Error in settlement CJ88

Hello All,
Good Day!
I have encountered error while running CJ88 WBS settlement, according to it:
"Data Inconsistency: Parallel depr. area is not posted"
Message no. AAPQ104
What is the possible cause of this?
Please advice.
Thanks in advance!
Jhero

Hi,
Please check the below OSS notes:-
Note 97388 - Asset transfer: Problems with parallel areas
Note 124231 - AAPO104 w/o reason in intercompany asset transfer
Note 210557 - Mass retiremt w/ revenue in case of parallel crcies
Also check whether there is any deletion of additional dep area recently after the asset creation. If yes, you need to add it again & populate additional Dep in Asset created during trial run by T code AFBN than rerun the settlement issue will be resolved.
Regards,
Gaurav

Similar Messages

Error: Maintain settlement rule of the sender for a higher level WBS

Hi,
I dont want to maintain the settlement rule for a higher level WBS. How can i configure this in such a way that i dont get the following error:" Maintain settlement rule of the sender" while doing CJ88. Maintaing a separate Settlement profile for a higher level WBS is an option but we are looking if something else could be done The problem is that there are no actuals booked against, say, level 2 WBS but when i execute CJ88, i get the aforesaid error. How can i ensure that only the lowest level WBS ask for the settlement rule and not the levels above it. I have already removed the Investment profile from the higher level WBS but still getting the same error.
Regards,
DPil

Hi,
It is a type Capex WBS and Biling element is not checked. In fact i get a warning while doing the settlement: WBS is neither a billing element nor an account assignment element.
Diagnosis
WBS element is not indicated as either an account assignment element or as a billing element in the master record.
System Response
The WBS element cannot be assigned to an account.
Procedure
Correct your entries or add the missing indicator to the master record for the WBS element.
But this is just a warning. On pressing enter i get the error :Maintain settlement rule of the sender "

Error in Settlement & Result Analysis

Dear Experts,
Thanks for the Help provided in understanding WIP & RA.
I have almost done.
Finally one querry is there.
When I run RA (KKA2) it shows WIP. Then I save.
In settlement CJ88 it shows 2 costs:
1. Settlement of Accrued value (WBS to FI P&L, B/S Account).
2. Actual Cost of WBS to Receiver (e.g. Cost Center).
If I do not settle actual cost of WBS, WIP is shown correctly.
When I settle actual cost of WBS to receiver (e.g. Cost Center), WIP is reduced by amount equal to settlement amount. This gives wrong picture.
Question:
Settlement of Acutal cost on WBS is to be done at end of project (TECO) OR It can be settled in between (In my case it gives problem if settled in between).
Please guide.
SSanjay

Hi Raman
If you are using Costing Based COPA - What you are doing is not correct... You should not create Variance acct as cost element
However, if you still wanna do it, then check whether it is the same GL account or a different account which you assigned in OKB9... Just check if this GL in the error msg is there in PA Trf Str FI
If the error msg pertains to PA Trf Str other than FI - Then check whether the Cost ele posted in the Prod order are assigned in that PA Trf Str
br, Ajay M

Bud. exceed error on settlement, statistical project

Hi Experts
In my system I have created Statistical Project WBS (with CC posted). I have assigned NW Activities to it and doing all my procurements through Activities.
Everything goes fine (Planning- Budgeting-PR-PO-GR etc.) till settlement.
When I do settlement (CJ88) the system gives error of Budget Exceed (BP604) even when sufficient budget is available on WBS elements.
Can anybody suggest how it can be removed. (Currently I do CJBW then settle and then again do CJBN. But this does not look a good solution to me).
JOHRIP

W1: level one WBS: 100 assigned
W2, W2: 2 WBS elemnts at level two: 50 distributed to each from W1
Now i have made a purchase for 50 and posted to w2 (level 2), and at the month end i need to settle 50 at leavl two.
Once i do settelment , the error is budget exceeded.
Correct me if i am wrong: i need to settle 50 to W1 (level1) and then settle W1 (level 1) to AUC.
Hope so now my question is clear.
Edited by: Surya Pampana on Oct 21, 2010 3:30 PM

Valueation type error when settleing production order

Hi ,
We are geting error following error when settleing the production order " For material xxxxx valuation type 01 does not exist for plant xxxx " wat could be the problem . Is it due to any split valueation activation problem .

Hi
Check in MM60, the valuation type maintained for material/ plant combination, if it doesnet exists then create the material type with 01 valuation type in plant.
Also check in OMWC, valuation category and valuation types are correctly assigned to plant.
Thanks
Edited by: Praveen Raghavendra on Apr 16, 2009 8:53 AM

Selecting document type for settlement CJ88

During project or order settlement (CJ88,KO88) the document type "YP" specified in the Settlement Profile is used for the FI portion of the settlement, WBS to AUC, but the controlling entries use the default FI/CO document type. We would like all transactions in the settlement process, both FI and CO, to use the document type YP.
The controlling enties, settlement from WBS to WBS, post to FI through Real Time Integration CO-FI. If I change the document type in FAGLCOFIIMG from SA to YP then the CO settlement documents begin posting as YP as desired.
Is there a way to have Real Time CO-FI Integration select a variant by transaction type so it chooses YP for only settlement transactions? Or is there a better way to have all settlement transactions use the same document type?
Thanks,
Jeff

Go to transaction KOT2_OPA and check against the order type that you use, which settlement profile is assigned.Then go to transaction OKO7 to change the document type for that settlement profile. Document types can be created in transaction OBA7.

Error while settling costs to AUC (T.CODE CJ88)

The following error is encountered while settling costs to AUC using
t.code CJ88 with WBS element,
with parameters
with orders
Selection processing type 3 (partial settlement),
period 4,
FY 2008,
selection - with hierarchy, with orders.
Error message is:-
Typ Message text
LTxt
Sender: WBS ASCP.DSCA.CP.NS.DS.003 PLANNO MILLING 4MX2M
Acquisition value negative in area 01.

Hi,
Use T.Code: as02 and click on Depreciation areas, then double click on Depreciation area(example :01 - book dep), there u can select the field allow negative postings allowed. Once this process is completed, remove that indicator.
If u couldn't found that field, then goto screen layout for depreciation area and change status from suprress to optional.
Hope it can resolve ur problem
regards
Prasad

Error while Settlement to AUC from Project CJ88

Hi,
ECC 6.00/PSM-BCS
While settling the Project to AUC I am getting the below error. Please advice.
*Asset DAML 000009000004 0000: no subnumber with FM assignment CAPEX / /*
Message no. AW851
Diagnosis
During settlement of sender WBS DAMEPL 1.1.1.1 there was an attempt to settle a posting that has account assignment CAPEX / / (fund/functional area/grant) to an asset subnumber. However, the receiving asset DAML 000009000004 0000 does not have an asset subnumber with this assignment.
System Response
The posting on this sender cannot be settled to an asset subnumber.
Procedure
Either create an asset subnumber with account assignment CAPEX / / for asset DAML 000009000004 0000, or settle to a different receiver.
If this message appears as a warning only, then the posting from this sender is settled to the asset main number.
Fund Capex : CAPEX
Company Code : DAML
WBS Element : DAMEPL 1.1.1.1
Best Regards
Shekhar
Edited by: Chandrashekher Yellapragada on Jun 5, 2010 7:00 PM

I am facing the same error and find this OSS Note 440396 - Missing entries for configurable messages in IS-PS-FM where you can deactivate the error message.
Hope this will solve your issue too.
Regards,
OSS Note 440396
Symptom
System issues messages AW851,AW852,AW856 or AW857 as Error even though
functionality exists to make these configurable.
Other terms
LAIMBFM1, OBA5, AW, AW851, AW852, AW856, AW857
Reason and Prerequisites
Missing entries in tables.
Solution
Create Application Area for Customizable messages for 'AW' using transcation SM30 with view V_T100SA.
Next using transaction SM34, enter view cluster VC_T100S, click maintain and select Application Area AW and double click Messages. Add the following entries:
AppArea     No. Allowed Values     Std     Switch off
AW     851    EWI     E          X
AW     852    EWI     E          X
AW     856    EWI     E          X
AW     857    EWI     E          X
Afterwards with Transaction OBA5 insert the entries for the messages you want to customize, and set them to the error level the behaviour should be for your particular case.

Budget Exceed error while settlement in PS T-Code CJ88

Hi Guru's,
I have created structure upto 6 level and i have done planning and budgeting at 6th level only, and actual cost is also posted at 6th level.
When i am setteling that amount at 5th level WBS using T-Code CJ88 then it is giving Budget exceed error of that particular amount as budget is also available at higher level WBS as accumalation of budget at 6th level is going to higher level WBS as i am following buttom-up approach.
Please suggest.
Regards,
Ambuj

Hi Rajesh,
When you distribute budget to lower level WBS, the budget is only available at the lower level (availability is checked as: Budget - Distributed Budget - Assigned) regardless of whether it is shown at the superior level or not.
AVAC status is activated automatically on WBS where budget is distirbuted and released (provide you have maintained Activation Type 1 in Budget Profile OPS9). Please check if AVAC status is active on your 5th level WBS. If it is active then the system will throw the error as SAP standard behavior. You can remove this status from 5th level WBS via CJBW.
You may need to look at your budget configuration accordingly.
Regards,
Ammar

Availability Control error during settlement

Hi,
When I run CJ88 settlement system gives error message
Item 001 WBS element KGP-09-010.001 budget exceeded
Message no. BP603
Diagnosis
Budget was exceeded by 78,000.00 INR in document item 001 WBS element KGP-09-010.001
Configuration are- in OPS9 activation type 1 and with Release
Tolerance Limit ++ for all transaction groups with usage 105%
How is the budget exceeding though I have sufficient budget in WBS.
Why was no availability error thrown when I saved the PO.
Why is this giving during the time of settlement?
The budget is exceeded by the amount assigned in the wbs i.e PO value.
Plz help
Regards,
Suman ...

hi,
did you settle the lower wbs to higher wbs?
if so, it is possible that when you settled, the cost were posted to higher WBS element but the budget was distributed...
thus, there will already be an error budget exceeded since the cost is in higher level WBS but budget is distributed to lower level..
check in CJI3 if indeed costs were already transferred.. it is possible that higher level wbs was not settled to appropriate reciever thats why the costs remained...
that perhaps explains why if you release in higher wbs only, there is no error...
hope this helps..

KO88 - Error when settling for Cost Center AND Auc for the same Internal Or

Hi Experts,
We need to configure Investment Internal Orders that could settle to both Cost Center and Auc, but each assignments with different Source Cost Elements
We did the following:
1. Created Auc Class
2. Created Investment Profile "IMOBIL" and assigned to Auc Class, flagging Auc
3. Created Allocation Structure "CV" with two assignments:
01, Source = Cost elements 7000000000 to 7999999999, receiver AUC "by cost element"
02 Source = Cost elements 4000000000 to 4999999999, receiver CTR "by cost element"
4. Created Model Order, filling the Investment Profile IMOBIL created in step 2.
5 Created Settlement Profile ZCV0001, assigning Allocation Strucutre CV, allowing CTR and AUC for receivers, default receiver is "FXA", doc type "AA".
6 Created ORder Type CV01, assigning Settlement Profile ZCV0001.
When I post only for Asset Expenses (Source Cost element 7, Assigment 01), the settlement through KO88 correctly settles to AUC, and also creates the settlement rule for cost center (i'm using the strategy to create from Responsible Cost Center).
But when I post for Asset Expenses (cost elements 7, receiver AUC) AND General Expenses (Source Cost element 4, receiver CTR), KO88 generates an error KD506, saying that for Assigment 02 - AUC I didnt define a settlement cost element.
1. Assignment 02 is not AUC, is CTR;
2. I flagged "by cost element", so I don't need a settlement cost element. And also, I was able to post to AUC when the source posting was only for cost element 7.
Did you face any problem like this?
I cannot find out what is the missing configuration, or if it is a program error...
Kind Regards
Mayumi Blak

Hi Ajay
I already created Source Structure and assigned to my Setllement profile (so I assigned Allocation Structure AND Source Structure).
I don't understand when you say that I need to assign the Source Sutrcture in each rule....because the Source structure is in the Settlement Parameters valid for both rules...
When I post to Asset Expenses only for the internal Order, the 2 rules (CTR and AUC) are created when I run KO88 (but only AUC rule is settled). This is OK.
The problem is when I post for both General Expenses AND Asset Expenses, the system is not recognizing that I have 2 source structures, neither is findind that for CTR AND AUC the Settlement cost elements are the original cost elements.
I'm thinking about changing message KD506 to warning, do you know if this can help?
Kind Regards
Mayumi Blak

Error while settlement of WBS - Funds Management

Hi,
We have maintain derivation rule as - WBS to Fund Center. This Fund center is DUMMY because we need not want to control WBS through Funds Management.
There is always one Cost center in each WBS. while settling this WBS we are getting error as -
Asset ABC 000127000000 0000: no subnumber with FM assignment DUMMY / /
Message no. AW851
ABC - Company code
000127000000 - asset number
DUMMY - Fund center
suggest.

alex ice wrote:
Hi, 1 change FC in AS02 to dummy if it applicable.
> 2 Check note 618269 it applicable.
> 3 remove FC from asset master data
Hi Alex, how are u!?
I've got the same issue than Harsh Vaidya in my system ...
Ive already read this notes: [618269|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/618269] (no apply to me, because Joint Venture Accounting isn't active), [844262|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/844262], [1473357|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1473357], [446029|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/446029] and [440396|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/440396]
All very interesting notes :P
But... I couldn't find the solution
I try to TRACE from FMDERIVE too, but when I go to KO88, FMDERIVE's trace doesn't track anything.
Any help to throw some more light on this thread, would be very useful.
Thanks a lot!
Regards from Argentine.

Error while settlement of Internal order

Dear All
I am getting the following error while executing KO88 "Choose transaction type and base value appropriate for asset values".
The settlement and posting period are 12 and the processing type is "Partial Capitalization".
Pls advice
Rgds
Nitika

hi.....
check you settlemnt rule for internal order. forsure you will find mismatch between settlemnt rule and actual settlemnt. check in settlement rule the % to be settled.
Regards
Manish Jain
Pls assign points if your problem get solved.

Error while settlement of IO to Asset

Dear Experts,
We are settling IO to multiple assets using KO88 and get the below error , any tips would assist
System error: Master area for proof of origin not found
Message no. AW 666
regards
Diwakar

Hi,
You should check if depreciation area 01 is activated. If not, activate it and it should allow settlement.
Or could it be that you possibly have no depreciation area 01 in the AuC?
In such a case when there is no depreciation area 01 present in AUC, it is NOT possible to post from an internal order to an asset under construction.
If you do not want values in depreciation area 01, you can customize a capitalization key in the AuC. Please refer to the documentation on this functionality.
This inforamtion should help you to resolve AW 666 when trying to settle an Internal Order.
Kind regards,
Brigitte Kuehni

Error while settling Internal Order to CWIP asset using T-cdoe KO88

Hi experts,
While settling the amount from Internal Order to particular CWIP asset, i am getting the following error
"Define a number range for settlement documents"
Kindly provide me the solutions how to go about it.
Thanks in advance
Bashyam

Hi,
Go to T.Code KANK
Click on "Maintain Groups" (F6)
Assign a suitable number range to object KOAO
Regards,
Kenneth

Error in settlement CJ88

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for