Enhancement Pack 2 - Material View

Hello Gurus,
we have installed Enhancement Pack 2. In trans. VA03 mark line and push icon Material View. On the tab Sales Prices here I do not see information in List Price Overview and Scale Prices. Material has scale quantity. From where does information come? Thanks for info.
Nija

Hi
Could you please share the your findings for this issue. We also applied Ehp2 and activated the business function for travel management but no ABAP Webdynpo iview is not visible.
Thanks
Ritesh

Similar Messages

MM50 : add new column in the material view

Dear guru.
I need to add a new column of material master in the material view of MM50.
Do you have a solution (exit) in order to solve my problem ?
Thanks.

> I need to add a new field in the MM50 transaction not in MM02.
Der Friend,
Pls be specific about your query. As you know MM50 is for material view extension which is a std SAP trxn to help extend the views set by standard SAP pack and if you are referring new field as a new view then it is not so easily approachable.
Shiva

Recieving ORA-01722 invalid number error while creating a materialized view

Hi,
I am receiving a ORA-01722 invalid number error while creating a materialized view. when run the select statement of the view i don't get any error, but when i use the same select statement to create a materialized view i receive this error. Could any please help in resolving this error. Here is the code i am using to create a materialized view.
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW MV_EBS_CH_CLOSED
REFRESH FORCE ON DEMAND
AS
SELECT DISTINCT kr.request_id, org.org_unit_name,
ebs_ch_ticket_type (kr.request_id) ticket_type,
DECODE
(kr.status_code,
'CLOSED_SUCCESS', kr.last_update_date,
'IN_PROGRESS', (SELECT MAX (start_time)
FROM ebs_ch_datastore ecd1
WHERE kr.request_id = ecd1.request_id
AND workflow_step_name =
'Final BA Review and Deployment Exit Criteria')
) closed_date,
substr(krhd.visible_parameter12,1,10) siebel_start_date,
kr.creation_date itg_start_date
FROM kcrt_requests kr,
kcrt_request_types krt,
kcrt_req_header_details krhd, kcrt_request_details krd1,
(SELECT koum.user_id user_id,
DECODE (koup.org_unit_name,
'IT Implementations', 'CHS - Service Management BA',
koup.org_unit_name
) org_unit_name
FROM krsc_org_unit_members koum, krsc_org_units koup
WHERE 1 = 1
AND 'Y' = koup.enabled_flag
AND koum.org_unit_id = koup.org_unit_id
AND EXISTS (
SELECT 'X'
FROM krsc_org_units kouc
WHERE koup.org_unit_id = kouc.org_unit_id
START WITH kouc.parent_org_unit_id =
ANY (SELECT org_unit_id
FROM krsc_org_units krsc_org_units1
WHERE 'Clearinghouse' =
org_unit_name)
CONNECT BY kouc.parent_org_unit_id =
PRIOR kouc.org_unit_id)
UNION
SELECT kou.manager_id user_id,
DECODE
(kou.org_unit_name,
'IT Implementations', 'CHS - Service Management BA',
kou.org_unit_name
) org_unit_name
FROM krsc_org_units kou
WHERE 'Y' = kou.enabled_flag
START WITH kou.parent_org_unit_id =
(SELECT org_unit_id
FROM krsc_org_units krsc_org_units2
WHERE 'Clearinghouse' = org_unit_name)
CONNECT BY kou.parent_org_unit_id = PRIOR kou.org_unit_id) org
WHERE krt.request_type_id = kr.request_type_id
AND krt.request_type_name IN ('Bug Fix', 'IT Enhancement')
and kr.REQUEST_ID = krd1.request_id
and krd1.batch_number = 1
AND kr.request_id = krhd.request_id
AND org.user_id in (krd1.parameter4, krd1.parameter5, krd1.parameter7)
AND ( 'CLOSED_SUCCESS' = kr.status_code
OR 'IN_PROGRESS' = kr.status_code
AND kr.request_id IN (
SELECT request_id
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT request_id,
MAX
(start_time)
closed_date
FROM ebs_ch_datastore
WHERE 'Final BA Review and Deployment Exit Criteria' =
workflow_step_name
GROUP BY request_id))
Thanks,
Shaik Mohiuddin

This error occurs when you try to create a materialized view , but if you run the sql the results are perfectly fine. Well it happend to me also and to fix this I made sure all the coulmns have the same data type which are used in joins or in where clause.
use
where
to_number(col1)=to_number(col2) and to_number(col3)=to_number(col4)
hope this helps..

HOW TO PACK THE MATERIAL

my problem is,
i had created one packing material handling unit and i have maintain warehouse management.
i had created sales order VA01, outbount delivery VLO1N and transfer orderLT03.
After TOD(Transfer Order) i had been going to VL02N in outbound delivery i had been doing in PGI SOME ERROR SHOWN i.e
1. DELIVERY HAS NOT YET BEEN COMPLETELY PROCESSED BY WH
When i am doing vl02n CLICK ON PACK ICON i had shown in one screen i.e handling units packing materials after I HAD DONE AUTOMATIC PACKING ICON IN TOP RED BUTTON shown one message
there is no packe material. When i was back in showing one message ITEMS IN HU-MANAGED STORAGE LOCATION MUST BE PACKED.
MY PROBLEM IS I WANT TO PACK THE MATERIAL TO HANDLING UNITS PLS GIVE ME SUGGESTION.
Edited by: munnasd on Jun 10, 2009 9:50 AM
Edited by: munnasd on Jun 10, 2009 12:56 PM

Hi, As described by Ramesh the process will follow. However, for packing the materials you need to check in customizing what packaging materials are allowed for the packaging material group for the material in the delivery. The packaging material group for the said material can be found in Material master view Basic data1 under the tab packaging material data. Then go to SPRO-IMG-logistics execution-shipping-packing-define allowed packing material-execute and check which all packaging materials are allowed for the packaging material group. go to your delivery and packing symbol then tab pack material. in the column packing material enter the allowed material in which you want to pack. then use the pack symbol to pack the material and save the delivery. after that the next process will continue.
Pl share whether it worked....
Regards,
vijay

AWM does not provide Materialized Views as potential data sources.

Hi
I would like to map OLAP dimensions and cubes directly to materialized views. The Oracle AWM tool, however, only displays Tables, Views and Synonyms as mapping objects and I have to indirectly map to normal views created over the materialized views.
Why does Oracle enforce this limitation?
Thanks
Kind Regards
Greg

Greg,
Not sure why AWM enforces this limitation, certainly Warehouse Builder does not enforce this rule (at least not to my knowledge). You could raise a bug/enhancement request with Support. However, my recommendation is to never to map directly to a source object, such as a fact table or materialized view, in AWM. This can create all sorts of problems as you move your AWM model across environments. I always suggest to my customers and consultants they create a view over their source objects and use the view within the mapping editor. It will give you more control over the flow of data into your cube/dimension since it allows you to define filters on the view.
Hope this helps
Keith Laker
Oracle EMEA Consulting
BI Blog: http://oraclebi.blogspot.com/
DM Blog: http://oracledmt.blogspot.com/
BI on Oracle: http://www.oracle.com/bi/
BI on OTN: http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/bi/
BI Samples: http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/bi/samples/

SRM 7. 0 with ECC 6.0 Enhancement Pack

1) My client just upgraded their R/3 to ECC 6.0, but no Enhancement Pack.
2) They are trying to upgrade from SRM 5.0 to SRM 7.0 in the near futures.
3) During their first SRM phase, their scenario is limited to the following:
a. R/3 RFQs are pushed to SRM via RFC call (custom program)
b. SRM vendor logs in to see the RFQs and creates Quote
c. SRM buyer evaluates the quotes
4) Question: In order to run the above mentioned scenario without issues, is Enhancement Pack 4 a mandatory component for them, or can ECC 6.0 without any EnH support it already? If it's mandatory, which sub-components of the EnH 4 must be activated in order to support the scenario?
5) Question: In their next SRM phase, they are trying to run scenarios like PPS and Doc Builder. In that case, is Enhancement Pack 4 a mandatory component?
6) Last: Is there any SAP official documentation that maybe answers the question that I listed above?
Thanks.

Hello Jay,
Please find the upgrade information:
https://websmp206.sap-ag.de/upgrade-srm
EhP4 is not mandatory for strategic sourcing, data transfer via RFC can be used.
The benefit with EhP4 for your scenario will be new feature of "Collective Processing of purchase requistion" CPPR; where buyer can select the PReq line items on the portal & create RFx directly in the SRM system. All data transfer is via PI in this scenario. Creating a RFQ in ECC is not a good idea, when you can leverage the RFx capabilities of SRM.
New features: Blog:
/people/michael.jud/blog/2008/09/10/srm-70-in-the-business-suite
Official information :
http://service.sap.com/srm click on SRM 7.0 external view
Hope this solves.
Thanks
Ashutosh

Performance consequences to adding materialized view logs to tables?

I am writing a very complex query for a client of our transactional database system and this will require the creation of a materialized viewbecause all attempts at tuning to make performance acceptable have failed.
I want to enable fast refresh of the MVIEW but I am confused regarding the consequences of the addition of adding materialized view logs to the base tables.
Some of the tables are large and involved in alot of transactions and I am wondering if the performance of INSERT/UPDATES will be seriously affected by the presence of an mview log.
This may be a simple question to answer but I was unable to find a clear cut answer in the literature.
Thanks for any answers!!
Chris Mills
Biotechnology Data Management Consultant

Last time i looked into this there were three cases to consider
If you're doing conventional row-by-row DML then the impact is just one insert into a heap table per row modified.
If you are modifying a high number of rows using bulk-binds then the overhead is very severe because modifying 1,000 rows on the base table causes 1,000 non-bulk bound inserts into the log table.
Direct path inserts have extremely low overhead because the MV log is not touched. Instead, the range of new rowids added is logged in ALL_SUMDELTA
http://oraclesponge.wordpress.com/2005/09/15/optimizing-materialized-views-part-ii-the-direct-path-insert-enhancement/

GTS 8.0 with ECC Enhancment Pack 4 SP2

Hello-
We've recently upgraded our ECC system to Enhancement Pack 4, SP2. We'd like to install GTS 8.0, however I'm unable to find the requirements for GTS 8.0 in enhancement pack terms. I'm only able to find that it requires SPS16, which I'm not able to find any comparisions relating SPS16 to Ehp4 SP2 to see how they stack up.
Basically, can anybody find or refer me to material for GTS requirements in terms after Enhancement Pack 4? Or a note that compares SPS to EhP versions?
Thanks in advance!!
Jeff

Hi Jeff,
SAP note 1266777 provides the information on installation of GTS on ECC with Enhancement Pack.
Best regards,
Howard

Re : Third-Party Order Processing for Subcontracting ( Enhancement Pack 5)

Hi,
In Third-Party Order Processing for subcontracting - Purchase orders for products that are finished by a subcontractor and sent straight to the end customer. PR created in Sales system are processed further in this scenario where you direct your SC Vendor to send the material to your customer.
Although its a standard third party scenario with sub contracting job involved in it.
There is not much information we have in SAP help. This is ECC6 Enhancement pack 5 feature.
If any one has worked on this, I need a process flow to understand this process.
Response is apprecited,
Regards,
Dipak
Edited by: Dipak Kumar on Apr 13, 2011 6:43 AM
Any idea is appreciated?

Hi,
Here you can treat this two procedures are diffrent
For Contractor
Create P.O >> send semifinish goods to vendor
For sales Point
Sales order >> PR >> PO >> Vendor invoice reciept >> Customer invoice Issue wrt order.

Impact of enhancement pack 3 on ECC

Hi,
can you please explain what are the impacts of enhancement Pack 3 on the SAP ECC server, and how if we migrate to EHP-3.
thanks
Regards
SR

Syed,
The question you have asked is more from a technical point of view...I'll put this into a laymen language
let's say..your organization is currently running on IS Oil and wants to use certain feature of IS Health Care or IS Media...so instead of installing the whole package, only that part will be activated; now if that feature can be met by say installing EhP3...the Basis guy needs to ensure that he has install and fulfill the technical requirements first..then only from the functional side you will be able to activate and use the feature.
one note of caution: Once activated, you can not switch off this functionality
SAP Notes are there with all the information and the prerequisites for installation.
You can check that on [www.service.sap.com|www.service.sap.com]
Regards,
N

Refresh/Update data in a materialized view

Hi,
I have question about the data in a materialized view and how it is refreshed. My mat view has all my dimension-ids and my (for my specialize needs) aggregated measures from my fact table. I used the mat view wizard to create my view - which works perfectly. But now I wonder if I have to create some sort of mapping(?) or some sort of trigger to refresh the data in the mat view. Or is the data automatically refreshed when I start my fact table mappings. I use OWB 11gR2
thx

MVs have properties for refresh - you an refresh based on schedules or when dependent data is committed or manually.
Cheers
David

How can I fast refresh the materialized view !!

I created a MV base on some tables in order to improve the querey speed.
but the mv I have created falied to refresh fast.
because there are two same table in the from clause:
jcdm jc1,jcdm jc2
create materialized view temp_mv
nologging
pctfree 0
storage (initial 2048k next 2048k pctincrease 0)
parallel
build immediate
refresh force
on demand
as
select
TAB_GSHX.rowid hx_rid,
TAB_GSHD.rowid hd_rid ,
JC1.rowid jc1_rid ,
JC2.rowid jc2_rid ,
YSHD_ID     HXID,
JC1.JCDM     QFD,
JC2.JCDM     JLD
FROM
TAB_GSHX,
TAB_GSHD,
jCDM JC1,
JCDM JC2
WHERE
YSHD_ID=YSHX_ID
AND YSHD_QFD=JC1.JBJC_ID
AND YSHD_JLD=JC2.JBJC_ID
AND TO_CHAR(YSHX_time,'YYYYMMDD')='20030101'
the column msgtxt of the table MV_CAPABILITIES_TABLE is :
"the multiple instances of the same table or view" and " one or more joins present in mv".
How can I succeed in fast refresh the above temp_mv!!!
thanks.

lianjun,
When you are using Oracle9i there is a procedure which can help you setup the materialized view. If some option isn't working it gives you hint why it doesn't work.
The procedure is dbms_mview.explain_mview.
Take a look at the documentation how to use it. (In the Oracle9i DWH guide the package is explained.)
Hope this helps
With kind regards,
Bas Roelands

How to get Materialized View to ignore unused columns in source table

When updating a column in a source table, records are generated in the corresponding materialized view log table. This happens even if the column being updated is not used in any MV that references the source table. That could be OK, so long as those updates are ignored. However they are not ignored, so when the MV is fast refreshed, I find it can take over a minute, even though no changes are required or made. Is there some way of configuring the materialized view log such that the materialized view refresh ignores these updates ?
So for examle if I have table TEST:
CREATE table test (
d_id NUMBER(10) PRIMARY KEY,
d_name VARCHAR2(100),
d_desc VARCHAR2(256)
This has an MV log MLOG$_TEST:
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON TEST with rowid, sequence, primary key;
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW test_mv
refresh fast on demand
as
select d_id, d_name
from test;
INSERT 200,000 records
exec dbms_mview.refresh('TEST_MV','f');
update test set d_desc = upper(d_desc) ;
exec dbms_mview.refresh('TEST_MV','f'); -- This takes 37 seconds, yet no changes are required.
Oracle 10g/11g

I would love to hear a positive answer to this question - I have the exact same issue :-)
In the "old" days (version 8 I think it was) populating the materialized view logs was done by Oracle auto-creating triggers on the base table. A "trick" could then make that trigger become "FOR UPDATE OF <used_column_list>". Now-a-days it has been internalized so such "triggers" are not visible and modifiable by us mere mortals.
I have not found a way to explicitly tell Oracle "only populate MV log for updates of these columns." I think the underlying reason is that the MV log potentially could be used for several different materialized views at possibly several different target databases. So to be safe that the MV log can be used for any MV created in the future - Oracle always populates MV log at any update (I think.)
One way around the problem is to migrate to STREAMS replication rather than materialized views - but it seems to me like swatting a fly with a bowling ball...
One thing to be aware of: Once the MV log has been "bloated" with a lot of unneccessary logging, you may perhaps see that all your FAST REFRESHes afterwards becomes slow - even after the one that checked all the 200000 unneccessary updates. We have seen that it can happen that Oracle decides on full table scanning the MV log when it does a fast refresh - which usually makes sense. But after a "bloat" has happened, the high water mark of the MV log is now unnaturally high, which can make the full table scan slow by scanning a lot of empty blocks.
We have a nightly job that checks each MV log if it is empty. If it is empty, it locks the MV log and locks the base table, checks for emptiness again, and truncates the MV log if it is still empty, before finally unlocking the tables. That way if an update during the day has happened to bloat the MV log, all the empty space in the MV log will be reclaimed at night.
But I hope someone can answer both you and me with a better solution ;-)

Materialized View to run only once in a year...

Hi everybody...
I want to create a materialized view which will run only once in a year and specifically some minutes after 00:00 a.m. on new year's day,
so i created the following:
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW <mv_name>
BUILD IMMEDIATE
REFRESH START WITH TO_DATE('01/01/2007 00:15:00','DD/MM/RRRR HH24:MI:SS')
NEXT SYSDATE+366
I have two notes:
1) how to declare the refresh to be done the first new year's day after the day it'll be created , i mean not static date (01/01/2007)
2)some years are leap and some are not , so in order to run every new year's day how should i transform the above..????
3)is there any view which displays the next run of a materialized view..???
the view DBA_MV_REFRESH_TIMES displays the last refresh of mv's...
I use Oracle 10.2.0.1 on XP ...
Thanks , a lot
Simon

1).
use the expression that evaluates to next january first.
SQL> select sysdate, add_months(trunc(sysdate, 'yyyy'), 12) from dual ;
SYSDATE ADD_MONTHS(
19-JUN-2006 01-JAN-2007
1 row selected.
SQL>2). for this also use the same expression that will evaluate to the january first of the year after that.

Is it possible to refresh the table from a Materialized view

Hi,
Is it possible to update the underlying table on which a Materialized view is created when some changes in a Materialized view is done.Is this reverse compatibility possible in Materialized View?
Thanks in Advance,
V.Dennis

If you created the materialized view as UPDATEABLE then changes to it should automatically be relected in the underlying table. If this is not occurring I suggest you check the replication jobs. You probably have a stack of errors in DEFERROR.
Cheers, APC

Enhancement Pack 2 - Material View

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for