Restrict employee postion to current based on Org Unit

Hi,
We have recently implemented structural Authorization and I am now trying to create a query based on Org Unit.
The query is to show employee by position based on org unit. I have made org unit auth relevant and created a hierarchy variable as the restriction. In the row/columns I have included Org unit with hierarchy activated, position and employee. The KF is Actual time.
When I execute the report it is bringing leavers and people in old positions. To remove leavers I included a restriction on person to remove anyone in the position 99999999.
But this is still showing people in old postions. These positions have been end dated in the system and current positions have date 31/12/9999.
Does anyone know how I can restrict position to only show current positions?
Thanks

Hi,
as suggested i have made the query time dependant be selecting "key date" in the proerties, but this still brings in postions that have been end dated.
Is there a way to restrict postions by validity. The query is based on time management info cube
thanks

Similar Messages

How to total No. of employees based on Org unit as well as Job ID in ALV

Hi ,
I need to subtotal no. of employees in an org unit and also another subtotal for employees under same job ids using ALV Grid display.
Regards,
Sarika.

Hi Sarika,
Create an additional column in your output for integer field and populate the same with value 1 fro each row.
Then, SORT the internal table by Org. Unit and Job and perform sum operation on the column for integer field.
You can SORT by adding fields to the IT_SORT parameter in REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY and mark the DO_SUM in the new integer column fieldcatalog entry.
Cheers,
Aditya
Edited by: Aditya Laud on Feb 14, 2008 2:25 AM

HR report/tranzaction on current and past org unit, position, job

Hi,
Does anyone know the code of the standard report / tranzaction to show the current and the past org unit, position and job for an employee?
Thank you
Adriana

Hi Adriana!
Please try using Headcount Changes report S_L9C_94000095.
Regards!
Woody.

Employee determination on the basis of Org.Unit

Hi expert,
I'd like to retrieve the employee responsible for a task from the organizational unit:
In the business scenario i've a person that, for each org unit, is in charge to fulfill this task; the expected behaviour would be that while creating a task, the employee responsible is automatically filled with the person, that for the identified org unit, is responsible.
I've set the access sequence "0009: organizational data employee for an organizational unit." in correspondence of the partner function Employee responsible; Now i don't know how to link that person to the org unit. Do i have to use position before?
Regards
C

Carmine,
You would need to create a new access sequences based on organizational data. Then you would also need to use a organizational data determination rule to determine which org unit/position should be used in the sequence.
If this can't work, then you need to implement the partner determination BADI (COM_PARTNER_BADI) to build your source determination logic so that it meets your needs.
Good luck,
Stephen

How to group employees together belonging to a particular org. unit togethe

Hi,
I am developing a report. In that report after retrieving the relevant data(Employees belonging to a particular org. unit together irrespective of position say employee, chief etc.) it is required to display the output in a such a manner that all employees belonging to a particular org. unit will be grouped together.
Which one would be a better grouping criteria?
1. Grouping by personnel area(P0001-WERKS)
2. Grouping by org. unit(P0001-ORGEH)
What is the impact of both of them?
In case if there is a grouping criteria other than both mentioned above, then please guide me for the same.
The objective of the report is to show the result in the form of employees belonging to a particular department together irrespective of their position in the department.
Thanks,

Cost Center Can be inherited Via
OU - Current or Any OU above inthe Hierarchy
Position Hierarchy
IT - Account Assignment for OU or Position
Or IT-27 directly..
Ensure Cost center ref is removed from all these sources if you dont want a Cost Center.

How to Restrict Creation of Infotype Record for Certain Org Units?

Dear All,
Requirement:
Org Unit 1 does not have overtime. Even the employee works overtime, they will not get overtime compensation.
One of the option is to disallow the creation of IT2005's record for all the employees in Org Unit 1.
Is it possible to do this through standard SAP?
Thanks a lot.

Hi,
The best way to control this will be with Authorizations so that people belonging to one Org.unit should not have IT2005 mantainence.
Let me know if u have any concerns on this.
Thanks
Swati

CATS - How to enter times of an employee who works for 2 different Org Unit

Hi,
I am able to successfully enter times for an employee and do the approval process (CAT4) and CAT6 and I can see the records getting updated in PA30.
Scenario :
Employee works for 2 different Org Units and should be able to enter his time through Timesheet. Eg: Employee A spends 6 Hours working in Department B1 & 3 Hours in Dept B2.
The Manager of B1 should only be able to approve 6 Hours of Employee A
The Manager of B2 should only be able to approve 6 Hours of Employee A
Can somebody help me out how this can be achieved?
Regards,
Mamta

Hi Sameer,
Thank you for the response. Yes, when I report the times for 2 different org units I would also want the cost for that employee distributed between org units.
I tried your solution-> by entering times in CAT2 for Employee A for 2 different Cost Centers that I created.
For Department B1 --> In CAT2 I entered Cost center C1 : 6 Hours
For Department B2 -->In CAT2 I entered Cost center C2 : 4 Hours
When I go to CAT4 and try to select the employee for approval and search the employee-A Org unit wise he is displayed only in his original Department -> B1 with 10 hours (6+4). What else do you think needs to be done?
Is this anything to be done with Sender Receiver Cost Centers because the cost center C1,C2 that I created for Org Units B1 & B2 respectively are just Cost Centers. I dont know the difference between Costcenter and Sender Costcenter/Receiver Costcenter.
I will try to explain the scenario again in case I was not clear :
u2022Each employee has their home OU. However these employees may be working with multiple OU each day or the week. So potentially, the time sheet may have to be approved by multiple managers.
Regards,
Mamta

Need option to count the no. of pernrs based on org unit in ALV Grid Format

Hi ,
Do we have any option to count the no. of pernrs in an org. unit to be printed with subtotals in the pernrs column itself.
Do we have any option for counter in SLIS itself.
Thanks in advance,
Sarika

Hi Sarika,
Create an additional column in your output for integer field and populate the same with value 1 fro each row.
Then, SORT the internal table by Org. Unit and Job and perform sum operation on the column for integer field.
You can SORT by adding fields to the IT_SORT parameter in REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY and mark the DO_SUM in the new integer column fieldcatalog entry.
Cheers,
Aditya
Edited by: Aditya Laud on Feb 14, 2008 2:25 AM

Fetching employees under org. units.

Hi all,
I have to obtain a list of employees which come under a selected org. unit. This org. unit could be a main org. unit which contains subordinate org. units under which an employee resides. Can anyone tell me how to do this.
regards,
Hamza

Hello,
This FM will be helpful for you. If you want to get the list of all the employees based on the Organizational Path. You need to know the evaluation path though.
Thanks,
Jayant

OM - Restricted count of Positions in an Org Unit

Can we Restrict the count of Relationship B003 records in One particular date for One Org Unit through Customization ...
Can Restrict No of Positions related to One Org Unit in oone particular Time period through Config..
How is it Done ??
Pls. Help
Edited by: rakshita sahai on Feb 14, 2009 12:49 PM

Hi,
There is no way you can restrict the users in creating no of positions.
Better to have approval process for the positions to be created.Which might restrict the users.
As the objects have different statuses planned,approved,active..etc..
Regards,
Nachy

Report to the employee list under an org unit for a specific PSA

Hello Experts,
Is there any standard report to see the list of employees belonging to a particular sub org unit under a particular personnel sub area?
For eg: There is a company X, and it has got 3 plants in blore, mumbai and chennai.
Blore , chennai amd mumbai represent the personnel sub area for the company X.
to see the list of employees working under operational sub org unit , under the org unit of company X in blore, is there any standard report in SAP??
Helpful answers will be awarded
thanks and regards,
Pooja Dev

Hi Pooja,
Use Report RPLMIT00.
Choose Org structure on it.
Let me know.
Arti

BP - Employee relationships to an org unit and changes

Dear Colleagues of CRM,
The scenario pertains to an employee and its relationship to an org unit to which it is assigned. Once an employee is assigned to an org unit, a relationship too gets created with the Employee as BP. This relationship has the contact info that was available in the BP master data at that point of time.
Later on, if the employee is transferred and hence assigned to another org unit, the assignment in the org unit is changed to the new org unit. On the new org unit assignment, a new relationship gets created with the BP. However, the earlier relationship doesn't get deleted when the earlier assignment to the org unit was deleted. If I attempt to delete the relationship in the BP, it doesn't allow and prompts to u201Cu2026.Change through the HR mastersu201D. The HR master though has nothing of the contact details vis-à-vis this relationship.
The existence of this initial relationship is causing error in all my dependent programs / activities which pick up the contact details of this employee and hence trigger emails etc.
Request solution as to how do I remove this u2018oldu2019 and irrelevant relationship from the BP. It may be noted that the subsequent changes of assignment u2013 deletions in particular u2013 are deleting the relationship too but the initial one exists all throughout.
Seek your kind advise to resolve the matter .
Regards,
Tariq

Contact SAP they have given two custom reports to check and repair BUT050 entries when we have similar issue.
Regards,
Rajesh.

Employee change Org Unit

Is it possible to change an employee that was assigned to an Org Unit through migration?
Organizational Management | Org Structures | End Employment Assignment is greyed out.

Hi Michael,
The end employment is grayed out in the WoC Org Management Edit Screen Employee Tab, if HCM is scoped and the employee is an internal employee and not a service agent.
If HCM is not scoped or if it is a service agent you can do do the transfer in WoC OrgManagement . However do not forget to activate the org unit you transfered the employee to.
If HCM is not scoped there is also the lean employee UI for hiring, transfers, terminations, etc.
Raviprasad nicely described what to do with internal employees in HCM.
Just a remark on the manager. If there is amanger assigned to the org unit where they are transfered, this will be the new manager of the employee.
Best regards
Frank

Chief Position Top Org Unit

Good Morning All.
We are having a problem with regards to the details that our Chief Exec can see within MSS. At the moment she can see all the details with regards to ESS and the inbox, however MSS does not seam to show any details. I have moved the position into another org unit and everything works fine, and have put my self in the top position and I get the same errors. We have created a new position and changed the user roles, how ever this does not make any difference.
Any Ideas?

Hi Jason
How many direct subordinate employees are we talking about? Unless your CEX is the direct manager of several thousand employees, you probably shouldn't have a difficult time.
So if you don't have a role issue, then do you think it's possible one or more of the subordinate employees has data issues? Would you be willing to remove subordinate employees(by moving them to other org units)/org units to see if that isolates a situation where it runs faster?
Is this the only piece of MSS where this extended wait is being experienced for this particular user?
Thanks,
Chris

Terminate or Retire Action - Default 00000000 job and org unit

As of now, our system is set up that if there is a termination or retire action, 99999999 is defaulted into the position. The org unit and job ids are left as is.
II noticed when running program RHINTE30 that the program proposed changing all org unit and job ids to 00000000 on IT0001 that corresponded to an infotype 0001 record that has a 99999999 position id due to a termination or retire action.
So, is standard SAP set-up to to have 0000000 in the job and org unit id field on infotype 0001 when the person is no longer in a position (position = 99999999)? Is that what is best practice? If so, why? The concern about changing the org unit and job id to 00000000 for a terminated or retired employee has to do with if we are using the 9999/12/31 end date on infotype 0001 to look up an employee's most recent job or org unit information even if the employee has terminated or retired. How would we do this if the job and org unit ids are 00000000s?

Have u run the RHINTE programmes properly ?
are u able to save the record?
As some times it may be display probolem, if u r able to save the record then check the relationship in pp10/po13.
and U have not answered what Mr. Valeri is asking about your Implementation/support because these type we come accress if data is not uploaded properly.
Regards
vinmax

Restrict employee postion to current based on Org Unit

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for