Position Hierarchy - Employee Supervisor Change

Hello,
We have few of our Operating Units setup with Position Hierarchy Approval method for Purchasing documents. We want to change this to Employee-Supervisor Relationship due to change in some of the global policies.
Would like to know what are the implications & what are the things to be taken care.
Thanks,
Shilpa

You will find that emp. Supervisor hierarchy (ESH) is simpler to setup and understand. But it has less functionality.
e.g. In PBH (position based hierarchy), you can submit PO's using different paths if necessary. But in ESH, the po always will go to the supervisor and his supervisor etc.
To implement your change
1) Go to the define employees screen (in the purchasing module if you use Shared HR or in the HRMS module if you use full HRMS). Enter the supervisor name for all employees that will submit /approve PO.
2) Purchasing > setup > organizations > financial options > Human resources tab > uncheck "Use approval hierarchies" checkbox
3) You can end-date existing hierarchies.
4) You don't have to run Fill employee hierarchy program anymore.
5) When a person leaves or there is a reorg, make sure you update the supervisor name for the employees.
6) You need to continue to maintain approval groups and assignments as before.
Hope this answers your question,
Sandeep Gandhi

Similar Messages

  • HRMS - Employee Supervisor Change

    Hi Guys,
    I wonder if you can help in 11.5.10.2 when changing a supervisor for an employee is there any concurrent job that should be run after this change so that workflows now go to the new supervisor? Its seems that when this change is made some workflow are still erroring with message "no performer found". I thought once we made a change to a supervisor oracle would do the rest ?
    Any help would be great.
    Bal

    I got it.
    Thanks.

  • Employee/Supervisor and position based hierarchy combination

    Hi All,
    Can Employee/Supervisor and position based approval hierarchy used in the same Business Group? If I have OU1 and OU2 belonging to BG1. Can OU1 use employee supervisor and OU2 use position based?
    Please throw some light on this setup and limitations.
    Regards,
    Praveen

    Setup-->Financial Options-->Human Resources tab -->Use Approval Hierarchies check box. If you check uses approval hierarchies based on positions if not uses the employee hierarchy (supervisor in employee).
    Thanks
    Nagamohan

  • Position based approvals Vs Employee/Supervisor based Approvals

    Has anyone used Employee/Supervisor relationship for approving documents in Self Service Purchasing (SSP). The Oracle Education document of SSP states that a position is required for every user to route documents.
    Any thoughts, experiences would be appreciated.
    We are implementing SSP 4.0 on 10.7 Apps.
    Thanks
    Chandra

    Has anyone used Employee/Supervisor relationship for approving documents in Self Service Purchasing (SSP). The Oracle Education document of SSP states that a position is required for every user to route documents.
    Any thoughts, experiences would be appreciated.
    We are implementing SSP 4.0 on 10.7 Apps.
    Thanks
    Chandra

  • Differences between Position Hierarchy and Supervisory Hierarchy

    Hi All,
    Can somebody tell me the pros and cons of using Position Hierarchy and Supervisory Hierrarchy .
    Regards,

    If you use the Position hierarchy then you will have to go through the process of defining all of the positions / posts in your organisation and specifying all reporting lines in your organisation from top to bottom. You will then have the overhead of maintaining your positions and position hierarchy and keeping them in line with the business on a day to day basis.
    If your organisation is fairly fluid, e.g. a project based organisation or an expanding organisation, these can be very significant overheads. Business re-organisation will create a large workload in creating new positions and migrating employees to them.
    If you are in a fairly static organisation e.g. public sector then it may well be that the position structure is well documented and changes infrequently. In this case use of positions and position hierarchies is a simple data entry task and adds significant value.
    The supervisor hierarchy is more flexible. It is simply a field held against the person record. However, there is very little validation on it so the you have to put manual processes in place to make sure the data is valid e.g. leavers are replaced and that no loops are created.
    I would recommend NOT using positions unless yours is a public sector implementation.
    Regards,
    Andrew

  • (urgent) Position Hierarchy and PO approval...

    Hi,
    We have re-engineered the current Position and Job Flexfield set-up, basically an additional segment in the Position FF and hiding a segment in Job FF. Adn the employee will be assigned to a one level high in the organization. So basically, employee will be assigned to a new org as well.
    Due to the changes, all employees will be moved to a new position. Now since client is utilizing the Position Hierarchy, I would like to know if we
    need to approved all the outstanding PO that requires approval, before moving the employees to the new assignment?
    If we dont do that, will there be any implications or will it cause any problems moving forward.
    Another question is, is it necessary to approved all the PO before changing all the employee assignment???
    Your response will be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks..

    PO Approval workflow is highly sensitive to changes while workflows are in progress. Remember workflow is versioned, so if you make changes to the workflow itself, then in progress workflows will still execute using the workflow definition at the time it started. Changing the user name is one no-no while that user has a PO Approval related to them in progress.
    However saying that, its tough to answer your question without knowing more detail of the changes. If the original approval related data structures remain in place and you haven't changed the workflow definition, then the in process workflows may be okay to complete assuming the new positions the employees are moved to still allow the "Find Approver" function to execute correctly... not sure about the organization part...
    As always, try it out in your test environment!
    Regards,
    Gareth

  • APPROVALS IN POSITION HIERARCHY IN HRSS

    Buddies,
    Assume:
    A and B are the two managers having same designations (Manager purchase)
    C and D are the two employee have same designation (purchase supervisor)
    Purchase supervisor are reporting to purchase manager.
    We are using positon hierarchy for approvals in HRSS
    leave of absence requests generated by C and D will go to only manager or will be going to both manager. What will be the approval process when their are more than one persons at same desigation.
    Please help

    You can create approval group as you want. But looks like even though you are using Position Hierarchy positions are not single incumbent. So if you send approval to position id or person occupying the position that would not be correct. So I think you may have to use supervisor hierarchy as well in this case to send the approval to the appropriate person.
    Let us know the detailed requirements.

  • Query regarding the Position Hierarchy.

    Client Version:R12.1.3
    We are setting up Position Hierarchy.
    Have a query in the setup.
    We have a position called Clerk--Number of Holders---2
    Clerk --Holder 1 is reporting to Manager 1
    Clerk Holder2 is reporting to Manager 2.
    When we are trying to set the Hierarchy.
    It is taking both the holders in consideration.
    Request to assist.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Srini

    914612 wrote:
    Dear user13056460,
    your query is very obvious you have a position type pooled and two employees are assigned to this position where in the hierarchy it shows two holder, if you want my opinion let each clerk have his own unique position as Clerk LA and CLerk DC by this you will not go through the headache of having two hierarchies and if youre having two hierarchies you need also to enable the document type (can change approval path option) the workflow engine by your scenario will get lost because two individuals have the same position so it will go to only one, options youre having
    1- let the postion with a two holder but enable the users to select approval path and employee while submiting PO's
    2- give each clerk a unique position name which is easier.
    Let me know if you have any more inquiries
    Regards
    Ammar M. GhazalehAmmar,
    That is what we have the requirment..
    I tried changing the existing hierarchy..but it is not working..
    For 2 clerks here..we created say 100.Purchase Clerk as Job and position as 200.Purchase clerk
    for the second clerk it has same job as 100.Purchase Clerk as Job and position as 200.Purchase clerk1
    (we changed a bit)
    one clerk reports to one manager..and the manager reports to dept head.
    one clerk reports to dept head..
    so while in hierarchy dept has total 3 sub ordinates and when we drill down manager has 1 sub ordinates..
    which makes sense...
    i created approval groups also...and assignments too..
    but when the newly created clerk logins and when he forwards documents..he is not seeing the default heiarchy..we have set this up in documents types..
    and the second old clerk he is seeing this when he is forwading documents for approval..
    where did i miss the setup?
    Please Advise
    Thanks
    Mahendra
    Edited by: 843237 on Feb 16, 2012 4:24 PM

  • Position Hierarchy Vs Organization Hierarchy

    Hi
    Our organization is position driven organization. I want to know what are the main advantages and disadvantages for Position Hierarchy and Organization Hierarchy.
    Because on top the hierarchies we will create security profiles.
    Can I have any document where I can find the comparison between both of these hierarchies.
    Thanks
    Gaurav

    No, the supervisor hierarchy is constructed simply by specifying supervisors on assignments.
    Added complexity can be added to the supervisor hierarchy in a multi assignment environment; you can then specify a 'supevisory assignment' as well but that is rare.
    It sounds like you will be invariable be drawn into using Positions. Having a 1-1 relationship between positions and employees is not unusual but be warned it can be extremely time consuming to maintain. I have been to organizations where position maintenance is virtually a full time job for a member of staff.
    If you are using Appraisals, definitely make use of the supervisor hierarchy, it is hard enough to implement correctly as it is without making it harder and trying to use the position hierarchy.
    You should be able to use the supervisor hierarchy for the OTL and iRec approval processes too but I'm happy to defer to other experts on the forum for those.

  • Images not appearing in Nakisa Org Hierarchy or Position Hierarchy

    Hi,
    I have configured Nakisa Org Structure to show photos of a few employees. The photos have been saved in the images/Portraits folder and are of the same size as the rest of the photos in this area. I have also pointed Nakisa Images to this folder in the Application wide setting. Also, I have used the Details Designer in OrgChart--> Position and edited the Images section to point to EmpDetails2 --> Personnel Number. I have also ensured that the photos have been saved as Personnel Number.jpg. Also, in the Position Hierarchy, I have done a similar mapping.
    However, the photos are still not appearing despite having published the Org Chart several times.
    I would really aprpeciate a quick response from you.
    Thanks,
    Vibhu

    Hi Vibhu,
    Have you checked the XSL files that control the images? I believe they are EmployeePictureXSL.xsl and EmployeePictureCondensedXSL.xsl. You might need to amend them to fit your solution.
    I hope that helps.
    Luke

  • HR Data Synchronization (Org Unit, Position and Employee) to SRM

    Hi All Expert,
    Currently, I had replicate the HR data (Org Unit, Position and Employee) to SRM thru transaction PFAL.
    Each time there is a new position or new employee, I have to run PFAL and run manually by include the new position number or new employee into the program to replicate to SRM.
    Does SAP have any specifiy program or step which I have follow to allow such automation? Is there any variant that I could set?
    How to trigger the new Org units which are created in HR to replicate to SRM without any manual input into selection field of Object ID during running the PFAL?
    We are trying to achieve automation of synchronization between changes/new  creation in HR to replicate to SRM.
    Thank for your help.
    Paul

    Hello Paul,
    Below notes will surely help you..
    1.The composite note for the process is 390380 - HR/ALE distribution in EBP/SRM.
    2.The initial description of the process can be found in note 312090 - Integration HR -
    EBP/SRM.
    Thanks & Regards
    Arshad

  • Position Hierarchy Based on secondary assignments.

    Hi,
    We have created a position hierarchy. While defining the hierarchy, for a position, which is secondary assignment for a person, is visible.
    However, when we create PO and forward to, the person whose secondary position is in hierarchy, is not coming in forward to list.
    If we include primary assignment position in hierarchy, than the person is available in the forward to list.
    Is there any sort of security of data working behind?
    Abdul Wahid
    http://iwidi.org

    I understand, what you are looking forward is an Enhancement request
    Have a look at the below ER
    1351979: APPROVAL WORKFLOW TO ALLOW SECONDARY ASSIGNMENT IN POSITION HIERARCHY
    Purchasing only uses the primary assignments for the purchasing functions.
    To use the Position Hierarchy, it must be setup on the employee's primary
    assignment.

  • Position hierarchy behavior

    Hi,
    We have a problem with position hierarchy in OBIA we note that SIL related make only INSERT operation instead of UPDATE, our source system is Siebel financial services and when we make a change in Siebel we don’t get that this change is reflected in OBI. Somebody knows something about this behavior?
    Regards
    Carlos

    Hi,
    The only way i can think of is having an custom workflow for the Budget approvals. After creating the workflow lets say 'XYZ', you need to start the workflow 'XYZ' instead of 'PABUDWF'(the standard one) in the pa_client_extn_budget_wf (budget workflow client extension) package,procedure start_budget_wf.
    Hope this helps !
    Thanks,
    Sathish
    www.projectsaccounting.com

  • Query on Position Hierarchy

    Hi,
    How can we change top position in position hierarchy?
    It's grayed out..we need to change the top position holder
    Also we observed as when we query all the position hierarchies we see the same position name and holder at the top
    Please Advise
    Mahendra

    Prakash Kumar wrote:
    Hi Mahendra,
    For that first check that in all those position hierarchies, what is the top position. Once you get that, pleas let me know whether they are same or they are different. If they are same, it answers your query.
    While creating a new hierarchy, you need to define the hierarchy first and then save it. Then go to the lower block and select the top position (whatever you have got from the client) and save. Then you will get the option of going down with "Down Arrow" type key. There you have to select the sub-ordinate position and save. Like this you have define/attach all the position till the lowest of the hierarchy.
    There is another option of copying (and applying) the existing hierarchy to the new position hierarchy defined by you and then it can be modified as per your need.
    Thanks & Regards
    Prakash KumarThanks Prakash
    I am seeing same holder in all hierarchies..Now this is holder i need to change...as he is no longer with the client..
    I have done the same way as you said...
    First say i created one postion hierarchy name in postion hierarchy...and just save it...closed it..
    when i reopen or query the new position hierarchy...i see the same top position which i told you earlier is been defaulted...don't know from where purchasing is pulling it..hope you got my issue now...
    Now how and where it is been defaulted as the top position...
    only way is to end date that postion??
    Thanks
    Mahendra

  • Supervisor Change.Pls help

    I have a employee table
    person_id employee_number full_name supervisor_name start_date end_date
    1           100               Cob     Don             01-JAN-2000   31-DEC-2000
    1           100               Cobb    Don             01-JAN-2001   30-JUN-2001
    1           100               Cobb     Smith           01-JUL-2001   31-DEC-2001person_id start_date and end_date is composite primary key
    I need a output where employee's supervisor changed between two dates
    employee_number full_name old_supervisor_name  new_supervisor_name
    100               cobb          Don                  SmithPlease let me know if i am not clear

    Try this:
    WITH employee AS
    (SELECT 1 person_id, 100 employee_number, 'Cobb' full_name, 'Don' supervisor_name, TO_DATE('01-JAN-2000') start_date, TO_DATE('31-DEC-2000') end_date FROM dual UNION ALL
    SELECT 1 person_id, 100 employee_number, 'Cobb' full_name, 'Don' supervisor_name, TO_DATE('01-JAN-2001') start_date, TO_DATE('30-JUN-2001') end_date FROM dual UNION ALL
    SELECT 1 person_id, 100 employee_number, 'Cobb' full_name, 'Smith' supervisor_name, TO_DATE('01-JUL-2001') start_date, TO_DATE('31-DEC-2001') end_date FROM dual UNION ALL
    SELECT 2 person_id, 110 employee_number, 'Jones' full_name, 'Mark' supervisor_name, TO_DATE('01-JAN-2000') start_date, TO_DATE('31-DEC-2001') end_date FROM dual)
    SELECT employee_number,
           full_name,
           supervisor_name,
           new_supervisor_name
    FROM  (SELECT employee_number,
                  full_name,
                  supervisor_name,
                  LEAD(supervisor_name) OVER (PARTITION BY employee_number ORDER BY employee_number, start_date) new_supervisor_name
           FROM   employee)
    WHERE  supervisor_name != NVL(new_supervisor_name, supervisor_name)

Maybe you are looking for

  • EasyMock 1.2 - working with static methods

    Hi, I'm working in an application which was written in java1.4. So we are using EasyMock 1.2 version since higher versions doesn't support java 1.4. I need to expect and return an array for a static method which is in a Util class (No interfaces invo

  • HT203206 iTunes install issue

    I had to uninstall iTunes from my computer recently but now I cannot re-install it. I deleted all Apple software from my PC. (I'm running Windows 7) and I downloaded the new version (12.1) and then I select to 'Run as an administrator'. First error t

  • QR code that triggers an iTunes track download?

    Recently I heard of a band that created a QR code block that when imaged by a smart phone (iPhone for most of us ) caused the phone to contact iTunes, locate a particular one of the band's tracks and then caused the track to be downloaded to the smar

  • Installing SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2 CU 13

    Hi, For one of SQL Server instances the current version is 10.50.4033(SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2 GDR).  Now I am not able to install a cumulative upgrade "2967540 Cumulative update package 13 (CU13)". "There are no SQL Server instances or shared features

  • Oil Paint Filter Crash (potential data loss)

    Trying to apply the oil paint filter to a 45" x 30", 300dpi, 16-bit image I an error dialog that says: "The filter you were using encountered an unknown graphics processor error that caused an unexpected exit. Check the manufacturer's website for the