Error adding static route

I'm trying to add two routes 192.168.201.0/24 & 192.168.202.0/24 (Gateway on both is 192.168.210.200) on a WRT54G v8 that is on 192.168.210.0/24 I get May be default route already exists What's the deal on this?
This was a replacement router of the same model, firmware  version may be different, but the previous router had both routes.
Her is the current route table. I'm sorry I just don't see it.
0.0.0.0  0.0.0.0 75.23.215.254 WAN (Internet)
75.23.209.79 255.255.255.255 75.23.209.79 WAN (Internet)
75.23.215.254 255.255.255.255 75.23.215.254 WAN (Internet)
192.168.210.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.210.1 LAN & Wireless
Regards,
Kevin

So it appears that there is no option to lock down access to the shell now that the command that you used to use is no longer valid. What is worse is that there isn't an option to create an ACL in the shell that you could attach to the interface. So I would recommend that you create a defect with Cisco TAC and get this re-added or request that ACL functionality is added. 
For the GUI (in case you were not already aware of this), you can restrict access from Administration > Admin Access > Settings > Access > IP Access

Similar Messages

  • Adding Static Routes for VLANS

    We have 3 servers each in a different vlan and 1 server is a Bordermanager.
    We added network routes to 2 server and all the vlans can see them, the
    Bordermanager already has a default route that takes it out on the
    internet, when we try to add a private network number of the vlans, it does
    not see the other vlans. What is the correct way to do this or is there?
    Thank you...

    Ok Craig,
    There are only 2 vlans, VLAN1 has all the servers, VLAN2 has all the users,
    a Cisco router supposedly does the routing between both VLANS because the
    router protocol supports ISL. Rip has been removed from the servers. The
    Bordermanager Server is in VLAN1, the problem is that all the servers you
    can change the Static Route to the VLAN2 that has all the users, but the
    Border cannot because it's static route goes out to the internet and it
    doesn't let you make a change, would a 3 card in the Border help? Thanxs...
    > In article <Mfc4e.1881$[email protected]>, wrote:
    > > when we try to add a private network number of the vlans, it does
    > > not see the other vlans. What is the correct way to do this or is there?
    > >
    > Can you give more details?
    >
    > Somewhere there has to be a router that contains all of the VLANS in order
    > to route between them. (Or a pair of routers each with 2 of the VLANS).
    > This could be a server or a routing module in your VLAN box.
    >
    > The BMgr server would need a static route pointing to the router(s)
    > connecting the VLANS.
    >
    > Craig Johnson
    > Novell Support Connection SysOp
    > *** For a current patch list, tips, handy files and books on
    > BorderManager, go to http://www.craigjconsulting.com ***
    >

  • Adding static route on OSX server 10.4.3

    Hi,
    In the past one was able to add the following command to the Network file to set-up a permanent route.
    route add -net <network> <router>
    The Network folder in StartUp Items no longer exists where is the best place to add this now.
    regards,
    Paddy

    Not necessarily, Polar. There are many cases where you need to control routing at a host level, not just at the router level.
    For example, assume your system was dual-homed (has two active ethernet connections) using 192.168.1.x on en0 and 10.1.1.x on en1, with 192.168.1.1 (en0) as your default route.
    Now assume that the router at 10.1.1.1 on the en1 network acts as a gateway to the 10.2.2.x subnet. You need to tell your machine to route 10.2.2.x through 10.1.1.1. Default routing won't do this - the system will send all non-local traffic to 192.168.1.1. Unless 192.168.1.1 also has a path to 10.2.2.x, that traffic isn't going to go anywhere, and putting a link between the public router and the 10.2.2.x network might be a security risk.
    Therefore the solution is to tell your machine to route 10.2.2.x through the 10.1.1.1 router via a static route on the host.

  • Network Errors Adding New Router

    Hello,
    I posted this in the iChat forum earlier today but I think this would a better forum to ask this question. We were using a D-Link DI-604 Wired Router for about 5 years until yesterday when we purchased a new D-Link EBR-2310 Wired Router. Ever since connecting the new router, about every 15 to 30 minutes in the console log on my iMac 3.06 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, I get the following errors now:
    Jun 12 17:31:57 <computer name> kernel[0]: AppleYukon2: 00000001,00000000 sk98nif - deadmanCheck - nothing received, resetting chip
    Jun 12 17:31:57 <computer name> configd[14]: AppleTalk shutdown
    Jun 12 17:31:59 <computer name> configd[14]: AppleTalk shutdown complete
    Jun 12 17:32:01 <computer name> kernel[0]: AppleYukon2: error - Link Partner not Auto-Neg. able
    Jun 12 17:32:01 <computer name> configd[14]: AppleTalk startup
    Jun 12 17:32:01 <computer name> kernel[0]: AppleYukon2: 00000000,00000000 skgehw - cppSkDrvEvent - SKDRV_LIPA_NOT_ANABLE: link partner not auto-negotiate capable, port, phy r6
    Jun 12 17:32:01 <computer name> kernel[0]: Ethernet [AppleYukon2]: Link up on en0, 10-Megabit, Half-duplex, No flow-control, Debug [796d,0c08,0de1,0200,0021,0000]
    Jun 12 17:32:07 <computer name> configd[14]: AppleTalk startup complete
    This never happened with the old router and I can't figure out what is causing this (I keep a close watch on my console log and I know for sure that this problem just started since connecting the new router). The new router is cascaded to an older Farallon 10Mbps ethernet hub (exactly the same way the old router was set up) so at first, I thought the errors may have been due to the fact that I had the WAN Port Speed of the new router set to "Auto 10/100Mbps" causing my iMac to (unsuccessfully) try to negotiate a faster port speed. On the old router, we had the WAN Port Speed set to 10Mbps and I never noticed any of these errors so I changed the WAN Port Speed on the new router to 10Mbps instead of "Auto 10/100Mbps" and we're still getting the same thing happening.
    I've tried connecting my iMac directly to the router and directly to the cascaded Farallon 10Mbps ethernet hub and either way, it makes no difference. Our internet connection works fine but we get the odd error when sending a print job to our networked HP LaserJet with the new router. Does anyone with any networking experience have any idea what can be causing this? Is there a way to change the 10/100Mbps speed on the iMac itself rather than on the router?
    Thanks so much,
    Gerard

    Is there a way to change the 10/100Mbps speed on the iMac itself rather than on the router?
    System Preferences/Network/Advanced/Ethernet - Configure manually
    The book on this router at Newegg is that it works for some people, but others using Vista notice the router can't handle multiple users very well. Disconnects, slow throughput, resets. It's not a very costly router, and hasn't had a firmware update since 2007. Maybe Vista pushes it too hard?
    I'm just guessing that the deadmanCheck reference in the error is some sort of test to see if anybody is there and when the router doesn't respond, the Mac reset's it's ethernet chips.
    Since you've had so many problems with the programs, firewall and port routing, and incomprehensible tech support, you might look at one of the competitors products that can keep up with your equipment.

  • ISE version 1.3 and static route not working

    This command works without any issues with ISE version 1.1 and 1.2:
    ip route 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.255 gateway 127.0.0.1
    However, it does NOT work in ISE version 1.3.  See below:
    ciscoisedev/admin(config)# ip route 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.255 gateway 127.0.0.1
    % Warning: Could not find outgoing interface for gateway 127.0.0.1 while trying to add the route.
    % Error: Error adding static route.
    ciscoisedev/admin(config)#
    Any ideas anyone?

    So it appears that there is no option to lock down access to the shell now that the command that you used to use is no longer valid. What is worse is that there isn't an option to create an ACL in the shell that you could attach to the interface. So I would recommend that you create a defect with Cisco TAC and get this re-added or request that ACL functionality is added. 
    For the GUI (in case you were not already aware of this), you can restrict access from Administration > Admin Access > Settings > Access > IP Access

  • Simple Load Sharing With Static Routes

    The scenario given below, L3 switch connected to 2 local LAN routers which in turn connected to internet router.
    I would like to distribute the internet traffic from local LAN(L3 switch) on both RTRA and RTRB by adding static routes on L3 switch. How can I achieve this without configuring the routing protocol.
    ---------------RTRA----
    L3SWITCH-------RTRB----INTERNET-RTR

    Hi
    If its simple internet traffic do keep in mind about the local NAT commands which has to be configured accordingly with route-maps here.
    If you are having your own block of ip address space then better to run bgp between the providers.
    regds

  • Static routing

    Hello,
    I set up a network (192.168.1.0), with a wrt160n router. I want to create a second network (192.168.2.0) and use the router to set up a static route between the two networks. Whenever I try to set up a static route and save the settings I get the error "invalid static route", although I think I use the correct data:
    destination lan ip: 192.168.2.0
    subnet mask: 255.255.255.0
    Gateway: 192.168.2.1 (static ip of the router in the second nw)
    interface: lan & wireless
    I already did an upgrade of the firmware but to no avail.
    Anybody any ideas?
    Best regards,
    Christophe

    Are you setting the first network with 192.168.1.0 or 192.168.0.1....?
    Make the first network at 192.168.0.1 and second at 192.168.0.2.Follow this link for Static Routing.

  • What is the Right Form of OSX 10.8 's Static Route Grammars

    I am not good at mac os code. so i have some questions about route grammar.
    eg:
    I need add a static route for a IP,
    just like:sudo route -nv add -net 10.0.0.0 192.168.42.254
    i input it in termina,then it worked. But when i restart mac. the route did not exist.
    so where is not right form about the "sudo route -nv add -net 10.0.0.0 192.168.42.254"?
    who can tell me more about How to add STATIC ROUTE in mac os? waiting on line.guys help me.

    Defining a persistent static route on Mac OS X - Server Fault
    Adding static routes to a network - Mac OS X Hints
    RouteSplit
    Setting a static route every boot with launchd - Ask Different

  • High CPU with error "%ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ:" in Catalyst 4500-X VSS after making L3 function (static routing)

    We have a VSS based on 2x WS-C4500X-16., The VSS is used as Layer 2 Switch for diffrents Vlan in our DC.
    After making the VSS as a Layer 3 gateway for our production VLAN and added 2 routes for routing purposes, we encountered a network down time with high CPU in the VSS and  a huges log messages : 
    .May 14 12:11:25.947: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.7.22 Vlan100
    .May 14 12:11:34.516: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.7.22 Vlan100
    .May 14 12:11:40.072: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.1.1.254 Vlan100
    .May 14 12:11:49.682: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.1.253 Vlan100
    .May 14 12:11:55.079: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.1.1.254 Vlan100
    .May 14 12:12:00.926: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.7.40 Vlan100
    .May 14 12:12:06.701: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.8.32 Vlan100
    .May 14 12:12:12.624: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.7.40 Vlan100
    .May 14 12:12:21.627: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.7.40 Vlan100
    .May 14 12:12:32.261: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.8.32 Vlan100
    .May 14 12:12:41.801: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.2.105 Vlan100
    .May 14 12:12:49.633: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.1.253 Vlan100
    .May 14 12:12:54.831: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.1.1.254 Vlan100
    .May 14 12:12:59.960: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.1.1.254 Vlan100
    .May 14 12:13:08.745: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.1.253 Vlan100
    .May 14 12:13:16.138: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.1.253 Vlan100
    .May 14 12:13:22.393: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.1.253 Vlan100
    .May 14 12:13:31.415: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.1.141 Vlan100
    .May 14 12:13:38.944: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.2.215 Vlan100
    .May 14 12:13:45.972: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.1.253 Vlan100
    Bellow are the show version of our VSS, 
    Cisco IOS Software, IOS-XE Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500e-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 03.04.00.SG RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
    Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
    Copyright (c) 1986-2012 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
    Compiled Wed 05-Dec-12 04:38 by prod_rel_team
    ROM: 15.0(1r)SG10
    S_C4500X_01 uptime is 33 weeks, 1 day, 14 minutes
    Uptime for this control processor is 33 weeks, 1 day, 16 minutes
    System returned to ROM by power-on
    System restarted at 11:59:10 UTC Tue Sep 24 2013
    Running default software
    Jawa Revision 2, Winter Revision 0x0.0x40
    Last reload reason: power-on
    License Information for 'WS-C4500X-16'
        License Level: ipbase   Type: Permanent
        Next reboot license Level: ipbase
    cisco WS-C4500X-16 (MPC8572) processor (revision 9) with 4194304K/20480K bytes of memory.
    Processor board ID JAE173303CF
    MPC8572 CPU at 1.5GHz, Cisco Catalyst 4500X
    Last reset from PowerUp
    4 Virtual Ethernet interfaces
    32 Ten Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
    511K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
    Configuration register is 0x2101
    Can you help please, 

    Hi,
    thanks for your reply, but there is no hsrp configured, just an interface vlan. with 2 static routes and the problem was there for more than an hour before we decided to rollback.
    Is there a BugId with this problem in Cisco DataBase.
    here is a show ip route 
    S_C4500X_01#      show ip route
    Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
           D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area 
           N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
           E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
           i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
           ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
           o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, H - NHRP, l - LISP
           + - replicated route, % - next hop override
    Gateway of last resort is 10.2.1.253 to network 0.0.0.0
    S*    0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 10.2.1.253
          10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
    C        10.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, Vlan100
    L        10.1.1.250/32 is directly connected, Vlan100
          172.31.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
    C        172.31.0.0/16 is directly connected, Vlan120
    L        172.31.0.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan120
    S     192.1.0.0/16 [1/0] via 10.1.1.254
    and the show ip cef: 
    _C4500X_01#        show ip cef 
    .May 14 12:13:57.859: %ADJ-3-RESOLVE_REQ: Adj resolve request: Failed to resolve 10.2.1.158 Vlan100 f
    Prefix               Next Hop             Interface
    0.0.0.0/0            10.2.1.253           Vlan100
    0.0.0.0/8            drop
    0.0.0.0/32           receive              
    10.0.0.0/8           attached             Vlan100
    10.0.0.0/32          receive              Vlan100
    10.1.1.6/32          attached             Vlan100
    10.1.1.17/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.1.1.40/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.1.1.41/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.1.1.50/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.1.1.60/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.1.1.99/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.1.1.121/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.1.1.122/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.1.1.124/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.1.1.125/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.1.1.126/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.1.1.225/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.1.1.227/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.1.1.250/32        receive              Vlan100
    10.1.1.254/32        10.1.1.254           Vlan100
    10.2.1.3/32          attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.4/32          attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.6/32          attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.8/32          attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.9/32          attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.18/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.23/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.24/32         attached             Vlan100
    Prefix               Next Hop             Interface
    10.2.1.26/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.28/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.29/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.31/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.103/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.108/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.109/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.124/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.129/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.137/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.139/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.143/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.144/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.159/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.167/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.174/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.175/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.176/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.1.181/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.4.38/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.4.39/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.4.43/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.4.47/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.4.51/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.4.63/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.4.65/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.4.69/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.4.71/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.4.73/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.4.102/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.4.106/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.4.107/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.4.113/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.4.116/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.4.119/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.4.120/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.4.122/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.4.141/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.4.148/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.6.7/32          attached             Vlan100
    Prefix               Next Hop             Interface
    10.2.6.16/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.6.31/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.7.14/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.7.22/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.7.24/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.7.34/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.7.37/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.7.41/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.7.48/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.8.18/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.8.32/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.8.59/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.8.70/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.8.85/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.8.88/32         attached             Vlan100
    10.2.8.104/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.8.135/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.99.10/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.2.99.54/32        attached             Vlan100
    10.255.255.255/32    receive              Vlan100
    127.0.0.0/8          drop
    172.31.0.0/16        attached             Vlan120
    172.31.0.0/32        receive              Vlan120
    172.31.0.1/32        receive              Vlan120
    172.31.0.5/32        attached             Vlan120
    172.31.0.29/32       attached             Vlan120
    172.31.255.255/32    receive              Vlan120
    192.1.0.0/16         10.1.1.254           Vlan100
    224.0.0.0/4          drop
    224.0.0.0/24         receive              
    Prefix               Next Hop             Interface
    240.0.0.0/4          drop
    and show ip arp 
    Protocol  Address          Age (min)  Hardware Addr   Type   Interface
    Internet  10.1.1.1                0   aa00.0400.c286  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.6                0   0050.5689.24b8  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.10               0   0050.5694.7d20  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.11               0   0050.5694.7d20  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.12               0   0050.5694.6ae7  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.13               0   0050.5694.6ae7  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.14               0   0050.568a.6321  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.16               0   0050.5694.0ab5  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.17               0   0050.5694.493d  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.40               0   0013.19b0.9c40  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.41               0   1c17.d35a.c840  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.50               0   0002.b9b4.a5c0  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.60               0   000a.410f.e500  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.71               -   0008.e3ff.fc28  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.96               0   e02f.6d12.4df3  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.98               0   0050.5696.6d86  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.99               0   0050.5696.6d88  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.121              0   e02f.6d12.4dea  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.122              0   e02f.6d12.4e61  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.123              0   e02f.6d5b.c10e  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.124              0   e02f.6d17.c869  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.125              0   e02f.6d5b.c217  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.126              0   e02f.6d17.c8ec  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.127              0   e02f.6d17.c876  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.128              0   e02f.6d5b.bef3  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.202              0   0000.85b7.9031  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.222              0   000f.f84d.2ca9  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.225              0   000f.f84d.3963  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.227              0   00c0.ee26.9367  ARPA   Vlan100
    Protocol  Address          Age (min)  Hardware Addr   Type   Interface
    Internet  10.1.1.250              -   0008.e3ff.fc28  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.1.1.254              0   0000.0c07.ac07  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.2                0   0011.4333.bcda  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.3                0   0050.5689.5d38  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.4                0   0050.5689.0404  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.6                0   0050.5689.6d3b  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.7                0   1cc1.def4.6940  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.8                0   0050.5689.330e  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.9                0   0012.793a.3ccc  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.10               0   0012.7990.e5d3  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.13               0   0050.568a.6dcf  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.15               0   0050.568a.60ff  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.18               0   0050.5689.091b  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.20               0   0050.5689.451c  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.21               0   0050.568a.0cf4  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.22               0   0050.5689.6c59  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.23               0   0050.5696.6d9e  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.24               0   0050.5689.76c4  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.26               0   0050.5689.2f4e  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.27               0   0050.5689.0632  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.28               0   0050.5689.1ce9  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.29               0   0050.5689.6aaa  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.31               0   0050.5689.0d1a  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.37               0   0050.5696.6d81  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.103              0   d4be.d9be.8eef  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.106              0   14fe.b5e1.c595  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.107              0   0023.ae7d.a966  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.108              0   d4be.d9c8.6770  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.109              0   14fe.b5e9.c5b5  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.110              0   14fe.b5ea.5f9d  ARPA   Vlan100
    Protocol  Address          Age (min)  Hardware Addr   Type   Interface
    Internet  10.2.1.111              0   001e.c959.d4f0  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.114              0   b8ac.6f48.4538  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.115              0   14fe.b5e1.ed89  ARPA   Vlan100
    Internet  10.2.1.116              0   7845.c409.1959  ARPA   Vlan100
    Thanks
    Lotfi

  • Error when attempting to remove static route from ASA 5525x running version 9.0(4)

    Hello, 
    I am having difficulty in removing static routes from my ASA5525x, hoping someone here may be able to help.
    Example:
    ASA5525X/pri/act# sh route | in 192.168
    S    192.168.60.0 255.255.255.0 [1/0] via 64.57.xxx.xx, OUTSIDE
    ATLCOLO-ASA5525X/pri/act(config)# no route OUTSIDE 192.168.60.0 255.255.255.0 64.57.xxx.xx
    %No matching route to delete
    There are several which need to be removed, all 192.168.x.x/24, pointing to the Outside interface using the same address 64.57.xxx.xx

    Hi,
    I think i agree with Jon that this is probably due to RRI from the VPN configuration.
    Also , check this output:-
    show asp table routing and see if you see it in here as well.
    We also have some defects so please provide the relevant interface and routing configuration and also the ASA code version.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Vibhor Amrodia

  • Setting up static routing in sa520. Im stuck.

    Hello,
    I finally got my cisco router and all excited about it i tried to set it up. Everything went fine until i wanted a local machine to get its own IP adress that is reachable from the outside.
    Basicly i used static IP setting in the wan/ip4v menu. This worked great and with the router assigning dhcp too all computers.
    Now all the local computers has internet connection and they share one ip adress on the outside.
    As for where im stuck. I have a xserve with 2 networkcards. It runs a FTP server which we use local but we also have customers needing to reach it from the outside. The local FTP works but im having difficulties assigning a outside IP too it. Our ISP has provided 5 different ipadresses.
    I have tried to do this in 2 different ways where the second way is preferable.
    first try:
    Use the optional port as a second wan. give it the same settings as the first wan got but another ip-adress.
    Then connect the xserves outside network card directly too that wan port and use dhcp. This did not work.
    second try:
    Assign a static routing from the wan2(optional port) too the local ipadress for the xserve.
    Can someone elaborate on how this should be done?
    Thank you.
    Edit:
    Later today i will try this firewall rule.
    http://bildr.no/view/580301
    Basicly i want to forward any connections from wan2 too 192.168.1.33 which is my server. Does that look correct?

    Thank you for your quick reply.
    Im using version 1.1.21.
    Im actully quite sure that its a user problem rather then firmware error. It´s the first time i evern touch a Cisco router and i havn´t done that much networking.
    I can show you how i did it on my xserve. Maybe you can elaborate on how i can do it the same way.
        redirect_port
                proto
                tcp
                targetIP
                192.168.1.50
                targetPortRange
                80
                aliasIP
                77.40.XXX.220
                aliasPortRange
                8888
    Basicly it says push whatever trafic from ip 77.40.xxx.220 too 192.168.1.50 on the local network.
    How can i do the same thing on my cisco router? It´s a NAT ip-forward rule.
    Edit:
    Screenshot shows what i have been trying.
    I have chosen optional wan which is set to use another external IP adress but this does not work. It would be so much easier if i could just type in the external IP adress there and use the same gateway, dns as the main WAN.
    Added config aswell.
    Thank you.

  • Unable to create static route

    Hello,
    I am trying to setup my Linksys WRT55AG router in Router Operation Mode.
    My configuration is as follows:
    Internet Side:
    WAN-192.168.0.1/24
    gw 192.168.0.2
    Internal Side:
    LAN-10.10.10.1/24
    In the Gateway mode, it seems to function as designed while in the Router mode, I am unable to create the following static route:
    172.16.0.0/24 gateway 192.168.0.2 WAN interface.
    The error states the following:
    Invalid gateway address: not in 10.10.10.1/255.255.255.0 network
    This makes no sense to me unless I am missing something here?

    If you change the router into router mode you turn off NAT. This means you'll see the LAN IP addresses 10.10.10.* on the outside of the router. The reason why you cannot ping anything in the 192.168.0.* subnet anymore is simply because the devices connecte in 192.168.0.* don't have routes for 10.10.10.0 or better they forward it to the default gateway. For instance, if you ping 192.168.0.50 from 10.10.10.5 with the router in router mode:
    10.10.10.5: 192.168.0.50 is not in the LAN, thus it sends the packet to the default gateway 10.10.10.1
    10.10.10.1: the router is connected to 192.168.0.0/24 on the WAN side. It will use ARP to find the MAC address of 192.168.0.50 on the WAN side and will send the packet to 192.168.0.50
    192.168.0.50: receives the ping request and send the ping reply to 10.10.10.5.
    192.168.0.50: 10.10.10.5 is not in the LAN. There is no static route for 10.10.10.5 available. Therefore the packet is forwarded to the default gateway which is 192.168.0.2 in your LAN.
    192.168.0.2: 10.10.10.5 is not known to be connected to either the LAN or WAN side. Therefore the router will forward the packet its own default gateway which will be the gateway router of your ISP.
    ISP router: the router will simply drop packets with private source or destination addresses, thus it will drop a packet for 10.10.10.5
    The problem is that neither the computers inside 192.168.0.* nor the router 192.168.0.2 knows about the existence of the 10.10.10.0/24 subnet inside your LAN. You have to add static routes on router to get access into the 10.10.10.0/24 subnet.
    The reason why it works in gateway mode, i.e. with NAT enabled, is simply because above the router 10.10.10.1 will do something differently:
    10.10.10.1: **The router does NAT. It will first replace the source IP address of the packet from 10.10.10.1 with its own "public" IP address which is 192.168.0.1.** The router is connected to 192.168.0.0/24 on the WAN side. It will use ARP to find the MAC address of 192.168.0.50 on the WAN side and will send the packet to 192.168.0.50.
    Note, that the ICMP ping received on the target has a source IP address of 192.168.0.1 now instead of 10.10.10.5 as before. The router and computers in side 192.168.0.* all know how to send something to 192.168.0.1.
    Regarding the extra route: packets not matched with any other static router will be forwarded to the default gateway. The default gateway is 192.168.0.2 on your Linksys. You don't need the route. The router should not show this strange error message because the route for itself is O.K. but adding the route won't change the routing of the router.

  • Cannot remove misstyped static route

    I have misstyped a static route (netmask is wrong) and cannot delete:
    gw-kuvasz#sh run | include route
    route alba-dmz 0.246.102.79 25.255.255.255 10.63.201.110 1
    If I try to remove get the following error message:
    gw-kuvasz(config)# no route alba-dmz 0.246.102.79 25.255.255.255 10.63.201.110
    ERROR: Invalid network address 0.246.102.79, cannot add route
    What to do?
    Thank for the help: Joseph

    Hi,
    Seems both the network address and mask are wrong.
    There are not that many commands related to routes you can use
    This seems like some bug. I dont know why it is giving a message of adding a route when you are removing one.
    I tried this with my home ASA5505 (8.4(5)) and it wont let me even add that route to begin with.
    One command you could try (risks involed) is to remove all the routes regarding "alba-dmz" interface on the ASA. This command doesnt specify the exact route to be removed but rather removes all static routes from that interface so it has its own risks.
    ASA(config)# clear configure route alba-dmz
    Depending on your network setup you might want to do this outside normal working hours since you need to remove all routes from that interface. I am not sure if it will work.
    One idea is naturally booting up the ASA if you havent saved the configuration
    Or perhaps trying to boot the ASA with a configuration file that doesnt include the route
    - Jouni

  • How do you Redistribution EIGRP into OSPF and maintain a distance of 250 for a static route?

    Ok, I have scoured the forums long enough and have to post. The design is below. I moved a firewall to our new data center, which required adding some static routes for VPN connections and broadband backups. To minimize the amount of static routes I redistribute static into EIGRP with a route-map and prefix-list.
    My problem is the next part of my network. When the data leaves my 56128's it hits an edge device connecting to our dark fiber. On this edge device I am running OSPF onto the dark fiber, then redistribute some EIGRP subnets into OSPF and again all is well.
    Everything works up until the point the redistributed routes hit my RIB at my main data center where I am running IBGP. IBPG is run between our MPLS router and core for all our remote sites. When my backup route from the 56128's hits the cores, it supersedes the BGP route because the AD route O E2 [110/20] is lower than the BGP AD B [200/0]. Given the configuration below what can be done to remedy this? Oh when I redistribute I can only change the AD for the backup routes, all other routes should stay the same.
    56128's where my static routes are:
    ip route 192.168.101.0/24 192.168.30.77 name firewall 250
    router eigrp 65100
       redistribute static route-map Static-To-Eigrp
    route-map Static-To-Eigrp permit 10
       match ip address prefix-list Static2Eigrp
    ip prefix-list Static2Eigrp seq 2 permit 192.168.101.0/24
    Edge device:
    router eigrp 65100
     network 172.18.0.5 0.0.0.0
     network 172.18.0.32 0.0.0.3
     network 172.18.0.36 0.0.0.3
     redistribute ospf 65100 metric 2000000 0 255 1 1500
     redistribute static metric 200000 0 255 1 1500 route-map STATICS_INTO_EIGRP
     passive-interface default
     no passive-interface Port-channel11
     no passive-interface Port-channel12
     eigrp router-id 172.18.0.5
    router ospf 65100
     router-id 172.18.0.5
     log-adjacency-changes
     redistribute eigrp 65100 subnets route-map EIGRP_INTO_OSPF
     passive-interface default
     no passive-interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
     no passive-interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
     no passive-interface GigabitEthernet2/0/1
     no passive-interface GigabitEthernet2/0/2
     network 172.18.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
    ip prefix-list EIGRP_INTO_OSPF seq 5 permit 172.18.0.0/16 le 32
    ip prefix-list EIGRP_INTO_OSPF seq 10 permit 192.168.94.0/29 le 32
    ip prefix-list EIGRP_INTO_OSPF seq 15 permit 192.168.26.32/29 le 32
    ip prefix-list EIGRP_INTO_OSPF seq 20 permit 192.168.30.72/29 le 32
    ip prefix-list EIGRP_INTO_OSPF seq 25 permit 192.168.20.128/25 le 32
    ip prefix-list EIGRP_INTO_OSPF seq 26 permit 192.168.101.0/24 le 32 <- Backup Route for MPLS Remote Office
    route-map EIGRP_INTO_OSPF permit 10
     match ip address prefix-list EIGRP_INTO_OSPF

    So in the case of a /24. If it were say broken up into /25's? From our remote sites we are using aggregate-address summary-only. Not sure how I would advertise a more specific route via BGP, sorry.
    I didnt have this problem until I moved my firewalls. They plugged into the cores where IBGP was running and the static never kicked in unless the bgp route disappeared. I guess I could use my static redistribution for my VPN sites and use statics across the cores for the handful of backup links I have.

  • Configuring static routes at the network edge

    We have some Cisco 1750 routers at the edge of our network which are running RIP. We were advised to use static routes on the router, since there was only one route (across a WAN link) for traffic to go from the hub connected to the router, as RIP would only waste the limited bandwidth to the router. We posted this problem previously and got a response which stated :You could set up a default static route on your edge router, run RIP on your internal routers in order to propagate the default, but block the RIP to the outside.
    On your edge router, make a default route to your external link. Keep RIP running as before, but add the line redistribute static in your rip configuration. That will get the default route propagated.
    Now to stop the RIP on the external interface: If the link is on a different major IP network to your internal network, you can simply not include it in the network commands under rip. But if it is in the same network, then RIP will be enabled on the interface, so you will have to add passive-interface xxxxx, where xxxxx refers to the interface carrying your external link,
    Alternatively, you could define your default route using the ip default-network command. This will get propagated automatically into the RIP even without the redistribute command.
    We tried it, the problem is that the router is unreachable, via the serial or Ethernet, although if connected to the router via console port, with the configuration screen , you are able to ping external locations, and are able to telnet into the router, but he PC's on the Ethernet side of the router cant see the network.
    Assistance\Advice requested.
    attached you wll find , the actual reply , and a copy of some info from our work file.

    Ernie
    I have looked at the config that you posted and I see several issues. The serial interface on Salvage is 172.20.2.2. Your message indicates that it is connected via serial to a 3640 which your message seems to indicate is 172.20.1.4. But that makes the 3640 on a different subnet. Connections over a serial link should be in the same subnet on both ends. (The exception to that is when you are using the ip unnumbered feature - which you are not). I suspect that part of your problem is that the routers do not see themselves on a connected subnet. When you run RIP over the link it can compensate for that to some degree. But when you stop RIP the problem has impact.
    Also I see that you have a static default route as Kevin suggested. And in RIP you have redistribute static. But there is no default metric defined. To redistribute into RIP you need a default metric. Another aspect of the problem with the default route is that the next hop for the default route is 172.20.1.4, but without RIP running I believe that Salvage has no idea how to get to that address. You can confirm this by doing show ip route 172.20.1.4 on Salvage. I suspect that you will get an error about route not in table.
    Beyond these issues I believe that there is a larger problem of misunderstanding. When I look at your original post in this thread it talks about not running RIP over the serial link. And when I read Kevin's response the first paragraph is describing not running RIP over the serial interface when it says do static default on your edge router and run RIP on your internal router. If you are not running RIP over the serial interface then I see no reason to run RIP on Salvage at all. There is one piece of this that Kevin did not address. If you do not run RIP over the serial link then how does the 3640 know about the Ethernet subnet at Salvage. I believe that the answer is that the 3640 needs to configure a static route to 172.20.27.0 with the 1750 serial interface as the next hop. And if there are other routers that the 3640 communicates with via RIP then the 3640 needs to redistribute static into RIP (remembering to have a default metric).
    If you address these issues I believe that you will have connectivity from the central network to the remote subnet on Salvage.
    HTH
    Rick

Maybe you are looking for