ER Contribution for Pension not Reflecting in Payroll.

Hi Experts,
I have an issue in Pension ER contribution in Payroll.
We have created a function to calculate the ER contribution and incorporated in Schema (INT). while running the payroll
ER contribution is not reflecting Payroll.
Note: We are passing the calculated result to WT0902 Pension ER contribution in RT directly by referring structure PC207.
Correct me if this is the rite approach.
Regards
Raj

Hi,
Insted of going through SCHEMA please configure this table in simple way and check whether your client need is getting fullfilled if it is for indian payroll.
V_T7INF1,V_T7INF5,V_T7INF5,V_T7INF3
Go to pa30 and choose infotype 0587 and fill the details and for pension you can either give percentage or the fixed amount and run the payroll
Thanks
Vibin

Similar Messages

  • Wage type not processed in payroll

    Hi friends
    in infotype 14 a wage type entry is made but that wage type is not reflecting in payroll.
    please help  in solving this..
    regards
    nikki gupta

    Hello,
    Check the Payroll Log, Search by P0014, check the input and output whether IT 14 record exists and moved to IT table, if it so then next check why it is not added to RT. If it is not there in P0014 input table then check your IT 14 entry whether date and other entries are correct.
    With Regards,
    S.Karthik

  • F4 help not reflecting in ALV Grid for fixed values specified in domain

    Hi experts,
       As per subject i have a field for which i have assigned 5 fixed values in the domain level (of that field) . The problem is when i am displaying my ALV grid output i need a F4 help and F4 Option for the same is not reflecting and i have assigned in the field catlog as shown bellow.
    wa_fcat-fieldname = 'ZDEPLOY'.
      wa_fcat-tabname = 'IT_FINAL'.
    wa_fcat-f4availabl = 'X'.
    wa_fcat-key     =  'X'.
      WA_FCAT-SELTEXT_L = 'Deployment Planned'.
      wa_fcat-outputlen = '25'.
       WA_FCAT-EDIT = 'X'.
       WA_FCAT-REF_FIELDNAME = 'ZDEPLOY'.
       WA_FCAT-REF_TABNAME = 'ZETMDEPL'.
      APPEND WA_FCAT TO IT_FIELDCAT.
      CLEAR WA_FCAT.
    for the above field the f4 help is not reflecting.
    Intrestingly i have another field which i have declared using the same procedure for which my F4 help (with fixed values ) is reflecting in the same program .with the values as shown below
        wa_fcat-fieldname = 'ZFINAL'.
      wa_fcat-tabname = 'IT_FINAL'.
      WA_FCAT-SELTEXT_L = 'Final Status'.
      wa_fcat-outputlen = '10'.
       WA_FCAT-EDIT = 'X'.
       wa_fcat-ref_fieldname = 'ZFINAL'.
       wa_fcat-ref_tabname = 'ZETMDEPL'.
      APPEND WA_FCAT TO IT_FIELDCAT.
      CLEAR WA_FCAT.
    can u plz suggest me with a solution .
    Regards,
    Edited by: abhilash aswath on Oct 20, 2010 3:32 PM
    Moderator message: please do not use SMS speak.
    Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Oct 20, 2010 3:58 PM

    hi,
    There was a mismatch of characteristics. I resolved by matching the same.

  • Changes are not reflecting on same system for WD Component

    Hi ,
    I have one interesting issue , I have done some changes in Webdynpro component , changes are reflecting for some users but not reflecting for some other users on the same system. Can anyone tell me why it is behaving like that ?
    In R/3 I have faced this issue , this is one option of GENERATE via this I have resolved this issue but how i will do it here?
    Thanks
    Ankesh Jindal

    I am not sure if i understand your real problem here.
    It could be very well related to Personalization and Customization.
    Go to SICF transaction and then
    sap/bc/webdynpro/sap/wd_analyze_config_user

  • Iview for a tcode not reflecting the fields completely.

    Hi All,
    I made an iview for a business partner in portal for its tcode.The tcode of Buisness partner is showing all  fields in GUI.But when i am viewing the Business partner using it transaction  iview it is showing properly except at a particular dropdown where it is showing only two fields out of three.One of the fields is getting missed out in the dropdown.
    Regards.
    Adity.

    Ya ....just want to make my question little clear.
    We have CRM 5.0 and EP 7.0.
    We have a dropdown in tcode BP(Business Partner) called relationship.This dropdown when clicked shows only two fields ie.list and heirarchy and not reflecting field 'network' in portal but reflecting in GUI
    The client and the user are correct.Am using SAP gui for HTML.
    Regards.
    Adity.

  • E Recruitment -Candidate applied for job but not reflected candidate name

    E Recruitment
    Candidate applied for job but not reflected candidate name Recruiter Dashboard
    Please any one suggests me what is problem?
    Regards
    Eshwar

    Hello Sri,
    the solution to your first question might be very easy. In EhP 4 the entries in the dashboard do not appear automatically. In most cases you have to refresh the dashboard (be aware this is only effecting the current dashboard work list, not all if you do not use the refresh all button). Soclick the "My new Applications" and then refress this workset.
    If this does not help we will have to look closer into this issue (overall I assume you have EhP4 SP 6 applied).
    For question 2. It is a quite common requirement that an external publication is nearly only based on the posting texts while the internal publication includes much more specific information (org. management, cost center, pay scale group). As you are free in designing you own company specific internal and external publications they can look however you want (in the general restriction what a smartform can do of course). For different publication texts companies create different postings one for internal and one for external publication. The additional information are in some cases entered directly into these texts, in some cases maintained in e-rec fields not needed for other requirements, in customer own fields or directly gathered from the HR core system. It depends a bit on the exact requirement which is the best solution. For the fields you mentioned I'd probably go for OM integration for e-rec (assigning positions to requisition) and get the Information via customer RFC function module directly in the smartform (if the security guys allow the access to the HR system from the e-rec system).
    For question 3. The manager should be able to see the decision maker data overview. Here you can include whatever you want as you can replace it with a customer developed smartform.
    Kind Regards
    Roman

  • Child part demand for Subcontractor parts not reflecting in SNP

    Hi
    I have a situation where the demand for child parts are not reflecting in SNP.
    The demand for the parent parts are visible in SNP, but the demand in turn is not being reflected against child parts that are Subcontractor parts.
    The demand for child parts are visible in R/3 and in Product View (/SAPAPO/RRP3 - Product View) in APO, but not in the planning book.
    Please can you assist me.
    Thanx in advance.
    Keegan

    Hi Gaurav
    Let me give you further detail to explain the problem.
    Child part - A
    Parent part - B
    Finished Product - C
    Step 1 - We purchase part "A".
    Step 2 - We supply part "A" to subcontractor supplier,
                  who after processing part "A" supplies back to us part "B".
    Step 3 - We issue part "B" to finished product "C" ,as part "B" is a BOM component for part "C"
    The problem we face is that when Demand for part "C" comes through, it in turn places Dependant Demand on BOM compnent part "B".
    The APO SNP system then raises Purchase Reqs for part "B" which is placed on our Subcontractor supplier.
    However the demand for part "B" is not distributed to part "A" which we need to raise Purchase Reqs for as it is needed to be supplied to Subcontractor to process for us and then in turn supply back to us part "B".
    Please advise as to how we can distribute the demand for part "B" to part "A" as there is a 1 to 1 ratio, so for every 1 part "A" we purchase and supply to Subcontractor, we raise a Purchase Req against the Subcontractor to receive back 1 part "B" which we issue to Production order for finished part "C".
    Also please let me know what the settings in the R/3 material masters should be for part "A"and "B" on tabs MRP 1, 2, 3 and 4
    Please let me know if there is any other info you require from me, to assist me.
    Thanx in advance
    Keegan

  • Warning to error message not reflecting for message no06219

    Sir,
    ply help me for the message no "06219" which is used for po
    purpose system should not take price from last po if validity expires.
    this message is not reflecting
    regards
    amey

    from OSS Note 675523 - Conditions are copied from Last Purchase Order:
    Use the user parameter EVO to indicate that no price adoption from last Purchase Order must take place:
    IMG: MM -> Purchasing -> Environment data -> Default values for Buyers
    -> Setting for Default values.
    Select or setup a default value and on the "price adoption" tab you may choose how copying of conditions from last purchase order must behave. Select "Do not copy".
    Then assign this default value to the user, using the EVO parameter.

  • Not reflecting the sales offices for top down manual planning hierarchy

    Hi Experts,
    Please help me on this issue.
    I hava an Hierarchy like from District to Offices
    for eg: for district-                'ZBHDEL' I have salesoffice like 100, 101, 102, 103,105.
    like wise for other district          'zbhyd' i have salesoffices like 200, 201, 202.
    I have created the Mannual layout with Hierachy datamodel with BPS characteristics, TOP-DOWN, AND enabled check entry.
    In the additional setting i have select All Possible combinations.
    District at Headerlevl, along with Product and Division
    and selected salesoffice at Leadcoloumn.
    My Planning levell and package contains : for sales office slected Hierarchy at planning level. 
    BRAND
    Base Unit
    Company code
    Country
    Currency
    Division
    Fiscal year/period
    Fiscal Year Variant
    PRODUCT
    SIZE
    Sales District
    Sales Office
    Segment
    Version   
    *The Prolem is when i input some plan for a district ZBHDEL from the other layout, WHEN I RUN THE sALES OFFICE hIERARCHY
    Mannual Layout its not reflecting the sales office where i have to plan for the salesoffices by seeing the values
    of planned District.
    where as for one district i can able to see the sales offices. even i have maintained the masterdata at Infoobject level.
    Can anybody please help me out.
    thanks
    Deenu
    Edited by: deenu prasad on Aug 4, 2010 7:07 AM

    Create hierarchy for sales district info-object in following way.
    Sales District         Text Node                          Level 1
    Sales Distirct         Characteristics Node         Level 2         
                                  value 1 = ZBHDEL
                                  value 2 = ZBHYD
    sales Office          Characteristics Node         Level 3
                                  values will be according to district (include diff sales offices for diff districts in level 2)
    restrict district to this hierarchy in planning level and plan according by both approaches (create 2 seperate layouts):
    Top down  - to plan at main node i.e. sales district
    bottom up - to plan at sub node  i.e. sales office

  • Iterator not reflected on entering new values for the row

    Hi,
    I am having an editable table coming from an EJB Stateless Session Bean. I created a data control out of the session bean and dragged and dropped the output
    of the method in the session bean as a table in the jspx page. On click of the "Create" link, I have an action listener that creates a new row in the top of
    the table.
    DCIteratorBinding iter = DFUtils.findIterator("getMultSortReportListIterator");
    RowSetIterator rowSetIter = iter.getRowSetIterator();
    Row row = rowSetIter.createRow();
    row.setNewRowState(Row.STATUS_NEW);
    row.setAttribute("reportName", "");
    row.setAttribute("sectionName", "");
    row.setAttribute("userId", "");
    row.setAttribute("viewCriteria", "");
    rowSetIter.insertRowAtRangeIndex(0, row);
    rowSetIter.setCurrentRowAtRangeIndex(0);
    After the row is created, I enter values into the row and click on "Save" link. The action Listener for the save link is:
    BindingContainer bindings = getBindings();
    DCIteratorBinding iter = (DCIteratorBinding) bindings.get("getMultSortReportListIterator");
    //Read the entered values from the iterator
    Row currentRow = iter.getRowAtRangeIndex(0);
    String reportName = currentRow.getAttribute("reportName").toString();
    String sectionName = currentRow.getAttribute("sectionName").toString();
    Long userId = Long.parseLong(currentRow.getAttribute("userId").toString());
    String viewCriteria = currentRow.getAttribute("viewCriteria").toString();
    //Store to database
    MultipleSortReport multipleSortReportBean = new MultipleSortReport(reportName, sectionName, userId, viewCriteria);
    OperationBinding operationBinding = bindings.getOperationBinding("persistMultipleSortReportTest");
    Map params = operationBinding.getParamsMap();
    params.put("multipleSortReportObj", multipleSortReportBean);
    IMultipleSortReport multipleSortReportInfo = (IMultipleSortReport)operationBinding.execute();
    The problem is that after entering the values into the newly created row, I have to tab out of the row and click with the mouse to place the cursor in the
    end of the next row's first field for the iterator to reflect the entered values. If i enter the last column in the new row and after entering it I directly
    click on "Save", the newly entered values are not reflected in the iterator. The iterator is still reflecting the old values of the row i.e. "" empty fields
    as it was initialized during Create Row.
    Can you help me fix this problem. I want the iterator to reflect the newly entered values without having to tab out of the row.

    Marvin,
    I would suggest starting to debug your new CT in the following order
    1) ABAP - run directly in SAP to confirm you are getting the data you expect
    2) Set breakpoints in ABAP and confirm your transmit is calling into your ABAP as expected
    3) Java - Add breakpoints and step through your Java class to confirm it is getting back the data as expected
    4) ATE - Look at the CT in the ATE to view the contents
    --Bill

  • PO Output for Communication :: Modified XSL-FO not reflecting

    Hi,
    As per the requirement we need to add some fields in the PO Output for Communication report.
    I have modified the Standard PO XSL-FO and I am able to see the changes in the first page but the changes are not reflecting in the remaining pages. I have verified that the remaining pages also haivng Standard PO only.
    Kindly help!!!
    Thanks in advance.
    Edited by: AppsDeveloper on Nov 28, 2011 1:03 PM

    Any help will appreciable..!!!

  • Changes are not reflecting using af:resource for adding CSS

    Hi,
    I am trying to add new CSS file(say the name as customNew.css) to page template using af:resource tag, the changes are not reflected. Instead I see(using firebug) that, styles coming from different CSS file(say the name as customOld.css ) which configured on trinidad-config.xml and trinidad-skins.xml files.
    I was under the impression that, the new CSS file(customNew.css) will override the old css (customOld.css). So, CSS added using af:resource tag will not override any other CSS ???
    Any help will be appreciated
    Thanks,
    San.

    Hi,
    if you bring CSS to the browser through af:resource then this is not overriding any skinning definition. Skins can only changed in trinidad-config.xml file (which also can be done at runtime). Just adding a CSS file to af:resource wont do the trick here.
    Frank

  • The logo for the application has been changed in Azure portal, but it's not reflected during the login

    Hi Azure support,
    my name is Linda, Office365 technical support. I want to ask one Azure question on behalf on my customer. she has AAD_basic subscription.
    she tried to change logo of one application, but failed. she followed the steps as below:
    1. add the "Logo" in the application;
    2. logo not reflect in the login page.
    I cannot attach the screenshot, if you want, you could email me v-linsha
    hope you could give some suggestion and resolution. thank you.

    Sometimes I know I haven't changed anything in the external file. In this case, the supposed conflict seems to be a bug and I overwrite with Lightroom metadata without exception (but with fingers crossed) - that bug has been reported.
    Other times however, I have edited the file in an external editor, and its possible that the external editor wants to add some information that may be worth having, or it may be that its lost the original information - this is when its a dilemma:
    If I overwrite disk file with Lightroom metadata, I may be losing what the external editor added.
    If I overwrite Lightroom metadata with disk data, I may be losing what Lightroom had and the external editor dropped.
    This scenario has not been reported as a bug, since I don't know if it is one. If I could see the difference between the two, then I'd know.
    Rob

  • Freight Cost not reflecting in MIRO for Return PO

    HI MM Experts,
    In standard Return Process we used to enter all the freight charges + base Price in the base Price only but we have a requirement where we have to show these freight charges (-100 INR) seperately other than base Price (-1000 INR) and the net price must appear as -1100 INR in PO.
    I have a business scenario in hand where in Return PO different condition types like Insurance, Octroi and Freight cost are not reflecting while creating Credit Memo in MIRO.
    I have created different condition types as mentioned above and Condition category as "F- Freight" is used and also used a routine 164 in Calculation type  in Schema against these conditions to make the conditions negative (to make sure that all the above mentioned conditions must be added in base Price in PO).
    In PO, all conditions are reflecting correctly and adding to the base Price. In GR also Return accounting is also happening correctly but in MIRO when i am trying to make credit memo then system only showing base price and taxes it is not reflecting other condition types (Insurance, Octroi and Freight ) in MIRO.
    If anyone have any idea how to get these freight cost, insurance and octroi cost in MIRO then please reveret back.
    Regards,
    Neeraj

    Hi Neeraj,
    Before to answer this, once you are in MIRO, into the "PO reference" tab, do you have selected the option: 3 Good/services items + planned delivery costs?
    This option is in the top on this tab in the right side.
    Please, let me know your feedback.
    Kind regards,
    Sandra

  • Pension not calculated when EE is hired mid-month

    Hi All
    Please suggest for the following....
    When an Employee is hired in the middle of the month, the system doesn't calculate Pension Contribution.
    Like if an EE is hired on 10th April. The system will calculate all payments & deductions, but it is not calculating the Pension Contributions.
    I am maintaining IT 169, 171 for Pension Contribution.
    The problem I found behind this is.....(WIth the help of an ABAPer)
    -: System checks the Payroll Period Start Date with the Org. Assignment start date. When it doesnu2019t match, the system does not calculate the Pension Contribution.
    For the time being I solved this through the following action -: In debugging, I canceled this condition (skipped this check). Then it calculated the Pension Contribution.
    But, this is not the right solution for achieving that as we are changing standard SAP coding.
    Please suggest any solution for the same.
    Thanks & Regards

    If your schema has p0169 with BEG that will happen, try put below Param1 which fits your requirement.
    BEG                                                                               
    Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll period begin date.        
    No changes within the current payroll period are taken into             
    consideration.                                                          
    No proration of contributions takes place, even if the record ends      
    within the current payroll period.                                                                               
    END                                                                               
    Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll period end date.          
    No changes within the current payroll period are taken into             
    consideration.                                                          
    No proration of contributions takes place, even if the record begins    
    within the current payroll period.                                                                               
    CHK                                                                               
    Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll check date (the pay date),
    regardless of whether the check date falls into the payroll period      
    itself.                                                                 
    A record whose validity starts after the end date of the current payroll
    period is still evaluated if the check date (which lies in the future)  
    falls within the validity period of the infotype.                                                                               
    FRST                                                                               
    Infotype records are evaluated if there is any intersection of plan     
    infotype and payroll period. The first intersection is taken to         
    determine the full period deduction amount which is stored without      
    proration.                                                                               
    LAST                                                                               
    Infotype records are evaluated if there is any intersection of plan     
    infotype and payroll period. The last intersection is taken to determine
    the full period deduction amount which is stored without proration.

Maybe you are looking for