Error in miro posting

Sir,
I have created on PO in which i have deducted contractor margin.now whn i m passing invoice this contractor margin which i have deducted is hitting gl code 515200 which is correct,but whn we simulate instead of hitting 515200,its hitting some other gl.
       actually there was no problem before when PO of was 10 sereies,bt now for 11 series it is a problem.

Dear
Check GL Assignments in OBYC
Regards

Similar Messages

  • Error  in Miro  post  S:/SAPPCE/DPCM2:003

    Hi guys,
    In the MIRO  posting  showing this error message  S:/SAPPCE/DPCM2:003
    Please help me
    Regards
    Channa

    Hi Suma ,
    Validation check  activated in OB28
    But issue resolved by bussiness class and section given in MIRO system allow to post the invoice
    Regards,
    Channa

  • Error while MIRO posting: Unique co code has not been assigned to co number

    Hi all
    I am getting the following error while posting MIRO-
    "A unique co code has not been assigned to co no". I think this might have to do something with CO no range. Is it so. Does any1 have any idea what this could be because of?
    Thxs in advance
    Hrishi

    Hi Vishnu
    Thxs for ur immediate reply. But cross co conttrolling is not active in my case. The error diagnosis reads as follows-
    Doc breakdown is active in ur system. In certain cases, a co code is derieved frm the Co ID no and this must lead to the assignment of a unique co code.
    A unique co code could not be assigned to Co no.
    Message No GLT0001

  • Runtime error in MIRO posting invoice for SES's created in CATS

    Hi Gurus,
    We are having an issue when posting invoices in MIRO referred to SES created in CATS.
    It always took much longer the system to process those SES created via CATS than those from the standard MM (ML81...) but the situation today is so critical that we can not pay the vendors for which SES are created via CATS. Runtime error is obtained when trying to post a SES for 900$ value.
    This problem does not happen in our integrating/testing system.
    Do you have any idea why this is happening?
    thanks to everyone in advance,
    VL

    Hi,
    have you searched for notes with the runtime error details?
    Has also a short dump occured (transaction ST22) ? Please give more detail information.
    Regards,
    Edit

  • Error in MIRO posting for credit memo in return PO

    Dear Sir,
             I have made a return PO for Vendor rejection.Then made a good return for the same with 161.Then post the excise return through JV J1IS. But when I am posting the Credit Memo for vendor system showing the Error - RG23D Part 2 has not been done yet.
              But on the other hand the excise has been posted in J1IV and part 2 can be seen in material document in excise tab.
    Then why system is showing the above said error. Please suggest for the same.
    Regards,
    Sandip Sahu
    Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Nov 17, 2011 10:42 PM

    Hi
    system showing the Error - RG23D Part 2 has not been done yet.
    R u sure you are getting this error?
    As per me in register Rg23D there is no Part2 concept it only update register RG23D with excise value and qty
    Is your plant is Depot or dealer registration
    please check your excise group and series group properly
    Regards
    kailas Ugale

  • ERROR IN MIRO POSTING ENTRIES WITH CENVAT CLEARING ACCOUNT

    Hi,
              I'm facing a problem while posting in MIRO, instead of CENVAT clearing account RG23A BED acocount is getting debited, here I'm giving you the screen shots for MIGO and MIRO accounting entries please assist me with some customizing tips.
       MIGO
       MIRO
    material : TEST MAT
    vendor   : LAKSHMI GROUP
    I've assigned 154001 G/L ac for RG23A BED and 191101 G/L for MODVAT clearing ac.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Sairam.

    Hi Shiva,
          thanks for your response as you said in std cenvat ac get debited but as you can see in that above screen shots of my accounting entries RG23ABED ac is getting debited what actually wrong. How can correct the wrong entries please suggest me some solution here I'm sharing the screen shot of Tax on Goods Movements-->Account Determination-->Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction
    please ask me for more information if you don't get my point on this problem
    Thanks in advance,
    Sairam

  • Error during MIRO posting

    Hi,
    I've the following message error dring invoice verification:
    Balance in transaction currency
    Message no. F5702
    Diagnosis
    A balance has occurred in transaction currency 'EUR' with the following details:
    Exchange rate '00', amount '1,00' and currency key 'EUR'.
    The data in the transaction currency were transferred from the calling application.
    System Response
    Your data cannot be processed in FI.
    Procedure
    The error is probably in the calling application.
    I don't understand the cause of this problem
    Could You help me ?
    Best regards

    hi,
    Are you using the currency exchange b/w your docs..
    if yes then pls check table TCURR and check whether the exchange is maintained properly or not??
    Also check wether its valid for the current period or not...
    Also make the assign via versa also like
    For eg:
    EUR to GBP
    and
    GBP to EUR
    Also any you making this 2nd or 3rd invoice or credit memo or sub seq. credit / debit doc??
    Anything else you would like to tell, pls update...
    Regards
    Priyanka.P

  • Error miro posting in third party sales order

    error in miro posting in third party sales order occured i.e, level F1 belongs to cash position(source symbol BNK)....
    pls solve the problem it is very urgent...

    Hi,
    Process
    VA01 - Create sales order (Schedule line CS and item category TAS) >> ME52N - PR is generated after save of sales order >> ME21N - Convert PR in to P.O >> Then vendor will send goods to customer and will send invoice to our company >> MIRO - Invoice receipt from vendor >> VF01 - Final invoice to customer
    When you enter vendor invoice then you come to know that vendor sent qty. same will be billed to customer(Billing relevance in item category should be F)
    Kapil

  • Miro posting error : RG23 posting not yet done.

    Dear Experts,
       IN GR DOES NOT CAPTURE EXCISE INVOICE, that means part 1 not done & in po also does not apply excise duty BUT AT THE TIME OF MIRO POSTING ASKS PART II POSTING NOT YET DONE.
    PLEASE HELP.
    THANKS,
    Sachin.
    Edited by: sachin shelke on Dec 6, 2008 6:48 AM
    Edited by: sachin shelke on Dec 6, 2008 6:52 AM

    Hi,
    Ask the concerned taxation team to do the part II entry through J1IEX and then do the MIRO.
    Regards

  • Invoice Verification (MIRO) posting, showing an error on Tax Code

    Hello
    When i am making MIRO posting it is showing that the specific tax code which i has given is not maintained in the Tax Procedure, but i have checked all the CIN Configurations, Activated the CIN and Tax Procedure is assigned to Country also and rest all is fine,i hav even created the Tax Code but still it is showing that, the TAX CODE is not maintained in Tax Procedure.
    Plz help me out,

    Hi Minhaj,
    Please goto FTXP & check if the tax rates are maintained for the given tax code. If they are maintained then check if accounts are entered by clicking on the acconts tab.
    If you are maintaining Jurisrdiction codes, please ensure that you are entering the correct jurisdiction code for the tax code you have entered.
    Please ensure that you are using the same Tax code & Jurisdiction code in MIRO as is there in MIGO.
    Hope this helps.
    Thank you.
    Regards,
    AVD

  • Tax error in MIRO

    Hi,
    I am getting tax error in MIRO while posting transaction.  "tax amount must not be greater than the tax base" msg FF747.
    Invoice amount is 168.91(MIRO)
    PO amount is 55.17
    Tax amount is 113.74
    This error is coming due to Tax amount(113.74) is greater than PO (55.17) amount.
    tax amount is greater than due to heavy import duty.  User wants to post greater tax amount than actual PO amount, could you please suggest how can it be possible to post in SAP, i am trying to post but i am getting above error.
    This error is coming due to Tax amount(113.74) is greater than PO (55.17) amount.
    Thanks,
    Sam.

    Hi Sam,
    I too have the same kind of scenario. The VAT value is more than the base amount. Please inform me the solution applied by you.
    Thanks in advance,
    Pravin.

  • MIRO - Posting with trans.type 159 not possible (No acquisition posted)

    Hi all,
    I have a case where an asset PO was created with multiple account assignment in one line item.  For example, purchase 10 pc of printer with 10 asset numbers specified in the account assignment tab.  By standard SAP, the GR is non-valuated.
    The GR of the PO was done in the previous period.  Now, when the invoice is to be posted thru MIRO.  The system generate error message to me.  The error message is "Posting with trans.type 159 not possible (No acquisition posted)" and message number is AA324.
    The reason of this error is due to no acquisition date in the asset master.  GR is non-valuated hence, the acquisition date is not populated in the asset as well.  I believe this is quite a common problem.  Kindly advise any workaround solution.
    Thanks.
    Tom

    Hi
    refer notes 1526247 and 1507808... Though it relates to Japan, but the issue is same
    Br, Ajay M

  • Commitment item not picking while MIRO posting for Service entry sheet

    Hi to all,
    We have activated Fund Management in middle of the year where there were purchase order completed to till MIGO. When we do MIRO now system unable to pick commitment item from FMDERIVE.
    We have created Commitment item as 50/3 combination ( No budget check ) and assigned to GR/IR clearing account.
    We also activated trace in FMDERIVE and checked MIRO  posting and found that derivation is working properly but while posting it is triggering error.
    Some one advise me as it affected daily activities.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Y.Kiran Babu

    Hi,
    For the purchase order completed and the related MIGO created before FM was implemented, you need to run FMCN and FMCT.
    I will explain to you in detail all the information related to the matter.
    First of all, it seems to be in your PO that does not have FM account assignment (funds center and commitment item) in account assignment TAB. In addition, the error occurs usually also because in your SES the FM account assignment is missing.
    For GR and IR documents FM always takes the major part of the FM account assignment from the PO.
    You can fill these account assignments by using the programs RFFMCHAN/RFFMCHAT.
    FMCN/FMCT must be run for the first document in the chain, which is the PO in case you don't have a PR assigned to this PO or an earmarked fund document. If you have PR's assigned to the PO's please run FMCN/FMCT for the PR first.
    When executing the FMCT transaction, ALL documents selected in one group must be tested and processed successfully TOGETHER. If any one document fails, the ENTIRE group is shown as in error.
    Therefore, first step is to ensure that the reference PO has a valid FM account assignment and is updated in FM. This should be done by FMCN/FMCT and subsequent posting with FMN4N (see reconstruction note 189761).
    The SES itself might not be changed by FMCT. Therefore you should fulfill the FM account assignments in SES manually or with a custom program.
    Please check also your table FM01X. As an alternative solution, you can enable one of these flags in table FM01X, depending on your business needs:
    FLG_PO_PROTECT if you want to always inherit the fm account assignment from the reference PO and therefore skip FMDERIVE
    FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE if you always want to force a call to fmderive in all cases
    FLG_SES_OVERWRITE in services, if you wish to overwrite the account assignment from the SES with the derived values from FMDERIVE.
    You can find more information about it in text part of notes 1146677 and 923672.
    FMDERIVE is skipped for GR/IR lines and the Commitment item is inherited from the PO regardless of whether or not the GR/IR line is FM relevant. This is SAP standard behavior.
    If you want to force the Commitment item to be derived from the GL account for the GR/IR line, you can use the FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE flag as described in note 923672.  This will allow FMDERIVE to be called for these lines.  Please be sure to fully test this to ensure that FM account assignments that you do not want to be overwritten are not incorrectly derived.
    Bear in mind that for PO´s that does not have account assignment you should run FMCN/FMCT + FMN4N. For this you would need to check the flags and which one is more related to your needs. With the appropriate flag marked in FM01X (active with X) you should be able to run the transactions without any issue.
    Based on note 189761, after doing all the previous suggestions and the issue does not appear anymore, I suggest you to run the following programs:
    1) FMN0 for this PO/GR to see if the actual values are correct in FM table FMIFIIT (FM actual line items).
    2) Run report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF). The reconstruction programs always update the totals records in Funds Management. Therefore, you do not normally need to reconstruct the totals records.  However, if you suspect there are data inconsistencies in the totals records, you can analyze and correct these using the report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF).
    If you correct the totals records, you must do this before you reconstruct the assigned values (see below).
    3) Run reconstruction for AVC
    You can also reconstruct the assigned values using the following tools:
        o  Report BPINDX03 (transaction FMBV) for former budgeting
        o  Report RFFMAVC_REINIT (transaction FMAVCREINIT) for the Budget
           Control System (BCS)
    Make sure that no other system activities (postings, budgeting) are carried out during a reconstruction (commitment/actual or assigned values).
    I believe that this resolve your inquiry.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • Error In MIRO GL  account allows only output tax

    Hello All,
    We are facing an error in MIRO that GL account xxxxx allows only out put tax. The scinario & settings are as  below.
    FB60
    There is no error when using the particular tax code sytem posts the document
    MIRO
    Same vendor & tax code used as in FB60
    The systemshows an error that GL  ***** allows only output tax.
    TAX CODE settings in FTXP
    The GL showing error is in tax code
    GL settings
    In GL master data in control tab , the tax category is defined as out put tax
    QUERY
    Why in FB60 it allows the GL & not in MIRO ( Both are vendor invoice and suppose to work in similar manner)
    please note in both the cases the entries are same
    Vendor Cr
    Expense / Stock Dr
    VAT GL **** Cr
    VAT GL-2 Dr
    VAT GL**** is not picking @ MIRO & Picks @ FB60 with out any error
    Any Idea !!!
    Thanks & Regards
    Arun R

    Hi,
    The problem is resolved .
    The error was due to the fact that the VAT was an aquisiton tax for europe.
    The details are in note  373587
    Thanks for the support
    Regards
    Arun

  • CO OBJECT ERROR IN MIRO FOR UNPLANNED DEL COST

    Dear Friends
    I m facing one error in MIRO can u guide me in that context.
    well in MIRO i m postin Unplanned deliver cost.......and it is asking me assignment to this G/L for Cost center object..
    ERROR: Account 40201070 requires an assignment to a CO object
    ..I have already assigned the Cost center for the G/l in OKB9 is there anything else has to be done
    Actually we have 4 plants and 4 Business area i.e whenever i am doing any posting for BW01 -and Business Area BA01 My cost center BW01402 will get hit similarly for other plant and Business are Cost center has been assigned in OKB9 in Details per business Area,is it the right method or anything else has to be done.
    Actually in OKB9 i have maintained that GL and in Detail per business area i have maintained cost center per business area
    we have assigned the right Cost senter only i.e for different Plant and differenct business area we have asigned different cost center.
    Then y i m getting error i m not understanding..
    Please guide me in this context.
    Also i am trying other method of posting Freight (unplanned delviery cost ) as well as labour charge through ACTIVATING -"Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts"
    So that for particular G/L I can Debt or credit that account,in which will doing MIRO G/L Tab gets activated ,i m entering G/L and entering amount for freight and Labor is this the correct procedure.
    Regards
    shailesh

    I have already assigned this G/L as primary cost element in FS00 and in OKB9 also Cost center is assigned as per Business Area as mentioned in the thread
    i.e we have 4 plants and 4 business area so we assigned 4 cost centers to 4 business area, so whenver i m postin unplanned delivery cost for a particular plant then my GL should hit with proper cost center but still it is asking for CO OBJECT
    ERROR IS:
    "Account 40201070 requires an assignment to a CO object"
    If i maintained the default Cost center in FS00 in cost element then it doesnt give error but my requirement is that for a particular plant ,and business are only cost area assigned to it should hit
    Any other solutions.
    Thankz and regards
    Shailesh

Maybe you are looking for