Error in cenvat Assignment.

We find that when multiple PO's are selected for Invoice Verification in a Single MIRO Transaction, the Assignment Column of Cenvat Clearing Account No: 135600 gets populated with the last PO number given rather than the corresponding PO Numbers for all the line items.I  mention In  that the GR/IR line items are correct in the assignment column, but the cenvat is not OK for the assignment column? we maintain "Substain" for Assignment Po in miro.For any related Patch and Give the soluation to this.

Hi,
Go to RSRV and check the integrity of SID under elementary tests and under masterdata for that characteristic.
Regarding editing in PSA, there are two ways first load it to PSA only and then simulate update and see if there are any errors. second, if you have already loaded it to the datatarget delete the request from it and then you'll be able to edit the records in PSA.
Hope this helps
Assign points if useful
Regards,
venkat

Similar Messages

  • Error while updating assignment of Contingent resource

    Hi,
    I am getting the below error while updating Assignment of contingent resource using the Standard API.
    ORA-20001: HR_7949_ASG_DIF_SYSTEM_TYPE: N, SYSTYPE, ACTIVE_CWKCode for updating the record is -
    Declare
    Cursor c_emp_mig
    Is
    Select person_id, supervisor_person_id, code_comb_id, sob,  assignment_id, assignment_number From  customContingentTable;
      x_person_id number;
    x_validate BOOLEAN := FALSE;
    x_supervisor_id number;
    x_default_code_comb_id number;
    x_set_of_books_id number;
    x_assignment_id number;
    x_assignment_number varchar2(20);
    x_manager_flag char(1):='N';
    x_comment_id number;
    x_concatenated_segments varchar2(80);
    x_no_managers_warning boolean ;
    x_cagr_concatenated_segments VARCHAR2(80);
    x_soft_coding_keyflex_id NUMBER; --- IN OUT
    x_other_manager_warning boolean;
    x_object_version_number NUMBER;
    x_cagr_grade_def_id  NUMBER;
    x_effective_date DATE :='01-OCT-2011'; --cut off date from which the assignment will be effective
    x_effective_start_date DATE  :='01-OCT-2011';--cut off date from which the assignment will be effective
    x_effective_end_date   DATE;
    x_hourly_salaried_warning boolean;
    x_org_now_no_manager_warning boolean;
    x_error_code varchar2(240);
    x_error_desc varchar2(2000);
    Begin
       Open c_emp_mig;
       Loop
       Fetch c_emp_mig Into x_person_id, x_supervisor_id, x_default_code_comb_id, x_set_of_books_id, x_assignment_id, x_assignment_number;
       Exit when c_emp_mig%NOTFOUND;
        x_object_version_number:=1;
        hr_assignment_api.update_cwk_asg(
         p_validate => x_validate
         ,p_effective_date => x_effective_date
         ,p_datetrack_update_mode => 'UPDATE'
         ,p_assignment_id => x_assignment_id
         ,p_assignment_status_type_id => 1
         ,p_assignment_number =>x_assignment_number
         ,p_object_version_number => x_object_version_number
         ,p_default_code_comb_id => x_default_code_comb_id
         ,p_set_of_books_id => x_set_of_books_id
         ,p_supervisor_id=>x_supervisor_id
         ,p_manager_flag=>x_manager_flag
         ,p_concatenated_segments => x_concatenated_segments
         ,p_soft_coding_keyflex_id => x_soft_coding_keyflex_id
         ,p_comment_id => x_comment_id
         ,p_effective_start_date => x_effective_start_date
         ,p_effective_end_date => x_effective_end_date
         ,p_no_managers_warning => x_no_managers_warning
         ,p_other_manager_warning => x_other_manager_warning
         ,p_hourly_salaried_warning=>x_hourly_salaried_warning 
         ,p_org_now_no_manager_warning=>x_org_now_no_manager_warning
          End Loop;
       Exception When Others Then
             x_error_code:=SQLCODE;
             x_error_desc:=SQLERRM;
            insert into emp_mig_error(error_code, error_desc) values(x_error_code, x_error_desc);  
         Close c_emp_mig;
      End;   Am I missing something here? I searched in metalink, there is no mention of this error. Can anyone help?
    Regds,
    ARS

    The relevant parameter to identify an individual will be p_assignment_id.
    You will need a query to obtain the relevant assignment_id from the given CWK number on the person row
    Edited to add : whilst you are about it, you'll need to obtain the assignment object_version_number as well - that will be needed for the p_object_version_number parameter
    Edited by: clive_t on 05-Apr-2012 16:10

  • Error V1134, account assignment error during PO creation

    Hello All,
    I am facing one issue while creating a purchase order w.r.t. PR. My scenario is mentioned below...
    1) A sales order is created for a part w.r.t. quantity contract
    2) PR is created w.r.t. a sales order
    3) I am trying to create a purchase order w.r.t. PR however while creating PO, system is giving following error
    Error: V1134, Account assignment cannot be carried out because of different origin no.
    Can you please help me figure out why system is giving error and how to resolve this.
    Thanks in advance.
    With regards.
    Sanjay

    Hello Arminda,
    Thank you for your prompt response. However, I have one doubt, this note is applicable up to ECC 5.00 and we are working on  SAP ECC 6.0 version. Can this note be applicable to us.
    Please revert.
    Thank you again.
    With regards.
    Sanjay

  • Purchase Order Error in account assignment

    Hi all,
    I am running SRM 7.0 Extended Classic scenario for the creation of purchase orders.
    Purchase Orders are correctly created in SRM and passed to ECC in our DEV system. But in our QAS system we are getting the following error in SRM Purchase Order:
    BBP_PD 822 Error in account assignment for item 1
    Any idea what I am missing in the QAS system?
    Thanks
    Ezequiel

    Hi Jay, thanks for the explanation,
    From our customer message SAP answered us that the error is coming from a Finance Validation that is checking that the field Segment (COBL-SEGMENT) in the Account assignment is filled with a value.
    The call stack is the following:
    13          FUNCTION     BBP_PD_MSG_ADD     SAPLBBP_PDH_MSG
    12          FORM     COBL_CHECK_ALL     SAPLBBP_PDACC
    11          FORM     ACCOUNT_MAINTAIN_ALL_RECORDS     SAPLBBP_PDACC
    10          FORM     ACCOUNT_F_CHECK     SAPLBBP_PDACC
    9          FUNCTION     BBP_ACCOUNT_CHECK     SAPLBBP_PDACC
    8          FORM     ITEM_F_CHECK_FROM_WTAB     SAPLBBP_PDIAD
    7          FORM     ITEMLIST_F_CHECK     SAPLBBP_PDIAD
    6          FUNCTION     BBP_ITEMLIST_CHECK     SAPLBBP_PDIAD
    5          FORM     PROCDOC_DB_CHECK     SAPLBBP_PD
    4          FORM     PROCDOC_CHECK     SAPLBBP_PD
    3          FUNCTION     BBP_PROCDOC_CHECK     SAPLBBP_PD
    2          FORM     DISPLAY_DOCUMENT     BBP_PD
    1          EVENT     ATUSER-COMMAND     BBP_PD
    In form COBL_CHECK_ALL, error message is coming from calling function 'META_ACCSERV_CHECKACCASSIGNMT'
      CALL FUNCTION 'META_ACCSERV_CHECKACCASSIGNMT'
        EXPORTING
          logical_system  = p_com-logsys_fi
        TABLES
          bbp_cobl        = t_cobl
          exp_cobl        = t_new_cobl                    "note 202684
          return          = t_return
          control_record  = control_record.
    I think we have two ways to solve it:
    1. If we manage to deactivate somehow this error in SRM, then when PO is generated the value will be mapped from PR in ECC.
    2. This field Segment is not available in customizing for account assignments for SRM (table BBP_V_C_ACCFC). Is it any way to have it in SRM?
    Can you suggest please,
    Many thanks,
    Thanks,
    Ezequiel

  • In COGI error text "Multiple assignment of line item"

    Hi Guru,
    In COGI error text "Multiple assignment of line item"
    Description:
    ultiple assignment of a line ID
       Message no. M7357
    iagnosis
       An item table, in which the line ID (LINE_ID)
       was transferred to the function module MB_CRE
    ystem Response
       Processing is terminated.
    rocedure
       Contact the system administration.
    rocedure for System Administration
       There is an error in the calling application.
    Please help me to resolved this issue.
    Thanks and regards
    PNU

    Hi,
    Thanks for reply,
    It is possible to remove material from COGI list. We need to stop creation of this error.
    Is there other solution to control creation of error  "Multiple assignment of line item"
    Thanx & regd.
    PNU

  • Error:System not assigned to a host

    Hi,
    I am trying to download maintenance stk SRM 7.0 SPS 5.0, via solman, but I am getting the error called  "Error:System not assigned to a host" in the stage where solman looks for OS/DB dependent files.
    When I go back and check the entries in SMSY, all the relevant entries are present there..
    Could anyone has encountered this before?
    Thanks
    Abhishek

    >
    Abhi wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > I am trying to download maintenance stk SRM 7.0 SPS 5.0, via solman, but I am getting the error called  "Error:System not assigned to a host" in the stage where solman looks for OS/DB dependent files.
    > When I go back and check the entries in SMSY, all the relevant entries are present there..
    > Could anyone has encountered this before?
    >
    > Thanks
    > Abhishek
    Hi Abhisek,
    are you sure that is in TX "smsy -> Systems -> <your SID> -> logical Component -> Header Data" an entry at the field "message Server" ?
    I think that is meant with host.
    regards
    Tobias

  • Srm User interface - change settings : Error in role assignment

    Hi Gurus,
    Users are facing issue when they are changing settings in the SRM user interface site .
    Go to SRM user interface SIte --> Change my settings --> change date format or decimal format .
    When they save it --> Gets an error - error in role assignment .
    What can be the issue. It's same in Dev and qa .
    Waiting for your reply.
    Points will be rewared .
    Thanks
    Munish Kumar

    Hello Munish,
    Laurent Burtaire wrote:
    If you do a where-used for message number i gave you, you will find two message calls in methods from /SAPSRM/CL_PDO_MO_USER_ACCOUNT class.
    Put a break-point to check if one of them is done. Problem cannot be due to missing authorization as there is no data in SU53 for concerned user.
    Regards.
    Laurent.

  • Error in account assignment for item

    Hello,
    We have configured EBP at Stack 03 in SRM release 550
    We are facing problem to create shopping cart,
    Already it was working fine but now at the time of adding item to shopping cart it shows below error
    messages
    1.Version 0 is not defined for fiscal year 2007
    2.Error in account assignment for item
    For your reference error screen is given in attached document.
    pls advise
    Regards,
    Santosh

    Hi Christophe,
    I am getting the same error <b>'Version 0 is not defined for fiscal year 2007'</b> when tried to create a Sales Order in IDES system and I am trying the solution to add the fiscal year 2007 in T.code OKEV but it fails.
    The steps what I have done :
    1. Go to OKEV
    2. Selecting control area 1000
    3. Selecting the version 0 line
    4. then trying to open the Settings for Each fiscal year from Dialog Structure
    The error i get is :
    <b>E: Activation of the indicator is not permitted</b>
    and the highlighted line in red is for Version 1
    The default indicator is set for version 1 is Plan, WIP/RA, Variance & Legal Valuation (Valuation view)
    I tried in many ways to 'uncheck' the boxes for this version 1 but fails.
    Pls help.
    regds,
    Umesh

  • Error message "ABAP/4 error during dynamic assign" on Contact Log creation.

    Hi,
    We are getting an error message "ABAP/4 error during dynamic assign beyond program bounds" displayed while creating contact log using transaction "BCT0".
    Please suggest what can be the cause of the error message and how we can remove this.
    Regards,
    Ankur

    Dear Andrea,
    The problem should be caused by obsolete entry in table TFAWX.
    Please use the following report for deleting this entry (test before in your TEST System) :
    report ztfawx_delete.
    tables tfawx.
    select single * from tfawx where prog = 'SAPLBAS0'
                                and bldgr = '0110'
                                and mnum  = 23
                                and bfeld = '$GENERAL'.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
      delete tfawx.
    endif.
    Buona Giornata
    Mauro

  • Issthe PO Error message *Account assignment mandatory for material

    At the time of creating the PO after putting the material and plant I get the error message " *Account assignment mandatory for material 10000213". The plant for which i want to raise is 3004 which i have created recently and only in this plant this message is showing. Please help me out
    Edited by: amitekum on Sep 17, 2010 12:34 PM

    you should have searched sdn first for this
    anyways it means that the in tcode OMS2.
    you need to mark the check box quantity and value updation for the material type of your material in combinationwith your plant
    it means this material is acting as consumable material

  • Error in account assignment with Asset

    Hi Gurus,
    I am trying to create a shopping cart with a valid Asset master but getting an error-
    Transaction type does not exist
    Error in account assignment for item 1 
    I can create a PR with this Asset number in ECC successfully without any error but the same Asset number is giving the above error in shopping cart
    Regards
    Kapil

    HI
    is the problem related only with asset number? or also with other account assignment?
    than try to understand if the following table is correctly defined
    SAP Supplier Relationship Management-SRM Server-Cross-Application Basic Settings-Account Assignment-Define Account Assignment Categories
    than
    SAP Supplier Relationship Management-SRM Server-Cross-Application Basic Settings-Account Assignment-Define G/L Account for Product Category and Account Assignment Category
    regards
    andrea

  • Error : No Cenvat amount to be posted ... urgent

    Dear Experts,
    I have captured the excise invoice during GR and part 1 entries have been updated.
    However, while posting excise invoice when I simulate cenvat in j1iex for import purchase orders I get an error 'No cenvat amount to be posted and no cenvat amount to be reversed'
    This is bit urgent....
    Cheers!
    Sachin Narvekar

    Hi,
    I also got the same problem. we maintained subtransaction type as IP Import purchase in SPRO - Logistics general - Tax on goods movement - india- account determination - maintain subtransaction type.
    then we maintain SPRO - Logistics general - Tax on goods movement - india- account determination - specify excise accounts per transaction. In this maintain maintain values for IP for main transaction of EWPO, GRPO, CAPE.
    Then maintain SPRO - Logistics general - Tax on goods movement - india- account determination - specify  G/L account per excise transaction. Take help of FICO person in this.
    By this way I solve the problem.
    Regards
    Sai Krishna
    09810497206

  • BUPA_MAIN BDOC Error AM 605 - Assignment of usage & to communication type &

    Hi  Experts,
    In our ISU to CRM replication of the Business partner we are seeing lots of BDOC error AM 605 - Assignment of usage & to communication type & not unique.
    I have figured that the error occurs when the CONSNUMBER in the ADR* table reaches 999.  Therefore, no more entries can be added for the communication type (ie another phone number) for that particular address number. 
    But the behaviour in our case is such that CONSNUMBER is reaching 999 by skiping many numbers ( i am not sure if thsi is the standard behavior or something is wrong), so its not the consistent behaviour. In some cases it suddely skips the CONSNUMBER range say which is at 400 for particular address number and goes to 990 range and reaches 999, the BDOC errors out.
    We applied note 1070798 - Repair the consnumber in communication tables.  The program Z_OSSNOTE_1070798 will be run to reorganize the consnumber, so no entry is at 999. Although this reorganies the number but this only acts as a fix after the error is already encountered.
    We still see the AM 605 error , can any one please suggest is there any way to avoid this BDOC Error from occuring. We see these error in case of organisation BPs having many addresses and their phone number in table ADR2 CONSNUMBER reaches 999.
    Immediate help is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Jessica

    Hi Jessica,
           Were you able to fix this issue of fill all required entries error?
         i have a same error with my project too.
      Yes, you know me. We worked in the same project earlier, now i am in this new project, where i get the same old error.
    Thanks
    Keerthi

  • Error in Class Assignment in Pool Asset Managment

    Hello Team,
    I am facing problem in IW21 during creation Notification type MF which is used for Pool Asset Management. if possible give me solution
    After Click on Equipment below window will open
    and in this window if i do next, no processing will happened. If i wish to save this notification system will give error Like Error in Class Assignment.
    I checked entries in PAMS_FSET table also.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Sweta

    Hi , Please check whether class PAM is defined for class type PAM in CL02 . If it is not defined please maintain some characters in it.
    Regards,

  • ABAP/4 error during dynamic assign beyond program bounds

    Hi experts,
    after an Upgrade from 4.7 to Ecc 6.0, launching transaction AC03 an error (green light) occours "ABAP/4 error during dynamic assign beyond program bounds".
    Is there anyone who find a solution?
    regards
    andrea brescia
    Edited by: andrea brescia on Nov 30, 2010 1:42 PM

    Dear Andrea,
    The problem should be caused by obsolete entry in table TFAWX.
    Please use the following report for deleting this entry (test before in your TEST System) :
    report ztfawx_delete.
    tables tfawx.
    select single * from tfawx where prog = 'SAPLBAS0'
                                and bldgr = '0110'
                                and mnum  = 23
                                and bfeld = '$GENERAL'.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
      delete tfawx.
    endif.
    Buona Giornata
    Mauro

Maybe you are looking for