Enumeration conflict

I am getting an enumeration conflict with the averaging type input of the fractional octave analysis VI.
"You have two or more enumeration data types wired together, but the enumerations are different. The list of items in the enumerations must be exactly the same."
The problem is that I only want to give the user 2 options - exp or linear, I don't want option 2 or 3, just 0 or 1. Howe can I force this VI to accept my input?

There is an option of programmatically disable items on front panel control (attached)
Sergey
Attachments:
disable enum's.vi ‏25 KB

Similar Messages

Enumeration conflict when wiring a bundle output to a subvi

Hello, I am trying to wire a cluster to a subvi, and I keep getting an enumeration error. The same number of components is expected. The only thing I can think of is that it wants the cluster to be bundled by name, but I can't do that either.

It could be the order of components of the clusters in the called and callee vi's is different.
In the called subVi, right click on the cluster and select
reoder controls in cluster, and note the order.
Then , when you wire the bundled data cluster to the subVi, follow the same order, or else some data will not match

Issue in connecting sub VI programs through the main program

Sir/Madam,
                   I have made a few sub VI programs of 'Keithley 2400', but I am having problem in connecting them together through the main program. Actually the created sub VI programs are not showing any activation button when I connect 'action.vi' file in 'read.vi' file (attachted).
Please give suggestions.
Regards
Yachika Manglik
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
action.vi ‏24 KB
read.vi ‏14 KB
write.vi ‏24 KB

Hello
Thanks for your suggestion.
I have successfully implemented connections in my code according to your given suggestion .
Now I am facing problem to link a file named 'control1.ctl'(attached) that I have made for selecting option 'select type of action' and need to add' control1.ctl' in 'read.vi' file. It is showing following error( below).
Error: " required input ' GPIB action' is not wired.
                 OR
           "Enumeric conflict"
So can you please suggest how this error can be removed?
Attachments:
Control 1.ctl ‏5 KB
read.vi ‏13 KB

Resource Conflict Warning (ACPI/NON-ACPI devices) while installing solaris

Hi,
I am trying to install Solaris 8 on my system.
Intel Celeron 1.7 Ghz
128 MB RAM
Gigabyte 8LD 533K Motherboard with Intel Chipset.
While installing, the second installation screen titled "Bus
Enumeration" gives the following warning.
Warning: Resource Conflict:
ACPI Device: PNP0C01.
Memory: (about 5 to 6 memory addresses in hexadecimal form are shown)
NON-ACPI Device: PNP0C01.
Memory: (about 5 to 6 memory addresses in hexadecimal form are shown,
which are different from the ones shown under the ACPI device list)
I ignored the message and pressed F2 key as suggested.
The next screen "Solaris Boot" comes and after choosing the CD (as
the target from which the OS is to be installed), The next screen
comes up asking me to chose the type of installation 1) Solaris
Interactive and 2) Jumpstart. No matter which option I choose, the
system shows 2-3 messages, and even before I can read them, the
system reboots. Thus I am unable to install Solaris.
I searched on Google and as one person had suggested tried tweaking
the BIOS. (Disable APM etc). But it did not work, because I don't
have an option that specifically gives the Disable/Enable option for
APM. I get the Advanced Power Management screen, but it shows some
different options.
I spoke about this problem with a friend who has some experience on
Solaris and he put the CD Drive and the Hard Disk on two different
buses, but it didn't help. I still get the same message.
I would be very grateful if someone could suggest a method so I can
install Solaris.
Regards,
pmu

The next screen comes up asking me to chose the type of installation 1) Solaris
Interactive and 2) Jumpstart. At this screen, type
b kadb -v
instead of choosing 1) or 2). Now you should be able to read the error messages from the kernel that
prevent booting into Solaris.

Solaris 8 x86: Resource Conflict

Hello,
My x86 PC has:
- Elitegroup K7S5A mainboard
- AMD Athlon K7 XP 2400+ Socket A thoroughbred CPU
- AmiBIOS
- 256 MB SDRAM
- 2 Hard Disks with 40 GB each
When I start Solaris 8 installation with the installation CD, the following is displayed in the screen "Bus Enumeration":
Determining bus types and gathering hardware configuration data ...
Warning: Resource Conflict - both devices are added
NON-ACPI device: ISY0050
Port: 3F0-3F5, 3F7; IRQ: 6; DMA: 2
ACPI device: ISY0050
Port: 3F2-3F3, 3F4-3F5; 3F7; IRQ: 6; DMA: 2
Next screen with "Bus Enumeration" shows:
Warning: Resource Conflict - both devices are added
NON-ACPI device: CSC0001
Port: 200-207
ACPI device: CSC0001
Port: 201-208
Next screen "Scanning Devices" works o.k.
Then the boot starts in line modus and shows the following:
error: Configuration error - missing controller?
The root file system is not mounted and the configuration assistant has exited prematurely. Booting is unlikely to succeed.
Shortly later boot stops.
Please, can anybody tell me what the root of the error is? Is there something to be configured in the BIOS?
Thank you very much in advance!
Thomas

Continuing installation of my Solaris 8 x86 after a long break.
As mentioned above, the installation works now with the patched ata.bef. The installation seems to work o.k. After completion of the installation, I boot to the second hard disk where my Solaris 8 x86 installation is located. Solaris boot manager appears, Solaris boot process begins but shortly after, it stops with the following message:
error: Configuration error - missing controller?
The root filesystem is not mounted and the configuration assistant has exited prematurely. Booting is unlikely to succeed. CRL-ALT-DEL may be used to reset the machine.
Failover to boot interpreter - type ctrl-d to resume boot
Pressing ctrl-d leads to
boot: source: open of '/etc/bootrc' failed
My configuration as mentioned at the beginning of the thread did not change in the meantime. Is there any idea what is wrong?
Thanks in advance!
Thomas

How to resolve xjc method name conflict?

Hi! I'm having a problem with certain types of schema constructs and the method names in the xjc-generated classes. E.g., given the schema fragment:
<xs:element name="DocRef_type">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:simpleContent>
<xs:extension base="xs:integer">
<xs:attribute name="value" use="required">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:enumeration value="medline"/>
<xs:enumeration value="pubmed"/>
<xs:enumeration value="ncbigi"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:attribute>
</xs:extension>
</xs:simpleContent>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
xjc (current release) fails on this schema, because it would generate overlapping method names: one getValue() to return the integer value, and one getValue() to return the string attribute named "value". Now, I know I can fix this by just changing 'name="value"' to 'name="somethingElse"' in the above attribute, but this breaks existing XML data we've already got that uses value="...".
Is there some way to tell xjc to use a different name mapping to resolve this conflict in the generated java class?
TIA for any tips,
- Paul

You can customize the name of the property representing the attribute. E.g.:
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:jaxb="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxb"
jaxb:version="1.0">
<xs:attribute name="value" use="required">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:appinfo>
<jaxb:property name="attValue"/>
</xs:appinfo>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
-- Ed

Soundblaster Live Platinum on Win 98 / SB16 enumeration hang

I removed my Platinum card from an old computer to place in a Vaio, but they turned out to be imcompatible...so I went to replace it in the old computer. When I tried to reinstall, the plug & play of Win98 keeps getting snagged during start up while "loading SB6 enumeration". The software seems to be up and running with that one flaw...once the soundcard is placed in the PCI slot and enabled, the computer freezes.
Any hints?
Thanks,
Vance

Right, we've tried some more things now so will update on the problem. We've disconnected the li've dri've, which made no difference at all. We've swapped sound cards. I now have the Platinum card in my system and it's working perfectly. The Soundblaster card that I used to have on the MSI motherboard is now back on my husband's PC (where it was originally installed with no sound problems) and we're getting the scratchy, screeching problem. The only thing we can think of now is a software conflict somewhere...any ideas?

X300 bluetooth enumerator cannot start

pls. help! my bluetooth enumerator cannot start. the message is "this device cannot start: error code 10", i tried uninstalling it and it still registers the same after it installs the device driver. i did not come with this error message when i first got my x300. my device can see the laptop and the laptop can see the device. but it cannot pair and it only succeeds until seeing it. any idea?

Your laptop model should have built-in BT 4.0 adapter, Liteon or Foxconn manufactured, based on the Broadcom chip BCM20702, the same as the dongle is.
So, for OS drivers there is a hardware conflict. Broadcom drivers isn't being installed properly because of BT adapters (built-in and external) have different USB IDs. I suppose manufacturer drivers from Broadcom site doesn't support IDs of built-in adapter. Its disabling within Device Manager doesn't matter for conflict resolving.
Further steps depend of your plans for built-in adapter using.
x220 | i5-2520m | Intel ssd 320 series | Gobi 2000 3G GPS | WiFi
x220 | i5-2520m | hdd 320 | Intel msata ssd 310 series | 3G GPS | WiFi
Do it well, worse becomes itself
Русскоязычное Сообщество English Community Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español

IWD Bus Enumerator

Lenovo Solution Center has identified that one of my IWD Bus Enumerators has a problem and has disabled it. Is there a way that I can rectify the problem or do I need to contact Lenovo for a warranty solution?

Hi,
I suspect that there’re some driver conflicts or you should install the latest drivers , I suggest you uninstall the issued one and reboot your PC, it will automatically install the drivers, check if it works.
Here is a similar link:
https://forums.lenovo.com/t5/T400-T500-and-newer-T-series/quot-IWD-Bus-Enumerator-disabled-quot-error-message-in-LSC-after/td-p/1270269
But for detailed cause, I suggest you contact the Lenovo support.
http://support.lenovo.com/en_SG/
NOTE
This response contains a reference to a third party World Wide Web site. Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. Microsoft does not control these sites and has not tested any software or information found on these sites.
Regards,
Yolanda
Yolanda
TechNet Community Support

Crystal Report 2008 SP3 and BO XI 3.1 conflict

Hi every body,
We have a BOE system:
BO XI 3.1
Oracle db 10g
All running successful and can create some types of WebI report.
But we also want reports with Crystal Report.
1> So we install Crystal Report 2008 SP3 (without knowing the conflict error between BO XI 3.1 and Crystal Report 2008 SP3 and overwrite some .dll file). After installing, we can not create WebI report any more. And a error message box display: "DBDriver failed to load: C:\Program File\Business Objects\BusinessObjects ENterprise12.0\win32_x86\dataAccess\connectionServer\dbd_oci.dll ".
2> We uninstall Crystal Report SP3. But this is not the solution. Still error because of missing .dll files.
3> We open BO XI 3.1 setup and repair BO XI 3.1. Even we uninstall BO XI 3.1, delete all of its components and delete in regedit key. We install BO XI 3.1 again. Now we have full .dll file, not missing them any more. But when we open universe and click on Table browser, cannot fetching any tables.
We set rights for Oracle DB user again. But still error: cannot fetching.
4> We searched the solution for this problem on the internet. But not worked, no answer.
Can somebody help me bring back the BOE system state again ? pls :"<
T______T

Hi Paul,
I hope I read your question right!
Yes, It is possible to run XIR2 and 3.1 on the same server although it's not recommended by BO. You will need to make sure they are both pointing to different CMS databases and different FRS repositories, like you already mentioned you will need to specify different ports for the CMS db and Tomcat.
Why not uninstall Business Objects XI R2 in your BO development environment or a spare server (if you have one), and do a clean install of XI 3.1 SP3.
Tip: If you were already having performance issues with your XI R2 environment, I would seriously consider upgrading the hardware. XI 3.1 needs a bit more RAM and CPU than XI R2
Regards
Rim Geurts

OIM 9.1.0.2 - User group permission conflict issue

Hi Gurus,
IHAC who have faced a strange behavior about permission conflict.
User has been assigned to a user group (ANALISTA DRSI) who have permission to disable resource of the users he administrates. The user group has been assigned to resource's administrator.
The same use has been assigned to other user group (ANALISTA ADM DRSI) who have other permission. The user group has been not assigned to resource's administrator.
If the user has been only assigned to ANALISTA DRSI user group the user is able to see records on Rogue Account report. If the customer has been assigned to both ANALISTA DRSI and ANALISTA ADM the user is not able to see the record on Rogue Account report. He got a display error message (You do not have permission). Both user groups have the Report menu item assigned.
My question: if the customer is assigned to a user group who have permission to see the reports, should not the user is able to see the report even though he is also into the other group who do not have permission?
Is there conflit in the OIM???
Any tip will be very appreciated.

Orgnaization > Manage > Select Org in which users are getting created > Administrative Group (Drop Down) > Select Group for which users are not coming.

I have a macbook 4.1 with osx10.6.8 and just added memory (2gig) so I could sync my new Ipome and Ipad. and Ipad. Now I'm told I need to upgrade my operating system. The apple store gave me conflicting instructions. Any suggestions? Thanks

I have a macbook 4.1 with osx10.6.8 and just added memory (2gig) so I could sync my new IPhone and Ipad. Now I'm told at the apple store that I need to upgrade my operationg system. They said they couldn't help and gave me conflicting advice about what to do. Any ideas? Thanks you!

There are three models of MacBook that comprise the 'macbook 4.1' category, and each of them a little different; however other than 'macbook 4.1' the other thing they have in common is they all are considered Early 2008. Two are white, one black, polycarbonate case, Core2Duo 2.1GHz, 2.4GHz white, 2.4GHz black.
So if you can determine which one, if any of these, is the model build year and spec you have, that would be handy. Did you tell whoever you spoke to the serial number of your computer, so they'd know by looking up the specs to see what the supported maximum RAM upgrade capacity was, and other minimum requirements to make any upgrade to Mac OS X 10.6.8 at all?
If you have the serial number you can do a lookup to 'indentify by serial number' online, and use that information to determine if the computer needs even more RAM to take it past the minimum for Snow Leopard 10.6.8 and then get it ready to upgrade (via paid download from App Store, Snow Leopard gets you that far) and see what the next supported OS X full upgrade would be for the hardware limitations on that old MacBook.
If your MacBook IS a 4.1 build, the highest OS X it could run if it has the 2.4GHz cpu, is Lion 10.7.5. That would be an upgrade from the App store, available to OS X 10.6.8+ computers that access it online. And I kind of doubt how supported a newest iphone etc may be in lion.
everymac.com has a fair amount of information across many years of Apple computing hardware...
Here's the three MacBooks that share the 4.1 designation; first shipped with as much as 1GB RAM upgrade and the other two only a 2GB RAM*, (one white/one black color) according to this information...
• MacBook "Core 2 Duo" 2.1 13" (White-08) 2.1 GHz Core 2 Duo (T8100)
• MacBook "Core 2 Duo" 2.4 13" (White-08) 2.4 GHz Core 2 Duo (T8300)
• MacBook "Core 2 Duo" 2.4 13" (Black-08) 2.4 GHz Core 2 Duo (T8300)
...as seen here: http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/macbook/index-macbook.html
*But according to MacTracker (free: download database) http://mactracker.ca
these MacBooks can use more RAM in aftermarket specs as much as:
Maximum Memory
6.0 GB (Actual) 4.0 GB (Apple)
Memory Slots
2 - 200-pin PC2-5300 (667MHz) DDR2 SO-DIMM
To get more information use a service such as this...
•identify by serial number:
http://www.powerbookmedic.com/identify-mac-serial.php
The Apple? store or whoever you talked, to may have been as accurate as they could be without further research. Could be you may have a newer or older MacBook, which would change whatever later OS X it could run past 10.6.8. And to go past Snow Leopard, you need to download the last bits for 10.6.x to be able to go and get any later upgrade. The ones that may let a newest iphone or ipad work with it, are past SL10.6.8
Anyway, as you further verify the model build year and configuration specifications, report back.
Good luck & happy computing!

CTE : ERRO MONITOR ( Type conflict in program /XNFE/SAPLGROUPING )

Ola Sap Experts, preciso de uma mão de vcs.
Estou em um ambiente de um cliente onde o monitor de outbound de CTe, quando se tenta acessar o detalhe da CTe ou qualquer outra ação é gerado o erro "Type conflict in program /XNFE/SAPLGROUPING. (termination; RABAX_STATE)" é gerado um dump na ST22.
O cliente nao tem qualquer customizacao desse monitor usa de maneira standart e se encontra no sp 16 do SLL-NFe rodando em base de um PI 7.31 dual stack.
Alguem já passou ou esta passando por isso ?

Prezados,
Alguém conseguiu resolver o DUMP?
Estamos enfrentando o mesmo problema no projeto, mas o erro só ocorre quando testamos um cenário com IPI Return.
Alguma dica?
Obrigada,
Tatiana Augusto

Can I Suppress Conflicting Names Messages in the TestStand Deployment Log?

I have a deployment that is being built via a command line calling the deployment utility. It is all being done with a script. I then use the deployment log for information to e-mail to myself and others about the build. I am getting conflicting name messages for VIs in the Labview Reports library that is shipped from NI. There are a lot of message about VIs being renamed because of this. Is there a way of suppressing these messages so real information can be observed and not missed because of all this spam? I don't want to have a real problem over looked because of these messages being generated about items that are not in my control. Thanks in advance for any help.
Troy

What version of TestStand, and LabVIEW are you using? Have you seen How to Successfully Deploy a TestStand System with LabVIEW 8.6 and Report Generation Toolkit ?
Richard S -- National Instruments --Applications Engineer -- Data Acquisition with TestStand

K7N2 DELTA ILSR has conflicted with ram....

K7N2 DELTA ILSR has conflicted with this ram....
http://www.kingmax.com/product/pro_superMPXB62D-383.htm
I got 2 * 256MB DDR 400 of the above ram.
Is there any conflicted with K7N2 DELTA??
amd 2500+
thank you
BIOS version 7.4

Quote
Originally posted by utada
I have already brought kingmax
These boards are very picky with RAM. As Bonz has pointed out their is an approved list near the top of the Forum but unfortunately I don't beleive Kingmax is on it. Sometimes the generic RAMS run, sometimes not. It seems to be hit or miss. If you want a recommendation of good quality RAM I would suggest MUSHKIN first and CORSAIR second. Good Luck
Rob

Enumeration conflict

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for