Error creating a contract with multiple account assignments

Hallo,
I have created a PO agreement with a single account assignment on tr - ME31K.
If I open this agreement and open the account assignments for an item I'm able to press the "Change display" button. In the screen which is showed I'm able to set the distribution to set the distribution to 1 - Distribution on quantity basis. If I do so I get the following error message: " Enter Acc. ***. Block". The only thing I could do is set this indicator!. But when I set this indicator this indicator is resettled and the message appears again.
The thing I want to do is that it is possible to create a contract whit multiple account assignments.
Could any one say what is missing or what is wrong?
My SAP version is 47x110 SR1.
Kind regards,
Richard MeijnError creating a contract with multiple account assignments

Rahul,
The reason why I created a contract with a single Account Assignment is that it was not possible to save the document.
So I created a document for my example and want to change it to a multiple Account assignment. So I did the steps as described.
After adding a extra account line and pressing Enter I get the error message as described: "Enter Acc. ***. Block".
There must be a setting wring in the IMG but I don't know which one?
I have looked ad transaction "OME9" but couldn't see the cause.
Kind Regards,
Richard Meijn

Similar Messages

PO with multiple account assignments - non valuated / valuated GR

Hi Experts,
If I create a PO for goods with multiple account assignments the GR will not be valuated, but if I do the same for a service PO the GR will be valuated.
What is the reason for this?
Thanks in advance,
Francisco Melo

Hi,
There is more of a qualitative response to the issue, rather than quantitative, If you go through SAP Note 204252 for GR of material it says that: "We have not implemented this function since users who post goods receipts would have to determine the distribution to individual account assignment items during partial deliveries. Generally, users cannot or should not determine this.
An automatic distribution also causes problems and is also not implemented due to technical reasons".
Means basically here a stores guy is doing GR and he maynot be competent enough to decide on the Account assignment front.
However in general the service entry sheet is filled by departments who have got the work done, and are aware of the account assignment for that work.
Hope this is helpful for you.
Regards
Chandra Shekhar

Non valuated Goods Receipt for materials with multiple account assignments

We have been using multiple a/c assignments for services on purchase orders for sometime with no issues. Recently we used a multiple a/c assignment distribution for a material P/O. this didn't work the same and the Goods Receipt was set as non valuated.
This leaves the cost showing as a commitment and we do not get any actual costs charged at the GR point until we get and post the invoice. This only happens with multiple account assignments, all material P/O goods receipts for single assignments get valuated.
Were not sure why this happens, and want it treated the same. Is there any way we can get these valuated the same way single assignment materials or multi assignment services are.
The non valuated GR flag is getting set automatically, but we can't see where this is coming from for this scenario, so were a bit stuck.
Any advice/direction would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Graham

Hi Deshamol, No the materials are all valuated, as mentioned, they all work fine when used as single a/c assignment.
Anupam, Your answer doesn't make sense to me, this is 1 line on the P/O, therefore 1 material. It can't be both valuated and none valuated for each a/c assignment.
I have read in a note there there is a business function that you can apply to get this working, has anybody tried it?
Thanks
Graham

Subsequent credit to PO with multiple account assignments

Good Morning -
In ECC 6.0 when posting a subsequent credit to a purchase order that has multiple account assignments, the posting adds a commitment back onto the purchase order. This works opposite of the subsequent credit that is posted to a purchase order that has a single account assignment. Is there a fix that does not allow the commitment to be added to the purchase order?
Thanks.
Dan Scott

Hi Dan,
I would advice you to have a look at notes 1494239 and 1432085.
And in case you enter new account assignment in MIRO (unplanned acc. ***) pls. read the notes 496557 and 1446793.
Kind regards,
Edit

Value mismatch in ME23N and MIRO for PO with multiple account assignments

Hello All,
I've a PO for indriect material procurement with no material master and I've a single PO item with Account Assignment Category as "K" (Cost Center) and Net Price as "1,357.91". Account Assignment has been distributed by percentage such that 50% goes to a cost center and the remaining 50% goes to another cost center.
When I do MIRO, the amount comes as "1.357,92". This is because, the actual PO price "1,357.91" is divided by 2 equal half due to multiple account assignment and the individual amount comes to 678.955. And this is rounded off to 678.96 and multiplied by 2 in MIRO and the final amount comes to "1357.92". So as you see, the variance between PO price and MIRO price is 0.01.
How to get rid of this variance? Can something be done to match the PO value and MIRO value the same?
Thanks for your inputs.
Sankar

HI Sankar,
This is a standard behaviour as Currencies with 2 decimals will be getting rounded off. One work around to avoid posting of Small differences in Invoices (DIF accounts) is to maually change the amount in the Account assignment in the Invoice line to match to PO line total.
Regards,
Kathir

Service PO - Multiple account assignments for service line items

Hi All,
I'm trying to create a service purchase order using BAPI 'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'.
But i need to create service line items with multiple account assignments say
For line item 10 -
1)Service line 1 -Cost center 'XYZ'.
2)Service line 2 -Cost center 'ABC'.
In POACCOUNT there is no option to specify the service line item .
Moreover in POSERVICES also there is no option to mention costcenter.
How can i create the same...
Thanks in advance
Regards
Prasanthi

Dear Prithviraj,
CAPEX (Category 'A'), can it apply to OPEX/Blanket and Sm. Proj?
I know create multiple account assigment under ME51N/ME52N.
Any solution by using FM (BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE and BAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE)?
thanks
Regards,
Weng

Limti PO with Multiple account assignment Problem

Hi,
Can we create limit PO with Multiple account assignment.
If yes, i have issue with commitment distribution for all the account assignment. when i post service entry sheet the value is posting for only first one cost centre/Order but not all.
So in the purchase order for the remaining account assignment commitment remain left.
Reagrds,
JM

Hi Summer,
We have implemented SAP Note 1165524 for multiple account assignment as suggested, and it is working fine for New POs.
But we have old Purchase order which still have wrong commitment, and GR and IR are already posted for this PO, we have to reduce the commitment to Zero.
there is one solution for this is set 'No further Invoice expected' check box selected in this PO, but in our case PO went into error in process after doing this.
Please help me to reduce commitment to zero for this old PO
Thanks in advance
Vikas

Valuated GR with Multiple Account Assignment

Hi SAP Experts!
I would want to know the logic behind always using a Non-valuated GRs with Multiple Account Assignments.
I am asking this because we would want to make use of the budget checking during GRs. More specifically, whenever there is a GR, the committed budget will move to the actual budget. In our business practice, more often than not, the invoice is entered much later than the GR. This would mean that the amount of the purchase will remain in the committed state even if the goods have already been received.
Is there a way to work around this in SAP? Or is this the only way that it does this?
Hope to hear from you guys soon. Thanks in advance.

Hi,
I am sorry but the basic process is that you cannopt have a valuated receipt for a line with multiple account assignments.
An alternative (albeit a not very good one) is to just use separate lines on the PO instead of multiple account assignment.
this may not be any help, but I doubt if there are any user-friendly alternatives.
Steve B

Services with multiple account assignment.

Hi all,
How can I find out the POs which are having the multiple account assignment for the service line items from tables ?
I am looking for services with multiple account assignments
Regards

Hi
Go to SE16 , give table name -EKPO
Now if you have purchase order nos with you then copy paste the PO numbers here , or select company code or site to restrict your entries. It will control the performance of the data execution.
Then execute this (remove max no 200 ) . Go to Settings-- Format List -- Choose fields. Deselect all and select fields as per your requirement.If field names are coming in technical names you can change this via settings--User parameter and select -Field Label.
You can extract this report to excel as well. Same PO number with all account assignment category.
Please note if you have high volume of data then extract all the POs under service orders first from EKKO table and copy all the service PO numbers availbvale and paste in table EKPO, it will increase performance as well.
Cheers
Mukta

Asset PO with Multiple account assignment..!!!

Hi all ,
i am creating asset PO with multiple account assignment and having pricing condition 5.5% Octroi..
While doing the MIRO , system should distrubuted octorie amount to all the assets ( load to asset value )
But system is not capture the octorie amount in MIRO...
Any customization required for multiple account assignment in case of Asset PO ..??
Please help.

Hi,
In MIRO, item detail screen, you check for a button which allows apportionment of the value.
Regards
Aloysius

Service contract with multiple validity period

Hi,
I am having a requirement where i need to create service contracts with multiple validities.
some contracts may have 1 year validity, some six months.
I already have a transaction type for contract which is having 1 year validity period assigned in its date profile.
can i use the same transaction to create contracts for 6 months???
Regards,
PePe

Hi,
Yes you can use the same transaction type for the other validity period. What you can do is when you create a service contract, it will automatically pick up the 1 year duration since you have defined that way. But you can write some enhancement in ORDER_SAVE Badi.
First you create a Z table and maintain the different durations (say based on your item) in a Z table.
For example,
item    duration(months)
100       6
200       12
300       18
400       24
So at the time of saving the contract, your Badi implementation will be triggered and there you can pick up relevant duration (say 6 months) based on the item entered in your contract. And once you get the duration, you can change the Contract End date accordingly and then it will be saved. This way you can get the Contract duration as per your requirement.
Hope it HELPS...
Regards,
Shailesh Jadhav

PO Error in Process with Multiple account assignment

Hi ,
I am working with Extended Classsic scenario.
Problem is with PO with Multiple account assignement.
There is only one user who is getting problem with one particular account assignement "CCC" - Cost Center RP.. . When PO gets created with this particular AAC , it goes into "Error in process" only for one user.
In RZ20 it shows messsage as "Please enter quantity or percentage for account assignment" & "Distr. ind. and partial invoice ind. must be set f or multi acct. assgt.".
On other hand , other users are able to order the PO with the same AAC without any error.
What could be the reason behind this only for one user ?
Regards,
Sheetal

Hi ,
I have checked it intially and both are identical.
Initialy the problem was, user had entered 128 times AA line items ( added & deleted ) in the PO while in the SC it was having only 64.... Our system accepts line items till 99 , so i asked him to delete the items above 99 ..
So after that POs error has gone and it went for approval..
But after approval it again went into error in process
Sheetal

Undeleting a PO line item with multiple account assignment and PO history

I am getting error message
PO history already exists (Multiple account assignment not possible)
Message no. MEPO841
When attempting to undelete a purchase order line item that has GR (nonvaluated) and Invoice postings.
Sequence of events.
PO line item was created with mutlitple account assignments ( 50/50 distribution) and GR nonval flags on.
Invoice Posted (blocked for payment)
GR done
PO line item marked for deletion.
Now getting MEPO841 when attempting to undelete.
Tried to Reverse GR and cancel material docuement - unable to do so - message no selectable items in PO
(even with check zero indicator )

Hello Dan ,
Error message MEPO 841 is only issued if you have Multiple account assignment function (MAA) activated. Multiple account assignment function is a new business function developed in Release 604.
If you have MAA active, you are not allowed to change a single account assigned PO which has GR posted to a multiple accounts assigned PO. If this is tried , MEPO 841 will stop you from doing this change.
If you want to have your old functionality in the lower release, you should switch off the business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 ( MM Multiple Account Assignment ) in Release 604.
Please switch the business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 off in test environment and test the problem again in a productive system.
I hope this information has been helpful in solving your problem. Please let me know if you have any further questions.
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Frank Farinella

ERROR WHILE POSTING MIRO FOR MULTIPLE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT (ASSET)

Hi Guys,
We created a PO for asset with multiple account assignment. And we immediately do IR instead of GR.
While doing IR it is giving error
1) Quantity delivered is zero - Warning message
2) Account 245350 requires a Transaction Type or is Invalid - Error message
what may be the problem. how can we eliminate and post it
Regards
palani

Hi,
I would assume the G/L account you used was not properly set up. Did you get the same problem if you try to change to another G/L account? Perhaps, get your FI specialist to look into this G/L account-related error and verify it.
Cheers,
HT

Error while posting Customer with Multiple sales areas using DEBMAS05.

Dear experts,
We are generating IDOCS vis SAP DS for posting Customer master. The message type used is DEBMAS and basic type is DEBMAS05. we have a requirement to create 1 customer with multiple sales areas. However, we are ending up with a strange error: "Fill all required fields SAPMF02D 0111 ADDR1_DATA-NAME1". Despite the IDOC going into status 51, the customer gets created and the 1st sales area too. the 2nd sales area however is not created! The IDOC data definitely contains Name1, otherwise the customer would not have been created in the first place.
As the error message is related to the Address data, I also explored upon exploring this erorr further on the lines of Central Address management where in the ADRMAS and DEBMAS have to be passed together(IDOC Serialiization). OSS Note (384462) provides further details about this. One Important point from the note is:
"As you have to specify the logical name of the sending system among other things, SAP is not able to make any default settings in the standard systems. When you use the serialization groups delivered as a standard by SAP, the address objects are imported before the master objects.Thus the sequence address data before master objects must only be adhered to if one of the following points applies to your application:
Such fields are set as required entry fields that are only provided by the BAS in the Customizing of the customer or vendor master.
For your customers, contact persons exist to which a private address or a different business address is assigned.".
This is not the case in our situation, as we do not have required entry fields in customizing that are only provided by the BAS, so the error is all the more confusing and I am not too sure what the cause is.
If someone have experienced the same issue before and have found a solution to it, kindly help out.

I have found the cause and solution to this problem.
This error ”Fill all required fields SAPMF02D 0111 ADDR1_DATA-NAME1” and other similar errors like “Fill all required fields SAPMF02D 0111 ADDR1_DATA-SORT1“ which occurrs during the IDOC posting when there are more than one sales area or company code occurs when the customer number range is set up for Internal numbering. This means, that the number gets generated only at the time of save and upon debugging the IDOC, we found out that after creating the customer and the first sales area/company code record, the segment E1KNA1M is cleared completely! This is the reason, it throws an error which points to a mandatory KNA1 field as missing. (Like NAME1, SORT1 etc.)
This was resolved by splitting the IDOC into 2.
The solution is to First post only the KNA1 segment and create the customer.
In the second step, pass the IDOC with all other segments along with E1KNA1M, but pass only KUNNR in E1KNA1M and the rest of the fields in E1KNA1M as “/”: you would have got the KUNNR after the first step.
Important note: This requirement to split the IDOCs does not occur when the customer number is known upfront. (Meaning cases where the customer number is externally generated) I also tested this and created a customer with external numbering and I was able to post more than 1 sales area with the same IDOC.
I noticed multiple threads with the same issue, but none of it had a concrete answer. I hope this information will be useful for anyone facing similar problems.
Cheers
Venkat

Error creating a contract with multiple account assignments

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for