Error in tax code

Hello,
The scenario is we are using TAXINJ  and one of our tax code is not calculating the VAT value in PO , we have maintained the rate in tax code master in ftxp and condition record is also maintained but the when i put the tax code in PO the value of VAT is not coming .
Suggest

Hi,
In which SAP version you are getting this error? From ECC 5 and 6 you have to maintaing Tax Rates in T Code: FV11 (FI Side) and VK11 (MM Side). This may resolve your problem.
Thanks
Chandra

Similar Messages

  • Error in Tax code while creating a PO in T.code ME21n

    Hi,
    I am trying to create purchase Order, I am getting an error when while entering this
    Tax Code : v1
    Jurisdict. Code: RS14902
    The error is "Tax code v1 in procedure TAXBRJ is Invalid"
    How to rectify this error. Or
    What can be other way of entering the tax code and jurisdict code

    Hi,
    Go to the Table T007A, where you find the tax codes.
    Input & out put taxes are the tax types.
    In FTXP T.code give the tax code and  click on the
    Input tax codes are used for purchase cycle and out put taxes are for sales cycle. I Hope you have given the sales related tax code. Thats why system is giving the error message.
       In T007 Table give the proper input and get the details.
    Regards,

  • Error FF753 Tax code 01 not appear in any G/L account item with FM Active

    Hi
    We have fund management configured for one of the company code, while creating billing document through VF01/VF02 we are  getting the Error FF753 Tax code 01 not appear in any G/L account item.
    This error however does not appear when posting directly from FI with the same tax code.
    I have tried to change the message control in which case i am getting a dump pointing to PSM-FM.
    Please advise.
    Regards
    Sandeep

    Hi:
              If you could please refer to the contents of  OSS Note 112609 - How are tax codes transferred to conditions ?
    "Symptom
    If a billing document is transferred to accounting the system displays error messages. Transferring tax codes from tax conditions into the pricing conditions and discounts does not function as expected.
    Other terms
    FF805, FF747, FF753, MWSKZ, MWSK1, tax code
    Reason and Prerequisites
    The tax condition in the SD pricing procedure contains incorrect reference steps, there are several tax conditions in the pricing procedure of which the tax codes overwrite each other or a program error exists.
    Solution
    In the accounting document for a billing document, the different G/L account line items are provided with a tax code. The tax code of the G/L accounts is transferred from the tax condition(s) of the billing document. How are the tax codes of the tax conditions transferred into the other conditions of a billing document ?
    Basically:
    The conditions of a billing document are read from top to bottom. As soon as an active tax (inactive = ' ') is read, the system transfers the tax code of this tax into the non-tax conditions as follows:
        1. The reference steps (From-step, To-step) are read (the reference steps are defined in the pricing procedure).
        2. The tax code is transferred into all conditions, for which
        the step number of the condition lies in the pricing procedure between "From-step" and "To-step",
        the condition is not inactive (exactly: the inactive flag is not equal to A (Condition exclusion), M (Inactive due to manual entry), or X (Incorrect)),
        the condition is not statistical (if it is no invoice list condition),
        the condition is no tax condition.
    After the transfer of the tax code the system searches for the next active tax. If further taxes are found, their tax code is again transferred according to the above procedure. If the reference steps of different taxes overlap, tax codes that have already been transferred are overwritten. To all non-tax conditions which in the pricing procedure stand after the last tax condition the tax code of the last active tax condition is transferred if they are not statistical.
    Special features:
        1. If the "From-step" of a tax condition refers to a subtotal of the pricing procedure, the tax code of the tax is not only transferred into the conditions with step number between From-step and To-step but into all non-tax conditions for which
        the step number of the condition in the pricing procedure is lower than the "To-step" of the tax condition.
        the condition is not statistical (if it is no invoice list condition).
        the condition is not a tax condition.
        2. If the "To-step" of the tax condition is smaller than the "From-step", then the system sets "To-step = From-step".
    Notes:
        1. As of Release 4.0 the tax code is no longer transferred in pricing but only when the billing document is released to accounting.
        2. If you use several taxes and tax codes and Customizing is incorrect for the release of billing documents to accounting, among others the system may display error message FF747.
        3. If there are several taxes in the pricing procedure refer to Notes 72173 and 82091 for Releases 3.0D - 3.1G. For Release 3.1H, only note 82091 is relevant.
        4. For conditions which are transferred into accounting (thus not statistical, not inactive conditions) and do not contain a tax code, the system searches for a default tax code which in Accounting Customizing can be set depending on the company code (tax code for non-taxable transactions). This applies to releases up to and including Release 4.5B. For Release 4.6, refer to Note 385127."
    Regards

  • While Printing Stock Transfer PO giving error message " Tax code in procedu

    Dear SAP MM Cons,
    I want see the print preview of stock transfer purchase order but i getting following error.
    Tax code in procedure TAXINN is invalid
    Where we need not require to give any tax code in the stock transfer PO. Can any body help me to see the printpreview of STO.
    Reagrds
    Abhishek Tiwari

    Kedarji
    Thank you.Urgent please.
    Regards
    venkat
    Edited by: garapati on Feb 15, 2008 12:06 PM

  • Regarding Error in Tax Codes after Creation of Excise Invoice.

    Dear All,
    We are using TAXINN Procedure,I have maintained condition records and given the correct tax codes in them for Basic Excise Duty,Secondary Cess and Higher Secondary Cess on the table 357,however after checking the accounting document which is created post creation of excise invoice the wrong tax codes are getting picked up however when i create my commercial invoice and check the tax codes the correct tax codes are coming,please advice what needs to be done to rectify this error.
    Best Regards
    Atul Keshav

    This query is now resolved

  • Error in Tax Code after Creation of Excise Invoice

    Dear All,
    We are using TAXINN Procedure,I have maintained condition records and given the correct tax codes in them for Basic Excise Duty,Secondary Cess and Higher Secondary Cess on the table 357,however after checking the accounting document which is created post creation of excise invoice the wrong tax codes are getting picked up however when i create my commercial invoice and check the tax codes the correct tax codes are coming,please advice what needs to be done to rectify this error.
    Best Regards
    Atul Keshav

    Hi
      If you are using TAXINN procedure, check apart from VK11 check you have maintained TAX CODE for excise condition types. Example FTXP or VK19 (using application as TX). Also check whether you are using UTXJ condition type. If you are using UTXJ condition type then please remove it.
       For TAXINN you need not have UTXJ condition type.
    Regards
    MBS

  • Error 'No tax code found for difference' in Posting Vendor Invoice IDOC

    Hi All,
    I am getting error message 'No tax code found for difference' while posting Vendor Invoice IDOC into SAP. IDOC type is INVOIC02. There is no difference in PO price, Invoice price and even Standard price. then why this  error message? Other Vendor EDI settings are done ( OBCA, OBCD, OBCE etc). Is there any thing specific to be done in the config for this error?
    IDOC has PO  as reference document.
    I looked into several threads in SDN forum but could not find proper solution
    Can any ine help me with this issue?
    Thanks in advance
    Hari

    Hi
    You might be  missing the tax code for uploding through IDOC
    so you can use the t.code we02 and give the doc and find the error
    go to the WE19 to edit the tax  code
    and USE the t.code  BD87  to select the doc and process it
    thanks
    Madhu

  • Error message "Tax code V1 does not appear in any G/L account item"

    Hi,
    I am getting the error message FF753- Tax code V1 does not appear in any G/L account item when I post a subsequent credit via miro.
    It does not give the error with invoice or credit memo for the sames GL accounts.
    History:
    PO created
    Goods receipt
    Invoice posted and blocked as value greater than PO
    Subsequent credit put on to correct the values in price query - error appears
    I know if I go to FS02 and make the GL code * tax relevant it will remove the error but we dont want tax to go to this account as its a main inventory GL code. 
    Can anyone advise why it would appear on the subsequent credit but not on invoices or credits.
    Also is there something I can set up to remove this issue apart from making the GL code tax relevant - it must not need it if the other postings work ok.
    Thanks

    Doesnt matter that it works for credits and invoices with blank tax you still need to put * in GL code for subsequent credit etc postings

  • Error in tax code for UK IT0065

    Hi every body, I have an error with IT0065. When I try to create a new IT0065 with the new emergency value has of 6th April 2011: 747L, I have the following error message: "enter valid tax code"
    I have correctly implemented notes 1564954 (change the value in T511K)
    Does I need to do something else ?
    Thanks a lot,
    KR
    Greg

    Yes this exactly what I have into my T511K table.
    Constant       Text                                    BEGDA         ENDDA         Value
    TXCOD     Emergency tax code     2008.09.07     2009.04.05     603.00
    TXCOD     Emergency tax code     2009.04.06     2011.04.05     647.00
    TXCOD     Emergency tax code     2011.04.06     9999.12.31     747.00
    Edited by: GREGORY DAHAN on May 3, 2011 2:17 PM
    Edited by: GREGORY DAHAN on May 3, 2011 2:18 PM

  • Error while tax code creation

    Dear All,
                    At the time of Tax code creation through FTXP . i am getting the error message as Define the tax code on level 300.we are in SAP 4.7 with procedure TAXINJ. how to resolve this issue...?..
    Regards
    Anand.

    Hi,
    Please go to SM30 and enter the Table Name J_1IINDCUS. Now click on Maintain. Enter your company Code 1005 and Maintain the all settings which are required.
    I hope it should work
    Regards,
    Jigar

  • Tcode FB05-Error Msg Tax Code in GL Account Item

    Dear Gurus,
    User is trying to post incoming payment from customer and enters tax code in FB05 in GL line item no place to enter tax code SAP gives the following error message when Doc is simulated:
    Tax code O1 does not appear in any G/L account item
    Message no. FF753
    Diagnosis
    The document entered contains a customer or vendor item with tax code O1. This does not occur in any of the G/L account or asset items.
    Consequences:
    If you have not entered the cash discount base manually, the system will set it to zero in this item.
    If this item was paid with cash discount deduction and the cash discount amount contains a tax portion, the tax code entered is used for the backdated tax calculation. An automatic breakdown does not take place on the basis of the offsetting items.
    Procedure
    Check whether the tax code was set correctly. If necessary, correct it or enter "**".
    There are, however, also situations in which it makes sense to enter a tax code manually which differs from the offsetting items, for example, during data acquisition.
    Effects on Customizing
    You can define when this system message is to be issued in accordance with your requirements.
    You do this in Customizing as follows: Cross-Application Components -> Bank Directory -> Change Message Control.
    The application area and message number can be taken from the technical documentation.
    Please Suggest should I change the Message Control or any other way.
    Regards
    Suresh

    Hi
    FB05 is used to create reverse postings for accrual and deferral documents.
    Data has to be present already in the system which we are trying to reverse.
    Any changes to existing data would lead to inconsistencies and hence the problem.
    Caio
    Raghu

  • Error in tax code creation

    hi everyone,
    i have defined new tax codes by using OB40 and FTXP. when i create a standart PO, these codes appear at "invoice" section of ME21N. but when i enter incoming invoice from MIRO these codes don't appear. what can cause this problem. if you can help me i would be grateful.
    thanks a lot.
    Melih

    the tax code for the PO line items should eb defaulted in MIRO. Check the layout you are using in MIRO.
    If you choose the layout 'All information', tax code is the 9th column from the left.
    Praveen.

  • ME21N,Future Date PO and Tx.Code Error FF718 Tax Code ..does not exist...

    Hi
    We'r creating a PO with me21n and geting the message FF718 - Tax code does not exists for the jurisdiction code"
    The problem is that the PO is a future dated, i.e. document date, delivery date and also a tax code eff. date s in the future (e.g. the current system date is Mar 24, the PO and the Tax Code dates are May 01, 2010.
    We assume the system should allow entering POs which are using the Tax Code effective in the future under condition that the document date is after the effective date of the Tax Code.
    abap debugging revealed a possible problem in the MM06EF0E_EKPO_TXJCD, MM06EF0E_EKPO-MWSKZ in the function call (, CALL Function "CALCULATE_TAX_FROM_GROSSAMOUNT" in our case).
    Neither the delivery not PO dates are not passed to this function (the parameter I_PRSDT). If the date is not passed the function is using sy-datlo (system date) as the date to check the Tax and Tax Jurisdition codes.
    The questions:
    1) Is my assumption that using future dated tax code is not programmed in the ME21N ?
    2) if I am right whether this problem was addressed by sap, i.e. is there a note to fix this and to allow using future dated tax codes.
    tnx,
    Victor

    Hi sap mates,
    any suggestions ..i do get the same problem..
    need ur help badly ...

  • Invoice Verification (MIRO) posting, showing an error on Tax Code

    Hello
    When i am making MIRO posting it is showing that the specific tax code which i has given is not maintained in the Tax Procedure, but i have checked all the CIN Configurations, Activated the CIN and Tax Procedure is assigned to Country also and rest all is fine,i hav even created the Tax Code but still it is showing that, the TAX CODE is not maintained in Tax Procedure.
    Plz help me out,

    Hi Minhaj,
    Please goto FTXP & check if the tax rates are maintained for the given tax code. If they are maintained then check if accounts are entered by clicking on the acconts tab.
    If you are maintaining Jurisrdiction codes, please ensure that you are entering the correct jurisdiction code for the tax code you have entered.
    Please ensure that you are using the same Tax code & Jurisdiction code in MIRO as is there in MIGO.
    Hope this helps.
    Thank you.
    Regards,
    AVD

  • Error: Purchase tax code

    Hi,
    I have created following tax Combination
    ED@10 %
    Ecess@2%
    Hcess@1%
    VAT@4%
    This combinations when applied in sales documents works fine but...
    if i apply same in purchase document the tax amount is displayed as zero in Taxamount column.
    can anyone guide what could be the reason.
    swapnil

    hi swapnil,
    Tax Liable is defaulted to 'N' based on Tax definition(VATLiable) from Item master,
    This Tax Definition field will be applicable to specific localization,
    Run query
    SELECT T0.ItemCode,T0.VATLiable FROM OITM T0
    Based on value in tax definition in item master,tax liable will get populated at row level of marketing
    documents,If it is 'Y',then TaxLiable will be 'Y',if it is 'N',then TaxLiable will be 'N'.
    I think in 2007B item master Tax Definition field is set Default to 'N',
    By table definition itself it is set to 'Y',You can't change it.
    You can change manually tax liable in AP invoice from No --> Yes.
    Above briefing is based after testing TaxLiable field in demo database.
    Check TaxLiable default value in tables OITM,PCH1,
    SAP B1 2007B Company Database Tables Reference chm file,
    It will be in documentation of SDK.
    Hope it clarifies the issue.
    Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Jun 13, 2009 12:27 PM

Maybe you are looking for

  • New Customer Field in CCM2.0

    Hi I need a new customer field in catalog which I want in the shopping cart as well. I have used the allready created customer fields 1-5. Do anyone know how to create a new OCI customer fields? Thanks in advance Best regards Jesper

  • SolMan integration with Visio

    Hi Experts , I am looking for an option to download my business process structures and graphs to Mircosoft Visio ? Is it possible to download business processes to Visio ? Harsh

  • Apple Remote Desktop update 3.5.2

    since Apple Remote Desktop update 3.5.2 when I access to a computer using two screens I get black screen or partial displays

  • Datamax Label printing and SAPSprint

    Hi colleagues, we're looking at implementing Datamax label printers and my understanding of OSS Note 490295 - Printing labels with Datamax DPL printers, is we need to use Bartender to generate the labels, import into sapscripts, etc... before sending

  • Proper use of undefined

    Proper use of undefined Leslie:  I bet you have an answer for this one... I am on version 6.0.7.1 (1961) My goal is to check and see if a dictionary is not present because its permission was accidently set to NONE. When I use this ISF nothing happens