Error in VF44 require assignment of CO object

Hello SAP Gurus,
We are executing VF44 for Sales order (sales order line has account assigment as WBS element) an error messsage - Ledger Account require assignment of CO object.
What to do in this case to resolve this.
Regards

You use a income account and it is cost element also and you have to assign a co object but cost centers are statistical posting object for income cost elements so you have to use a PA object. If PA is not active do not create cost element for that income account. Delete cost elemenent. If you can not delete or if you want it to be a cost element then create a dummy internal order for revenue carrying account assignement object...

Similar Messages

  • MIGO Error - Account 6500029 requires assignment with CO object

    Hi Experts,
    I am facing problem with new material code opened recently.  Valuation class assigned is ZSTD. 
    At the time of GRN, It is  giving an error msg :
    Message no. KI235.  Account 6500029 requires assignment with CO object. 
    Kindly note I am not making an account assignment P.O.  It is a normal P.O.
    Previously also with same valuation class, we have received no. of materials with out any error.
    It should post the material to my inventory account 1220000 as it did with materials of the same valuation class earlier.  I don't know from where it is picking GL 6500029.
    Kindly help.
    Regards,
    Rajneesh Gulati

    Hi ,
    In OBYC kindly check the Key BSX for the GL account assingment to the valuation class .
    As inventory accounts are Balance sheet accounts and do no require an assingnment to a cost element .
    If your account is getting changed then check the same in OBYC - BRX .
    Regards ,
    Dewang T

  • Gl account require assignment to Co object

    Hi
    while  doing PGI .it is giving error of  "account require assignment to CO object"
    please clear where to assign Co object & how.
    do i need to assign the Gl in okb9 seeting

    hi,
    First identify GL account which you have assigned in OBYC . then go to FS00 and enter your account no. and press on Edit Cost Element in that there is 3rd tab page Default account assignment there give cost center and save it.
    Now try once again.
    thx.
    Ganu

  • GL account requires assignment to CO object

    Dear All,
    While preparing excise Invoice the accounting document is not getting released. On going to T-code VFX3 and tyring to releasing the document message comes as "Account 00000 requires assignment to CO object".
    Kindly guide on this issue .
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi
    I think it comes form the Account assignment tab in Item / header level of sales order where we mantain the Business Area.
    just check the settings (Path -
    ENTERPRISES STRUCTURE>ASSIGNMENT>SALES AND DISTRIBUTION>BUSINESS AREA ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT

  • Error KI235 - Account requires an assignment to a CO object

    Hi gurus,
    I just wanted to ask re: thjs issue of ours wherein we can't release a billing document to accounting (VFX3) and system issues error message - KI235 (account assignment missing). In OKB9, the profit center assignments have already been set. The problem seems to originate from 1 item in the document wherein the profit center is not populated, thus no CO object can be obtained. I checked the material for that line item to verify why the profit center is not being populated automatically. I found out that the material is non-valuated goods.
    The question now is, what do I need to do to push through with the transaction? I checked in VF02, and unfortunately, we cannot manually input the Profit Center from there. Any suggestion or help is very much appreciated.
    Thanks

    Hi
    To rectify the billing document, please proceed as follows:
    Option 1:
    1. Cancel the billing document
    2. Modify the sales order to include profit center
    3. Then, create the billing document which will have profit center assignment.
    Option 2:
    1. Maintian the relevant cost center for that cost element (temporarily) in KA02
    2. Then release the billing document using VFX3.
    3. Remove the temporary assignment of cost center to CE.
    Regards

  • MR11 clearing - GL accounts requires an assignment to co object

    Hi Experts,
    While executing MR11 clearing, system is throwing error account xxxxxxxx requiring an assignment to CO object. We have done GR as well IR for which cost object is correctly picked as in purchase order. But while doing MR11 it is throwing error. What configuration needs to be checked to over come this error.
    Thanks in advance
    Narayanan

    Hi,
    Go to FS00 choose  your That g/l account click on change mode and click on Edit cost element (F8) and click on Default Acct Assgnmt Tab give me a cost center and save
    Thanks,
    Raviteja

  • Sale of Material - Assignment to Cost Object Error

    Dear Forum,
    The users while trying to do the PGI, encountered the error - "Account xxxxx requires an assigment to Cost Objet". However, when we check the Material Master, for doing the OKB9 maintenance, we get the message 'Costing View' not maintained for thie material. How could be the reason and how can we address this issue.
    Another issue is that the posting is going to the wrong GL Account, which is mentioned in the aforesaid error message. How can we check the MM Account Determination to verify the correctness of the GL Account for posting of the Cost of Sales at the time of PGI.
    Thanks for the help.
    Regards

    Hi,
    Use transaction code: KA02: enter G/L account xxxxx(Cost element) and in default acct assinmt TAB,assign the Cost Center and save.
    Now try ur transaction.
    OR
    Check the field status of the account in FS00. If this account requires CO object as mandatory then check whether a cost element is created or not , this error normally occurs when CO object is mandatory but relevant cost element is not created.
    Example: CO object may be cost center, cost element, WBS element
    OR
    Use t.code OKB9 and assign G/L account to cost object with ur company code and save.
    For more check the link
    http://www.sap-img.com/financial/requires-an-assignment-to-a-co-object.htm
    For 2nd issue
    Check VAY in OBYC under GBB
    For more check the link:
    http://www.sap-img.com/financial/difference-between-primary-and-secondary-cost-element.htm
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Account 76701000 requires an assignment of CO object-Reversal of Invoice

    Statndard PO has been created by business . They did the IR without GR as they usually does. Now business is not going to procure material from the vendor they are not going to receive the material, But IR has been done, Now they want to reverse the IR document. But while reversing the IR document they are getting error- Account 76701000 requires an assignment of CO object.
    I have option to enter the cost center or order in the master data level. But is there any possibility to do the changes at PO level.
    But its surprise when we post the IR , no posting done in cost accounting , But while reversing why its asking for cost element, When i did the analysis Reversal is hitting PRD account key.
    I can do enter the cost center in the CO object and reverse the IR, But when i check in the FI costing document its showing zero values.I did it quality server, But Business is denied this solution and wants to do changes at PO level.
    Let me is there anyway to change the PO.
    Please help me to resolve this ASAP. IR has to be reverse for this PO.
    Edited by: varikais on Sep 8, 2011 6:53 AM

    hi
    In PRODUCTION server , there is no account in EIN/EKG In OBYC.
    also there no account maintenance for 602010 as a cost element in OKB9. But Error for CO object (while procurement of raw material) is not coming. WHY THIS?
    And CO object error comes only in DEV server.while procurement of raw material.Though we use MTO in DEV.
    I get confuse pl explain.(URGENTLY)
    Edited by: harshad deshmukh on Jun 18, 2008 12:32 PM

  • Error occured in number assignment for object RESB

    Hello all,
    While creating the production order, I am getting error as "Error occured in number assignment for object RESB" ,
    How to solve this error?
    Regards,
    Sagar

    In SNRO for Object RESB, check the definition i.e. the intervals, number ranges assigned, the buffer setup. If you're not familiar with this, seek help from your basis personnel.

  • J1I5 - 'Error occured in number assignment for object J_1IRG1'

    Dear Friends,
    Please help me.I got the following error while clicking on Register entry button.
    "Error occured in number assignment for object J_1IRG1".
    How can I correct it.
    Regards,
    Rubin

    maintain numer ranges for  this object.
    or check in SNUM.
    Regards
    Peram

  • Error: Assignment of Context Object is Incomplete

    I am experiencing a rather odd problem in PI 7.1 SPS 7 - I am unable to add a context object to my Service Interface.
    First I create an xsd:string context object called "JobNumber".
    In the same SWCV, I open my service interface.  (abstract, stateless XI 3.0 Compat, asynch) and click the "Context Object" button.  In the Context Object Assignment screen, I navigate to the appropriate node in my schema and assign the context object.  When I save & activate the changes to my service interface I get this error:
    Check Result for Object SynchIncident
    Check of operations for service interface
    Check of operation SynchIncident
    Assignment of Context Object OMS_JobNumber | http://oge.com/ccs/order is incomplete
    Furthermore, if I click the button "Check and Correct Assignments for Context Objects" PI removes the context object altogether.
    Operation 'SynchIncident':
    Assignment of Context Object OMS_JobNumber |
    http://oge.com/ccs/order is redundant and will be removed
    Any suggestions for resolving this issue?

    hi
    Most likely, applying the latest XI patches for your current SP release will resolve this issue. The components that you need to apply the patches are:       
    SAP-XIAFC                                                              
    SAP_XIAF                                                               
    SAP_XIESR                                                              
    SAP_XITOOL    
    Regards
    Mark
    Edited by: Mark Smyth on Aug 25, 2009 8:53 PM

  • Account Assignment to CO object

    Dear,
            While doing goods receipt  for Purchage oredr, it is showing error Account 800066 requires an assignment to CO object.
            Kindly help me out.
            I sincerely thanks in advance to responder.
    Regards
    AJIT K SINGH
    Edited by: AJIT K SINGH on Oct 30, 2009 9:37 AM

    Dear AJIT K SINGH,
    These are the following points could be the reasons for the Error;
    1. While cration of the Purchase Requisition u entered the Account Assignment Category, then only it will ask Cost Object while in GRN.
    2. In OKB9 my be automic assignment assiment must be there.
    In the previous mail as per as Mr. Prawan kumar, i hope in grn both accounts should be the Balance Sheet G/L account, then there is no chance, it would become as a Cost element.  Pawan kumar plese check once.
    Regards

  • Revenue account assignment for co object

    Dear All,
    Hi, I am posting customer invoice(FB70). At the time of posting i am getting the below error:
    Account assignment for co object.
    I already assigned the profit center in okb9. cost center is not assigned in okb9. because there is no direct co assignment for revenue cost element. is it right? if any wrong please correct me.
    Where i can assign the profitability segment in revenue gl account.please tel me assignment steps and t.code of that assignment.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Reddy

    where we can update the profitabilitry segment, any t.code is there.i tried to posting i am getting the error:
    Account 31111100 requires an assignment to a CO object
    Message no. KI235
    Diagnosis
    You have not defined a CO account assignment for an account that is relevant to cost accounting.
    System Response
    Account 31111100 is defined as a cost element.
    This means that you must always specify a CO account assignment.
    Procedure
    Enter one of the following CO account assignments
    Order
    Cost center / cost center/ activity type
    Sales order item (for a project or cost relevant)
    Project / WBS element
    Cost object (Process manufacturing)
    Network/ Network activities
    Business process
    Profitability segment
    Real estate object
    The posting row affected is 001, account 31111100.
    How to avoid the error message,how to assign the real controlling object to revenue account .please tel me process steps.
    Thanks & Regards, Reddy

  • WCM: Operational Class assignment to Technical Objects

    Greetings Experts, Gurus and SAP Sages!
    In WCM, we are able to create an Operational Class to restrict the particular Operational Conditions & Operational Groups that are relevant for the Technical Objects.
    But I am having difficulty uderstanding the practicality of this assignment:
    Is the assignment only made directly, by assiging an existing Technical Object (FL or EQ) to the Operational Class via transaction WCC8 ? If so, then how can we handle new master data? If a new FL or EQ is created, do we always need to run WCC8 again?
    As far as I know, an Operational Class is different from a Class in the sense of the Classification functionality, so we can't assign the Operational Conditions & Operational Groups to any existing Class of type 002 or 003, nor can we assign the Operational Class when creating a Technical Object in IL01 or IE01.
    So what is the purpose? Is there any automatic or indirect assignment possible? Or perhaps an enhancement is needed, to automatically assign a new FL or EQ to the OC based on some attributes?

    Thanks, Srinivas!
    The root of this requirement is actually the rather sketchy quality of the TO master data. Therefore, it's not possible to assign all the necessary Technical Objects to the Operational Class now, as more Technical Objects will be created as the solution matures. And going into WCC8 each time when the FL or EQ is created will be very cumbersome and prone to error.
    I'm actually thinking of utilizing User Exits to assign the Technical Object to Operational Class via a custom logic (based on Class or Object Type, as you rightly suggest).
    IEQM0003 Additional checks before equipment update
    ILOM0001 Additional checks before saving a functional location
    It's a bit disappointing there is not a standard way to do this...

  • Exchange Connector 3.0 (Hotfix Release) Error - Error Message=The key value of an object cannot be changed.

    Hello,
    I am running Service Manager 2012 with the Exchange Connector 3.0 RTM (Re-release Version).  The issue I have is that when an e-mail is processed that is trying to update the status or event log of an incident, the Exchange Connector encounters an error
    and will not update the object.  The Operations Manager log denotes: 
    Exchange Connector: Unable to process mail item. Subject="Close Ticket: [IRXXXXX]", Error Message=The key value of an object cannot be changed.
    This will happen on a seemingly random selection of Incident work items.  I cannot correlate them with a specific template, exchange connector, or incident tier queue that could be causing the issue.  I can recreate the way a specific ticket
    was created and update it through e-mail without issue, and the next ticket can cause the error to trigger. 
    I have already opened a Microsoft Support Case using our Software Assurance agreement.  After a few months of troubleshooting the issue and trying different fixes, Microsoft support said they were unable to fix the problem and that we would need to
    purchase Premier support to go further. At this point I thought I would reach out to the community for ideas.
    The setup I have for the Exchange connectors is as follows.
    I have three separate Exchange connectors set up to three different mailboxes.  One Exchange connector processes external support tickets and applies a specific template.  Another processes client support tickets and applies a different template. 
    And the last Exchange connector processes internal tickets and also processes the updates of tickets created by the other two exchange connectors. 
    Here are the fixes I've attempted so far:
    1.  Changed the templates that each Exchange connector applies.
    2.  Changed the management pack that each template is stored in.
    3.  Checked my management pack(s) for extended classes by searching for Extension="true" (This was also checked by Microsoft support)
    4.  Deleted each Exchange connector and recreated each connector
    5.  Deleted each Exchange connector, deleted the management pack, and reinstalled the management pack and connectors
    6.  Repeated Step 5, deleted Microsoft.SystemCenter.ExchangeConnector.dll and Microsoft.SystemCenter.ExchangeConnector.resources.dll and then installed the Exchange connector Re-release version 3.0 Published 10/7/2013 (which is supposed to address this
    issue)
    7.  Deleted the HealthServiceState folder and restarted the Management Service
    I'm not really sure what to do at this point.  I've put many hours into customizing my installation to get it working for my organization so reformatting and starting from scratch would be a nightmare scenario.  This environment is in production.
    I do have a band-aid in place using Orchestrator.  Basically I have a monitor task searching for the error message and when it finds one it searches the mailbox for the offending e-mail and applies either the Resolve or Close status change that is requested
    from the user.  However, I do not have it working to update the ticket if a comment is applied to the incident.  If anyone is in this position and needs to know how to apply this Orchestrator task I am willing to provide my workflow.
    I am new to the community and am already impressed with the amount of help and effort there is in this forum.  I appreciate in advance any help that is provided and am open to any ideas at this point.  I can post more information as needed.
    Thank you,
    John

    Yes that is the whole template.  However, I did confirm that this is only happening to incidents where either of two situations triggers a runbook to fire and modify the incident.  When I remove the activity from the incident it does clear the
    issue.  For some background the first Runbook Activity set's the first response date when an incident is resolved if the first response value is null.  The second assigns the incident to a user upon creation if the title contains assignto:username;
    1.)
    <ObjectTemplate ID="Template.d33b5bbcaf3c49b18d8b72bc1e5e1ee4" TypeID="IncidentManagement!System.WorkItem.Incident.ProjectionType">
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Incident_Library!System.WorkItem.Incident']/Escalated$">False</Property>
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Incident_Library!System.WorkItem.Incident']/NeedsKnowledgeArticle$">False</Property>
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Incident_Library!System.WorkItem.Incident']/HasCreatedKnowledgeArticle$">False</Property>
    <Object Path="$Context/Path[Relationship='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!System.WorkItemContainsActivity' TypeConstraint='CustomMicrosoft_SystemCenter_Orchestrator!Microsoft.SystemCenter.Orchestrator.RunbookAutomationActivity']$">
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomMicrosoft_SystemCenter_Orchestrator!Microsoft.SystemCenter.Orchestrator.RunbookAutomationActivity.Base']/RunbookId$">4085f0da-ab83-48e5-bbe3-1f3b5fa2dc4a</Property>
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomMicrosoft_SystemCenter_Orchestrator!Microsoft.SystemCenter.Orchestrator.RunbookAutomationActivity.Base']/TemplateId$">Template.d33b5bbcaf3c49b18d8b72bc1e5e1ee4</Property>
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomMicrosoft_SystemCenter_Orchestrator!Microsoft.SystemCenter.Orchestrator.RunbookAutomationActivity.Base']/IsReadyForAutomation$">True</Property>
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomMicrosoft_SystemCenter_Orchestrator!Microsoft.SystemCenter.Orchestrator.RunbookAutomationActivity.Base']/PropertyMapping$">&lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?&gt;
    &lt;ParameterMapping xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"&gt;
    &lt;ParameterList&gt;
    &lt;RunbookParameterItem&gt;
    &lt;Name&gt;Get RA Guid&lt;/Name&gt;
    &lt;Id&gt;344b15effc1a44528e517c5b4227179c&lt;/Id&gt;
    &lt;Type&gt;String&lt;/Type&gt;
    &lt;Value&gt;Generic::Id&lt;/Value&gt;
    &lt;Direction&gt;In&lt;/Direction&gt;
    &lt;ContextInfo /&gt;
    &lt;/RunbookParameterItem&gt;
    &lt;/ParameterList&gt;
    &lt;RunbookId&gt;4085f0da-ab83-48e5-bbe3-1f3b5fa2dc4a&lt;/RunbookId&gt;
    &lt;/ParameterMapping&gt;</Property>
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!System.WorkItem.Activity']/ChildId$">1906</Property>
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!System.WorkItem.Activity']/Status$">$MPElement[Name='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!ActivityStatusEnum.Active']$</Property>
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!System.WorkItem.Activity']/Skip$">False</Property>
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Library!System.WorkItem']/Title$">Set First Response on Resolve</Property>
    </Object>
    </ObjectTemplate>
    2.)
    <ObjectTemplate ID="Template.b311e1f9126e4e19bbbbeb65ddb220ba" TypeID="IncidentManagement!System.WorkItem.Incident.ProjectionType">
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Incident_Library!System.WorkItem.Incident']/Escalated$">False</Property>
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Incident_Library!System.WorkItem.Incident']/Status$">$MPElement[Name='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Incident_Library!IncidentStatusEnum.Active']$</Property>
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Incident_Library!System.WorkItem.Incident']/NeedsKnowledgeArticle$">False</Property>
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Incident_Library!System.WorkItem.Incident']/HasCreatedKnowledgeArticle$">False</Property>
    <Object Path="$Context/Path[Relationship='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!System.WorkItemContainsActivity' TypeConstraint='CustomMicrosoft_SystemCenter_Orchestrator!Microsoft.SystemCenter.Orchestrator.RunbookAutomationActivity']$">
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomMicrosoft_SystemCenter_Orchestrator!Microsoft.SystemCenter.Orchestrator.RunbookAutomationActivity.Base']/RunbookId$">ca88b13b-861a-4d39-a3cb-fd912d951e35</Property>
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomMicrosoft_SystemCenter_Orchestrator!Microsoft.SystemCenter.Orchestrator.RunbookAutomationActivity.Base']/TemplateId$">Template.b311e1f9126e4e19bbbbeb65ddb220ba</Property>
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomMicrosoft_SystemCenter_Orchestrator!Microsoft.SystemCenter.Orchestrator.RunbookAutomationActivity.Base']/IsReadyForAutomation$">True</Property>
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomMicrosoft_SystemCenter_Orchestrator!Microsoft.SystemCenter.Orchestrator.RunbookAutomationActivity.Base']/PropertyMapping$">&lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?&gt;
    &lt;ParameterMapping xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"&gt;
    &lt;ParameterList&gt;
    &lt;RunbookParameterItem&gt;
    &lt;Name&gt;RA Activity GUID&lt;/Name&gt;
    &lt;Id&gt;5677d117a0294a2c898a695032f26c72&lt;/Id&gt;
    &lt;Type&gt;String&lt;/Type&gt;
    &lt;Value&gt;Generic::Id&lt;/Value&gt;
    &lt;Direction&gt;In&lt;/Direction&gt;
    &lt;ContextInfo /&gt;
    &lt;/RunbookParameterItem&gt;
    &lt;/ParameterList&gt;
    &lt;RunbookId&gt;ca88b13b-861a-4d39-a3cb-fd912d951e35&lt;/RunbookId&gt;
    &lt;/ParameterMapping&gt;</Property>
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!System.WorkItem.Activity']/ChildId$">1120</Property>
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!System.WorkItem.Activity']/Status$">$MPElement[Name='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!ActivityStatusEnum.Active']$</Property>
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!System.WorkItem.Activity']/Skip$">False</Property>
    <Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='WorkItem!System.WorkItem']/Title$">Execute Orchestrator IR - Autoassign</Property>
    </Object>
    </ObjectTemplate>

Maybe you are looking for

  • When do we override our own clone method not the Object class clone method

    Hi, I have a confusion in overriding clone method.We can create clone object by writing Object.clone() but some times I have seen writing our own clone method ,when do we write this,also clone() is defined protected and when we write our own clone it

  • Lightroom raw processing error - ORF file format

    I am trying to get Lightroom to import files from my Olympus E510. It creates files in raw (.orf) format. The Olympus tool supplied with the camera works fine and reads all of the files. Lightroom says ALL of the files are corrupt. I'd really like to

  • Regarding Intracompany STO

    Hi Gurus, Here my question is if we can transfer goods from one plant to another plant with in the same company (intracompany) by using movement types. Then why sometimes we are using STO process for intra company.And could you please explain me the

  • IBooks is not on my iTunes

    I have had the iBooks app on my iPod forever. Unfortunately the books have never synced onto my iTunes on my computer ever. In fact there isn't even the iBooks tab in my iTunes on my PC. What do I do to fix this?

  • IP and VIP adresses temporary on different subnets

    I was wondering if it's possible to add a third node temporary on a different subnet ? I mean.. now my two nodes have these IP: XXX.XXX.0.5 and XXX.XXX.0.6 , VIP are: XXX.XXX.7.15 and XXX.XXX.7.16 Is it possible to add a third node with IP YYY.YYY.0.