Non valuated Goods Receipt for materials with multiple account assignments

We have been using multiple a/c assignments for services on purchase orders for sometime with no issues. Recently we used a multiple a/c assignment distribution for a material P/O. this didn't work the same and the Goods Receipt was set as non valuated.
This leaves the cost showing as a commitment and we do not get any actual costs charged at the GR point until we get and post the invoice. This only happens with multiple account assignments, all material P/O goods receipts for single assignments get valuated.
Were not sure why this happens, and want it treated the same. Is there any way we can get these valuated the same way single assignment materials or multi assignment services are.
The non valuated GR flag is getting set automatically, but we can't see where this is coming from for this scenario, so were a bit stuck.
Any advice/direction would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Graham

Hi Deshamol, No the materials are all valuated, as mentioned, they all work fine when used as single a/c assignment.
Anupam, Your answer doesn't make sense to me, this is 1 line on the P/O, therefore 1 material. It can't be both valuated and none valuated for each a/c assignment.
I have read in a note there there is a business function that you can apply to get this working, has anybody tried it?
Thanks
Graham

Similar Messages

Non-valuated Goods Receipt for Purch.Order Item with multiple acct assgnt

Dears,
i used multiple account assignment functionality based on percentage for purchase order item and the system forced the goods receipt as "Non-valuated Goods receipt".
In this way i don't have FI-CO documents at Goods receipt; i got them only at Invoice verification. So i totally lose analysis on account "Invoice to Receive".
Please, give me some suggestion if you know something in matter.
Thanks in advance,
Regards
Enrico

It means that i didn't set non-valuated goods receipt.
The system automatically set the flag if more than one account assignment are used for one purchase order item.
If happens that just one account asignment is used for one purchase order item then the goods receipt is still valuated.
i didn't try so far with quantity instead of percentage but, anyway, i need to use percentage.

Partial goods receipt for PO with multiple line items

Hello All,
While doing MIGO, for a PO with multiple line items, if one line item is having error, will we be able to go ahead with goods receipt? Or entire material document is blocked for doing MIGO?
We will be doing a development - in case if there is problem in goods receipt (checking of any parameter, and if it is missing - we will be posting error message)...is it possible to ahead with next line item and still post the material document?
If partial goods receipt if possible for PO with multiple line items, how do we do it?
Regards,
RJS

Hi
While doing MIGO, for a PO with multiple line items, if one line item is having error, will we be able to go ahead with goods receipt? Or entire material document is blocked for doing MIGO?
No. You cannot post the MIGO, if even one of the PO line item is having problem or giving error.
We will be doing a development - in case if there is problem in goods receipt (checking of any parameter, and if it is missing - we will be posting error message)...is it possible to ahead with next line item and still post the material document?
If you skip a line irem and do GR with next line item, how will you match quantity & value with the vendor Invoice at LIV ?
If partial goods receipt if possible for PO with multiple line items, how do we do it?
Partial goods receipt is possible for PO line items. That means, if PO has 100 qty for line item 1 then you can do GR for 50 now and 50 later depending on the vendors delivery.
Hope this is what you mean by "Partial Goods Receipt".
Edited by: Arun R on May 10, 2010 2:03 PM

Value mismatch in ME23N and MIRO for PO with multiple account assignments

Hello All,
I've a PO for indriect material procurement with no material master and I've a single PO item with Account Assignment Category as "K" (Cost Center) and Net Price as "1,357.91". Account Assignment has been distributed by percentage such that 50% goes to a cost center and the remaining 50% goes to another cost center.
When I do MIRO, the amount comes as "1.357,92". This is because, the actual PO price "1,357.91" is divided by 2 equal half due to multiple account assignment and the individual amount comes to 678.955. And this is rounded off to 678.96 and multiplied by 2 in MIRO and the final amount comes to "1357.92". So as you see, the variance between PO price and MIRO price is 0.01.
How to get rid of this variance? Can something be done to match the PO value and MIRO value the same?
Thanks for your inputs.
Sankar

HI Sankar,
This is a standard behaviour as Currencies with 2 decimals will be getting rounded off. One work around to avoid posting of Small differences in Invoices (DIF accounts) is to maually change the amount in the Account assignment in the Invoice line to match to PO line total.
Regards,
Kathir

Disadvantages of non-valuated goods receipt

Hello gurus,
we would like to use non-valuated goods receipts for purchasing of assets. I.e. the value of the asset is not posted to the asset account before invoice receipt.
Are there any disadvantages of non-valuated goods receipts that we do not understand yet?
Thank you
Alicia

Dear,
With this Material movements with reference to non-valuated project stock take place with out being valuated.
For example, when a material managed in a project stock is consumed by a network activity (goods issue for reservation), this does not cause actual costs for the activity and no postings are made in financial accounting.
The calculation of MRP networks determines that no planned costs for material components will be managed in the nonv-aluated project stock.
The stockholding WBS element is debited with the actual costs for the external procurement only when the goods or invoice receipt for purchased parts is posted to the project stock.
Nonvaluated project stock does not completely disclose the costs for the network activities or the assigned production orders.
If you implement the nonvaluated project stock, a meaningful cost object controlling is possible only on the level of the stockholding WBS elements or the entire project after period end closing.
Due to the disadvantages of the nonvaluated project stock, the valuated project stock was provided in SAP R/3 4.0 onwards. Network costing can determine, planned costs for material components to be managed in the valuated project stock.
Normally it is recommended that you implement the valuated project stock if this is permitted by the business process.
If this Non valuated stock indicator is ticked in the Purchase Order, then no financial posting is made at the time of posting a Goods Receipt.
The only posting would occur on Invoice Receipt.
It is commonly used for purchasing of fixed assets, because in most countries you do not post
the acquisition until you have the legal back-up in the form of the supplier's invoice.
Also, it is not desirable to post an estimated value (based on the GR) plus a correction
(based on the IR).
Whether should you used non-valuated Goods Receipts or not would certainly depends on your
company's financial policies.
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

PO with multiple account assignments - non valuated / valuated GR

Hi Experts,
If I create a PO for goods with multiple account assignments the GR will not be valuated, but if I do the same for a service PO the GR will be valuated.
What is the reason for this?
Thanks in advance,
Francisco Melo

Hi,
There is more of a qualitative response to the issue, rather than quantitative, If you go through SAP Note 204252 for GR of material it says that: "We have not implemented this function since users who post goods receipts would have to determine the distribution to individual account assignment items during partial deliveries. Generally, users cannot or should not determine this.
An automatic distribution also causes problems and is also not implemented due to technical reasons".
Means basically here a stores guy is doing GR and he maynot be competent enough to decide on the Account assignment front.
However in general the service entry sheet is filled by departments who have got the work done, and are aware of the account assignment for that work.
Hope this is helpful for you.
Regards
Chandra Shekhar

Non-valuated Goods Receipt

Hello Experts,
My client is using Special Purpose Ledger. While doing a Non Valuated Goods receipt we are not getting any Financial Postings and FI documents are generated at the time of IR, which is correct. But we are getting a single line spl posting at the time of GR.
So the question is when no FI document is getting generated for non valuated GR , why SPL document is getting generated?
Please share your experience if any of you has encountered such issues.
Regards,
Chandra

Hi Chandra,
FI-SL is - amongst others - meant for posting statistical entries using quantity values (see also: [Document Entry Directly in FI-SL|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/da/6ada3889432f48e10000000a114084/frameset.htm]).
Thus a SPL document is created for non-valuated goods receipts while FI documents can't be created without values unequal to zero.
I am still looking for a solution to disable the creation of those statistical SPL entries since we do not want them. Any idea, someone?
With best regards,
Duderama

BW Cubes for reporting of Goods Receipts for materials

Hi,
I need information regarding cubes, I beleive they will be from MM area, required to be installed to report on Goods receipt for materials and the associated amount Spend that will result from those receipts, including related charges and fees.
Please share the information.
Thanks,
Rajani

HI,
If you need to get only goods receipts at MM Side you should be aware of movement types generally 1* in your system to get their values and Quantities.
If you are going from FI Side you can have FI Document type WE for GR which will help you in getting the spend amount .
Hope this helps for you.
Thanks.
Arun

Effects of Goods Receipt for PO with A/C assignment to Network?

Dear All,
Does anyone know what is the effect in the system after I posted a Goods Receipt for a Purchase order item with account assignment to a Network (Project Systems).
The account assignment is 'N' in the Purchase Order.
Best Regards,
Junwen

hi,
i know only assignment with "P"
-> it has an effect of the Budget and liability
(values in table rpsco)
Andreas

Goods receipts for PO with RF solution

Hello Experts,
In our warehouse,we want to post goods receipts for purchase order through RF solution by scanning the PO# barcode.
Is that possible? If possible can we ask our vendors to have the Barcodes designed for each purchase order document which support SAP RF solution?
My users want to goods receive in automated RF process where he needs to scan barcode and receive it.Can any one explain me how we want to proceed?
Thanks in advance

Hey,
This is firstly going to involve the development of a custom RF transaction to allow for such functionality to be made available on an RF Device (handheld/truck mount).
The complexity of which depends upon whether you are then receiving into IM/ WM/ WM with Storage Unit Management or WM with Handling Unit Management.
The barcode itself, as supplied by the Vendor on any receiving documentation, simply needs to be in a format that can be recognised by your choice of RF Scanning Device.
Can you give us more information as to the level of Warehouse Build, as this will drive exactly how much development will be required for such a transaction?!
thanks,
A

Error creating a contract with multiple account assignments

Hallo,
I have created a PO agreement with a single account assignment on tr - ME31K.
If I open this agreement and open the account assignments for an item I'm able to press the "Change display" button. In the screen which is showed I'm able to set the distribution to set the distribution to 1 - Distribution on quantity basis. If I do so I get the following error message: " Enter Acc. ***. Block". The only thing I could do is set this indicator!. But when I set this indicator this indicator is resettled and the message appears again.
The thing I want to do is that it is possible to create a contract whit multiple account assignments.
Could any one say what is missing or what is wrong?
My SAP version is 47x110 SR1.
Kind regards,
Richard MeijnError creating a contract with multiple account assignments

Rahul,
The reason why I created a contract with a single Account Assignment is that it was not possible to save the document.
So I created a document for my example and want to change it to a multiple Account assignment. So I did the steps as described.
After adding a extra account line and pressing Enter I get the error message as described: "Enter Acc. ***. Block".
There must be a setting wring in the IMG but I don't know which one?
I have looked ad transaction "OME9" but couldn't see the cause.
Kind Regards,
Richard Meijn

Subsequent credit to PO with multiple account assignments

Good Morning -
In ECC 6.0 when posting a subsequent credit to a purchase order that has multiple account assignments, the posting adds a commitment back onto the purchase order. This works opposite of the subsequent credit that is posted to a purchase order that has a single account assignment. Is there a fix that does not allow the commitment to be added to the purchase order?
Thanks.
Dan Scott

Hi Dan,
I would advice you to have a look at notes 1494239 and 1432085.
And in case you enter new account assignment in MIRO (unplanned acc. ***) pls. read the notes 496557 and 1446793.
Kind regards,
Edit

GR done as Non Valuated Goods Receipt

Hy Gurus,
We have rescently implimented MTO for all our 3 manufactruing plants.Problem is, during the GR of Header Materials we have noticed that GR is done as Non Valuated - there is an automatick tick activated for Goods Receipt, Non Valuated in Goods Reeceipt tab of Process Order.Due to which Accounitng document is not generate and also Problem is occure during Order Sattlement.
Note :- This problem is found only for one Plant not for all 3 plants.
Regards,
sdn Creture

Hy Pravin,
Yes we are using Strategy 20 - Make to order.
Did you want to say that idnicaor is activated incase of MTO orders ? Is it OK?
Becuase some time it actviates automatcially (Valuation done as non valuated Sales order stock with Sattlemetn rule SDI) and some times not (sattelement done with rule MAT).
We have check all the related master data and configue but no solution found.
Regards,
sdn_creature (Jimmy)
Edited by: sdn_creature on Aug 9, 2008 8:13 AM

Good Receipt for PO With Network

Dear gurus,
I have a problem with Good Receipt PO with Network. How to make so just quantity with no value in inventory when i GR that PO?. But in same plant too we can GR PO without Network. so quantity and value enter in inventory.
Thx.

Hi,
When PO created for material in ME21N with Acc. *** . cat" N" or with any Acc. *** . cat and GR done, then during GR posting, it will hit respective G/L account related network or any cost object related as debited ( all cost loaded) and GR/IR clearing as credited.
If PO created as standard PO with material (if material valuated), then during GR, it will hit Inventory account as debited ( resulting quantity & value updated) and GR/IR clearing as credited.
Regards,
Biju K

PC WF - Agent Determination for Items with Multiple Account Assignment

Hello Gurus!
The quoted text below is from [SAP Help Documentation|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm70/helpdata/en/ad/d8fd25beb64bbe9d671f3199eb7edf/content.htm]. I haven't been able to find any further documentation on how to implement this feature. Is this something the system can do without any BAdI implementations? Has anybody implemented this? How can this be accomplished? We are on SRM 7.0.
"You can distribute costs across accounts by percentage, by quantity, or by value. If the responsibility for approving items according to given accounting data is divided between several approvers, the system can create one work item for each approver. The item can only receive the status Approved after each approver has approved it. As soon as one approver rejects an item, the item receives the status Rejected."
Regards,
Ramki.

Hi,
SAP does not provide the standard Badi implementation to achieve your business requirement.. but you can refer enhancement implementation /SAPSRM/BD_WF_AGENTS_SC where you can find badi implementation /SAPSRM/BD_WF_SC_RR_PGRP is similar..
Saravanan

Non valuated Goods Receipt for materials with multiple account assignments

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for