Error trasnporting DSOs into production

Hi experts
I'm transporting all my objects to production systems.. These are the initial transports, as we still haven't got anything in BW Prd.
The transports have been working ok.., except transports of DSO. All flows that don't have DSO are transported with no issue.. All flows with DSO's have issues.
Regarding the ones with issues, I've tried to transport many different ways, just the DSO, The dso with bellow flow, the DSO with bellow and after flow.. and all of them finish with error
DataSource 8* does not exist in source system BWPRD of versionA
Error when creating the export datasource and dependent objects
Error when activating the DSO.
I've searched for similar problems in the web, and it seems that the BW my system connection shouln't be working fine (or working at all). This is consistent with the fact that transports that don't envolve BW connection to itself, are going throgh.
My issue is I'm working on this alone, and i don't have any BASIS available..
Can anyone provide some clarity on this type of connection? What should i be looking for?
I've gone to TCODE SM59, but i don't know what i should be looking for.
Can anyone help?
Many thanks
Joana

Hi Joana
RSA1->Source System>MySap connection->Right Click-->Restore
Keep BW system open and modifiable while doing this.
SE06---->System Change Option -
> Edit -
>Software Comp modifiable
> Namespace modifiable
SCC4 --->Click on BW Client --->Changes to Repos and cross-client customizing allowed under cross client object changes
> Protection level zero
Also keep ready your background user id password ready in case they are maintained incorrectly in SM59
Edited by: Anindya Bose on Feb 16, 2012 8:38 PM

Similar Messages

Getting Error when convert the plan order into production order

Hi Experts,
When i converting the planorder into production order i am getting this error
could you please suggest me hoew can i resolve this issue.
Message no. CK466
Diagnosis
The system could not calculate a price for the internal activity with activity type 20000 of cost
center 110TUP002 because none of the valuation strategies in valuation variant 006 was successful.
System Response
If the system issues a warning message or an information message, the costing item will be
used in costing with a value of zero.
If the system issues an error message, it sets the status "KF" (costed with errors).
If the system issues a termination message, the cost estimate cannot be processed.
Procedure
1. Check the master data for activity type 20000 of cost center 110TUP002.
2. If you have authorization for Customizing, check the valuation strategy for internal activities
in valuation variant 006.
Thanks&regards.
Sateesh.C

Hi,
For the orders for which you get the error, note the dates, then check in KSBT, whether there is price maintained for that period.
Eg: If the order has a start - 2nd Aug, 2010 & end 10th Aug, 2010, then check if price exists for period - 08, year - 2010
Regards,
Vivek
Added
If the values are maintained, then check the costing variants specified for the order type in OPL8 for plant - order type combination in cost accounting tab. Then in OPL1, check the details specified for the variants. If you're not sure on this, take help from your FI-Co colleague.

Number range error for some materials when converting into Production order

Hi,
Please I need some help with my error.
When trying to convert planned orders into production orders, I receive an error message saying Internal assignment not defined for number range XX.
The strange part is that is only happening for two materials! Material type is the same one we always use.
The planned orders have also the same type.
Any idea?
Thanks,

Hi,
I think for these 2 materials system is selecting the order type for which external number range is marked and ingternal number range is switched off.
Can you go to CO01 and create a production order for these materials directly w/o assigning order type on intial screen. check which order type is detrmined by system and check its number range in co86.
please check.

Error creating job into trigger using DBMS_SCHEDULER.

Hi,
I am trying to create job using dbms_scheduler package. I have one trigger on insert event on one table. I am creating job using following syntax.
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER TRG_BI_JOB_CONFIG BEFORE INSERT ON JOB_CONFIG FOR EACH ROW
DECLARE
BEGIN
     DBMS_SCHEDULER.Create_Job(job_name => 'my_job1'
                         ,job_type => 'PLSQL_BLOCK'
                         ,job_action => 'delete_temp'
                         ,start_date => TO_DATE('15-JUL-2003 1:00:00 AM', 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
                              ,repeat_interval => 'FREQ=DAILY'
                         ,enabled => TRUE
                         ,comments => 'DELETE FOR job schedule.');
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN RAISE;
END;
but I am getting following error while inserting into JOB_CONFIG table.
ORA-04092: cannot in a trigger
ORA-06512: at "PRAKASH1.TRG_BI_JOB_CONFIG", line 41
ORA-04088: error during execution of trigger
same above statement If I am running from sqlplus then It is creating job without error. If I am creating job using DBMS_JOB into trigger then It is also working fine but this package is depricated from oracle10g so I cannt use it any more.
My Oracle version is 'Oracle DATABASE 10g RELEASE 10.2.0.1.0 - Production'.
can anyone help me in this context.

I have a few comments on this thread as an Oracle dbms_scheduler developer.
- Oracle takes backward compatibility very seriously. Although dbms_job is deprecated, the interface will continue to work indefinitely. The deprecation of dbms_job is so that customers will be encouraged to take advantage of the more powerful dbms_scheduler. It is extremely unlikely that entire blocks of functionality will ever be removed. There is currently no plan to remove dbms_job functionality (and even if there were, doing so would be strenuously opposed by many users).
- lots of internal Oracle database components are standardizing on using dbms_scheduler (resource manager, materialized views, auto sql tuning etc). This is good evidence that it will continue to be the recommended scheduling method for the foreseeable future - not even the concept of a replacement exists. It is also under active development.
- The reason for the automatic commit is that a dbms_scheduler job is a full database object like a stored procedure or a table. So a call to dbms_scheduler.create_job is like executing a DDL which takes effect immediately. A dbms_job job is mostly just a row in a table so a call to dbms_job.submit behaves like regular DML. There are many advantages to a job being a full database object but DDL behaviour is an unfortunate requirement of this.
Hope this clears a few things up, reply with any questions.
-Ravi

Office 2013 Technet installation Error 25004. The product key you entered cannot be used on this machine. (System error: - 1073422314)

I am receiving an error when attempting to install
Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2013 which I downloaded from the TechNet site. At the end of the installation process I receive the following message:
"Error 25004. The product key you entered cannot be used on this machine. This is most likely due to previous Office 2013 trials being installed. (System error:
-1073422314)"
I have never installed a trial or Beta of any Office product on this machine.   However, I have installed Office 2007 Ultimate and Office 2010 Professional Plus. All of these are 32bit versions downloaded from TechNet site. In addition,
prior to this error I had attempted unsuccessfully to install the 64bit version of Office 2013 as well as standalone versions of Visio Professional 2013 x64 and Project professional 2013 x64.   All three of these installations failed due to previous
installation of 32bit Office software, so I have downloaded the 32 bit versions but not yet tried to install, other than Office 2013.
I used the Custom upgrade option during the attempted install of Office 2013, specifying "keep all prior versions".
Note that all the above was done on a new machine. The specific purpose was to test co-existence of multiple versions of OFFICE (2007, 2010, 2013) to facilitate user training and migration.
I have tried uninstalling via Control Panel, and performed some of the steps for manual removal, however did not do all of them since 1) They are quite lengthy and 2) Some of them seem to involve removing ALL prior versions of Office, which I do not want
to do; the earlier versions are working properly and I do not want to have to uninstall them. Just want to uninstall and reinstall Office 2013.   Also tried running O15CTRREMOVE.diagcab which indicated that it could not find a problem,
but did not seem to remove anything.
I have read about ten recommended TechNet articles, which recommend everything from running a FIXIt tool, uninstalling all OFFICE software, and reformatting the whole machine. Most of these involve System error -1073418209 rather than -1073422314 (which
is the code that I am getting).   Other than that the problem sounds the same. This seems to be a problem with key management and copy protection in these products, dating back to 2010. Dozens of IT professionals have tried the solutions
and vented their frustration since other than the full format, the other solutions work only sporadically, if at all. Some of these people had been working with trial or beta software, but many who encountered this problem had not.  As
noted above, none of my software was a trail version.   I do not want to uninstall all the OFFICE versions, particularly if it as likely as not will not resolve the issue.   (I am also getting paranoid to the extent of fearing that
after uninstalling everything I might not be able to reinstall any version). I think what we need here is a definitive fix from Microsoft, though I am not too hopeful, in view of the lack of response to all the other technicians who have been struggling
with this for at least the past three years.
If anyone is aware of a solution which works consistently, I would appreciate it. Reformatting however is not an option. Detailed instructions for completely uninstalling Office 2013 (ONLY 2013) might be helpful. I would be willing to uninstall
all versions, but only as a last resort, and only if there is some assurance that this will actual solve the problem (for many others it did not seem to do so).
Thanks
PS: Probably doesn't matter, but I am running this on Windows 7 Pro w/SP1, 64 bit edition.

Tony,
Thanks for your reply.   I do in fact have three versions of Office installed on this machine, 2007 2010 and (hopefully) 2013. I have on previous occasions installed 2007 and 2010 on a single machine, but this is my first attempt to install
2013.
According to TechNet article  office.microsoft.com/en-us/support/install-and-use-multiple-versions-of-office-on-the-same-pc-HA103981695.aspx (Install
and use multiple versions of Office on the same PC) it is possible to install
Office 2003 2007 2010 and 2013 on a single system, provided they are installed in the sequence indicated.  It is noted that some problems may occur, notably involving file associations, but there is no
mention of any activation key issues.
As stated in my original request, the software which I have installed is NOT a trail version.   I did NOT obtain it from the evalcenter, but from
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-US/subscriptions/securedownloads/hh442904.
The above is a full retail version.    The files which I downloaded are:
en_office_ultimate_2007_united_states_x86_dvd_480625.iso
en_office_professional_plus_2010_x86_515486.exe
en_office_professional_plus_2013_x86_dvd_1123673.iso
I know that the error message says that the problem is commonly caused by attempting to install trial software more than once, but that is not the case. Several other people have reported this same problem, sometimes involving trial software but not
in every case.    My own opinion is that this is a software bug involving key management and copy protection.
Many people have reported on TechNet that the problem was NOT resolved even after uninstalling all Office software. While there is a chance I might get lucky, I really would like a solution which has a better chance for success.
By any chance, does the error code 1073422314
provide any further insight into this issue?
Thanks again for your help. However, further assistance is needed to resolve this issue.
PS: Sorry the font sizes are so mixed up, I haven't quite figured out how to control the formatting when I paste

Error while loggin into EPMA after schema migration - 9.3.1.3 to11.1.1.3.02

Hello Everyone,
We are migrating 9.3.1.3 EPMA DB schema (having planning/hfm applications) to 11.1.1.3 EPMA. Applied the required patch - "p9535372" to target server "11.1.1.3" so now target server is 11.1.1.3.02. After patch apply, we migrate the EPMA DB Schema and execute the upgrade through Configurater. Everything goes fine and able to login into shared services and workspace but system throws an error while loging into EPMA.
Error Message -
1) loading the module 'awb.appcontainer" failed
2) Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
Raised the SR - 3-4112905501 and BUG16- Bug 12808646 with oracle support/product team, meanwhile any suggestion/advice will be of Gr8 help
We have followed the other meta-link docs in reference to this issue, but not able to resolve the issue
1071537.1
763095.1
754408.1
Thanks in Advance
Amit

Hi John,
Thanks for you reply. Do you mean the process should be as follows (i add step 4 and remove step 7)? What about migrating business rules and calcmanager, how can i migrate this?
Kind Regards
1. Backup the relational tables of the application in 9.3.1
2. Backup essbase objects (rul, otl ,csc, rep)
3. Install EPMA 11.1.2.2 in a new server, including a new sql server instance.
4. Shared Services provisioning use CSSImportExport utility to export from the 9.3.1 env and then transform to LCM format to import, or you can look at the HSSMigrate utility which is available with 11.1.2.2 (JohnGoodwin)
5. Create a new application same name of database and connection and apply a “create” --->“Create a fresh planning application on version 11 make sure the admin is the same name as your old 9.3 planning app: “If the admin of your 9.3 planning application a native user and not the default hyperion system admin (account=admin) then; Go into the database tables for the planning app and look at table HSP_USERS, store the SID value against user 50001" JohnGoodwin:
https://forums.oracle.com/forums/message.jspa?messageID=3897312
6. Stop application, shutdown services.
7. Restore all relational tables of the 9.3.1 application (step 1) in to the ne application (step 5.)
8. Start services, apply a create in the application.
9. Copy objects (step 2) except otl.
10. Export data from 9.3.1 and import data to 11.1.2.2 application.
Edited by: Pavel Moreno on Mar 4, 2013 7:08 AM
Edited by: Pavel Moreno on Mar 4, 2013 7:09 AM

REP-1425 report formula DO_SQL error putting value into column

Hi all
I have opened a report 2.5 in Oracle9i Reports Developer and, it converted ok. However, when I run the report (paper layout), the message
rep-1425 report formula DO_SQL error putting value
into column. Column may not be referenced by parameter
triggers
appears. There are several report level formula columns and corresponding placeholder columns that are the cause of this error. The formula has the following :
SRW.DO_SQL('SELECT RPAD(''DAILY TABLE AUDIT REPORT'',60,''.'')||TO_CHAR(SYSDATE,''DD-MON-YYYY'') INTO :REPORT_TIT FROM DUAL');
COMMIT;
RETURN('');
I can't work out what this error message really means as the column, report_tit is a placeholder column and, the formula column is not a parameter trigger!! The report_tit placeholder is used as a source for a layout field. I noticed that the layout field is defined as a placeholder column in the converted report but in the reports 2.5 version, it is defined as a layout field.
I can do a work around by replacing the SRW.DO_SQL statement with a normal PL/SQL SELECT statement. However, I wonder if anyone else has had the same problem and, if anyone can help provide an answer as to what this error really means and, also, how I can retain the SRW.DO_SQL statement and/or an alternative work around to the one that I have described.
Thanks.
Therese Hughes
Forest Products Commision

Hi again
The firewall proved to be the problem after all! The firewall set in Reports config-files is not used for WebServices, it has to be set within the stub:
Properties prop = System.getProperties();
prop.put("http.proxyHost","yourProxyServer");
prop.put("http.proxyPort","youProxyServerPort");
I inserted this in my java-code and after some problems (see below), restarting Report Builder turned the trick, the report works now.
Cheers
Tino
Here there mail I set up before I found that restarting Report Builder helped:
Thanks for your answer, putting in the proxy-settings actually helped some - the same error message is
popping up, but instantly and not after 10 seconds like before:
My proxy lines look like this, I also tried "http://proxy.ch.oracle.com", but "proxy.ch.oracle.com" proved to
be the correct syntax:
public Float getRate(String country1, String country2) throws Exception
Float returnVal = null;
Properties prop = System.getProperties();
prop.put("http.proxyHost","proxy.ch.oracle.com");
prop.put("http.proxyPort","8080");
URL endpointURL = new URL(endpoint);
Call call = new Call();
I tested the new proxy-entries by disabling the proxy preference in JDeveloper, so I could verify the added
proxy-lines in the code work - they do. If I change the proxy to some incorrect value like
"proxyy.ch.oracle.com", they fail.
After unsuccessfully trying recompile and re-import of Java classes, I rebuild the report from scratch and
stumbled over the same problem. Now the question is, whether I'm still doing something wrong with the
proxy or whether there is another problem after passing the firewall....
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Error while logging into applications in R12(21.1.3)

Hi,
We are getting below error while logging into applications in R12 (12.1.3).
**"You have encountered an unexpected error. Please contact the system administrator for assistance"**
Everytime we face this issue, we will bounce OACORE services then the issue will not occur again.
Can you please help me in finding permanent fix for this issue?
FYI,
I have performed the following debugging steps to check the issue further
1.     Enabled FND diagnostics at the site level .
2.     Added following lines in ocj4.properties file
AFLOG_ENABLED=true
AFLOG_LEVEL=statement
AFLOG_MODULE=% (% captures all - preferable to use products such as fnd, ies, por)
AFLOG_FILENAME=/tmp/test.log
3.     Examined the output from aoltest.jsp. Please find the attached AOL-J diagnostics test file.
Then I have reproduced the issue, and examined all the log files but couldn’t find any error information.
Thanks,
Srinivasulu.

Everytime we face this issue, we will bounce OACORE services then the issue will not occur again.
Can you please help me in finding permanent fix for this issue?
Then I have reproduced the issue, and examined all the log files but couldn’t find any error information. If bouncing the services fixes the issue, then there must be some details about the error in the logs.
R12, 12.1 - How To Enable and Collect Debug for HTTP, OC4J and OPMN [ID 422419.1]
How to enable Apache, OC4J and OPMN logging in Oracle Applications R12 [ID 419839.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Application ID reserved error upon import into workspace

I have two workspaces, development and production, in one APEX (3.0.1) environment on 11.1.0.6.
I have two applications, one 1 page long and one 33 pages long. The 1 page application is an anonymous login with a jump button to the login page of the 33 page application.
I normally export from development and import into production to make an upgrade of the applications. I can do this successfully with the longer application, upon import I ask to replace the target workspace application ID. When I try this with the 1 page application, I get an error about the application ID being reserved.
The application IDs are normal numbers.
33 pages - development workspace/appl id 107 ==> production workspace/appl id 111 - Works
1 page - development workspace/appl id 119 ==> production workspace/appl id 121 - Fails
Luckily the problem is on the 1 page application. I just redo the edits from development in production.
Any suggestions how to resolve the error so I don't have to re-edit? I'm fearful that it may start happening on the bigger application. That will not be an easy one to re-edit each time I have a release.
Thanks,
Ed

I solved this but I don't know how I caused it.
In the export repository in the target workspace, the Application Exists column had a check. I deleted the row from the repository, and I was able to import into the workspace and change the application number to the one which matched the Application Exists number.
How I got that check mark to show up is a different story. I can't remember doing anything to cause that. Maybe it was the initial import of the application to that then unused number? At least I know how to fix it now.

Importing BW DSO Into HANA - Authorization Issue

Hi All,
I was trying to importing BW DSO into HANA . The Analytic view is showing error during activation time, showing insufficient privilege.
While opening the view, one default schema ABC(<missing>) is showing,whereas ABC schema is not available under schema list.
How to activate the analytic view ?
I didn't find the BW schema in HANA studio, I did-> Select * from M_CS_TABLE where table_name like '/bic/A%00' etc - showing BLANK row.
I am having authorization SYS_BIC schema but problem only BW related object under this schema while selecting some BW object from this schema.
Pls suggest.
Thanks & Regards
Kamruz

Thanks for your reply.
For this time being, I created a Calculation view based on that Analytic View after switch off some fields in view.
The thing is, If I switch off few fields, Calculation view is working fine.
How can I enable rest of the fields.
Amalytic view Error Message :
Table /BI0/T** could not be found or user has insufficient privileges
Table /BIC/AZZB_O0100 could not be found or user has insufficient privileges

Transporting changes into production

guys,
1) my fellow basis colleague is asserting that all the transports that are imported into QA system should be imported into Production . What if the change does not pass testing in QA ?? how can i import it into production ? please tell me who is right.
2) I see a lot of transports in my QA system's import queue that havent been imported into the system. This means that my development system and QA/production systems are totally out of sync. Should all the transports that have been released from DEV be imported into QA Or should the developers not release transports that are not needed in QA ? please advise.
thanks
Rajiv

>
rajivshekhar wrote:
> guys,
>
> 1) my fellow basis colleague is asserting that all the transports that are imported into QA system should be imported into Production . What if the change does not pass testing in QA ?? how can i import it into production ? please tell me who is right.
All the transports that have been moved to quality must be checked properly and and then moved to prouction only when there are error free.
>
2) I see a lot of transports in my QA system's import queue that havent been imported into the system. This means that my development system and QA/production systems are totally out of sync. Should all the transports that have been released from DEV be imported into QA Or should the developers not release transports that are not needed in QA ? please advise.
>
> thanks
>
> Rajiv
Ideally you should not imort any transport request into quality unless told by development team. If they have been released in development then its not necessary to import in quality.
Your SAP development system wil never be in sync with your Quality as you will be using it a sadbox system.
Regards,
Nirmal.K

Transport Request is not flagged for import into production.

When I try to migrate a CR from the quality system to the acceptance system, through solution manager system, the status flag still remains to be "To be tested" which normally does not happen.
I get 4 warnings as below:
1) Status was reset by system
2) No import into test system has taken place.
3) Transport request is not flagged for import into production
4) The tester role cannot be the same as the developer role.
Usually when a CR is selected for migration to Acceptance, the status flag automatically sets to "productive", which in turn depicts that the CR has been migrated to acceptance and is ready for import into production.
But when I check the Transport log in the acceptance system, it is evident that the CR has been migrated to acceptance with errors.

I guess these errors you mentioned are the reason why ChaRM reports your transprot request as
2) No import into test system has taken place.
1) Status was reset because 2) is not fullfilled.
3) did not get flagged because status was not set due to previous errors.
4) business partner of user with function "tester" (apparently the one who tries to set status) is the same as the business partner assigned to function "developer". If it should be the same person you can switch off the warning in customizing.
Try to correct import errors and repeat status switch.

How to trace planned order data after it has been converted into production

Hi, There,
The planned order has been converted into production order.
However, I need to trace if this planned order is generated by MRP
run or created manually. I can't get any planned order info from
table PLAF. Any input?
Regards,
Nancy

Hi,
Once fully converted, the Planned Order data will not be available in the Table : PLAF.
If it is available, then You can have the details with the Time Stamp and User data from PLAF.
But, the refrence will be available in the Production Order.
You want to make a Track of the Planned Order details and the Quanity, then you need to have/create Z tables so that the data will be availabe.
This is how most of the Organizations keep a track of the Planned order data.
Hope this helps..
Regards,
Siva

Error While creating a Product Group

Dear All;
When running MRP, we would like to run it for specific materials only.
To do so, we need to group the materials in product groups.
While creating a product Group using T.code MC84, i get an error message
"The field is defined as a required field; it does not contain an entry
Message no. MG144"
Kindly advise me on how to resolve this.
Regards;
Richard.

Hi,
Refer below OSS note:
Note 621753 - MC84: Error message when creating product group & it's related ones.
Regards,
Ram

Error while creating the product group by MC84

Hello Friends,
I am creating the product group by MC84, and in product group field i have given the product group name i.e P2345, and its description i.e product group for waluj, plant i.e cw01 and Base unit i.e KG.Now when i press enter system is throwing the error"The field is defined as the required field;it doesnot contain an entry."Message no.MG144.And with this error system is placing the cursor on product group field.As i have already given product group name than also system is throwing the error.
Though i know the alternative method to create product group by MMO1 and selecting the material type PROD, then also i want to know why system is throwing the error while creating the product group by MC84.
Please guide.

Dear,
This message says that you have not entered a mandatory field.Enter proper values for all mandatory fields and then you will not get this error.
Try to create the product group as material of material type"PROD"
Then you go on adding the memebers in SOP Transaction.
In some of the versions of SAP it is the problem.
I have also faced this problem in some versions.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Error trasnporting DSOs into production

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for