I do not think this is possible.
    Question is why create a ROLAP model when you could get better performance and more powerful analytical features by using a multidimensional model within an analytic workspace.
    Keith

  • Can we frame a VO which is a combination of EO based VO and SQL based VO?

    Is it possible to create a VO which is a combination of EO based VO and SQL based VO? Is the resultant VO capable of inserting data in the database?

    Fortunately, this is such a common use case that it's documented how to do this:
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26098_01/web.1112/e16182/bcquerying.htm#CEGEGHFB
    and
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26098_01/web.1112/e16182/bcquerying.htm#CHDHBDDE
    are the two sections you need to read.
    You don't need a "combination" VO, and in both cases, the base EO of the VO is updatable/insertable
    Note: This is why the best course is to state your use case (problem) - not failed or attempted solutions - when posting questions on OTN.

  • MSS Substitution - Position Based and Change Fields

    Hi Experts,
    We are on EHP7 and using NWBC (POWL) for work item. We have set-up position based substitution. But when the user logs in, he/she don't see work item of other user. We have set-up A210 relationships between positions. Do we need to set-up anything else?
    Second Question,
    On MSS when we set-up substitution, it shows Assignee -  PERNR not User Name. How can we change the fields to show User Name instead of PERNR?
    Regards,
    Ashish

    We would like to see User Name instead of User IDs as Manager may not remember person with User IDs. In this scenario, substitution created from Manage Substitution Rules (Create Rules). In Assignee field it shows User ID and we would like to see User Name.
    Regards,
    Ashish

  • Restrict employee postion to current based on Org Unit

    Hi,
    We have recently implemented structural Authorization and I am now trying to create a query based on Org Unit.
    The query is to show employee by position based on org unit. I have made org unit auth relevant and created a hierarchy variable as the restriction. In the row/columns I have included Org unit with hierarchy activated, position and employee. The KF is Actual time.
    When I execute the report it is bringing leavers and people in old positions. To remove leavers I included a restriction on person to remove anyone in the position 99999999.
    But this is still showing people in old postions. These positions have been end dated in the system and current positions have date 31/12/9999.
    Does anyone know how I can restrict position to only show current positions?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    as suggested i have made the query time dependant be selecting "key date" in the proerties, but this still brings in postions that have been end dated.
    Is there a way to restrict postions by validity. The query is based on time management info cube
    thanks

Maybe you are looking for