Error adding static route
I'm trying to add two routes 192.168.201.0/24 & 192.168.202.0/24 (Gateway on both is 192.168.210.200) on a WRT54G v8 that is on 192.168.210.0/24 I get May be default route already exists What's the deal on this?
This was a replacement router of the same model, firmware version may be different, but the previous router had both routes.
Her is the current route table. I'm sorry I just don't see it.
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 75.23.215.254 WAN (Internet)
75.23.209.79 255.255.255.255 75.23.209.79 WAN (Internet)
75.23.215.254 255.255.255.255 75.23.215.254 WAN (Internet)
192.168.210.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.210.1 LAN & Wireless
Regards,
Kevin
So it appears that there is no option to lock down access to the shell now that the command that you used to use is no longer valid. What is worse is that there isn't an option to create an ACL in the shell that you could attach to the interface. So I would recommend that you create a defect with Cisco TAC and get this re-added or request that ACL functionality is added.
For the GUI (in case you were not already aware of this), you can restrict access from Administration > Admin Access > Settings > Access > IP Access
Similar Messages
-
Adding Static Routes for VLANS
We have 3 servers each in a different vlan and 1 server is a Bordermanager.
We added network routes to 2 server and all the vlans can see them, the
Bordermanager already has a default route that takes it out on the
internet, when we try to add a private network number of the vlans, it does
not see the other vlans. What is the correct way to do this or is there?
Thank you...Ok Craig,
There are only 2 vlans, VLAN1 has all the servers, VLAN2 has all the users,
a Cisco router supposedly does the routing between both VLANS because the
router protocol supports ISL. Rip has been removed from the servers. The
Bordermanager Server is in VLAN1, the problem is that all the servers you
can change the Static Route to the VLAN2 that has all the users, but the
Border cannot because it's static route goes out to the internet and it
doesn't let you make a change, would a 3 card in the Border help? Thanxs...
> In article <Mfc4e.1881$[email protected]>, wrote:
> > when we try to add a private network number of the vlans, it does
> > not see the other vlans. What is the correct way to do this or is there?
> >
> Can you give more details?
>
> Somewhere there has to be a router that contains all of the VLANS in order
> to route between them. (Or a pair of routers each with 2 of the VLANS).
> This could be a server or a routing module in your VLAN box.
>
> The BMgr server would need a static route pointing to the router(s)
> connecting the VLANS.
>
> Craig Johnson
> Novell Support Connection SysOp
> *** For a current patch list, tips, handy files and books on
> BorderManager, go to http://www.craigjconsulting.com ***
> -
Adding static route on OSX server 10.4.3
Hi,
In the past one was able to add the following command to the Network file to set-up a permanent route.
route add -net <network> <router>
The Network folder in StartUp Items no longer exists where is the best place to add this now.
regards,
PaddyNot necessarily, Polar. There are many cases where you need to control routing at a host level, not just at the router level.
For example, assume your system was dual-homed (has two active ethernet connections) using 192.168.1.x on en0 and 10.1.1.x on en1, with 192.168.1.1 (en0) as your default route.
Now assume that the router at 10.1.1.1 on the en1 network acts as a gateway to the 10.2.2.x subnet. You need to tell your machine to route 10.2.2.x through 10.1.1.1. Default routing won't do this - the system will send all non-local traffic to 192.168.1.1. Unless 192.168.1.1 also has a path to 10.2.2.x, that traffic isn't going to go anywhere, and putting a link between the public router and the 10.2.2.x network might be a security risk.
Therefore the solution is to tell your machine to route 10.2.2.x through the 10.1.1.1 router via a static route on the host. -
Network Errors Adding New Router
Hello,
I posted this in the iChat forum earlier today but I think this would a better forum to ask this question. We were using a D-Link DI-604 Wired Router for about 5 years until yesterday when we purchased a new D-Link EBR-2310 Wired Router. Ever since connecting the new router, about every 15 to 30 minutes in the console log on my iMac 3.06 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, I get the following errors now:
Jun 12 17:31:57 <computer name> kernel[0]: AppleYukon2: 00000001,00000000 sk98nif - deadmanCheck - nothing received, resetting chip
Jun 12 17:31:57 <computer name> configd[14]: AppleTalk shutdown
Jun 12 17:31:59 <computer name> configd[14]: AppleTalk shutdown complete
Jun 12 17:32:01 <computer name> kernel[0]: AppleYukon2: error - Link Partner not Auto-Neg. able
Jun 12 17:32:01 <computer name> configd[14]: AppleTalk startup
Jun 12 17:32:01 <computer name> kernel[0]: AppleYukon2: 00000000,00000000 skgehw - cppSkDrvEvent - SKDRV_LIPA_NOT_ANABLE: link partner not auto-negotiate capable, port, phy r6
Jun 12 17:32:01 <computer name> kernel[0]: Ethernet [AppleYukon2]: Link up on en0, 10-Megabit, Half-duplex, No flow-control, Debug [796d,0c08,0de1,0200,0021,0000]
Jun 12 17:32:07 <computer name> configd[14]: AppleTalk startup complete
This never happened with the old router and I can't figure out what is causing this (I keep a close watch on my console log and I know for sure that this problem just started since connecting the new router). The new router is cascaded to an older Farallon 10Mbps ethernet hub (exactly the same way the old router was set up) so at first, I thought the errors may have been due to the fact that I had the WAN Port Speed of the new router set to "Auto 10/100Mbps" causing my iMac to (unsuccessfully) try to negotiate a faster port speed. On the old router, we had the WAN Port Speed set to 10Mbps and I never noticed any of these errors so I changed the WAN Port Speed on the new router to 10Mbps instead of "Auto 10/100Mbps" and we're still getting the same thing happening.
I've tried connecting my iMac directly to the router and directly to the cascaded Farallon 10Mbps ethernet hub and either way, it makes no difference. Our internet connection works fine but we get the odd error when sending a print job to our networked HP LaserJet with the new router. Does anyone with any networking experience have any idea what can be causing this? Is there a way to change the 10/100Mbps speed on the iMac itself rather than on the router?
Thanks so much,
GerardIs there a way to change the 10/100Mbps speed on the iMac itself rather than on the router?
System Preferences/Network/Advanced/Ethernet - Configure manually
The book on this router at Newegg is that it works for some people, but others using Vista notice the router can't handle multiple users very well. Disconnects, slow throughput, resets. It's not a very costly router, and hasn't had a firmware update since 2007. Maybe Vista pushes it too hard?
I'm just guessing that the deadmanCheck reference in the error is some sort of test to see if anybody is there and when the router doesn't respond, the Mac reset's it's ethernet chips.
Since you've had so many problems with the programs, firewall and port routing, and incomprehensible tech support, you might look at one of the competitors products that can keep up with your equipment. -
ISE version 1.3 and static route not working
This command works without any issues with ISE version 1.1 and 1.2:
ip route 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.255 gateway 127.0.0.1
However, it does NOT work in ISE version 1.3. See below:
ciscoisedev/admin(config)# ip route 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.255 gateway 127.0.0.1
% Warning: Could not find outgoing interface for gateway 127.0.0.1 while trying to add the route.
% Error: Error adding static route.
ciscoisedev/admin(config)#
Any ideas anyone?So it appears that there is no option to lock down access to the shell now that the command that you used to use is no longer valid. What is worse is that there isn't an option to create an ACL in the shell that you could attach to the interface. So I would recommend that you create a defect with Cisco TAC and get this re-added or request that ACL functionality is added.
For the GUI (in case you were not already aware of this), you can restrict access from Administration > Admin Access > Settings > Access > IP Access -
Simple Load Sharing With Static Routes
The scenario given below, L3 switch connected to 2 local LAN routers which in turn connected to internet router.
I would like to distribute the internet traffic from local LAN(L3 switch) on both RTRA and RTRB by adding static routes on L3 switch. How can I achieve this without configuring the routing protocol.
---------------RTRA----
L3SWITCH-------RTRB----INTERNET-RTRHi
If its simple internet traffic do keep in mind about the local NAT commands which has to be configured accordingly with route-maps here.
If you are having your own block of ip address space then better to run bgp between the providers.
regds -
Hello,
I set up a network (192.168.1.0), with a wrt160n router. I want to create a second network (192.168.2.0) and use the router to set up a static route between the two networks. Whenever I try to set up a static route and save the settings I get the error "invalid static route", although I think I use the correct data:
destination lan ip: 192.168.2.0
subnet mask: 255.255.255.0
Gateway: 192.168.2.1 (static ip of the router in the second nw)
interface: lan & wireless
I already did an upgrade of the firmware but to no avail.
Anybody any ideas?
Best regards,
ChristopheAre you setting the first network with 192.168.1.0 or 192.168.0.1....?
Make the first network at 192.168.0.1 and second at 192.168.0.2.Follow this link for Static Routing. -
What is the Right Form of OSX 10.8 's Static Route Grammars
I am not good at mac os code. so i have some questions about route grammar.
eg:
I need add a static route for a IP,
just like:sudo route -nv add -net 10.0.0.0 192.168.42.254
i input it in termina,then it worked. But when i restart mac. the route did not exist.
so where is not right form about the "sudo route -nv add -net 10.0.0.0 192.168.42.254"?
who can tell me more about How to add STATIC ROUTE in mac os? waiting on line.guys help me.Defining a persistent static route on Mac OS X - Server Fault
Adding static routes to a network - Mac OS X Hints
RouteSplit
Setting a static route every boot with launchd - Ask Different -
We have a VSS based on 2x WS-C4500X-16., The VSS is used as Layer 2 Switch for diffrents Vlan in our DC.
After making the VSS as a Layer 3 gateway for our production VLAN and added 2 routes for routing purposes, we encountered a network down time with high CPU in the VSS and a huges log messages :
.May 14 12:11:25.947: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.7.22 Vlan100
.May 14 12:11:34.516: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.7.22 Vlan100
.May 14 12:11:40.072: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.1.1.254 Vlan100
.May 14 12:11:49.682: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.1.253 Vlan100
.May 14 12:11:55.079: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.1.1.254 Vlan100
.May 14 12:12:00.926: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.7.40 Vlan100
.May 14 12:12:06.701: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.8.32 Vlan100
.May 14 12:12:12.624: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.7.40 Vlan100
.May 14 12:12:21.627: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.7.40 Vlan100
.May 14 12:12:32.261: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.8.32 Vlan100
.May 14 12:12:41.801: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.2.105 Vlan100
.May 14 12:12:49.633: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.1.253 Vlan100
.May 14 12:12:54.831: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.1.1.254 Vlan100
.May 14 12:12:59.960: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.1.1.254 Vlan100
.May 14 12:13:08.745: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.1.253 Vlan100
.May 14 12:13:16.138: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.1.253 Vlan100
.May 14 12:13:22.393: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.1.253 Vlan100
.May 14 12:13:31.415: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.1.141 Vlan100
.May 14 12:13:38.944: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.2.215 Vlan100
.May 14 12:13:45.972: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.1.253 Vlan100
Bellow are the show version of our VSS,
Cisco IOS Software, IOS-XE Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500e-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 03.04.00.SG RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2012 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Wed 05-Dec-12 04:38 by prod_rel_team
ROM: 15.0(1r)SG10
S_C4500X_01 uptime is 33 weeks, 1 day, 14 minutes
Uptime for this control processor is 33 weeks, 1 day, 16 minutes
System returned to ROM by power-on
System restarted at 11:59:10 UTC Tue Sep 24 2013
Running default software
Jawa Revision 2, Winter Revision 0x0.0x40
Last reload reason: power-on
License Information for 'WS-C4500X-16'
License Level: ipbase Type: Permanent
Next reboot license Level: ipbase
cisco WS-C4500X-16 (MPC8572) processor (revision 9) with 4194304K/20480K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID JAE173303CF
MPC8572 CPU at 1.5GHz, Cisco Catalyst 4500X
Last reset from PowerUp
4 Virtual Ethernet interfaces
32 Ten Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
511K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
Configuration register is 0x2101
Can you help please,Hi,
thanks for your reply, but there is no hsrp configured, just an interface vlan. with 2 static routes and the problem was there for more than an hour before we decided to rollback.
Is there a BugId with this problem in Cisco DataBase.
here is a show ip route
S_C4500X_01# show ip route
Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, H - NHRP, l - LISP
+ - replicated route, % - next hop override
Gateway of last resort is 10.2.1.253 to network 0.0.0.0
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 10.2.1.253
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 10.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, Vlan100
L 10.1.1.250/32 is directly connected, Vlan100
172.31.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 172.31.0.0/16 is directly connected, Vlan120
L 172.31.0.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan120
S 192.1.0.0/16 [1/0] via 10.1.1.254
and the show ip cef:
_C4500X_01# show ip cef
.May 14 12:13:57.859: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.1.158 Vlan100 f
Prefix Next Hop Interface
0.0.0.0/0 10.2.1.253 Vlan100
0.0.0.0/8 drop
0.0.0.0/32 receive
10.0.0.0/8 attached Vlan100
10.0.0.0/32 receive Vlan100
10.1.1.6/32 attached Vlan100
10.1.1.17/32 attached Vlan100
10.1.1.40/32 attached Vlan100
10.1.1.41/32 attached Vlan100
10.1.1.50/32 attached Vlan100
10.1.1.60/32 attached Vlan100
10.1.1.99/32 attached Vlan100
10.1.1.121/32 attached Vlan100
10.1.1.122/32 attached Vlan100
10.1.1.124/32 attached Vlan100
10.1.1.125/32 attached Vlan100
10.1.1.126/32 attached Vlan100
10.1.1.225/32 attached Vlan100
10.1.1.227/32 attached Vlan100
10.1.1.250/32 receive Vlan100
10.1.1.254/32 10.1.1.254 Vlan100
10.2.1.3/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.4/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.6/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.8/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.9/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.18/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.23/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.24/32 attached Vlan100
Prefix Next Hop Interface
10.2.1.26/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.28/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.29/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.31/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.103/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.108/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.109/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.124/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.129/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.137/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.139/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.143/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.144/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.159/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.167/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.174/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.175/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.176/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.1.181/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.4.38/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.4.39/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.4.43/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.4.47/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.4.51/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.4.63/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.4.65/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.4.69/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.4.71/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.4.73/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.4.102/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.4.106/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.4.107/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.4.113/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.4.116/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.4.119/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.4.120/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.4.122/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.4.141/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.4.148/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.6.7/32 attached Vlan100
Prefix Next Hop Interface
10.2.6.16/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.6.31/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.7.14/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.7.22/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.7.24/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.7.34/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.7.37/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.7.41/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.7.48/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.8.18/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.8.32/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.8.59/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.8.70/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.8.85/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.8.88/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.8.104/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.8.135/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.99.10/32 attached Vlan100
10.2.99.54/32 attached Vlan100
10.255.255.255/32 receive Vlan100
127.0.0.0/8 drop
172.31.0.0/16 attached Vlan120
172.31.0.0/32 receive Vlan120
172.31.0.1/32 receive Vlan120
172.31.0.5/32 attached Vlan120
172.31.0.29/32 attached Vlan120
172.31.255.255/32 receive Vlan120
192.1.0.0/16 10.1.1.254 Vlan100
224.0.0.0/4 drop
224.0.0.0/24 receive
Prefix Next Hop Interface
240.0.0.0/4 drop
and show ip arp
Protocol Address Age (min) Hardware Addr Type Interface
Internet 10.1.1.1 0 aa00.0400.c286 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.6 0 0050.5689.24b8 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.10 0 0050.5694.7d20 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.11 0 0050.5694.7d20 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.12 0 0050.5694.6ae7 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.13 0 0050.5694.6ae7 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.14 0 0050.568a.6321 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.16 0 0050.5694.0ab5 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.17 0 0050.5694.493d ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.40 0 0013.19b0.9c40 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.41 0 1c17.d35a.c840 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.50 0 0002.b9b4.a5c0 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.60 0 000a.410f.e500 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.71 - 0008.e3ff.fc28 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.96 0 e02f.6d12.4df3 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.98 0 0050.5696.6d86 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.99 0 0050.5696.6d88 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.121 0 e02f.6d12.4dea ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.122 0 e02f.6d12.4e61 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.123 0 e02f.6d5b.c10e ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.124 0 e02f.6d17.c869 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.125 0 e02f.6d5b.c217 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.126 0 e02f.6d17.c8ec ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.127 0 e02f.6d17.c876 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.128 0 e02f.6d5b.bef3 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.202 0 0000.85b7.9031 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.222 0 000f.f84d.2ca9 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.225 0 000f.f84d.3963 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.227 0 00c0.ee26.9367 ARPA Vlan100
Protocol Address Age (min) Hardware Addr Type Interface
Internet 10.1.1.250 - 0008.e3ff.fc28 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.1.1.254 0 0000.0c07.ac07 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.2 0 0011.4333.bcda ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.3 0 0050.5689.5d38 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.4 0 0050.5689.0404 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.6 0 0050.5689.6d3b ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.7 0 1cc1.def4.6940 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.8 0 0050.5689.330e ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.9 0 0012.793a.3ccc ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.10 0 0012.7990.e5d3 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.13 0 0050.568a.6dcf ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.15 0 0050.568a.60ff ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.18 0 0050.5689.091b ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.20 0 0050.5689.451c ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.21 0 0050.568a.0cf4 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.22 0 0050.5689.6c59 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.23 0 0050.5696.6d9e ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.24 0 0050.5689.76c4 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.26 0 0050.5689.2f4e ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.27 0 0050.5689.0632 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.28 0 0050.5689.1ce9 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.29 0 0050.5689.6aaa ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.31 0 0050.5689.0d1a ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.37 0 0050.5696.6d81 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.103 0 d4be.d9be.8eef ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.106 0 14fe.b5e1.c595 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.107 0 0023.ae7d.a966 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.108 0 d4be.d9c8.6770 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.109 0 14fe.b5e9.c5b5 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.110 0 14fe.b5ea.5f9d ARPA Vlan100
Protocol Address Age (min) Hardware Addr Type Interface
Internet 10.2.1.111 0 001e.c959.d4f0 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.114 0 b8ac.6f48.4538 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.115 0 14fe.b5e1.ed89 ARPA Vlan100
Internet 10.2.1.116 0 7845.c409.1959 ARPA Vlan100
Thanks
Lotfi -
Error when attempting to remove static route from ASA 5525x running version 9.0(4)
Hello,
I am having difficulty in removing static routes from my ASA5525x, hoping someone here may be able to help.
Example:
ASA5525X/pri/act# sh route | in 192.168
S 192.168.60.0 255.255.255.0 [1/0] via 64.57.xxx.xx, OUTSIDE
ATLCOLO-ASA5525X/pri/act(config)# no route OUTSIDE 192.168.60.0 255.255.255.0 64.57.xxx.xx
%No matching route to delete
There are several which need to be removed, all 192.168.x.x/24, pointing to the Outside interface using the same address 64.57.xxx.xxHi,
I think i agree with Jon that this is probably due to RRI from the VPN configuration.
Also , check this output:-
show asp table routing and see if you see it in here as well.
We also have some defects so please provide the relevant interface and routing configuration and also the ASA code version.
Thanks and Regards,
Vibhor Amrodia -
Setting up static routing in sa520. Im stuck.
Hello,
I finally got my cisco router and all excited about it i tried to set it up. Everything went fine until i wanted a local machine to get its own IP adress that is reachable from the outside.
Basicly i used static IP setting in the wan/ip4v menu. This worked great and with the router assigning dhcp too all computers.
Now all the local computers has internet connection and they share one ip adress on the outside.
As for where im stuck. I have a xserve with 2 networkcards. It runs a FTP server which we use local but we also have customers needing to reach it from the outside. The local FTP works but im having difficulties assigning a outside IP too it. Our ISP has provided 5 different ipadresses.
I have tried to do this in 2 different ways where the second way is preferable.
first try:
Use the optional port as a second wan. give it the same settings as the first wan got but another ip-adress.
Then connect the xserves outside network card directly too that wan port and use dhcp. This did not work.
second try:
Assign a static routing from the wan2(optional port) too the local ipadress for the xserve.
Can someone elaborate on how this should be done?
Thank you.
Edit:
Later today i will try this firewall rule.
http://bildr.no/view/580301
Basicly i want to forward any connections from wan2 too 192.168.1.33 which is my server. Does that look correct?Thank you for your quick reply.
Im using version 1.1.21.
Im actully quite sure that its a user problem rather then firmware error. It´s the first time i evern touch a Cisco router and i havn´t done that much networking.
I can show you how i did it on my xserve. Maybe you can elaborate on how i can do it the same way.
redirect_port
proto
tcp
targetIP
192.168.1.50
targetPortRange
80
aliasIP
77.40.XXX.220
aliasPortRange
8888
Basicly it says push whatever trafic from ip 77.40.xxx.220 too 192.168.1.50 on the local network.
How can i do the same thing on my cisco router? It´s a NAT ip-forward rule.
Edit:
Screenshot shows what i have been trying.
I have chosen optional wan which is set to use another external IP adress but this does not work. It would be so much easier if i could just type in the external IP adress there and use the same gateway, dns as the main WAN.
Added config aswell.
Thank you. -
Hello,
I am trying to setup my Linksys WRT55AG router in Router Operation Mode.
My configuration is as follows:
Internet Side:
WAN-192.168.0.1/24
gw 192.168.0.2
Internal Side:
LAN-10.10.10.1/24
In the Gateway mode, it seems to function as designed while in the Router mode, I am unable to create the following static route:
172.16.0.0/24 gateway 192.168.0.2 WAN interface.
The error states the following:
Invalid gateway address: not in 10.10.10.1/255.255.255.0 network
This makes no sense to me unless I am missing something here?If you change the router into router mode you turn off NAT. This means you'll see the LAN IP addresses 10.10.10.* on the outside of the router. The reason why you cannot ping anything in the 192.168.0.* subnet anymore is simply because the devices connecte in 192.168.0.* don't have routes for 10.10.10.0 or better they forward it to the default gateway. For instance, if you ping 192.168.0.50 from 10.10.10.5 with the router in router mode:
10.10.10.5: 192.168.0.50 is not in the LAN, thus it sends the packet to the default gateway 10.10.10.1
10.10.10.1: the router is connected to 192.168.0.0/24 on the WAN side. It will use ARP to find the MAC address of 192.168.0.50 on the WAN side and will send the packet to 192.168.0.50
192.168.0.50: receives the ping request and send the ping reply to 10.10.10.5.
192.168.0.50: 10.10.10.5 is not in the LAN. There is no static route for 10.10.10.5 available. Therefore the packet is forwarded to the default gateway which is 192.168.0.2 in your LAN.
192.168.0.2: 10.10.10.5 is not known to be connected to either the LAN or WAN side. Therefore the router will forward the packet its own default gateway which will be the gateway router of your ISP.
ISP router: the router will simply drop packets with private source or destination addresses, thus it will drop a packet for 10.10.10.5
The problem is that neither the computers inside 192.168.0.* nor the router 192.168.0.2 knows about the existence of the 10.10.10.0/24 subnet inside your LAN. You have to add static routes on router to get access into the 10.10.10.0/24 subnet.
The reason why it works in gateway mode, i.e. with NAT enabled, is simply because above the router 10.10.10.1 will do something differently:
10.10.10.1: **The router does NAT. It will first replace the source IP address of the packet from 10.10.10.1 with its own "public" IP address which is 192.168.0.1.** The router is connected to 192.168.0.0/24 on the WAN side. It will use ARP to find the MAC address of 192.168.0.50 on the WAN side and will send the packet to 192.168.0.50.
Note, that the ICMP ping received on the target has a source IP address of 192.168.0.1 now instead of 10.10.10.5 as before. The router and computers in side 192.168.0.* all know how to send something to 192.168.0.1.
Regarding the extra route: packets not matched with any other static router will be forwarded to the default gateway. The default gateway is 192.168.0.2 on your Linksys. You don't need the route. The router should not show this strange error message because the route for itself is O.K. but adding the route won't change the routing of the router. -
Cannot remove misstyped static route
I have misstyped a static route (netmask is wrong) and cannot delete:
gw-kuvasz#sh run | include route
route alba-dmz 0.246.102.79 25.255.255.255 10.63.201.110 1
If I try to remove get the following error message:
gw-kuvasz(config)# no route alba-dmz 0.246.102.79 25.255.255.255 10.63.201.110
ERROR: Invalid network address 0.246.102.79, cannot add route
What to do?
Thank for the help: JosephHi,
Seems both the network address and mask are wrong.
There are not that many commands related to routes you can use
This seems like some bug. I dont know why it is giving a message of adding a route when you are removing one.
I tried this with my home ASA5505 (8.4(5)) and it wont let me even add that route to begin with.
One command you could try (risks involed) is to remove all the routes regarding "alba-dmz" interface on the ASA. This command doesnt specify the exact route to be removed but rather removes all static routes from that interface so it has its own risks.
ASA(config)# clear configure route alba-dmz
Depending on your network setup you might want to do this outside normal working hours since you need to remove all routes from that interface. I am not sure if it will work.
One idea is naturally booting up the ASA if you havent saved the configuration
Or perhaps trying to boot the ASA with a configuration file that doesnt include the route
- Jouni -
How do you Redistribution EIGRP into OSPF and maintain a distance of 250 for a static route?
Ok, I have scoured the forums long enough and have to post. The design is below. I moved a firewall to our new data center, which required adding some static routes for VPN connections and broadband backups. To minimize the amount of static routes I redistribute static into EIGRP with a route-map and prefix-list.
My problem is the next part of my network. When the data leaves my 56128's it hits an edge device connecting to our dark fiber. On this edge device I am running OSPF onto the dark fiber, then redistribute some EIGRP subnets into OSPF and again all is well.
Everything works up until the point the redistributed routes hit my RIB at my main data center where I am running IBGP. IBPG is run between our MPLS router and core for all our remote sites. When my backup route from the 56128's hits the cores, it supersedes the BGP route because the AD route O E2 [110/20] is lower than the BGP AD B [200/0]. Given the configuration below what can be done to remedy this? Oh when I redistribute I can only change the AD for the backup routes, all other routes should stay the same.
56128's where my static routes are:
ip route 192.168.101.0/24 192.168.30.77 name firewall 250
router eigrp 65100
redistribute static route-map Static-To-Eigrp
route-map Static-To-Eigrp permit 10
match ip address prefix-list Static2Eigrp
ip prefix-list Static2Eigrp seq 2 permit 192.168.101.0/24
Edge device:
router eigrp 65100
network 172.18.0.5 0.0.0.0
network 172.18.0.32 0.0.0.3
network 172.18.0.36 0.0.0.3
redistribute ospf 65100 metric 2000000 0 255 1 1500
redistribute static metric 200000 0 255 1 1500 route-map STATICS_INTO_EIGRP
passive-interface default
no passive-interface Port-channel11
no passive-interface Port-channel12
eigrp router-id 172.18.0.5
router ospf 65100
router-id 172.18.0.5
log-adjacency-changes
redistribute eigrp 65100 subnets route-map EIGRP_INTO_OSPF
passive-interface default
no passive-interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
no passive-interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
no passive-interface GigabitEthernet2/0/1
no passive-interface GigabitEthernet2/0/2
network 172.18.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
ip prefix-list EIGRP_INTO_OSPF seq 5 permit 172.18.0.0/16 le 32
ip prefix-list EIGRP_INTO_OSPF seq 10 permit 192.168.94.0/29 le 32
ip prefix-list EIGRP_INTO_OSPF seq 15 permit 192.168.26.32/29 le 32
ip prefix-list EIGRP_INTO_OSPF seq 20 permit 192.168.30.72/29 le 32
ip prefix-list EIGRP_INTO_OSPF seq 25 permit 192.168.20.128/25 le 32
ip prefix-list EIGRP_INTO_OSPF seq 26 permit 192.168.101.0/24 le 32 <- Backup Route for MPLS Remote Office
route-map EIGRP_INTO_OSPF permit 10
match ip address prefix-list EIGRP_INTO_OSPFSo in the case of a /24. If it were say broken up into /25's? From our remote sites we are using aggregate-address summary-only. Not sure how I would advertise a more specific route via BGP, sorry.
I didnt have this problem until I moved my firewalls. They plugged into the cores where IBGP was running and the static never kicked in unless the bgp route disappeared. I guess I could use my static redistribution for my VPN sites and use statics across the cores for the handful of backup links I have. -
Configuring static routes at the network edge
We have some Cisco 1750 routers at the edge of our network which are running RIP. We were advised to use static routes on the router, since there was only one route (across a WAN link) for traffic to go from the hub connected to the router, as RIP would only waste the limited bandwidth to the router. We posted this problem previously and got a response which stated :You could set up a default static route on your edge router, run RIP on your internal routers in order to propagate the default, but block the RIP to the outside.
On your edge router, make a default route to your external link. Keep RIP running as before, but add the line redistribute static in your rip configuration. That will get the default route propagated.
Now to stop the RIP on the external interface: If the link is on a different major IP network to your internal network, you can simply not include it in the network commands under rip. But if it is in the same network, then RIP will be enabled on the interface, so you will have to add passive-interface xxxxx, where xxxxx refers to the interface carrying your external link,
Alternatively, you could define your default route using the ip default-network command. This will get propagated automatically into the RIP even without the redistribute command.
We tried it, the problem is that the router is unreachable, via the serial or Ethernet, although if connected to the router via console port, with the configuration screen , you are able to ping external locations, and are able to telnet into the router, but he PC's on the Ethernet side of the router cant see the network.
Assistance\Advice requested.
attached you wll find , the actual reply , and a copy of some info from our work file.Ernie
I have looked at the config that you posted and I see several issues. The serial interface on Salvage is 172.20.2.2. Your message indicates that it is connected via serial to a 3640 which your message seems to indicate is 172.20.1.4. But that makes the 3640 on a different subnet. Connections over a serial link should be in the same subnet on both ends. (The exception to that is when you are using the ip unnumbered feature - which you are not). I suspect that part of your problem is that the routers do not see themselves on a connected subnet. When you run RIP over the link it can compensate for that to some degree. But when you stop RIP the problem has impact.
Also I see that you have a static default route as Kevin suggested. And in RIP you have redistribute static. But there is no default metric defined. To redistribute into RIP you need a default metric. Another aspect of the problem with the default route is that the next hop for the default route is 172.20.1.4, but without RIP running I believe that Salvage has no idea how to get to that address. You can confirm this by doing show ip route 172.20.1.4 on Salvage. I suspect that you will get an error about route not in table.
Beyond these issues I believe that there is a larger problem of misunderstanding. When I look at your original post in this thread it talks about not running RIP over the serial link. And when I read Kevin's response the first paragraph is describing not running RIP over the serial interface when it says do static default on your edge router and run RIP on your internal router. If you are not running RIP over the serial interface then I see no reason to run RIP on Salvage at all. There is one piece of this that Kevin did not address. If you do not run RIP over the serial link then how does the 3640 know about the Ethernet subnet at Salvage. I believe that the answer is that the 3640 needs to configure a static route to 172.20.27.0 with the 1750 serial interface as the next hop. And if there are other routers that the 3640 communicates with via RIP then the 3640 needs to redistribute static into RIP (remembering to have a default metric).
If you address these issues I believe that you will have connectivity from the central network to the remote subnet on Salvage.
HTH
Rick
Maybe you are looking for
-
I have an Ipad2, an Iphone 4 . I want to be able to sync both of these with my Windows desktop and Outlook 2007. I would like to sync to and from the Idevices and Outlook. When I attempt to sync in itunes I get a popup message asking if I want to del
-
In iOS 8 how can I connect to 2 g
hhello Sai ; in India i Ma using iPhone 5 s I have updated to iOS 8 and how I want to connect to 2 g in India becaude in India we don't have lthe 4 g network please solve it
-
NI Max Configurin​g Motion Bd Parameters - How to retrieve them
I use my PXI-7344 Motion Card with Labview 7.1 and I configure the parameters such as the software limit thresholds in Ni Max. When I am writing my Labview program and I am trying to see where the PXI-7344 SW Limits thresholds are set, I can not re
-
Hi. This might be a little difficult to explain. I want to change the colour of certain people's faces in FCP 5. Just their faces, possibly their bodies as well, but not the entire frame. The story i'm working on involved on character seeing others i
-
DocumentPresets not available in script after upgrade from CS3 to CS5
I had a script working that created a new document using a preset in InDesign CS3. Since I upgraded to CS5, app.documentPresets only contains [Default]. I've even output the length and count() of the app.documentPresets array. Both result in 1. H