Error Handling for Bundled Updates

HI,
Runtime errors can occur during execution of bundled updates. How are they handled?

HI,
In general, COMMIT WORK processing occurs in the following order:
1. All dialog-task FORM routines logged with PERFORM ON COMMIT are executed.
2. All high-priority (V1) update-task function modules are executed.
The end of V1-update processing marks the end of the change transaction. If you used COMMIT WORK AND WAIT to trigger commit processing, control returns to the dialog-task program.
3. All low-priority (V2) update-task function modules are triggered.
All background-task function modules are triggered.
Runtime errors can occur either in the system itself, or because your program issues an termination message (MESSAGE type ‘A’). Also, the ROLLBACK WORK statement automatically signals a runtime error. The system handles errors according to where they occur:
• in a FORM routine (called with PERFORM ON COMMIT)
Updates already executed for the current update transaction are rolled back.
(ii)No other FORM routines will be started.
(iii) No further update-task or background-task functions will be started.
(iv) An error message appears on the screen.
• in a V1 update-task function module (requested IN UPDATE TASK)
(i)Updates already executed for V1 functions are rolled back.
(ii)All further update-task requests (V1 or V2) are thrown away.
(iii)All background-task requests are thrown away.
(iv)Updates already executed for FORM routines called with PERFORM ON COMMIT are not rolled back.
(v)An error message appears on the screen, if your system is set up to send them
• in a V2 update-task function module (requested IN UPDATE TASK)
(i)Updates already executed for the current V2 function are rolled back.
(ii)All update-task requests (V2) still to be executed are discarded.
(iii) All background-task requests still to be executed are carried out.
(iv)No updates for previously executed V1 functions are rolled back.
(v)No updates previously executed for FORM routines (called with ON COMMIT) are rolled back.
(vi) An error message appears on the screen, if your system is set up to send them
• in a background-task function module (requested IN BACKGROUND TASK DESTINATION)
Background-task updates already executed for the current DESTINATION are not rolled back.
(ii) All further background-task requests for the same DESTINATION are thrown away.
(iii)Other previously executed updates are rolled back.
(iv)No error message appears on the screen.
If your program detects that an error in remote processing has occurred, it can decide whether to resubmit the requests at a later time.
For further information about RFC processing, refer to the Remote Communications documentation.
Reward Points if found helpfull..
Cheers,
Chandra Sekhar.

Similar Messages

  • Error Handling for Background/Update Tasks (Transfer Order creation) - How?

    Hi,
    I have a standard process for creating a Transfer Order and 2 user-exits that I have implemented.
    The user exits are used to transfer information during Transfer Order creation.
    However, the user-exits also check data in table TVARV and other. As such, error handling needs to be implemented, since the T.O. might or might not go through, depending on data validation and related.
    However, the user-exits are implemented during creation, which is an update task that runs in the background. This makes it impossible to output any information or error messages.
    What else can be done in regards to outputting a message, since the user will need to see some sort of message that the process failed, that the T.O. didnu2019t confirm?  Can an SAP inbox message be created and how?
    Please help.
    Thank You,
    John

    Hi,
         Please check the following link for all the function modules and user exits on TOs.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/EN/c6/f83a294afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/content.htm
    Reward points if it was helpful.
    Regards
    Abhishek
    Edited by: Abhishek Raj on May 29, 2008 10:20 AM

  • Option for error handling for DTP, ' no updata, no reporting" and "deactiva

    Hello Gurus,
         option for error handling for DTP, ' no updata, no reporting" and "deactivated" , please give some explanation and instance for them?
    Many Thanks,

    On the Update tab page, specify how you want the system to respond to data records with errors:
                                a.      No update, no reporting (default)
    If errors occur, the system terminates the update of the entire data package. The request is not released for reporting. However, the system continues to check the records.
                                b.      Update valid records, no reporting (request red)
    This option allows you to update valid data. This data is only released for reporting after the administrator checks the incorrect records that have not been updated and manually releases the request by setting the overall status on the Status tab page in the monitor (QM action).
                                c.      Update valid records, reporting possible
    Valid records can be reported immediately. Automatic follow-up actions, such as adjusting the aggregates, are also carried out.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_smehp1/helpdata/en/42/fbd598481e1a61e10000000a422035/content.htm
    Hope it helps.
    rgds, Ghuru

  • Error handling for work item

    Dear All,
         When I trigger my workflow from SWUE,the workflow containers must be populated with agent name.But it is populated only with 'US'.Please suggest.
         On the other hand, when I trigger my workflow from ME21N,the workflow goes into error.The error statement is "Exception occurred - Error handling for work item 000000954797".What is the problem?
        Please suggest the solution for which I will be grateful.
    Thanks and regards,
    S.Suresh

    Dear ,
    I use bus2012 as BOR and event as created.
    When I create purchase order from ME21N,bus2012 is not triggering.Instead FREBUS2012 gets triggered which is a subtype of bus2012.
    At SWETYPV,event linkage is activated only for BUS2012 and there is no entry at SWETYPV for FREBUS2012.
    Though I configured the workflow with start events:BUS2012->created,why FREBUS2012 should trigger my workflow which is not seen in SWETYPV?How to override it?Please suggest.
    There is no start conditions for my workflow.Whenever purchase order is created,this workflow should trigger.
    So,the parameters passed between even to workflow are 
    &_EVT_OBJECT&    ->        &BUS2012&
    &_EVT_CREATOR&   ->     & WFINITIATOR&
    Thanks and regards,
    S.Suresh

  • Error handling for a save button

    hi. how do i get error handling say in a button, and then to give an error to the user, without crashing the whole application. can any one point me to any articles, tried searching , and not finding wxactly what i am looking for. thanks.
    http://startrekcafe.stevesdomain.net http://groups.yahoo.com/groups/JawsOz

    hi. maybe i did not make my self clear. okay, here's how this button works, you have a open dialog button, and a open dialog box, you click the file, and it loads in the data grid. now you click on the save button, and a message says file was saved, need
    try / catch code, to catch this, if the file was not saved, or other errors, then a error friendly message, any code for this. read the article, but need a specific error handler for the save button, like i had for the open dialog file dialog box. any suggestions,
    or links, to look at sample code. thanks.
    http://startrekcafe.stevesdomain.net http://groups.yahoo.com/groups/JawsOz

  • Error handling for RGB values

    Hi
    I am having problems doing error handling for RGB values. I have a Java applet with 3 JTextFields whose values are parsed as int variables and stored as ints. If a value is entered that is not a value between 0 and 255 is entered, the appropriate field/s should be set to an empty string.
    The problem I am having is that I am using try/catch block to try to parse as an int but then it breaks out of execution completely.
    I hope this makes sense and that someone can help.
    Thanks!

    this is because your code is probably inside one giant try catch block, what you need to do is have small ones in places where you do the parsing.
    post code and i can show you how to modify it

  • Error Handling for loads using XI

    Hi,
    We are using XI to load data into BW. If we use flat file or R/3 in the infopackage we can go to the update tab-data update type in the data targets-error handling-valid records update reporting possible option. If we chose this then error records get into a seperate PSA and valid records get into the target. But this option is not available if data comes in RSA7 through XI and then loaded. Only the option no update no reporting is available.So all the records get into the same PSA. Can anyone tell me how to handle this?

    this is because your code is probably inside one giant try catch block, what you need to do is have small ones in places where you do the parsing.
    post code and i can show you how to modify it

  • Error Handling for Outbound IDOC - COSMAS (Cost Center Master)

    Hi,
    I need to trigger a mail to SAP inbox whenever a outbound idoc fails for any reason.
    I know how to do it for inbound or outbound transaction data, but not sure how to do error handling for outbound master data.
    Could one of you help me understand the same.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Vinoth

    Hey Vinoth,
    Do you want decide the recipient of the mail dynamically? am asking because if you give the USER NAME in the partner profile and when ever a IDOC fails a mail will automatically reach the user inbox automatically
    let me know if i answered ur question.
    Thanks,
    Santhosh

  • HT1338 I am getting an error message for the Update store, saying "To Update this application, sign in to the account you used to purchase it."

    I am getting an error message for the Update store, saying "To Update this application, sign in to the account you used to purchase it."  how do I get rid of these Old unneccisary Updates?  anyone?

    Welcome to Apple Communities
    What's this app? You need to use another Apple ID to update it

  • Latest Error Handling for Dynamic Actions

    Is there any documentation on the Latest Error Handling for Dynamic Actions?

    BillC,
    Interesting that I was looking around for the same thing after seeing a Foreign Key violation in my application.
    I found this article by Patrick Wolf:
    APEX 4.1 – Error Handling Improvements – Part 1
    http://www.inside-oracle-apex.com/apex-4-1-error-handling-improvements-part-1/
    I believe you need to be on 4.1 or later though.
    Thanks,
    Joe

  • 3.2 to 4.1 Upgrade - Error Handling for Unavailable Database Links

    Hi,
    I'm having a 3.2 -> 4.1 upgrade issue related to error handling for failed database links.
    I have a conditional Exists button on a page that has a SQL query to linked tables. However, for the 10 minutes every day where the target of the database link is getting a cold backup, the query fails. In the old 3.2 apex I simply got an error inside the region where the button is located but otherwise the page was still visible:
    "Invalid exists/not exists condition: ORA-02068: following severe error from MYDBLINK ORA-01034: ORACLE not available ORA-27101: shared memory realm does not exist"
    However, in apex 4.1.0.00.32 I get the following unhandled error, and clicking "OK" takes me to the edit page when logged in as developer.
    i.e., the page can't be run at all while the database links are failing in this one region.
    Error Error processing condition.
    ORA-12518: TNS:listener could not hand off client connection
    Technical Info (only visible for developers):
    is_internal_error: true
    apex_error_code: APEX.CONDITION.UNHANDLED_ERROR
    ora_sqlcode: -12518
    ora_sqlerrm: ORA-12518: TNS:listener could not hand off client connection
    component.type: APEX_APPLICATION_PAGE_REGIONS
    component.id: 4
    component.name: Current Alerts
    error_backtrace:
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.WWV_DBMS_SQL", line 1041
    ORA-06512: at "APEX_040100.WWV_FLOW_DYNAMIC_EXEC", line 687
    ORA-06512: at "APEX_040100.WWV_FLOW_CONDITIONS", line 272
    General users see this:
    Error Error processing condition.
    ORA-01034: ORACLE not available ORA-02063: preceding line from MYDBLINK
    clicking "OK" takes user to another page, not sure how apex decides which, but not a concern at the moment.
    I've done a search and read the page http://www.inside-oracle-apex.com/apex-4-1-error-handling-improvements-part-1/ but the new apex error handling isn't clear to me, and I don't know if the apex_error_handling_example provided on that page would be applicable to this situation.

    Thanks Patrick.
    The PL/SQL Function Body returning boolean condition with:
    begin
        for l_check in (
          SELECT 1
           FROM myview@MYDBLINK
          WHERE ... ) loop
            return true;
        end loop;
        return false;
    exception when others then
        sys.htp.p('Invalid exists/not exists condition: ' || sys.htf.escape_sc(sqlerrm));
        return false;
    end; Resulted in a similar issue:
    Error Error processing condition.
    ORA-04052: error occurred when looking up remote object MYLINKUSER.myview@MYDBLINK
    ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 3
    ORA-01033: ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress
    ORA-02063: preceding line from MYDBLINK
      Technical Info (only visible for developers)
    is_internal_error: true
    apex_error_code: APEX.CONDITION.UNHANDLED_ERROR
    ora_sqlcode: -4052
    ora_sqlerrm: ORA-04052: error occurred when looking up remote object MYLINKUSER.myview@MYDBLINK
    ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 3
    ORA-01033: ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress
    ORA-02063: preceding line from MYDBLINK
    component.type: APEX_APPLICATION_PAGE_REGIONS
    component.id: 4
    component.name: Current Alerts
    error_backtrace:
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.WWV_DBMS_SQL", line 904
    ORA-06512: at "APEX_040100.WWV_FLOW_DYNAMIC_EXEC", line 588
    ORA-06512: at "APEX_040100.WWV_FLOW_CONDITIONS", line 148However, I created a view with the same query:
    CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW v_localview (ALERT_1)
    AS
    SELECT 1
      FROM myview@MYDBLINK ...then change the condition to look at the local view:
    begin
        for l_check in (
          select alert_1 from v_localview ) loop
            return true;
        end loop;
        return false;
    exception when others then
        sys.htp.p('Invalid exists/not exists condition: ' || sys.htf.escape_sc(sqlerrm));
        return false;
    end;As a view is simply a query I'm surprised this should make any difference but it now looks similar to the 3.2 error, inside the region, when the linked database gets its morning cold backup, and this is fine:
    Invalid exists/not exists condition: ORA-12518: TNS:listener could not hand off client connection

  • Error 1706 for Adobe Updater

    Keep getting Error 1706 for Adobe Updater.  What is it and what can I do to fix it?

    Hi,
    I'm assuming your having troubles installing the 2.0.3 runtime?  If so, can you please try the instructions in this post?
    Thanks,
    Chris

  • Error handling for master data with direct update

    Hi guys,
    For master data with flexible update, error handling can be defined in InfoPackege, and if the load is performed via PSA there are several options - clear so far. But what about direct update...
    But my specific question is: If an erroneous record (e.g invalid characters) occur in a master data load using direct update, this will set the request to red. But what does this mean in terms of what happens to the other records of the request (which are correct) are they written to the master data tables, so that they can be present once the masterdata is activated, or are nothing written to masterdata tables if a single record is erroneous???
    Many thanks,
    / Christian

    Hi Christian -
    Difference between flexible upload & Direct upload is that direct upload does not have Update Rules, direct upload will have PSA as usual & you can do testing in PSA.
    second part when you load master data - if error occurs all the records for that request no will be status error so activation will not have any impact on it i.e. no new records from failed load will be available.
    hope it helps
    regards
    Vikash

  • Error handling for distributed cache synchronization

    Hello,
    Can somebody explain to me how the error handling works for the distributed cache synchronization ?
    Say I have four nodes of a weblogic cluster and 4 different sessions on each one of those nodes.
    On Node A an update happens on object B. This update is going to be propogated to all the other nodes B, C, D. But for some reason the connection between node A and node B is lost.
    In the following xml
    <cache-synchronization-manager>
    <clustering-service>...</clustering-service>
    <should-remove-connection-on-error>true</should-remove-connection-on-error>
    If I set this to true does this mean that the Toplink will stop sending updates from node A to node B ? I presume all of this is transparent. In order to handle any errors I do not have to write any code to capture this kind of error .
    Is that correct ?
    Aswin.

    This "should-remove-connection-on-error" option mainly applies to RMI or RMI_IIOP cache synchronization. If you use JMS for cache synchronization, then connectivity and error handling is provided by the JMS service.
    For RMI, when this is set to true (which is the default) if a communication exception occurs in sending the cache synchronization to a server, that server will be removed and no longer synchronized with. The assumption is that the server has gone down, and when it comes back up it will rejoin the cluster and reconnect to this server and resume synchronization. Since it will have an empty cache when it starts back up, it will not have missed anything.
    You do not have to perform any error handling, however if you wish to handle cache synchronization errors you can use a TopLink Session ExceptionHandler. Any cache synchronization errors will be sent to the session's exception handler and allow it to handle the error or be notified of the error. Any errors will also be logged to the TopLink session's log.

  • Best error handling for visa calls?

    We are using some handlers we've devloped for power supply handling (over GPIB). The power supplies are SCPI and use SCPI/GPIB commands. The handlers use the NI visa api's Read() and Write() functions to send the commands.  They work fine, for the most part, and we've been using them for a number of years.
    However, we're hearing reports that there may have been a few times that commands were not executed on the power supply and our handler did not report back any error.
    So, I'm trying to update these handlers to add a little error checking to make them more robust and hopefully we'll catch this error if it happens again.
    For error handling, I've come up with 3 solutions and tried all 3. I find some benefits and drawbacks with each and hoped I could get your opinions about error handling as I'm not overly familiar with some of the methods.
    Method 1:
    Set the Event Status Enable register to catch all events (or all that I care about).
    Read status byte (STB?) after each command and check the event bit and then event status bit if event bit set.
    Drawback1: I have one power supply that does not implement this correctly and a second type that appears to not be working correctly either.
    Drawback2: Errors are generic. I'll know if I got, for example, a DDE (Device Dependant Error), but I won't know more detail than that.
    Method 2:
     After each command sent, read the error queue with the System:Error? query.
    Drawback: It seems I get a lot of messages back in this method that aren't real errors. It's very "noisy" and I have no way to distinguish real errors from "noise" messages like "query interrupted" and such.
    Method 3:
    Check the return code of the Visa Read() and Write() commands. At first I didn't think this was very robust, but after seeing the list of errors here, I'm beginning to think that these might be more robust and detailed than Method 1. However, I'm not sure.
    So is method 3 as robust as it looks, or is there a combination/comprimise I can make, or another method I did not mention which is best to trap errors from Visa Reads/Writes to these GPIB power supplies? Keep in mind that the handlers work for a number of different power supplies and its likely that some things may be implemented differently between supplies....so its best to stick with somethind standard that will work on all power supplies.

    Hi KingTermite,
    I hope you will got answer of the question and may be implemeted something .It was really a nice discussion .I am also facing the same issue where I am communicating with different instrument using  GPIB communication and RS 232 too.
    Can you share and discuss about the implementation of your initiative.
    Best Regards
    Regards:
    Vaibhav Kanchan
    Sr. Engineer
    NI Certified LabVIEW Developer(CLD)
    NI Certified TestStand Developer(CTD}

Maybe you are looking for