Error 22A8 "Error requires full development system to be fixed"

Hello, I have successfully built my application with the application builder. The application is a plug-in architecture where I have paths to different .lvclass files internally in the .exe file which I have set to "always included" in the build. The different classes will be loaded dynamically
When I run the executable on my development machine it start up and everything works fine. But when I want to run in on another machine with only the LV runtime installed I get the following error:
Error 22A8 "Error requires full development system to be fixed"
How is that? anyone know what that mean? I don't find much information about this when I search on the internet so i'm kinda stuck now. Im using LV 2011 sp1.
Best regards
Thomas

Hi,
What is the runtime engine that you installed in the other computer? Does that computer have any LabVIEW installed as well?
May i have a screenshot of that error code again? I don't think the is such an error link error 22A8. 
If you want to create an application (.exe) which is to be run on a computer that does not have any NI software installed. I suggest that you create an installer not an executable. You can build an installer using application builder. What it does is that it includes not only runtime engine but also other addons which is required due to the toolkits you may have used in your code. 
You can learn about creating installers here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_NsSOVx3wc
If the error still comes out, you can refer to the other discussions with the similar error message as yours:
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/F715F1ED66878F8E862574F8006AD6A1
http://www.ni.com/white-paper/13164/en/#212136_by_Category
http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/A-full-development-version-of-labview-required-to-fix-the-errors/m-p...
Warmest regards,
Lennard.C
Learning new things everyday...

Similar Messages

  • Labview Full Developement System 8.2 on Windows 7

    Hi there,
    I have a question about the compatibility of Labview Full Developement System 8.2 and Windows 7.
    Is it possible to run this system without problems on a PC that is using Windows 7?
    I am also using the Labview DSC module (version 8.2.1).
    I'm just wondering if I will get problems when I am going to run programs that I made, in Windows 7.
    Or is there a new version of Labview that is compatible with Windows 7?
    If so, is it possible to use older versions of Labview in this new version (bij transfering the files).
    I hope to hear soon from some of you.
    Regards,
    Kenny

    LabVIEW 2009 is the first LabVIEW version officially compatible with Windows 7 (see also)
    Quote: Starting with 6.0.2, LabVIEW should run on newer, unlisted versions of Windows without error messages, but these are not officially supported.
    (However, I was able to run LabVIEW 8.2 just fine under windows 7 64 bit. I don't know if there are potential DSC issues. Another option is the windows XP compatibility mode virtual PC available for some version of Windows 7).
    LabVIEW 2009 and 2010 are fully compatible with Windows 7. You should be able to open your LabVIEW 8.2 files fin in any newer version. For details, have a look at the LabVIEW version compatibility matrix.
    LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

  • Signal Express not activated with Labview Full Development System Volume License

    I'm using a volume license manager to generate license for disconnected machines.  I just upgraded to Labview 2009.  The license files work for labview but are not working for signal express.  I have the Labview full development system which included signal express in the past.  Both labview and signal express work fine on my computer that also has the volume licensing manager software installed.   This computer is connected to the license server.  I need to get signal express activated on my disconnected machines. 

    LabVIEW Full Development licenses still include Signal Express. Are you saying that whenever you are connected to the server you can run Signal Express just fine, but whenever you create a disconnected license Signal Express is not able to launch? Can you verify that you are, in fact, checking a license out from the server whenever you are connected to the network?
    If you still have trouble I would recommend calling NI support so we could get more informatioin (such as your license file, contract ID, etc).

  • How to download LabVIEW Full Development System 7.1 and tool kit

    I want to get the "LabVIEW Full Development System 7.1 and tool kit", Where Can I download it from?
    TIA

    LabVIEW 7.1 is ancient, LabVIEW 2011 is current. There is more than one "toolkit". What did you have in mind, exactly?
    You can donwload an evaluation version of LabVIEW 2011 from here. Is there any specific reason you want to use 7.1?
    If you have a valid license for LabVIEW 2011 you should be able to use it also for older versions. Contact your local NI representative. Are you on SSP?
    LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

  • LabVIEW Full Development System 7.1 and tool kit

    hello, i am confusing about the LabVIEW Full Development System 7.1 product.
    what is thats means? any different of standard Ni LabVIEW 7.1. Is the full development system is already includes a tool kit.
    i want to open an example file from this page...(http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/epd/p/id/5146) , i am using LabVIEW 7.1 student edition. It say file not found...( http://forums.ni.com/attachments/ni/170/292574/1/file%20not%20found.JPG)
    and also i would like to know about the tool kit from this page...(http://sine.ni.com/nips/cds/view/p/lang/en/nid/12855)
    is this the reason why the file not found when i open the am_modulation.vi because i don't have this product? thanks
    zull azym
    research assistant
    Tun Hussein Onn University of Malaysia

    I have found your original question and the attached VI.
    am_modulation.vi you have attached was saved in LV 8.0. You do not need the modulation toolkit to open the VI. I redownloded the VI from the NI web page and it was stored in LV 8.0 too. I made a comment on this on the page.
    I have attached the converted VI.
    Waldemar
    Using 7.1.1, 8.5.1, 8.6.1, 2009 on XP and RT
    Don't forget to give Kudos to good answers and/or questions
    Attachments:
    am_modulation.zip ‏2535 KB

  • Memory Footprint for LabVIEW 7.1 Full Development System

    Hello,
             I would like to know the memory footprint for LabVIEW 7.1 Full Development System.Both during the installtion and for developing applications later.
    Can someone help.Thank you.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    There isn't a single answer for that, as this varies considerably.
    As far as disk space goes, if memory serves, the basic 7.x takes up a few hundred MB, but that could inflate considerably depending on which modules and drivers you add to it.
    For RAM, I believe 7.0 used to take up ~20-50 MB immediately after being loaded, but that number would then also change a lot over time depending on what you do. Loading, editing and running code all regularly change the amount of RAM used.
    Why are you asking? Also, are you aware that 7.1 is relatively old by now (came out 7 years ago)?
    Try to take over the world!

  • Recherche Labview Full Development System 8.2

    Bonjour,
    Je suis a la recherche de la version 8.2 de Labview Full Development System.
    Quelqu'un peut-il m'indiquer ou la telecharger ?
    Je ne parviens pas a la trouver sur le site de NI (version trop ancienne).
    En vous remerciant par avance.
    Bien cordialement.
    J. C. Quantin

    Pour la version de LabVIEW : http://www.ni.com/download/labview-development-system-8.2/3576/en/

  • Using full development system on customized test setup that normally uses run-time - How to do?

    I have 8.2 Full Development System (2 copies as there are two of us  who write code).
    I develop testing systems, each on an individual computer, each customized with a custom built (by me) interface to test and measure perfomance of motors produced on the production line.
    In order to modify the program and test it, I have to replace the production set-up computer with my developmental computer, make the changes (and check that they work) and then make the run-time version for the production computer.  THEN switch computers.  Since I have nearly a dozen different setups, I cannot just make two production test sets of each (one for development and one for production).
    Is there an easier way? 
    Perhaps with HDD in a drawer?  But then I'd have driver and version issues.
    Is it possible to run the full development system remotely (from the production setup)?
    What about a site-license?
    Thanks,
    Tim K

    From the 8.2 Release Notes:
    Single-Seat and Multi-Seat Licensing
    LabVIEW supports both single-seat and multi-seat licenses. Single-seat
    licensing is the use of LabVIEW on up to three computers but by only one
    user. Multi-seat, or volume, licensing is the use of LabVIEW on several
    computers or by several users. Each seat using LabVIEW must have a valid
    license from a license server. Refer to the National Instruments Web site at
    ni.com/license for more information.
    You are permitted to install LabVIEW on the the pc with the hardware, do the changes and debug, and re-build the app for production.

  • Error message:" labview 7.1 development system has encountunered an error"

    sir,
    I had written program which had compiled earlier successfully, now i had improved the program for having some external diaplay by including sub vi 's consisting of DIO lines, the program when compiled now is shutting down abruptly giving a message " Labview 7.1 development system had encountered a problem and windows  is shutting it down" . I have checked the program again by removing that sub vi's of DIO lines and again its getting compiled. I will be very thankful if u could help me to solve this problem.
    vamsi

    This post is a duplicate. Please follow replies here.
    -thanks-
    Travis M
    LabVIEW R&D
    National Instruments

  • "VI has error of type 1002288.The full development version of LabVIEW is required to fix the errors"

    Hi,
    I had created an executable in LabVIEW 8.6 on a windows XP 32 bit PC. The application uses some Vision VIs. The executable runs in most of the PCs except one. the PC is a windows 7 64bit. Initially i got the error "Labview Load error code 3: could not load front panel". I fixed this by changing the source file settings in the application builder. Now i am getting the error "VI has error of type 1002288.The full development version of LabVIEW is required to fix the errors" and the exe shows a broken run button.
    But if i build the exe in the same PC i get no errors and it works fine. Moreover i have tested this exe in a different PC with the same configuration, it works there. I have tried reinstalling labview in the PC the problem still persists.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Hi Rajshekar.
    > Which version of LabVIEW are you using on PC with Win7 64bit? would like to check if there are any issues with LV2009 32bit on 64bit OS..
          - The version of Labview on the win7 64bit PC is also lv8.6 full development system.
    > Do you get the same error on the other PC with same config(Win7) when running the .exe generated using LV 8.6 on WinXP 32bit? just to make sure the problem is with OS or LV..
          - the same problem occured at one more PC with the same configuration. but when i tested in an another PC of the same config it worked i am not able to isolate and decide that the error is based on one particular PC config.
    I have listed the environments in which application ran and how the application was put in to the PC.
    I would also like you to know that i have created an installer for the exe. I am also using NI vision in my application and this is the error "An error occured loading VI 'IMAQ GetImagePixelPtr'. LabVIEW load error code 3: could not load front panel"....and rest is what i said in my previous post
    1. Use the installer to install the application.
    2. just copy the exe created in LV 8.6 into a PC that already has LV development system installed in it
    3. The PCs might either be a blank one with no history of LV installed in them
    4. The PCs might have diffrent versions of LV development systems installed in them (8.2,8.5,8.6,2009)
    All PCs that have LV development system(s) installed in them, was able to run the application except the one with win7 64, where i have tried uninstalling all NI software and use only the installer to install, install LV 8.6 full development system and try runnning the exe, nothing works.
    Thanks

  • ADFDi  Error : The remote server returned an error: (411) Length Required

    JDeveloper version 11.1.2.1.0
    weblogic Version 10.3.5.0
    Hi All,
    From ADF Desktop integration application, When the user key in username and password the system show the following error message. Please help to me how to tackle it as well as useful blogs.
    Regards
    KT
    Error Detail:
    WebException: The remote server returned an error: (411) Length Required.
    Source: System
    Stack:
    at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.GetResponse()
    at oracle.adf.client.windows.common.internet.http.ManagedHttpResponse..ctor(HttpWebRequest request)
    at oracle.adf.client.windows.common.internet.http.ManagedHttpRequest.GetResponse()
    at oracle.adf.client.windows.datamanager.servletrequest.SyncRequest.BeginResponse()
    at oracle.adf.client.windows.datamanager.servletrequest.TamperCheckRequest.InternalCallSyncServlet()
    at oracle.adf.client.windows.datamanager.servletrequest.SyncServletRequest.CallSyncServlet(Boolean retry)
    at oracle.adf.client.windows.datamanager.ADFBindingContext.SendSyncServletRequest(SyncServletRequest request)
    at oracle.adf.client.windows.datamanager.ADFBindingContext.CheckForTampering()
    at oracle.adf.client.windows.datamanager.ADFBindingContext.PreSyncServletTamperCheck()
    at oracle.adf.client.windows.datamanager.ADFBindingContext.SyncModel(BindingContainer bc, String contentType)
    at oracle.adf.client.windows.datamanager.BindingContainer.Repopulate()
    at oracle.adf.client.windows.datamanager.BindingContainer.SyncModel(Boolean forceSync)
    at oracle.adf.client.windows.excel.runtime.uicomponent.RTActionCollection.DoInvoke(RTColumnCollection parent, String contextLabel)

    In which environment is your application hosted? Are there any other network components sitting between the client and the application, such as CDN or load balancer?
    It would be very helpful if you can capture the client-side HTTP traffic using some tools (e.g. Fiddler - http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler2/), so that we can know where the "401 length required" error is sent from by looking at the header of the HTTP response of the error.

  • Full production refresh to development systems and Charm?

    Hi SDN Community,
      Where I work we have a policy of refreshing the development systems (ECC, CRM, APO, BI, SRM) on an annual basis with full production system data, HR data is subsequently wiped clean from the development system. 
    For each of our systems we have a development system, a QA system and a production system.
    The decision to do these full refreshes was taken to ensure that developers and configurers can do decent testing in the Dev environments - prior to transporting to our QA system - to ensure that we have a reasonably stable QA system. Prior to the refreshes - QA was considered too unstable by our business to be used as a good test platform - the full D refreshes solved this problem.
    We have recently installed SAP Charm (Change request management) which is a solution manager based product that manages the transportation of objects in change requests - attached to maintenance cycles.
    During our first development system refresh we discovered that all open Charm projects (maintenance cycles) were placed into an unuseable status due to the refresh. This means we had to rebuild all of the Charm projects after the refresh - which took a considerable amount of time + resources and delayed project work. We don't want to be in this situation again for our next refresh.
    SAPs response to us has been that they have no other customer that does full Development system refreshes - and also has Charm. I wonder if this is accurate, I think what SAP are saying is that they don't have many Charm customers... Is refreshing Development so uncommon?
    We are considering products like SAPs TDMS - and alternatives (eg gold client) - but most of these appear a little immature - for refreshing complex system landscapes - such as ours and keeping everything in synch after the refresh.
    My questions to SDN -
    What do you do - do you do full refreshes to your D systems?
    If not - what are the arguments against refreshing D systems (is this considered bad practice)?
    Are there any other Charm customers out there in a similar situation to us?
    How do you manage the stability of your QA environments and stop the transport into QA systems of untested changes - if your D systems are not similar to you production system
    (note we have some 300 active users in just our ECC development system)?
    Any suggestions / recommendations as to how to best proceed would be greatly appreciated.
    many thanks in advance,
    Julian Phillips
    Edited by: Julian Phillips on Nov 11, 2008 2:33 PM

    Thanks Naushad for your reply,
      I wonder if D refreshes are less common - more due to the additional hardware costs incurred (disk space needed to store full production data is usually pretty large) to do them - than due to avoiding disrupting development - probably a bit of both.
      I did not mention this - but in our refresh we do reimport all transports that we open prior to the refresh - which used to solve our problems - in terms of restoring active changes - but with SAPs Charm system - this approach does not work as the Charm projects are left in an inconsistent status.
    We are now leaning towards introducing a 4th set of systems into our landscape - so that we have the following platforms:
    Development --->  Pre QA  ---> QA  ---> Production
    This approach will allow us to keep both the Pre QA and QA systems refreshed every 6 months or so - and our new Dev system - we will refresh very infrequently (every 5 years perhaps) if at all. We will tie the Charm system to our new development - and this system will then not be impacted by refreshes. This approach means additional hardware cost - but as it happens we have a few spare boxes - so this maybe our best bet.
    The core reason for our refresh is so that we will be able to preserve the stability of our QA test platform - which for us is the critical factor here. If QA has poorly tested work in it - we run a higher risk of disrupting other testing and also of this poorly tested work reaching production.
    When we used to have a development system as you described and just the single QA box - we experienced frequent instability in our QA box - due to poorly tested working reaching it - and this delayed numerous projects.
    Does anyone else have a 4 box setup like this? Anyone else encountered this on an SAP project anywhere? Pros / Cons of this approach?
    //Julian
    Edited by: Julian Phillips on Nov 12, 2008 8:08 AM
    Edited by: Julian Phillips on Nov 12, 2008 8:18 AM

  • Error in error code database

    Hi,
    I have this error (screenshot provided), which problem is its asking for a password. I think this vi is ni developed. So, I have tried to reinstall labview but still this cannot work. Thanks, for any help.
    Best regards,
    Edwin
    Attachments:
    error_code_database_password.zip ‏52 KB

    Hi Edwin,
    The error is most likely caused by opening an LLB in a newer version of LabVIEW
    than the version it was developed on. It is commonly seen with the "Error
    Code Database.vi" when upgrading from LabVIEW 6.x to 7.x, if the original
    main VI using the "Simple Error Handler.vi" and it was saved in
    an LLB including the VI.LIB files ("File » Save with Options... » Include
    vi.lib files"). To fix the issue, make sure to use the VI.LIB files (VIs) from the current development system on the machine.
    You can replace for example the "Simple Error Handler.vi" by
    right-clicking it on the block diagram, choose "Replace" and then
    browse to the "Simple Error Handler.vi" in the palette.
    Please refer to the following KnowledgeBase about this error:
    My Copy of the Error Code Database VI from LabVIEW 6.1 Does Not
    Work in LabVIEW 7.0
    To not run into this error again in the future, do not save the VI.LIB with the
    VI, unless you are distributing to a system without the same VI.LIB files
    available (e.g. from Full Development system to Base Package).
    Let me know if you get it to work, thanks.
    Have fun!
    - Philip Courtois, Thinkbot Solutions

  • Should my 7.1 full dev. system have Application Builder? I can't find it.

    Hi NI,
    I am interested in building a LabVIEW dll, and note that this requires Application Builder. Apparently this is included with the Professional Development System; my CD says LabVIEW 7 Express Full Development System Windows 2000/NT/XP, so should I be able to install the tool? If not, how do I obtain it?
    Thanks in advance,
    mallicos

    Full Development is not the same as Professional Development. Only the Pro version includes the app builder. You can upgrade to the pro version or you can buy the app builder separately. Either can be done from http://www.ni.com.

  • I recieve the following error when running an executable ("This VI is not Executable. The full development version of Labview is required to fix the errors"

    I recieve the following error when trying to build and run a labview executable. I am able to build the executable but when trying to run the executable, a pop up window comes up asking the user to select a dll. (please see screen shot attached). Once the DLL is selected, I get the error that This VI is not Executable. The full development version of Labview is required to fix the errors. (please see screen shot attached). I have also attached a snapshot of the project window.
    I have the professional development system
    I can run the main VI
    all the required DLL's are in the dependencies section of the project window.
    I am trying to find the root cause of this error but to no avail. can anyone give me a clue to what i am missing here. Any suggestions on where i should look to find the problem ?
    Thanks in advance to all labview users for your help
    Attachments:
    project window.PNG ‏36 KB

    other PNG
    Attachments:
    Broken Arrow on EXE.PNG ‏179 KB

Maybe you are looking for

  • Will upgrade help me?

    Background: I currently have more photos than hard drive space. After modifying, printing, etc my photos I have been then burning them to disk and erasing them from the iphoto library to make room for new pictures. I have an external hard drive but n

  • Openitem management

    Hi Gurus, I have one GL a/c which s a balance sheet ac and I made postings to this GL ac.Now I want to activate Openitem Management functionality on this a/c. While changing this GL a/c to put OpenitemManagement check,it is not allowing me to save.It

  • How to copy a future object in java ???

    here is a part of class Hand for a blackjack game. I want to make a copy of a future Hand object using constructor copyHand(), I dont know how ???????? I appreciate anyones help ..... // the array of cards in the hand     Card [] cards;      * Builds

  • Cost of Service Question

    Hi, I just got a new iPhone 3gs yesterday, and I'm happy to have it. It replaced my previous phone, the original-release iPhone. But I have a question.... When I signed up for the phone, delivered to my door, I was given options for services. I chose

  • Think Centre M92z factory restore discs

    Just purchased my first Lenovo product. Question is: Although the C: backup partition appears to contains the factory restore data, can I simply restore to factory, if needed, from these files or do I need to create backup media (discs) from this par