Error due to assets?

Hi,
Here i am attatching file regarding that exception.
This code will work on local machine,but not work from server.i got these errors.
My Directory Structure
http://ipaddress of server/reqtionary/src/assets.
reqtionary is my project name.
under src folder one folder is there is css.It contains skinPreview.css
The code inside that css file is below
@font-face
    src:                    url("../assets/fonts/Framd.TTF");-------Here that error will be occured.
                                                                             i will try this path(http://ipaddress/reqtionary/src/assets/fonts/Framd.TTF) in that url.
    fontFamily:             franklin1;                                Then also i got the errors.
    font-anti-alias-type:     advanced;
    font-weight:             normal;
@font-face
    src:                    url("../assets/fonts/FRABK.TTF");
    fontFamily:             franklin;
    font-anti-alias-type:     advanced;
    font-weight:             normal;
plz help me.
Its very urgent.
Regards
D.Mahesh Babu

I had a similar issue a year or two ago. I would think that removing the ".." would at least make the errors in Flex Builder go away. I have a project setup with a /src/assets folder where I just use /assets to refer to the font.
I'm confused about what you mean by that code working locally but not remotely--if you're getting errors in Flex Builder how is it working locally if it's not even compiling? (Did you mean to say the reverse?) Are you using the mxmlc Ant task to build and test locally?

Similar Messages

Fixed asset error: 21151: error while posting asset document: '100000039'

Hello Experts,
How are you? We have a client who have encountered an error during fixed asset retirement thru scrappingu2026.In one retirement document, SAP did not assign an account in the account column but still the document was saved but with erroru2026On her next retirement document, she could no longer save her document and the error points to the last retirement document she has saved with error. We have tried to cancel the document and its journal entry but still she could no longer retire assets using scrapping. All other retirement transaction using scrapping could not be saved.
The client is using SAP B1 8.81 patch 5.
Thanks and best regards,
Luz

hi Luz Cornejo,
please do check this SAP Note: [1246921|https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/sno/ui_entry/entry.htm?param=69765F6D6F64653D3030312669765F7361706E6F7465735F6E756D6265723D3030303132343639323126]
regards,
Fidel

FA Retirement- 21151: error while posting asset document: '100000039'

Hello Experts,
I have a client who encountered this error during fixed asset retirement - scrapping.
After selecting the asset to be retired, sap did not assign an account in the account column, but the user
was able to save the document. After saving it, the user needs to retire again another asset - scrapping, but the document would not be saved because of this error: 21151: error while posting asset document '100000039'. The document number the systems is referring to is the last document saved but sap did not assign an account code.
Please help. My client is using sap b1 8.81 patch5.
Regards,
Luz

Hi Too Mui Hwee,
What we did is to put letters on the number so the series will continue example there is already 100333, 100334, 100335 since the error is encountered from 100333. We add 100333A, 100334A, 100335A.
Thanks

Error occurs during Asset Master Record Creation.

Hello SAP Gurus,
The error occurs during asset master record creation.
Our fiscal year variant is Z6 (July to June). The asset was acquired in June 15 (previous fiscal year) but was only set up on July 30 (this fiscal year) . When we put the depreciation start date as 15 June the error appeared. While saving the Asset master we are getting below error.
We tried the same with Post Capitalization of Asset (ABNAN) there also we are getting same error.
ERROR: - as below
u2003
SYST: *You cannot determine the period for rule 02 to 05.08.08 ( todayu2019s date )*
*Message no. AA613*
*Diagnosis*The system could not determine a depreciation period on 05.08.08 for period control 02 of the period control method of phase N1 of depreciation key INTERN-00001-0000.
Procedure
Maintain the assignment of the periods for the period control entered.
Proceed
If the period control you entered is a standard period control, you can assign the periods automatically.Proceed
Please find enclosed attachment for clear description of the error.
Please share your experiences regarding this subject.
Thanking you in anticipation.
Regards,
Suresh.
09986375966

Hi,
have you generated the period controls properly? If not, the error is raised correctly by the system.
To generate period controls go to:
IMG Asset Accounting -> Depreciation -> Valuation Methods -> Period Control -> Generate Period Controls / or you can use OA84
Regards,
Markus

I'm trying to burn a dvd from idvd but I keep getting error message, broken assets, but when I check my drop zones and their content there's no error messages on any of them?

I'm trying to burn a dvd from idvd but I keep getting error message, broken assets, but when I check my drop zones and their content there's no error messages on any of them?

Hi
And if You change view - in main "window/view field" so that You see the box-plot structure.
No exclamation marks there either ?
and non at the front page ?
iDVD do not copy Your material - only points to where it is stored. So if on any external hard disks, USB-memories, CDs or DVDs are missing - assetts are broken.
Or if You changed location of any material or directed iPhoto or iTunes or GarageBand to a new Library - Then iMovie/iDVD also get's lost.
Yours Bengt W

Dealing with errors due to newly added/dropped columns

DB version:11g
I am not sure if i have created an unnecessarily large post to explain a simple issue. Anway, here it is.
I have been asked to code a package for Archiving .
We'll have two schemas;The original schema and an Archive schema (connected via a DB Link)
ORIGINAL Schema -------------------------> ARCHIVE Schema
               via DB Link          When records of certain tables in the ORIGINAL schema meet the archiving criteria (based on Number of Days Old, Status Code etc), it will be moved ('archived') to the ARCHIVE schema using the INSERT syntax
insert into arch_original@dblink
col1,
col2,
col3,
select col1,
col2,
col3,
from original_tableThe original table and its archive table has the same structure, except that the Archive table has an additional column called archived_date which just records when a record got archived.
create table original
col1 varchar2(33),
col2 varchar2(35),
empid number
create table arch_original
col1 varchar2(33),
col2 varchar2(35),
empid number,
archived_date date default sysdate not null
);We have tables with lots of columns(there are lots of tables with more than 100 columns) and when all column names are explicitly listed like the above syntax, the code becomes huge.
Alternative Syntax:
So i thougt of using the syntax
insert into arch_original select original.*,sysdate from original; -- sysdate will populate archived_date columnEventhough the code looks simple and short, i've noticed a drawback to this approach.
Drawback:
For the next release, if developers decide to add/drop a column in the ORIGINAL table in the Original Schema, that change should be reflected in the archive_table's (ARCHIVE schema) DDL script as well. It is practically impossible to keep track of all these changes during the development phase.
If i use
insert into arch_original select original.*,sysdate from original; syntax, you will realise that there is change in the table structure only when you encounter an error(due to missing/new column) in the Runtime. But, if you have all the column names listed explicitly like
insert into arch_original@dblink
(col1,
col2,
col3,
select col1,
col2,
col3,
from original_tablethen you'll encounter this error during the Compilation itself. I prefer the error due to a missing/new column during the Compilation itself rather than in Runtime.
So what do you guys think? I shouldn't go for
insert into arch_original select original.*,sysdate from original; syntax because of the above Drawback. Right?

What advantage would it bring if i make ARCHIVED_DATE as the first column in the ARCHIVE tables?The advantage is that if you'll add a column in the future on both original and archived tables the insert statement will work anyway...
SQL> create table x (a number, b number);
Table created.
SQL> create table y (arc_date date, a number, b number);
Table created.
SQL> insert into x values (1,1);
1 row created.
SQL> insert into x values (2,2);
1 row created.
SQL> select * from x;
         A          B
         1          1
         2          2
SQL> insert into y select sysdate, x.* from x;
2 rows created.
SQL> alter table x add (c number);
Table altered.
SQL> alter table y add (c number);
Table altered.
SQL> alter table x drop column b;
Table altered.
SQL> alter table y drop column b;
Table altered.
SQL> insert into x values (3,3);
1 row created.
SQL> insert into y select sysdate, x.* from x
2 where a=3;
1 row created.
SQL> select * from x;
         A          C
         1
         2
         3          3
SQL> select * from y;
ARC_DATE           A          C
25-JAN-10          1
25-JAN-10          2
25-JAN-10          3          3Max
[My Italian Oracle blog|http://oracleitalia.wordpress.com/2010/01/23/la-forza-del-foglio-di-calcolo-in-una-query-la-clausola-model/]
Edited by: Massimo Ruocchio on Jan 25, 2010 12:44 PM
Added more explicative example

Printing error due to out of memory condition...

hi i got this problem of "printing error due to out of memory condition" and i cannot save it as a pdf file too. How to solve this prob? i using cs3 and acro 9.. pls help me... got a proj due and cannot afford to waste too much time...

I've also seen this error message for the first time today "printing error due to out of memory condition" - I have 2GB of RAM, 300Gb+ free on my hard drive and have closed all other programs that were using some memory, however have had no problems printing to pdf ever before in Indesign... is there a solution to this problem?

Error due to out of memory condition

Hi,
system: Windows XP, 2 GM RAM, Indesign CS3
I placed two files in Indesign: the first is .ai (1.1 MB, probably exported form a CAD program), the second is .psd (53 MB). When I try to print to .ps file, Indesign displays the message: "Export error: error due to out of memory condition". If I: 1. export to PDF, everything is OK, 2. rasterize .ai in Photoshop, then import the resulting .psd to Indesign, print to .ps file is OK.
Does somebody has an answer to my problem?

My gues is "mistakes" was referred to simply not outputting as intended by the designer. I had output issues when going directly to PDF and had to also continue the old way of doing thinkgs by outputting to .ps then distill to PDF. The "mistakes" that occured for me were nearly unnoticed. The publication was a 128+4 product catalog that had a header at the top of each page. I never had any problems outputting in the past. At the time, I just had updated to CS3 (XP Pro SP3 Dual Core 4 gigs ram). I was advised that outputting directly to PDF had been durastically improved. I output my files without "mistakes" or errors, or so I thought. After proofing, I didn't realize that all of the drop shadows for the header headline were not applied. The problem though, wasn't that they were applied to all headers, just beginning at page 60 or so, halfway through. After getting the finished publication back, I didn't notice it for a few months. After noticing it, I investigated. Several troubleshooting hours later (after forum posts and other expert help), I/we concluded that it was simply a program deficiency. During my trouble shooting, I looked at several areas mainly focusing on the transparency settings. I output the document several times. I finally exported each page separately and found that that was the only way that I could output every page to include the dropshadow in each header page (past page 60 or so).
I have been past that issue for a while now. Now I am on Win 7, Quad core, 6 gigs of ram, and don't have the outputting problem that I used to. Now I occasionally get this "Error due to out of memory condition" which is BS because my hardware specs are beyond reasonable for what I typically create in my workflow. Most of the time, my memory is only at about half of its capacity when I get this error. Not when I have a PS open with a large multipage file that I am working on. My out of memory error happens during file output or just when performing ordinary layout functions in InDesign.
When on my personal computer (Aluminum iMac 2.4 Core2 duo, 4 gigs of ram, 512 video, CS4 & CS5) I have neither of the above issues.

Import error due to character set difference?

hi,
hoping anyone to explain reason for the following import error.
here's the situation,
- export client used WE8MSWIN1252 charset (release v10.02.01)
- import server used WE8ISO8859P1 charset (release v10.1.0.4)
all tables appeared to be imported without error, except that import terminated unsuccesfully due to oracle error 2248
"ALTER SESSION SET PLSQL_OPTIMIZE_LEVEL =1 NLS-LENGTH_SEMANTICS = 'BYTE' PLSQL_CODE_TYPE = 'INTERPRETED' PLSQL_DEBUG = FALSE PLSQL_WARNING = 'DISABLE:ALL' PLSQL_CCFLAGS =''"
ORA-02248: invalid option for ALTER SESSION
was error due to the difference release version? char set conversion to non superset?
appreciate any help pls

It is difficult to say what is the current state of the database, so it is recommended to reexport and reimport the object definitions. You may miss some other stuff like object types, contraints, etc. Table data should be OK, so reexport should not include data.
As far as character sets are concerned, because of the difference between the export client character set and the import server character set, you may have lost some characters in the code range 0x80-0x9f. This includes Euro sign, TM, sign, "smart" quotes, en- and em-dash, etc. Use the Windows charmap.exe to see all the codes. If you have some of these codes in the source database, you have lost them on import (they got converted to the reverse quotation mark code 0xbf).
-- Sergiusz

Error: Due to a lock, query cannot be executed at the moment

Hi,
I am getting the following error when executing my query:
Error: Due to a lock, query cannot be executed at the moment
Abort System error in program SAPLRSDRC and form /BIC/ZABC_01
The query has been running fine for the past few months.
Can anyone explain why this error occured and what can I do to avoid this?
Thanks in Advance!!
Regards,
Swapna

Hi Swapna,
make sure that the BW system (e.g. another user, process, ...) does not have currently access to the data e.g. like maintain data. In this case the BW sets a lock so that the current user gets exclusively access to the table.
Check the table if there are any locks on it. Call transaction SU53 and check your table for any locks.
Check this thread, perhaps you will find some more information there:
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=3180428&messageID=1088573
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Marco

Function-based index error due to fine-grained security

Hi, i'm working on Oracle version 9.2.0.5.
I'm trying to create a function-based index but i'm getting an error due to fine-grained security. I checked resource_view but if i'm not wrong I should have all necessary roles. I also added xdbadmin to this user to be sure.
I tried also to alter my session but it didn't worked.
Connected to Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.5.0
Connected as test_ste
SQL>
SQL> create index fbidx_schede_xml
2 on schede_progetti_xml p
3 (p.PROGETTO.extract('/Project/Elenco_unita/Unita/Responsabile/Cognome/text()').getStringVal());
create index fbidx_schede_xml
on schede_progetti_xml p
(p.PROGETTO.extract('/Project/Elenco_unita/Unita/Responsabile/Cognome/text()').getStringVal())
ORA-28133: full table access is restricted by fine-grained security
ORA-06512: at "SYS.XMLTYPE", line 0
ORA-06512: at line 1
SQL>
SQL> alter session set query_rewrite_enabled = true;
Session altered
SQL> alter session set query_rewrite_integrity = trusted;
Session altered
SQL> create index fbidx_schede_xml
2 on schede_progetti_xml p
3 (p.PROGETTO.extract('/Project/Elenco_unita/Unita/Responsabile/Cognome/text()').getStringVal());
create index fbidx_schede_xml
on schede_progetti_xml p
(p.PROGETTO.extract('/Project/Elenco_unita/Unita/Responsabile/Cognome/text()').getStringVal())
ORA-28133: full table access is restricted by fine-grained security
ORA-06512: at "SYS.XMLTYPE", line 0
ORA-06512: at line 1
SQL> select * from user_role_privs;
USERNAME                       GRANTED_ROLE                   ADMIN_OPTION DEFAULT_ROLE OS_GRANTED
TEST_STE                      CONNECT                        NO           YES          NO
TEST_STE                      CTXAPP                         NO           YES          NO
TEST_STE                      RESOURCE                       NO           YES          NO
TEST_STE                      XDBADMIN                       NO           YES          NO
SQL> This are ACL on my schema:
<ACL>
    <acl description="Private:All privileges to OWNER only and not accessible to others" xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/xdb/acl.xsd" xmlns:dav="DAV:"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://xmlns.oracle.com/xdb/acl.xsd                           http://xmlns.oracle.com/xdb/acl.xsd">
      <ace>
        <principal>dav:owner</principal>
        <grant>true</grant>
        <privilege>
          <all/>
        </privilege>
      </ace>
    </acl>
</ACL>I tried to create a similar function-based index on Oracle 10.2.0.3 without any problem and without touching any ACL, is an Oracle 9.2.0.5 problem?
Thanks for your attention.

I didn't really (production wise)work yet with VPD. I know a lot is based on DBMS_RLS and I guess (IF it is VPD related) it should be to hard to find in the doc's how you could check what is beyond your privileges. As a DBA I noticed that even the dba account SYSTEM isn't always allow to export the full content for the tables anymore.
There is a privilege that grants you all access that you need, despite the fact that you are not allowed to read certain rows from a table. Look it up.
In all, as I said, it looks like account is not allowed to see all data from a table. In that respect it sounds logical that you also are, in that case, not allowed to build a function based index on that data

SAP RE-FX RERAPP - making Object Cash Flow posting while Partn.Rel. Cash flow gives Error (due to missing House Bank)

Hello Experts,
We have an issue with the Object Cash Flow makes postings while the Partner.Rel. Cash Flow gives an error due to missing House Bank in the Posting Parameters on the contract.
Result is an double/tripple etc. booking on the Object Cash Flow which not is showing on the Flow Overview in the contract and no booking on the Partner.Rel. Cash Flow.
This goes on until the missing House Bank is corrected.
We want to know if we can block the Object Cash Flow making definitive postings until the original Partner.Rel. Cash Flow is posted.
Hope to hear from you, thanks in advance!
Saskia Ismail

Hi.Saskia Ismail
You can think the 2-Type of posting procedure.
1. You just only manage 'Partner.Rel. Cash flow' of each condition & flow type.
    In this cases, you do not configure "Distribution Formula" on the "Condition type" configuration.
   (RECACUST>Conditions and Flows>Condition Types and Condition Groups)
2. You want to manage both of 'Partner.Rel. Cash flow' and 'Object Cash Flow'. but when you posting this cash flow, if you want to block the Object
   Cash Flow making, you can use 'Enhancements' of the 'RECACUST>Accounting>Automatically Generated Accounting
   Documents>Enhancements>Prevent Object Transfers' as below.
Prevent Object Transfers :
- You can use this BAdI if you want to suppress object transfers (transfer from the contract to assigned rental objects) during periodic posting.
- Implement the method SUPPRESS_TRANSFER_POSTING and set the parameter cf_suppress_transfer there to 'X'.
Regards,
Yeong Chul, Jeong

'Download Error' due to 'Unable to reach Adobe servers'.

I am getting a 'Download Error' due to 'Unable to reach Adobe servers'. I have already reconnected and disconnected my internet, and nothing has changed. How can I fix this problem? If anyone can help, I would truly be grateful. Thanks!
- Bobby Bobface

Not really a Premiere Pro problem, so moving this to the Downloading, Installing, Setting Up forum.
Re: Receiving error stating not able to access the Internet in Adobe Download Assistant

Error when processing asset under construction (AuC) for WBS element message no cj824

Hi,
i am getting error message when i change dates in activities.
Error when processing asset under construction (AuC) for WBS element
Message no. CJ 824
i have checked related post but did not find any solution. also check SAP Note but not related to my issue.
Please guide.
thanks
Sunil

Hi Ken,
Please check below screens:
according to this error message AUC has some missing field or some incorrect value. but when i checked via program RAUNVA00 which will display
Incomplete Assets - Detail List.
but this program does not return any incompleteness.
i found many threads and SAP Not but none of is related to my program. this problem comes when i change dates in activity and save the project.
Please suggest what to do now.
thanks
Sunil

CIF errors due to material status

Hi All,
We are having lot of CIF errors due to material status "40" in CIF, which restrict creation of P.reqs and PO at source location.
Eg:- LOC1 is a manufacturing location and LOC2 is a Distribution centre. A new Product A introduced at both location, having status status "40" at both the location.
When APO creates P.Reqs with source as LOC1 and Destination as LOC2 for this product, these p.reqs get stuck in CIF queue, as plant specific status "40" doesn't allow creation of P.Reqs at LOC1 in ECC.
We thought of creating a new status "Z1", which would allow the creation of P.Reqs and PO. But the requirement was to allow only creation of P.Reqs and not PO. But in the config setting in ECC for material status there is common setting for P.Reqs and PO and cannot be differentiated.
Have anybody come across such problem and whats the way to address this issue.
Thanks & Regards
Shankar

Hi Shankar,
Please check list of enahncements in SMOD transaction. The enhacements related to Purchase documents start with "CIFPUR.."
Or other path in SPRO is as below:
In the ERP system under Integration with Other SAP Components >> Advanced Planning and Optimization >> Application-Specific Settings and Enhancements >>Settings and Enhancements for External Procurement.
Because of the blocked status of the material ,while transferring the PR/PO data, the CIF prrogram -function call for creating the purchasing document does not get triggered. As written in earlier mail, the enhancement on SAP ECC inbound may not help, because, the material status is picked up from ECC ( or SAP R/3) material master data and not taken from APO.
Neverthless, you may please have a look at these enhancements.
I hope this gives insight to you.
Regards
Datta

Error due to assets?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for